Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 17;60(2):1117–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.071

Table 4.

Network assessment results for the subjects’ networks, edge-based mean and median correlation networks, and mean ERGM and median ERGM simulation-based networks.

Nc L K C Eloc Eglob R
Subject
Mean 83.7 4.14 5.05 0.40 0.49 0.28 0.29
Median 84.5 4.18 5.04 0.41 0.49 0.28 0.30
Edge-Based Network Distance with K Distance without K
Mean 89 3.54 6.42 0.44 0.55 0.35 0.33 5.51 5.33
Median 88 3.01 7.60 0.45 0.59 0.39 0.22 4.49 3.69
EGRM Simulation
Unconstrained
Mean 1 85 4.48 4.09 0.37 0.45 0.26 0.11 1.66 1.36
2 85 3.63 4.58 0.35 0.44 0.30 0.09 1.49 1.41
3 83 4.12 3.76 0.39 0.45 0.26 0.12 1.48 0.72
4 88 4.28 4.27 0.45 0.52 0.29 0.02 4.38 4.31
5 83 4.59 3.84 0.40 0.47 0.24 0.20 1.47 0.84

Median 1 86 3.93 4.62 0.34 0.41 0.30 0.40 1.58 1.53
2 87 4.48 4.31 0.42 0.51 0.27 0.20 2.63 2.52
3 86 4.35 4.64 0.42 0.49 0.28 0.39 1.57 1.51
4 86 3.83 4.71 0.36 0.46 0.30 0.33 1.58 1.54
5 78 4.72 3.78 0.43 0.49 0.22 0.20 6.65 6.52
Constrained
Mean 1 83 4.43 5.04 0.45 0.56 0.26 0.47 0.79 0.79
2 83 5.51 5.04 0.43 0.51 0.23 0.61 1.57 1.57
3 81 6.35 5.04 0.46 0.56 0.21 0.42 3.50 3.50
4 83 4.26 5.04 0.40 0.49 0.27 0.55 0.76 0.76
5 84 4.30 5.04 0.34 0.45 0.27 0.57 0.45 0.45

Median 1 86 5.21 5.04 0.39 0.48 0.25 0.59 1.85 1.85
2 86 4.32 5.04 0.34 0.43 0.28 0.62 1.54 1.54
3 83 5.17 5.04 0.44 0.52 0.24 0.46 1.81 1.81
4 84 4.16 5.04 0.37 0.47 0.28 0.49 0.54 0.54
5 83 4.63 5.04 0.40 0.51 0.26 0.47 1.57 1.57

Note: “Distance” denotes the Euclidean distance between metric values of the potential representative networks and the corresponding mean or median metric values of the subjects’ networks.

“Distance w/o K” denotes the same distance with mean degree (K) left out of the calculation.