Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
letter
. 2012 Jan 12;106(5):962–965. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.598

Population-based cancer incidence in Sikkim, India: report on ethnic variation

Y Verma 1,*, P K Pradhan 1, N Gurung 1, S D Sapkota 1, P Giri 1, P Sundas 1, B N Bhattarai 1, D Nadayil 2, T Ramnath 2, A Nandakumar 2
PMCID: PMC3305974  PMID: 22240780

Abstract

Background:

A Population-Based Cancer Registry (PBCR) was set up in Sikkim (a state in the North Eastern India) in 2003. We examined incidence rates by ethnic groups from 2003–2008.

Methods:

Age-adjusted incidence rates (AARs) per 100 000 person-years were calculated by direct method using the world standard population, and analysed by ethnic group (Bhutia, Rai and other).

Result:

There were a total of 1148 male and 1063 female cases of cancer between 2003 and 2008 on the Sikkim PBCR. The overall AARs were 89.4 and 99.4 per 100 000 person-years in males and females, respectively. Incidence rates were highest amongst the Bhutia group (AAR=172.4 and 147.4 per 100 000 person-years in males and females, respectively), and the largest difference in rates were observed for stomach cancers with AARs being 12.6 and 4.7 times higher in the Bhutia group compared with other ethnic groups in males and females, respectively.

Conclusion:

These observations call for further epidemiological investigations and the introduction of screening programmes.

Keywords: incidence, Sikkim, India


The Population-Based Cancer Registry (PBCR) in Sikkim was started in 2003 under the National Cancer Registry Programme (NCRP) of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). The initiative by the ICMR to commence six PBCRs in the North Eastern states of India was due to the possible higher incidence of cancer reported under the project on development of an atlas of cancer in India (Nandakumar et al, 2005). Cancer registration as in the other PBCRs in India is active.

Cancer of the stomach among migrant ethnic groups has been studied in Illinois, USA (Cho et al, 1996). Similarly, American ethnic groups like the American Indians and Alaska Natives have shown greater risk for stomach cancers than the non-Hispanic Whites (Wiggins et al, 2008).

There is paucity of data on the prevalence of oesophageal cancer risk factors by race, ethnicity and gender. However, a study showed that age-adjusted oesophageal cancer incidence rates in blacks was more than twice the rate in whites (8.63 vs 4.39, P<0.05) (Baquet et al, 2005).

In a study conducted among specific American Pacific Islander population in the US, it was found that incidence of liver cancer among Samoan men was the highest (Miller et al, 2008).

The incidence rates of nasopharyngeal cancer are as high as 300–800 cases per 1 million in some Cantonese regions of Southern China (Muir et al, 1987).

In India, however, no study has been done on ethnic populations with reference to incidence of stomach, oesophageal, nasopharyngeal, and liver cancer.

In Sikkim, there are 13 ethnic groups having diverse lifestyle and dietary habits. The Bhutias were early immigrants from the Tibetan province of Khams (Risley, 1928). The dominant heterogeneous Nepalese population of various ethnicities, including the Rais, are later immigrants from Nepal (Lama, 1994; Menon and Banerjea, 2005). We report the incidence and patterns of cancer including the ethnic variation observed during the first 6 years (2003–2008) of registry operation.

Materials and methods

The PBCR covers the entire state of Sikkim, with a population of 540 851 (2001 census of India). A standard incidence and mortality form by the NCRP is used to collect the respective information. This form has set guidelines and is followed by all 24 PBCRs within the NCRP network. The third edition of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O-3) was used to classify tumours, and only malignant neoplasms (those with behaviour code 3) are included in the registry (April et al, 2000).

The registry population area at risk was estimated using the 1991 and 2001 census population (Census of India 1991, 2001) by sex, as well as the growth rate during that interval using the difference distribution method (Takiar and Shobana, 2009). The population estimation according to ethnic group was estimated using the 2001 census population and ethnic breakup of the population provided by Directorate of Economics, Statistics, Monitoring and Evaluation (DESME) (State Socioeconomic census, 2006). The 13 ethnic groups as defined by DESME were aggregated into the following 3 main groups due to small numbers of cases: Bhutia, Rai and others (including all 11 other ethnic groups). The age-adjusted incidence rates (AAR) per 100 000 person-years, were calculated by direct method using the world standard population (Jensen et al, 1991).

Results

There were 2211 registered cancer cases during the 6-year period, 2003–2008. The average annual AAR per 100 000 population for all sites was 89.4 in males and 99.4 in females. The most common site of cancer in males was stomach cancer that comprised 15% of all sites of cancer, followed by cancer of the oesophagus (10%). In females, the most common site of cancer was cancer of the cervix uteri accounting for 11.7% of all cancers in females, followed by cancer of the breast (9.1%). Among females, cancers of the stomach and oesophagus were also among the leading sites of cancer 8.1% (AAR-8.75) and 7.6% (AAR-7.5), respectively.

The average AAR of all sites of cancer combined in both males and females are slightly lower than the urban registries and higher than that of the only rural registry data of Barshi. However, when the AARs of specific sites of cancer are examined, higher incidence rates are seen in cancers of the stomach, oesophagus, and nasopharyngeal cancer in both sexes (National Cancer Registry Programme. Indian Council of Medical Research, 2010).

Table 1 gives the distribution of the number of cases by sex and ethnic group, alongside the population at risk in each category. The Bhutia group comprised approximately 13% of the population but accounted for almost double the proportion of cancers.

Table 1. Population at risk and cancer cases based on ethnic groups of Sikkim (2003–2008).

Sikkim Population at risk
Cases
ethnicity Male % Female % Male % Female %
Bhutia 255 538 12.8 231 495 13.3 305 26.6 238 22.4
Rai 264 469 13.3 240 811 13.8 139 12.1 162 15.2
Others 147 239 4 73.9 126 716 9 72.8 704 61.3 663 62.4
All Sikkim 199 240 1 100 173 947 5 100 1148 100 1063 100

Table 2 gives the AAR for all sites and leading sites of cancer in both males and females by ethnic groups. The AAR in Bhutia males was 172.4 per 100 000 compared with 72.9 in the Rai group and 76.8 in the ‘others’ category. Likewise, among females the AAR for all sites of cancer was 147.4 compared with 111.9 and 87.8 for Rai and the ‘others’ group, respectively. Among the leading sites of cancer, cancer of the stomach showed the most significant difference between the Bhutia and the other two groups in both males and females. The AARs among the Bhutias was 12.6 and 4.7 times higher than the Rai group in males and females, respectively.

Table 2. Leading sites of cancer by ethnic groups of Sikkim giving number (No) of cases and the age-adjusted incidence rates (AAR) per 100 000 population (2003–2008).

Bhutia Rai
Others
Site No AAR Site No AAR Site No AAR
Males
 Stomach 104 60.6 Lung and others 14 8.2 Oesophagus 66 7.6
 Oesophagus 38 22.6 Oesophagus 11 6 Stomach 59 6.8
 Liver 34 19.6 Nasopharynx 10 5.2 Lung and others 57 6.8
 Lung and others 14 8.6 Liver 10 5.1 Liver 50 5.8
 Nasopharynx 12 5.9 Stomach 9 4.8 Larynx 47 5.4
 Other skin 8 3.9 Brain, nervous system 7 3.2 Mouth 29 3.1
 Larynx 7 3.7 Larynx 7 4.8 Nasopharynx 28 2.5
 Colon 6 3.3 Hypopharynx 6 3.9 Brain, nervous system 27 2.5
 Brain, nervous system 5 1.3 Rectum 5 2.7 Hypopharynx 26 3.2
 Tongue 5 3.0 Mouth 4 2.5 Myeloid leukaemia 19 1.5
 All sites 305 172.4 All sites 139 72.9 All sites 705 76.8
                 
Females
 Stomach 43 29.4 Breast 19 12.1 Cervix Uteri 88 10
 Cervix uteri 23 13.2 Lung and others 17 14.1 Breast 61 7.8
 Oesophagus 22 13.1 Cervix uteri 12 8 Oesophagus 50 6.8
 Breast 17 9.5 Oesophagus 9 6.3 Lung and others 45 7.2
 Liver 14 8.1 Stomach 8 6.2 Stomach 35 4.8
 Gallbladder and others 13 8.7 Liver 8 6.3 Ovary and others 29 3.5
 Lung and others 11 6.8 Gallbladder and others 7 5.9 Liver 29 3.9
 Ovary and others 10 6.4 Larynx 7 4.7 Gallbladder etc. 27 4
 Myeloid leukaemia 8 3.8 Bladder 6 5.1 Larynx 22 3.1
 Other skin 8 5.3 Other skin 5 4.2 Brain, Nervous Sys. 21 2.6
 All sites 238 147.4 All sites 162 111.9 All Sites 662 87.9

Supplementary Table III gives the number of cancers (all ages), relative frequencies (%), average annual crude, age-adjusted incidence rates (AAR), and proportion of microscopic verification (%) by site (ICD-10) and sex (2003–2008) of the PBCR, Sikkim. Supplementary Table IV gives the comparison of age-adjusted incidence rates (AAR) of common anatomical sites of cancer of PBCR, Sikkim with older PBCRs in India. Supplementary Figure 1 shows the comparison of AAR of stomach cancer of Sikkimese Bhutia population (2003–2008) with that of other countries (2008). Supplementary Figure 2 shows the comparison of AAR of oesophageal cancer of Sikkimese Bhutia population (2003–2008) with that of other countries (2008).

Discussion

Data on cancer patterns helps in determining the strategies for cancer control and prevention in different countries. It provides important information on the risk of different cancers especially in vulnerable ethnic groups in the population and is important in planning and evaluation of cancer prevention and early detection.

The average annual AARs of cancers of all anatomical sites in both males and females are lower than the older urban PBCRs of India but higher than the only rural registry of Barshi. The state of Sikkim covers both urban and rural areas. However, when site-specific comparison of AARs is done the AARs of both stomach and oesophageal cancers are higher in both sexes across all the other six PBCRs. Further breakdown of the AARs by ethnic group reveals that these rates for both stomach and oesophageal cancers are several fold higher than not only the other PBCRs but also that of the rest of the population of Sikkim. Stomach cancer AARs of 60.4 and 29.4 per 100 000 in males and females, respectively, of the Bhutia population is also higher than that of the highest AAR (55.4 in males and 24.4 in females) in Aizawl district reported among the PBCRs in India during this time period (National Cancer Registry Programme. Indian Council of Medical Research, 2010). International comparisons also show that the AARs of stomach cancer are higher than that of the rates in Japanese populations that have since many years reported the highest AARs in the world (Ferlay et al, 2010).

Such high rates of stomach cancer could be due to the fact that majority of the population of Sikkim consumes fermented foods like gundruk (dried and decayed leaves of mustard oil plant and spinach), sinki (radish that is decayed and dried) and kinema (fermented soya beans). The population, especially the Bhutias residing in rural areas, also consume salted and smoked fried meat. Alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking is also very prevalent among them. Consumption of country-made wine, also known as chang (local wine prepared by fermenting millet using yeast), along with dried smoked preserved meat is an age-old tradition especially in the Bhutia tribes. So far no study has investigated on prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infestation in Sikkim or the Bhutia population.

Ethnic population studies can give an insight into the type of cancers prevalent in that ethnic group. It is essential that in countries with a high incidence of stomach cancer, primary prevention should be promoted to reduce the disease burden. Testing and treatment of H. pylori in high incidence areas should be complemented with dietary modifications (Graham, 2000).

Prognosis for stomach cancer patients identified by screening may be better than for those identified by other means (Hanazaki et al, 1997). The advantage of this is that screening programmes and interventions can be planned accordingly in a focused population and bring down the cost drastically. This is especially very relevant in a low resource setting. However, this study also suggests the importance of undertaking case–control studies to look for the causes and vulnerability of the Bhutia ethnic group to cancer of the stomach.

Similar higher AAR is seen among men and women for cancer of oesophagus especially in the Bhutia population (male AAR-22.6 and female AAR-13.1). In India the incidence of oesophageal cancer is moderately high. Oesophageal cancer is the second most common cancer among males and the fourth most common cancer among females according to combined data from cancer registries in India (Gajalakshmi et al, 2001). Various foods and food additives have been studied for their association with this disease (Phukan et al, 2001).

Cancer of the nasopharynx in Bhutia males shows an AAR of 5.9 as compared with the AAR of 3.3 in males in entire Sikkim. This is higher than the AAR of the other countries and India. Consumption of salted fish, including partial fermentation and nitrosamine formation, has been especially associated with increased risk of nasopharyngeal cancer in South East Asia (IARC Monographs, 1993).

Liver cancer is a major health problem in developing countries. The highest incidences are recorded in China, Japan, and South East Asia. In both high and low incidence areas there is great variability in incidence among ethnic groups (Engstrom et al, 1997). In Bhutia males the AAR was 19.6 and in Bhutia females 8.1, which are comparatively higher than the other ethnic groups residing in Sikkim.

This is the first report of this kind after the establishment of PBCR in 2003. The ethnic variations bring to light the incidence and pattern of cancer of the stomach, oesophagus, liver, and nasopharynx among the Bhutia ethnic group of Sikkim. This gives an opportunity to take up case–control studies in the future. Apart from this the report indicates the need to take up screening programmes in the Bhutia population for cancers of the stomach (Miyamoto et al, 2007; Yoshihara et al, 2007).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Government of Sikkim, Directorate of Economic, Statistics, Monitoring and Evaluation (DESME), the Steering and Monitoring Committees of the National Cancer Registry Programme (ICMR), for their support. The study has been conducted by funds received from the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi under their long-term extramural project. We would like to thank the different sources of registration, registry of births and deaths for their support.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on British Journal of Cancer website (http://www.nature.com/bjc)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

References

  1. April F, Constance P, Andrew J, Kanagaratnam S, Leslie S, Max P, Sharon W (eds) (2000) International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edn. WHO: Geneva [Google Scholar]
  2. Baquet CR, Commiskey P, Meltzer S, Mishra SI (2005) Esophageal cancer epidemiolgy in blacks and whites: racial and gender disparities in incidence, mortality, survival rates and histology. J Natl Med Assoc 97(11): 1471–1478 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Census of India (1991) Series-1, Sikkim. Office of the Registrar General: New Delhi [Google Scholar]
  4. Census of India (2001) Provisional Population Totals, Series-1, Sikkim. Office of the Registrar General: New Delhi [Google Scholar]
  5. Cho NH, Moy CS, Davis F, Haenszel W, Ahn Y-O, Kim H (1996) Ethnic variation in the incidence of stomach cancer in Illinois, 1986–1988. Am J Epidemiol 144: 661–664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Engstrom PF, McGlynn K, Hoffman JP (1997) Primary neoplasm of the liver. In Weichselbaum RR Reds, Cancer Medicine, Holland JF, Bast RC, Morton DL, Frei E, Kufe DW (eds), Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, pp 1923–1938 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Globocan 2008,Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No.10, Lyon. International Agency for Research on Cancer: France [Google Scholar]
  8. Gajalakshmi V, Swaminathan R, Shanta V (2001) An independent survey to assess completeness of registration: Population Based Cancer Registry, Chennai, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2: 179–183 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Graham DY (2000) Helicobacter pylori infection is the primary cause of gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol 12: 90–97 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hanazaki K, Sodeyama H, Wakabayashi M, Hiyazaua M, Yokoyama S, Sode Y, Kawamura N, Miyazaki T, Ohtsuka M (1997) Surgical treatment of gastric cancers detected by mass screening. Hepatogastroentrology 44: 1126–1132 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. IARC (1993) Some Naturally Occurring Substances: Food Items and Constituents, Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines and Mycotoxins (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol.56). IARC Press: Lyon [Google Scholar]
  12. Jensen OM, Parkin DM, Maclenan R, Muir CS, Skeet RG (eds) (1991) Cancer Registration Principles and Methods No. 95. IARC: Lyon [Google Scholar]
  13. Lama, MP (1994) Sikkim: Society, Polity, Economy, Environment, Indus Publishing: New Delhi [Google Scholar]
  14. Menon NRM, Banerjea, D, West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (2005) Allied Publishers: Sikkim, pp 5–13. [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller BA, Chu KC, Hankey BF, Ries LAG (2008) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns among specific Asian and Pacific Islander populations in the U.S. Cancer Causes Control 19: 227–256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Miyamoto A, Kuriyama S, Nishino Y, Tsubono Y, Nakaya N, Ohmori K, Kurashima K, Shibuya D, Tsuji I (2007) Lower risk of death from gastric cancer among participants of gastric cancer screening in Japan: a Population Based Cohort Study. Prev Med 44: 12–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Muir CS, Waterhouse J, Mack T (1987) Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France. IARC Scientific Publication 88 [Google Scholar]
  18. Nandakumar A, Gupta PC, Gangadharan P, Visweswara RN (2005) Geographic pathology revisited: development of an Atlas of cancer in India. Int J Cancer 116: 740–754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. National Cancer Registry Programme. Indian Council of Medical Research (2010) Three Year Report of Population Based Cancer Registries. Bangalore, India [Google Scholar]
  20. Phukan RK, Chetia CK, Ali MS, Mahanta J (2001) Role of dietary habits in the development of oesophageal cancer in Assam, the north-eastern region of India. Nutr Cancer 39: 204–209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Risley HH (1928) The Gazetteer of Sikkim, pp 5–38. Low Price Publications: Delhi [Google Scholar]
  22. State Socioeconomic Census (2006). Department of Economic Statistic, Monitoring and Evaluation, Government of Sikkim: Gangtok, India [Google Scholar]
  23. Takiar R, Shobana B (2009) Cancer incidence rates and the problem of denominators-a new approach in Indian Cancer Registries. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 10: 123–126 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wiggins CL, Perdue DG, Henderson JA, Bruce MG, Lanier AP, Kelley JJ, Seals BF, Espey DK (2008) Gastric cancer among American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States, 1999–2004. Cancer Suppl 113(5): 1225–1233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yoshihara M, Hiyama T, Yosjida S, Ito M, Tanaka S, Watanabe Y, Haruma K (2007) Reduction in gastric cancer mortality by screening based on serum pepsinogen concentration: a case control study. J Scan Gastroentrol 42: 760–764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES