Abstract
All tunicates produce a cellulosic extracellular matrix external to the epidermis; this is the most remarkable character of the subphylum (Tunicata = Urochordata). In Ascidiacea and Thaliacea, two of the three classes of Tunicata, cellulose is the main component of the tunic matrix that covers the whole body. In Appendicularia, however, the animals do not possess a tunic, and instead secrete a feeding apparatus called a "house" that is composed of cellulose. In the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica, we found a unique intracellular matrix in the apical cytoplasm of the adult tail epidermis that appears to form a tough shell supporting the tail. Although some experimental data suggest that this matrix may contain cellulose, the composition is still unknown. The significance of the tunicate capacity for cellulose synthesis is briefly discussed.
Keywords: tail epidermis, animal cellulose, Appendicularia (= Larvacea), Chordata, Oikopleura dioica, tunic
Does the appendicularian epidermis contain intracellular cellulose?
Tunicata ( = Urochordata) is the only metazoan taxon whose members can synthesize cellulose fibrils.1-3 This unique animal group is a relative of the vertebrates; it is one of the three subphyla of the phylum Chordata, and recent molecular phylogenies based on genome sequencing have shown that Tunicata is the closest sister group to Vertebrata within the extant chordates (Fig. 1).4 Tunicata comprises three classes: Ascidiacea, Thaliacea, and Appendicularia ( = Larvacea). Appendicularia is a unique group with peculiar features such as the absence of a cellulosic integument (tunic), the production of a feeding apparatus made of cellulose (the house), and the presence of a permanent tail with a notochord and epidermal fins (Fig. 2). Appendicularians undoubtedly form a monophyletic group, but their exact phylogenetic position within the tunicates is a subject of debate. They are often proposed to be basal to the other tunicates,5-9 but several studies have suggested that appendicularians are more closely related to stolidobranch ascidians10,11 or aplousobranch ascidians.12,13 Therefore, whether the unique features in appendicularians were shared with the common ancestors of tunicates (and vertebrates) or they originally emerged in the appendicularian lineage remains an open question.
Figure 1.
Phylogeny of chordates and representative synapomorphies. Appendicularia is one of the three classes of the subphylum Tunicata.
Figure 2.

The appendicularian Oiopleura dioica, showing the house (lateral view). A tadpole-shaped individual consists of a trunk (tr) and tail (ta). The epidermis in the anterior trunk secretes the house with mesh for filtration (fl), and continuous beating of the tail causes water uptake into the house for collecting food particles. Scale bar, 0.5 mm.
The epidermal cells of ascidians and thaliaceans secrete cellulose fibrils to form an extracellular matrix called a tunic that completely covers the epidermis of larvae and adults. Ascidian larvae have an outer and inner tunic; the outer tunic is shed during metamorphosis from the swimming larval to sessile juvenile stages.14 Although appendicularians lack a tunic, they are able to secrete two types of cellulosic matrices,3,15 the larval envelope and the house, which may be equivalent to the outer and inner tunics, respectively, of ascidian larvae. While a single locus of the cellulose synthase gene (CesA) has been found in the genomes of two ascidian Ciona species,16,17 the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica has two CesA isoforms and each of the two genes are respectively involved in the synthesis of the larval envelope during embryogenesis, and the house in adults.15,18 The larval envelope is shed during metamorphosis from the swimming larva to the pelagic adult, at which point the animals start forming the house.19
The appendicularian house is secreted by epidermal cells in the anterior part of the trunk.20 In contrast, the apical cytoplasm of epidermal cells in the tail and the posterior part of the trunk of appendicularians contain a moderately electron-dense matrix (Fig. 3).12,15,21-24 Accordingly, the appendicularian epidermis can be categorized into two groups: 1) the epidermis involved in house production, and 2) the epidermis with the intracellular matrix. In the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica, thin sheets consisting of polygonal scale-like structures remain after alkaline treatment of the animals, and an ultrastructural study showed that the scale-like structure matches the intracellular matrix within each squamous epidermal cell (Fig. 4).15 In a related study, the matrix was always found in the tail epidermal cells except at the edges of the fins, and was never found in the larvae.24 Because the matrix layers on the right and left sides of the tail were not connected at the fine edges, flat sheets were always observed in the tail following the alkaline treatment of an individual, but no tubular envelope was observed.
Figure 3.
Transmission electron micrograph of the tail epidermal cell in an adult Oikopleura dioica. The thin epidermis attaches to muscle (mu) via the basal lamina (bl). The intracellular matrix layer (im) lines the apical membrane of the epidermal cell (ep).
Figure 4.
Schematic drawing of the epidermal cells of the adult tail in Oikopleura dioica based on light and electron microscope observations (Nakashima et al., 2011b).
In another study on O. dioica, the scale-like structures resulting from alkaline treatment were marked with a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) family 3 with a strong affinity for cellulose.15 Within the scale-like structures, a mesh marked with the CBM appeared to be embedded in the amorphous materials, and the mesh retained the CBM marker even after acetic/nitric acid hydrolysis (following Updegraff25), a process during which most organic compounds other than cellulose are broken down. These results support the hypothesis that the intracellular matrix in the tail epidermis contains cellulose; however, some of the other evidence does not support this idea. First, expression of the cellulose synthase gene(s) has not been detected in the tail epidermis. Second, neither electron diffraction nor Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic microscopy has demonstrated the presence of cellulose in the matrix, although amorphous materials in the matrix may have interfered with such analyses. Finally, CBM also binds to chitin,26 and whereas Updegraff’s treatment theoretically decomposes chitin, carbohydrate-binding proteinaceous materials are sometimes protected from complete degradation during treatment.
The cellulosic tunic completely covers the epidermis in ascidians and thaliaceans, suggesting that all epidermal cells are capable of cellulose synthesis. Interestingly, the production of the house and the presence of the matrix are mutually exclusive except within the cells at the edges of the fins in appendicularians. Therefore, the presence of intracellular cellulose in the tail epidermis is a compelling reason to consider the matrix to be equivalent to the tunic, but we lack sufficient evidence from which to draw a firm conclusion.
The tail epidermis as a tough, elastic shell supporting active movement
We proposed that the intracellular matrix layer acts to make the epidermis a tough and elastic shell for the permanent tail. The possession of a post-anal tail is a chordate synapomorphy (Fig. 1), but appendicularians are the only tunicate group with a permanent tail. In the other tunicates, the larval tail is absorbed into the body during metamorphosis into the sessile or planktonic adult forms. Appendicularians are planktonic and continuously beat their tails to move water into the house enclosure to collect food particles (Fig. 2). Moreover, they are swift swimmers when they shed the house, actively beating their tails. Therefore, the adult tail epidermis should be tough and elastic for withstanding the shear stress caused by active tail movement, a factor that cannot be ignored in an aquatic milieu with a low Reynolds number. In the adult tail, epidermal cells laterally bind via tight junctions, zonulae adhaerentes, and occasionally gap junctions (Fig. 4).21-24 The zonulae adhaerentes provide sufficiently tough attachments among the epidermal cells, and they appear to be connected to the intracellular matrix with microfilaments (Figs. 3, 4).24 In ascidians as well as appendicularians, epidermal cells in the larval tail have only tight junctions.12,14,24 This may indicate that multiple cell junctions and the intracellular matrix layer have evolved to facilitate the function of the adult tail in appendicularians.
What had tunicate lost instead of tunic, a cellulosic extracellular matrix?
Tunicates are one of the most successful taxa of both sessile and pelagic communities, and they are one of the major suspension feeders in the marine ecosystem. Blooms or outbreaks of tunicates can sometimes seriously impact local communities, particularly in the case of non-indigenous/invasive species. The capacity for cellulose synthesis was likely a principal influencing factor for tunicate diversification and their subsequent prosperity in marine environments. The tunic is a multi-functional integument providing or facilitating innate immunity, protection from predators and solar radiation, self–nonself recognition, algal symbiosis, and more.27 However, it is often bulky and unsuitable for active movement: all ascidians are sessile and thaliaceans usually drift with the current. Appendicularians are exceptional due to the absence of a tunic, and are consequently capable of dynamic motility. With the post-anal tail supported by the notochord, chordate ancestors were probably able to swim, crawl, or dig into the seabed. Apart from appendicularians, the tunicates lost the active motility that may have been retained by the ancestors of vertebrates.
Acknowledgments
This study was partially supported by grants-in-aid for young scientists (B) to KN (23780191) and AN (20770046 and 23770063) from MEXT, Japan, and the “International Research Hub Project for Climate Change and Coral Reef/Island Dynamics” to EH from the University of the Ryukyus.
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/cib/article/17757
References
- 1.Van Daele Y, Revol JF, Gaill F, Goffinet G. Characterization and supramolecular architecture of the cellulose-protein fibrils in the tunic of the sea peach (Halocynthia papillosa, Ascidiacea, Urochordata) Biology of the Cell. 1992;76:87–96. doi: 10.1016/0248-4900(92)90198-A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hirose E, Kimura S, Itoh T, Nishikawa J. Tunic morphology and cellulosic components of pyrosomas, doliolids, and salps (Thaliacea, Urochordata) Biol Bull. 1999;196:113–20. doi: 10.2307/1543173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kimura S, Ohshima C, Hirose E, Nishikawa J, Itoh T. Cellulose in the house of the appendicularian Oikopleura rufescens. Protoplasma. 2001;216:71–4. doi: 10.1007/BF02680133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Putnam NH, Butts T, Ferrier DEK, Furlong RF, Hellsten U, Kawashima T, et al. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature. 2008;453:1064–71. doi: 10.1038/nature06967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Holland LZ, Gorsky G, Fenaux R. Fertilization in Oikopleura dioica (Tunicata, Appendicularia): acrosome reaction, cortical reaction, and sperm-egg fusion. Zoomorphology. 1988;108:229–43. doi: 10.1007/BF00312223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Holland ND, Holland LZ. Fine structural study of the cortical reaction and formation of the egg coats in a lancelet, Branchiostoma floridae. Biol Bull. 1989;176:111–22. doi: 10.2307/1541578. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wada H. Evolutionary history of free-swimming and sessile lifestyles in urochordates as deduced from 18S rDNA molecular phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol. 1998;15:1189–94. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nishino A, Satoh N. The simple tail of chordates: phylogenetic significance of appendicularians. Genesis. 2001;29:36–45. doi: 10.1002/1526-968X(200101)29:1<36::AID-GENE1003>3.0.CO;2-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Chourrout D, Philippe H. Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Nature. 2006;439:965–8. doi: 10.1038/nature04336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zeng L, Swalla BJ. Molecular phylogeny of the protochordates: chordate evolution. Can J Zool. 2005;83:24–33. doi: 10.1139/z05-010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zeng L, Jacobs M, Swalla B. Coloniality has evolved once in stolidobranch ascidians. Integr Comp Biol. 2006;46:255–68. doi: 10.1093/icb/icj035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stach T. Ontogeny of the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica (Tunicata, Chordata) reveals characters similar to ascidian larvae with sessile adults. Zoomorphology. 2007;126:203–14. doi: 10.1007/s00435-007-0041-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stach T, Winter J, Bouquet JM, Chourrout D, Schnabel R. Embryology of a planktonic tunicate reveals traces of sessility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:7229–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710196105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Burighel P, Cloney R. Urochordata: Ascidiacea. In: Hemichordata, Chaetognatha, and the invertebrate chordates. Harrison F, Ruppert E, (Eds. Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, Vol. 15. New York: Wiley-Liss 1997; 221-347. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nakashima K, Nishino A, Horikawa Y, Hirose E, Sugiyama J, Satoh N. The crystalline phase of cellulose changes under developmental control in a marine chordate. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68:1623–31. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0556-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nakashima K, Yamada L, Satou Y, Azuma J, Satoh N. The evolutionary origin of animal cellulose synthase. Dev Genes Evol. 2004;214:81–8. doi: 10.1007/s00427-003-0379-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Matthysse AG, Deschet K, Williams M, Marry M, White AR, Smith WC. A functional cellulose synthase from ascidian epidermis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:986–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0303623101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sagane Y, Zech K, Bouquet JM, Schmid M, Bal U, Thompson EM. Functional specialization of cellulose synthase genes of prokaryotic origin in chordate larvaceans. Development. 2010;137:1483–92. doi: 10.1242/dev.044503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fenaux R. Life history of the Appendicularia. In: The Biology of Pelagic Tunicates. Bone Q (ed), Oxford: Oxford University Press 1998; 151-9. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Flood PR, Deibel D. The appendicularian house. In: The Biology of Pelagic Tunicates. Bone Q (ed), Oxford: Oxford University Press 1998; 105-24. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bone Q, Mackie GO. Skin impulses and locomotion in Oikopleura (Tunicata: Larvacea) Biol Bull. 1975;149:267–86. doi: 10.2307/1540527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bone Q. Epithelial action potentials in Oikopleura (Tunicata: Larvacea) J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 1985;156:117–23. doi: 10.1007/BF00610672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Burighel P, Lane NJ, Martinucci GB, Dallai R. Junctional diversity in two regions of the epidermis of Oikopleura dioica (Tunicata, Larvacea) Cell Tissue Res. 1989;257:529–35. doi: 10.1007/BF00221462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nakashima K, Nishino A, Hirose E. Forming a tough shell via an intracellular matrix and cellular junctions in the tail epidermis of Oikopleura dioica (Chordata: Tunicata: Appendicularia) Naturwissenschaften. 2011;98:661–9. doi: 10.1007/s00114-011-0815-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Updegraff DM. Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Anal Biochem. 1969;32:420–4. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2697(69)80009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Goldstein MA, Takagi M, Hashida S, Shoseyov O, Doi RH, Segel IH. Characterization of the cellulose-binding domain of the Clostridium cellulovorans cellulose-binding protein A. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:5762–8. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.18.5762-5768.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hirose E. Ascidian tunic cells: morphology and functional diversity of free cells outside the epidermis. Invertebr Biol. 2009;128:83–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2008.00153.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]



