Skip to main content
Cardiovascular Research logoLink to Cardiovascular Research
. 2012 Feb 10;94(1):96–104. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvs090

Activation of GPR30 attenuates diastolic dysfunction and left ventricle remodelling in oophorectomized mRen2.Lewis rats

Hao Wang 1, Jewell A Jessup 1, Marina S Lin 1, Clarissa Chagas 1, Sarah H Lindsey 2, Leanne Groban 1,3,*
PMCID: PMC3307382  PMID: 22328091

Abstract

Aims

GPR30 is a novel oestrogen receptor expressed in various tissues, including the heart. We determined the role of GPR30 in the maintenance of left ventricular (LV) structure and diastolic function after the surgical loss of ovarian hormones in the female mRen2.Lewis rat, a model emulating the cardiac phenotype of the post-menopausal woman.

Methods and results

Bilateral oophorectomy (OVX) or sham surgery was performed in study rats; the selective GPR30 agonist, G-1 (50 µg/kg/day), or vehicle was given subcutaneously to OVX rats from 13–15 weeks of age. Similar to the cardiac phenotype of sham rats, G-1 preserved diastolic function and structure relative to vehicle-treated OVX littermates independent of changes in blood pressure. G-1 limited the OVX-induced increase in LV filling pressure, LV mass, wall thickness, interstitial collagen deposition, atrial natriuretic factor and brain natriuretic peptide mRNA levels, and cardiac NAD(P)H oxidase 4 (NOX4) expression. In vitro studies showed that G-1 inhibited angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy in H9c2 cardiomyocytes, evidenced by reductions in cell size, protein content per cell, and atrial natriuretic factor mRNA levels. The GPR30 antagonist, G15, inhibited the protective effects of both oestradiol and G-1 on this hypertrophy.

Conclusion

These data show that the GPR30 agonist G-1 mitigates the adverse effects of oestrogen loss on LV remodelling and the development of diastolic dysfunction in the study rats. This expands our knowledge of the sex-specific mechanisms underlying diastolic dysfunction and provides a potential therapeutic target for reducing the progression of this cardiovascular disease process in post-menopausal women.

Keywords: Cardiac hypertrophy, Diastolic dysfunction, GPR30, mRen2.Lewis rat, Post-menopausal women

1. Introduction

The prevalence of diastolic dysfunction dramatically increases in post-menopausal women.1 Unlike men of equivalent age, post-menopausal women predominantly exhibit impairments in diastolic function with concentric left ventricular (LV) remodelling and eventual diastolic heart failure rather than systolic dysfunction, eccentric remodelling, and systolic heart failure.2 Diastolic heart failure, also known as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, accounts for 40–60% of chronic heart failure cases in industrialized nations,3 and over 75% of these cases are in older women.4 Hospital admissions for diastolic heart failure have increased steadily over the past two decades, with female patients having the highest annual percentage increase in hospitalization rates when compared with males with heart failure.3 This may be due in part to delayed diagnoses of heart failure in women compared with men.5,6 In addition, the prevalence and prognostic impact of its precursor, diastolic dysfunction, has only recently been recognized and the mechanisms are not yet clear.7

Evidence suggests that the loss of oestrogens contributes to the development of hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy in post-menopausal women;810 and these diseases are risk factors for diastolic dysfunction.11,12 While the prevalence of hypertension rises with age for both genders, the near doubling in the prevalence of hypertension in women aged 70–79 compared with those aged 50–59 may be attributed, in part, to the decline in oestrogen during menopause.13,14 Moreover, the evolution of LV hypertrophy differs between pre- and post-menopausal women, with a greater induction of hypertrophy when circulating oestrogen levels are reduced.15 Experimental studies in adult female rats show that ovariectomy eliminates female-specific protection against volume-induced cardiac hypertrophy and remodelling,16 while oestradiol administration attenuates hypertrophy associated with pressure overload17 and ageing.18 Although activation of the classical oestrogen receptors (ER)-α and ER-β located on myocytes, fibroblasts, and the extracellular matrix might be involved in oestrogen-mediated cardioprotection,19 the exact mechanisms for the beneficial effects of oestrogen on cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and diastolic dysfunction remain unclear.

With the recent discovery of the G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor (GPR30) in the heart,12,20 the potential mechanisms for oestrogen-mediated cardioprotection are expanded. GPR30, also known as GPER, is located on the cell membrane and endoplasmic reticulum,21,22 and is widely distributed, independent of species and sex, among a variety of mammalian tissues including the heart, lung, liver, adrenal gland, intestine, ovary, and brain.23,24 GPR30 activation by its specific agonist, G-1, improves contractile function and reduces infarct size in isolated rat and mouse hearts subjected to ischaemia/reperfusion injury.20,2527 We found increased cardiac GPR30 mRNA levels in the female mRen2.Lewis rat following chronic consumption of a high-salt diet12 or surgically induced oestrogen loss (see Supplementary material online). Further studies from our laboratory show that in vivo activation of GPR30, with G-1, attenuates the adverse effects of high salt on diastolic function and cardiac remodelling.12 Indeed, endogenous oestrogens could have contributed to the anti-remodelling and lusitropic benefits following high salt consumption,28 since oestradiol binds GPR30 at an affinity similar to G-1.29 Nonetheless, these data support the notion that cardiac GPR30 is increased during periods of physiological and pathophysiological stress, and that its activation could provide valuable cardioprotection.

Therefore, using the oophorectomized (OVX) mRen2.Lewis rat, an established rodent model that mimics the cardiac phenotype of women following surgical or natural cessation of ovarian hormone production,28,3034 we hypothesized that GPR30 activation by G-1 preserves diastolic function and mitigates cardiac remodelling following the loss of oestrogens.

2. Methods

2.1. Animals

Female mRen2.Lewis rats were obtained from the Hypertension and Vascular Research Center Congenic Colony at Wake Forest School of Medicine and all studies were approved by the institution's Animal Care and Use Committee. All animal procedures conformed to the Guide to the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health. Rats were individually housed in an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care-approved, temperature (22 ± 2°C) and light (12 h light/dark cycle) controlled facility with ad libitum access food and water.

2.2. Experimental protocol

At 4 weeks of age, rats were randomly assigned to undergo either OVX (n = 16) or sham operation (Sham; n = 10) performed under 2% isoflurane anaesthesia, as previously described.30,31 The adequacy of anaesthesia was monitored by observation of slow breathing, loss of muscular tone, and no response to surgical manipulation. The success of OVX and the subsequent depletion of circulating oestrogens were confirmed using a serum oestradiol assay (5 pg/mL detection limit; Polymedco, Cortlandt Manor, NY, USA) at the end of the experiment (data not shown). Once the rats reached 13 weeks of age, the OVX group was further randomly divided to receive either the GPR30 agonist, G-1, (OVX-G1; n = 7; Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) diluted in a DMSO/EtOH12 mixture for a targeted dose of 50 mcg/kg/day or the DMSO/EtOH vehicle (OVX-V; n = 9) and were administered subcutaneously via osmotic mini-pumps (DURECT Corporation, Cupertino, CA, USA). This dose of G-1 was determined by an initial pilot study conducted in our laboratory that demonstrated lusitropic effectiveness without significant blood pressure reductions (Figure 1). Weekly body weight and systolic blood pressures by tail-cuff plethysmography (NIBP-LE5001, Panlab, Barcelona, Spain) were monitored throughout the study. Rats were euthanized via exsanguination by cardiac puncture while under ketamine/xylazine anaesthesia (ketamine HCL 60 mg/kg and xylazine HCL 5 mg/kg) at 15 weeks of age, following echocardiographic evaluation. Whole hearts were isolated and further dissected to isolate the left ventricle, right ventricle, and atria. Tissue weights and tibial lengths were measured with an analytical scale and a micrometer, respectively. The left ventricle was cut into pieces for RNA, western blot, and histological analyses.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Tail-cuff systolic blood pressure in conscious, sham-operated and ovariectomized female mRen2.Lewis rats treated with G-1 or vehicle for 2 weeks. Values are means ± SEM; OVX, ovariectomized; V, vehicle. *P< 0.05 vs. sham. n = 7–10/group.

2.3. Echocardiographic evaluation

LV function and dimensions were assessed prior to the protocol termination in anaesthetized (ketamine/xylazine: 80/12 mg/kg) animals using a Philips 5500 echocardiograph (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA, USA) and a 12 MHz phased array probe as previously described.12,28,30,31

2.4. Determination of collagen deposition in the heart

LV specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded into paraffin blocks; 4 μm sections were stained with picrosirius red, as previously described.30,31 Images were captured using an Axiovert 200 microscope (Thornwood, NY, USA). The ratio of collagen-stained pixels to unstained pixels was quantified using NIH ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/).

2.5. Cardiomyocyte size measurement

Cardiomyocyte cross-sectional areas were measured in paraffin-embedded LV sections. Alexa Flour 488-conjugated wheat germ agglutinin (WGA, 10 µg/mL, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was employed to delineate cellular membranes. TO-PRO-3 (1/1000 dilution, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used for nuclear staining. Images were captured using a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope (Thornwood, NY, USA) and analysed with Zeiss LSM Image Browser (version 3,2,0,70). For each section, at least 300 round cells with centrally located nuclei were measured, and the average value was used as the final cardiomyocyte size.

2.6. Immunofluorescence staining and immunocytochemistry analysis

Immunofluorescent staining of heart sections and immunocytochemistry in cultured cells were performed using standard procedures. Images were captured using a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope. For detailed methodology, please refer to the Supplementary material online.

2.7. Cell culture and treatment

The H9c2 myoblast cell line, derived from embryonic rat heart, was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Gibco) with 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 mg/mL), at 37°C in 5% CO2 and 95% air, at a relative humidity of 95% and split 1:4 at subconfluence (80%). Before each experiment, cells were seeded in six-well plates or chamber slides (Lab-Tek™ Chamber Slides: Thermo Scientific NUNC 177437) at the density of 5 × 104 cells/cm2 and starved for 18 h in DMEM containing 0.1% FBS. Cells were subsequently treated with angiotensin II (Ang II, 10−7M, Bachem), oestradiol (E2) (10−7M, Sigma), G-1 (10−7M, Cayman Chemical Company), G15 (10−6M, Tocris Bioscience).

After an additional 24-h incubation, cells were fixed with cold ethanol for immunocytochemical staining, lysed with TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for real-time (RT)–PCR analysis, or trypsinized for protein analysis. Protein content was determined using a Biorad protein assay kit (Hercules, CA, USA).

2.8. Analysis of gene expression by quantitative real-time PCR

RT–PCR was used to detect gene mRNA levels in cardiac tissue or H9c2 cells. For detailed methodology, please refer to the Supplementary material online.

2.9. Western blot analysis

LV tissue homogenates were separated by SDS–PAGE and transferred onto membranes as described previously.12,31 Immunoblots were probed using antibodies for NAD(P)H 4 (NOX4) (2 µg/mL; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) collagen I (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), collagen III (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1) (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), sarcoplasmic endoplasmic reticulum ATPase (SERCA2;1:1000; Abcam), and phospholamban (PLB) (1:5000; Abcam). The PLB-to-SERCA2 ratio was used as a measure of SERCA2 inhibition. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; 1:5,000; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) was used as a loading control. The bands were digitized using MCID image analysis software (Imaging Research, Inc., Ontario, Canada). Each band was expressed in arbitrary units and normalized to its own GAPDH.

2.10. Statistical analyses

All results were expressed as mean ± SEM. For all endpoints, one-way ANOVA evaluated significant effects among the groups. Significant interactions between the groups were further characterized using Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc analyses. Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Blood pressure changes during the experiment

Consistent with our previous studies,28,30,31 loss of ovarian hormones exacerbated hypertension in the female mRen2.Lewis rat. At 13 weeks of age, systolic blood pressure was 173 ± 6 mmHg in OVX rats vs. 147 ± 3 mmHg in intact littermates (P< 0.001). Since chronic G-1 treatment, at the dose of 400 µg/kg/day, has significant blood pressure lowering effects in this strain,34 and since afterload is an important factor that affects diastolic function and myocardial relaxation,35 we conducted a pilot study to determine the ideal lusitropic dose of G-1, as determined by tissue Doppler mitral annular descent (e′) that did not alter blood pressure (Figure 1). Accordingly, we chose to chronically administer G-1 at 50 µg/kg/day, as <100 µg/kg/day of G-1 had no effect on blood pressure (data not shown). Serial systolic blood pressures during the 2-week treatment period were not different between OVX-vehicle and OVX-G-1 treated rats, but both OVX-groups had significantly higher blood pressures compared with their oestrogen-intact littermates at each time-point (Figure 1).

3.2. G-1 attenuated the adverse effects of oestrogen loss on diastolic function

In the present study, we found that cardiac GPR30 mRNA levels were increased by 60% in OVX rats when compared with sham-operated littermates (see Supplementary material online, Figure S1). We evaluated the cardioprotective potential of GPR30 activation by its agonist, G-1, in OVX-mRen2.Lewis rats using both conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography. While overt differences in the early-to-late (E/A) transmitral Doppler filling ratios were not observed among groups (P = 0.08; see Supplementary material online, Table S1), the 2-week subcutaneous infusion of G-1 attenuated the decrease in myocardial relaxation (e′), increase in Doppler-derived left ventricle filling pressures (E/e′), and increase in cardiac gene expression of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) that occurred following the surgical loss of oestrogens in this strain (Figure 2). Systolic function, as determined by per cent fractional shortening and velocity of circumferential fibre shortening (Vcf), was not affected by the loss of oestrogens or the administration of G-1 (Figure 2B and Table 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Representative transmitral and tissue Doppler images of sham and OVX mRen2.Lewis female rats receiving either vehicle or G-1 treatment for 2 weeks. (B) Per cent fractional shortening. (C) Early mitral annular velocity (e′). (D) The ratio of transmitral early filling-to-early mitral annular descent (E/e′), or index of filling pressures. (E and F) Cardiac brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) mRNA levels. Values are mean ± SEM; *P< 0.05 vs. sham, #P< 0.05 vs. OVX-vehicle. n = 7–10/group.

Table 1.

Heart weight, heart rate, and echocardiography parameters

Sham OVX-V OVX-G1
N 10 9 7
Heart rate (b.p.m.) 246 ± 8 242 ± 9 244 ± 9
Body weight (g) 232 ± 17 254 ± 17 264 ± 9
HW/TL (mg/mm) 16.3 ± 0.7 19.6 ± 0.8* 16.6 ± 0.3**
LVESd (cm) 0.39 ± 0.02 0.39 ± 0.02 0.44 ± 0.03
LVEDd (cm) 0.68 ± 0.02 0.69 ± 0.01 0.70 ± 0.03
RWT 0.49 ± 0.04 0.65 ± 0.03* 0.51 ± 0.04**
LV mass 0.36 ± 0.03 0.66 ± 0.06* 0.43 ± 0.06**
Vcf 3.92 ± 0.26 3.63 ± 0.23 3.71 ± 0.24

HW/TL, heart weight/tibial length; LVESd, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; LVEDd, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; RWT, relative wall thickness; LV mass, left ventricular mass; Vcf, velocity of circumferential fibre shortening. Data are mean ± SEM.

*P < 0.05 vs. sham.

**P < 0.05 vs. OXV-V.

3.3. G-1 attenuated the effect of oestrogen loss on hypertrophic and extracellular LV remodelling

The early surgical loss of oestrogen (at 4 weeks of age) led to significant increases in heart weight and left ventricle weight by 15 weeks of age (Table 1 and Figure 3). The whole heart weight increased by 20% and the LV weight increased by 14% in the OVX- compared with sham-operated rats (P< 0.05). Interestingly, 2 weeks of G-1 attenuated the effect of ovarian hormone loss on heart weight. (Table 1, Figure 3C). These findings are consistent with echocardiographic-derived morphometric observations. In the hearts of OVX rats, the posterior and anterior wall thicknesses, relative wall thickness, and LV mass were significantly increased when compared with measures from the sham-operated group. These increases were also mitigated by 2 weeks of G-1 treatment (Table 1, Figure 3A and B). Moreover, cardiomyocyte size was significantly increased in OVX- vs. oestrogen-intact rats, and this effect was inhibited by G-1 (Figure 3D and E).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A and B) Echocardiographic-derived posterior (left) and anterior (right) LV wall thicknesses. (C) Heart weight of rats. (D) Quantification of cardiomyocyte size. (E) Representative confocal imagines showing wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) membrane and TO-PRO-3 nuclear staining in the left ventricular cardiomyocytes from sham, OVX-V, and OVX-G-1 rats. Values are mean ± SEM; * P< 0.05 vs. sham, #P< 0.05 vs. OVX-vehicle. n = 7–10/group.

Consistent with our previous findings,28,30,31 collagen deposition was significantly enhanced in LV sections from OVX-mRen2.Lewis rats when compared with sham-operated littermates (OVX: 5.7 ± 0.4% vs. Sham: 4.3 ± 0.4%, P< 0.05). This increase in interstitial fibrosis was attenuated by G-1 (OVX-G-1: 5.0 ± 0.4% vs. OVX-V: 5.7 ± 0.4%, P< 0.05) (Figure 4A). In hearts from OVX rats, collagen III protein expression was increased and collagen I was decreased when compared with hearts from sham-operated rats. These changes were attenuated in hearts from G-1 treated rats (Figure 4B). In addition, cardiac TGF-β1 mRNA was significantly increased by OVX and attenuated by G-1 (see Supplementary material online, Figure S2B). Likewise, TGF-β1 protein expression was increased in hearts from OVX rats and attenuated by G-1 (see Supplementary material online, Figure S2A).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Upper panel: representative LV images, in each group, of collagen deposition (×200 magnification); lower panel: quantification of collagen deposition. Values are mean ± SEM; *P< 0.05 vs. sham, #P< 0.05 vs. OVX-vehicle. n = 5–6/group. (B) Pictures from western blot showing cardiac collagen I and collagen III protein expression.

3.4. G-1 inhibited the increase in cardiac NOX4 associated with oestrogen loss

In the hypertrophied hearts from OVX-mRen2.Lewis rats, we found that NOX4 mRNA was increased by 80% when compared with sham-operated rats. Importantly, this increase in cardiac NOX4 mRNA was inhibited by G-1 (Figure 5A). Consistent with these changes in gene levels, cardiac NOX4 protein was also increased with OVX and attenuated by G-1 (Figure 5B and C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Cardiac NOX4 mRNA levels. (B) NOX4 protein expression. Upper panel: representative pictures from western blot; lower panel: quantification with densitometry and corrected by internal control GAPDH expression. (C) Representative confocal images of double-staining for desmin (red) and NOX4 (green) in left ventricle of rats in sham, OVX-V, and OVX-G-1 groups. The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue) (×200 magnification). Values are mean ± SEM; *P< 0.05 vs. sham; #P< 0.05 vs. OVX-V.

RT–PCR did not reveal differences in the cardiac mRNA levels of NOX2, p22phox, and p47phox (see Supplementary material online, Figure S3).

3.5. Calcium-related gene expression in the heart

Cardiac mRNA levels of sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA) 2, PLB, sodium-calcium exchanger 1 (NCX1), NCX3, calsequestrin 1 (CASQ1), CASQ2, triadin, cardiac ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2), calreticulin, and calmodulin-1 were similar across all groups (see Supplementary material online, Figure S3). Likewise, the PLB-to-SERCA2 protein ratio, an index of SERCA2 inhibition, was not significantly influenced by ovarian hormonal withdrawal or G-1 treatment (see Supplementary material online, Figure S4).

3.6. Protective effects of GPR30 on angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy in H9c2 cardiomyocytes

To better understand the hypertrophic limiting capacity of GPR30, we used H9c2 cardiomyocytes treated with angiotensin II (Ang II) (Figure 6). Consistent with previous reports,36 Ang II (10−7M) treatment for 24 h induced hypertrophy in H9c2 cardiomyocytes, demonstrated by increases in cell size (Figure 6A), protein content per cell (Figure 6C), and ANF mRNA levels (Figure 6B). These indicators of cell hypertrophy were significantly inhibited following treatment with either E2 or G-1 (10−7 M). This anti-remodelling effect of E2 was partially prevented by co-incubation with the GPR30 antagonist G15 (10−6M), while the protective effect of G-1 on cell size was completely blocked by G15 (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Activation of GPR30 inhibits angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy in H9c2 cardiomyocytes. Cell hypertrophy was determined by (A) cell size, (B) ANF mRNA levels, and (C) protein content per cell. Data represent mean ± SEM. *P< 0.05 vs. vehicle; #P< 0.05 vs. angiotensin II. n = 4/group.

4. Discussion

The most important findings of this study are that chronic GPR30 activation by its agonist G-1 for 2 weeks attenuated the adverse effects of ovariectomy on diastolic function and LV remodelling in the female mRen2.Lewis rat. Importantly, this GPR30-mediated lusitropic and anti-remodelling effect occurred in the absence of a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure. Together with our previous data from the oestrogen-intact-mRen2.Lewis rat fed a high-salt diet,12 these observations provide evidence that an increase in GPR30 receptor expression in the heart may contribute to cardiac functional and structural stability during periods of physiological (e.g. oestrogen loss) and pathophysiological stress (e.g. high salt intake). Given the cardioprotective reports of G-1 in other animal models and strains,20,2527,37 our findings are unlikely exclusive to the female mRen2.Lewis rat.

The adult mRen2.Lewis female rat, a congenic rodent model of angiotensin II- and oestrogen-dependent hypertension,32 consistently manifest elevations in systolic blood pressure, LV hypertrophy, and diastolic functional impairments when ovariectomy occurs between 4 and 5 weeks of age.26,3032 Our approach of initiating treatment after the establishment of the exacerbated hypertension is practical as it emulates the cardiovascular phenotype of both pre- and post-menopausal women after the surgical or natural cessation of ovarian hormone production.15,38 While others have shown that non-selective ER stimulation using oestradiol attenuates the development of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis,19 our study using the selective agonist G-129 strongly suggests that the cardiac GPR30 receptor is involved in the maintenance of LV structure and function, particularly in females.

LV hypertrophy commonly occurs in women after the cessation of ovarian oestrogen production39 and is an independent risk factor for the development of ventricular stiffness and impaired myocardial relaxation.40 In rodent studies, cardioprotective and anti-hypertrophic oestrogenic effects have been well described. In adult rats, ovariectomy inhibits female-specific protection against pressure-induced hypertrophic remodelling16 and attenuates the effect of age on ventricular remodelling,18 while oestradiol replacement reverses these effects.17,18 Consistent with these studies and our own,3032 OVX-mRen2.Lewis rats exhibited increased myocyte cell size, ventricular wall thickness, and LV weight compared with oestrogen-intact littermates. One striking and novel finding from our in vivo study was that administration of G-1, the selective agonist for the G protein-coupled membrane ER GPR30, attenuated hypertrophic remodelling without affecting blood pressure. These favourable effects of GPR30 activation were further corroborated in H9c2 cultured cardiomyocytes where G-1 reversed Ang-II mediated increases in cell size, ANF expression, and cell protein content. While additional studies are needed to determine the signalling pathways associated with GPR30-mediated reductions in cardiomyocyte size, our data strongly suggest that GPR30 activation with G-1 preserves diastolic function after oestrogen loss, in part by attenuating hypertrophic remodelling.

Cardiac collagen deposition not only contributes to hypertrophic remodelling, it directly influences LV compliance and, subsequently, diastolic function.41 In this study and our previous studies,28,30,31 oestrogen loss by early ovariectomy in the mRen2.Lewis strain led to interstitial and perivascular fibrosis with associated increases in Doppler-derived filling pressures (E/e′). In the absence of overt valvular heart disease or atrial arrhythmias, increases in LV filling pressure, or E/e′, are indicative of increased LV chamber stiffness, advanced diastolic dysfunction, and worsening clinical outcomes.42 Different lines of evidence indicate that oestrogens influence the extracellular matrix in the heart, specifically the collagens. In vitro studies show that oestradiol suppresses rat cardiac fibroblast proliferation along with their capacity to produce collagen.43 In aged rats, ovariectomy leads to increased collagen I, reduced collagen III, and metalloproteinase 2 (which degrades collagen), all of which are reversed by oestrogen replacement.18 Surprisingly, in mRen2.Lewis rats, early ovariectomy reduced cardiac collagen I and increased collagen III suggesting that the changes in extracellular matrix remodelling following oestrogen loss might be age- and strain-dependent. In 8-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to volume overload, collagen I is reduced while collagen III tended to be elevated.44 In this same experimental model of volume overload, ovariectomy had no effect on either type of cardiac collagen.44 Our present data suggest that 9 weeks following ovariectomy, a chronic 2-week subcutaneous infusion of G-1 inhibited interstitial myocardial fibrosis and improved Doppler-derived filling pressures in OVX-G-1 rats when compared with ovary-intact littermates. Although we do not yet know the mechanism by which GPR30 influences cardiac collagen deposition and cardiac stiffness, further investigations in cultured cardiac fibroblasts will help clarify the GPR30-related signalling pathways involved in mitigating fibroblast proliferation and collagen production.

Changes in the content and isoforms of proteins involved intracellular Ca2+ handling could also contribute to impairments in myocardial relaxation, and result in diastolic dysfunction.45 SERCA2 and PLB are two key proteins involved in calcium re-uptake into the sarcoplasmic reticulum, and subsequent maintenance of lusitropic function.45 Unlike our findings in the hypertensive male mRen2.Lewis rat,46 we have not observed overt differences in SERCA2 or PLB protein expression following ovariectomy of the mRen2 female, consistent with other observations.47,48 Likewise, in the current study, we did not find differences in either SERCA2 or PLB mRNA levels among OVX-vehicle, OVX-G-1, and sham-operated mRen2.Lewis rats. Although oestrogen has been shown to alter the L-type Ca2+ channel and the Na/Ca exchanger,49,50 cardiac mRNA levels of these and several other calcium-related regulatory proteins, including ryanodine-2, calreticulin, and calmodulin-1, were not affected by oestrogen loss or G-1 administration. Indeed, other mechanisms that modulate LV relaxation, such as cardiac bioenergetics, conformation of the cytoskeleton, or titin isoform expression could be involved in the improved lusitropic function induced by G-1.51,52

The downstream signalling mechanisms of GPR30 in the heart are still unclear. Acute ex vivo studies show that G-1 inhibits Akt and Erk pathways which become activated by ischaemia and reperfusion injury.20 The present study shows that G-1 attenuated the up-regulation of NOX4 in OVX-rat hearts. NOX4 expression is increased by hypertrophic stimuli, including angiotensin II, and mediates cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure induced by pressure overload and chronic angiotensin II treatment.53 Therefore, NOX4 may also play an important role in LV remodelling in the female mRen2.Lewis rat, an established model of oestrogen and angiotensin II-sensitive hypertension.32 Since NOX4 is known to be a significant source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the failing heart,54 future studies evaluating cardiac ROS production will be required to determine whether the loss of endogenous activation of cardiac GPR30 or the interaction between angiotensin II and cardiac GPR30 signalling leads to an increase in oxidative stress, and subsequent NOX4-related hypertrophic remodelling.

4.1. Limitations of this study

Subcutaneous administration of a selective GPR30 agonist was used to determine the role of this receptor in the maintenance of LV structure and diastolic function. Although our dose of G-1 had no overt effect on blood pressure, we cannot exclude the possibility that G-1 has some other systemic action that could indirectly alter vascular haemodynamics and subsequently improve cardiac structure and diastolic function.46 The presence and content of G-1 in the heart after subcutaneous administration was not determined in this study. However, evidence strongly suggests that the cardiac effects of G-1 occur mainly through its activation of GPR30 in the heart: (i) data show the presence of GPR30 in the heart (see Supplementary material online, Figure S1 and Ref.12) and the high affinity and specificity of G-1 to GPR30;29 and (ii) exogenous administration of G-1 is commonly used to study the roles of cardiac GPR30 in both ex vivo studies20,2527 and in vivo studies,12 without leading to confounding factors as reported in the GPR30 knockout model.55 Although no specific myocardial phenotypic changes were reported in the global GPR30 knockout mouse,55 studies using conditional cardiomyocyte-specific GPR30 knockout animals will be needed to determine the exact physiological functions of GPR30 in the female heart. A second limitation is that early ovariectomy in the mRen2.Lewis female does not address the age-related changes that also influence the cardiac diastolic dysfunction phenotype of older women. Indeed, a more hormonally relevant model mimicking human menopause might be useful in future studies.56 Thirdly, although tissue Doppler echocardiography is a well-accepted methodology for the clinical assessment of lusitropic function, other load-independent approaches, such as cardiac catheterization with pressure–volume analyses, could provide more quantitative information of diastolic function in the experimental setting.

4.2. Clinical implications

Preclinical studies support the potential benefits of oestrogen therapy in reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases.16,32,57,58 Oestrogen replacement therapy in hypertensive post-menopausal women has also been shown to diminish cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy.10,59 However, oestrogen replacement therapy remains controversial given that data from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI)60 and the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS)61 did not show protective cardiovascular benefits in older women who received conjugated equine oestrogen (Premarin® Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New York, NY, USA) with or without synthetic progestins (medroxyprogesterone acetate) well after the onset of menopause. Prior to halting the hormone replacement arms of the WHI study, there was an increased risk for myocardial events and strokes among the oestrogen-replete post-menopausal women.60 Similarly, the HERS study found an increased risk for thromboembolic events in a large group of hormone-replaced post-menopausal women with established coronary disease.62,63 Fortunately, it does not appear that the increased cardiovascular risks, including myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and venous thrombosis risks persist once hormone replacement is discontinued.64,65 Preclinical data also suggest that late-in-life oestrogen may adversely influence cardiovascular risk. Specifically, ovariectomy in mid-aged mRen2.Lewis female rats conveyed protection against salt-induced renal damage when compared with oestrogen-intact littermates.66 Certainly, in order to ascertain the appropriate composition of oestrogens, source, dosage, and the therapeutic window for perimenopausal women, more studies focused on the dynamic relationship between oestrogens and the cardiovascular system are needed.

Despite a disease continuum of great clinical importance and urgency, diastolic dysfunction in post-menopausal women is not well understood and its medical management remains largely empirical. Herein, using a reverse translational rodent model that emulates the cardiovascular phenotype of women after the surgical or natural cessation of ovarian hormonal production,67,68 we conclude that the loss of endogenous GPR30 activation in the heart could provoke enhanced deposition of interstitial collagen and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, eventually leading to diastolic dysfunction. The improved myocardial relaxation, reduced filling pressures, and anti-remodelling that occurred with the administration of a highly specific GPR30 agonist, late after ovariectomy, further reveals the importance of the GPR30 receptor in the maintenance of female-sex-specific cardiac function and structure.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Cardiovascular Research online.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health R01-AG033727-03 (to L.G.).

Conflict of interest: none declared.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

References

  • 1.Oberman A, Prineas RJ, Larson JC, LaCroix A, Lasser NL. Prevalence and determinants of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy among a multiethnic population of postmenopausal women (The Women's Health Initiative) Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:512–519. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ceia F, Fonseca C, Mota T, Morais H, Matias F, de Sousa A, et al. Prevalence of chronic heart failure in Southwestern Europe: the EPICA study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002;4:531–539. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(02)00034-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:251–259. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Masoudi FA, Havranek EP, Smith G, Fish RH, Steiner JF, Ordin DL, et al. Gender, age, and heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:217–223. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02696-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jessup M, Piña IL. Is it important to examine gender differences in the epidemiology and outcome of severe heart failure? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:1247–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Harjai KJ, Nunez E, Stewart Humphrey J, Turgut T, Shah M, Newman J. Does gender bias exist in the medical management of heart failure? Int J Cardiol. 2000;75:65–69. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(00)00298-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Burnett JC, Jr, Mahoney DW, Bailey KR, Rodeheffer RJ. Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. JAMA. 2003;289:194–202. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.2.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Agabiti-Rosei E, Muiesan ML. Left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure in women. J Hypertens Suppl. 2002;20:S34–S38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cheng S, Xanthakis V, Sullivan LM, Lieb W, Massaro J, Aragam J, et al. Correlates of echocardiographic indices of cardiac remodeling over the adult life course: longitudinal observations from the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2010;122:570–578. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.937821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Modena MG, Molinari R, Muia N, Jr, Castelli A, Pala F, Rossi R. Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study of transdermal estrogen replacement therapy on hypertensive postmenopausal women. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12:1000–1008. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00074-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fak AS, Erenus M, Tezcan H, Caymaz O, Oktay S, Oktay A. Effects of a single dose of oral estrogen on left ventricular diastolic function in hypertensive postmenopausal women with diastolic dysfunction. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:66–71. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00451-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jessup JA, Lindsey SH, Wang H, Chappell MC, Groban L. Attenuation of salt-induced cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction by the GPER agonist G-1 in female mRen2.Lewis rats. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barton M, Meyer MR. Postmenopausal hypertension: mechanisms and therapy. Hypertension. 2009;54:11–18. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.120022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McCubbin JA, Helfer SG, Switzer FS, III, Price TM. Blood pressure control and hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women at risk for coronary heart disease. Am Heart J. 2002;143:711–717. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.121262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Garavaglia GE, Messerli FH, Schmieder RE, Nunez BD, Oren S. Sex differences in cardiac adaptation to essential hypertension. Eur Heart J. 1989;10:1110–1114. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brower GL, Gardner JD, Janicki JS. Gender mediated cardiac protection from adverse ventricular remodeling is abolished by ovariectomy. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003;251:89–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.van Eickels M, Grohé C, Cleutjens JP, Janssen BJ, Wellens HJ, Doevendans PA. 17beta-estradiol attenuates the development of pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circulation. 2001;104:1419–1423. doi: 10.1161/hc3601.095577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu Y, Arenas IA, Armstrong SJ, Davidge ST. Estrogen modulation of left ventricular remodeling in the aged heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;57:388–394. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00705-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grohé C, Kahlert S, Löbbert K, Stimpel M, Karas RH, Vetter H, et al. Cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts contain functional estrogen receptors. FEBS Lett. 1997;416:107–112. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01179-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Deschamps AM, Murphy E. Activation of a novel estrogen receptor, GPER, is cardioprotective in male and female rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297:H1806–H1813. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00283.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Filardo E, Quinn J, Pang Y, Graeber C, Shaw S, Dong J, et al. Activation of the novel estrogen receptor G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) at the plasma membrane. Endocrinology. 2007;148:3236–3245. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Revankar CM, Mitchell HD, Field AS, Burai R, Corona C, Ramesh C, et al. Synthetic estrogen derivatives demonstrate the functionality of intracellular GPR30. ACS Chem Biol. 2007;2:536–544. doi: 10.1021/cb700072n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Olde B, Leeb-Lundberg LM. GPR30/GPER1: searching for a role in estrogen physiology. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2009;20:409–416. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hazell GG, Yao ST, Roper JA, Prossnitz ER, O'Carroll AM, Lolait SJ. Localisation of GPR30, a novel G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor, suggests multiple functions in rodent brain and peripheral tissues. J Endocrinol. 2009;202:223–236. doi: 10.1677/JOE-09-0066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bopassa JC, Eghbali M, Toro L, Stefani E. A novel estrogen receptor GPER inhibits mitochondria permeability transition pore opening and protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;298:H16–H23. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00588.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Filice E, Recchia AG, Pellegrino D, Angelone T, Maggiolini M, Cerra MC. A new membrane G protein-coupled receptor (GPR30) is involved in the cardiac effects of 17beta-estradiol in the male rat. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;60:3–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Weil BR, Manukyan MC, Herrmann JL, Wang Y, Abarbanell AM, Poynter JA, et al. Signaling via GPR30 protects the myocardium from ischemia/reperfusion injury. Surgery. 2010;148:436–443. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Groban L, Yamaleyeva LM, Westwood BM, Houle TT, Lin M, Kitzman DW, et al. Progressive diastolic dysfunction in the female mRen(2). Lewis rat: influence of salt and ovarian hormones. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63:3–11. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bologa CG, Revankar CM, Young SM, Edwards BS, Arterburn JB, Kiselyov AS, et al. Virtual and biomolecular screening converge on a selective agonist for GPR30. Nat Chem Biol. 2006;2:207–212. doi: 10.1038/nchembio775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jessup JA, Zhang L, Presley TD, Kim-Shapiro DB, Wang H, Chen AF, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin restores diastolic function and attenuates superoxide production in ovariectomized mRen2.Lewis rats. Endocrinology. 2011;152:2428–2436. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-0061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jessup JA, Zhang L, Chen AF, Presley TD, Kim-Shapiro DB, Chappell MC, et al. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibition improves diastolic function and reduces oxidative stress in ovariectomized mRen2.Lewis rats. Menopause. 2011;18:698–708. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31820390a2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chappell MC, Gallagher PE, Averill DB, Ferrario CM, Brosnihan KB. Estrogen or the AT1 antagonist olmesartan reverses the development of profound hypertension in the congenic mRen2. Lewis rat. Hypertension. 2003;42:781–786. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000085210.66399.A3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chappell MC, Westwood BM, Yamaleyeva LM. Differential effects of sex steroids in young and aged female mRen2.Lewis rats: a model of estrogen and salt-sensitive hypertension. Gend Med. 2008;5(Suppl A)):S65–S75. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2008.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lindsey SH, Cohen JA, Brosnihan KB, Gallagher PE, Chappell MC. Chronic treatment with the G protein-coupled receptor 30 agonist G-1 decreases blood pressure in ovariectomized mRen2.Lewis rats. Endocrinology. 2009;150:3753–3758. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-1664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Slama M, Susic D, Varagic J, Frohlich ED. Diastolic dysfunction in hypertension. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2002;17:368–373. doi: 10.1097/00001573-200207000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee KS, Park JH, Lee S, Lim HJ, Park HY. PPARdelta activation inhibits angiotensin II induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by suppressing intracellular Ca2+ signaling pathway. J Cell Biochem. 2009;106:823–834. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Patel VH, Chen J, Ramanjaneya M, Karteris E, Zachariades E, Thomas P, et al. G-protein coupled estrogen receptor 1 expression in rat and human heart: Protective role during ischaemic stress. Int J Mol Med. 2010;26:193–199. doi: 10.3892/ijmm_00000452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shuster LT, Gostout BS, Grossardt BR, Rocca WA. Prophylactic oophorectomy in premenopausal women and long-term health. Menopause Int. 2008;14:111–116. doi: 10.1258/mi.2008.008016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Amin MG, Tighiouart H, Weiner DE, Stark PC, Griffith JL, MacLeod B, et al. Hematocrit and left ventricular mass: the Framingham Heart study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1276–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gaasch WH, Bing OH, Mirsky I. Chamber compliance and myocardial stiffness in left ventricular hypertrophy. Eur Heart J. 1982;3(Suppl A)):139–145. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/3.suppl_a.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Burlew BS, Weber KT. Cardiac fibrosis as a cause of diastolic dysfunction. Herz. 2002;27:92–98. doi: 10.1007/s00059-002-2354-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, Smiseth OA, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:107–133. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Jackson EK, Keller PJ. 17Beta-estradiol, its metabolites, and progesterone inhibit cardiac fibroblast growth. Hypertension. 1998;31:522–528. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.31.1.522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Voloshenyuk TG, Gardner JD. Estrogen improves TIMP-MMP balance and collagen distribution in volume-overloaded hearts of ovariectomized females. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;299:R683–R693. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00162.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kass DA, Bronzwaer JG, Paulus WJ. What mechanisms underlie diastolic dysfunction in heart failure? Circ Res. 2004;94:1533–1542. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000129254.25507.d6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jessup JA, Westwood BM, Chappell MC, Groban L. Dual ACE-inhibition and AT1 receptor antagonism improves ventricular lusitropy without affecting cardiac fibrosis in the congenic mRen2.Lewis rat. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;3:245–257. doi: 10.1177/1753944709338489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kravtsov GM, Kam KW, Liu J, Wu S, Wong TM. Altered Ca(2+) handling by ryanodine receptor and Na(+)-Ca(2+) exchange in the heart from ovariectomized rats: role of protein kinase A. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;292:C1625–C1635. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00368.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ren J, Hintz KK, Roughead ZK, Duan J, Colligan PB, Ren BH, et al. Impact of estrogen replacement on ventricular myocyte contractile function and protein kinase B/Akt activation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284:H1800–H1807. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00866.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chu SH, Goldspink P, Kowalski J, Beck J, Schwertz DW. Effect of estrogen on calcium-handling proteins, beta-adrenergic receptors, and function in rat heart. Life Sci. 2006;79:1257–1267. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Vizgirda VM, Wahler GM, Sondgeroth KL, Ziolo MT, Schwertz DW. Mechanisms of sex differences in rat cardiac myocyte response to beta-adrenergic stimulation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;282:H256–H263. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2002.282.1.H256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Klinge CM. Estrogenic control of mitochondrial function and biogenesis. J Cell Biochem. 2008;105:1342–1351. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cazorla O, Freiburg A, Helmes M, Centner T, McNabb M, Wu Y, et al. Differential expression of cardiac titin isoforms and modulation of cellular stiffness. Circ Res. 2000;86:59–67. doi: 10.1161/01.res.86.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ago T, Kuroda J, Pain J, Fu C, Li H, Sadoshima J. Upregulation of Nox4 by hypertrophic stimuli promotes apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 2010;106:1253–1264. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.213116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kuroda J, Ago T, Matsushima S, Zhai P, Schneider MD, Sadoshima J. NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox4) is a major source of oxidative stress in the failing heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:15565–15570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002178107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mårtensson UE, Salehi SA, Windahl S, Gomez MF, Swärd K, Daszkiewicz-Nilsson J, et al. Deletion of the G protein-coupled receptor 30 impairs glucose tolerance, reduces bone growth, increases blood pressure, and eliminates estradiol-stimulated insulin release in female mice. Endocrinology. 2009;150:687–698. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mayer LP, Pearsall NA, Christian PJ, Devine PJ, Payne CM, McCuskey MK, et al. Long-term effects of ovarian follicular depletion in rats by 4-vinylcyclohexene diepoxide. Reprod Toxicol. 2002;16:775–781. doi: 10.1016/s0890-6238(02)00048-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kolodgie FD, Farb A, Litovsky SH, Narula J, Jeffers LA, Lee SJ, et al. Myocardial protection of contractile function after global ischemia by physiologic estrogen replacement in the ovariectomized rat. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1997;29:2403–2414. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1997.0476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cavasin MA, Sankey SS, Yu AL, Menon S, Yang XP. Estrogen and testosterone have opposing effects on chronic cardiac remodeling and function in mice with myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284:H1560–H1569. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01087.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Modena MG, Muia N, Jr, Aveta P, Molinari R, Rossi R. Effects of transdermal 17beta-estradiol on left ventricular anatomy and performance in hypertensive women. Hypertension. 1999;34:1041–1046. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.34.5.1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321–333. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.3.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Furberg CD, Vittinghoff E, Davidson M, Herrington DM, Simon JA, Wenger NK, et al. Subgroup interactions in the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study: lessons learned. Circulation. 2002;105:917–922. doi: 10.1161/hc0802.104280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Herrington DM. The HERS trial results: paradigms lost? Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:463–466. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-6-199909210-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B, et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 1998;280:605–613. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.7.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Heiss G, Wallace R, Anderson GL, Aragaki A, Beresford SA, Brzyski R, et al. Health risk and benefits 3 years after stopping randomized treatment with estrogen and progestin. JAMA. 2008;299:1036–1045. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.9.1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lacroix AZ, Chlebowski RT, Manson JE, Aragaki AK, Johnson KC, Martin L, et al. Health outcomes after stopping conjugated equine estrogens among postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011;305:1305–1314. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yamaleyeva LM, Pendergrass KD, Pirro NT, Gallagher PE, Groban L, Chappell MC. Ovariectomy is protective against renal injury in the high-salt-fed older mRen2. Lewis rat. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293:H2064–H2071. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00427.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yang CM, Kandaswamy V, Young D, Sen S. Changes in collagen phenotypes during progression and regression of cardiac hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res. 1997;36:236–245. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(97)00186-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pendergrass KD, Pirro NT, Westwood BM, Ferrario CM, Brosnihan KB, Chappell MC. Sex differences in circulating and renal angiotensins of hypertensive mRen(2). Lewis but not normotensive Lewis rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;295:H10–H20. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01277.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Cardiovascular Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES