Abstract
The marine mussel Mytilus edulis and its closely related sister species are distributed world-wide and play an important role in coastal ecology and economy. The diversification in different species and their hybrids, broad ecological distribution, as well as the filter feeding mode of life has made this genus an attractive model to investigate physiological and molecular adaptations and responses to various biotic and abiotic environmental factors. In the present study we investigated the immune system of Mytilus, which may contribute to the ecological plasticity of this species. We generated a large Mytilus transcriptome database from different tissues of immune challenged and stress treated individuals from the Baltic Sea using 454 pyrosequencing. Phylogenetic comparison of orthologous groups of 23 species demonstrated the basal position of lophotrochozoans within protostomes. The investigation of immune related transcripts revealed a complex repertoire of innate recognition receptors and downstream pathway members including transcripts for 27 toll-like receptors and 524 C1q domain containing transcripts. NOD-like receptors on the other hand were absent. We also found evidence for sophisticated TNF, autophagy and apoptosis systems as well as for cytokines. Gill tissue and hemocytes showed highest expression of putative immune related contigs and are promising tissues for further functional studies. Our results partly contrast with findings of a less complex immune repertoire in ecdysozoan and other lophotrochozoan protostomes. We show that bivalves are interesting candidates to investigate the evolution of the immune system from basal metazoans to deuterostomes and protostomes and provide a basis for future molecular work directed to immune system functioning in Mytilus.
Introduction
The marine mussel Mytilus edulis and its closely related sister species M. galloprovincialis, M. trossulus, M. californianus, M. chilensis and M. coruscus are distributed world-wide and play an important role in coastal ecology and economy. The genus' diversification and broad ecological distribution has made these species attractive models to investigate physiological and molecular adaptations to different environmental conditions. Especially the understanding of the immune system has been a focus of research in Mytilus spp., in order to improve aquaculture conditions, but also to understand specific acclimation and adaptation processes to local and changing environmental settings [1], [2]. The immune system of Mytilus has so far been mainly studied on the cellular and protein level [3], [4], but recent investigations on the molecular level already gave indications about the complexity and diversification of the innate immune system [2], [5], [6]. Filter feeding bivalves such as Mytilus spp., are constantly exposed to a complex microbiota from the surrounding seawater medium and thus subject to extensive attack of potential pathogens (e.g. Vibrio species). However, reports of mass mortality are lacking in Mytilus spp. and infections by pathogens are rarely reported [7], which speaks for an effective immune system in this genus. In the present paper we report a large Mytilus edulis transcriptome (2.39mio reads assembled into 74,622 contigs and 176,476 singletons), generated from different tissues of immune challenged and stress treated M. edulis individuals from the Baltic Sea using 454 pyrosequencing. In the subsequent analysis of the M. edulis database the stringently assembled contigs were searched for immune related transcripts with a special focus on the comparison to well-known immune related genes of other invertebrates and vertebrates. The rationale behind this approach is the currently changing understanding of phylogenetic relationships and complexity of cellular pathways in animal phyla, due to the increasing availability of sequences from massive parallel sequencing projects. Sequencing of genomes and transcriptomes of invertebrates like the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus [8], the leech Hirudo medicinalis [9] or Cnidarians [10] as well as basal chordates like Branchiostoma floridae [11] revealed an unexpected diversity of innate immune system pathways and even primitive precursors of an adaptive immune system. Several immune system components which were thought to be restricted to the vertebrate clade were found to already occur in lower invertebrates and were lost again during evolution in the classical invertebrate model organisms C. elegans and D. melanogaster [12], [13], [14]. While genomes and transcriptomes of the ecdysozoan clade, as well as lower invertebrates of the deuterostome clade have been extensively investigated in the past, detailed sequence information of the third bilaterian clade, the lophotrochozoans, is still lacking. However, this clade might be especially useful for the understanding of evolutionary conserved pathways as there is increasing evidence that gene divergence and loss in the lophotrochozoan clade occurred at a lower rate compared to ecdysozoans [12]. Thus this group might reveal interesting insights into the function and evolution of the immune system. In the present study Mytilus edulis was used as a model species for the lophotrochozoan clade to a) investigate the utility of bivalves to understand the evolution of the immune system from basal metazoans to deuterostomes and protostomes and b) to lay a basis for future molecular work directed to immune system functioning in Mytilus spp.
Methods
Sample collection and preparation
Several independent transcriptomal data sets of M. edulis were generated using 454 technology (454 Life Sciences, USA) with FLX and Titanium chemistry. To maximize the diversity of expressed stress- and immune-related transcripts in the experimental material, M. edulis individuals were exposed to different stressors and different tissues were used for RNA extraction. For the first set of transcriptome sequencing, M. edulis individuals were collected in March 2008 in Kiel Fjord (Germany) in front of the Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR). Animals were cleaned from epifauna and kept in a constant temperature room at 10°C with a flow-through of natural unfiltered seawater from Kiel Bay. After 1 week of acclimation, animals were exposed to the different experimental conditions (5 animals each): 5 days high temperature (20°C), anoxia: wrapped in a double layer of parafilm at 10°C and injury: cracking the shell, and 4 hours immune system challenge: injection of 10 µg lipopolysaccharide (kindly provided by Prof. U. Zaehringer, Research Center Borstel, Germany). Control animals were kept at 10°C and a salinity of 17 in flow-through seawater. Two animals of each experiment were dissected and the different tissues frozen in liquid nitrogen. From these experiments, digestive gland, gill, foot and adductor muscle was used for sequence generation. To enhance the number of stress related transcripts, sequencing reads of ongoing immune and stress related studies were included in the database. This included digestive gland tissues of 4 Mytilus edulis individuals in which inflammation was chemically induced by dextran sodium sulfate (2–4%, 5days; TdB Consultancy, Sweden) and 4 control individuals without DSS treatment, mantle tissues of animals acclimated to high (4000 µatm) and low (380 µatm) seawater pCO2 levels (8–12 animals each, 8 week acclimation, samples from Thomsen and Melzner [15]), as well as M. edulis hemocytes pooled from 32 individuals and treated for 4 h in vitro with or without 2.5 µg/ml flagellin (Enzo Life Sciences GmbH, Germany). The different samples were ground in liquid nitrogen and total RNA extracted using the Qiagen RNeasy (Qiagen, Germany) kit in combination with the QiaShredder from Qiagen. mRNA was purified by using the Qiagen Oligotex mRNA purification kit (Qiagen, Germany). In case of pooled samples equal amounts of mRNA were merged and 400–600 ng used for cDNA generation with the SMART cDNA synthesis kit (Clontech Laboratories, USA). Quality control in each extraction step was investigated using gel electrophoresis and a nanodrop spectrophotometer (Peqlab, Germany). cDNA was further checked with a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, USA).
454 sequencing, EST assembly
Samples were prepared for 454 sequencing according to the manufacturers protocol and sequenced on a 454 Genome Sequencer system (Roche Life Sciences, USA) with FLX and Titanium chemistry (see Table S1 for details of sample sets used for the different transcriptome runs). cDNA libraries used for sequencing were not normalized as recent papers show that although normalization reduces the amount of highly expressed genes, such as ribosomal or genes of structural proteins, the number of genes and GO terms is however not necessarily improved by normalization [16], [17]. Moreover after this first investigation about the immune inventory of M. edulis, further investigations will focus on differential expression analysis between tissues and treatments which require non- normalized datasets.
The resulting sequences were extracted from 454 output files using the ‘sffinfo’ script from Roche. Subsequently sequences were again quality controlled (bases with quality 10≤ were removed) and cleaned for primer and adapter sequences (Smart primer sequences and 454 adapters) as well as polyA tails by ‘seqclean’, ‘cln2qual’ (TGI - The Gene Index Project) before the assembly. Reads smaller than 40 bp after the quality control and cleaning were excluded from further sequence assembly and annotation. Details about sequence data input are given in file S1. The trimmed reads of the first data set were assembled with the Celera assembler version 5.3 and subsequently in several rounds with the TGICL (Cap3) assembler. The ‘minimum overlap length’ varied between 40 and 200 bp and the ‘minimum overlap identity’ between 90 and 100%. Additional reads from the CO2 treated mantle tissue and flagellin stimulated hemocytes were assembled with the ‘GS De novo Assembler 2.3’ from Roche (NEWBLER, Roche/454 Life Sciences), as a first step. The standard parameters of the ‘GS De novo Assembler 2.3’ were used for this initial assembly (‘minimum overlap length’ = 40; ‘minimum overlap identity’ = 90). Afterwards the resulting contigs and singletons were further assembled in multiple rounds using the TGICL (Cap3) assembler, using the first transcriptome as a backbone. The ‘minimum overlap length’ varied between 40 and 460 bp and the ‘minimum overlap identity’ between 80 and 98%. At last all reads were mapped against the generated contigs and the Mytilus edulis mitochondrion genome (GI:55977238) using AMOScmp (http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/amos/index.php? title = AMOScmp), which resulted in the final contigs. A detailed list of the assembly process is given in table S2.
Database statistics
For comparison with published Mytilus sequence information, the obtained contigs and singletons were blasted (BLASTN) against already published Mytilus sequences with a cut off e-value of 1e −10, 20, 30, 60 and 100. M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis sequence reads generated by pyrosequencing (454 Roche, USA) by Craft et al. [18] were downloaded from the MG-RAST portal (http://metagenomics.nmpdr.org/; [19]), cleaned and assembled as described above. In total 7088 MG-RAST M. edulis sequences (average length 147 bp) could be assembled into 271 contigs (av. length 245 bp) and 5742 singletons (av. length 138 bp). The 104123 MG-RAST sequences (av. length 211 bp) of M. galloprovincialis were assembled into 12,827 contigs (av. length 279 bp) and 40,972 singletons (av. length 207 bp). Additional 5036 M. edulis and 12827 M. galloprovincialis as well as all sequences belonging to the genus Mytilus (67779 sequences) were downloaded from the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 12/2010), which in case of M. galloprovincialis also includes the sequences obtained by Mytibase (http://mussel.cribi.unipd.it/, [20]). These sequences were not assembled but used as singletons due to their different origin with respect to investigators and sequencing techniques.
Phylogenetic analysis
Orthologous groups of 23 species (Table S3) were computed by bidirectional best hit (BBH) method [21] and manually inspected. To select one-to-one orthologs from the Mytilus edulis EST catalog we used BLAST against the pre-computed groups and additional manual inspection. Missing data were not allowed. 71 gene groups fulfilled this criterion. Alignments were computed using MUSCLE [22] on all identified groups individually. Ambiguously aligned regions were detected and removed with Gblocks [23] (b2 : 16, b3 : 5, b4 : 5, b5 : h). To increase the phylogenetic signal, supermatrices were established by concatenating the processed single gene alignments using an in-house script. The length of the final concatenated alignment is 30784 Amino acid positions (file S1, S2). The phylogenomic dataset was analyzed with PhyloBayes version 2.3 [24] using the CAT-GTR+Γ4 mixture model. Two independent chains were run for 10000 cycles. For construction of the consensus tree between the two chains a burn in of 1000 trees was used. A maximum difference of 0.0032048 and a mean difference of 2.7709e-05 across all observed bipartitions of the compared independent chains was obtained. Species and gene sequence sources: We used peptide sequences of gene predictions from the completed genomes downloaded as indicated in table S3. The unpublished genomes of Capitella teleta, Lottia gigantea and Helobdella robusta were produced by the US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (JGI) http://www.jgi.doe.gov/ in collaboration with the user community. We thank the Acorn Worm Genome Sequencing Consortium for making their data publicly available, and the BCM-HGSC for providing the draft assembly (Skow_1.0) and the JGI for the peptide sequences of the gene predictions. The Schmidtea mediterannea data were produced by the Genome Institute at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and were obtained from ftp://genome.wustl.edu/pub/organism/Invertebrates/Schmidtea_mediterannea/assembly/Schmidtea_mediterranea-3.1/output/. We thank the Broad institute to make Aplysia californica data publicly available.
Annotation of M. edulis sequences
Putative gene names and protein domains were assigned to all assembled sequences and singletons of the M. edulis transcriptome by using the BLASTX algorithm against the UniprotKB/Swissprot database of UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB, http://www.expasy.org/sprot/) with a cut off e-value of e ≤10−3, as well as tBLASTx (e≤10−3) and BLASTn (e≤10−10) against the NCBI nt database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). To identify conserved domains, the assembled contigs were run via InterProScan [25]. Gene Ontology (GO) terms were deduced from the BLAST and InterProScan results and sorted into the immediate subcategories for ‘molecular function’, ‘cellular component’ and ‘biological process’.
Identification of immune related transcripts
Contigs and associated annotations were analyzed in T-ACE [26]. Orthologs of immune genes were searched via key words and protein structure in the established M. edulis transcriptome. Identified transcripts were visually inspected and re-blasted by hand via nr/nt (tBLASTx, NCBI) against Homo sapiens (taxid 9606), Drosophila melanogaster (taxid 7227), Caenorhabditis elegans (taxid 6239), Mus musculus (taxid 10090), Molluscs (taxid 6447), Bivalvia (taxid 6544) and Mytilus (taxid 6548). Protein domains were re-evaluated using SMART [27] and NCBI DART [28], and transmembrane domains specifically analyzed with the TMHMM Server v. 2.0 (www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/). TNF domains were additionally re-checked within Prosite (http://www.expasy.org/prosite/). In case of the high number of contigs identified for large gene families (e.g. TNF, C1q), contigs were loaded into Sequencer 4.5 and manually assessed whether the sequences assembled with min 20 bp overlap and 90% identity or indeed represent separate gene fragments.
Tissue expression of selected contigs with putative immune function
A selected number of putative M. edulis immune gene encoding contigs were investigated in a tissue panel of untreated M. edulis individuals to identify tissues of high immune-competence which could serve as candidate tissues for future functional studies. M. edulis individuals of equal size were sampled in September 2010 and kept in a flow through system at 15°C for 1 week. Expression of selected transcripts (Table 1) was investigated in gill, foot, digestive gland, adductor muscle, inner mantle tissue (central zone), mantle rim (pallial and marginal zone) and hemocytes. Prior to tissue dissection hemolymph of six animals was collected individually with a syringe from the posterior adductor muscle, immediately centrifuged at 400×g, for 10 min at 15°C, and the pellet frozen in liquid nitrogen. Subsequently the six animals were dissected and tissues immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted as described above and quality and quantity determined using a nanodrop spectrophotometer (Peqlab, Erlangen). Equal amounts of total RNA from the six different individuals per tissue were pooled for cDNA generation using the Advantage RT-for PCR Kit (Clontech, Germany). Real-time primer (Table 1) were designed using Primer3 [29] and investigated for primer-dimers and hairpin formation using netprimer (Premier Biosoft). To check primer specificity, a PCR was performed with Advantage Taq 2 polymerase (Clontech, Germany) and the appropriate PCR conditions. The PCR products were evaluated by gel electrophoresis to confirm the presence and size of the transcripts. After extraction and purification from the gel PCR products were Sanger sequenced using Big Dye Terminator (BDT) Chemistry (Applied Biosystems, USA). Resulting sequences were assembled with the respective initial contig using Sequencher version 4.5 (GeneCodes, USA).
Table 1. Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR analysis of tissue specific expression of selected contigs with putative immune function identified by BLAST and domain analysis in Mytilus edulis.
Gene name | M. edulis Accession | 5′-3′forward primer | 5′-3′reverse primer |
Me2-IRF | HE609043 | TGAACGACAGCGAATGAGAC | GCTTGATGGCGAGGATGTTA |
Me3-IRF | HE609044 | GACGCTGATTTGTTTGAACG | ATCCTCCGACATTTCCTCCT |
Me4-IRF | HE609045 | GGAACCTGACCTTGGTGTTG | TGATGGCGTCCTGTATGAAA |
LITAF | HE609047 | GAGCCACCCTCCAAACAG | ACCAACCTCCACCAGCCTAT |
NF-κB p65 | HE609048 | GACTTCATCCCCGCCTTT | ACCCCATCCACATAACCTTG |
Me1- NF-κB p50 | HE609049 | TGATGAAATGAAAGAAGAAGAAAAA | TGGCGGTGTGTAGAGGTAGA |
Me1_IκB | HE609059 | GAGACACACCCTTACACATCG | TCCCACATTTACCATCCTTGA |
Me2_IκB | HE609060 | GCCGCAATAAAACTGAAACC | GGAAAAGACGAGGATGGTGA |
IRAK 4 | HE609065 | CCCGTTTACTTCCGTGTTGT | TTTGTGTTCCCCAGTCTTCA |
Me1-LBP | HE609067 | CGGTTCAGTTTTCAGGGATG | TCTTGCTGTCTGTGATTGGTG |
Myd88 | HE609071 | GCCCTCTCGTCCCAAGTAT | GGGTTCATCCATTCAACACAG |
TRAF6 | HE609075 | CTGCTGTCCCACAATCACAC | AGCCCCACCTTCTACATCCT |
Me2-PGRP | HE609081 | TGGGCAGTCAGTGGATGTAA | TGGGATAAAGTAGGGGCTCA |
Me1_SOCS | HE609098 | AGCATACAAAGACGCAAGGA | TCACACTCACCGAAAATAAGAAG |
Me2-IL 17 | HE609102 | TCCAACACATCCTTTCCAGA | AACACACAATACACACACTCACAATC |
Me3-MIF | HE609105 | CCATTGAGACCTACATTTCCTC | TATGCCGACTTTTGCCATTT |
Mytimycin | HE610032 | TCGTTGTGTTGTCTGTTATGTCC | CGCTTTTGTTTGTTGTTTGTT |
Tissue mRNA expression was investigated using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) with SYBR Green (Power SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix, Applied Biosystems, USA) on a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA). PCR cycling conditions were 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min. Samples were run in triplicates. For each primer a melting curve of the PCR product was also performed to ensure the absence of artifacts. The comparative CT method (delta Ct) for the relative quantification of the respective transcript expression was used as described by Livak and Schmittgen (2001). Expression values of putative immune-related contigs were normalized using the 18S rRNA as reference gene. We tested 18S and 28S rRNA as putative reference genes and normfinder (http://www.mdl.dk/publicationsnormfinder.htm) selected 18S rRNA as most suitable reference gene. Data were transferred to GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., USA) and plotted as histograms of normalized expression of target genes.
Results and Discussion
Transcriptome overview
In order to create a comprehensive transcriptome data set, sequences from different tissues and stress- and immune-challenged M. edulis individuals were generated on a Genome Sequencer FLX system (454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT, USA). A total of 2393441 reads, with an average length of 279 bp, passed the quality control and filtering and entered the assembly pipeline (Figure 1A). From these, 2216965 reads could be assembled into 74622 contigs with an average length of 645 bp (Figure 1B) and an n50 value of 767 bp. 176476 reads could not be assembled and remained as singletons. The GC-Content of the transcriptome was 34.45% and the AT/GC-ratio 1.90. Mean coverage of contigs (number of bases in all reads within the contig/number of bases of the contig consensus sequence) was 11.81x with a minimum of 1.04 and maximum of 17989x. Coverage per base of the whole transcriptome was mean 12.66x and max. 30964x. The transcriptome project is deposited as SRA study ERP00937 and Bioproject 75259 at the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA). Assembled transcriptome sequences are deposited in the ENA as Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly (TSA) and accession numbers are given throughout the text or tables.
Comparison with known Mytilus sequences
To benchmark the generated transcriptome, contigs and singletons were compared with previously published sequences of M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis. Specifically, we obtained M. edulis, M. galloprovincialis sequence data from a recent pyrosequencing project by Craft et al [18] and downloaded M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis sequences from the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, downloaded 12/2010) as well as retrieved all sequences belonging to the Mytilus genus from the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, downloaded 12/2010). The number of contigs and singletons of the current M. edulis database more than doubled the current public sequence information (Figure 2). We compared the new generated M. edulis sequences with previously published sequences on the nucleotide level using BLASTn and cut off e-values of 1e −10 to 1e −100, to investigate whether the new database increased also the amount of new sequence information. Most of the M. edulis (78–90%) and M. galloprovincialis (64–95%) newly assembled contigs from sequences generated by Craft et al. [18], or sequences deduced from NCBI, showed high similarity to the M. edulis sequences of the present study (Figure S1 A, B). Also the comparison with all Mytilus genus sequences (from NCBI) showed a high identification rate of 65%. Singletons from the Craft et al. [18] pyrosequencing project, i.e. sequences which could not be assembled into contigs, were only identified to 30–40% (Figure S1 A, B), which could result from the lower quality of the sequences (personal observation). Of the present M. edulis database, 42392 (57%) of the 74622 contigs and 104819 (60%) of the 176476 singletons did not show any similarity to previously published Mytilus sequences and thus represent new sequence information (Figure S1 D).
Transcriptome annotation
To assign a putative function to the assembled contigs and search for immune related genes, M. edulis contigs and singletons were compared against public databases (UniprotKB/Swissprot, nr/nt NCBI) using BLAST. Over 60% of contigs with sequence sizes >500 bp could be annotated either with BLAST matches, GO terms or proteins domains. Singletons of the same length were only annotated up to 27% (Table 2). A more detailed analysis of the matching BLAST hits showed that most BLAST annotations were derived from H. sapiens or M. musculus sequence records and only a minor percentage were annotated by C. elegans or D. melanogaster derived genes (cut off e-value of e≤10−3; Figure 3 a, b). An even lower amount of sequences were similar to public available annotated sequences of Mytilus or Crassostrea (Figure 3 c). The minor percentage of contigs annotated by Mytilus or Crassostrea genes compared to the classical model organisms H. sapiens, M. musculus, D. melanogaster and C. elegans, most likely results from the fact that a higher number of annotated genes are public available for the classical model organisms. Interestingly there is only a minor overlap (<1%) between transcripts annotated by Mytilus and Crassostrea sequence records and at the same time also annotated by H. sapiens, M. musculus, D. melanogaster and C. elegans. This indicates that in most cases bivalve-specific genes (e.g. antimicrobial peptides) were annotated by public available bivalve sequence records. In contrast a nearly complete overlap was observed between M. edulis transcripts which were highly similar to annotated genes of H. sapiens, M. musculus, D. melanogaster and C. elegans. In total however, >4 times more contigs were annotated by H. sapiens or M. musculus compared to D. melanogaster or C. elegans. In these classical model organisms, the number of coding-genes ranges from 20–25000 in H. sapiens and M. musculus to 13–20000 in D. melanogaster and 20000 in C. elegans [30]. Thus the only slightly lower amount of coding sequences in C. elegans and D. melanogaster compared to the two vertebrates cannot explain the much lower observed annotation rate of M. edulis contigs by the two ecdysozoan invertebrates.
Table 2. Summary of the assembly and annotation results in the Mytilus edulis transcriptome.
all sequences | 100–500 bp | >500 bp | |
total number of contigs | 74622 | 38742 | 35096 |
contigs with BLAST matches | 30276 | 10551 | 19676 |
contigs with assigned GO terms | 16415 | 5183 | 11227 |
contigs with InterProScan matches | 22967 | 7321 | 15640 |
contigs without matches | 41985 | 27152 | 14088 |
% annotated | 44 | 30 | 60 |
Total number of singletons | 176476 | 150843 | 7523 |
singletons with blast matches | 33177 | 30586 | 2030 |
singletons without matches | 143135 | 120109 | 5478 |
% annotated | 19 | 20 | 27 |
Phylogenetic analysis of 71 gene groups and 23 species ranging from Amphimedon to Homo sapiens further demonstrate the basal position of lophotrochozoans to which M. edulis belongs within protostomes (Figure 4). This might explain the significant better recovery of shared genes with deuterostomes, rather than with the ecdysozoans C. elegans and D. melanogaster, which are extremely fast evolving and have suffered from major gene loss [13].
GO- and Protein domain analysis
In a second step, contigs were interrogated for predicted protein domains using InterProScan and sorted into Gene Ontology (GO) terms deduced from the InterProScan annotation. This resulted in an assignment of protein domains to 22967 contigs and functional GO-terms to 16415 contigs (Table 2). As reported in other mollusc transcriptome studies [31], [32] the largest proportion of GO assigned sequences fell into 2–3 broad categories of the general term categories ‘biological process’, ‘cellular component’ and ‘molecular function’ (Figure 5). We were especially interested in immune related sequences but within the GO-category ‘biological process’, only a small amount of transcripts (127 transcripts) fell into the category immune system process. These contigs mainly consisted of predicted toll-like receptor – like transcripts. However, by using protein domain prediction (InterProScan), a high number of predicted immune-related protein domains e.g. 524 C1q domain containing contigs could be identified in the transcriptome (Figure 6). Within the classical complement pathway (see below) C1q acts as the target recognition protein but is also considered to bind directly to pathogens and enhance phagocytosis and was further found to function as a lectin and activate the lectin complement pathway [6], [33]. First expression analysis in Mytilus galloprovincialis, Chlamys farreri and Ruditapes decussatus found C1q-domain containing transcripts to be up-regulated upon stimulation with LPS, different bacteria and parasites and appear to play an important role in host defense [6], [34], [35]. Previous studies identified high numbers of C1q-domain containing genes in vertebrates such as in the human (31 models, [36]) and zebrafish genome (52 models, [37]), and only lower numbers were found in invertebrates like the sea urchin S. purpuratus (4 gene models, [8]) or the urochordate Ciona intestinalis (2 gene models, [38]). This led to the assumption of a higher diversification of this gene family in the vertebrate lineage. Recent investigation of genomes and transcriptomes of molluscs and other invertebrate species however revealed a high number of C1q-containing gene models [39]. Gerdol et al [39] reported at least 168 different C1q domain-containing transcripts in M. galloprovincialis transcriptome and in the present Mytilus edulis transcriptome 524 contigs exhibiting a C1q domain were found. Our finding support the hypothesis of the expansion of this gene family in Mytilus while this seems not to be the general case in other bivalves [39]. Other highly abundant protein domains comprise the TIR, SRCR, Caspase, CARD and DEATH domain, which are found in a large number of receptor and adaptor molecules involved in immunity and apoptosis. Interestingly the NACHT domain, a key element of NOD-like receptors (see below), as well as the PYRIN domain was absent which indicated a possible absence of the NLR pathway.
To identify immune related genes we therefore investigated the Mytilus edulis database in a combined approach by key-word and protein domain search. Contigs identified by key word search within their BLAST annotation were manually verified (i.e. inspected for the expected protein domains for the specific gene) and vice versa: characteristic protein domains and domain combinations were used to identify contigs with putative immune function which were then subsequently verified by their BLAST annotation.
Identification of immune- related transcripts in Mytilus edulis 1. Pathogen sensors: TLRs, NLRs, RLRs, GNBPs and PGRPs
A first focus of the present study was the identification of pathogen sensors in Mytilus edulis, as the first line of defense starts outside the cell, via the recognition of pathogens to prevent an infection. Toll like receptors (TLRs), peptidoglycan recognition receptors (PGRPs) and gram-negative binding proteins (GNBPs) are pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) which recognize bacteria, fungi and viruses on the cellular surface. NOD-like receptors (NLRs) and RIG-like receptors (RLRs) play a major role in the recognition of intra-cellular bacteria and viruses, respectively.
1.1 Toll receptor pathway
The TLR pathway is a highly conserved pathway and TLRs are found throughout the animal kingdom from basal metazoans to vertebrates [40]. TLRs recognize microbial structures via the extracellular leucine-rich-repeat (LRR) domain; signal transduction takes place by the intracellular toll-interleukin-domain (TIR) domain and TIR domain containing adaptor molecules. Previous investigation of bivalve TLRs only identified a single TLR in Mya arenaria, Chlamys farreri and Crassostrea gigas, respectively [41], [42], [43] or 2 transcripts in Mytilus galloprovincialis [7] which led to the assumption of a small TLR repertoire being present in bivalves. The transcriptome investigation of M. edulis, however, conveys a different picture with 27 putative TLR encoding contigs (e-value≤10−10, Table 3, Figure 7). Eight of these contigs show the typical domain structure of TLRs (LRR-TM-TIR), another 8 are comprised of a TIR and transmembrane domain and 11 transcript fragments only show a TIR domain but are highly similar to TLRs of other organisms (Table 3). In the purple sea urchin S. purpuratus, the high diversification of TLRs (222 TLR gene models [8]) was assumed to be a result of the absence of the adaptive immune system and the development of a complex and large body size, benthic lifestyle and long life span [40]. This might also be valid for bivalves and may explain the relatively high number of TLR transcripts found in the present transcriptome. Bivalves like the giant clam Tridacna gigas reach extremely large sizes, several bivalves e.g. the ocean Quahog Arctica islandica are extraordinarily long lived [44] and due to their filter feeding mode of life bivalves are in constant contact to the surrounding microbial community. A high number of bivalves and other molluscs also harbor endosymbiontic bacteria [45], [46] which have to be recognized and controlled for optimal symbiosis. TLR diversification might play a pivotal role in such a control of microbial communities. However, in D. melanogaster not all TLRs are solely involved in the immune response but are also players in developmental processes [40]. The verification of transcript models and the functional analysis of the identified TLRs in Mytilus edulis have to be undertaken as a next step to understand the importance of TLRs in the bivalves' immune system.
Table 3. Toll-like receptor like contigs identified in Mytilus edulis by blast annotation and domain search.
Contig information | Best blast hit (UniprotKB/Swissprot) | |||||||||
M. edulis Accession | Domains identified | Contig length (bp) | Nr. of reads | longest ORF (aa) | Accession | Protein names | Organism | Length | Identity | E-value |
HE609229 | TIR | 533 | 3 | 118 | P08953TOLL | Protein toll | Drosophila melanogaster | 1097 | 37.0% | 4.0×10−18 |
HE609235 | TIR | 505 | 4 | 136 | B2LT62TLR2 | TLR 2 | Capra ibex | 784 | 30.0% | 4.0×10−11 |
HE609240 | TIR | 529 | 4 | 117 | Q6R5N8TLR13 | TLR 13 | Mus musculus | 991 | 34.0% | 2.0×10−15 |
HE609241 | TIR | 285 | 2 | 95 | Q2V897TLR2 | TLR 2 | Boselaphus tragocamelus | 784 | 40.0% | 1.0×10−10 |
HE609217 | TIR | 915 | 15 | 294 | B3Y618TLR2 | TLR 2 | Macaca mulatta | 784 | 40.0% | 5.0×10−14 |
HE609228 | TIR | 488 | 4 | 162 | Q9QUK6TLR4 | TLR 4 | Mus musculus | 835 | 29.0% | 1.0×10−11 |
HE609239 | TIR | 280 | 2 | 79 | Q9QUN7TLR2 | TLR 2 | Mus musculus | 784 | 40.0% | 4.0×10−13 |
HE609230 | TIR | 549 | 3 | 120 | Q9EPW9TLR6 | TLR 6 | Mus musculus | 795 | 42.0% | 8.0×10−13 |
HE609223 | TIR | 854 | 8 | 165 | P08953TOLL | Protein toll | Drosophila melanogaster | 1097 | 27.0% | 7.0×10−10 |
HE609231 | TIR | 787 | 5 | 108 | Q9QUN7TLR2 | TLR 2 | Mus musculus | 784 | 39.0% | 3.0×10−12 |
HE609222 | TIR | 254 | 3 | 77 | Q6T752TLR2_ | TLR 2 | Equus caballus | 784 | 49.0% | 1.0×10−14 |
HE609224 | TM,TIR | 557 | 6 | 172 | Q6R5N8TLR13 | TLR 13 | Mus musculus | 991 | 26.0% | 9.0×10−10 |
HE609234 | TM,TIR | 524 | 3 | 174 | Q9EPW9TLR6 | TLR 6 | Mus musculus | 795 | 28.0% | 9.0×10−16 |
HE609219 | TM,TIR | 645 | 5 | 214 | Q9QUN7TLR2 | TLR 2 | Mus musculus | 784 | 25.0% | 2.0×10−11 |
HE609232 | TM,TIR | 1190 | 11 | 238 | P58727TLR4 | TLR 4 | Felis catus | 833 | 36.0% | 9.0×10−26 |
HE609233 | TM,TIR | 724 | 7 | 154 | Q15399TLR1 | TLR 1 | Homo sapiens | 786 | 36.0% | 6.0×10−24 |
HE609218 | TM,TIR | 1857 | 17 | 553 | Q9DGB6TLR22 | TLR 2 type-2 | Gallus gallus | 781 | 23.0% | 2.0×10−23 |
HE609237 | TM,TIR | 827 | 12 | 237 | Q9DGB6TLR22 | TLR 2 type-2 | Gallus gallus | 781 | 30.0% | 8.0×10−23 |
HE609236 | TM,TIR, | 1149 | 7 | 332 | Q9DD78TLR21 | TLR 2 type-1 | Gallus gallus | 793 | 28.0% | 7.0×10−24 |
HE609238 | 5xLRR, TM, TIR, | 1687 | 20 | 544 | Q6R5N8TLR13 | TLR 13 | Mus musculus | 991 | 26.0% | 1.0×10−31 |
HE609225 | 11xLRR, LRRNT, 4x LRR, TM,TIR | 3744 | 125 | 1138 | P08953TOLL | Protein toll | Drosophila melanogaster | 1097 | 26.0% | 3.0×10−64 |
HE609226 | 2x LRR, LRRCT,TM, TIR | 1260 | 10 | 419 | Q15399TLR1 | TLR 1 | Homo sapiens | 786 | 33.0% | 3.0×10−25 |
HE609216 | 2x LRR,LRRCT,TM,TIR | 1645 | 18 | 540 | Q9QUK6TLR4 | TLR 4 | Mus musculus | 835 | 24.0% | 1.0×10−18 |
HE609227 | LRRCT, TM, TIR | 1000 | 10 | 333 | Q689D1TLR2 | TLR 2 | Canis familiaris | 785 | 28.0% | 4.0×10−29 |
HE609242 | LRRCT,LRRNT,LRRCT,TM,TIR | 2477 | 186 | 479 | P08953TOLL | Protein toll | Drosophila melanogaster | 1097 | 23.0% | 1.0×10−20 |
HE609220 | LRRCT,TM,TIR | 775 | 11 | 225 | Q9EPW9TLR6 | TLR 6 | Mus musculus | 795 | 27.0% | 3.0×10−14 |
HE609221 | LRRCT,TM,TIR | 1023 | 15 | 283 | Q704V6TLR6 | TLR 6 | Bos taurus | 793 | 24.0% | 2.0×10−22 |
Only contigs with showed a TLR blast annotation with e-values≤10−10 and at least a TIR domain are shown.
To investigate the composition of the downstream TLR pathway, we searched for other molecular constituents of the TLR pathway, e.g. key adaptor molecules like the myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88 (MyD88), TIR domain-containing adapter molecule (TIRAP/MAL), TIR domain-containing adapter molecule 2 (TRAM/TICAM2) and the TIR domain-containing adapter molecule 1 (TRIF). The use of the different adaptor molecules differentiate the TLR signaling network in a MYD88 -dependent (MYD88, TIRAP) and -independent (TRAM, TRIF) pathway. In cnidaria main players of the MyD88 -dependent and -independent pathway could be identified such as MYD88, TRIF and TRAM (TICAM2) [10]. However, in the lower deuterostomes and protostomes like S. purpuratus, D. melanogaster and C. elegans, TLR signaling seems to takes place solely via the MyD88 dependent pathway [8], [11]. TIRAP (MAL) is also not present in these species leaving MyD88 as the single primary adaptor molecule for downstream signaling. Most constituents of the MyD88 dependent TLR pathway are found in M. edulis, including MyD88 (#HE609071), IRAK 4 (#HE609065), TRAF6 (#HE609075) and others (Figure 8, Table S4). We did not find clear evidence for the MYD88- independent pathway, i.e. distinct orthologues of TRAM and TRIF, which is in line with other findings in Mytilus galloprovincialis [7] and the so far hypothesized absence of this pathway in lophotrochozoan invertebrates. One weak hit for TRAM (#HE609076) is however present in Mytilus edulis as well as putative transcripts for further components of the Myd88 independent pathway such as TRAF3 (#HE609056), TBK1 (#HE609091) and several interferon regulatory factors (IRF, #HE609042, HE609043, HE609044, HE609045, HE609046). In S. purpuratus and B. floridae a high number of yet uncharacterized TIR-domain containing molecules were hypothesized to functionally replace TIRAP, TRAM or TRIF [8]. This might also be the case for M. edulis where 11 uncharacterized transcripts with TIR domains could be identified. Another TIR domain containing molecule involved in the MyD88 independent TLR pathway in humans, and present in M. edulis, is SARM (Sterile alpha and TIR motif-containing protein, #HE609073). The exact function of SARM is still under debate as a variety of functions (immune system, neuronal development) and interaction partners where found within the deuterostome and protostome lineages [47]. In humans and also in the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus SARM is a negative regulator of TRIF in the Myd88 independent line of the TLR pathway and does not interact with Myd88 [48]. In a recent investigation of the B. floridae SARM ortholog however, a convincing interaction of SARM with Myd88 and TRAF6 within the Myd88 dependent pathway of the TLR pathway was reported. The investigation such an interaction between SARM and MyD88 in M. edulis could thus give a further indication whether the MyD88 independent pathway is present or absent in M. edulis. In C. elegans however, TIR-1, the C. elegans ortholog of SARM, does not at all react with the sole TLR in this species, but utilizes a p38 MAPK-signaling pathway [48]. It remains to be investigated whether a MyD88 independent pathway exists also in protostomian and deuterostomian invertebrates.
1.2 Rig-like receptors (RLRs)
Intracellular sensors of foreign RNA are the retinoic acid inducible gene I (RIG-I) and the melanoma differentiation associated gene-5 (MDA-5) [49]. Signal transduction takes place via the N-terminal CARD domain. RIG-I and MDA-5 like genes have been identified throughout the animal kingdom from cnidaria up to vertebrates and also in the Mytilus edulis transcriptome gene fragments are found (Figure 7, Table S4). The MDA-5 (#HE610043) orthologue in M. edulis is composed of the classical protein domain structure with an N-terminal CARD domain, followed by a DEAD/DEAH box helicase domain and a C-terminal helicase-c domain. The identified RIG-1 fragment so far lacks the N-terminal CARD domain which might however be revealed by full-length sequence investigation. However, in S. purpuratus RIG-I like genes were found to contain either a CARD or a DEAD domain. In D. melanogaster Dicer2 is hypothesized to be the functional equivalent to RLRs and lacks a CARD and Helicase c domain [50]. In contrast dicer related helicases (DHRs) in C. elegans contain at least a helicase c domain. The respective genes of both species align very well with M. edulis putative RIG-I and MDA-5 (Table S4). Thus it remains to be elucidated which effector domain is present in M. edulis RIG-I. Although a number of key components of the RLR pathway were found in the M. edulis transcriptome (Table S4), e.g. ATG12 (#HE609120) and ATG5 (#HE609116), the main adaptor protein IPS-1/MAVS/Cardif/Vista (IMCV) could not be identified. So far IMCV homologues were only found from vertebrates down to the purple sea urchin [8] but are not reported for any of the lower invertebrates or within the protostome lineage. It is important to note that the identified key components of the RLR pathway in Mytilus edulis are also involved in other pathways such as autophagy and not restricted to the RLR pathway. Thus the question remains if the identified RIG-1 and MDA-5 like genes work in the same manner as reported for mammals i.e. initiate interferon production and antiviral immunity, or rather initiates specific, RNAi-mediated antiviral effector mechanisms as found in plants, fungi and invertebrates by producing virus-derived small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) [51].
1.3 NOD-like receptors (NLRs)
While TLRs and RLRs seem to be well conserved throughout the animal kingdom, no NLRs were reported so far for the protostome group such as D. melanogaster and C. elegans or other organisms from the ecdysozoan or lophotrochozoan lineage [52]. However the occurrence of NLRs in cnidarians [14] led to the hypothesis that NLRs were secondarily lost in the protostome lineage. NLRs contain a nucleotide binding NACHT domain in combination with an C-terminal LRR domain and N-terminal effector binding domain (e.g. CARD, PYD, BIR) [53]. Especially in lower deuterostomian invertebrates and vertebrates as well as in early diverging metazoans a high number of NLR genes were found, emphasizing the importance of these receptors in the innate immune system [14]. We speculated that the low number of sequences available for lophotrochozoans could have obscured the identification of NLRs so far and a larger transcriptome analysis might reveal NLRs also in bivalves. However in the present Mytilus edulis transcriptome the search for NLRs and NACHT domains was not successful. Moreover key constituents of the NLR pathway are lacking in M. edulis, such as RIP2 (receptor-interacting protein kinase 2) and ASC (speck-like protein containing a CARD), which, like MyD88 or TRAM in the TLR pathway, act as adaptor molecules for different NLRs [53], as well as Caspase 1, a key molecule activated by inflammasome-forming NLRs [54]. It is interesting to speculate that also in Mytilus and bivalves other intracellular PRRs may have taken over the intracellular recognition of bacterial motifs and other danger signals.
1.4 PGRPs/GNBPs/LBPs
Peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs), glucan binding proteins (GNBPs, formerly named Gram-negative binding proteins [55]) and lipopolysaccharide-β-1,3-glucan binding proteins (LBPS) comprise different families of intra- and extracellular proteins with pleiotropic functions from recognition of PAMPs (pathogen associated molecular patterns), enzymatic cleavage to antimicrobial actions. While PGRPs are conserved from insects to mammals [56] - with the exception of nematodes-, GNBPs are absent in mammals [57] and LBPs in insects, but both can be found in molluscs.
In M. edulis seven different transcript fragments encoding putative peptidoglycan recognition proteins were found which exhibit the conserved PGRP/amidase2 domain (Figure 7, Table S4). Mammals possess only 4 PRGPs which are secreted and are directly bactericidal or have an amidase function to hydrolyze peptidoglycan (PGN). PGN recognition in mammals is mediated extracellular by TLRs and intracellular by NLRs [56]. In insects a high variety of shorter and longer PGRPs as well as transmembrane or secreted transcripts are found, of which some are also bactericidal and have amidase function but, more importantly, can initiate signal transduction via the TOLL or IMD pathway or activate the prophenoloxidase cascade [58]. In Drosophila PGRPs are moreover quite specific and the different PGRPs were found to recognize different forms of peptidoglycan and thereby discriminate between gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Of the seven M. edulis transcripts, one represents the first bivalve PGRP with a transmembrane domain (#HE609080), thus, as found in Drosophila, bivalves seem to possess soluble and membrane bound forms of PGRPs. Further, one contig contained an additional SH3b domain (#HE609081), which are mainly known from bacteria and found only in a few eukaryotes. So far SH3b domains have not been reported in combination with a PGRP/Amidase2 domain (UniprotKB). Sanger sequencing verified the identified transcript of M. edulis and high levels were found in gill tissue of M. edulis compared to other tissues and hemocytes (Figure 9). Numerous PGRP orthologues were reported in other bivalves such as scallops and oysters [59], [60], [61], [62] and gene expression could be stimulated by bacterial infection or peptidoglycan (PGN) challenge, whereas LPS stimulation did not result in a significant up-regulation [59], [60], [62]. It had thus been concluded that PGRPs might indeed be important for the recognition and elimination of pathogens, presumably in particular gram-positive bacteria.
Glucan binding proteins (GNBPs) were studied extensively in arthropods [55], [63] and found to recognize β-1,3-glucans of fungal cell walls, LPS, and in cooperation with PGRPs, gram positive bacteria, but not PGN. In arthropods GNBPs are involved in the prophenoloxidase (PO) system, TLR pathway as well as the modulation of hemocytes functions such as phagocytosis, adhesion and degranulation. Research on GNBP function in bivalves is still scarce. Only two studies were conducted so far in the bivalves Perna viridis and C. gigas [64], [65] in which GNBPs were reported to be involved in the PO system. In M. edulis three different GNBPs with a glyco-hydrolase-16 domain were found (Figure 7, Table S4). As described above for PGRP, one GNBP additionally exhibited a transmembrane domain (#HE609089) which could hint towards membrane bound forms of GNBP. In contrast to insects, molluscs also exhibit lipopolysaccharide and β-1,3-glucan binding proteins (LBPs) [66], [67]. LBPs were studied in crustacean species, which lack PGRPs and activate the PO system via LBP [68]. The Mytilus edulis transcriptome contains 4 LBP transcript fragments with a characteristic BPI (bactericidal permeability-increasing protein/lipopolysaccharide-binding protein/cholesteryl ester transfer protein) 1 and/or 2 domain (#HE609067, HE609068, HE609069, HE609070). Two sequences again were additionally characterized by transmembrane domains (Figure 7, Table S4). As for PGRP one of these transmembrane containing LBP transcripts (#HE609067) was expressed highest in hemocytes (Figure 9).
In mammals extracellular sensing of gram negative bacteria is mediated by LBP, an adaptor for TLR4, whereas intracellular recognition is mainly accomplished by NLRs. D. melanogaster, which lacks LBP and NLRs, extracellular Gram positive and negative bacteria are recognized via PGRPs in cooperation with GNBPs which then activate the Toll or IMD pathway [55], [69], [70], [71], [72]. Intracellular recognition in D. melanogaster takes place via PGRP-Le which can activate apoptosis and act via the IMD and JAK/STAT pathway [73], [74]. In C. elegans the situation might be again completely different as this species lacks PGRPs, NLRs and GNBPs as well as functional TLRs or LBPs [69]. In M. edulis it remains to be investigated which of the LBPs, GNBPs and PGRPs recognize bacteria intra and/or extracellular and whether in M. edulis, as shown for D. melanogaster, PRGPs could functionally replace NLRs and act via the JAK/STAT pathway or the initiation of autophagy.
2. Transcription factors
2.1 NF-κB
Many processes downstream of the PRRs are mediated by the transcription factor NF-κB, which is a key regulator of cellular processes such as cell proliferation, -survival and immunity. Members of the NF-κB family have been identified in protostomes and deuterostomes and also in lower invertebrates like the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis, sweet water polyp Hydra, coral Acropora millepora (Cnidaria) and the demosponge Amphimedon [75]. In molluscs Rel family members were found in several bivalves and one gastropod species, and fragments contained the conserved RHD domain with the characteristic amino acid sequence of the DNA recognition loop and NLS [75], [76], [77], [78]. Tissue expression of the gene is ubiquitous in molluscs as is the case for other Rel genes in most taxa. Also in M. edulis two members of the Rel family with conserved RHD and NLS regions were identified with high similarity to the Rel family members p65 (#HE609048) and p50 (#HE609049, HE609050) (Table S4; Figure S2). Further 2 contigs highly similar to IκB (#HE609059, HE609060) and one similar to IKK (#HE609061) were found in the M. edulis transcriptome. The putative NF-κB and IκB transcripts showed a similar expression pattern in the tissue panel, with highest expression in gill tissue (Figure 9).
2.2 Interferon Regulatory Factor Family
A second conserved family of transcriptions factors that are important for the downstream regulation of the PRR mediated innate immune system signaling is the group of the interferon regulatory factor family (IRFs). IRFs are present from the most basal group of metazoans on and were found in porifera, placozoans, ctenophores and cnidarians. In vertebrates 10 members of the IRF family are known which function as major regulators of host defense [79]. IRF genes have two evolutionary conserved domains, the DNA-binding domain (DBD = IRF, Smart ID:SM00348) and the IRF association domain (IAD = IRF3, Pfam ID: PF10401), both already present in sponges. In cnidarians and bilaterians, IRF genes diversified into the IRF-1 (without IAD domain) and IRF4 (containing the IAD domain) branches. The IRF family expanded several times in distinct groups of bilaterians (molluscs, cephalochordates, tunicates and vertebrates), whereas they were lost or mutated beyond recognition in nematodes and insects. Although the function of the IRF family in vertebrates has been studied in considerable detail, very little is known about the function of invertebrate IRF genes. In molluscs 1–7 IRFs were found in different gastropod, bivalve and squid species [79]. All IRFs show the conserved N-terminal DBD domain and only in genome sequences of Aplysia californica and Lottia gigantea the combination of a DBD and IAP domain could be predicted [79]. In the M. edulis transcriptome 5 IRF members were identified which exhibit the conserved DBD domain and in one contig (Me1-IRF, #HE609042) the IAD domain as well (Table S4).This relatively high number of IRFs compared with previous findings in bivalves corroborates the conclusion of Nehyba et al [79] that the IRF family underwent an expansion in the taxon of molluscs; which was mainly deduced by the authors from the finding of 7 IRFs in the genome sequences of the gastropod Aplysia californica [79].
3. Cytokines, cytokine receptors and the JAK/STAT pathway
Classical sequence comparison using the major mammalian cytokines like interferon or interleukins did not yield a high number of identified cytokines in invertebrates [8], [11]. So far identification of invertebrate cytokine-like molecules like Spätzle in D. melanogaster or the Astakines in crustaceans showed no similarity to vertebrate cytokine structures (for review see, [80]). In the present study, we also could not identify any interferon (IFN) related sequences or IFN-domain containing contigs. However, 3 fragments putative encoding for interleukins were identified by blasting the C. gigas interleukin 17 mRNA sequence (EF190193.1) against the M. edulis transcriptome. Me1-IL-17 (#HE609101) and Me2-IL-17 (#HE609102) exhibit an IL17 protein domain and by tBLASTx analysis (UniProtKB) show similarity to interleukin 17 of C. gigas (for #HE609101: e-value of 1.00E-03, Table S4), Oryzias latipes (for #HE609101: e-value of 8.00E-04, for #HE609102: e-value 1.20E-02), Rattus norvegicus (for #HE609102: e-value 4.90E-01) and H. sapiens (for #HE609101: e-value of 1.6, Table S4). The putative transcript for IL16, Me-IL-16 (#HE609100), showed higher similarity to interleukin 16 of other organisms and exhibits an IL16 typical PDZ domain (Table S4). IL-17 seems to be quite well conserved compared to other cytokines as homologues were identified in the sea urchin genome, C. gigas ESTs (CgIL-17) [81] as well as recently in the B. floridae genome [11]. Tissue expression analysis in the oyster revealed highest expression levels in gill tissue and bacterial injection or immersion lead to an increase in CgIL-17 gene expression levels in the immunocytes [81]. Also in M. edulis the investigation of Me2-IL-17 (#HE609102) showed highest expression in gill tissue (Figure 9). The identification of a mollusc IL-17-receptor orthologue however, is still pending.
Another ancient and conserved cytokine of the immune system is the macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), which is reported from cyanobacteria and sea urchins to humans [8], [82] and was also recently discovered in the group of mollusca [83], [84]. Previously found to be a T-cell cytokine of the adaptive immune system, MIF is emerging as an important mediator of the innate immune system and the conservation of MIF across taxa indicates an important biological function. In M. edulis 5 MIF-like transcripts with characteristic MIF domains were identified (Table S4). The ubiquitous distribution of the investigated Me3-MIF (#HE609105) in the different Mytilus tissues (Figure 9) is in line with the broad and constitutive tissue expression pattern of MIF in humans [82]. The respective study however noted a higher expression in tissues directly exposed to the natural environment such as the lung, the epithelial lining of the skin, and the gastrointestinal tracts [82]. In the so far conducted two mollusc studies high expression was also found especially in the hepatopancreas ( = digestive gland), mantle and gill tissue [83], [84] which are tissues highly exposed to the surrounding environment. Stimulation by different microbial associated molecular patterns (MAMPs, e.g. LPS, PGN) or bacteria resulted in increased MIF expression in Chlamys farreri [84] and Haliotis diversicolor [83] indicating the involvement of MIF in innate immune system pathways also in lower invertebrates.
3.1 Tumor necrosis factor superfamily
TNF-α is a soluble cytokine with pleiotropic action. It is a member of the tumor necrosis factor super family (TNF) and their receptors (TNFR), which form a large group in the vertebrate system within various immune system pathways [85]. In bivalves several studies described the response of hemocytes on vertebrate TNF-α and hypothesized the occurrence of this cytokine and related receptors. However, sequence data for invertebrates are still scarce and incomplete. A first TNF-α homologue was identified in the gastropod Haliotis discus discus [86] but further factors and receptors still awaiting discovery in the mollusca. The M. edulis transcriptome does not contain a TNF-α orthologue, however 12 TNF superfamily members were found according to their conserved TNF_2 protein domain (domain ID: PS50049) using PROSITE [87] (Table S5). Eight members contain additional transmembrane domains, and 9 contain TNF-receptor domains, of which 3 have an additional transmembrane and DEATH domain (Table S5). Further the M. edulis transcriptome holds sequences encoding for TNF receptor adaptor proteins such as the DEATH domain containing FADD (#HE609077) and five TRAF proteins (#HE609055, HE609056, HE609057, HE609058, HE609075) (Table S4). No ortholog for TRADD was identified which is in line with reports from other invertebrate studies [88]. In invertebrates like D. melanogaster or the sea urchin S. purpuratus few TNF and TNFR could be identified whereas in B. floridae comparable high numbers like in vertebrates were reported [11] which lead to the hypothesis of the TNF expansion being a chordate innovation [89]. However, the M edulis transcriptome with a high number of TNF related contigs (Table S5) and corresponding adapters (Table S4) suggests that this family already plays an important role in lophotrochozoan species.
The LPS-induced TNF-alpha factor LITAF is a transcription factor which controls TNF alpha gene expression. The gene was indentified in various vertebrates and invertebrates, including bivalves [90], [91], [92]. In bivalves, a single LITAF gene per bivalve species was reported for the scallop Chlamys farreri [90] and the oysters Pinctada fucata [91] and C. gigas [92]. Tissue gene expression pattern in the different species was found to be quite variable with generally highest expression in gill and intestinal organs. LITAF expression in vertebrates and bivalves can be induced by LPS stimulation [91], [93], [94], indicating an immune system function. In the M. edulis transcriptome 24 fragments with a LITAF domain and tBLASTx hit (UniprotKB/Swissprot, e≤10−3) for LITAF were found (Table S6). Tissue expression deduced from the transcriptome data showed high expression in digestive gland and hemocytes. As no specific gill tissue transcriptome was generated qRT-PCR analysis of one LITAF transcript (#HE609047) was carried out. This verified a high expression level in digestive gland tissue and hemocytes and additionally demonstrated high expression in gill tissue (Figure 9). All three tissues are in close contact to the surrounding environment and the gill and digestive gland have to defend their large surfaces against microbial infection with fast recognition and signal transduction. These results, together with the high number of TNF and TNFR transcripts indicate that the TNF pathway presumably plays an important role in the first line of defense in M. edulis.
3.2 JAK/STAT
An evolutionary conserved pathway induced by cytokines is the JAK/STAT pathway. JAKs are activated by cytokine receptors and phosphorylate STATs, which then translocate into the nucleus and modulate expression of various genes involved in immune reactions, such as cytokines. Previous studies in Mytilus edulis using mammalian STAT antibodies and IFN as a stimulant already suggested the occurrence of the JAK/STAT pathway in bivalves. In lower invertebrates like D. melanogaster and Anopheles gambiae, key players of the JAK/STAT pathway have already been identified and were found to be involved in immune response processes [95]. As expected, contigs with a high similarity to JAK 2 (#HE609094) and STAT (#HE609095, HE609096, HE609097) (Table S4) are present in M. edulis. Further 2 putative transcripts of the suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) are found (#HE609098, HE609099), which is a negative regulator of the cytokine signal within the JAK/STAT pathway. The control of cytokine production and other immune responses is crucial to prevent excess inflammatory processes which can also be harmful for the host. SOCS acts in a feedback-loop in such a way that its expression is up-regulated after STAT activation. The investigation of SOCS (#HE609098) in the tissue panel demonstrated highest expression in gill tissue (Table S4). Similar results were found for the single so far described mollusc SOCS gene in the gastropod Haliotis discus discus [96]. These results give evidence for the presence of cytokine-like proteins in M. edulis and other molluscs, and gill tissue might be a good candidate tissue to look for further transcripts. Indeed, as reported above, Me2-IL-17 was expressed highest in gill tissue. Yet no convincing transcript coding for an interleukin- or interferon-receptor could be identified in the M. edulis transcriptome or other studies. Thus, the respective cytokine receptor for the activation of JAK in M. edulis and other bivalves still remains to be discovered.
3.3 Antimicrobial peptides
Like cytokines, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are downstream targets after recognition of foreign particles. AMPs are widely expressed in invertebrates to vertebrates to defend against bacteria and fungi, either by directly killing or slowing growth of the attackers. In vertebrates, and presumably also in invertebrates, they further act as modulators of the immune system by e.g. stimulating cytokine release or chemotaxis [97]. In molluscs, the occurrence and function of AMPs has been especially well studied in M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis. The so far identified AMPs can be sorted into the four groups: defensins, mytilins, myticins and mytimycins [98], [99]. The different peptide groups show distinct antimicrobial properties against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and fungi. Several transcripts of the known AMPs i.e. myticins (5 contigs), mytilins (13 contigs), mytimycins (7 contigs) and defensins (8 contigs) are found in the M. edulis transcriptome (Table S7). Additionally 5 transcripts of a just recently identified AMP for Mytilus galloprovincialis [7], a big defensin, are present (Table S7, Figure S3). All AMP contigs in M. edulis are covered by a high total number of 41274 reads (Table S7). Compared to the much lower number of 13276 reads in all other immune related transcripts (Table S4), this strongly indicates the important role of these AMPs in the Mytilus immune system.
4. Complement system
An ancient pro-inflammatory and microbial destruction system is the complement system. Genomes of Drosophila and Caenorhabditis lack components of the complement system, which previously led to the assumption that the complement pathway is restricted to the vertebrate system. However the recent findings of complement factors in genomes and transcriptomes of other protostomes and early metazoans rather indicates a gene loss in the ecdysozoan lineage and instead imply an ancient origin of the complement pathway [100].
DNA and mRNA sequence findings of the C3 complement factor, which is the central element of all three known complement pathways (classical, alternative, lectin) [100], have been reported for several invertebrates like cnidarians [10], [101], the protostomian horseshoe crab [102] as well as the deuterostomian echinoderms [103], [104] and tunicates [38]. Previous identification of mollusc C3 orthologs in the cephalopod Euprymna scolopes [105] and bivalve Venerupis decussates [106] indicated the possibility of a complement system also in molluscs. In the M. edulis transcriptome, two fragments (#HE609863, HE609109) with high similarity to the C3 complement factor could be identified (Table S4). While the immune system function of C3 was impressively demonstrated in the higher invertebrates [102], [103], however, functional analysis in molluscs is still scarce and awaits further investigation. As further outlined by Nanoko [100] the composition of the complement system in molluscs is still unresolved. In the M. edulis and other mollusc databases, none of the other central components of the mammalian complement cascade (Bf, C2, C4, C5) could be identified next to C3. Only for the factor B (Bf), a component of the alternative pathway, a single transcript is described for the bivalve Ruditapes decussatus [106]. Due to alterations in the sequence structure, the function of the bivalves' Bf gene as a C3 convertase in the complement pathway was, however, questioned by other researchers [100]. In the large M. edulis transcriptome no Bf-like ortholog could be found by annotation or via protein domain analysis.
From the components of the last membrane attack complex (MAC) only a sole fragment with similarity to the C6 complement factor is present in M. edulis (#HE609110). C6, C7, C8 and C9 form the membrane attack complex (MAC) by constructing a pore in the pathogenic/foreign cell membrane, thereby destroying it. Sequence findings of the C6 complement factor and other MAC factors have been described only in the deuterostome lineage, including first hints in marine invertebrates, the sea urchin S. purpuratus [107] and the tunicate Ciona intestinalis [38]. The lack of MAC members in M. edulis goes hand in hand with other transcriptome/genome studies of lower marine invertebrates [10], [105]. The transcriptome, however, contained 19 fragments exhibiting a single Membrane-Attack-Complex/Perforin domain (MACPF, Pfam domain PF01823) which might belong to the complement system (Table S8) [108]. In all, the current data corroborate Nonaka's hypothesis that the complement system of protostomes might be quite different when compared to the vertebrate or cnidarian system [100].
5. Apoptosis/Autophagy
Cell death is a fundamental response to immune stress and different forms of cellular destruction can be distinguished: apoptosis, autophagy and necrosis. The processes of apoptosis and autophagy are well controlled and extensively described pathways [109], [110]. Characteristics of apoptosis on the cellular level, like the fragmentation of the nucleus or translocation of phosphatidylserine to the outer membrane, have been described in a variety of lower invertebrates including molluscs. Sequence information of genes involved in these processes is, however, still rather scarce [111]. In 2006 a complex apoptotic toolkit was discovered in the sea urchin genome, resembling the expanded apoptosis machinery in the vertebrate lineage. This corroborated the hypothesis that the apoptotic pathway increased in complexity towards the deuterostome lineage, whereas it simplified in the protostome group, as described in D. melanogaster and C. elegans. In the present study, however, the finding of various transcripts for apoptosis related genes in the M. edulis transcriptome (Table S4) illustrates once more that the simplification of pathways may not be the case for all protostome lineages. As described above, a high number of TNF receptor like transcripts were identified, which are involved in apoptotic processes, as well as various members of the BCL2 family and the apoptosis-inducing factor family (AIFs, AIF: #HE609124, AFL: #HE609125). Further, the M. edulis transcriptome contains 52 caspase-like transcripts with a caspase domain (Peptidase C14, Pfam domain PF00656). 5 of these transcripts have an additional CARD domain and one an additional BIR domain (Table S9). Such domain organization hints towards the occurrence of initiator and effector caspases in M. edulis and underlines the impression that a complex apoptosis machinery is already present in this mollusc.
In contrast to apoptosis, autophagy does not necessarily lead to cell death but is rather characterized by the formation of double-membrane vesicles which enclose unwanted particles and organelles, so called autophagosomes, which fuse with lysosomes for enzymatic degradation of enclosed contents. Main players here include mTOR (target of rapamycin) which is a key inhibitor of autophagy, and the large group of autophagy-related genes (ATGs), responsible for autophagy induction and autophagosome formation. Recent studies promote the importance of autophagy in the immune system, be it as a downstream effect of TLR recognition or other PRRs [112], [113], or in the involvement of LC3 (ATG8) in phagocytosis of pathogens [114]. In marine invertebrates autophagic processes have mainly been investigated within the context of ecotoxicology or in oxidative stress scenarios induced by various environmental stressors [115]. The involvement in immune system function is less explored and the lack of sequence information hampered the investigation of gene expression until now. Within the current transcriptome we could now identify transcripts for 10 ATGs, Beclin 1 and mTOR (Table S4). These findings point towards a well developed autophagy machinery. The sequence information obtained in the present study will help to investigate this presumably evolutionary early immune pathway, postulated to represent a very initial cell-autonomous defense of early eukaryotic cells against microbes [112].
The de novo transcriptome assembly always results in fragmented transcripts of genes. Previous investigations of immune system parameters in marine invertebrate imply a high diversity within some genes families e.g. C1q domain containing genes in bivalves [6] or TLRs, NLRs or the 185/333 system in sea urchins [116].The high number of transcript fragments reported for some genes families in the present study, such as C1q or TNF domain containing contigs, LITAF-like or BCL2-like contigs, most likely thus represent real single genes, but may still partly result from assembly artifacts or represent splice variants of the same gene. Future studies, which go into more detail of the different genes families, should aim for a further verification of a transcripts' origin. Clustering approaches and multiple sequence alignments could serve as useful tools to test whether contigs indeed represent real single genes. The release of the recently sequenced first bivalve genome from the oyster Crassotrea gigas will certainly give further insight into the diversity of the bivalves' immune system.
Tissue atlas of selected immune repertoire transcripts in Mytilus edulis
Tissue expression of selected contigs with putative immune function in Mytilus edulis was analyzed to get a first insight whether molecular patterns of these contigs i) reflect a tissue or cell specific function e.g. immune defense for hemocytes, or digestion and therefore exposure to microbial loads in the digestive gland, or ii) display the grade of exposure to the surrounding environment e.g. the constant exposure of gill tissue to inflowing seawater and accompanied microbes. 15 of the 17 selected putative immune related transcripts identified the gill tissue and hemocytes as major sites of immune defense (Figure 9). Gills are in close contact to the surrounding sea water medium and the present results imply that this organ might not only be important for feeding and respiration. Moreover, it does not mediate its immune defense purely by physical factors such as a pronounced mucus layer, but may play a major role in the first recognition of unwanted particles in the environment and the initiation of an immune response The high expression of transcripts known to be involved in several immune pathways such as IκB, NF-κB and TRAF 6 as well as interleukin-17 corroborate this assumption. Highest transcript levels of LBP and PGRPs were demonstrated in hemocytes. Both genes are important in the recognition and direct destruction of bacteria. Interestingly, compared to hemocytes and gill tissue, the digestive gland was not characterized by exclusively high expression values of any of the investigated contigs, which was expected due to the high exposure to microbes and other foreign particles during feeding. The current analysis may thus give a first hint towards the differential immunological importance of the barrier organs of M. edulis and may stimulate functional investigations describing the role of different immune pathways under physiological and pathological (e.g. infection) conditions.
Conclusion
The marine mussel Mytilus edulis has a wide geographic and ecosystem distribution and is a keystone species of many coastal marine communities. The in-depth investigation of a M. edulis transcriptome revealed a complex immune repertoire including a high number of innate immune recognition receptors and downstream pathway members, a sophisticated TNF, autophagy and apoptosis system, as well as putative cytokines such as interleukin-17 and several macrophage inhibitory factors (MIFs). The results of this study partly contrast with findings obtained for ecdysozoans and other studies in lophotrochozoans which reported a less complex immune repertoire. Especially the number of 27 TLR exceeds the previous finding of maximal 2 TLR transcripts per bivalve species. Together with the high number of TLR pathway members this indicates a well-conserved TLR pathway in bivalves. A higher number of genes were annotated by species of the deuterostome clade compared to ecdysozoan protostome annotations. Although the absence of NLRs in Mytilus is in line with findings obtained for ecdysozoans, together with the high number of TNF family members, a seemingly complex apoptosis machinery and the presence of LBP and the complement system, this points towards a closer relation to the deuterostome clade due to the basal position of lophotrochozoans within protostomes. This hypothesis is corroborated by the phylogenetic comparison of M. edulis randomly selected genes with 23 species ranging from Amphimedon to Homo sapiens. Mytilus edulis and the other investigated lophotrochozoans (Aplysia californica, Lottia gigantea, Helobdella robusta, Capitella teleta) show a closer evolutionary distance to the deuterostomes than the ecdysozoan clade. Taken together, our study provides an unprecedented in-depth analysis of the Mytilus edulis transcriptome and demonstrates that bivalves indeed represent important model organisms that may lead to novel insights into the phylogeny of the immune system. The inventory of the Mytilus immune system put forward in the current study will form a sound basis for functional studies, which are required to assess the exact role of the individual elements of the transcriptome. In addition to functional studies the data enable to study SNP patterns and allele frequencies in different Mytilus populations subjected to high selective pressure in order to systematically elucidate the extent of selection on distinct immune pathways [117].
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the cellbiology group, sequencing and expression platform of the IKMB for technical support, especially Markus Schilhabel, Robert Haesler, Tanja Kaacksteen, Melanie Friskovec, Anita Dietsch and Dorina Oelsner as well as Flavio Sacco.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This research was supported by the German Research Foundation cluster of Excellence “The Future Ocean” and “Inflammation at Interfaces”. AP and ST were supported by the Max-Planck Gesellschaft zur Foerderung der Wissenschaft”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Romero A, Dios S, Poisa-Beiro L, Costa MM, Posada D, et al. Individual sequence variability and functional activities of fibrinogen-related proteins (FREPs) in the Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) suggest ancient and complex immune recognition models in invertebrates. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2011;35:334–344. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Costa MM, Dios S, Alonso-Gutierrez J, Romero A, Novoa B, et al. Evidence of high individual diversity on myticin C in mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis). Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2009;33:162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2008.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Canesi L, Betti M, Ciacci C, Lorusso LC, Pruzzo C, et al. Cell signalling in the immune response of mussel hemocytes. Invertebrate Survival Journal. 2006;3:40–49. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Canesi L, Gallo G, Gavioli M, Pruzzo C. Bacteria–hemocyte Interactions and Phagocytosis in Marine Bivalves. Microscopy research and technique. 2002;57:469–476. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pallavicini A, del Mar Costa M, Gestal C, Dreos R, Figueras A, et al. High sequence variability of myticin transcripts in hemocytes of immune-stimulated mussels suggests ancient host-pathogen interactions. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2008;32:213–226. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2007.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gestal C, Pallavicini A, Venier P, Novoa B, Figueras A. MgC1q, a novel C1q-domain-containing protein involved in the immune response of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2010;34:926–934. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Venier P, Varotto L, Rosani U, Millino C, Celegato B, et al. Insights into the innate immunity of the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. BMC genomics. 2011;12:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hibino T, Loza-Coll M, Messier C, Majeske AJ, Cohen AH, et al. The immune gene repertoire encoded in the purple sea urchin genome. Dev Biol. 2006;300:349–365. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Macagno E, Gaasterland T, Edsall L, Bafna V, Soares M, et al. Construction of a medicinal leech transcriptome database and its application to the identification of leech homologs of neural and innate immune genes. BMC genomics. 2010;11:407. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Miller D, Hemmrich G, Ball E, Hayward D, Khalturin K, et al. The innate immune repertoire in Cnidaria - ancestral complexity and stochastic gene loss. Genome Biology. 2007;8:R59. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-4-r59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang S, Yuan S, Guo L, Yu Y, Li J, et al. Genomic analysis of the immune gene repertoire of amphioxus reveals extraordinary innate complexity and diversity. Genome Research. 2008;18:1112–1126. doi: 10.1101/gr.069674.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kortschak RD, Samuel G, Saint R, Miller DJ. EST Analysis of the Cnidarian Acropora millepora Reveals Extensive Gene Loss and Rapid Sequence Divergence in the Model Invertebrates. Current Biology. 2003;13:2190–2195. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Raible F, Arendt D. Metazoan Evolution: Some Animals Are More Equal than Others. Current Biology. 2004;14:R106–R108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lange C, Hemmrich G, Klostermeier UC, López-Quintero JA, Miller DJ, et al. Defining the origins of the NOD-like receptor system at the base of animal evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2010;28:1687–1702. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thomsen J, Melzner F. Moderate seawater acidification does not elicit long-term metabolic depression in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology. 2010;157:2667–2676. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hale CM, McCormick CR, Jackson JR, DeWoody A. Next-generation pyrosequencing of gonad transcriptomes in the polyploid lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens): the relative merits of normalization and rarefaction in gene discovery. BMC Genomics. 2009 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ewen-Campen B, Shaner N, Panfilio K, Suzuki Y, Roth S, et al. The maternal and early embryonic transcriptome of the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus. BMC genomics. 2011;12:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Craft JA, Gilbert JA, Temperton B, Dempsey KE, Ashelford K, et al. Pyrosequencing of Mytilus galloprovincialis cDNAs: Tissue-Specific Expression Patterns. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e8875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Meyer F, Paarmann D, D'Souza M, Olson R, Glass E, et al. The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:386. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Venier P, Pallavicini A, De Nardi B, Lanfranchi G. Towards a catalogue of genes transcribed in multiple tissues of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Gene. 2003;314:29–40. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(03)00708-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Overbeek R, Fonstein M, D'Souza M, Pusch GD, Maltsev N. The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999;96:2896–2901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Castresana J. Selection of Conserved Blocks from Multiple Alignments for Their Use in Phylogenetic Analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2000;17:540–552. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lartillot N, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2007;7:S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, et al. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37:D211–D215. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Philipp EER, Kraemer L, Mountfort D, Schilhabel M, Schreiber S, et al. The Transcriptome Analysis and Comparison Explorer – T-ACE: a platform-independent, graphical tool to process large RNAseq data sets of non-model organisms. Bioinformatics. under revision doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Letunic I, Copley RR, Schmidt S, Ciccarelli FD, Doerks T, et al. SMART 4.0: towards genomic data integration. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:D142–D144. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Geer LY, Domrachev M, Lipman DJ, Bryant SH. CDART: Protein Homology by Domain Architecture. Genome Research. 2002;12:1619–1623. doi: 10.1101/gr.278202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S, editors. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2000. pp. 365–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hillier LW, Coulson A, Murray JI, Bao Z, Sulston JE, et al. Genomics in C. elegans: So many genes, such a little worm. Genome Research. 2005;15:1651–1660. doi: 10.1101/gr.3729105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bettencourt R, Pinheiro M, Egas C, Gomes P, Afonso M, et al. High-throughput sequencing and analysis of the gill tissue transcriptome from the deep-sea hydrothermal vent mussel Bathymodiolus azoricus. BMC genomics. 2010;11:559. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Joubert C, Piquemal D, Marie B, Manchon L, Pierrat F, et al. Transcriptome and proteome analysis of Pinctada margaritifera calcifying mantle and shell: focus on biomineralization. BMC genomics. 2010;11:613. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Carland TM, Gerwick L. The C1q domain containing proteins: Where do they come from and what do they do? Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2010;34:785–790. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Prado-Alvarez M, Gestal C, Novoa B, Figueras A. Differentially expressed genes of the carpet shell clam Ruditapes decussatus against Perkinsus olseni. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2009;26:72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang Q, Zmasek C, Dishaw L, Mueller MG, Ye Y, et al. Novel genes dramatically alter regulatory network topology in amphioxus. Genome Biology. 2008;9:R123. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-8-r123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tom Tang Y, Hu T, Arterburn M, Boyle B, Bright JM, et al. The complete complement of C1q-domain-containing proteins in Homo sapiens. Genomics. 2005;86:100–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mei J, Gui J. Bioinformatic identification of genes encoding C1q-domain-containing proteins in zebrafish. Journal of Genetics and Genomics. 2008;35:17–24. doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60003-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Azumi K, Santis R, Tomaso A, Rigoutsos I, Yoshizaki F, et al. Genomic analysis of immunity in a Urochordate and the emergence of the vertebrate immune system: “waiting for Godot”. Immunogenetics. 2003;55:570–581. doi: 10.1007/s00251-003-0606-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gerdol M, Manfrin C, De Moro G, Figueras A, Novoa B, et al. The C1q domain containing proteins of the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis: A widespread and diverse family of immune-related molecules. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2011;35:635–643. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2011.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Leulier F, Lemaitre B. Toll-like receptors - taking an evolutionary approach. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:165–178. doi: 10.1038/nrg2303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Qiu L, Song L, Xu W, Ni D, Yu Y. Molecular cloning and expression of a Toll receptor gene homologue from Zhikong Scallop, Chlamys farreri. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2007;22:451–466. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2006.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mateo DR, Greenwood SJ, Araya MT, Berthe FCJ, Johnson GR, et al. Differential gene expression of [gamma]-actin, Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR-2) and interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK-4) in Mya arenaria haemocytes induced by in vivo infections with two Vibrio splendidus strains. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2010;34:710–714. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang L, Li L, Zhang G. A Crassostrea gigas Toll-like receptor and comparative analysis of TLR pathway in invertebrates. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2011;30:653–660. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2010.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wanamaker AD, Heinemeier J, Scourse JD, Richardson CA, Butler PG, et al. Very long-lived mollusks confirm 17th century AD tephra-based radiocarbon reservoir ages for north Icelandic shelf waters. Radiocarbon. 2008;50:399–412. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dubilier N, Bergin C, Lott C. Symbiotic diversity in marine animals: the art of harnessing chemosynthesis. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2008;6:725–740. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.McFall-Ngai MJ. Consequences of evolving with bacterial symbionts: Insights from the Squid-Vibrio Associations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1999;30:235–256. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yuan S, Wu K, Yang M, Xu L, Huang L, et al. Amphioxus SARM Involved in Neural Development May Function as a Suppressor of TLR Signaling. J Immunol. 2010;184:6874–6881. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Belinda LW-C, Wei WX, Hanh BTH, Lei LX, Bow H, et al. SARM: a novel Toll-like receptor adaptor, is functionally conserved from arthropod to human. Molecular Immunology. 2008;45:1732–1742. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cao X. New DNA-sensing pathway feeds RIG-I with RNA. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:1049–1051. doi: 10.1038/ni1009-1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Takeuchi O, Akira S. RIG-I-like antiviral protein in flies. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:1327–1328. doi: 10.1038/ni1208-1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lu R, Yigit E, Wan-Xiang L, Shou-Wei D. An RIG-I-Like RNA Helicase Mediates Antiviral RNAi Downstream of Viral siRNA Biogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000286. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rosenstiel P, Philipp EER, Schreiber S, Bosch TCG. Evolution and Function of Innate Immune Receptors - Insights from Marine Invertebrates. Journal of Innate Immunity. 2009;1:291–300. doi: 10.1159/000211193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rosenstiel P, Jacobs G, Till A, Schreiber S. NOD-like receptors: Ancient sentinels of the innate immune system. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2008;65:1361–1377. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-7502-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bortoluci K, Medzhitov R. Control of infection by pyroptosis and autophagy: role of TLR and NLR. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2010;67:1643–1651. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0335-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hetru C, Hoffmann JA. NF-kB in the Immune Response of Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000232. doi: 101101/cshperspecta000232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Royet J, Dziarski R. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins: pleiotropic sensors and effectors of antimicrobial defences. Nat Rev Micro. 2007;5:264–277. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mushegian A, Medzhitov R. Evolutionary perspective on innate immune recognition. Journal of Cell Biology. 2001;155:705–710. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200107040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dziarski R. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs). Molecular Immunology. 2004;40:877–886. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2003.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ni D, Song L, Wu L, Chang Y, Yu Y, et al. Molecular cloning and mRNA expression of peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP) gene in bay scallop (Argopecten irradians, Lamarck 1819). Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2007;31:548–558. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2006.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Itoh N, Takahashi KG. A novel peptidoglycan recognition protein containing a goose-type lysozyme domain from the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Molecular Immunology. 2009;46:1768–1774. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Itoh N, Takahashi KG. Distribution of multiple peptidoglycan recognition proteins in the tissues of Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2008;150:409–417. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2008.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Su J, Ni D, Song L, Zhao J, Qiu L. Molecular cloning and characterization of a short type peptidoglycan recognition protein (CfPGRP-S1) cDNA from Zhikong scallop Chlamys farreri. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2007;23:646–656. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2007.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zheng L-P, Hou L, Chang AK, Yu M, Ma J, et al. Expression pattern of a Gram-negative bacteria-binding protein in early embryonic development of Artemia sinica and after bacterial challenge. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2011;35:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jayaraj SS, Thiagarajan R, Arumugam M, Mullainadhan P. Isolation, purification and characterization of [beta]-1,3-glucan binding protein from the plasma of marine mussel Perna viridis. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2008;24:715–725. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2007.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Itoh N, Kamitaka R, Takahashi KG, Osada M. Identification and characterization of multiple [beta]-glucan binding proteins in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2010;34:445–454. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2009.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Su J, Song L, Xu W, Wu L, Li H, et al. cDNA cloning and mRNA expression of the lipopolysaccharide- and beta-1,3-glucan-binding protein gene from scallop Chlamys farreri. Aquaculture. 2004;239:69–80. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Huan P, Zhang X, Li F, Zhang Y, Zhao C, et al. Chromosomal localization and molecular marker development of the lipopolysaccharide and beta-1,3-glucan binding protein gene in the Zhikong scallop Chlamys farreri (Jones et Preston) (Pectinoida, Pectinidae). Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2010;33:36–43. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Liu H, Wu C, Matsuda Y, Kawabata S-i, Lee BL, et al. Peptidoglycan activation of the proPO-system without a peptidoglycan receptor protein (PGRP)? Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2011;35:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Irazoqui JR, Urbach JM, Ausubel FM. Evolution of host innate defence: insights from Caenorhabditis elegans and primitive invertebrates. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2010;10:47–58. doi: 10.1038/nri2689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lemaitre B, Hoffmann JA. The Host Defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Immunology. 2007;25:697–743. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kufer TA, Fritz JH, Philpott DJ. NACHT-LRR proteins (NLRs) in bacterial infection and immunity. Trends in Microbiology. 2005;13:381–388. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Stuart LM, Ezekowitz RA. Phagocytosis and comparative innate immunity: learning on the fly. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:131–141. doi: 10.1038/nri2240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kurata S. Extracellular and intracellular pathogen recognition by Drosophila PGRP-LE and PGRP-LC. International Immunology. 2010;22:143–148. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxp128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Goto A, Yano T, Terashima J, Iwashita S, Oshima Y, et al. Cooperative Regulation of the Induction of the Novel Antibacterial Listericin by Peptidoglycan Recognition Protein LE and the JAK-STAT Pathway. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285:15731–15738. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.082115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sullivan JC, Wolenski FS, Reitzel AM, French CE, Traylor-Knowles N, et al. Two Alleles of NF-κB in the Sea Anemone Nematostella vectensis Are Widely Dispersed in Nature and Encode Proteins with Distinct Activities. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.De Zoysa M, Nikapitiya C, Oh C, Whang I, Lee J-S, et al. Molecular evidence for the existence of lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-[alpha] factor (LITAF) and Rel/NF-kB pathways in disk abalone (Haliotis discus discus). Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 28:754–763. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2010.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Jiang Y, Wu X. Characterization of a Rel NF-[kappa]B homologue in a gastropod abalone, Haliotis diversicolor supertexta. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2007;31:121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2006.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Montagnani C, Kappler C, Reichhart JM, Escoubas JM. Cg-Rel, the first Rel/NF-[kappa]B homolog characterized in a mollusk, the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. FEBS Letters. 2004;561:75–82. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00124-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Nehyba J, Hrdličková R, Bose HR. Dynamic Evolution of Immune System Regulators: The History of the Interferon Regulatory Factor Family. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2009;26:2539–2550. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Malagoli D. Cytokine network in invertebrates: the very next phase of comparative immunology. Invertebrate Survival Journal. 2010;7:146–148. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Roberts S, Gueguen Y, de Lorgeril J, Goetz F. Rapid accumulation of an interleukin 17 homolog transcript in Crassostrea gigas hemocytes following bacterial exposure. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2008;32:1099–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2008.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Calandra T, Roger T. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a regulator of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:791–800. doi: 10.1038/nri1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wang B, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zou Z, Wang G, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of macrophage migration inhibitory factor from small abalone Haliotis diversicolor supertexta. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2009;27:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Li F, Huang S, Wang L, Yang J, Zhang H, et al. A macrophage migration inhibitory factor like gene from scallop Chlamys farreri: Involvement in immune response and wound healing. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2011;35:62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Goetz FW, Planas JV, MacKenzie S. Tumor necrosis factors. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2004;28:487–497. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2003.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.De Zoysa M, Jung S, Lee J. First molluscan TNF-[alpha] homologue of the TNF superfamily in disk abalone: Molecular characterization and expression analysis. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2009;26:625–631. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C, Ivanyi I, Appel RD, et al. ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003;31:3784–3788. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Robertson AJ, Croce J, Carbonneau S, Voronina E, Miranda E, et al. The genomic underpinnings of apoptosis in Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Developmental Biology. 2006;300:321–334. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Collette Y, Gilles A, Pontarotti P, Olive D. A co-evolution perspective of the TNFSF and TNFRSF families in the immune system. Trends in Immunology. 2003;24:387–394. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(03)00166-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Yu Y, Qiu L, Song L, Zhao J, Ni D, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of a putative lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-[alpha] factor (LITAF) gene homologue from Zhikong scallop Chlamys farreri. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2007;23:419–429. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2006.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zhang D, Jiang J, Jiang S, Ma J, Su T, et al. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of a putative LPS-induced TNF-[alpha] factor (LITAF) from pearl oyster Pinctada fucata. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2009;27:391–396. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2009.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Park E-M, Kim Y-O, Nam B-H, Kong HJ, Kim W-J, et al. Cloning, characterization and expression analysis of the gene for a putative lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-[alpha] factor of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2008;24:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2007.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hong YH, Lillehoj HS, Hyen Lee S, Woon Park D, Lillehoj EP. Molecular cloning and characterization of chicken lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-[alpha] factor (LITAF). Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2006;30:919–929. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2005.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Bolcato-Bellemin A-L, Mattei M-G, Fenton M, Amar S. Molecular cloning and characterization of mouse LITAF cDNA: role in the regulation of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) gene expression. Journal of Endotoxin Research. 2004;10:15–23. doi: 10.1179/096805104225003780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Arbouzova NI, Zeidler MP. JAK/STAT signalling in Drosophila: insights into conserved regulatory and cellular functions. Development. 2006;133:2605–2616. doi: 10.1242/dev.02411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.De Zoysa M, Lee J. Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS-2) homologue in disk abalone: Cloning, sequence characterization and expression analysis. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2009;26:500–508. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Otero-Gonzalez AJ, Magalhaes BS, Garcia-Villarino M, Lopez-Abarrategui C, Sousa DA, et al. Antimicrobial peptides from marine invertebrates as a new frontier for microbial infection control. FASEB J. 2010;24:1320–1334. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-143388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Mitta G, Vandenbulcke F, Roch P. Original involvement of antimicrobial peptides in mussel innate immunity. FEBS Letters. 2000;486:185–190. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)02192-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Mitta G, Hubert F, Dyrynda EA, Boudry P, Roch P. Mytilin B and MGD2, two antimicrobial peptides of marine mussels: gene structure and expression analysis. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2000;24:381–393. doi: 10.1016/s0145-305x(99)00084-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Nonaka M. The complement C3 protein family in invertebrates. ISJ. 2011;8:21–32. [Google Scholar]
- 101.Dishaw JL, Smith SL, Bigger CH. Characterization of a C3-like cDNA in a coral: phylogenetic implications. Immunogenetics. 2010;57:535–548. doi: 10.1007/s00251-005-0005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Zhu Y, Thangamani S, Ho B, Ding JL. The ancient origin of the complement system. Embo J. 2005;24:382–394. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Clow LA, Raftos DA, Gross PS, Smith LC. The sea urchin complement homologue, SpC3, functions as an opsonin. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2004;207:2147–2155. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Mogilenko DA, Kudryavtsev IV, Orlov SV, Kharasova AD, Polevschikov AV. Expression of the starfish complement component C3 gene homolog under the influence of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Molecular Biology. 2010;44:67–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Castillo MG, Goodson MS, McFall-Ngai M. Identification and molecular characterization of a complement C3 molecule in a lophotrochozoan, the Hawaiian bobtail squid Euprymna scolopes. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2009;33:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2008.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Prado-Alvarez M, Rotllant J, Gestal C, Novoa B, Figueras A. Characterization of a C3 and a factor B-like in the carpet-shell clam, Ruditapes decussatus. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2009;26:305–315. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Multerer K, Smith LC. Two cDNAs from the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, encoding mosaic proteins with domains found in factor H, factor I, and complement components C6 and C7. Immunogenetics. 2004;56:89–106. doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0665-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Nonaka M, Kimura A. Genomic view of the evolution of the complement system. Immunogenetics. 2006;58:701–713. doi: 10.1007/s00251-006-0142-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.He C, Klionsky DJ. Regulation Mechanisms and Signaling Pathways of Autophagy. Annual Reviews of Genetics. 2009;43:67–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102808-114910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Degterev A, Yuan J. Expansion and evolution of cell death programmes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:378–390. doi: 10.1038/nrm2393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Sokolova IM. Apoptosis in molluscan immune defense. Invertebrate Survival Journal. 2009;6:49–58. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Delgado M, Singh S, De Haro S, Master S, Ponpuak M, et al. Autophagy and pattern recognition receptors in innate immunity. Immunological Reviews. 2009;227:189–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00725.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Levine B, Deretic V. Unveiling the roles of autophagy in innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:767–777. doi: 10.1038/nri2161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Sanjuan MA, Dillon CP, Tait SWG, Moshiach S, Dorsey F, et al. Toll-like receptor signalling in macrophages links the autophagy pathway to phagocytosis. Nature. 2007;450:1253–1257. doi: 10.1038/nature06421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Moore MN, Viarengo A, Donkin P, Hawkins AJS. Autophagic and lysosomal reactions to stress in the hepatopancreas of blue mussels. Aquatic Toxicology. 2007;84:80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Rast JP, Smith LC, Loza-Coll M, Hibino T, Litman GW. Genomic Insights into the Immune System of the Sea Urchin. Science. 2006;314:952–956. doi: 10.1126/science.1134301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Obbard DJ, Welch JJ, Kim K-W, Jiggins FM. Quantifying Adaptive Evolution in the Drosophila Immune System. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Hulsen T, de Vlieg J, Alkema W. BioVenn - a web application for the comparison and visualization of biological lists using area-proportional Venn diagrams. BMC genomics. 2008;9:488. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Oeckinghaus A, Ghosh S. The NF-kB Family of Transcription Factors and Its Regulation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000034. doi: 101101/cshperspecta000034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Zhao J, Li C, Chen A, Li L, Su X, et al. Molecular Characterization of a Novel Big Defensin from Clam Venerupis philippinarum. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Zhao J, Song L, Li C, Ni D, Wu L, et al. Molecular cloning, expression of a big defensin gene from bay scallop Argopecten irradians and the antimicrobial activity of its recombinant protein. Molecular Immunology. 2007;44:360–368. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.