Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1990 Jun 11;18(11):3333–3337. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.11.3333

Charge dependence of Fe(II)-catalyzed DNA cleavage.

M Lu 1, Q Guo 1, D J Wink 1, N R Kallenbach 1
PMCID: PMC330941  PMID: 2356123

Abstract

The effect of charge of the Fe(II) reagent used to induce DNA strand cleavage reactions in the presence of a source of reducing equivalents is investigated using two oligonucleotide models. The first consists of the two strands dA20 and dT20, and an equimolar complex between them. The second is a short four-arm branched DNA complex composed of four 16-mer strands. In the former case, cleavage of the 1:1 complex by three reagents with different formal charge, Fe(II).EDTA2-, Fe(II).EDDA and Fe2+, is comparable in rate to that of the individual dT20 and the dA20 strands. While the three reagents show similar cleavage rates for the duplex and single stranded molecules, they give distinctive cutting patterns in the DNA tetramer, consistent with the presence of a site of excess negative charge at the branch point. Scission induced by Fe(II).EDTA2- shows lower reactivity at the branch site relative to duplex controls, whereas Fe(II)2+ shows enhanced reactivity. Formally neutral Fe(II).EDDA shows weak loss of cutting reactivity at the branch. The position of attack by Fe(II)2+ in the branched tetramer is shifted with respect to those of Fe(II).EDTA2- or Fe(II).EDDA; a slower migrating species is also detected in the scission of dA20.dT20 duplex by Fe(II) reaction. These results suggest that the Fe(II)2+ reaction proceeds by a different mechanism from the other agents. The difference in cutting profiles induced by the neutral and negatively charged chelated complexes is consistent with a local electrostatic repulsion of a negatively charged source of radicals, not a positively charged one.

Full text

PDF
3333

Images in this article

3335Image
on p.3335

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Churchill M. E., Tullius T. D., Kallenbach N. R., Seeman N. C. A Holliday recombination intermediate is twofold symmetric. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jul;85(13):4653–4656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.13.4653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooper J. P., Hagerman P. J. Gel electrophoretic analysis of the geometry of a DNA four-way junction. J Mol Biol. 1987 Dec 20;198(4):711–719. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90212-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper J. P., Hagerman P. J. Geometry of a branched DNA structure in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(19):7336–7340. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.19.7336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Duckett D. R., Murchie A. I., Diekmann S., von Kitzing E., Kemper B., Lilley D. M. The structure of the Holliday junction, and its resolution. Cell. 1988 Oct 7;55(1):79–89. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Galas D. J., Schmitz A. DNAse footprinting: a simple method for the detection of protein-DNA binding specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 Sep;5(9):3157–3170. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.9.3157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guo Q., Seeman N. C., Kallenbach N. R. Site-specific interaction of intercalating drugs with a branched DNA molecule. Biochemistry. 1989 Mar 21;28(6):2355–2359. doi: 10.1021/bi00432a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hertzberg R. P., Dervan P. B. Cleavage of DNA with methidiumpropyl-EDTA-iron(II): reaction conditions and product analyses. Biochemistry. 1984 Aug 14;23(17):3934–3945. doi: 10.1021/bi00312a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Imlay J. A., Linn S. DNA damage and oxygen radical toxicity. Science. 1988 Jun 3;240(4857):1302–1309. doi: 10.1126/science.3287616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jezewska M. J., Bujalowski W., Lohman T. M. Iron(II)-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid catalyzed cleavage of DNA is highly specific for duplex DNA. Biochemistry. 1989 Jul 25;28(15):6161–6164. doi: 10.1021/bi00441a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuwabara M., Yoon C., Goyne T., Thederahn T., Sigman D. S. Nuclease activity of 1,10-phenanthroline-copper ion: reaction with CGCGAATTCGCG and its complexes with netropsin and EcoRI. Biochemistry. 1986 Nov 18;25(23):7401–7408. doi: 10.1021/bi00371a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marshall L. E., Graham D. R., Reich K. A., Sigman D. S. Cleavage of deoxyribonucleic acid by the 1,10-phenanthroline-cuprous complex. Hydrogen peroxide requirement and primary and secondary structure specificity. Biochemistry. 1981 Jan 20;20(2):244–250. doi: 10.1021/bi00505a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Murchie A. I., Clegg R. M., von Kitzing E., Duckett D. R., Diekmann S., Lilley D. M. Fluorescence energy transfer shows that the four-way DNA junction is a right-handed cross of antiparallel molecules. Nature. 1989 Oct 26;341(6244):763–766. doi: 10.1038/341763a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schmitz A., Galas D. J. The interaction of RNA polymerase and lac repressor with the lac control region. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Jan;6(1):111–137. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.1.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Seeman N. C., Chen J. H., Kallenbach N. R. Gel electrophoretic analysis of DNA branched junctions. Electrophoresis. 1989 May-Jun;10(5-6):345–354. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150100512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tullius T. D., Dombroski B. A. Hydroxyl radical "footprinting": high-resolution information about DNA-protein contacts and application to lambda repressor and Cro protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Aug;83(15):5469–5473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.15.5469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tullius T. D., Dombroski B. A. Iron(II) EDTA used to measure the helical twist along any DNA molecule. Science. 1985 Nov 8;230(4726):679–681. doi: 10.1126/science.2996145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES