Abstract
N-heterocyclic carbenes catalyze the rearrangement of 1,1-bis(arylsulfonyl)ethylene to the corresponding trans-1,2-bis(phenylsulfonyl) under mild conditions. Tandem rearrangement/cycloadditions have been developed to capitalize on this new process and generate highly substituted isoxazolines and additional heterocyclic compounds. Preliminary mechanistic studies support a new conjugate addition/Umpolung process involving the ejection and subsequent unusual re-addition of a sulfinate ion.
Metal free catalysis has undergone a renaissance over the last decade, leading to an explosion of efficient and stereoselective strategies for chemical synthesis.1 In the area of Lewis base-promoted reactions,2 N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalysis is a rapidly growing field that employs electron lone pair-bearing heterocycles to facilitate a wide breadth of chemical transformations.3 Carbene catalysis is highly versatile and allows access to acyl anions,4 homoenolates,5 enolates,6 Cannizarro-type reductions,3c and oxidations.7 The majority of NHC catalysis currently involves the 1,2-addition of the carbene to a carbonyl-containing species which then proceeds to produce an acyl anion or homoenolate equivalent. A different mode for these nucleophilic catalysts is a conjugate addition manifold. By capitalizing on this 1,4-type reactivity, both Fu and Ye have separately reported the development of β-Umpolung-type and Morita-Baylis-Hilman reactions catalyzed by NHCs, respectively.8 This conjugate addition process provides a new direction beyond 1,2-additions. In this work, the combination of an NHC with a vinyl sulfone and nitrone results in the formation of an isoxazolidine product with an unusual transposition of a sulfone group (eqn 1). This process fundamentally differs from the previous 1,4 additions because it is neither an intramolecular alkylation8a nor a MBH reaction.8b
Vinyl sulfones are useful intermediates in organic synthesis that can act as 2π participants in cycloadditions9 and as electrophiles in organometallic10 and organocatalysis.11 When we began these specific studies, the use of vinyl sulfones as substrates in NHC-catalyzed transformations had not been previously reported. In our attempts to achieve homoenolate equivalent annulations with 1,1-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene (1), we discovered that the carbene derived from triazolium A promoted an unanticipated rearrangement to the trans-1,2-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene in 96% yield with a t1/2 of ~6 h at 40 °C (2, eqn 2).
The isomerization of 1,1-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene to date involves harsh, non-catalytic reaction conditions such as autoclave with high pressure (no isolated yield) or ammonium salts at 140 °C.12 Our survey of standard Lewis bases for this process, such as 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) and triphenylphosphine, revealed there was poor and incomplete conversion when compared to the NHC catalyst generated from azolium catalyst A and sodium tert-butoxide.13 Trans-1,2-bis(arylsulfonyl)ethylene has been used in organic synthesis,14 but its preparation typically involves the use of vinyl chloride gas.15 Alternatively, the straightforward preparation of 1,1-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene involves paraformaldehyde, piperidine, and acid.12b
2. Results and discussion
We viewed this unusual NHC-catalyzed generation of trans-1,2-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene in situ under mild reaction conditions as an interesting opportunity to develop a two-step single flash process involving a cycloaddition step (vide infra). The initial test bed reaction we chose was the formation of the isomerization product in a one-pot process with a nitrone in a Huisgen [3 + 2] cyclization to form the isoxazolidine product.16 Our optimization studies for this NHC-catalyzed reaction began by treating the 1,1-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene with N-aryl nitrone and surveying various azolium salts and reaction conditions (Table 1). Of the azolium salts, triazolium A was the only catalyst which led to appreciable amounts of desired cycloadduct 4. Notably, the cycloaddition yielded a single diastereomer (as observed by 1H NMR spectroscopy).17 The reduction of catalyst loading from 20 to 10 mol% of A resulted in significant depression of yield for the two-step process (rearrangement/cycloaddition). Further experimentation revealed dichloromethane as the best solvent and sodium tert-butoxide was the optimal base, presumably since its minimal nucleophilicity did not compete with the NHC for addition to the vinyl sulfone.18
Table 1.
| ||
---|---|---|
Entry | Conditionsa | Yield [%]b |
1 | 20 mol% B, 40 °C, CH2Cl2 | Trace |
2 | 20 mol% C, 40 °C, CH2Cl2 | 4 |
3 | 20 mol% A, 40 °C, CH2Cl2 | 94 |
4 | 10 mol% A, 40 °C, CH2Cl2 | 37 |
5 | 20 mol% A, 40 °C, CH3CN | 0 |
6 | 20 mol% A, 40 °C, THF | 50 |
General conditions: vinyl sulfone (1 equiv), nitrone (3 equiv), NaOt-Bu (20 mol%), solvent (0.10 M), 4 Å MS.
Yield of isolated products.
With the optimized reaction conditions, we examined the scope of the reaction with regard to the nitrone component (Table 2). A chloride substituent in the 4 position of the N-aryl ring delivered the products in good yields, presumably due to the increased electrophilicity of the nitrone being complimentary to the cyclization step (entries 1–7). Increasing the temperature to 40 °C and adding 4 Å molecular sieves generally improved conversion and yields. Reactions with N-aryl nitrones with non-electron withdrawing groups provided moderate yields and an N-alkyl nitrone provided 86% of the desired cycloadduct (entry 13). Similar to the initial optimization reaction in Scheme 1, the isoxazolidine products were observed as a single diastereomer (1H NMR, 500 MHz). Substituted aryl sulfones are also compatible with the system (entries 14–16), but currently both sulfones are required. With these NHC conditions, mixed sulfone/carbonyl group compounds are not substrates and neither are β-substituted bis-sulfones.
Table 2.
| |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Entry | R | Ar | Ar1 | d.r. | Yield [%] |
1 | 4-ClPh | Ph | Ph | >20 : 1 | 94 (4) |
2 | 4-ClPh | 4-BrPh | Ph | >20 : 1 | 87 (5) |
3 | 4-ClPh | 4-MePh | Ph | >20 : 1 | 61 (6) |
4 | 4-ClPh | 4-ClPh | Ph | >20 : 1 | 76 (7) |
5 | 4-ClPh | 2-Napth | Ph | >20 : 1 | 74 (8) |
6 | 4-ClPh | 2-ClPh | Ph | >20 : 1 | 75 (9) |
7 | 4-ClPh | 4-MeOPh | Ph | >20 : 1 | 71 (10)c |
8 | Ph | 2-ClPh | Ph | >20 : 1 | 81 (11)c |
9 | Ph | 4-MeOPh | Ph | >20 : 1 | 63 (12)c |
10 | Ph | 4-MePh | Ph | >20 : 1 | 70 (13)c |
11 | Ph | 2-Napth | Ph | >20 : 1 | 77 (14)c |
12 | 4-MePh | 4-ClPh | Ph | >20 : 1 | 75 (15)c |
13 | PhCH2 | Ph | Ph | >20 : 1 | 86 (16)c |
14 | 4-ClPh | Ph | 4-MePh | >20 : 1 | 72 (17)d |
15 | 4-ClPh | Ph | 4-BrPh | >20 : 1 | 60 (18)d |
16 | Ph | Ph | 4-MePh | >20 : 1 | 77 (19)d |
General conditions: vinyl sulfone (1 equiv), nitrone (1.05 equiv), azolium salt A (20 mol%), NaOt-Bu (20 mol%), CH2Cl2 (0.10 M).
Yield of isolated products.
Vinyl sulfone (2 equiv), nitrone (1 equiv).
1,2-dichloroethane (0.10 M), 40 °C, no 4 Å MS.
Since N-alkyl nitrones are productive substrates, this tandem 1,1-1,2 rearrangement/cycloaddition with a D-ribose-based chiral auxiliary is highly selective and provides the optically active isoxazoline in 65% yield as a single diastereomer (Scheme 3, eqn 3).19 Importantly, this streamlined process is not limited to nitrones20 as the dipole coupling partner. For example, azomethine imines (such as 22) and dienes (including furan) undergo efficient reactions in [3 + 2] and [4 + 2] cycloaddition21 reactions (respectively, eqn 4 and 5).
We performed the studies outlined below to a) determine if the NHC was involved in the Huisgen cycloaddition,22 and b) provide insight into the mechanism of the sulfone rearrangement process. Our initial control experiments showed the triazolium salt and base were not needed for the cycloaddition with trans-1,2-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene, thereby supporting an uncatalyzed thermal [3 + 2] process.23
To further probe the proposed NHC-catalyzed isomerization mechanism, a cross-over experiment with 1,1-bis(tosyl)ethylene (24) and 1,1-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene (1) was performed (Scheme 4, eqn 6). The two different 1,1-sulfones were placed in the same reaction mixture and subjected to the NHC reaction conditions from Table 2. Based on the high resolution mass spectrometry (EI), the cross-over product (25) was present in the reaction mixture in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio with the trans-1,2-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene (2) and trans-1,2-bis(tosyl)ethylene (26).24 Additionally, we have exposed a 1 : 1 mixture of 2 and 26 to the NHC conditions and observed compound 25, thereby supporting that the NHC-addition/sulfinate ejection/addition pathway is operative with 1,2-bis(arylsulfonyl)ethylenes and underscoring the complexity and dynamic aspects of this process.
In addition to the cross over experiments, the reaction with a 13C-labeled isomer of bis-vinyl sulfone 1 provided evidence for the isomerization of the sulfonyl groups occurring prior to cyclization (Scheme 4, eqn 8). Based on the proposed reaction pathway in Scheme 5, there should be a mixture of 13C-labeled products (27 and 28) if the isomerization occurs prior to Huisgen cycloaddition with the nitrone. Alternatively, if there is only 13C-labeled vinyl sulfone isomer present at the cycloaddition step, then this label would be in a single position in the product. A cycloadduct with a singularly labeled position would necessitate a difficult migration of a sulfone moiety after formation of an initial isoxazoline product. The use of 1* provided a mixture of isotope-labeled isoxazolidine products as observed by NMR spectroscopy.23
Based on the data above, our proposed pathway of the NHC-induced sulfone rearrangement involves the carbene addition to the beta position of 1,1-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene (Scheme 5). The nucleophilic addition of the NHC to the vinyl sulfone drives the process. After protonation of the intermediate anion (I), base can remove a β-proton of II due to the stabilization of the anion by the triazolium catalyst, thus promoting the ejection of a sulfinate moiety from III.25 The sulfinate group then undergoes intermolecular addition at the beta position of IV to produce another nucleophilic anion (V).26 This sulfinate rebound promotes the regeneration of the NHC catalyst through elimination and the formation of the trans-1,2-bis(phenylsulfonyl) ethylene. The mixed arylsulfone product (25) from the cross over experiment in eqn 6 supports this unusual ejection/rebound of a sulfinate group.
Conclusions
We have discovered that triazolium-derived carbenes promote the facile rearrangement of 1,1-bis(arylsulfonyl)ethylenes to trans-1,2-bis(arlylsulfonyl)ethylenes. We have combined this new sulfone transposition reaction with subsequent cycloadditions to provide a single flask, tandem rearrangement/cycloaddition process. The combination of the 1,1-bis(arylsulfonyl)ethylene, a nitrone and an NHC provides highly substituted isoxazolines through a stereoselective [3 + 2] Huisgen cylcoaddition. Mechanistic studies support an unusual carbene-promoted ejection and then re-addition of a sulfinate group. This NHC-catalyzed reaction is unusual in that the substrates are vinyl sulfones and not the standard reaction partner: α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compound, ketone, or aldehyde. Further methodology development with this promising NHC reactivity pattern and its application in chemical synthesis is under investigation.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Support for this work was provided by the NIH (GM73072-01) and an NIGMS Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research (to R.L.A.). We thank the Integrated Molecular Structure Education and Research Center (IMSERC) at NU for assistance with mass spectrometry and John M. Roberts (NU) for assistance with X-ray crystallography.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures and spectroscopic data for all new compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/c1sc00194a
Notes and references
- 1.(a) Dalko P, Moisan L. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:5138–5175. doi: 10.1002/anie.200400650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) List B. Chem Commun. 2006:819–824. doi: 10.1039/b514296m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) MacMillan DWC. Nature. 2008;455:304–308. doi: 10.1038/nature07367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Doyle AG, Jacobsen EN. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5713–5743. doi: 10.1021/cr068373r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Bertelsen S, Jorgensen KA. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:2178–2189. doi: 10.1039/b903816g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Kampen D, Reisinger CM, List B. Top Curr Chem. 2010;291:395–456. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02815-1_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Denmark SE, Beutner GL. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2008;47:1560–1638. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Enders D, Balensiefer T. Acc Chem Res. 2004;37:534–541. doi: 10.1021/ar030050j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nolan SP, editor. N-heterocyclic Carbenes in Synthesis. Wiley-VCH; 2006. [Google Scholar]; (c) Enders D, Niemeier O, Henseler A. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5606–5655. doi: 10.1021/cr068372z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Nair V, Vellalath S, Babu B. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:2691–2698. doi: 10.1039/b719083m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Phillips EM, Chan A, Scheidt KA. Aldrichimica Acta. 2009;42:55–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) More JL, Rovis T. Top Curr Chem. 2010;291:77–144. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02815-1_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ugai T, Tanaka S, Dokawa S. J Pharm Soc Jpn. 1943;63:269.Breslow R. J Am Chem Soc. 1958;80:3719–3726.Hachisu Y, Bode JW, Suzuki K. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:8432–8433. doi: 10.1021/ja035308f.Chan A, Scheidt K. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:4558–4559. doi: 10.1021/ja060833a.For asymmetric variants, see; Enders D, Breuer K, Runsink J, Teles JH. Helv Chim Acta. 1996;79:1899–1902.Enders D, Breuer K, Teles JH. Helv Chim Acta. 1996;79:1217–1221.Enders D, Kallfass U. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:1743–1745. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020517)41:10<1743::aid-anie1743>3.0.co;2-q.Kerr MS, de Alaniz JR, Rovis T. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:10298–10299. doi: 10.1021/ja027411v.
- 5.Burstein C, Glorius F. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:6205–6208. doi: 10.1002/anie.200461572.Sohn SS, Rosen EL, Bode JW. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:14370–14371. doi: 10.1021/ja044714b.Chan A, Scheidt K. Org Lett. 2005;7:905–908. doi: 10.1021/ol050100f.Nair V, Vellalath S, Poonoth M, Suresh E. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:8736–8737. doi: 10.1021/ja0625677.Chan A, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:5334–5335. doi: 10.1021/ja0709167.Phillips EM, Wadamoto M, Chan A, Scheidt KA. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:3107–3110. doi: 10.1002/anie.200605235.Nair V, Mathew SC, Biju AT, Suresh E. Angew Chem. 2007;119:2116–2119. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604025.Chan A, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:2740–2741. doi: 10.1021/ja711130p.Phillips EM, Reynolds TE, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:2416–2417. doi: 10.1021/ja710521m.For NHC catalysis with Lewis acids, see; Cardinal-David B, Raup DEA, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:5345–5347. doi: 10.1021/ja910666n.Raup DEA, Cardinal-David B, Holte D, Scheidt KA. Nat Chem. 2010;2:766–771. doi: 10.1038/nchem.727.
- 6.(a) Chow K, Bode J. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:8126–8127. doi: 10.1021/ja047407e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Reynolds N, Rovis T. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:16406–16407. doi: 10.1021/ja055918a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Phillips EM, Wadamoto M, Chan A, Scheidt KA. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:3107–3110. doi: 10.1002/anie.200605235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Song JJ, Tan Z, Reeves JT, Fandrick DR, Yee NK, Senanayake CH. Org Lett. 2008;10:877–880. doi: 10.1021/ol703025b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Huang XL, Chen XY, Ye S. J Org Chem. 2009;74:7585–7587. doi: 10.1021/jo901656q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Phillips EM, Wadamoto M, Roth HS, Scheidt KA. Org Lett. 2009;11:105–108. doi: 10.1021/ol802448c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Kawanaka Y, Phillips EM, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:18028–18029. doi: 10.1021/ja9094044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Phillips EM, Wadamoto M, Roth HS, Ott AW, Scheidt KA. Org Lett. 2009;11:105–108. doi: 10.1021/ol802448c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Castells J, Llitjos H, Morenomanas M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977;2:205–206. [Google Scholar]; (b) Inoue H, Higashiura K. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 1980:549–550. [Google Scholar]; (c) Miyashita A, Suzuki Y, Nagasaki I, Ishiguro C, Iwamoto K, Higashino T. Chem Pharm Bull. 1997;45:1254–1258. [Google Scholar]; (d) Maki BE, Chan A, Phillips EM, Scheidt KA. Org Lett. 2007;9:371–374. doi: 10.1021/ol062940f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Maki BE, Scheidt KA. Org Lett. 2008;10:4331–4334. doi: 10.1021/ol8018488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Maki BE, Chan A, Phillips EM, Scheidt KA. Tetrahedron. 2009;65:3102–3109. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2008.10.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) De Sarkar S, Grimme S, Studer A. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:1190–1191. doi: 10.1021/ja910540j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Fischer C, Smith SW, Powell DA, Fu GC. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:1472–1473. doi: 10.1021/ja058222q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) He L, Jian TY, Ye S. J Org Chem. 2007;72:7466–7468. doi: 10.1021/jo071247i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fuchs PL, Braish TF. Chem Rev. 1986;86:903–917.Simpkins N. Tetrahedron. 1990;46:6951–6984.For vinyl sulfones in organocatalysis, see; Nielsen M, Jacobsen CB, Holub N, Paixão MW, Jørgensen KA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:2668–2679. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906340.
- 10.Grela K, Bieniek M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:6425–6428. [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Mossé S, Alexakis A. Org Lett. 2005;7:4361–4364. doi: 10.1021/ol051488h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mossé S, Laars M, Kriis K, Kanger T, Alexakis A. Org Lett. 2006;8:2559–2562. doi: 10.1021/ol0607490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhu Q, Cheng L, Lu Y. Chem Commun. 2008:6315–6317. doi: 10.1039/b816307c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zhu Q, Lu Y. Org Lett. 2008;10:4803–4806. doi: 10.1021/ol8019296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Landa A, Maestro M, Masdeu C, Puente Á, Vera S, Oiarbide M, Palomo C. Chem–Eur J. 2009;15:1562–1565. doi: 10.1002/chem.200802441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Zhu Q, Lu Y. Org Lett. 2009;11:1721–1724. doi: 10.1021/ol9003349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Moteki SA, Xu S, Arimitsu S, Maruoka K. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:17074–17076. doi: 10.1021/ja107897t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Quintard A, Alexakis A, Mazet C. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50:1393–1396. doi: 10.1002/anie.201007001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Xiao J, Lu YP, Liu YL, Wong PS, Loh TP. Org Lett. 2011;13:876–879. doi: 10.1021/ol102933q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.(a) Stetter H, Steinbeck K. Liebigs Ann Chem. 1974:1315–1321. [Google Scholar]; (b) Naplyuev VM, Bazavova IM. Zh Org Khim. 1981;17:2231–2232. [Google Scholar]
- 13.The reaction conditions were Lewis base (20 mol%), dichloromethane (0.1(M)), and 1,1-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene.
- 14.(a) Mirsadeghi S, Rickborn B. J Org Chem. 1985;50:4340–4345. [Google Scholar]; (b) McCombie SW, Shankar BB, Ganguly AK. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985;26:6301–6304. [Google Scholar]; (c) Pacquette LA, Kuenzer H, Green KE, De Lucchi O, Licini G, Pasquato L, Valle G. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:3453–3460. [Google Scholar]; (d) Padwa A, Bullock WH, Dyszlewski AD, McCombie SW, Shankar BB, Ganguly AK. J Org Chem. 1991;56:3556–3564. [Google Scholar]; (e) Feldman KS, Weinreb CK, Youngs WJ, Bradshaw JD. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:9019–9026. [Google Scholar]; (f) Evans PA, Manangan T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:8165–8168. [Google Scholar]; (g) Nicolau KC, Pfefferkorn JA, Kim S, Weo HX. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:4724–4725. [Google Scholar]; (h) Evans PA, Manangan T. J Org Chem. 2000;65:4523–4528. doi: 10.1021/jo991970b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Chery F, Rollin P, De Lucchi O, Cossu S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:2357–2360. [Google Scholar]; (j) Chery F, Rollin P, De Lucchi O, Cossu S. Synthesis. 2001;2:286–292. [Google Scholar]; (k) Berlin S, Ericsson C, Engman L. J Org Chem. 2003;68:8386–8396. doi: 10.1021/jo030153f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (l) Schaffner AP, Darmency V, Renaud P. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45:5847–5849. doi: 10.1002/anie.200601206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (m) Ruano JLG, Aleman J, Paredes CG. Org Lett. 2006;8:2683–2686. doi: 10.1021/ol060608y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (n) Lopez-Perez A, Robles-Machin R, Adrio J, Carretero JC. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:9261–9264. doi: 10.1002/anie.200703258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (o) Luethy M, Darmency V, Renaud P. Eur J Org Chem. 2011;3:547–552. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reddy D, Babu N, Padmavathi V, Sumathi R. Synthesis. 1999:491–494. [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Huisgen R. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1963;2:565–632. [Google Scholar]; (b) Huisgen R. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1968;7:321–406. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stereochemistry of 4 determined by X-ray crystallography and other assignments made by analogy. See Supporting Information Confalone PN, Huie EM. Org React. 1988;36:1.Burdisso M, Gandolfi R, Grunanger P, Rastelli A. J Org Chem. 1990;55:3427–3429.and references cited therein; Osborn HMI, Gemmell N, Harwood LM. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 1. 2002;(22):2419–2438.Grigorev IA. In: Nitrile Oxides, Nitrones and Nitronates in Organic Synthesis: Novel Strategies in Synthesis. 2. Feuer H, editor. John Wiley & Sons; UK: 2008. pp. 129–434.
- 18.Additional bases (Et3N, DBU, i-Pr2EtN, TBD, 2,6-lutidine, sodium amylate, KO t-Bu, K2CO3) were also examined and gave inferior results.
- 19.(a) Kiso M, Hasegawa A. Carbohydr Res. 1976;52:95–101. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6215(00)85954-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Vasella A. Helv Chim Acta. 1977;60:426–446. [Google Scholar]; (c) Vasella A. Helv Chim Acta. 1977;60:1273–1295. [Google Scholar]; (d) Thompson DK, Hubert CN, Wightman RH. Tetrahedron. 1993;49:3827–3840. [Google Scholar]; (e) Mzengeza S, Whitney RA. J Org Chem. 1988;53:4074–4081. [Google Scholar]; (f) Kasahara K, Iida H, Kibayashi C. J Org Chem. 1989;54:2225–2233. [Google Scholar]; (g) Machetti F, Cordero FM, De Sarlo F, Guarna A, Brandi A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:4205–4208. [Google Scholar]; (h) Chiacchio U, Corsaro A, Gumina G, Rescifina A, Iannazzo D, Piperno A, Romeo G, Romeo R. J Org Chem. 1999;64:9321–9327. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Burdisso M, Gamba A, Gandolgi R. Tetrahedron. 1988;44:3735–3748. [Google Scholar]
- 21.De Lucchi O, Modena G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983;24:1653–1656. [Google Scholar]
- 22.A possible NHC-catalyzed Huisgen cycloaddition pathway would involve the addition of the Lewis base to trans-1,2-bis (phenylsulfonyl)ethylene (2) produced in situ, thereby generating a stabilized carbanion. The addition of this plausible intermediate to the nitrone followed by an intramolecular SN2 reaction would generate the free NHC catalyst and isoxazoline product.
- 23.The possible role of the NHC in the [3 + 2] cycloaddition was investigated through the comparison of the overall rates with a) trans-1,2-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene and nitrone 3, b) trans-1,2-bis (phenylsulfonyl)ethylene with nitrone 3, azolium A, and sodium tert-butoxide, and c) trans-1,2-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene with nitrone 3 and sodium tert-butoxide. Based on the observed rates of these three reactions (as determined by HPLC), the NHC does not accelerate the [3 + 2] cycloaddition step relative to the thermal process.
- 24.See supporting information† for details.
- 25.Alexakis has reported an unusual 1,2 to 1,1 rearrangement under a proline-mediated organocatalytic addition of aldehydes to cis-1,2-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene. This process is fundamentally different than carbene catalysed reaction here (vs. proline catalysis) and proceeds in the opposite sense of migration relative to the results reported herein. They propose an intramolecular migration of the sulfinate ion: Quintard A, Alexakis A. Chem–Eur J. 2009;15:11109–11113. doi: 10.1002/chem.200901535.
- 26.Balenkova observed the unexpected phenylsulfonyl group migration to the beta position with their work with β-trifluoroacetylketene diphenyldithioacetal S, S-tetroxide, see: Krazovsky AL, Druzhinin SV, Nenajdenko VG, Balenkova ES. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:1129–1132.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.