Summary
Recurrence is the main drawback of aneurysmal coiling. Additional coiling must sometimes be considered in patients with reopened aneurysms and expose the patient to the risk of a new procedure. Our purpose was to assess the procedural complications of additional endovascular treatments in patients with previously coiled but recurrent aneurysms treated by two neurointerventionalists during a decade in a single center.
Between 1999 and 2009, 637 intracranial aneurysms were coiled and had a clinical and angiographic follow-up at our institution. Following the first embolization, 44 aneurysms were retreated with coils and 11 were retreated a second time. Retreatment was decided when a recurrence showed at angiographic follow-up. Early retreatments, performed in the first month after an incomplete or failed initial coiling, were excluded.
We retrospectively analysed the procedural complications, rebleeding, clinical and angiographic outcomes of the retreatments. No death or bleeding occurred in these 55 additional procedures. We had three periprocedural thromboembolic complications and the procedural permanent morbidity was 1.8%. Clinical and angiographic follow-ups ranged from six months to nine years (mean: 37 months, median: 36 months). Thirty-seven of the 44 retreated aneurysms (84%) showed a stable occlusion at follow-up. Seven showed a recurrence but were not retreated due to the stability of the packing. No rebleeding was observed during the follow-up period. Our results show that endovascular treatment of recurrent aneurysms is associated with a low procedural risk.
Key words: detachable coils, endovascular treatment, intracranial aneurysms, outcome
Introduction
Embolization has proven to be a safe and efficient treatment for intracranial aneurysms 1-3, although recurrence remains a major concern of the endovascular treatment compared to clipping 4-11. Recurrence may expose patients to bleeding or re-bleeding 12 and an additional procedure should be considered.
For this study, we retrospectively reviewed the retreatment cases done over the last ten years at our institution. We collected the procedure-related complications as well as recorded bleeding(s) or rebleeding(s) after retreatment.
Material and Methods
Patients and Aneurysm Characteristics in the Studied Population
Between July 1999 and June 2009, 760 patients bearing 840 aneurysms were admitted for endovascular treatment at our institution (330 aneurysms from 1999 to 2004 and 510 from 2005 to 2009). Mycotic, dissecting and inflammatory aneurysms were excluded from the study.
One hundred and six patients were lost at follow-up and 92 patients died from their initial haemorrhage. 562 patients (637 treated aneurysms) had a clinical and angiographic follow-up. Of the 637 aneurysms, 248 were treated between 1999 and 2004 (39%) and 389 between 2004 and 2009 (61%). Three hundred and sixty-five patients were women (65%) and 197 were men (35%); 64.5% (411) of the lesions were ruptured, 34.5% (219) were unruptured. In seven cases (1%), there was a doubt as to whether there was an initial haemorrhage.
Aneurysms were located as follows: 195 on the anterior communicating artery (30.6%), 226 (35.5%) on the internal carotid and among them 91 (14.4%) were at the origin of the posterior communicating artery, 131 on the middle cerebral artery (20.5%), 24 (3.8%) on the anterior cerebral artery, 61 (9.6%) on the posterior circulation (vertebral – 5, basilar trunk – 30, postero-inferior cerebellar – 18, posterior cerebral – 5, cerebellars other than PICA – 3).
16 (2.5%) were giant aneurysms, 125 (19.6%) had a diameter equal to or greater than 10 mm and 496 (77.9%) were smaller than 10 mm.
After coiling, occlusion of the aneurysms was classified according to the Roy et al. scale 13. Post-treatment results showed a complete occlusion in 367 aneurysms and incomplete in 270 aneurysms (205 were classified as grade 2 and 65 as grade 3).
Follow-up
The treated aneurysms were included in a routine follow-up program consisting of a medical consultation and angiography between the third and sixth months, between the 12th and the 18th month, and at five and ten years after the coiling procedure. If an aneurysm remnant or a change in treatment result was detected on any of the follow-up angiograms, additional angiograms were obtained at shorter intervals. Clinical and angiographic follow-up ranged from ten years to six months.
Patients and Recurrent Aneurysms Characteristics in the Retreated Population
During the decade, 44 recurrent aneurysms (43 patients) were retreated once, and 11 of them required a third embolization session (total: 55 procedures). Subsequent treatments were performed if an anatomic change was seen at angiography control. Aneurysms incompletely occluded after initial coiling and treated again the following month (7 procedures, 6 patients) were not considered as recurrent and were excluded from the study.
Recurrences occurred after initial simple coiling in 32 cases, and in 12 cases after coiling associated with adjunctive techniques: intracranial stent in two cases and remodelling balloon in ten cases. Of the 44 retreated recurrent aneurysms, eight were not ruptured (18%) and 36 (82%) had bled. Among the 43 patients, 23 (53.5%) were women and 20 (46.5%) were men. Age varied from 26 to 70 years; 35% (15) of the patients were smokers, 30% (13) had hypertension, and one patient had polycystic kidney disease. Four of the retreated aneurysms were giant (9%), 16 were large (36%) and 24 (54%) were less than 10 mm; 18 (41%) were located on the ACom, 16 (36%) were on the intracranial internal carotid and among them seven were located at the origin of the PCom, seven (16%) were on the MCA, three (7%) were located on the posterior circulation (1 on the intracranial vertebral artery, 1 on the basilar artery and 1 on the postero-inferior cerebellar artery).
The additional procedures consisted of coiling the remnants in 17 cases (31%). Coiling was associated with remodeling balloon in 24 cases (43.6%) and with stenting in 14 cases (25.4%).
Follow-up ranged from six months to nine years (mean: 37 months, median: 36 months). After retreatment, the patients entered the standard angiography follow-up program again. A treatment result was considered stable if two consecutive angiograms, within a minimum 12-month interval, were identical.
Statistics
The factors predicting aneurysmal retreatment were assessed. Age (≥60 vs <60), sex, aneurysm rupture, location of the aneurysm, and aneurysm size ≥10 mm were analyzed using the chi-squared test; p values <0.05 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Patient and Recurrent Aneurysm Characteristics
Over a period of ten years, 44 out of 637 aneurysms (6.9 %) required a second or third endovascular procedure for late recurrence. During the first part of the study (1999-2004), 10% of the aneurysms (25) were retreated whereas 4.9% (19) were retreated between 2004 and 2009. The second treatment occurred between three and 99 months after the initial treatment (mean: 18.7 months). The delay between the second and third procedure ranged from nine to 62 months (mean: 26 months).
Retreatment was carried out in the ruptured aneurysmal group (9 %) more frequently than in the unruptured one (3.5%) (p<0.01). Sex, age, and aneurysm locations of the aneurysm were not predictive factors of retreatment (Table 1). However, giant or large aneurysms were more often retreated than lesions smaller than 10 mm (p<0.01).
Table 1.
Variables | Patients (N°) | Retreated Patients (incidence%) |
p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | ≥ 60 years | 138 | 9 (6.5%) | p>0.9 |
< 60 years | 424 | 34 (8%) | ||
Sex | males | 197 | 19 (9.6%) | p>0.5 |
females | 365 | 24 (6.6%) | ||
Variables | Aneurysms (N°) | Retreated aneurysms (incidence %) |
p value | |
Initial presentation | Ruptured | 411 | 36 (8.75%) | p<0.01 |
Unruptured | 219 | 8 (3.65%) | ||
Aneurysmal size | ≥ 10 mm | 141 | 21 (14.9%) | p<0.01 |
< 10 mm | 496 | 23 (4.6%) | ||
Aneurysmal location |
AComA* | 195 | 17 (8.7%) | p>0.3 |
ICA* | 226 | 17 (7.5%) | p>0.2 | |
MCA* | 131 | 7 (5.5%) | p>0.2 | |
posterior circulation aneurysms* |
61 | 3 (5%) | p>0.3 | |
* AComA: anterior communicating artery; ICA: internal carotid artery; MCA: middle cerebral artery; posterior circulation aneurysms: defined as posterior cerebral artery, vertebral artery, basilar artery, superior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, and posterior inferior cerebellar artery). |
Retreatment Indication
The decision to retreat was based on the modification of aneurysm occlusion at angiographic follow-up.
In 20 cases, the occlusion had moved from grade 1 to grade 2 or 3 of the Roy scale.
In 30, the remnant had changed from grade 2 to grade 3. In five cases with an initial grade 3, retreatment was performed for worsening of angiographic images. In no case was the retreatment consecutive to rebleeding.
Periprocedural Complications
No death or periprocedural bleeding occurred during the 55 retreatment procedures. We had three thromboembolic complications. The first patient presented with an ischemia (aphasia and hemiplegia) after the procedure. This patient, treated in 2004, progressively recovered over the following years and was assessed Modified Rankin grade 1 in 2010. The second patient presented with a post-procedural deficit which resolved on day 1. In the third case, thromboemboli occluded an anterior cerebral artery during the procedure. rtPA was injected in situ and the patient woke up with no neurologic deficit.
Until April 2003, the anticoagulation protocol consisted of an intravenous bolus of heparin (50 U/Kg) at the beginning of the procedure. The three thromboembolic complications occurred during this period. The other 41 lesions were retreated after April 2003 and, in addition to the IV bolus of heparin, patients received a daily dose of Clopidogrel (75 mg) and aspirin (75 mg) at least six days before the treatment. These patients continued to receive Clopidogrel and aspirin, two and six months after treatment.
We also have to report one technical complication. A coil was damaged and had to be stretched and secured at the groin but there was no clinical consequence for the patient. Overall, the permanent morbidity rate related to the retreatment was 1.8%.
Angiographic Results after Retreatment
After retreatment of the 44 aneurysms (33 retreated once and 11 retreated a second time), post-embolization angiography showed complete occlusion in 25 cases, 19 aneurysms were classified in grade 2 of the Roy scale and 0 in grade 3.
Outcome
At follow-up, 37 lesions were stable and seven had moved from grade 1 to grade 2: four of them were followed up during more than 24 months and did not show any change; the three others were also stable but had a shorter follow up. There was no rebleeding during the follow-up period.
Discussion
At present, endovascular treatment with coils is associated with a low morbi-mortality rate and prescribed for most intracranial ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysms 1,4,11,15-16. A randomized study comparing coiling to surgery in ruptured aneurysms demonstrated a better clinical outcome for the patients in the coiling arm 2,17-18.
Even though unruptured aneurysm management is still debated, various studies have shown that the endovascular approach results in a lower morbi-mortality rate than surgery 19-22. Nevertheless, coiling shows a higher recurrence and recanalization rate ranging from 4.5% to 33% in the literature 4-11.
The natural history of remnants in aneurysms is often benign 23, but the rebleeding rate is significantly higher for recurrent aneurysms than for stable aneurysms at angiographic follow-up 2,12,15.
Post-coiling recurrences raise the problem of retreatment which can potentially reduce the risk of a new recanalization 12. In our series, the retreatment was decided after a control angiogram showing either a major recurrence or an increase in the initial remnant aneurysm. To date, there are no objective criteria regarding the decision to retreat and Daugherty et al. 24 recently showed substantial variability among experienced operators to indicate an aneurysmal retreatment for patients with angiographic recurrence after coiling. However, most authors propose to retreat remnants or recurrent aneurysms when the angiographic control shows a worsening 1,7,15,25-26. Others have proposed, as the principal criteria, to retreat the recurrent aneurysms whose neck is not covered by coils greater than 2 mm 27. Retreatment is also recommended for those aneurysms responsible for mass effect and recurrent clinical symptoms 28. In general, symptom recurrence is associated with an angiographic recanalization.
Recently, Dorfer et al. 29 emphasized the importance of differentiating aneurysmal recurrence by compaction, whose treatment would be endovascular, and regrowth aneurysm, for which a surgical approach should be considered.
Our retreatment rate of 7.5% is comparable to the published results in the literature which range from 4.7% to 20.8% 4-5,8,12,15,16,25,27,30,31,33.
Although the follow-up period was evidently shorter in the second period, the retreatment rate significantly decreased in the second part of our experience from 10.9% (27 aneurysms) to 5.6% (22 aneurysms). The learning curve and adjunctive techniques like remodelling balloons may have improved the results of the initial coiling as reported in the series of Ries et al. and Raymond et al. 5,26.
The decision to retreat recurrences results from the comparison between the risk of conservative management and the risk of a new procedure. In our series, mortality was 0% and permanent morbidity was 1.8%. Except the series of Park et al. 34 reporting a morbidity of 10%, other series show a permanent complication rate of between 0% and 3% 7,10,12,25,27,33,35-37. We did not observe any periprocedural bleeding in our series and we found only one case reported by Ries et al. 27 in the literature. Some authors explain that the coils deployed in the aneurysm sac 12,33 and the delay between the initial haemorrhage and the new treatment play a major role in reducing the periprocedural bleedings.
Our periprocedural complication rate is low and even lower than the rates usually reported during the initial treatment of ruptured aneurysms 7,10,12,25,27,33,36-38. Our morbi-mortality also seems lower compared to the published results for asymptomatic aneurysms 22 – probably due to the fact we did not face periprocedural bleedings. It has to be noted that in our series 48% of the retreated aneurysms were large aneurysms and the procedures were deemed difficult. The technical difficulty of retreatment procedures has also been described in the clipping of previously coiled aneurysms. In their publication on 43 recurrent previously coiled aneurysms, Waldron et al. (38) reported 43% of large and giant aneurysms and a permanent mortality and morbidity of 7% and 2%, respectively.
Complications in the endovascular retreatment of aneurysms are mostly thromboembolic 7,10,12,25,27,33,36-37. In our study, thromboembolic complications were observed in the first part of our experience when the anticoagulation protocol only consisted of heparin. In the second part, no thromboembolic complication was noticed. Patients received aspirin and Clopidogrel. In the series of Park et al. 34, thromboembolic complications were the cause of the 10% procedural morbidity but patients had received only heparin as in the first part of our study. If antiplatelets have not been statistically proven to be efficient in the treatment of ruptured aneurysms 39, a double antiplatelet treatment may reduce the thromboembolic complications in the treatment of unruptured aneurysms 27,40 and may be recommended during endovascular retreatments when the perioperative risk of thromboembolic complications is high.
Our study has some limitations: it is a monocentric and retrospective study with a high percentage (16%) of loss to follow-up. In addition there was no core laboratory for anatomic results evaluation.
Conclusion
In our experience, the endovascular treatment of recurrent aneurysms has a low operating risk and allows a good occlusion of remnants in most cases. In our series, no bleeding was observed during the follow-up period. A longer follow-up on a larger scale is still necessary to confirm our conclusions.
Acknowledgments
We thank Barbara Pichon for excellent technical assistance.
References
- 1.Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, van der Graaf Y, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review. Stroke. 1999;30:470–476. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.2.470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1267–1274. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11314-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Beute GN, et al. Late rebleeding of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2542–2549. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cognard C, Weill A, Spelle L, et al. Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology. 1999;212:348–356. doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.2.r99jl47348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke. 2003;34:1398–1403. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pierot L, Delcourt C, Bouquigny F, et al. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:744–749. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Holmin S, Krings T, Ozanne A, et al. Intradural saccular aneurysms treated by Guglielmi detachable bare coils at a single institution between 1993 and 2005. Stroke. 2008;39:2288–2297. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.CARAT investigators Rates of delayed rebleeding from intracranial aneurysms are low after surgical and endovascular treatment. Stroke. 2006;37:1437–1442. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221331.01830.ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Redekop GJ. Microsurgical clipping or endovascular coiling for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Stroke. 2006;37:1352–1353. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221157.48691.8f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Stroke. 2007;38:1538–1544. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.466987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:959–966. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.0959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Slob MJ, Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, et al. Additional coiling of previously coiled cerebral aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results. Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1373–1376. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2001;32:1998–2004. doi: 10.1161/hs0901.095600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van Swieten J, Koudstaal P, Visser M, et al. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19:604–607. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.5.604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Byrne JV, Sohn MJ, Molyneux AJ, et al. Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:656–663. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.4.0656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gallas S, Pasco A, Cottier JP, et al. A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1723–1731. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Molyneux A, Kerr R, Yu L, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005;366:809–817. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Molyneux AJ, Kerra RSC, Birksb J, et al. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:427–433. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70080-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Johnston SC, Dudley RA, Gress DR, et al. Surgical and endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms at university hospitals. Neurology. 1999;52:1799–1805. doi: 10.1212/wnl.52.9.1799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Raaymakers T, Rinkel G, Limburg M, et al. Mortality and morbidity of surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 1998;29:1531–1538. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.8.1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee T, Baytion M, Sciacca R, et al. Aggregate analysis of the literature for unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1902–1908. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pierot L, Spelle L, Vitry F, et al. Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke. 2008;39:2497–2504. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hayakawa M, Murayama Y, Duckwiler GR, et al. Natural history of the neck remnant of a cerebral aneurysm treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil system. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:561–568. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.4.0561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Daugherty WP, Ehteshami Rad A, White JB, et al. Observer agreement regarding the necessity of previously coiled recurrent cerebral aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:566–569. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Renowden SA, Koumellis P, Benes V, et al. Retreatment of previously embolized cerebral aneurysms: the risk of further coil embolization does not negate the advantage of the initial embolization. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1401–1404. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gallas S, Januel AC, Pasco A, et al. Long-term follow-up of 1036 cerebral aneurysms treated by bare coils: a multicentric cohort treated between 1998 and 2003. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1986–1992. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ries T, Siemonsen S, Thomalla G, et al. Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1755–1761. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bhatti MT, Peters KR, Firment C, et al. Delayed exacerbation of third nerve palsy due to aneurysmal regrowth after endovascular coil embolization. J Neuroophthalmol. 2004;24:3–10. doi: 10.1097/00041327-200403000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dorfer C, Gruber A, Standhardt H, et al. Management of residual aneurysms after initial endovascular treatment. Neurosurgery. 2011 doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182350da5. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ferns SP, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, et al. Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke. 2009;40:523–529. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Willinsky RA, Peltz J, da Costa L, et al. Clinical and angiographic follow-up of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with embolisation. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1035–1040. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gunnarsson T, Tong FC, Klurfan P, et al. Angiographic and clinical outcomes in 200 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysm treated with hydrogel-coated coils. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1657–1664. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Henkes H, Fischer S, Liebig T, et al. Repeated endovascular coil occlusion in 350 of 2759 intracranial aneurysms: safety and effectiveness aspects. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:224–232. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000194831.54183.3F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Park HK, Horowitz M, Jungreis C, et al. Periprocedural morbidity and mortality associated with endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:506–514. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Finitsis S, Anxionnat R, Lebedinsky A, et al. Endovascular treatment of ACom Intracranial Aneurysms Report series of 280 patients. Interventional Neuroradiology. 2009;16:7–17. doi: 10.1177/159101991001600101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gonzales NR, Dusick JR, Duckwiler G, et al. Endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients: report of 205 treated aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:714–721. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000367451.59090.D7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Van Rooij WJ, Sprengers ME, Sluzewski M, et al. Intracranial aneurysms that repeatedly reopen over time after coiling: imaging characteristics and treatment outcome. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:343–349. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0200-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Waldron J, Halbach V, Lawton M. Results of microsurgical management of incompletely coiled and recurrent aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:301–307. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000335178.15274.B4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dorhout Mees SM, van den Bergh WM, Algra A, et al. Antiplatelet therapy in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2008;32:2186–2187. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000083621.44269.3E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hwang G, Jung C, Park SQ, et al. Thromboembolic complications of elective coil embolization of unruptured aneurysms: the effect of oral antiplatelet preparation on periprocedural thromboembolic complication. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:743–748. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000374770.09140.FB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]