Abstract
Recently our group has demonstrated that cellular triglycerides (TG) levels play an important role in rotavirus replication. In this study, we further examined the roles of the key enzymes for TG synthesis (lipogenesis) in the replication of rotaviruses by using inhibitors of fatty acid synthase, long chain fatty acid acyl-CoA synthetase (ACSL), and diacylglycerol acyltransferase and acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase in association with lipid droplets of which TG is a major component. Triacsin C, a natural ACSL inhibitor from Streptomyces aureofaciens, was found to be highly effective against rotavirus replication. Thus, novel triacsin C analogs were synthesized and evaluated for their efficacies against the replication of rotaviruses in cells. Many of the analogs significantly reduced rotavirus replication, and one analog (1e) was highly effective at a nanomolar concentration range (ED50 0.1 μM) with a high therapeutic index in cell culture. Our results suggest a crucial role of lipid metabolism in rotavirus replication, and triacsin C and/or its analogs as potential therapeutic options for rotavirus infections.
Keywords: rotavirus, antivirals, triacsin C analogs, lipogenesis
1. Introduction
Rotaviruses are non-enveloped, icosahedral viruses with an 11-segment double-stranded RNA genome [1]. The capsid of rotavirus is composed of the outer capsid proteins, VP4 and VP7, and the major inner capsid protein, VP6. Rotaviruses are divided into 7 (A to G) antigenically distinct serogroups based on VP6. Among them, group A rotaviruses are the leading cause of severe gastroenteritis in infant and children worldwide, associated with over 500,000 death in children younger than 5 years of age each year, although attenuated live vaccines are available [1-3]. Majority of rotavirus infection-associated mortality occurs in the developing countries. Nonetheless, nearly 1 in 80 children is hospitalized with rotavirus gastroenteritis by 5 years of age in the US [1-3]. Since there are no specific antiviral agent for rotavirus infection, the treatment options for rotavirus infection are limited to providing oral rehydration solution to restore and maintain hydration until the infection resolves [4]. However, the development of rotavirus antivirals to reduce the severity of diseases and duration of rotavirus-related hospitalization has been impeded by limited information on the therapeutic targets for rotaviruses.
Previously it was shown that disruption of lipid rafts and/or lipid droplets decrease infectious rotaviruses by inhibition of rotavirus morphogenesis [5, 6]. Lipid droplets are cellular organelles for storage of neutral fats such as TG and cholesterol ester, and play a crucial role in regulating cellular lipid levels. Lipid rafts are microdomains in cell membrane enriched in cholesterol, glycosphingolipids, and proteins. These structures are found important for infectious virus particle formation of human hepatitis C virus (HCV) [7, 8] and dengue virus [9], suggesting the importance of lipid homeostasis in virus replication. Recently our group has demonstrated that rotavirus replication induced an increase in the TG levels in cells, and suppression of increase in TG levels by farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists significantly inhibited rotavirus replication [10].
Lipogenesis is the process of producing fats from acetyl-CoA, which is then stored as an energy source. During lipogenesis, fatty acid (FA) is synthesized (de novo synthesis) from acetyl-CoA, and subsequently esterified with glycerol to form TG. Numerous enzymes participate in lipogenesis, which include fatty acid synthase (FASN), long chain fatty acid acyl-CoA synthetase (ACSL) 1-6, and diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) 1/2 and Acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT)1/2 [11-15]. Lipolysis is the reverse pathway of lipogenesis to generate acetyl-CoA and energy from TG in which process multiple enzymes including lipases are involved. In this study, we found that the commercially available inhibitors for FASN, ACSL, DGAT and ACAT significantly reduced the replication of rotaviruses in vitro. Since triacsin C, a fungal metabolite from Streptomyces aureofaciens, is an ACSL inhibitor and showed the most potent inhibition on rotavirus replication, we synthesized its analogs and examined their antiviral effects against rotavirus. The synthetic sequence is straightforward and efficient (Scheme 1 and 2), which would provide flexibility for further optimization. Among the triacsin C and its analogs, 1e is the most potent against rotavirus replication with the effective dose that reduce 50% of the virus replication (ED50) of 0.1 μM. Our results suggest that lipogenic enzymes may represent potential therapeutic targets for rotavirus infection, and triacsin C analogs may be useful as therapeutic options for rotavirus infection.
Scheme 1.
Preparation of 2,4,7-undeca-trienal (1)
Scheme 2.
Syntheses of Triacsin C Analogs
2. Biochemical studies
The effects of commercially available inhibitors for lipogenesis as well as newly synthesized triacsin C analogs (described below) were examined in rotavirus replication using SA11 strain in MA104 cells. Various chemical inhibitors including FASN inhibitors (cerulenin and C75), ACSL inhibitors (triacsin C and troglitazone), DGAT inhibitors (A922500 and betulinic acid), and ACAT inhibitors (CI-976, hexadecylamino-p-amino benzoic acid [PHB]) (Figure 1) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA).
Figure 1.
Structures of inhibitors specific for FASN, ACSL, DGAT and ACAT.
3. Chemistry
Various triascin C analogs were synthesized from (E,E,E)-2,4,7-undecatrienal (1), which was prepared by a modification of the reported procedure [16, 17] (Scheme 1). Hence, bromination of (E)-2-hexen-1-ol (2) with phosphorus tribromide in dichloromethane followed by a displacement reaction with 3-(tetrahydropyranyloxy)propynyl magnesium bromide and a catalytic amount of copper cyanide afforded enyne 3. Removal of the THP protecting group of 3 with oxalic acid in refluxing methanol followed by selective reduction of the propagylic alcohol function with lithium aluminum hydride in diethyl ether gave (E,E)-2,5-nonadien-1-ol (4). Oxidation of the hydroxyl function of 4 with o-iodoxybenzoic acid (IBX) in DMSO provided aldehyde 5. A two-carbon extension utilizing the Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons protocol was carried out by the treatment of aldehyde 5 with triethyl phosphonacetate and sodium hydride in benzene furnished all-trans ester 6 in 57% yield. When THF was used as solvent, under similar reaction conditions only (E,E,E)-2,4,6-undecatrienoate (31% yield) was isolated, and 6 was not found. Reduction of ester 6 with lithium aluminum hydride followed by oxidation with IBX and DMSO afforded trienal 1 in 82% overall yield (from ester 6).
Triacsin C analogs including hydrazone derivatives 1a – 1c and 1ba, cyano analog 1d, and aminobenzoic acid 1e were synthesized for bio-evaluation. Hydrazone formation of 1 with chloromethanesulfonohydrazide, 3-chloropropane-1-sulfonohydrazide, and propane-2-sulfonohydrazide separately in ethanol at room temperature gave hydrazones 1a, 1b, and 1c, respectively, in good to excellent yields (Scheme 2). Intramolecular cyclization of 1b with sodium hydride in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at 25°C gave 1ba. It should be noted the aforementioned hydrazones are stable under silica gel column chromatographic conditions. Cyano compound 1d was obtained from a Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons olefination of aldehyde 1 with diethyl cyanomethylphosphonate and sodium hydride [18]. Reductive amination of aldehyde 1 with 4-aminobenzoic acid in methanol followed by sodium cyanoborohydride produced 1e. Chloromethanesulfonohydrazide, 3-chloropropane-1-sulfonohydrazide, and propane-2-sulfonohydrazide were prepared by the treatment of chloromethanesulfonyl chloride, 3-chloropropane-1-sulfonyl chloride, and propane-2-sulfonyl chloride, respectively, with 40% hydrazine (in aqueous solution) in THF at 25°C for 2 hrs. After aqueous workup, extraction with diethyl ether, and concentration, the crude hydrazine intermediates were used in subsequent steps without purification. It should be noted that the synthesis of triacsin C from aldehyde 1 has been reported by Tanaka et al. [17] in less than 0.5% yield from a three-step sequence of reactions. 1e not only has a greater bioactivity than triacsin C, its chemical yield is 44% prepared from aldehyde 1 in one step.
4. Results and discussion
All inhibitors, cerulenin, C75, triacsin C, troglitazone, A922500, betulinic acid, CI-976 and PHB, significantly reduced the replication of SA11 rotavirus in cells with ED50 values of 0.2 - 28.5 μM (Table 1). The ED50 values of cerulenin, C75, A922500, betulinic acid and PHB were similar at 11.3 – 28.5 μM, while troglitazone and CI-976 had lower ED50 values of 5.8 μM and 4.3 μM, respectively (Table 1). The TD50 of the inhibitors in MA104 cells varied at 8.5 – 85.4 μM (Table 1). Among the tested commercial inhibitors, triacsin C was the most effective against rotavirus replication with ED50 of 0.2 μM. The in vitro therapeutic index of triacsin C was 248. Similar ED50 values of the inhibitors were observed against Wa rotavirus strain, and SA11 strain was used for further studies. These results indicate that disruption of lipogenesis induced by rotavirus replication at any step significantly inhibited the virus replication.
Table 1.
The effects of the inhibitors of lipogenic enzymes and triacsin C analogs in the
Class | Rotavirus (SA11) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Inhibitors | ED50 (μM)a | TD50(μM) | |
FASN | Cerulenin | 28.5 | 56.7 |
C75 | 21.2 | 28.5 | |
ACSL | Triacsin C | 0.2 | 49.6 |
Troglitazone | 5.8 | 18.5 | |
DGAT | A922500 | 23.2 | 85.4 |
Betulinic acid | 22.5 | 27.8 | |
ACAT | CI-976 | 4.3 | 8.5 |
PHB | 11.3 | 75.5 | |
Triacsin C | 1a | 8.7 | 74.0 |
analogs | 1b | 11.5 | 86.3 |
1c | 9.8 | 90.2 | |
1d | 21.3 | 78.8 | |
| |||
1ba | 2.2 | 86.4 | |
1e | 0.1 | 28.5 |
replication of rotavirus
Each ED50 and TD50 value was the averge of at least 3 independent tests.
Triacsin C is an analog of polyunsaturated FA, having an 11-carbon alkenyl chain with a N-hydroxytriazene moiety at the terminus, and competitively inhibits ACSL 1, 3, and 4 [21]. ACSL is a family of enzymes that converts long chain FA to acyl-CoA, which serves as a substrate at each cascading step in the synthesis of various lipid molecules including TG and cholesteryl ester. In mammals, five isoforms of ACSLs are identified (ACSL 1, 3-6) [12]. In lipid droplet-enriched fractions from Huh7 cells, ACSL 3 is the most abundant isoform and ACSL 4 is a minor constituent [19]. The role of ACSL3 seems to be important in the synthesis of neutral lipids in lipid droplets, suggested by the finding that the addition of oleic acid as a source of FA in the cells led to the accumulation of lipid droplets in association with increased levels of ACSL 3 in lipid droplets [20].
By inhibiting ACSL, triacsin C consequently blocks the synthesis of TG, diglycerides, and cholesterol esters [22]. Troglitazone, a member of the thiazolidinediones family, is an anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory drug. It is also known to inhibit ACSL4 (but not other ACSL isoforms), and decreased the size of lipid droplets in cells [23]. In our study, both triacsin C and troglitazone significantly reduced the replication of rotavirus. Furthermore, addition of triacsin C directly to the medium of cell culture showed potent antivirus effects against rotavirus replication, suggesting that triacsin C readily penetrates the cells.
Since triacsin C strongly inhibited rotavirus replication, we synthesized various analogs of triacsin C, and examined their effects in rotavirus replication and toxicity in MA104 cells. The effective synthetic analogs against rotaviruses are shown in Table 1 with ED50 and TD50 values, and therapeutic indexes. The analogs have a conserved 11-carbon chain with various functionalities at the alkylidene-terminal replacing 1,2,3-triazene of triacsin C. The presence of various sulfonylhydrazones and cyano functions (1a-1ba) at the alkylidene-terminal end decreased the antiviral effects compared to triazene moiety. However, 1e that contains aminobenzoic acid at the alkylidene-terminal end is highly effective in antiviral effects against rotavirus replication with lower ED50 (0.1 μM) and higher in vitro therapeutic index (285), compared to those of triacsin C. Anti-rotaviral effects of triacsin C, 1ba, and 1e were also confirmed with Western blot analysis and IFA (Figure 2). The pre-treatment of SA11 rotavirus with triacsin C (100 M) or 1e (100 M) did not affect the viral titer, indicating that the antiviral effects of triacsin C and 1e are not the result of direct viral neutralization or virucidal effect on rotavirus. The suppression of increase in lipid droplets by triacsin C, 1ba and 1e was dose-dependent in Huh-7 cells and was positively correlated (r2 = .89 and .87 for 1ba and 1e, respectively) with reduction of rotavirus replication in MA104 cells (Figure 3). The results suggest that the inhibition of virus replication by these compounds is associated with the suppression of lipid accumulation in the cells triggered by viral infection.
Figure 2.
The effects of triacsin C, and its analogs in rotavirus (SA11) replication determined by Western blot analysis (A) and IFA (B). SA11 rotavirus was inoculated to the cells at a MOI of 2, and cells were incubated with or without each inhibitor (triacsin C, 1e or 1ba). Cell lysates were collected at 12 hr post infection (A) and virus infected cells were fixed at 12 hr post infection (B) at the indicated concentrations.
Figure 3.
Lipid droplets monitored with NDB-cholesterol in rotavirus (SA11) infected MA104 cells (A) or uninfected Huh-7 cells (B). A. Lipid droplets in MA104 cells infected with SA11 rotavirus with a MOI of 10. Panels, a and b: cells incubated with mock-medium (a) or SA11 rotavirus (b) for 10 hr. Panels, c and d: SA11 rotavirus infected cells incubated in the presence of triacsin C (1 μM) (c) or 1e (1 μM) (d) for 10 hr. B. The development of lipid droplets in Huh-7 cells incubated with mock-medium, triacsin C, or 1e. Panel a: 1 day old cells; b: 4 day old cells; c and d: 4 day old cells incubated in the presence of triacsin C (1 μM)(c) or 1e (1 μM)(d).
In this study, we demonstrated that rotavirus replication is closely associated with lipid metabolism, and inhibition of lipogenic enzymes significantly decreased rotavirus replication. We have also synthesized novel triacsin C analogs by modification of the alkylidene-terminal end for evaluation of anti-rotavirus activity, and found one of the novel analogs, 1e, was highly effective against rotavirus replication. The facile and high-yielding synthesis of the analogs would provide flexibility for further optimization. Based on these findings, the lipogenic enzymes may serve as potential therapeutic targets for rotavirus infection and triacsin C analogs as potential therapeutic options for rotavirus infections.
5. Experimental
5.1 General
NMR spectra were obtained from a 400-MHz spectrometer (Varian Inc.), in CDCl3, unless otherwise indicated, and reported in ppm. Mass spectra were taken from an API 2000-triple quadrupole ESI-MS/MS mass spectrometer (from Applied Biosystems). Chemicals and solvents including Chloromethanesulfonyl chloride, 3-chloropropane-1-sulfonyl chloride, and propane-2-sulfonyl chloride were purchased from Fisher Scientific and Aldrich Chemical Co. A modification of the reported procedure [16, 17] was used to prepare (E,E,E)-2,4,7-undecatrienal (1), and spectral data of all synthetic intermediates including 13C NMR data (which were not reported in previous publications [16, 17]) are included herein.
5.2. Representative synthesis
5.2.1 (E)-1-(2-tetrahydropyranyl)oxy-nona-5-en-2-yne (3)
To a solution of 10.0 g (0.1 mol) of E-2-hexen-1-ol (2) in 100 mL of dichloromethane at -10°C under argon, was added 13.5 g (0.05 mol) of PBr. After stirring at 25° 3 C for 3 h, the reaction solution was washed with a saturated aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (50 mL), water, and brine, dried (MgSO4), concentrated to give 14.5 g (89% yield) of E-1-bromo-2-hexene, which was used in the following step without purification. 1H NMR δ 5.8 – 5.65 (m, 2 H, =CH), 3.96 (d, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 2.05 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.41 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.91 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR δ 136.7, 126.7, 34.3, 33.9, 22.2, 13.8; MS (electrospray) m/z 165.1 and 163.1 (M+H+; 100%; bromine isotopes).
To a solution of 15 g (0.18 mol) of dihydropyrane and 2 mg of p-toluenesulfonic acid was added 10 g (0.18 mol) of 2-propyn-1-ol. After stirring at 25°C for 3 h, the reaction solution was diluted with 100 mL of diethyl ether and washed with 10% aqueous NaHCO3, water, and brine, dried (MgSO4), concentrated to give 20.5 g (82% yield) of 2-(2-propynyloxy)-tetrahydropyrane. 1H NMR δ 4.83 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H, CHO), 4.29 (dd, J = 16, 3 Hz, 1 H, CH2O), 4.26 (dd, J = 16, 3 Hz, 1 H, CH2O), 3.88 – 3.82 (m, 1 H, CHO), 3.58 – 3.52 (m, 1 H, CHO), 2.42 (d, J = 3 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 1.90 – 1.50 (m, 6 H); 13C NMR δ 97.0, 79.9, 74.2, 62.1, 54.1, 30.4, 25.5, 19.1; MS (electrospray; negative mode) m/z 139.0 (M-H−, 100%). MS (electrospray; positive mode) m/z 163.1 (M+Na+; 100%).
To a solution of 18 mL (18 mmol) of 1 M ethylmagnesium bromide in THF under argon at 0°C, were added 1.7 g (12 mmol) of 2-(2-propynyloxy)-tetrahydropyrane and 4 mg of CuCN. After stirring for 0.5 h, 2.0 g (12 mmol) of E-1-bromo-2-hexene was added, and the resulting solution was stirred at 25°C for 0.5 hr, neutralized with 0.1 N HCl, and extracted with diethyl ether three times. The combined ether extract was washed with water and brine, dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and column chromatographed on silica gel using a mixture of hexane and diethyl ether (20:1) to give 2.0 g (75% yield) of compound 3: 1H NMR δ 5.66 (dt, J = 16, 7 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 5.40 (dt, J = 16, 5.6 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 4.83 (t, J = 3 Hz, 1 H, CHO), 4.33 (dt, J = 16, 2.4 Hz, 1 H, CH2O), 4.24 (dd, J = 16, 2.4 Hz, 1 H, CH2O), 3.89 – 3.82 (m, 1 H, CHO), 3.57 – 3.51 (m, 1 H, CHO), 2.95 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.00 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.90 – 1.50 (m, 6 H), 1.39 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.90 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR δ 132.5, 124.1, 96.9, 84.4, 77.6, 62.2, 54.9, 34.6, 30.5, 25.6, 22.6, 22.3, 19.3, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 245.2 (M+Na+; 100%).
5.2.2 (E,E)-2,5-Nanodien-1-ol (4)
A solution of 7.2 g (32 mmol) of compound 3 in 60 mL of 2% oxalic acid in methanol was heated under reflux for 2 hrs, and most of the methanol was removed under a rotary evaporator. The residue was diluted with diethyl ether (100 mL), washed with water and brine, dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and column chromatographed on silica gel using a gradient mixture of hexane and diethyl ether as eluant to give 3.94 g (88% yield) of E-5-nonen-2-yn-1-ol. 1H NMR δ 5.67 (dt, J = 16, 7 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 5.39 (dt, J = 16, 5.6 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 4.29 (dt, J = 6, 2 Hz, 2 H, CH2O), 2.96 (d, J = 2 Hz, 2 H), 2.00 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.39 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.90 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR δ 132.6, 123.9, 84.4, 80.0, 51.7, 34.6, 22.6, 22.2, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 161.1 (M+Na+; 100%).
To a solution of 5.5 g (40 mmol) of E-5-nonen-2-yn-1-ol in 50 mL of diethyl ether under argon was added 1.5 g (39 mmol) of LiAlH4 in portions. After stirring at 25°C for 24 h, the reaction mixture was quenched with 50 mL of 1 N NaOH, and extracted with diethyl ether three times (50 mL each). The combined ether extracts were washed with water and brine, dried (MgSO4), concentrated to give 5.0 g (90% yield) of compound 4, which was used in the next step without further purification. 1H NMR δ 5.75 – 5.6 (m, 2 H, =CH), 5.50 – 5.35 (m, 2 H, =CH), 4.12 (t, J = 4 Hz, 2 H, CH2O), 2.75 (t, J = 5 Hz, 2 H), 1.99 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.38 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.89 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR δ 131.9 (2 C), 129.6, 127.8, 63.9, 35.4, 34.9, 22.8, 22.2, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 163.1 (M+Na+; 100%).
5.2.3. (E,E)-2,5-Nonadienal (5)
To a solution of 5.0 g (36 mmol) of compound 4 in 13 mL of DMSO under argon at 25°C was added 12.5 g (45 mmol) of o-iodoxybenzoic acid (IBX), and the solution was stirred for 4 h, diluted with diethyl ether (100 mL), and washed with water twice (50 mL each). The aqueous layers were extracted with diethyl ether, and the combined ether layers were washed with brine, dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and column chromatographed on silica gel using hexane and diethyl ether (20:1) as eluant to give 3.45 g (70% yield) of aldehyde 5. 1H NMR δ 9.53 (d, J = 7 Hz, 1 H, CHO), 6.85 (dt, J = 16, 7 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 6.13 (dd, J = 16, 8 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 5.55 (dt, J = 15, 5 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 5.43 (dt, J = 15, 5 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 3.03 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 2.01 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.39 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.91 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR δ 194.2, 157.3, 134.4, 133.2, 124.6, 35.8, 34.8, 22.6, 13.8; MS (electrospray) m/z 161.2 (M+Na+; 100%).
5.2.4. Ethyl (E,E,E)-2,4,7-Undecatrienoate (6)
To a mixture of 0.35 g (8.7 mmol) of sodium hydride (60% in oil; pre-washed with diethyl ether twice to remove mineral oil) in 20 mL of benzene under argon was added 1.95 g (8.7 mmol) of triethyl phosphonacetate, and the solution was stirred at 25°C for 2 hrs. To it, a solution of 1.0 g (7.2 mmol) of compound 5 in 2 mL of benzene was added via cannula under argon. After stirring for 0.5 hr, the reaction solution was neutralized with 0.1 N HCl, and extracted twice with diethyl ether. The combined extract was washed with water and brine, dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and column chromatographed on silica gel using hexane and diethyl ether (30:1) as eluant to give 0.64 g (57% yield based on recovered starting material) of compound 6 and 0.25 g (25% recovery) of compound aldehyde 5. 1H NMR δ 7.27 (dd, J = 16, 10 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 6.22 – 6.09 (m, 2 H, =CH), 5.80 (d, J = 16 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 5.52 – 5.37 (m, 2 H, =CH), 4.20 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 2.86 (t, J = 6 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 1.99 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.39 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.30 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR δ 167.5, 145.0, 142.8, 132.9, 128.8, 126.5, 119.8, 60.4, 36.1, 34.9, 22.7, 14.5, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 231.0 and 163.1 (M+Na+; 100%), 209.2 (M+H+).
5.2.5. (E,E,E)-2,4,7-Undecatrienal (1)
To a solution of 0.63 g (3.0 mmol) of compound 6 in 20 mL of diethyl ether under argon at 0°C was added 0.12 g (3.0 mmol) of LiAlH4, and the solution was stirred for 1 hr, diluted with water carefully, and extracted with diethyl ether twice. The combined extracts were washed with water and brine, dried (MgSO4), and concentrated to give 0.43 g (85% yield) of (E,E,E)-2,4,7-undecan-1-ol. 1H NMR δ 6.23 (dd, J = 15, 11 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 6.05 (dd, J = 15, 11 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 5.78 – 5.67 (m, 2 H, =CH), 5.47 – 5.37 (m, 2 H, =CH), 4.16 (q, J = 6 Hz, 2 H, CHO), 2.78 (t, J = 6 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 1.98 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.37 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.89 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR δ 134.1 (2 C), 132.1, 130.1 (2 C), 129.9, 127.7, 63.7, 35.8, 34.9, 22.8, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 205.1 (M+K+; 100%), 189.1 (M+Na+).
To a solution of 0.43 g (2.6 mmol) of (E,E,E)-2,4,7-undecan-1-ol in 3 mL of DMSO under argo was added 0.91 g (3.3 mmol) of IBX, and the solution was stirred at 25°C for 4 h, diluted with dichloromethane (50 mL), and washed with water (50 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with dichloromethane, and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (20 mL), dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and column chromatographed on silica gel using hexane and diethyl ether (20:1) as eluant to give 0.41 g (96% yield) of aldehyde 1. 1H NMR δ 9.55 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1 H, CHO), 7.10 (dd, J = 15, 9 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 6.37 – 6.24 (m, 2 H, =CH), 6.10 (dd, J = 15, 7.6 Hz, 1 H, =CH), 5.55 – 5.38 (m, 2 H, =CH), 2.91 (t, J = 9.6 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 2.01 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.40 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.91 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR δ 194.1, 152.8, 145.4, 133.4, 130.6, 129.0, 126.0, 36.3, 34.9, 22.7, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 187.1 (M+Na+, 100%).
5.2.6. (E)-chloro-N’-((2E,4E,7E)-undeca-2,4,7-trienylidene)methanesulfonohydrazide (1a)
A solution of 20 mg (0.12 mmol) of (E,E,E)-2,4,7-undecatrienal (1) and 35 mg (0.24 mmol) of chloromethanesulfonohydrazide in 1 mL of ethanol was stirred under argon at 25°C for 2 hrs, and ethanol was removed under a rotary evaporator. The residue was diluted with 20 mL of diethyl ether, washed with water (15 mL) three times, and brine (15 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and column chromatographed on silica gel using a 1:1 mixture of hexane and diethyl ether as eluent to give 35 mg (100% yield) of 1a: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.91 (s, 1 H, NH), 7.55 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1 H, N=CH), 6.56 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1 H), 6.27 – 6.15 (m, 2 H), 5.97 (dt, J = 12, 7 Hz, 1 H), 5.47 – 5.38 (m, 2 H), 4.70 (s, 2 H, CH2Cl), 2.85 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.99 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.39 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.90 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 152.0, 142.3, 140.0, 132.8, 129.7, 126.7, 125.3, 53.0, 36.1, 34.9, 22.7, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 313.0 (M+Na+; 100%).
5.2.7.(E)-3-chloro-N’-((2E,4E,7E)-undeca-2,4,7-trienylidene)propane-1-sulfonohydrazide (1b)
A similar procedure to that described above was followed. From 20 mg (0.12 mmol) of aldehyde 1 and 42 mg (0.24 mmol) of 40% hydrazine, 38 mg (98% yield) of 1b was obtained after column chromatographic purification. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.08 (s, 1 H, NH), 7.49 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1 H, N=CH), 6.52 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1 H), 6.27 – 6.14 (m, 2 H), 5.94 (dt, J = 12, 7 Hz, 1 H), 5.49 – 5.38 (m, 2 H), 3.68 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2 H, CH2Cl), 3.43 (dd, J = 7, 3 Hz, 2 H, CH2S), 2.84 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 2.31 (pentet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.99 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.37 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.89 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 150.4, 141.3, 139.2, 132.7, 129.8, 126.9, 125.7, 48.8, 42.8, 36.0, 34.9, 26.7, 22.7, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 341.0 (M+Na+; 100%).
5.2.8. (E)-N’-[(2E,4E,7E)-Undeca-2,4,7-trienylidene]propane-2-sulfonohydrazide (1c)
Following a similar reaction sequence as that described for 1a, from 25 mg (0.15 mmol) of aldehyde 1 and 42 mg (0.31 mmol) of propane-2-sulfonohydrazide, gave 32 mg (74% yield) of 1c. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.90 (s, 1 H, NH), 7.48 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1 H, N=CH), 6.50 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1 H), 6.24 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1 H), 6.16 (dd, J = 14, 10 Hz, 1 H), 5.92 (dt, J = 15, 7 Hz, 1 H), 5.46 – 5.37 (m, 2 H), 3.53 (heptet, J = 7 Hz, 1 H, CH), 2.83 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.99 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.41 (d, J = 7 Hz, 6 H), 1.38 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.89 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 149.4, 140.6, 138.8, 132.6, 129.9, 126.9, 126.0, 52.4, 36.0, 34.9, 22.7, 16.4, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 307.1 (M+Na+; 100%).
5.2.9. (2E,4E,6E,9E)-Trideca-2,4,6,9-tetraenenitrile (1d)
To a mixture of 15 mg (0.36 mmol) of sodium hydride (washed twice with distilled anhydrous diethyl ether) in 1 mL of benzene under argon was added 64 mg (0.36 mmol) of diethyl cyanomethylphosphonate, and the solution was stirred at 25°C for 2 hrs. To it, a solution of 40 mg (0.24 mmol) of aldehyde 1 in 1 mL of benzene was added via syringe. The resulting solution was stirred for 1 hour, diluted with water (10 mL), neutralized with 0.1 N HCl solution, and extracted with diethyl ether three times (20 mL each). The combined extract was washed with brine, dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and column chromatographed on silica gel using a 30:1 mixture of hexane and diethyl ether as eluant to give 26 mg (58% yield) of 1d. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.00 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1 H), 6.52 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1 H), 6.22 – 6.05 (m, 2 H), 6.00 (dt, J = 15, 7 Hz, 1 H), 5.46 – 5.38 (m, 2 H), 5.28 (d, J = 15 Hz, 1 H), 2.86 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.99 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.39 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.90 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 150.6, 142.0, 140.7, 132.8, 129.7, 127.5, 126.7, 195.0, 97.2, 36.1, 34.9, 22.7, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 210.1 (M+Na+; 100%).
5.2.10. 2-[(2E,4E,7E)-Undeca-2,4,7-trienylideneamino]-1,1-dioxo-1-isothiazolidine (1ba)
A solution of 15 mg (47 μmol) of 1b and 2.0 mg (50 μmol) of sodium hydride in 0.5 mL of DMF (distilled) under argon was stirred at 25°C for 3 days. The resulting solution was neutralized with diluted aqueous HCl solution, and extracted with diethyl ether twice (25 mL each). The combined extract was washed with water three times (20 mL each), and brine (20 mL), dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and column chromatographed on silica gel using a 1:1 mixture of hexane and diethyl ether as eluant to give 6 mg (46% yield) of 1ba. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.54 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1 H, N=CH), 6.54 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1 H), 6.32 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1 H), 6.18 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1 H), 5.91 (dt, J = 15, 7 Hz, 1 H), 5.46 – 5.40 (m, 2 H), 3.59 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 3.22 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 2.84 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 2.49 (pentet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.99 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.38 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.89 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 151.5, 140.8, 138.6 (2 C), 132.6, 130.1, 126.8, 46.3, 45.3, 36.1, 34.9, 30.6, 22.8, 18.0, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 305.2 (M+Na+; 100%).
5.2.11. 4-((2E,4E,7E)-Undeca-2,4,7-trienylamino)benzoic acid (1e)
A solution of 30 mg (0.18 mmol) of aldehyde 1 and 24 mg (0.18 mmol) of 4-aminobenzoic acid in 5 mL of methanol was stirred under argon at 25°C for 1 hr. To it, 10 μL of acetic acid and 30 mg (0.48 mmol) of sodium cyanoborohydride were added sequentially. After stirring at 25°C for 12 hrs, the reaction solution was diluted with aqueous ammonium chloride, and extracted with diethyl ether twice (25 mL each). The combined extract was washed with brine, dried (MgSO4), concentrated and column chromatographed on silica gel using a gradient mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate as eluant to give 23 mg (44% yield) of 1e. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.93 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H, Ar), 6.58 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2 H, Ar), 6.25 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1 H), 6.06 (dd, J = 15, 10 Hz, 1 H), 5.75 – 5.64 (m, 2 H), 5.45 – 5.40 (m, 2 H), 3.86 (d, J = 7 Hz, 2 H, CH2H), 2.78 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.98 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 1.38 (sextet, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 0.90 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 171.8, 152.6, 134.0, 132.9, 132.5, 132.1, 129.7, 127.6, 127.1, 117.6, 111.9, 45.3, 35.8, 34.9, 22.8, 13.9; MS (electrospray) m/z 308.1 (M+Na+; 100%).
6. Biochemical studies
6.1. Cells, antisera and reagents
The MA104 cell line was maintained in minimum essential medium (MEM) containing 5% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin). Antibodies specific to rotavirus VP6 or β-actin were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. Rotavirus strains including Wa (human G1) and SA11 (primate G3) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA).
6.2. Nonspecific cytotoxic effects
Confluent MA104 grown in 24-well plates were treated with various concentrations of each compound for 24 hrs. Cell cytotoxicity was measured by a CytoTox 96® non-radioactive cytotoxicity assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI), and TD50 value of each compound was determined using the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon [24].
6.3. Rotavirus infection and treatments in cell culture
Fully confluent monolayered MA104 cells grown in 6- or 12-well plates were inoculated with Wa or SA11 rotavirus at high (2) or low (0.01) multiplicity of infection (MOI) for 1 hr. Following washing step with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), MEM containing each compound or DMSO (0.1%) was added to each well. In addition, trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich) was included at 1 μg/ml in medium for rotavirus replication. The concentrations of each compound in the cells were less than 50 μM for cerulenin, C75, triacsin C, various triacsin C analogs, A922500 and PHB, and less than 20 μM for betulinic acid, and CI-976. As a control, nitazoxanide was used at 0.5 to 5 M. Virus replication was monitored at 12, 24 and 48 hr post infection by immunofluorescent assay (IFA) or Western blot analysis with antibody against VP6, and the 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50)/ml was also determined. The ED50 was calculated based on TCID50 titers at 24 hr post infection (with 0.05 MOI) for each compound using the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon [24].
6.4. Pre-treatment of viruses with triacsin C or 1e
To investigate if triacsin C or its analog 1e has virucidal effects on rotavirus, SA11 rotavirus of high titer (> 109 TCID50/ml) was pre-incubated with PBS (or DMSO), triacsin C (200 M) or 1e (200 M) at 37 °C for 2 hrs. Then the mixture was diluted up to 100 times for cell inoculation. Virus infected cells were incubated with medium containing trypsin for up to 24 or 48 hrs, and the virus replication was monitored by the titration of progeny viruses using the TCID50 method.
6.5. Determination of viral replication using IFA, Western blot analysis and TCID50 method
Virus replication in cell culture was assessed by the IFA or Western blot analysis at 12 or 24 hr post infection before the extensive cytopathic effects (CPE) are induced by viral infection. Viral replication was also titrated with the TCID50 method at 24 and 48 hr post infection after cells were lysed with repeated freezing and thawing. IFA: cells were fixed with 100% methanol at room temperature for 30 min. Then, monoclonal antibody specific for rotavirus VP6 was applied to the cells followed by goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). The stained cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope. Western blot analysis: The expression levels of VP6 in the presence of each compound were also assessed by Western blot analysis. The cells were lysed at 12 hr post infection, and the cell lysates were prepared in SDS-PAGE sample buffer containing 1% β-mercaptoethanol, and sonicated for 20 sec. The proteins were resolved in a 10% Novex Tris-Bis gel (Invitrogen) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were probed with monoclonal antibody specific for rotavirus VP6, and the binding of the antibodies was detected with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. In addition, separate membranes were probed with antiserum specific for β-actin, and appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were used. Following incubation with a chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL), signals were detected on X-ray film. TCID50 method: A standard TCID50 method with the 10-fold dilution of each sample was used for virus titration in MA104 cells according to the Reed and Muench method [25].
6.6. Lipid staining of cells in the absence or presence of rotavirus infection
Confluent MA104 cells in 96-well plates were infected with mock-medium or SA11 rotavirus at a MOI of 10. Virus infected cells were treated with various concentrations of mock (DMSO, 0.1%), cerulenin, C75, triacsin C, 1e, A922500, betulinic acid, CI-976 or PHB, and incubated with medium with NBD-cholesterol (1 μg/ml) and trypsin (1 μg/ml). NBD-cholesterol rapidly distributes in the cells and targets lipid droplets by binding specifically to lipid droplet-specific protein with high affinity [26]. At 10 hr after virus infection, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 10 min, followed by washing with PBS twice. Then the fluorescence signals from NBD-cholesterol in the cells were observed under a fluorescent microscope.
In human liver carcinoma Huh-7 cells, lipid droplets develop spontaneously in cell culture [27]. In separate experiments, confluent Huh-7 cells in opaque 96-well plates were treated with various concentrations of mock (DMSO, 0.1%), cerulenin, C75, triacsin C, 1e, A922500, betulinic acid, CI-976, or PHB and incubated for 72 hrs. After 72 hr, the medium containing NBD-cholesterol (1 μg/ml) was replaced and cells were further incubated for 12 hrs. Then cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 10 min, and washed with PBS. The fluorescence signals of the cells were observed under a fluorescent microscope.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
> Rotaviral diarrheal remained as one of the most important causes for mortality worldwide. > there is no specific antiviral drug for rotavirus infection. > Triacsin C, a fungal metabolite, was found to be highly effective against rotavirus replication. > One triacsin C analog, TC20, was highly effective in a nanomolar concentration range with a high therapeutic index. > Triacsin C and/or its analogs are potential therapeutic options for rotavirus infections.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH U01AI081891. The authors thank Samira Najm for technical assistance. SH would like to thank support from the International Cooperation Program for Excellent Lectures of Shandong Provincial Education Department, P. R. China.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- [1].Estes MK, Kapikian AZ. Rotaviruses. 5 ed Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Angel J, Franco MA, Greenberg HB. Rotavirus vaccines: recent developments and future considerations. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:529–539. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Dennehy PH. Rotavirus vaccines--an update. Vaccine. 2007;25:3137–3141. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Farthing MJ. Treatment of gastrointestinal viruses. Novartis Found Symp. 2001;238:289–300. doi: 10.1002/0470846534.ch18. discussion 300-285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Cuadras MA, Greenberg HB. Rotavirus infectious particles use lipid rafts during replication for transport to the cell surface in vitro and in vivo. Virology. 2003;313:308–321. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6822(03)00326-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Cheung W, Gill M, Esposito A, Kaminski CF, Courousse N, Chwetzoff S, Trugnan G, Keshavan N, Lever A, Desselberger U. Rotaviruses associate with cellular lipid droplet components to replicate in viroplasms, and compounds disrupting or blocking lipid droplets inhibit viroplasm formation and viral replication. J Virol. 2010;84:6782–6798. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01757-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Miyanari Y, Atsuzawa K, Usuda N, Watashi K, Hishiki T, Zayas M, Bartenschlager R, Wakita T, Hijikata M, Shimotohno K. The lipid droplet is an important organelle for hepatitis C virus production. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:1089–1097. doi: 10.1038/ncb1631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Ogawa K, Hishiki T, Shimizu Y, Funami K, Sugiyama K, Miyanari Y, Shimotohno K. Hepatitis C virus utilizes lipid droplet for production of infectious virus. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2009;85:217–228. doi: 10.2183/pjab.85.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Samsa MM, Mondotte JA, Iglesias NG, Assuncao-Miranda I, Barbosa-Lima G, Da Poian AT, Bozza PT, Gamarnik AV. Dengue virus capsid protein usurps lipid droplets for viral particle formation. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000632. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Kim Y, Chang KO. Inhibitory Effects of Bile Acids and Synthetic Farnesoid X Receptor Agonists on Rotavirus Replication. J Virol. 2011 doi: 10.1128/JVI.05839-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Towle HC, Kaytor EN, Shih HM. Regulation of the expression of lipogenic enzyme genes by carbohydrate. Annu Rev Nutr. 1997;17:405–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Soupene E, Kuypers FA. Mammalian long-chain acyl-CoA synthetases. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2008;233:507–521. doi: 10.3181/0710-MR-287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Chang TY, Li BL, Chang CC, Urano Y. Acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferases. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009;297:E1–9. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90926.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Yen CL, Stone SJ, Koliwad S, Harris C, Farese RV., Jr. Thematic review series: glycerolipids. DGAT enzymes and triacylglycerol biosynthesis. J Lipid Res. 2008;49:2283–2301. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800018-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Buhman KK, Chen HC, Farese RV., Jr. The enzymes of neutral lipid synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:40369–40372. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R100050200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Tanaka H, Yoshida K, Itoh Y, Imanaka H. Structure and synthesis of a new hypotensive vasodilator isolated from Streptomyces Aureofaciens. Tetrahedron Letters. 1981;22:3421–3422. [Google Scholar]
- [17].Tanaka H, Yoshida K, Itoh Y, Imanaka H. Studies on new vasodilators, WS-1228 A and B. II. Structure and synthesis. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1982;35:157–163. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.35.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Miranda JA, Wade CJ, Little RD. Indirect electroreductive cyclization and electrohydrocyclization using catalytic reduced nickel(II) salen. J Org Chem. 2005;70:8017–8026. doi: 10.1021/jo051148+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Fujimoto Y, Itabe H, Sakai J, Makita M, Noda J, Mori M, Higashi Y, Kojima S, Takano T. Identification of major proteins in the lipid droplet-enriched fraction isolated from the human hepatocyte cell line HuH7. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1644:47–59. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2003.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Fujimoto Y, Itabe H, Kinoshita T, Homma KJ, Onoduka J, Mori M, Yamaguchi S, Makita M, Higashi Y, Yamashita A, Takano T. Involvement of ACSL in local synthesis of neutral lipids in cytoplasmic lipid droplets in human hepatocyte HuH7. J Lipid Res. 2007;48:1280–1292. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M700050-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Omura S, Tomoda H, Xu QM, Takahashi Y, Iwai Y. Triacsins, new inhibitors of acyl-CoA synthetase produced by Streptomyces sp. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1986;39:1211–1218. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.39.1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Igal RA, Wang P, Coleman RA. Triacsin C blocks de novo synthesis of glycerolipids and cholesterol esters but not recycling of fatty acid into phospholipid: evidence for functionally separate pools of acyl-CoA. Biochem J. 1997;324(Pt 2):529–534. doi: 10.1042/bj3240529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Kim JH, Lewin TM, Coleman RA. Expression and characterization of recombinant rat Acyl-CoA synthetases 1, 4, and 5. Selective inhibition by triacsin C and thiazolidinediones. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:24667–24673. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010793200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Litchfield JT, Jr., Wilcoxon F. A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1949;96:99–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Hygiene. 1938;27:493–497. [Google Scholar]
- [26].Frolov A, Petrescu A, Atshaves BP, So PT, Gratton E, Serrero G, Schroeder F. High density lipoprotein-mediated cholesterol uptake and targeting to lipid droplets in intact L-cell fibroblasts. A single- and multiphoton fluorescence approach. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:12769–12780. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.17.12769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].McDonough PM, Agustin RM, Ingermanson RS, Loy PA, Buehrer BM, Nicoll JB, Prigozhina NL, Mikic I, Price JH. Quantification of lipid droplets and associated proteins in cellular models of obesity via high-content/high-throughput microscopy and automated image analysis. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2009;7:440–460. doi: 10.1089/adt.2009.0196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.