Cancer-Related Fatigue

Abstract

Background

Many cancer patients suffer from cancer-related fatigue (CRF) both during and after their treatment. CRF can arise at any point in the course of the disease and can be either self-limited or persistent, sometimes for years. It gives rise to a vicious circle of impaired physical performance, avoidance of exertion, inactivity, inadequate physical recovery, helplessness, and depressed mood. Its hallmarks are tiredness, exhaustion, and lack of energy; it can impair performance so severely that the patient is unable to work. It is associated with increased mortality. Cancer patients are hardly ever systematically asked about the symptoms and signs of CRF. The stress and impairments that it produces are often inadequately appreciated, and the opportunities for treatment often neglected.

Method

Selective review of the pertinent literature, including published guidelines from Germany and abroad.

Results

The pathogenesis of CRF is complex, involving an interaction of somatic, emotional, cognitive, and psychosocial factors, with a highly variable pattern of clinical expression. Clinical history-taking plays a key role in diagnostic assessment. Depressive disorders must be considered in the differential diagnosis. Many randomized trials and meta-analyses have documented the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for CRF.

Conclusion

Cancer-related fatigue is a serious problem that impairs patients physically, mentally, and socially. Physicians need to know how to recognize and treat it.

Awide variety of complex diagnostic and therapeutic techniques that have arisen through advances in modern oncology now enable more frequent cures, or at least longer survival and a better quality of life, for patients with cancer. Unfortunately, however, for many patients this also means that they will have to endure arduous treatment regimens, and in addition may suffer long term sequelae subsequent to their illness and its treatment.

Fatigue, lack of energy, exhaustion, and impaired physical performance are among the most common symptoms in cancer patients and can have severe physical, emotional, and social effects. The syndrome of fatigue and exhaustion in cancer patients is commonly described as “cancer-related fatigue” (CRF) by oncologists around the world (1).

Learning objectives

In this article, we discuss the following aspects of CRF:

• clinical features,

• epidemiology,

• etiology and pathogenesis,

• diagnostic evaluation and differential diagnosis, and

• pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments of CRF.

Main features of cancer-related fatigue.

The most common symptoms are fatigue, lack of energy, exhaustion, and impaired physical performance.

Methods

This article is based on a selective review of the pertinent literature (retrieved by searches in the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline), also taking account of the guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN, [2]) and the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin [DEGAM], [3]), as well as a consensus statement of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC, [4]).

Clinical features

The multifarious manifestations of CRF include feelings of exhaustion and lack of energy, loss of drive and personal interests, and impaired memory and concentration. The affected patients vary widely in their manner of expressing and describing the problems that they experience. Qualitative studies have shown that the clinical features are highly individual, and hardly any two patients are alike (5, e1). Typically, no clear relation exists between the symptoms and whatever activities immediately precede them; moreover, unlike normal fatigue and exhaustion, CRF often fails to improve, or does so only slightly, after rest or sleep (6). Many patients also suffer from pain, sleep disturbances, and emotional distress, including anxiety and depression (7– 9) (Box 1).

Box 1. Clinical features of cancer-related fatigue.

• CRF involves a vicious circle of diminished physical performance, inactivity, avoidance of effort, absence of regeneration, helplessness, and depressed mood.

• The more severe the symptoms of CRF are during cancer treatment, the more likely they are to persist or recur afterward.

• The following are risk factors for CRF:

  • pain

  • nausea

  • pre-existing depressive disorders

  • other emotional disturbances and stressors

Among all symptoms that tend to affect cancer patients in particular—e.g., pain, sleep disturbances, lack of appetite, or nausea—those of CRF are perceived as most distressing (e2, e3). CRF markedly impairs the quality of life and the physical performance ability of many of the affected patients (10, e3, e4).

Risk factors for cancer-related fatigue.

• Pain

• Nausea

• Pre-existing depressive disorder

• Other emotional disturbances and stressors

Multiple prospective studies have shown an association of the manifestations of CRF with shorter survival and increased mortality (e5, e6). CRF can arise at any point in the course of the disease: It may be an early symptom even before the cancer is diagnosed, or it may arise during the treatment, long after the treatment is over, or when the disease recurs or progresses. Its symptoms may be temporary, but they may also persist, remaining present in some cases for years after the end of treatment (e7). The worse the symptoms of CRF are during the treatment phase (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy), the more likely they are to persist or recur once the treatment is over (e8).

Effects

Depending on the course and severity of the underlying disease, the effects of CRF can range from temporary indisposition to inadequate coping with everyday life and social withdrawal (e9) all the way to the inability to perform one’s job and earn a living, leading to economic hardship for the patient and an additional economic burden for society at large (e10, e11). Thus, CRF clearly poses a problem not only for the patients themselves, but also for the persons around them (e12).

Many studies have shown that physicians generally fail to ask cancer patients systematically about the symptoms and signs of CRF. Therefore, the treating teams often do not realize the extent of stress and impairment caused by CRF and consequently underestimate the need for treatment (11, 12). There are reasons for inadequate communication about CRF on both sides of the physician–patient relationship. Patients may not volunteer information about the symptoms of CRF for fear of seeming to complain too much, or they may think these are “normal” side effects of their disease and its treatment. They may also fear that such symptoms herald a recurrence of cancer, or that mentioning them could delay treatment (e13, e14). On the other hand, treating teams may miss the opportunity to communicate appropriately about CRF because of time pressure or because of inadequate acquaintance with the diagnosis and treatment of CRF (11). Not least, both the treating physician(s) and the patient’s family and friends may wrongly compare the patient’s symptoms with their own everyday fatigue and fail to take the manifestations of CRF seriously (e15, e16).

A vicious circle.

The worse the symptoms of CRF are during the treatment phase (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy), the more likely they are to persist or recur once the treatment is over.

Prevalence

When interpreting epidemiological figures about cancer-related fatigue (CRF), one must bear in mind that CRF is not a single nosological entity, even though it is characterized by a typical constellation of symptoms and signs. In epidemiological studies, the frequency of CRF is often gauged with the aid of self-assessment questionnaires. Those that include items about the various dimensions of CRF (somatic, affective, and cognitive), such as the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), are considered the “gold standard” (e17). In reality, however, many different types of questionnaires are used, and the thresholds for the assignment of a diagnosis of CRF vary widely as well, with the result that the reported prevalence figures are distributed over a wide range. In a recent longitudinal study of CRF in a representative sample of cancer patients in Germany, symptoms of fatigue and exhaustion that were markedly worse than those of a control group of healthy individuals (as measured on the “general fatigue” subscale of the MFI) were found in 32% of patients on their admission to the hospital, 40% on discharge, and 36% six months later (13). In a further study by Kuhnt et al., 48% of patients still had symptoms and signs of CRF—and 12% had very severe signs and symptoms of CRF—two years after completing their initial treatment (e18). Studies in other countries have yielded comparable findings (e19– e21).

Etiology and pathogenesis

Possible pathophysiological factors.

• Dysregulation of inflammatory cytokines

• Disturbance of hypothalamic regulatory circuits • Changes in the CNS serotoninergic system

• A disturbance of circadian melatonin secretion

• Gene polymorphisms for regulatory proteins

All explanatory models of the causes and mechanisms of fatigue and exhaustion proceed from the assumption of a complex, multifactorial process. The causes and mechanisms of CRF may be associated with the tumor itself or with its treatment, or indeed with a potential genetic predisposition, an accompanying physical or mental illness, or behavioral and environmental factors (14, 15). Thus, a wide range of possible causes and influences—somatic, affective, cognitive, and psychosocial—that often cannot easily be separated from one another share cancer-related fatigue as a final common pathway. The following underlying pathophysiological factors are discussed in the literature:

• dysregulation of inflammatory cytokines (e22– e25),

• a disturbance of hypothalamic regulatory circuits (e26– e28),

• changes in the CNS serotoninergic system (e29, e30),

• a disturbance of circadian melatonin secretion and the sleep-wake rhythm (e31– e33), and

• gene polymorphisms for regulatory proteins of oxidative phosphorylation, signal transduction in B cells, the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and catecholamine metabolism (e34– e37).

The causes of reduced physical performance ability, which is a common problem, are thought to lie in changes in the cortical and spinal sensorimotor centers (e38), in energy metabolism, and in the process of muscular activation (e39).

Diagnostic evaluation.

According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline, all cancer patients should be directly asked about symptoms of fatigue and exhaustion at regular intervals during their treatment and their further follow-up.

Diagnostic evaluation

According to the NCCN guideline, all cancer patients should be directly asked about symptoms of fatigue and exhaustion at regular intervals during their treatment and their further follow-up (2). The use of a visual analogue scale is recommended for recording the intensity of symptoms in the week leading up to the moment of inquiry (0 = no fatigue; 10 = worst fatigue you can imagine). A reported intensity of 4 or above is taken as the threshold value for further diagnostic assessment. The use of visual analogue scales is also recommended for assessing the degree to which CRF impairs the patient in various areas of everyday life; values of 5 and above are taken to imply a severe limitation of the patient’s social functioning that must be taken seriously (e40). If symptoms and signs suggesting CRF are, in fact, present, the further diagnostic assessment can be complicated by the following difficulties:

• The symptoms and signs of CRF are not specific, as they may also be due to other diseases or functional impairments.

• The clinical picture of CRF is defined solely by the affected patient’s subjective assessment of his or her symptoms and impairments.

• Persons with CRF often do not seem to be ill, even if CRF has severe effects on them.

• The type and extent of symptoms varies markedly from one patient to another and can change over time as well.

• There is no reliable laboratory test or functional study for CRF.

The two-question test for depressive disorders.

The two-question test should be adminstered as part of the diagnostic assessment, as CRF may be an expression of pre-existing depression.

The complexity of this situation necessitates a deliberate and practically conceived approach whose main goal is to identify treatable causes and contributing factors (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Cancer-related fatigue: treatable causes and contributing factors (after Ref. [e81]). (From: Mortimer JE, et al.: Studying cancer-related fatigue: Report of the NCCN Scientific Research Committee. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010; 8: 1331–9; Reprinted with permission from JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network)

History-taking plays a central role in the diagnostic process. The physician should ask specifically about the type, severity, and temporal course of the patient’s symptoms, paying attention to their possible relationship to vegetative functions (e.g. sleep pattern) and other factors such as the following:

• social and environmental factors

• medications (including self-administered ones)

• alcohol, tobacco, recreational drugs

• past medical history

• physical exercise.

The physician should also ask whether the symptoms are felt to be new or unusual. The history, in combination with the physical examination, can provide clues to possible causes or contributing factors (3) (Figure 2). If the history, physical examination, and basic laboratory tests yield no evidence of any underlying functional disturbance, further laboratory testing and ancillary studies are generally of little use. Therefore, according to the DEGAM guidelines, these should only be performed if the basic diagnostic assessment yields unequivocally abnormal findings (3).

Figure 2.

Basic and detailed diagnostic assessment

History-taking.

When taking the history, the physician should inquire about the nature, severity, and temporal course of symptoms and their possible relationship to vegetative functions.

With regard to the differential diagnosis of CRF, physicians are often faced with the important task of determining its possible relationship to a depressive disorder. The symptoms of fatigue and exhaustion have been found to be correlated with those of depressivity in nearly all studies that have addressed the question (8); this is hardly surprising, as easy fatigability and a lack of drive are considered to be among the main symptoms of depressive disorders. Nonetheless, according to the findings of two studies, only about one-third of persons suffering from severe CRF also have major depression, as defined by the DSM-IV (e41, e42). In clinical practice, a depressive disorder that may underlie CRF can be detected rapidly and sensitively with two questions (e43): If the patient answers both questions affirmatively, a depressive disorder is very likely to be present and therefore merits further, specialized diagnostic evaluation (Box 2). \

Box 2. The two-question test for depressive disorders, to be administered during history-taking.

Cancer-related fatigue can be an expression of (pre-existing) depression and can also be a cause of depression.

The two-question test consists of the following questions:

• “In the last month, have you often felt dejected, sad, depressed, or hopeless?”

• “In the last month, have you gotten much less pleasure than usual out of the things that you normally like to do?”

Differential diagnosis.

The possible presence of a depressive disorder must be investigated.

Treatment.

The causes of the patient’s symptoms can be treated both pharmacologically and non-pharmacologically.

Clinical experience with CRF patients indicates that many of them have no identifiable somatic or psychosocial cause for their symptoms. Physicians must beware of writing off the symptoms of CRF as “illegitimate” solely because of this. Rather, it is precisely this fact that makes it all the more important for the physician to take the patient’s symptoms and stresses seriously, and to show a readiness to talk about them and treat them. Repeated follow-up—even weeks or months after initial evaluation—often reveals additional information that may help establish or confirm a diagnosis (3).

Initiation of Treatment.

Treatment should be initiated early to prevent chronification.

Treatment

In most cases, CRF must be treated in the absence of a clearly diagnosed cause, but with the knowledge of a number of potential contributing factors (Figure 3). The treatment should be initiated early, to prevent CRF from turning into a chronic problem (e8). Multiple treatment approaches should be jointly applied, with an orientation toward the individual pattern of physical, mental, and cognitive symptoms, the extent of functional impairment, and the patient’s own conceptualization of the problem. The important persons in the patient’s life should also be included in treatment planning (e44).

Figure 3.

Treatment algorithm (modified from Radbruch et al [4]); TRH, thyrotropin-releasing hormone; ESA, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent. (From: Radbruch L, et al.: Fatigue in palliative care patients—an EAPC approach. Palliat Med 2008; 22: 13–32; with the kind permission of SAGE Publications)

The central goals of treatment are:

• alleviating any factors that may be worsening the patient’s CRF,

• offering individualized help so that the patient can cope with the symptoms and stresses of CRF,

• activating the patient’s strengths and resources,

• and working toward a shared biopsychosocial conception of the situation that takes its many different aspects into account.

The central goals of treatment.

• Alleviate factors that worsen CRF

• Help the patient cope with symptoms & stresses

• Activate the patient’s strengths and resources

• Maintain a biopsychosocial view

As as first step, the patient should be comprehensively informed about CRF and given appropriate counseling. Many patients are unaware that there is such a thing as CRF and cannot understand why they are so exhausted—especially if they seem to have achieved cure. Many patients find that the people around them cannot understand the problem either. Just knowing that their symptoms have a name and can be treated can give patients a large measure of emotional relief (e45). It is also important to tell patients that CRF need not have a bad outcome (e46). The physician can alleviate or prevent fears of prolonged and intractable fatigue by discussing CRF prophylactically before the treatment of the tumor is begun (e8).

All of the suggestions below for treating CRF with medications, or with non-pharmacological measures, are derived from randomized controlled trials and/or summaries of such trials in review articles and meta-analyses. They thus correspond to evidence levels 1 and 2 of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

Non-pharmacological treatments

There are many ways to alleviate the symptoms and stresses of CRF without recourse to medications.

The findings of two recent meta-analyses and numerous randomized controlled trials enable us to recommend certain specific psychosocial interventions and special types of physical exercise (16, 17).

Psychosocial interventions—The main interventions of this type that can alleviate CRF include cognitive behavioral therapeutic approaches (16, 17, e47); psychoeducation and directed, topical counseling (16, 17); energy conservation and activity management; and methods for the promotion and reinforcement of regeneration (17, e48, e49) (Table 1).

Non-pharmacological treatments of CRF supported by evidence from systematic reviews (SR), meta-analyses (MA), and randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT).

Type of intervention	Description	Sources of evidence
Exercise	Endurance and strength training at moderate intensity several times a week for 30 to 45 minutes, gradually increasing intensity, individualized exercises, supervision by physician or physical therapist desirable (necessary for strength training)	SR/MA: (e70– e72)
		RCT: (e73, e74)
Psychoeducation, cognitive behavioral therapy	Targeted information and counseling about CRF, stress reduction, identification of adaptive and maladaptive attitudes, relief of anxiety, assistance in coping with stress, promotion of active problem-centered coping strategies, learning of control techniques	SR/MA: (e71, e75, e76)
		RCT: (e47, e77)
Activity and energy management	Rational apportionment of physical effort, task planning, taking of breaks and rest periods, health-promoting measures	SR/MA: (e76)
		RCT: (e48, e49)
Relaxation techniques, mindfulness	Progressive muscle relaxation, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)	RCT: (e78, e79)

While behavioral therapy (including cognitive behavioral therapy) and so-called mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) are specialized techniques that must be carried out by trained experts, the remaining interventions can be incorporated into routine general medical practice, as long as the necessary infrastructure is available.

The physician–patient relationship.

Psychoeducational interventions and topic-centered counseling are important elements of a supportive treatment plan.

Energy conservation and activity management are intended to help patients economize with their physical resources, e.g., by doing only the most important tasks themselves, resting at appropriate intervals, and planning time for pleasant diversions (e.g., going to the movies, meeting friends, or listening to music).

Physical exercise.

Strength and endurance training helps the patient escape from the vicious circle of physical inactivity, deconditioning, and rapid exhaustion; it can be recommended to all patients with CRF, as long as no contraindications are present.

Psychoeducation and topical counseling are important elements of a supportive treatment plan. Directed cognitive behavioral therapeutic approaches have proven particularly useful (17, e47); the aim of such approaches is to illuminate the relationship of the physical symptoms with the way they are subjectively assessed (e.g., as “unpleasant” versus “catastrophic”), the resulting emotional states (e.g., worry versus despair), and patterns of behavior. Patients should be helped to understand that an appropriate assessment of the situation can improve their quality of life. Cognitive behavioral therapy and MBSR can also alleviate the hypersomnia and insomnia that often accompany CRF (2). In addition, they can equip the patient with ways to cope with the illness and the consequences of its treatment and limit emotional distress in the form of fears, mood shifts, and so forth.

Physical exercise—Strength and endurance training programs help the patient escape from the vicious circle of physical inactivity, deconditioning, and rapid exhaustion; they can be recommended to all patients with CRF (18, e50), as long as no contraindications are present (Box 3). The German Society for Sports Medicine and Prevention (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sportmedizin und Prävention) and the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft) have issued guidelines for training and exercise prorgrams for cancer patients (19).

Box 3. Calculation of the maximal heart rate, according to Lagerstrøm (Ref. [15]).

• In the acute-care hospital: 180 minus age in years

• In the rehabilitation phase, for endurance sports such as cycling and rowing: 220 minus age

• In the rehabilitation phase, for non-strength-oriented sports such as swimming and jogging: 220 minus 2/3 of age

These are only rules of thumb; beware of demanding excessive effort from patients!

Pharmacotherapy.

Medications with various mechanisms of action are used to treat CRF, including psychostimulants, phytotherapeutic agents, growth factors, and corticosteroids.

Ideally, medically prescribed physical exercise sessions should take place several times per week, with daily endurance exercises and twice-weekly exercises to improve strength. Each training session should last 30 to 45 minutes (20) (Box 4). From the patient’s point of view, there are often multiple hindrances to the implementation of an ideal exercise program of this type, which should, in the best case, be continued for life: These include physical limitations, lack of interest, and purported lack of opportunity (e51). The physician should detect any such hindrances by directed history-taking and endeavor to overcome them with appropriate counseling or behavioral therapeutic approaches, so that physical exercise becomes a regular part of the patient’s daily routine. It is useful to encourage patients to do their own favorite types of physical exercise and to adapt the intensity and duration of each training session to their current capabilities and illness situation, with a gradual increase over four to six weeks (21). At the end of this period, the degree of physical exertion during exercise should not exceed 70% to 80% of the patient’s maximal capacity (maximal heart rate or maximal force). Strength training should generally take place in a facility where it can be overseen by a physical therapist or physician, while moderate endurance training can be introduced as part of routine clinical practice. Effective training involves elevating the heart rate to 70% to 80% of maximum. As a rule, exercise should not be so vigorous as to make the patient short of breath (22).

Box 4. Contraindications to exercise in patients with cancer^*1.

• Absolute contraindications

  • acute illnesses

  • acute worsening or decompensation of chronic illness

  • fever above 38°C

  • pain

  • inadequately controlled arterial hypertension

• Relative contraindications

  • anemia (hemoglobin below 8 g/dL)

  • thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy

  • bone metastases

  • accompanying illnesses such as coronary heart disease, occlusive peripheral arterial disease, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, arthrosis

  • administration of cytostatic agents on the same day

  • mediastinal/cardiac radiation therapy

  • flu-like symptoms under immunotherapy

  • epilepsy

^*1modified from Refs. (22, e80)

Pharmacotherapy

Medications with various mechanisms of action are used to treat CRF, including psychostimulants, phytotherapeutic agents, growth factors, corticosteroids, and antidepressants. Trials of antidepressants to date have not yielded any improvement in CRF (e52). It follows that these should be used only if there is clear evidence for, or a definitive diagnosis of, a depressive disorder.

In the following sections, we will discuss only those forms of treatment whose safety and efficacy have been studied in randomized controlled trials, corresponding to evidence levels 1 and 2 in the scheme of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (Table 2).

Table 2. Randomized controlled double-blind drug intervention trials showing efficacy against CRF as the primary endpoint.

Trial	Design	Patients (number and type)	Intervention	Effect on CRF (primary outcome measure)
Roth 2010 (e58)	Two-armed, parallel, placebo-controlled	68Advanced prostate cancer	Methylphenidate, initially 5 mg po qd, increase by 5 mg/day every 2–3 days possible, maximum dose 15 mg po bid	Improvement after 6 weeks of treatment(BFI)
Lower 2009 (e59)	Two-armed, parallel, placebo-controlled	152Mainly breast and ovarian cancer, all stages	D-MP, initially 5 mg po bid, weekly dose increases possible up to a maximum of 50 mg/day	Improvement after 8 weeks of treatment (FACIT-F)
Jean-Pierre 2010 (e61)	Two-armed, parallel, placebo-controlled	867Various types of cancer, all stages, during chemotherapy	Modafinil, 100 mg po qd, increase to 200 mg/day after 3 days of treatment, maximum dose 400 mg/day	Improvement after 8–12 weeks of treatment among patients with severe CRF (BFI)
Younus 2003 (e66)	Two-armed, parallel, placebo-controlled	20Various types of cancer, various stages, during chemotherapy	Panax ginseng po, dose not indicated, taken daily	Improvement after 9–12 weeks of treatment (BFI)
Barton 2010 (e65)	Four-armed, parallel, placebo-controlled	290 Various types of cancer, all stages, during chemotherapy	Panax quinquefolius, 750–2000 mg/day po	Improvement after 4, resp. 8 weeks in the groups taking 1000 und 2000 mg/day (BFI)
Campos 2011 (e68)	Two-armed, parallel, placebo-controlled	75Breast cancer, all stages, during chemotherapy	Guarana 50 mg po bid	Improvement after 3 and 7 weeks of treatment (FACIT-F)
Kamath 2011 (e63)	Two-armed, crossover, placebo-controlled	9Various types of cancer, various stages	TRH 0.5 mg IV 1x/week,then 1.5 mg IV 1x/week	Improvement 3, 7, & 24 hr after TRH administration, lasting up to 1 week (VAS)

D-MP, dextromethylphenidate; BFI, Brief Fatigue Inventory; FACIT-F, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Fatigue; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; TRH, thyrotropin-releasing hormone

Hematopoietic growth factors—The administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) can relieve CRF in anemic patients undergoing chemotherapy (e53). The expected treatment effect is seen in only a minority of patients, as most patients with CRF are not anemic (e52, e54, e55). A meta-analysis of individual patient data indicated that the administration of ESA during chemotherapy is associated with higher mortality, and that ESA elevate the frequency of thrombotic and thromboembolic events (e56); thus, the benefits and risks of treating CRF with ESA must be critically weighed in every case (e57).

Psychostimulants.

The psychostimulants methylphenidate and modafinil are potentially useful especially for patients with severe CRF that has not responded satisfactorily to other forms of treatment.

Psychostimulants—The psychostimulants methylphenidate (MP) and modafinil (MF) can relieve CRF (23– 25). In Germany, these medications may only be given off-label, or in the setting of a clinical trial, to treat CRF. They are potentially useful especially for patients with severe CRF that has not responded satisfactorily to other forms of treatment. They can only be given in the absence of contraindications such as poorly controlled arterial hypertension, symptomatic coronary heart disease, arrhythmia, or epilepsy (for methylphenidate), or psychosis and severe affective disorders (for modafinil).

Thyreoliberin.

The findings of an initial randomized trial suggest that intravenously administered thyreoliberin (thyrotropin-releasing hormone [TRH]) may be a safe and effective way to treat CRF.

Methylphenidate has been found to relieve moderate-to-severe CRF significantly better than placebo in patients with advanced prostate cancer (e58) and gynecological tumors (e59) (Table 2). A retrospective analysis of trial data suggests that methylphenidate is most effective for patients with severe CRF; that the D-(+) form of methylphenidate is more effective than other forms; and that patients who already benefit from the drug in the first few days of treatment will benefit more from it overall (e60).

Ginseng.

The results of scientific studies permit the tentative conclusion that both Panax quinquefolius and Panax ginseng may effectively alleviate CRF.

The findings of a recent study imply that modafinil is only effective against severe CRF (e61) (Table 2). In any case, in the past year, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has restricted its use to the treatment of adults with excessive sleepiness, because of the occurrence of psychiatric manifestations and cutaneous reactions (erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome).

Corticosteroids—In palliative situations, corticosteroids can temporarily improve CRF and increase patients’ physical activity (e62). Therefore, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommend considering corticosteroids for use in such situations, but for a limited time only, in view of the risk that steroid-induced myopathy might worsen CRF with prolonged use (2, 4).

Thyreoliberin—The findings of an initial randomized trial suggest that intravenously administered thyreoliberin (thyrotropin-releasing hormone [TRH]) may be a safe and effective way to treat CRF (e63). In this trial, the patients’ manifestations of exhaustion improved within a few hours of treatment, and the improvement was sustained for several days (Table 2). In Germany, however, TRH preparations are approved only for diagnostic purposes, not for treatment.

Phytotherapeutic agents—Ginseng is traditionally given to treat states of exhaustion of all kinds (e64). American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) (e65) and Asian ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) (e66) have both been studied scientifically; the results permit the tentative conclusion that both may be effective against CRF (Table 2). In Germany, Panax ginseng preparations are approved for the treatment of states of exhaustion (e67).

Regarding the putative efficacy of guarana (Paullinia cupana), there is initial positive evidence from a randomized trial, in which guarana improved CRF in women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer (e68) (Table 2). The main active ingredient of guarana is caffeine; in the trial just cited, the dose of guarana that was given contained about the same amount of caffeine as two cups of strong coffee, but caffeine is said to be released more slowly from guarana than from coffee (e69).

Guarana.

Regarding the putative efficacy of guarana (Paullinia cupana), there is initial positive evidence from a randomized trial, in which guarana improved CRF in women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Further information on CME.

This article has been certified by the North Rhine Academy for Postgraduate and Continuing Medical Education. Deutsches Ärzteblatt provides certified continuing medical education (CME) in accordance with the requirements of the Medical Associations of the German federal states (Länder). CME points of the Medical Associations can be acquired only through the Internet, not by mail or fax, by the use of the German version of the CME questionnaire within 6 weeks of publication of the article. See the following website: cme.aerzteblatt.de

Participants in the CME program can manage their CME points with their 15-digit “uniform CME number” (einheitliche Fortbildungsnummer, EFN). The EFN must be entered in the appropriate field in the cme.aerzteblatt.de website under “meine Daten” (“my data”), or upon registration. The EFN appears on each participant’s CME certificate. The solutions to the following questions will be published in issue 17/2012.

The CME unit “Functional Bowel Disorders in Adults” (issue 5/2012) can be accessed until 16 March 2012.

For issue 13/2012, we plan to offer the topic “Insect Stings: Clinical Features and Management.”

Solutions to the CME questionnaire in issue 1–2/2012:

Kiefer M, Unterberg A: The Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Solutions: 1c, 2a, 3e, 4d, 5e, 6b, 7a, 8a, 9e, 10b

Please answer the following questions to participate in our certified Continuing Medical Education program. Only one answer is possible per question. Please select the answer that is most appropriate.

Question 1

Which of the following may be a manifestation of cancer-related fatigue?

1. Impaired memory and concentration

2. Recurrent tension headache

3. Tremor and altered gait

4. Lymphadenopathy and skin irritation

5. Ptosis and diplopia

Question 2

What initial laboratory tests are useful for differential diagnosis in patients who first present with symptoms of cancer-related fatigue?

1. EBV, borrelia, hepatitis viruses, M. tuberculosis, herpes viruses

2. Complete blood count, adrenocortical hormones, tumor markers

3. Vitamins, selenium, vitamin D, magnesium, manganese, heavy metals

4. Blood count, electrolytes, glucose, transaminases, ?-GT, CRP, TSH

5. Serotonin, cortisol, melatonin, cytokines, catecholamines

Question 3

Roughly what percentage of patients with severe CRF meet the DSM-IV criteria for major depression?

1. Less than 5%

2. ˜ 10%

3. ˜ 30%

4. ˜ 50–80%

5. More than 80%

Question 4

What temporal relation does CRF have to cancer?

1. CRF usually arises before cancer is diagnosed.

2. CRF usually arises after diagnosis and before the initiation of treatment.

3. CRF usually arises immediately after the end of chemotherapy.

4. CRF usually arises after the completion of radiotherapy.

5. CRF can arise at any point in the course of cancer and its treatment.

Question 5

Which of the following is a known risk factor for CRF?

1. Emotional stress

2. Irritable bowel syndrome

3. Fibromyalgia

4. Migraine

5. Disturbances of impulse control

Question 6

Which of the following statements from the patient points to CRF as the leading element of the differential diagnosis?

1. “All my muscles hurt all the time. I have continuous cramping pain.”

2. “When I come home from shopping, I am so tired that I have to lie down.”

3. “I can hardly fall asleep any more, because so many things are going through my head.”

4. “I have no appetite any more; then again, I can hardly keep any food down, either.”

5. “Every little thing makes me upset now. I feel totally stressed out.”

Question 7

Which of the following absolutely contraindicates physical exercise in a patient with CRF?

1. Anemia with a hemoglobin concentration below 8 g/dL

2. Bone metastases

3. Accompanying illnesses such as coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and arthritis

4. Fever above 38°C

5. Flu-like symptoms under immunotherapy

Question 8

What percentage of maximum capacity (i.e., maximum heart rate or maximum force) is the recommended upper limit of exertion for CRF patients doing physical exercise?

1. 50%

2. 60%

3. 70%

4. 80%

5. 90%

Question 9

What non-pharmacological intervention is suitable for the treatment of patients with CRF?

1. Qigong

2. Cognitive behavioral therapy

3. Whole foods diet

4. Relex zone massage

5. Kinesiology

Question 10

Which of the following preparations is approved in Germany for the treatment of states of exhaustion?

1. Mistletoe

2. Paroxetine

3. Panax ginseng

4. St. John’s wort oil

5. Methylphenidate