Abstract
An imbalance between pro-survival and pro-death pathways in brain cells can lead to neuronal cell death and neurodegeneration. While such imbalance is known to be associated with alterations in glutamatergic and Ca2+ signaling, the underlying mechanisms remain undefined. We identified the protein Ser/Thr phosphatase protein phosphatase-1 (PP1), an enzyme associated with glutamate receptors, as a key trigger of survival pathways that can prevent neuronal death and neurodegeneration in the adult hippocampus. We show that PP1α overexpression in hippocampal neurons limits NMDA receptor overactivation and Ca2+ overload during an excitotoxic event, while PP1 inhibition favors Ca2+ overload and cell death. The protective effect of PP1 is associated with a selective dephosphorylation on a residue phosphorylated by CaMKIIα on the NMDA receptor subunit NR2B, which promotes pro-survival pathways and associated transcriptional programs. These results reveal a novel contributor to the mechanisms of neuroprotection and underscore the importance of PP1-dependent dephosphorylation in these mechanisms. They provide a new target for the development of potential therapeutic treatment of neurodegeneration.
Introduction
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are essential receptors for excitatory neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity in the nervous system. The activity of these receptors is tightly controlled by pre-synaptic glutamate release and intracellular protein kinases and phosphatases through post-translational modifications. Alterations in NMDAR functions and in the balance between downstream kinases and phosphatases can occur in pathological conditions, and lead to neuronal excitotoxicity. Excitotoxicity is a detrimental cellular process that results from excessive glutamate release, subsequent over-activation of NMDARs and intracellular calcium (Ca2+) overload. While high Ca2+ influx through NMDARs is generally deleterious and activates signaling pathways inducing cell death, it can however also be beneficial and stimulate cell survival pathways leading to neuroprotection [1], [2], [3]. The mechanisms that control the recruitment of cell death or cell survival pathways upon activation of NMDARs are thought to depend in part, on the Ca2+ concentration and its route of entry, but mostly on the subunit composition and localization of the NMDARs that it activates [4], [5]. Several pieces of evidence have suggested that heteromeric NR1/NR2B receptors are initial triggers of cell death pathways, while NR1/NR2A receptors rather lead to cell survival [6]. First, in mature cortical cultures and in rat in vivo, the activation of NR2B-containing NMDARs results in excitotoxicity, while the activation of NR2A-containing NMDARs promotes neuroprotection [6]. Second, NR2B-containing NMDARs are thought to be localized preferentially at extrasynaptic sites while NR2A-containing NMDARs are synaptic [7], [8], and activation of extrasynaptic NMDARs and associated downstream signaling cascades correlates with a pro-death transcriptional response while activation of synaptic NMDARs lead to pro-survival transcriptional response [9]. Third, neurotoxicity induced by glutamate release from astrocytes involves preferentially extrasynaptic NR2B-containing NMDARs [10], [11]. Finally, glutamate sensitivity in neurons increases proportionally to the level of NR1/NR2B expression [12] as NR2B-containing NMDARs have a higher affinity for glutamate, slower deactivation kinetics, and reduced Ca2+-dependent desensitization when compared to NR2A-containing receptors [13]. Despite the multiple evidence supporting a role for NR2B-containing NMDARs in excitotoxicity however, the major regulators of these receptors have remained undefined.
Protein phosphorylation is a post-translational modification that constitutes one of the major modes of regulation of the NMDAR. Phosphorylation controls the functional properties of NMDARs and the surface expression of NMDAR subunits (Lee 2006, Salter 2004, Prybylowski 2004). While several protein kinases are known to phosphorylate the NMDAR i.e. death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1) [14], Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent protein kinase II alpha (CaMKIIα) [15], PKA [16], PKC [17] and Src family kinases [18], it is not entirely clear which protein phosphatase(s) can induce dephosphorylation. This is an important limitation because dephosphorylation is as essential as phosphorylation for the control of the receptor's activity. One of the potential protein phosphatases that may be involved is protein phosphatase 1 (PP1). It has several features that make it a likely candidate for regulating the NMDAR. PP1 is highly abundant in neurons, and following NMDAR activation, it is recruited to the receptor and associates with it by binding to specific targeting partners. There, it decreases NMDAR activity and synaptic strength by reducing the receptors open probability [19], [20]. Further, when activated in hippocampal neurons, for instance after induction of synaptic plasticity, PP1 can exert neuroprotective functions, while in contrast, its inhibition exacerbates the detrimental effect of excitotoxicity [21].
This study examined the contribution of PP1 to the regulation of the NMDAR in CA1 hippocampal neurons, and its implication in neuroprotective pathways. We used oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) in organotypic hippocampal cultures to induce NMDAR-dependent neuronal excitotoxicity [22]. It involves mechanisms such as membrane depolarization with calcium entry into the cell and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. We demonstrate that PP1α can regulate NR2B-containing NMDARs by dephosphorylating a specific residue on NR2B, and that this leads to a reduction in Ca2+ overload and an attenuation of excitotoxic damage. The data shows that PP1α promotes key signaling cascades downstream of the NMDAR through altered phosphorylation, and can thereby initiate pro-survival programs.
Materials and Methods
Vector construction, virus production and titration
The lentiviral vector pLVPRT-tTRKRAB [23] was used as a backbone to generate pLVPRT-tTRKRAB-PP1α and pLVPRT-tTRKRAB-PP1α-EGFP for inducible PP1α expression in neurons. Full-length coding sequence of human (mutated rabbit) PP1α alone or fused with EGFP (PP1α or PP1α-EGFP) from pEGFP-C1-PP1α [24] was subcloned between the MluI and SmaI sites of pLVPRT-tTRKRAB. The constructs were sequenced before virus production. Recombinant lentiviruses were produced as previously described [23] using pLVPRT-tTRKRAB-PP1α (PP1α virus), pLVPRT-tTRKRAB-PP1α-EGFP (PP1α-EGFP virus), a native pLVPRT-tTRKRAB vector (control virus), a packaging encoding vector psPAX2 and the envelope encoding vector pMD2G. Viral particles were titrated using the HIV-1 p24 ELISA test (PerkinElmer), according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Slice culture and viral infection
Organotypic hippocampal slices from 5–7 day old postnatal wild-type C57/BL6 or I-1 transgenic mice were prepared and cultured for 2 weeks using the roller-tube technique [25]. Slices prepared from wild-type C57/BL6 mice were transferred to an empty electrophysiological recording chamber at room temperature and the CA1 pyramidal cell layer was injected with lentiviral preparations (∼2.108 TU/ml, 5–10 injection sites, total volume of 2 µl). Artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF): (in mM) 119 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 26 NaHCO3, 1.3 NaH2PO4, 1.3 MgCl2, 2.5 CaCl2, and 11 D-glucose, pH 7.4, saturated with 95% O2, 5% CO2) was used for control injections. Slices were returned to roller tubes after injection, and cultured for 1–2 weeks in medium supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (1∶500; Sigma). One day before analysis, culture medium was supplemented with 1 µg/ml doxycycline hyclate (Sigma) to induce PP1α-EGFP, PP1α or I-1 transgene expression. All animal experiments have been approved by the federal veterinary office (FVO).
Induction of oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD)
Slices were taken out of the sealed test tubes and washed once in normal aCSF (see slice culture and viral infection) before OGD was induced. For this, normal aCSF solution was replaced with an aCSF solution deprived of oxygen (saturated with 95% N2, 5% CO2) and glucose (replaced with 11 mM sucrose) and slices were put back in the incubator for 4 min. Initial conditions were restored after the 4-min OGD.
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR
For each sample, total RNA from three hippocampal slices was extracted using the NucleoSpin Kit II (Macherey-Nagel), purified with Promega's RQ1 DNase and reverse-transcribed using the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR II (Invitrogen). Quantitative PCR was performed using Taqman probes (Applied Biosystems) and an Applied Biosystem 7500 Thermal Cycler. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate and equal amount of cDNA was plated. Values were chosen in the linear range of amplification and comparative Ct method was used to assess difference in gene expression between samples [26]. β-actin was used as internal control.
Immunohistochemistry
Slices were fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma), 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB), pH 7.4. Free-floating sections were washed in 0.1 m PB (3×1 h), blocked and permeabilized in 0.1 M PB, 0.4% Triton X-100 (Sigma) and 10% heat-inactivated horse serum (HS; Sigma) for 24 h at 4°C. Slices were incubated with primary rabbit anti-EGFP (Synaptic Systems) and anti-NeuN (Chemicon) antibodies (1∶1000) for 72 h at 4°C in 0.1 M PB, 0.4% Triton X-100 and 10% HS. Cultures were washed in 0.1 M PB 0.4% Triton X-100 (3×1 h) and incubated overnight at 4°C with goat anti-rabbit IgG-FITC and donkey anti-mouse IgG-TRITC fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies (1∶1000; Jackson ImmunoResearch). After washing in 0.1 M PB, cultures were mounted using Moviol (Molecular Probes) and stored in the dark at 4°C. Fluorescent images at low magnification were acquired with a CoolSNAPK4 digital camera (Roper Scientific) mounted on an Axiophot microscope (Zeiss) and analysed using MCID Elite 7.0 software (MCID). High magnification images were taken with a Zeiss LSM 410 confocal laser-scanning microscope using excitation wavelengths of 543 nm (TRITC) and 488 nm (FITC), and images were averaged to improve signal-to-noise ratio.
Whole-cell recording
Hippocampal slices injected with aCSF, PP1α, PP1α-EGFP or control virus treated with doxycycline were recorded in whole-cell configuration. After 15 min of baseline, slices were exposed to 4 min OGD (hypoxic/aglycemic conditions) by switching the perfusion from normal aCSF (see slice culture and viral infection) to an aCSF solution deprived of oxygen (saturated with 95% N2, 5% CO2) and glucose (replaced with 11 mM sucrose). After the 4-min OGD, perfusion with normal aCSF was reinstalled. Recordings were obtained from CA1 pyramidal neurons at −50 mV. Patch pipettes (4–8 MΩ) were filled with (in mM) 140 K-gluconate, 10 NaCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, and 1 EGTA (pH 7.2–7.4). Series resistance, typically between 10 and 20 MΩ, was regularly monitored and if a change of more than 10% occurred, cells were excluded. NMDA (100 µM, Sigma) was pressure ejected (1 bar, 200 ms) at 40 s intervals from a pipette positioned ∼100 µm from the soma of recorded cells. To isolate the evoked NMDA receptor-mediated currents, the AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist NBQX 10 µM, the GABAA antagonist picrotoxin 100 µM (Sigma) and the voltage-gated Na+ channel blocker tetrodotoxin 1 µM were added to the bath solution. Specificity of NMDA receptor currents was verified at the end of recordings by application of a modified aCSF without Mg2+ and containing the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (10 µM). Currents were filtered at 1–2 kHz, stored, and analyzed off-line. Individual responses to NMDA were measured from the holding current to the peak and the OGD effect was expressed relative to the pre-conditioning baseline (mean response over 5 min prior to OGD and normalized to 100%). Ifenprodil (3 µM; Tocris Bioscience), NVP-AAM077 (0.1 µM; kindly provided by Y. Auberson, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) or KN-93 (5 µM; Calbiochem) were added to the perfusion 15 min before recording of the pre-conditioning baseline and maintained through recording. After 5 min of baseline, slices were exposed to 4-min OGD (as above). Recordings were made using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments), monitored on-line and analyzed off-line using pCLAMP. Data were pooled across slices and expressed as mean ± SEM.
Ca2+ imaging
CA1 pyramidal cells were filled with the Ca2+ indicator Oregon Green 488 BAPTA-1 (20 µM; Invitrogen) via whole-cell recording patch pipettes (4–8 MΩ; series resistance 10–20 MΩ) as previously described [27]. Cells were clamped at −50 mV as described in the whole-cell recording section. The indicator was added to the intracellular solution and excited at 488 nm using a Polychrome I monochromator from TILL Photonics (Planegg). Fluorescence images were collected with a cooled CCD camera (Princeton Instruments) after passing through a FITC emission filter set, and stored using a software custom-written in the LABVIEW environment (National Instruments). Time series of 50 images were collected at 15 sec intervals (exposure time 100 msec) and analyzed using ImageJ software. The time course of relative fluorescence changes (ΔF/F) was analyzed after background subtraction in regions of interest over the soma as the percentage ratio (F-F0)/F0, where F0 is the average fluorescence during the baseline period.
Co-expression of NR2B and TN-XXL calcium indicator
The NR2B mutated construct (NR2B S1303A) was produced by PCR-based mutagenesis (QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit, Stratagene) using full-length NR2B within pRK7-NR2B. Both pRK7-NR2B (NR2B S1303 WT) and pRK7-NR2B S1303A (NR2B S1303A) constructs were verified by sequencing. To achieve NR2B expression and subsequently quantify [Ca2+]i load in CA1 pyramidal neurons, organotypic hippocampal cultures (DIV14-17) were co-transfected with one of the NR2B constructs (NR2B S1303 WT and S1303A) and the TN-XXL construct encoding a calcium indicator [28], using Gene Gun (BioRad) biolistic transfection. Slices transfected with TN-XXL construct alone were used as control. Successfully transfected cells were subjected to OGD and analyzed by Ca2+ imaging.
Propidium iodide labeling
Slice cultures were washed 3 times in culture tubes and incubated for 4 min with either ACSF (control) or the OGD solution in an incubator at 35±1°C. Cultures were washed 3 times with ACSF and returned to culture medium containing 2.5 µg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma) and penicillin/streptomycin (1∶500; Sigma). After 48 h, cultures were photographed with constant settings using a CoolSNAPK4 camera (Roper Scientific) mounted on an Axiophot microscope (excitation 546 nm, emission >590 nm, Zeiss). Images were captured using the same acquisition parameters and visualized with MCID Elite 7.0 software (MCID), blind to the treatment group. Images were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH) by drawing and positioning a circle of 6000 pixels (diameter of about 0.1 mm) over the brightest region of CA1 pyramidal layers. The normalized change in average intensity was calculated by subtracting background fluorescence.
Western blotting
Hippocampal slices were pooled by three and homogenized using a 26 G needle syringe in 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EDTA, 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma), 10% (v/v) glycerol (Sigma), protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), phosphatase inhibitor cocktails 1 and 2 (Sigma), 250 µM PMSF (Sigma), and 15 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma). 20 to 30 µg total protein were resolved on 8–10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (BioRad). Membranes were blocked (Rockland IR blocking buffer, Rockland), and incubated in primary antibodies (1∶1000): rabbit anti-mouse phospho-NMDAR2B Ser 1303 (Upstate), rabbit anti-mouse phospho-NMDAR2B Tyr1472 (Sigma), mouse anti-mouse NMDAR2B (Chemicon), rabbit anti-mouse phospho-CaMKIIα/β Thr286/287 (Upstate), rabbit anti-mouse CaMKIIα (Sigma), mouse anti-mouse phospho-CREB Ser133 (Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-mouse CREB (Upstate), and mouse anti-mouse β-actin (Sigma). Membranes were incubated in secondary antibodies (1∶10000): goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IRDye 680, goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IRDye 800 (Li-Cor Biosciences). Band intensity was determined and quantified using an Odyssey IR scanner (Li-Cor Biosciences). The phospho-protein signal was normalized to the corresponding protein signal, and β-actin was used as a loading control. Values from PP1α-expressing and control cultures subjected to OGD were normalized to values from control cultures where OGD was not induced.
Co-immunoprecipitation
Protein samples from whole hippocampus lysates were prepared by homogenization in 500 µl sterile-filtered 50 mM Tris, 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40 containing proteinase and phosphatase inhibitors (1∶100; Sigma), followed by centrifugation for 15 min at 14,000 rpm at 4°C and collection of the supernatant. After 60 to 90 min incubation with 1–2 µg of the corresponding antibody, 20 µl of BSA-precleared pansorbin-protein A beads (Calbiochem) were added for 45 min at 4°C. The immune complexes were spun at 8000 rpm for 3 min, washed in high-salt homogenization buffer (containing 50 mM Tris, 500 mM NaCl and 1% NP-40) and regular homogenization buffer. Samples were loaded on a 8% SDS gel and analyzed (see Western blotting). IP antibodies used were rabbit polyclonal anti-PP1α (Chemicon) and rabbit anti-IgG (Sigma) as control, and blotting antibodies were rabbit polyclonal anti-NR2B (Millipore) and mouse monoclonal anti-NR1 C-terminal (Upstate).
NR2B phosphorylation assay
The GST-NR2B fusion peptide including the NR2B C-terminal region tail (residues 1221–1501) was expressed in E.Coli from the pGEX-NR2B vector [29] and purified according to Amersham Biosciences protocol. In vitro NR2B phosphorylation/dephosphorylation was conducted using purified recombinant CaMKII and PP1 enzymes (New England Biolabs), according to supplied protocols. Products were loaded on a 8–10% SDS gel and phosphorylation was analyzed (see Western blotting).
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean normalized to baseline or control ± SEM. Paired Student's t-tests were used to compare non-normalized data. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05(*), p≤0.01(**) and p≤0.001(***).
Results
PP1α overexpression in CA1 hippocampal neurons
To address the importance of PP1 in NMDAR-dependent excitotoxicity in the adult hippocampus, we conditionally expressed PP1α in CA1 hippocampal neurons using a lentivirus approach. We chose CA1 neurons because they are highly vulnerable to excitotoxicity [30]. We generated vectors expressing PP1α alone (PP1α) or PP1α fused to enhanced green fluorescent protein (PP1α-EGFP) under the control of the neuron-specific human prion (hPrion) promoter ( Figure 1a ). These vectors were used to overexpress PP1 in organotypic hippocampal slices. In the slices injected with the PP1α-EGFP vector, EGFP/NeuN co-staining confirmed the neuronal specificity of PP1α expression, and showed that expression is homogenous and mainly distributed across CA1 neurons but is also present in CA3 and dentate gyrus neurons ( Figure 1b ). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR showed that the PP1α vector increased PP1α mRNA expression in the hippocampus by 36±11% ( Figure 1c ). PP1α protein shows a somato-dendritic distribution with enrichment in dendritic spines (Figure S1a and Supporting Methods S1), suggesting its presence at glutamatergic synapses. In contrast, the other major catalytic isoform PP1γ is enriched in the nucleus (Figure S1b and Supporting Methods S1).
PP1α overexpression reduces [Ca2+]i overload and prevents cell death during excitotoxicity
A critical step in the mechanisms of excitotoxicity is the over-activation of NMDARs and the resulting overload in intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) [31]. Because the functions and properties of the NMDAR depend on its subunit composition [4], [5], it is important to first determine which receptor subtype contributes to the increased Ca2+ influx following excitotoxic insult. We used oxygen/glucose deprivation (OGD) as paradigm to induce excitotoxicity in hippocampal neurons and examined the Ca2+ influx and NMDAR subunit composition by Ca2+ imaging and electrophysiological recording. Post-synaptic Ca2+ influx was made NMDAR-dependent by blocking alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and kainate receptors, γ-aminobutyric acidA (GABAA) receptors, and voltage-gated Na+ channels, and was visualized by loading individual CA1 pyramidal neurons with the high-affinity indicator Oregon Green 488 BAPTA-1 (OGB-1). This revealed that somatic [Ca2+]i was rapidly and transiently increased during OGD, consistent with previous reports [32] ( Figure 2a,b ). Blockade of NR2B-containing NMDARs with ifenprodil [33] significantly attenuated this increase, and reduced the overall Ca2+ load by about 70% (+/−9%), suggesting the contribution of the NR2B subunit. This effect was specific to NR2B and did not involve NR2A since blockade of NR2A-containing NMDARs with 0.1 µM NVP-AAM077 [34] had no effect on [Ca2+]i. It reduced basal NMDAR-mediated responses by about 70% (data not shown), suggesting a efficient inhibition of NR2A responses with little effect on NR2B [35].
We then assessed whether PP1α contributes to the regulation of Ca2+ influx by NR2B-containing NMDARs, using hippocampal slices in which PP1α was either overexpressed or inhibited. We found that PP1α overexpression reduces the maximal [Ca2+]i rise and Ca2+ load in hippocampal neurons, and that the reduction was comparable to that observed with ifenprodil. Conversely, PP1α inhibition, achieved by transgenic expression of an active PP1 inhibitor (I-1) [36], (Figure S2a and Supporting Methods S1), prolonged [Ca2+]i rise and increased [Ca2+]i load ( 37+/−9%) in CA1 neurons subjected to OGD (Figure S2b and Supporting Methods S1). These results strongly suggest that PP1α is involved in the bidirectional regulation of Ca2+ influx through NMDARs.
Since in excitotoxicity, Ca2+ overload is often associated with delayed neuronal death [31], we next examined whether ifenprodil or PP1α overexpression diminish cellular damage. To visualize cell death, we used propidium iodide (PI), a marker that rapidly penetrates cells with damaged membrane and fluoresces upon binding to DNA. A significant increase in PI staining (2.3 fold+/−0.2) was observed in pyramidal layers in area CA1–CA3 and in dentate gyrus 48 hours after OGD challenge, indicating massive neuronal death ( Figure 2c,d ). Cell death was strongly reduced in all hippocampal areas including CA1 but also CA3 and dentate gyrus by both ifenprodil and PP1α overexpression as shown by a lack of increase in PI staining in these conditions. Neuroprotection in area CA3 and dentate gyrus likely result from PP1α overexpression in CA1 region. Indeed, cell death following excitotoxic insult is known to initially affect CA1 pyramidal cells in an acute phase followed by delayed damage in area CA3 and dentate gyrus [30], [37]. The protecting effect of PP1 in area CA1 may therefore impact area CA3 and the dentate gyrus after a delay. Together, these findings strongly suggest that [Ca2+]i overload during OGD is largely mediated by NR2B-containing NMDARs, and that such overload and the resulting cellular damage can be prevented by PP1α.
NR2B Ser1303 phosphorylation contributes to [Ca2+]i overload and is prevented by PP1α overexpression or CaMKII inhibition
Changes in intracellular [Ca2+]i are known to modulate Ca2+-dependent signaling pathways and alter the activity of Ca2+-activated enzymes, in particular Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII). CaMKII is a serine/threonine protein kinase that can autophosphorylate on several residues in the presence of Ca2+ [38]. Autophosphorylation on Thr286 confers autonomous Ca2+-independent activity to the enzyme [38], [39], [40], and promotes its association with the PSD [41]. We examined whether CaMKII Thr286 phosphorylation is modulated by OGD in our experimental conditions, and whether PP1α influences this autophosphorylation. Western blot analyses revealed that Thr286 phosphorylation was significantly increased 1 min after OGD (1.4 fold+/−0.1), a time point that corresponds to maximum [Ca2+]i peak, then returned to baseline within 16 min in control slices ( Figure 3a ). This effect was specific to CaMKIIα phosphorylation and was not accompanied with any change in the total level of the protein. Since in the PSD, CaMKIIα can be dephosphorylated by PP1 [41], we also investigated the effect of PP1α overexpression on Thr286 phosphorylation. We observed that CaMKII Thr286 phosphorylation was significantly reduced by PP1α overexpression 1 min after OGD ( Figure 3a ). PP1α overexpression did not induce any change in CaMKII Thr286 phosphorylation.
Since the toxic [Ca2+]i overload during OGD is largely mediated by NR2B-containing NMDARs ( Figure 2a,b ), and correlates with CaMKIIα activation by Thr286 phosphorylation, we next examined the link between CaMKIIα and NR2B-containing NMDARs. We determined whether Ser1303 on NR2B, a site phosphorylated by CaMKIIα [15], is modulated by OGD. Western blot analyses showed that Ser1303 phosphorylation was significantly increased 1 min after OGD (3.8 fold+/−0.9) and returned to baseline within 16 min in control slices, without any change in the total level of NR2B ( Figure 3b ). Similar to CaMKII phosphorylation, this increase correlated with the maximum [Ca2+]i peak, suggesting a link between NR2B Ser1303 phosphorylation, CaMKII phosphorylation and Ca2+ entry. Consistently, we observed that the increase in NR2B phosphorylation was abolished by KN-93, a specific CaMKII inhibitor ( Figure 3b ). Furthermore, PP1α expression significantly reduced the level of phosphorylated NR2B Ser1303 1 min after OGD ( Figure 3b ), while no effect was observed in non-OGD conditions.
To confirm the specific effect of NR2B Ser1303 phosphorylation on Ca2+ overload, we next tested whether a loss of this residue abolishes such overload. We co-expressed a native (NR2B S1303 WT) or mutated NR2B subunit carrying a Ser1303 to Ala1303 substitution (NR2B S1303A) that prevents phosphorylation, with a highly sensitive Ca2+ indicator [28] (TN-XXL) using biolistic transfection in organotypic hippocampal slices. The analysis of isolated post-synaptic NMDAR-dependent Ca2+ influx in CA1 pyramidal neurons expressing native NR2B revealed a rapid and transient two-fold increase in somatic [Ca2+]i during OGD ( Figure 4a, b ). This increase was prevented by blockade of NR2B Ser1303 phosphorylation in slices expressing NR2B S1303A. The effect of NR2B S1303A expression was not resulting from incorrect trafficking to the surface as observed in transfected Neuro-2a cells (Figure S3 and Supporting Methods S1). Moreover, there was no significant difference in TN-XXL expression when comparing cells transfected with the different NR2B variants (Figure S4 and Supporting Methods S1). These data overall strongly suggest that Ser1303 phosphorylation is required for OGD-induced Ca2+ overload.
Following the demonstration that OGD-induced Ca2+ overload and the resulting cellular damage are prevented by PP1α ( Figure 2 ), we next hypothesized that PP1α mediates its neuroprotective effect by dephosphorylating Ser1303. To test this hypothesis, we determined whether PP1α associates with NR2B, and whether this correlates with NR2B dephosphorylation. Co-immunoprecipitation assays in mouse hippocampal extracts using anti-PP1α, anti-NR2B or -NR1 antibodies revealed that PP1α does interact with NR2B and NR1 subunits ( Figure 4c ). These results are in agreement with a previous report showing that PP1 forms a complex with the NMDAR [16]. Further, in the presence of a purified NR2B fragment (aa 1221–1482) phosphorylated by CaMKII, PP1α was able to fully dephosphorylate Ser1303 within 30 min in vitro ( Figure 4d ). These results provide further evidence for a direct effect of PP1α on NR2B Ser1303 [42].
NR2B Ser1303 phosphorylation alters NMDAR functions and CREB-dependent gene expression
NR2B Ser1303 phosphorylation is associated with increased [Ca2+]i, and Ca2+ is known to modulate NMDAR activity. Therefore, we examined whether NMDAR currents are altered by OGD. Isolated post-synaptic NMDAR currents were induced by pressure application of NMDA onto CA1 neurons and recorded in voltage clamp whole-cell configuration. In control slices, NMDAR currents progressively increased during the 4-min OGD and reached a plateau at about 168% of baseline, 2 min after the end of OGD ( Figure 5a, b ). This increase was stable (over 25 min), indicating a persistent potentiation of NMDAR currents by OGD, consistent with previous reports [37]. While NVP-AAM077 had no effect on the potentiation of NMDAR currents, ifenprodil abolished this potentiation and induced a full recovery of NMDAR currents a few minutes after OGD ( Figure 5a, b ). These results confirm that NR2B underlies the prolonged potentiation of NMDAR currents induced by excitotoxicity.
Our previous work has shown that PP1 influences the recovery of fEPSPs from OGD in hippocampus. Its inhibition by specific inhibitors or after induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) prevents fEPSPs recovery while, in contrast, its activation by induction of long-term depression (LTD) restores fEPSPs [21]. Since PP1 contributes to the regulation of NMDARs [19] and blocks excitotoxic [Ca2+]i overload, we next examined whether it has a positive effect on fEPSPs recovery and NMDAR currents after OGD. When PP1α was expressed in hippocampal slices, the transient decrease in fEPSPs and increase in NMDAR currents induced by OGD were abolished, and both fEPSPs and NMDAR currents fully recovered ( Figure 5a,b , Figure S5 and Supporting Methods S1). Further, consistent with the implication of CaMKII in [Ca2+]i overload, CaMKII inhibition by KN-93 prior to OGD significantly reduced the potentiation of NMDARs currents, and led to a full recovery of these currents ( Figure 5a,b ).
Since protein tyrosine kinases of the Src family are involved in the regulation of NMDAR functions [43] and are associated with excitotoxicity [44], [45], we also investigated Tyr phosphorylation of NR2B. We examined Tyr1472, a residue phosphorylated by Src kinases and associated with NMDAR stabilization at the membrane [46]. Tyr1472 phosphorylation was increased by 1.5 fold (+/−0.3) 1 min after OGD and by 1.9 fold (+/−0.5) after 16 min (Figure S6a). This increase was prevented by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor PP2 and by CaMKII inhibition with KN-93, while no effect was observed in non-OGD conditions. These results confirm the involvement of Tyr phosphorylation of NR2B in OGD and suggest a potential link between Tyr and Ser/Thr phosphorylation pathways.
Finally, since excitotoxicity is associated with disruption of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)-dependent pathways in CA1 neurons [47], [48], we examined whether CREB phosphorylation on Ser133 and CREB-dependent gene expression are altered by OGD. On Western blots, we observed that CREB phosphorylation on Ser133 was significantly decreased 1 min after OGD (by 0.47 fold+/−0.09) and returned to baseline within 16 min (Figure S6b). This decrease was prevented by CaMKII inhibition with KN-93, consistent with the fact that it occurred at the same time point (1 minute after OGD) as CaMKII-mediated NR2B phosphorylation and [Ca2+]i overload. Further, it was accompanied by reduced expression of the CREB target genes, pro-survival marker B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and the immediate early gene c-fos [49], about 20 minutes after OGD (0.86 fold+/−0.02 and 0.76 fold+/−0.07). Importantly, this reduction was fully reversed by PP1α overexpression, confirming the critical role of PP1α in the reversal of the effects of excitotoxicity (Figure S6c).
Discussion
This study identifies a novel mechanism for the control of the switch between cell death and cell survival pathways in hippocampal neurons that involves NR2B-containing NMDARs and the protein phosphatase PP1α. The data demonstrate that the selective phosphorylation of NR2B on Ser1303 by CaMKII is an initial trigger for intraneuronal Ca2+ overload during excitotoxicity and that dephosphorylation of this residue by PP1α confers neuroprotection. They further show that the effect of PP1α is mediated by a normalization of NMDAR currents followed by a decrease in Ca2+ overload, a restoration of CREB-dependent gene expression, and prevention of delayed neuronal cell death.
These findings are of primary importance for the understanding of the mechanisms of regulation of the NMDAR in adult hippocampal neurons because they newly reveal how the Ser/Thr protein phosphatase PP1α regulates NMDAR functions by acting on a single residue (Ser1303) located on NR2B. Protein phosphorylation is recognized to be a critical regulation mechanism of NMDAR functions, but the residues and enzymes involved in the adult hippocampus have to date only been partially identified. This is particularly true for Ser/Thr phosphorylation, which is known to occur on Ser1303 and 1323 on NR2B and to involve DAPK1, CaMKII, and PKC [14], [15], [17]. However, the reversal of phosphorylation by protein phosphatases remains unclear. The identification of PP1α as a specific phosphatase of Ser1303 on NR2B provides new insight onto the modes of regulation of the NMDAR in hippocampal neurons [20], [50]. It will be of interest in the future to assess the mechanisms by which Ser1303 phosphorylation/dephosphorylation modulates NMDAR functions, this might involve conformational changes [5], a change in NMDAR channel open probability [19], and/or reduced coupling with downstream signaling pathways.
The fact that PP1α co-localizes with NR2B and acts directly on this subunit suggests that it is strategically positioned at the NMDAR to initiate downstream signaling. There, it appears to negatively modulate pathways regulating intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis, and Ca2+-dependent enzymes such as CaMKIIα. The mechanisms recruited to limit Ca2+ entry are not known but may involve L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels [51], Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors [52], [53], and/or acid-sensing ion channels [54], which may be overactivated by CaMKIIα-mediated phosphorylation. PP1α may also favor neuroprotective signaling cascades involving group I metabotropic glutamate receptors α (mGluR1α), PI3 kinase or Akt, and/or perhaps limits mGluR1α-dependent Ca2+ release from intracellular stores that participate to excitotoxic Ca2+ overload [55].
Signaling cascades downstream of NMDARs also contribute to pro-apoptotic programs in ischemic conditions. Activation of NR2B-containing NMDARs by CaMKIIα triggers a Ca2+ imbalance that dramatically alters cellular properties and leads to delayed cell death. This at the same time also lowers PP1 activity [21]. Consistently, we demonstrate that increased PP1α activity counteracts the Ca2+ overload similarly to CaMKIIα inhibition and NR2B-containing NMDAR blockade. Further, the inhibition of PP1 prolongs Ca2+ influx, suggesting that endogenous PP1 can restore a normal concentration of intracellular Ca2+ upon excitotoxic insult. In vivo, the mechanisms leading to PP1 activation or inhibition in the hippocampus are not fully understood but may involve inhibitory targeting partners or inhibitors such as inhibitor-1 [56].
The contribution of NMDARs to excitotoxicity contrasts with the positive role of the receptor in normal excitatory neurotransmission, synaptic plasticity, and memory processes [57]. Such dual functions may be mediated by different populations of NMDARs coupled to distinct interacting partners and/or signaling cascades. NMDAR-dependent pro-death signaling involves NR2B coupling to the stress-activated protein kinase p38 in neurons [58]. Blockade of NR2B and p38 interaction reduces excitotoxic neuronal death without affecting NMDAR-mediated Ca2+ influx and synaptic plasticity, suggesting a specific role of NR2B-containing NMDAR downstream signaling in neuronal death.
For some forms of synaptic plasticity such as LTP, NR2B-containing NMDARs associate with CaMKII following the recruitment of the kinase to the receptor [59]. In contrast, synaptic depression such as LTD induces the recruitment of PP1 to NMDARs [20], [21], most likely to extrasynaptic NR2B-containing NMDARs which are negatively regulated during LTD in the hippocampus [60]. Together with these findings, the present data suggest that PP1 may promote LTD by lowering NR2B-containing NMDAR activity, and operate extrasynaptically [61]. Finally, these findings strengthen previous reports showing that signaling through extrasynaptic NMDARs promotes cell death [48], and provide novel perspectives for its blockade by PP1. They underscore the potential of pharmacological approaches targeting protein phosphatases rather than approaches based on NMDAR antagonists, which have severe side effects [62], for the treatment of excitotoxicity in pathologies such as ischemic stroke. These data together with a previous report showing that PP1 inhibition improves memory in aged mice [36] support the therapeutic potential of PP1 modulation in brain disorders and aging.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank L. Rietschin and D. Göckeritz-Dujmovic for slice cultures, Yves P. Auberson (Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research; Switzerland) for the gift of NVP-AAMO77, and colleagues who kindly provided constructs: D. Trono for pLVPRT-tTR-KRAB and pLVPT-tTR-KRAB, S. Shenolikar for pEGFP-C1-PP1α, R.L. Huganir for pGEX-NR2B, D. Lynch for pRK7-NR2B, O. Griesbeck for TN-XXL, P. Scheiffele for GFP-NR2B, and A. Triller for Homer-mCherry. We thank U. Gerber, J. Ster, G. Coiret and J. Gräff for helpful discussions, and B. Gähwiler for reading the manuscript.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: Funding by the National Center for Competence in Research “Neural Plasticity and Repair”, the University of Zürich, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, The Human Frontier Science Program, The Swiss National Foundation, Slack-Gyr Foundation, and Bitterlin Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Arundine M, Tymianski M. Molecular mechanisms of glutamate-dependent neurodegeneration in ischemia and traumatic brain injury. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61:657–668. doi: 10.1007/s00018-003-3319-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ghosh A, Greenberg ME. Calcium signaling in neurons: molecular mechanisms and cellular consequences. Science. 1995;268:239–247. doi: 10.1126/science.7716515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stanika RI, Pivovarova NB, Brantner CA, Watts CA, Winters CA, et al. Coupling diverse routes of calcium entry to mitochondrial dysfunction and glutamate excitotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:9854–9859. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903546106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krupp JJ, Vissel B, Heinemann SF, Westbrook GL. Calcium-dependent inactivation of recombinant N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors is NR2 subunit specific. Mol Pharmacol. 1996;50:1680–1688. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dingledine R, Borges K, Bowie D, Traynelis SF. The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:7–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lein ES, Hawrylycz MJ, Ao N, Ayres M, Bensinger A, et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature. 2007;445:168–176. doi: 10.1038/nature05453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tovar KR, Westbrook GL. The incorporation of NMDA receptors with a distinct subunit composition at nascent hippocampal synapses in vitro. J Neurosci. 1999;19:4180–4188. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-10-04180.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Thomas CG, Miller AJ, Westbrook GL. Synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptor NR2 subunits in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:1727–1734. doi: 10.1152/jn.00771.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang SJ, Steijaert MN, Lau D, Schutz G, Delucinge-Vivier C, et al. Decoding NMDA receptor signaling: identification of genomic programs specifying neuronal survival and death. Neuron. 2007;53:549–562. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fellin T, Pascual O, Gobbo S, Pozzan T, Haydon PG, et al. Neuronal synchrony mediated by astrocytic glutamate through activation of extrasynaptic NMDA receptors. Neuron. 2004;43:729–743. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jourdain P, Bergersen LH, Bhaukaurally K, Bezzi P, Santello M, et al. Glutamate exocytosis from astrocytes controls synaptic strength. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:331–339. doi: 10.1038/nn1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cheng C, Fass DM, Reynolds IJ. Emergence of excitotoxicity in cultured forebrain neurons coincides with larger glutamate-stimulated [Ca(2+)](i) increases and NMDA receptor mRNA levels. Brain Res. 1999;849:97–108. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01995-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cull-Candy S, Brickley S, Farrant M. NMDA receptor subunits: diversity, development and disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001;11:327–335. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00215-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tu W, Xu X, Peng L, Zhong X, Zhang W, et al. DAPK1 interaction with NMDA receptor NR2B subunits mediates brain damage in stroke. Cell. 140:222–234. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Omkumar RV, Kiely MJ, Rosenstein AJ, Min KT, Kennedy MB. Identification of a phosphorylation site for calcium/calmodulindependent protein kinase II in the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:31670–31678. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.49.31670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Westphal RS, Tavalin SJ, Lin JW, Alto NM, Fraser ID, et al. Regulation of NMDA receptors by an associated phosphatase-kinase signaling complex. Science. 1999;285:93–96. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5424.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liao GY, Wagner DA, Hsu MH, Leonard JP. Evidence for direct protein kinase-C mediated modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor current. Mol Pharmacol. 2001;59:960–964. doi: 10.1124/mol.59.5.960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang YT, Salter MW. Regulation of NMDA receptors by tyrosine kinases and phosphatases. Nature. 1994;369:233–235. doi: 10.1038/369233a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang LY, Orser BA, Brautigan DL, MacDonald JF. Regulation of NMDA receptors in cultured hippocampal neurons by protein phosphatases 1 and 2A. Nature. 1994;369:230–232. doi: 10.1038/369230a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Morishita W, Connor JH, Xia H, Quinlan EM, Shenolikar S, et al. Regulation of synaptic strength by protein phosphatase 1. Neuron. 2001;32:1133–1148. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00554-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hedou GF, Koshibu K, Farinelli M, Kilic E, Gee CE, et al. Protein phosphatase 1-dependent bidirectional synaptic plasticity controls ischemic recovery in the adult brain. J Neurosci. 2008;28:154–162. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4109-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Newell DW, Barth A, Papermaster V, Malouf AT. Glutamate and non-glutamate receptor mediated toxicity caused by oxygen and glucose deprivation in organotypic hippocampal cultures. J Neurosci. 1995;15:7702–7711. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-11-07702.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Szulc J, Wiznerowicz M, Sauvain MO, Trono D, Aebischer P. A versatile tool for conditional gene expression and knockdown. Nat Methods. 2006;3:109–116. doi: 10.1038/nmeth846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ceulemans H, Vulsteke V, De Maeyer M, Tatchell K, Stalmans W, et al. Binding of the concave surface of the Sds22 superhelix to the alpha 4/alpha 5/alpha 6-triangle of protein phosphatase-1. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:47331–47337. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206838200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gahwiler BH, Capogna M, Debanne D, McKinney RA, Thompson SM. Organotypic slice cultures: a technique has come of age. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20:471–477. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01122-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Helmchen F, Imoto K, Sakmann B. Ca2+ buffering and action potential-evoked Ca2+ signaling in dendrites of pyramidal neurons. Biophys J. 1996;70:1069–1081. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79653-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mank M, Santos AF, Direnberger S, Mrsic-Flogel TD, Hofer SB, et al. A genetically encoded calcium indicator for chronic in vivo two-photon imaging. Nat Methods. 2008;5:805–811. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chung HJ, Huang YH, Lau LF, Huganir RL. Regulation of the NMDA receptor complex and trafficking by activity-dependent phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit PDZ ligand. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10248–10259. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0546-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Strasser U, Fischer G. Quantitative measurement of neuronal degeneration in organotypic hippocampal cultures after combined oxygen/glucose deprivation. J Neurosci Methods. 1995;57:177–186. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(94)00147-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lipton P. Ischemic cell death in brain neurons. Physiol Rev. 1999;79:1431–1568. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schubert P, Keller F, Nakamura Y, Rudolphi K. The use of ion-sensitive electrodes and fluorescence imaging in hippocampal slices for studying pathological changes of intracellular Ca2+ regulation. J Neural Transm. 1994;Suppl 44:73–85. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9350-1_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Williams K. Ifenprodil discriminates subtypes of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor: selectivity and mechanisms at recombinant heteromeric receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 1993;44:851–859. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Auberson YP, Allgeier H, Bischoff S, Lingenhoehl K, Moretti R, et al. 5-Phosphonomethylquinoxalinediones as competitive NMDA receptor antagonists with a preference for the human 1A/2A, rather than 1A/2B receptor composition. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2002;12:1099–1102. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(02)00074-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bartlett TE, Bannister NJ, Collett VJ, Dargan SL, Massey PV, et al. Differential roles of NR2A and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in LTP and LTD in the CA1 region of two-week old rat hippocampus. Neuropharmacology. 2007;52:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Genoux D, Haditsch U, Knobloch M, Michalon A, Storm D, et al. Protein phosphatase 1 is a molecular constraint on learning and memory. Nature. 2002;418:970–975. doi: 10.1038/nature00928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gee CE, Benquet P, Raineteau O, Rietschin L, Kirbach SW, et al. NMDA receptors and the differential ischemic vulnerability of hippocampal neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:2595–2603. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04786.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Miller SG, Patton BL, Kennedy MB. Sequences of autophosphorylation sites in neuronal type II CaM kinase that control Ca2(+)-independent activity. Neuron. 1988;1:593–604. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90109-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schworer H, Kilbinger H. Enhancement of guinea-pig intestinal peristalsis by blockade of muscarinic M1-receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1988;93:715–720. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb10330.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Thiel G, Czernik AJ, Gorelick F, Nairn AC, Greengard P. Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II: identification of threonine-286 as the autophosphorylation site in the alpha subunit associated with the generation of Ca2+-independent activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:6337–6341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Strack S, Barban MA, Wadzinski BE, Colbran RJ. Differential inactivation of postsynaptic density-associated and soluble Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II by protein phosphatases 1 and 2A. J Neurochem. 1997;68:2119–2128. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.68052119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Raveendran R, Devi Suma Priya S, Mayadevi M, Steephan M, Santhoshkumar TR, et al. Phosphorylation status of the NR2B subunit of NMDA receptor regulates its interaction with calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. J Neurochem. 2009;110:92–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Salter MW, Kalia LV. Src kinases: a hub for NMDA receptor regulation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:317–328. doi: 10.1038/nrn1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Camacho A, Montiel T, Massieu L. Sustained metabolic inhibition induces an increase in the content and phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and a decrease in glutamate transport in the rat hippocampus in vivo. Neuroscience. 2007;145:873–886. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.12.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lennmyr F, Ericsson A, Gerwins P, Akterin S, Ahlstrom H, et al. Src family kinase-inhibitor PP2 reduces focal ischemic brain injury. Acta Neurol Scand. 2004;110:175–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2004.00306.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Prybylowski K, Chang K, Sans N, Kan L, Vicini S, et al. The synaptic localization of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors is controlled by interactions with PDZ proteins and AP-2. Neuron. 2005;47:845–857. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Walton M, Sirimanne E, Williams C, Gluckman P, Dragunow M. The role of the cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) in hypoxic-ischemic brain damage and repair. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1996;43:21–29. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(96)00144-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hardingham GE, Fukunaga Y, Bading H. Extrasynaptic NMDARs oppose synaptic NMDARs by triggering CREB shut-off and cell death pathways. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:405–414. doi: 10.1038/nn835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kitagawa K. CREB and cAMP response element-mediated gene expression in the ischemic brain. Febs J. 2007;274:3210–3217. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05890.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lieberman DN, Mody I. Regulation of NMDA channel function by endogenous Ca(2+)-dependent phosphatase. Nature. 1994;369:235–239. doi: 10.1038/369235a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fields RD, Lee PR, Cohen JE. Temporal integration of intracellular Ca2+ signaling networks in regulating gene expression by action potentials. Cell Calcium. 2005;37:433–442. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2005.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Liu S, Lau L, Wei J, Zhu D, Zou S, et al. Expression of Ca(2+)-permeable AMPA receptor channels primes cell death in transient forebrain ischemia. Neuron. 2004;43:43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Barria A, Muller D, Derkach V, Griffith LC, Soderling TR. Regulatory phosphorylation of AMPA-type glutamate receptors by CaM-KII during long-term potentiation. Science. 1997;276:2042–2045. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5321.2042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gao J, Duan B, Wang DG, Deng XH, Zhang GY, et al. Coupling between NMDA receptor and acid-sensing ion channel contributes to ischemic neuronal death. Neuron. 2005;48:635–646. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Xu W, Wong TP, Chery N, Gaertner T, Wang YT, et al. Calpain-mediated mGluR1alpha truncation: a key step in excitotoxicity. Neuron. 2007;53:399–412. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Blitzer RD, Connor JH, Brown GP, Wong T, Shenolikar S, et al. Gating of CaMKII by cAMP-regulated protein phosphatase activity during LTP. Science. 1998;280:1940–1942. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5371.1940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lee YS, Silva AJ. The molecular and cellular biology of enhanced cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:126–140. doi: 10.1038/nrn2572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Soriano FX, Martel MA, Papadia S, Vaslin A, Baxter P, et al. Specific targeting of pro-death NMDA receptor signals with differing reliance on the NR2B PDZ ligand. J Neurosci. 2008;28:10696–10710. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1207-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Barria A, Malinow R. NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptic plasticity by regulating binding to CaMKII. Neuron. 2005;48:289–301. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kollen M, Dutar P, Jouvenceau A. The magnitude of hippocampal long term depression depends on the synaptic location of activated NR2-containing N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Neuroscience. 2008;154:1308–1317. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.04.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Martel MA, Wyllie DJ, Hardingham GE. In developing hippocampal neurons, NR2B-containing N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) can mediate signaling to neuronal survival and synaptic potentiation, as well as neuronal death. Neuroscience. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ikonomidou C, Turski L. Why did NMDA receptor antagonists fail clinical trials for stroke and traumatic brain injury? Lancet Neurol. 2002;1:383–386. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00164-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.