Table 1. Simulation results and analytical predictions for viability after 50 generations of no management or equal family contribution.

												Equal family contributions
								No management:Mean viability				Mean viability
Case	λ	E(s)	Shape	E(h)	δ	N	δ*	Neutral	IPb	FMc	Sd	Neutral	IPb	FMc	Sd	ΔLs at t = 50a
a	2	0.01	0.07	0.35	3.75	25	0.55	0.09	0.25	0.28	0.24	0.09	0.33	0.38	0.38	0.003
b	1	0.025	0.25	0.35	3.82	25	0.53	0.08	0.32	0.35	0.34	0.09	0.37	0.38	0.40	0.079
c	0.5	0.05	1.0	0.35	1.65	25	0.29	0.35	0.56	0.57	0.51	0.35	0.62	0.52	0.52	0.215
d	0.1	0.10	0.5	0.35	0.74	25	0.10	0.64	0.88	0.88	0.88	0.62	0.89	0.85	0.86	0.066
e	0.03	0.264	2.3	0.35	0.19	25	0.04	0.89	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.89	0.97	0.95	0.95	0.024 (0.092)
h	0.03	0.264	2.3	0.20	0.51	25	0.08	0.74	0.96	0.97	0.97	0.72	0.95	0.93	0.95	0.024 (0.042)
i	0.5	0.05	1.0	0.35	1.66	100	0.62	0.69	0.76	0.83	0.84	0.69	0.84	0.67	0.69	0.255
j	0.03	0.264	2.3	0.20	0.50	100	0.14	0.90	0.96	0.98	0.98	0.89	0.97	0.95	0.96	0.024 (0.050)
Mean squared error for FM										0.00070				0.00017
Mean squared error for García-Dorado 2008 “full” predictions										0.00089				0.00079

Results are given for different cases, each characterized by the effective sizes after population shrinkage (N), the deleterious mutation rate (λ), the mean and shape parameter of the gamma distribution for s (E(s) and “Shape”) and the average dominance coefficient (E(h). δ and δ* are, respectively, the inbreeding depression rates at the ancestral an the new MSD balance under no management.

^aIncrease of the relative expressed segregating load ascribed to EFC. Regular font: bounded prediction computed from Equation B2; Italic font: unbounded prediction computed from Equation B1a, given only when larger than the MS bound.

^bInbreeding-Purge predictions.

^cFull-Model predictions.

^dSimulation results published by Fernández and Caballero (2001).