Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2012 Apr;80(4):1418–1423. doi: 10.1128/IAI.06378-11

Identification of the Cellular Receptor of Clostridium spiroforme Toxin

Panagiotis Papatheodorou 1, Claudia Wilczek 1, Thilo Nölke 1, Gregor Guttenberg 1, Daniel Hornuss 1, Carsten Schwan 1, Klaus Aktories 1,
Editor: S R Blanke
PMCID: PMC3318402  PMID: 22252869

Abstract

Clostridium spiroforme produces the binary actin-ADP-ribosylating toxin CST (C. spiroforme toxin), which has been proposed to be responsible for diarrhea, enterocolitis, and eventually death, especially in rabbits. Here we report on the recombinant production of the enzyme component (CSTa) and the binding component (CSTb) of C. spiroforme toxin in Bacillus megaterium. By using the recombinant toxin components, we show that CST enters target cells via the lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR), which has been recently identified as the host cell receptor of the binary toxins Clostridium difficile transferase (CDT) and Clostridium perfringens iota toxin. Microscopic studies revealed that CST, but not the related Clostridium botulinum C2 toxin, colocalized with LSR during toxin uptake and traffic to endosomal compartments. Our findings indicate that CST shares LSR with C. difficile CDT and C. perfringens iota toxin as a host cell surface receptor.

INTRODUCTION

Clostridium spiroforme is frequently found in the digestive tracts of rabbits, where it is proposed to be responsible for severe diarrhea, enterocolitis, and eventually death of the host (7). The virulence of C. spiroforme strongly correlates with the production of an enterotoxin termed CST (C. spiroforme toxin) (6) that belongs to the family of clostridial iota-like binary toxins, including C. perfringens iota toxin and C. difficile transferase (CDT). CST is an A-B-type toxin, with an enzyme component (CSTa) harboring mono(ADP-ribosyl)transferase activity and a separate binding component (CSTb) that forms heptamers, binds to target cells, and is responsible for the cell entry of the enzyme component. After endocytosis and traffic to acidic endosomes, the heptameric binding component forms pores in endosomal membranes, which allow the translocation of the enzyme component into the cytosol of target cells (1, 2). In the cytosol, CSTa ADP-ribosylates G-actin, thereby leading to actin depolymerization and disruption of microfilaments (18, 19, 21).

The binding components of binary actin-ADP-ribosylating toxins have significant similarity with the protective antigen (PA), which is the binding component of anthrax toxin (25). Structural studies of anthrax toxin were most instrumental for the understanding of the mechanisms underlying the cellular uptake of binary actin-ADP-ribosylating toxins. All these binding components are 80- to 100-kDa proteins and consist of 4 domains. Domain 1 is involved in proteolytic toxin activation. Cleavage of an ∼20-kDa N-terminal peptide of domain 1 allows heptamerization, which is supported mainly by domain 3. Domain 2 is involved in membrane insertion, which occurs at the low pH of endosomes and depends on the formation of a beta-barrel structure based on the structural rearrangement of domain 2. Domain 4 appears to be involved in receptor binding. This domain of CST has similarity with the binding components of iota-like binary actin ADP-ribosylating toxins but is unrelated to the respective domains of C2 toxin or PA.

Recently, recombinant clostridial proteins (e.g., clostridial protein toxins) have been successfully expressed in Bacillus megaterium. This system was extremely instrumental for expression of members of the family of large glucosylating clostridial toxins, which possess a mass of 250 to 308 kDa and are notoriously poorly expressed in Escherichia coli (22). We previously employed this procedure for recombinant production of the clostridial toxins C. sordellii lethal toxin, C. novyi alpha-toxin, and C. difficile transferase (11, 17, 20). The current study describes the usefulness of the B. megaterium expression system for recombinant production of CSTa and CSTb. The availability of both toxin components enabled us to elucidate the target cell receptor of CST. We recently identified the lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR) as the target molecule for binding and internalization of the clostridial binary toxins C. difficile transferase and C. perfringens iota toxin (16). Here, we demonstrate that C. spiroforme toxin also uses the LSR for target cell entry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell cultivation.

H1-HeLa and CaCo-2 cells were grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (12 mM l-glutamine) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), penicillin (4 mM), streptomycin (4 mM), 1% nonessential amino acids (NEA), and for CaCo-2 cells only, 1% sodium pyruvate (1 mM). Cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 under humidified conditions. Generation of H1-HeLa cells stably transduced with a retroviral element expressing an N-terminally FLAG-tagged version of LSR (FLAG-LSR) has been described elsewhere (16).

Cloning procedures.

For cloning of CSTa and CSTb into the B. megaterium expression vector pHIS1522 (MoBiTec, Göttingen, Germany), the genes were amplified by PCR and by using genomic DNA from C. spiroforme strain CS246 as a template. PCR of both genes was performed with oligonucleotides introducing a 5′-BsrGI (CSTa) or a 5′-Acc65I (CSTb) restriction site and a 3′-KpnI restriction site (both genes) and by omitting the stop codons. Subsequent ligation of both amplification products into BsrGI/KpnI-digested pHIS1522 resulted in the generation of pHIS1522/CSTa-6His and pHIS1522/CSTb-6His, respectively.

Expression and purification of CSTa and CSTb.

Briefly, B. megaterium protoplasts, transformed with either pHIS1522/CSTa-6His or pHIS1522/CSTb-6His (according to the manufacturer's instructions [MoBiTec, Göttingen, Germany]), were grown at 37°C in LB medium to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.8. Protein expression was induced by addition of 5% (wt/vol) xylose followed by incubation overnight at 16°C (CSTa) or at 29°C (CSTb). Cells were then harvested by centrifugation, and the pellet was suspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol, and 0.5 mM EDTA) supplemented with Complete protease inhibitor mix (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). After lysis of bacteria using a Microfluidizer (Microfluidics, Newton, MA) at 15,000 lb/in2, cell debris was removed by centrifugation (18,000 × g, 30 min, 4°C). The supernatant was applied to preequilibrated Ni-iminodiacetic acid (Ni-IDA) beads (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and incubated for 1 h at 4°C for binding of His-tagged proteins. The beads were then washed with buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, and 10% glycerol, and bound proteins were finally eluted with elution buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 500 mM imidazole, and 10% glycerol. Eventually, imidazole was removed from eluates by gel filtration chromatography using a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany) equilibrated with elution buffer without imidazole. Prior to use, CSTb was activated by treatment with 0.05 μg trypsin/μg of protein for 30 min on ice. Trypsin was inhibited by the addition of a 2-fold amount of trypsin inhibitor.

In vitro ADP-ribosylation assay.

After treatment with CST, cells were scraped into ice-cold ADP-ribosylation buffer (20 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], and Complete protease inhibitor mixture, pH 7.5) and lysed by passaging the cell suspension through a 26-gauge needle with a syringe 10 times. The cell debris was then removed by centrifugation (21,000 × g, 15 min, 4°C). Cytosolic extracts (30 μg of total protein) were incubated with 1 μg C2I and [32P]NAD for 60 min at 37°C, and the reaction was stopped by addition of Laemmli buffer. Radiolabeled actin was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.

Alexa dye labeling of purified proteins.

Following the manufacturer′s instructions, CSTb was labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 carboxylic acid succinimidyl ester (Invitrogen), and CDTb and C2I were labeled with Alexa Fluor 568 C5 maleimide (Invitrogen). Excess dye was removed with Micro Bio-Spin 6 columns (Bio-Rad Laboratories).

Microscopy.

Cell morphology was analyzed in wells directly by using an inverted microscope (Axiovert 25; Carl Zeiss). Actin and nuclear stainings were performed with tetramethyl rhodamine isocyanate (TRITC)-conjugated phalloidin and ProLong Gold antifade reagent containing 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), respectively, and analysis was done by fluorescence microscopy (Axiophot; Carl Zeiss). Confocal fluorescence microscopy was performed with an inverted microscope (Axiovert 200 M; Carl Zeiss) equipped with a 40× Plan-Apochromat objective, a spinning-disk head (Yokogawa) with emission filters, and a CoolSNAP-HQ2 digital camera (Roper Scientific). Alexa488/fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) signals and Alexa568/TRITC signals were detected by illuminating the specimen with 488-nm- and 561-nm-wavelength solid-state lasers, respectively. Images were processed with MetaMorph imaging software (Universal Imaging). For immunostaining of LSR, polyclonal rabbit anti-LSR antibody (sc-133765; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and secondary Alexa 568- or Alexa 488-conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) were used.

Crystal violet staining.

After CST treatment, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 min at 4°C, followed by staining of cells with 0.5% crystal violet solution (in 70% ethanol) for 30 min at 4°C. Excess staining solution was removed by washing the cells three times with H2O. Stained cells were air dried at room temperature before imaging.

FACS analysis.

Cells were detached from culture dishes by incubation with 10 mM EDTA in PBS and without trypsin to preserve cell surface proteins from degradation. The cell suspension was washed twice with PBS and kept on ice prior to addition of 10 μg activated, Alexa488-labeled CSTb per 100,000 cells in 1 ml PBS. After incubation for 15 min on ice, cells were washed twice with PBS and subjected to fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis using the BD FACSCalibur platform. Cell surface-bound fluorescence was detected with an argon-ion laser (488 nm) and the 530-nm-band-pass filter (FITC). Competition experiments were performed by preincubating cells for 5 min on ice with 50 μg activated, unlabeled CSTb or 50 μg bovine serum albumin (BSA) (including trypsin and trypsin inhibitor, as used for the activation of CSTb) per 1 million cells in 0.5 ml PBS prior to addition of 1 μg activated, Alexa488-labeled CSTb. Following two washings of cells with PBS, cell surface-bound fluorescence was detected by FACS analysis.

Other toxins used in this study.

The components of C. botulinum C2 toxin (C2I and C2II) and C. difficile transferase (CDTa and CDTb) were purified from Escherichia coli and Bacillus megaterium, respectively, as described elsewhere, and binding components (C2II and CDTb) were activated by protease treatment (3, 5, 20).

RESULTS

Cloning, expression, and cytotoxic effect of recombinant C. spiroforme toxin produced in B. megaterium.

The genes encoding either the enzyme component (CSTa) or the binding component (CSTb) of C. spiroforme toxin were amplified by PCR using genomic DNA from strain CS246 as a template (Fig. 1a). PCR products were then cloned into the B. megaterium expression vector pHIS1522 to generate C-terminally 6×His-tagged constructs, and plasmids were transformed separately into B. megaterium protoplasts. Tetracycline-resistant clones were grown in liquid LB medium, and protein expression was induced by the addition of xylose. The His-tagged proteins were then purified from crude bacterial lysates by nickel affinity chromatography. The purity of a representative preparation of recombinant C. spiroforme toxin is illustrated in Fig. 1b (CSTa) and Fig. 1c (CSTb, left lane, −trypsin). CSTb was further activated by incubation with trypsin, which is required to achieve full toxicity of CST toxin (Fig. 1c, right lane, +trypsin) (18). Typically, approximately 0.05 mg CSTa and 2 mg CSTb were purified from 1 liter of bacterial culture.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Cloning, recombinant expression, and purification of CSTa and CSTb. (a) The genes encoding CSTa and CSTb were amplified by PCR and by using genomic DNA from C. spiroforme strain CS246 as a template. PCR products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. M, marker. (b and c) Representative SDS-PAGE analysis after Coomassie blue staining of CSTa (arrowhead) (b) and CSTb (before [white arrowhead] and after [black arrowhead] activation with trypsin) after recombinant expression in B. megaterium and nickel affinity purification. The amount of total protein added per lane was 5 μg for panel b and 10 μg for panel c. Protein bands corresponding to CSTa or CSTb were confirmed by MALDI-TOF analysis.

In order to prove that recombinant CSTa and CSTb (trypsin activated) are correctly folded, we added both components in combination or separately (each at 10 nM) to cultured CaCo-2 cells. Only cells that were treated with both components of the recombinant toxin displayed severe morphological alterations (cell rounding) after overnight incubation (Fig. 2a), implying that a binary toxin with full biological activity was formed by both purified CST components. Our next aim was to prove that recombinant toxin-induced cell rounding of CaCo-2 cells is due to the collapse of the actin cytoskeleton. Therefore, we intoxicated CaCo-2 cells for 8 h with recombinant CST (10 nM), fixed the cells, and visualized the actin cytoskeleton by TRITC-phalloidin staining followed by fluorescence microscopy. Depolymerization of actin filaments was obvious only in cells that were treated with toxin (Fig. 2b). Finally, we aimed to substantiate that recombinant CST modifies cellular actin by ADP-ribosylation. This was confirmed by probing the ADP-ribosylation state of actin in lysates of CST-intoxicated cells using an in vitro actin-ADP-ribosylation assay. The amount of actin amenable to in vitro actin-ADP-ribosylation decreased over time only in CaCo-2 cells that were treated with both CST components (each at 10 nM) and not in cells that were treated only with the binding component of CST (Fig. 2c). The ADP-ribosylation state of cellular actin was increased when a higher concentration of recombinant CST (20 nM) was applied to the cells. Collectively, the recombinantly produced components of CST are able to constitute a fully functional binary toxin.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Cytotoxicity analysis of recombinant C. spiroforme toxin. (a) CST-induced cell rounding of CaCo-2 cells. Confluent CaCo-2 cell monolayers were incubated overnight with CSTa and/or CSTb (each at 10 nM) or were left untreated (w/o toxin) prior to microscopic analysis of cell morphology. (b) CST-induced collapse of the actin cytoskeleton. CaCo-2 cells were incubated with CSTa and CSTb (CSTa/b, each at 10 nM) for 8 h or were left untreated (w/o toxin) prior to fixation of cells and staining with TRITC-phalloidin (red, actin) and DAPI (blue, nuclei). Cells were then analyzed by fluorescence microscopy (using the 100× objective). (c) ADP-ribosylation of cellular actin with CST. CaCo-2 cells were treated for the indicated time intervals with CSTa and CSTb (each at 10 or 20 nM) or with CSTb only (20 nM). Subsequently, cells were lysed and cytosolic extracts subjected to in vitro ADP-ribosylation with C2I (modifies actin at the same amino acid residue as CST) and 32P-NAD as a cosubstrate. C2I-modified actin was visualized by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.

LSR is the cellular receptor of C. spiroforme toxin.

Recently, a haploid genetic screen identified LSR as the functional cellular receptor of the CST-related binary toxins C. difficile transferase (CDT) and C. perfringens iota toxin (16). Here, we aimed to clarify whether C. spiroforme toxin also uses LSR for cell entry. We approached this question by the use of H1-HeLa cells, which do not express detectable amounts of LSR protein and are highly resistant to CDT and iota toxin, and FLAG-LSR-transduced H1-HeLa cells (16). Strikingly, after addition of CST to these cells and overnight incubation, clear signs of intoxication, including cell rounding (Fig. 3a) and detachment from culture plates (Fig. 3b), were observed exclusively in FLAG-LSR-transduced H1-HeLa cells [H1-HeLa(+LSR)]. Nontransduced H1-HeLa cells were resistant to toxin addition.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Ectopic expression of LSR increases sensitivity of H1-HeLa cells to CST. (a) Nontransduced (H1-HeLa) and FLAG-LSR-transduced [H1-HeLa(+LSR)] H1-HeLa cells were intoxicated with 10 nM CST (CSTa + CSTb) or with 10 nM CSTb only, and cell morphology was analyzed microscopically after overnight incubation. (b) Intoxication of nontransduced (H1-HeLa) and FLAG-LSR-transduced [H1-HeLa(+LSR)] H1-HeLa cells was performed with increasing concentrations of CST as indicated, and cell detachment was analyzed by crystal violet staining of nondetached cells after 24 h of intoxication. (c) H1-HeLa and H1-HeLa(+LSR) cells were treated for increasing time intervals (as indicated) with 10 nM CST before lysis of cells and in vitro ADP-ribosylation of cytosolic extracts with C2I and 32P-NAD as a cosubstrate. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and C2I-modified actin was visualized by autoradiography. (d) Suspensions of H1-HeLa and H1-HeLa(+LSR) cells were mixed with 10 μg fluorescence-labeled CSTb (CSTbAlexa 488) or without protein (mock) and incubated for 15 min on ice to prevent endocytosis. Cells were then washed twice with PBS and subjected to flow cytometric analysis. Single cell events were plotted against intensity of bound fluorescence (log FL intensity), where gray peaks represent cells without addition of protein (mock) and white peaks cells that were mixed with fluorescence-labeled CSTb (CSTbAlexa 488). (e) Suspensions of H1-HeLa(+LSR) cells were preincubated with either 50 μg activated, unlabeled CSTb (peak with red line) or 50 μg BSA (peak with blue line) or were left without preincubation (peak with black line). Following incubation of the cells for 5 min on ice, fluorescence-labeled CSTb (1 μg) was added. Cells were then washed twice with PBS prior to FACS analysis. The gray peak represents cells that were left without preincubation of unlabeled CSTb and without addition of Alexa-labeled CSTb.

LSR-dependent intoxication was further confirmed by probing the ADP-ribosylation state of actin in lysates of CST-intoxicated H1-HeLa and H1-HeLa(+LSR) cells. The amount of actin in toxin-treated cells that is available for in vitro actin-ADP-ribosylation (carried out with the enzyme component of C. botulinum C2 toxin [C2I]) decreased over time only in FLAG-LSR-transduced H1-HeLa cells and not in nontransduced cells (Fig. 3c).

To further confirm that LSR acts as a cell surface receptor and mediates binding of CST to the cell membrane, Alexa-coupled CSTb was incubated with suspensions of nontransduced and LSR-transduced H1-HeLa cells on ice to prevent endocytosis, and cell surface-bound fluorescence was then detected by FACS analysis. H1-HeLa cells expressing LSR protein showed considerably increased binding of fluorescence-labeled CSTb compared with naïve H1-HeLa cells (Fig. 3d). To substantiate the specificity of CSTb binding to LSR-expressing H1-HeLa cells, we performed a competition assay, where cells were preincubated with a 50-fold excess of activated, unlabeled CSTb or with the same amount of BSA (including trypsin and trypsin inhibitor). Importantly, binding of Alexa-labeled CSTb was specifically reduced on cells that were preincubated with unlabeled CSTb (Fig. 3e).

To validate that LSR binding mediates cell entry of CST, we performed colocalization studies with CaCo-2 cells. For this purpose, Alexa-coupled CSTb was added together with CSTa to CaCo-2 cells that were kept at 4°C to allow binding of the toxin to its receptor at the cell surface. Following an incubation period of 20 min at 37°C to induce endocytic uptake of the receptor/toxin complexes, cells were fixed, permeabilized, and subjected to immunostaining of endogenous LSR. Comparison of fluorescent signals of CST with signals of endogenous, immunolabeled LSR by confocal fluorescence microscopy confirmed colocalization of both proteins in endocytic vesicles (Fig. 4, CST). A similar colocalization pattern was observed when Alexa-labeled CDT was used as a positive control (Fig. 4, CDT). In contrast, endocytic vesicles containing Alexa-labeled C. botulinum C2 toxin, a more distantly CST-related actin-ADP-ribosylating toxin that enters cells via an asparagine-linked complex and hybrid carbohydrate structures (9), did not colocalize with LSR-containing endocytic compartments (Fig. 4, C2). Thus, our collective data demonstrate that CST is an additional member of the iota-like family of binary actin-ADP-ribosylating toxins that targets LSR for host cell entry.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

CST colocalizes with LSR in endocytic vesicles of CaCo-2 cells. CaCo-2 cells were incubated with either CSTa/CSTbAlexa 488 (CST), CDTa/CDTbAlexa 568 (CDT), or C2IAlexa 568/C2II (C2) for 30 min on ice to allow binding of the toxins to the cell surface. Subsequently, cells were shifted to 37°C to induce endocytic uptake of the receptor/toxin complexes. Following an incubation period of 20 min, cells were fixed, permeabilized, and subjected to immunostaining of endogenous LSR. Localization of CST, CDT, or C2 (green signals in merged images, Alexa) and endogenous LSR (red signals in merged images, anti-LSR) was analyzed by confocal fluorescence microscopy (scale bars, 10 μm). Yellow signals in the merged images (merge) indicate colocalization of Alexa signals with immunostained LSR. mag., magnification of boxed area in the merged image.

DISCUSSION

Our study describes the recombinant production of the enzyme component (CSTa) and the binding component (CSTb) of the C. spiroforme toxin in the Bacillus megaterium expression system. The methodology was adapted from protocols that were previously established for the recombinant production of various other clostridial toxins (11, 17, 20, 22). The B. megaterium expression system often offers an advantage over conventional bacterial expression systems (e.g., Escherichia coli) in producing clostridial toxins, obviously due to a similar codon usage of the related genera Bacillus and Clostridium. However, we noticed that the efficiency of producing CSTa in B. megaterium was less than that for CSTb. A significant amount of CSTa protein was found in the insoluble fraction after lysis of bacteria and centrifugation of cell debris. Because we produced both CST components as C-terminally His-tagged proteins, we speculate that the His tag might negatively influence the stability of CSTa, resulting in increased aggregation and partially in the formation of inclusion bodies. As we show that the combined addition of both recombinantly produced CST components to cultured CaCo-2 cells led to the ADP-ribosylation of cellular actin, disruption of the actin cytoskeleton, and changes in cell morphology (cell rounding), our findings indicate that recombinant CST produced in B. megaterium constitutes a fully functional actin-ADP-ribosylating toxin. Since the separate addition of the purified CST components did not lead to intoxication characteristics in CaCo-2 cells, possible toxic contaminants that might be copurified from the expression host can be excluded.

Clostridial actin-ADP-ribosylating toxins are subdivided into two families on the basis of their biological activities and immunological relatedness. One family corresponds to the C2 toxins from C. botulinum (C2 toxin family), and the other family (iota-like toxin family) includes the eponym C. perfringens iota toxin, as well as CST and C. difficile transferase (CDT) (8, 14, 15). Interestingly, binding and enzymatic components are mutually interchangeable among the members of the iota-like toxin family, to form fully active toxins, but not between the C2 toxin and the iota-like toxin group (8, 18). Further interfamily comparisons revealed that C2 toxin recognizes unique cell surface receptors for internalization (9, 10). These findings are in agreement with a recent study from our laboratory that identifies the cellular receptor of CDT and iota toxin, namely, the lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR), which does not mediate cell entry of C2 toxin (16). So far, it has not been investigated whether additional members of the iota toxin family, such as, for example, CST, also use the LSR for entry into host cells. The current study clearly provides evidence that the LSR also represents the target molecule for binding and internalization of CST. Our reasoning was based on H1-HeLa cells that do not produce LSR, thereby exhibiting increased resistance to the CST-related toxins CDT and iota toxin that can be circumvented by ectopic expression of LSR (16). In the current study, intoxication of H1-HeLa cells with CST and binding of the toxin to these cells was strictly dependent on the presence of LSR protein. The role of LSR in the cellular uptake of CST could be substantiated by using an additional cell line (CaCo-2) for colocalization studies, revealing overlapping fluorescence signals of Alexa-labeled toxin and immunolabeled LSR protein in endocytic vesicles.

LSR is a type I single-pass transmembrane protein of the cell surface, featuring an Ig-like V-type domain in the N-terminal, extracellular portion of the protein. The protein is expressed mainly in the liver but also in the intestine and in various other tissues (13, 24). Previous studies suggest that the LSR functions in the cellular uptake of triglyceride-rich, low-density lipoproteins for clearance of chylomicron remnants from blood circulation (4, 23). Recently, an additional role in the organization of tricellular junctions that are involved in epithelial barrier function has been attributed to the LSR protein (12). The finding that disruption of the LSR gene causes lethality in mice also reveals an important role of this protein in early steps during development (13). Our study now highlights that pathogenic clostridia producing iota-like toxins have evolved by hijacking the LSR protein as a membrane target for smuggling their toxins into host cells.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Otilia Wunderlich, Sven Hornei, and Lars Ellenrieder for excellent technical assistance and Michel R. Popoff (Paris, France) for providing genomic DNA from Clostridium spiroforme strain CS246.

This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grants AK6/16-3 and AK6/20-1 (to P.P. and K.A.).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 17 January 2012

REFERENCES

  • 1. Barth H. 2004. Uptake of binary actin ADP-ribosylating toxins. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 152:165–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Barth H, Aktories K, Popoff MR, Stiles BG. 2004. Binary bacterial toxins: biochemistry, biology, and applications of common Clostridium and Bacillus proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68:373–402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Barth H, et al. 2000. Cellular uptake of Clostridium botulinum C2 toxin requires oligomerization and acidification. J. Biol. Chem. 275:18704–18711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bihain BE, Yen FT. 1998. The lipolysis stimulated receptor: a gene at last. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 9:221–224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Blocker D, Behlke J, Aktories K, Barth H. 2001. Cellular uptake of the Clostridium perfringens binary iota-toxin. Infect. Immun. 69:2980–2987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Borriello SP, Carman RJ. 1983. Association of iota-like toxin and Clostridium spiroforme with both spontaneous and antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis in rabbits. J. Clin. Microbiol. 17:414–418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Carman RJ, Borriello SP. 1982. Clostridium spiroforme isolated from rabbits with diarrhoea. Vet. Rec. 111:461–462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Considine RV, Simpson LL. 1991. Cellular and molecular actions of binary toxins possessing ADP-ribosyltransferase activity. Toxicon 29:913–936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Eckhardt M, Barth H, Blocker D, Aktories K. 2000. Binding of Clostridium botulinum C2 toxin to asparagine-linked complex and hybrid carbohydrates. J. Biol. Chem. 275:2328–2334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fritz G, Schroeder P, Aktories K. 1995. Isolation and characterization of a Clostridium botulinum C2 toxin-resistant cell line: evidence for possible involvement of the cellular C2II receptor in growth regulation. Infect. Immun. 63:2334–2340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Guttenberg G, et al. 2011. Inositol hexakisphosphate-dependent processing of Clostridium sordellii lethal toxin and Clostridium novyi alpha-toxin. J. Biol. Chem. 286:14779–14786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Masuda S, et al. 2011. LSR defines cell corners for tricellular tight junction formation in epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 124:548–555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mesli S, et al. 2004. Distribution of the lipolysis stimulated receptor in adult and embryonic murine tissues and lethality of LSR−/− embryos at 12.5 to 14.5 days of gestation. Eur. J. Biochem. 271:3103–3114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ohishi I, Hama Y. 1992. Purification and characterization of heterologous component IIs of botulinum C2 toxin. Microbiol. Immunol. 36:221–229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ohishi I, Okada Y. 1986. Heterogeneities of two components of C2 toxin produced by Clostridium botulinum types C and D. J. Gen. Microbiol. 132:125–131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Papatheodorou P, et al. 2011. Lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR) is the host receptor for the binary toxin Clostridium difficile transferase (CDT). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:16422–16427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Papatheodorou P, Zamboglou C, Genisyuerek S, Guttenberg G, Aktories K. 2010. Clostridial glucosylating toxins enter cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. PLoS One 5:e10673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Popoff MR, Boquet P. 1988. Clostridium spiroforme toxin is a binary toxin which ADP-ribosylates cellular actin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 152:1361–1368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Popoff MR, Milward FW, Bancillon B, Boquet P. 1989. Purification of the Clostridium spiroforme binary toxin and activity of the toxin on HEp-2 cells. Infect. Immun. 57:2462–2469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Schwan C, et al. 2011. Cholesterol- and sphingolipid-rich microdomains are essential for microtubule-based membrane protrusions induced by Clostridium difficile transferase (CDT). J. Biol. Chem. 286:29356–29365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Simpson LL, Stiles BG, Zepeda H, Wilkins TD. 1989. Production by Clostridium spiroforme of an iotalike toxin that possesses mono(ADP-ribosyl)transferase activity: identification of a novel class of ADP-ribosyltransferases. Infect. Immun. 57:255–261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yang G, et al. 2008. Expression of recombinant Clostridium difficile toxin A and B in Bacillus megaterium. BMC Microbiol. 8:192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Yen FT, et al. 1994. Identification of a lipolysis-stimulated receptor that is distinct from the LDL receptor and the LDL receptor-related protein. Biochemistry 33:1172–1180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Yen FT, et al. 1999. Molecular cloning of a lipolysis-stimulated remnant receptor expressed in the liver. J. Biol. Chem. 274:13390–13398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Young JA, Collier RJ. 2007. Anthrax toxin: receptor binding, internalization, pore formation, and translocation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76:243–265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES