Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 6.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2012 Mar 12;14(7):1880–1883. doi: 10.1021/ol300476f

Enantioselective Synthesis of (+)-Crocacin C. An Example of A Highly Challenging Mismatched Double Asymmetric δ-Stannylcrotylboration Reaction

Ming Chen 1, William R Roush 1,*
PMCID: PMC3321065  NIHMSID: NIHMS363526  PMID: 22409510

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms363526u1.jpg

A concise, enantioselective synthesis of (+)-crocacin C is described, featuring a highly diastereoselective mismatched double asymmetric δ-stannylcrotylboration of the stereochemically demanding chiral aldehyde 9 with the bifunctional crotylborane reagent (S)-E-10. The total synthesis of (+)-crocacin C was accomplished in seven steps (longest linear sequence) starting from commercially available precursors.


The crocacins A–D are a family of natural products isolated from Chondromyces crocatus and Chondromyces pediulatus (Figure 1).1 Crocacins A, B, and D are dipeptides of glycine and a 6-aminohexenoic or a 6-aminohexadienoic acid with a polyketide-derived acyl residue connected to the nitrogen atom, while crocacin C is a primary amide of the acyl polyketide fragment. Initial biological studies revealed that the crocacins display antifungal and cytotoxic activities. Compared to crocacins A–C, only crocacin D exhibited potent activity against Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a MIC of 1.4 ng/mL, which indicates that the dipeptide moiety of the crocacins is crucial for their biological properties.1 Recent crystallographic data suggest that the crocacins are a new class of inhibitors of the cytochrome bc1 complex.2

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structures of crocacins A–D.

A characteristic structural feature of crocacin C is the anti,anti-dipropionate stereotriad (highlighted in yellow in Figure 2). It is evident that a mismatched double asymmetric crotylation reaction of an aldehyde substrate, such as 2, with a chiral crotylmetal reagent would be a direct, logical approach to this structural motif.3, 4

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Attempted mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration reactions of aldehyde 2 with reagents 5 and 6 for synthesis of the anti,anti-stereotriad of crocacin C.4f

However, an attempted5f mismatched double asymmetric crotylboration of aldehyde 2 with crotylboronate 5 provided a 1:4 diastereomeric mixture in 60% yield, favoring the undesired 3,4-anti-4,5-syn-stereotriad 4 (Figure 2). Attempted crotylboration of aldehyde 2 using Brown’s crotylborane reagent 6 gave a 1:3 mixture of diastereomers, again favoring the undesired diastereomer 4. Owing to the inability to directly access this requisite anti,anti-stereotriad (e.g., 3), the central theme of multiple approaches developed for the synthesis of crocacin C5, 6 utilize indirect methods7 to prepare the anti,anti-stereotriad with high diastereoselectivity. Strategies involving aldol reactions,5a, 5e–g epoxide ring-opening reactions,5b–d, or the desymmetrization of meso cyclic precursors5i, 6d have been adopted to access the anti,anti-stereotriad units of crocacin C precursors.

We recently described8 highly diastereoselective syntheses of anti,anti-stereotriads using mismatched double asymmetric δ-stannylcrotylboration reactions of chiral aldehydes with crotylborane reagent (S)-E-109 (Figure 3). Because it has been reported that reagents such as 5 and 6 are incapable of overriding the intrinsic diastereofacial preference of aldehyde 2 (Figure 2), we were intrigued whether our new reagent (S)-E-10 could be adopted for synthesis of the anti,anti-stereotriad unit in 7. Furthermore, the vinylstannane unit in 7 can be used in subsequent C–C bond forming reactions, for example, Stille10 coupling with vinyl iodide 8.5a We chose crocacin C as the target molecule for this study because it can be converted into other members of the crocacin family using a Cu-catalyzed coupling reaction as demonstrated by Dias and coworkers.11

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Crocacin C, retrosynthetic analysis.

Starting from acyl oxazolidinone 11, aldehyde 9 was obtained in four steps according to known procedures (Scheme 1).12 Addition of aldehyde 9 to the crotylborane reagent (S)-E-10, generated from the enantioselective and enantioconvergent hydroboration of racemic allenylstannane (±)-1613 with (dIpc)2BH, at −78 °C followed by warming the reaction mixture to ambient temperature for a 24 h reaction period provided the targeted anti,anti-stereotriad 15 in 61% yield and with >15:1 diastereoselectivity.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Total Synthesis of (+)–Crocacin C (1)

Methylation of the secondary alcohol of 15 with Me3O·BF4 and Proton Sponge provided methyl ether 75a in 88% yield. A Pd(0)-catalyzed Stille coupling5a,10 of vinylstannane 7 with vinyl iodide 85a gave (+)-crocacin C (1) in seven steps (longest linear sequence) and in 21% overall yield from 11 without any protecting group manipulations. The spectroscopic data (1H NMR, 13C NMR, [α]D) of synthetic (+)-crocacin C were in excellent agreement with the data previously reported for the natural product.1, 5

The intrinsic diastereofacial preference of aldehyde 9 was assessed by using an anti-crotylboration reaction with the achiral pinacol (E)-crotylboronate 17 (Scheme 2). This reaction provided an 18:1 mixture of 3,4-anti-4,5-syn-stereotriad 18 and anti, anti-stereotriad 19 in 77% yield, with 18 as the major product (as expected3,14). In contrast, the mismatched double asymmetric δ-stannylcrotylboration of aldehyde 9 with (S)-E-10 provided the anti,anti-stereotriad 15 with >15:1 diastereoselectivity. No other crotylation diastereomers were observed in the reaction mixture. Protodestannylation of 15 under acidic conditions (TsOH·H2O) provided alcohol 19 in 87% yield, which matched the minor isomer obtained from crotylboration of 9 with achiral crotylboronate 17.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Crotylboration Studies of Aldehyde 9

The mismatched double asymmetric δ-stannylcrotylboration of 9 with (S)-E-10 thus represents yet another case8 where a significant intrinsic diastereofacial barrier, as presented by chiral aldehyde 9, is overridden by the chiral reagent (S)-E-10. The free energy contribution of reagent (S)-E-10 (i.e., the enantioselectivity of the reagent expressed in energetic terms) necessary to override the 18:1 intrinsic diastereofacial preference of 9 and to generate homoallylic alcohol 15 with >15:1 mismatched diastereoselectivity is ≥3.3 kcal/mol (reaction at 23 °C). The exceptional enantioselectivity of (S)-E-10 defines a new standard of excellence that all future methodological studies on enantioselective crotylboration or crotylmetal-carbonyl addition reactions should be judged against.

In conclusion, the total synthesis of (+)-crocacin C (1) was completed in seven steps (longest linear sequence), which represents the shortest synthesis of 1 reported to date. Most importantly, the mismatched double asymmetric δ-stannylcrotylboration of aldehyde 9, with a signficant 18:1 intrinsic diastereofacial preference, was achieved with exceptional selectivity (>15:1) by using the crotylborane reagent (S)-E-10. The vinylstannane unit in the derived anti, anti-stereotriad 15 facilitates the subsequent Stille reaction that was used to complete this short synthesis of crocacin C. Other applications of reagent (S)-E-10 in the synthesis of biologically active natural products will be reported in due course.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001
2_si_002

Acknowledgments

Financial support provided by the National Institutes of Health (GM038436) and Eli Lilly (for a predoctoral fellowship to M.C.) is gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and spectroscopic data for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.(a) Kunze B, Jansen R, Hofle G, Reichenbach H. J Antibiot. 1994;47:881. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.47.881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Jansen R, Washausen P, Kunze B, Reichenbach H, Hofle G. Eur J Org Chem. 1999:1085. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Crowley PJ, Berry EA, Cromarti T, Daldal F, Godfrey CRA, Lee DW, Phillips JE, Taylor A, Viner R. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008;16:10345. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Reviews of reactions of carbonyl compounds with crotylmetal reagents: Roush WR. In: Comprehensive Organic Synthesis. Trost BM, editor. Vol. 2. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1991. p. 1.Yamamoto Y, Asao N. Chem Rev. 1993;93:2207.Denmark SE, Almstead NG. In: Modern Carbonyl Chemistry. Otera J, editor. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2000. p. 299.Denmark SE, Fu J. Chem Rev. 2003;103:2763. doi: 10.1021/cr020050h.Lachance H, Hall DG. Org React. 2008;73:1.
  • 4.Masamune S, Choy W, Petersen JS, Sita LR. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1985;24:1. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.For total syntheses of crocacin C, see: Feutrill JT, Lilly MJ, Rizzacasa MA. Org Lett. 2000;2:3365. doi: 10.1021/ol0064664.Chakraborty TK, Jayaprakash S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:497.Chakraborty TK, Jayaprakash S, Laxman P. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:9461.Dias LC, de Oliveira LG. Org Lett. 2001;3:3951. doi: 10.1021/ol016845c.Sirasani G, Paul T, Andrade RB. J Org Chem. 2008;73:6386. doi: 10.1021/jo800906p.Sirasani G, Paul T, Andrade RB. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008;18:3648. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.03.003.Gillis EP, Burke MD. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14084. doi: 10.1021/ja8063759.Feutrill JT, Lilly MJ, White JM, Rizzacasa MA. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:4880.Candy M, Audran G, Bienayme H, Bressy C, Pons JM. J Org Chem. 2010;75:1354. doi: 10.1021/jo902582w.
  • 6.For formal syntheses of crocacin C, see: Gurjar MK, Khaladkar TP, Borhade RG, Murugan A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:5183.Raghavan S, Reddy SR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:5593.Besev M, Brehm C, Fürstner A. Collect Czech Chem Commun. 2005;70:1696.Yadav JS, Reddy PV, Chandraiah L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:145.Yadav JS, Reddy MS, Rao PP, Prasad AR. Synlett. 2007:2049.
  • 7.For reviews of methods commonly used to synthesize the anti, anti dipropionate stereotriad: Hoffmann RW. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1987;26:489.Hoffmann RW, Dahmann G, Andersen MW. Synthesis. 1994:629.
  • 8.Chen M, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:3925. doi: 10.1021/ja300472a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen M, Roush WR. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:5744. doi: 10.1021/ja2010187.For synthetic applications of reagent (S)-E-10, see: Sun H, Abbott JR, Roush WR. Org Lett. 2011;13:2734. doi: 10.1021/ol200834p.Yin M, Roush WR. Tetrahedron. 2011;67:10274. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2011.10.029.Chen M, Roush WR. Org Lett. 2012;14:426. doi: 10.1021/ol203161u.
  • 10.Stille JK. Angew Chem, Int Ed Engl. 1986;25:508.Farina V, Krishnamurthy V, Scott WJ. Org React. 1997;50:1.
  • 11.Dias LC, de Oliveira LG, Vilcachagua JD, Nigsch F. J Org Chem. 2005;70:2225. doi: 10.1021/jo047732k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Evans DA, Miller SJ, Ennis MD. J Org Chem. 1993;58:471. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Racemic allenylstannane (±)-16 is prepared in two steps from commercially available (±)-3-butyn-2-ol using the route described for (M)-16 and (P)-16. See: Marshall JA, Lu ZH, Johns BA. J Org Chem. 1998;63:817. doi: 10.1021/jo971900+.Marshall JA, Chobanian H. Org Syn. 2005;82:43.
  • 14.Hoffmann RW, Weidmann U. Chem Ber. 1985;118:3966. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001
2_si_002

RESOURCES