Abstract
The conversion of chemical energy into mechanical force by AAA+ (ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities) ATPases is integral to cellular processes, including DNA replication, protein unfolding, cargo transport, and membrane fusion1. The AAA+ ATPase motor cytoplasmic dynein regulates ciliary trafficking2, mitotic spindle formation3, and organelle transport4, and dissecting its precise functions has been challenging due to its rapid timescale of action and the lack of cell-permeable, chemical modulators. Here we describe the discovery of ciliobrevins, the first specific small-molecule antagonists of cytoplasmic dynein. Ciliobrevins perturb protein trafficking within the primary cilium, leading to their malformation and Hedgehog signaling blockade. Ciliobrevins also prevent spindle pole focusing, kinetochore-microtubule attachment, melanosome aggregation, and peroxisome motility in cultured cells. We further demonstrate the ability of ciliobrevins to block dynein-dependent microtubule gliding and ATPase activity in vitro. Ciliobrevins therefore will be useful reagents for studying cellular processes that require this microtubule motor and may guide the development of additional AAA+ ATPase superfamily inhibitors.
The AAA+ superfamily of enzymes couples ATP hydrolysis with the generation of mechanical force to regulate diverse aspects of prokaryote and eukaryote biology1. ATP-dependent conformational changes can propagate through these molecular machines to complete cellular processes within seconds, and chemical inhibitors that act rapidly and reversibly are much-needed tools for investigating the cellular functions of individual superfamily members. Yet to date only one AAA+ ATPase mechanoenzyme has been selectively targeted by a small molecule5.
We recently conducted a high-throughput screen for inhibitors of the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway (Fig. 1a)6, a key mediator of embryonic development and oncogenesis7. Our study was designed to identify compounds that act downstream of Smoothened (Smo), a transmembrane Hh signaling protein, and one of the small molecules, HPI-4 (Fig. 1b; 1), blocked Hh pathway activation in cells lacking the negative regulator Suppressor of Fused (Sufu)6. Prolonged treatment of cells with this benzoyl dihydroquinazolinone also reduced the number and size of primary cilia, a microtubule-based extension of the plasma membrane that is required for Hh signaling8. Intrigued by these cellular phenotypes, we investigated the biochemical mechanism of HPI-4.
We first synthesized a series of analogs (Fig. 1b; 2-9) and evaluated their effects on Hh signaling and primary cilia formation (Fig. 1, c-d, and Supplementary Figs. 1-3). Chemical derivatives lacking either a 3- or 4-chloro substituent on the benzoyl ring system (2 and 6) or the acyclic ketone (9) were significantly less active in either assay (Fig. 1, b and d). The other small molecules segregated into 2,4-dichlorobenzoyl dihydroquinazolinones that inhibit both Hh signaling and primary cilia formation (1, 3-5), which we henceforth name “ciliobrevins A-D,” and monochlorobenzoyl analogs that can block Hh target gene expression without inducing ciliary defects (7 and 8) (Fig. 1, b and d).
Hh signaling is primarily mediated by the transcription factors Gli2 and Gli3, which exist in a pathway state-dependent balance of N-terminal repressors (Gli2/3R), full-length polypeptides (Gli2/3FL), and transcriptional activators (Gli2/3A) (Fig. 1a)7. Both repressor and activator formation require the primary cilium8, and accordingly ciliobrevins altered the Gli3FL/Gli3R ratio in cells stimulated with the N-terminal domain of Sonic Hedgehog (Shh-N) (Fig. 1e; 30 μM doses of each compound). Shh-N-dependent Gli3FL phosphorylation was also reduced by these compounds, perhaps reflecting loss of Gli3A9. In contrast, none of the other analogs had a significant effect on the Gli3 processing or phosphorylation state (Fig. 1e).
To better understand the basis of these phenotypes, we took advantage of the temporal control afforded by chemical perturbations. While prolonged exposure to these compounds causes defects in axonemal morphology, shorter treatments can divulge ciliobrevin-sensitive processes within structurally intact cilia. Since Hh pathway activation coincides with Gli2 accumulation at the distal ciliary tip10, we examined the effect of ciliobrevins on Gli2 localization (Fig. 1f). We incubated Hh-responsive cells with individual compounds at a 30-μM concentration in the absence or presence of Shh-N-conditioned medium for 4 hours. Gli2 localization was unchanged by derivatives that do not significantly perturb ciliogenesis (2 and 8), whereas ciliobrevins A and D (1 or 5) induced ciliary Gli2 levels comparable to that in Shh-N-stimulated cells.
The ability of ciliobrevins to increase ciliary Gli2 levels suggests that these compounds might target protein trafficking mechanisms within this organelle. Intraflagellar transport (IFT) can be resolved into anterograde trafficking, which requires the plus end-directed motor kinesin-2 and the IFTB multisubunit complex, and retrograde trafficking, which utilizes the minus end-directed motor cytoplasmic dynein 2 and the IFTA complex8. Loss of the primary cilia-specific cytoplasmic dynein 2 heavy chain (Dync2h1) alters cilia morphology11, reduces Hh target gene expression11, and increases ciliary levels of Gli210. Similarities between these genetic phenotypes and the effects of ciliobrevins led us to hypothesize that these small molecules might inhibit cytoplasmic dynein 2. We therefore examined the effect of ciliobrevins on the subcellular localization of IFTB component IFT88, which requires cytoplasmic dynein 2-dependent retrograde transport for its return to the basal body. Treating cells for one hour with ciliobrevin D (5) but not DMSO or an inactive analog (2) significant increased IFT88 levels at the distal tip of primary cilia (Supplementary Fig. 4), providing further evidence that ciliobrevins inhibit cytoplasmic dynein 2 function.
Cytoplasmic dynein complexes have other cellular functions, including the crosslinking and focusing of microtubule minus ends within the mitotic spindle3. These actions create the fusiform shape and localize γ-tubulin-containing complexes to the spindle poles3. Cytoplasmic dynein 1 inhibition by blocking antibodies or dominant-negative constructs perturbs spindle assembly, resulting in disorganized poles and reduced γ-tubulin recruitment3, 12-14. To determine whether ciliobrevins recapitulate these phenotypes, we treated a metaphase-enriched population of NIH-3T3 cells with 50 μM of either ciliobrevin D (5) or an inactive analog (2) for one hour and examined their mitotic structures. Cells treated with ciliobrevin D exhibited abnormal (unfocused, multipolar, or collapsed) spindles with disrupted γ-tubulin localization (Fig. 2, a-b, and Supplementary Fig. 5a), while cells incubated with the non-cilia-disrupting analog or vehicle alone exhibited normal spindle morphologies. Similar ciliobrevin-induced spindle defects were observed in HeLa cells, although to a lesser extent (Fig. 2b). Cytoplasmic dynein 1 is also required for establishing stable kinetochore-microtubule interactions15, and ciliobrevin D treatment disrupted the formation of cold-stable microtubules that mediate proper spindle-chromosome attachments (Fig. 2c).
To investigate if these spindle-disruptive effects were associated with altered dynein localization, we examined binding partners that recruit or co-localize with this motor. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed that p150-Glued, a dynactin component proposed to recruit dynein to kinetochores and spindle poles during mitosis16, was localized to the disorganized spindle poles of ciliobrevin D-treated cells (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 5b). Kinetochore targeting of p150-Glued was also unaffected by ciliobrevin D, as assessed in nocodazole-treated cells to obviate effects due to microtubule-attachment status (Supplementary Fig. 6). We similarly observed that Zeste white 10 (Zw10), a component of the Rod/Zw10/Zwilch complex that recruits cytoplasmic dynein 1 to kinetochores17, and the kinetochore-associated protein Centromere protein E (CENP-E)18 correctly localized to kinetochores under these conditions (Supplementary Fig. 6), indicating that their recruitment and kinetochore structure itself are not disrupted by ciliobrevins. Thus, ciliobrevin-induced spindle phenotypes likely result from dynein inhibition rather than mislocalization.
To further characterize the mitotic defects associated with ciliobrevin treatment, we conducted real-time confocal microscopy of GFP-tubulin-expressing NIH-3T3 cells (Supplementary Fig. 7, a-d). Within minutes of ciliobrevin D treatment, spindles collapsed, bipolarity was lost, and spindle poles appeared disorganized. Upon compound washout, bipolar spindles quickly re-emerged and chromosomes segregated at anaphase without any pronounced defects. Ciliobrevin D addition also reversibly disrupted the pre-formed spindles of metaphase-arrested cells (Supplementary Fig. 8, a-c) and reduced overall microtubule levels (Supplementary Fig. 8d). These latter effects are mitosis-specific, as microtubule levels in non-dividing cells were unaffected by inhibitor treatment (Supplementary Fig. 7, e-f). Taken together, these results reveal that cytoplasmic dynein is not only required for spindle pole assembly but also actively participates in its maintenance.
Cytoplasmic dynein 1 also regulates organelle trafficking, such as the melatonin-induced aggregation of melanosomes in Xenopus melanophores19. To determine if melanosome trafficking is sensitive to ciliobrevins, we cultured Xenopus melanophores with melanocyte-stimulating hormone to disperse these pigment granules and then treated the cells with melatonin and various concentrations of ciliobrevin D (5) or an inactive analog (2). Ciliobrevin D reversibly inhibited melanosome aggregation, but the non-cilia-disrupting derivative had no discernible effect at comparable doses (Fig. 3, a-b, and Supplementary Movies 1-3). Ciliobrevin D similarly abrogated the movement of peroxisomes in Drosophila S2 cells (Fig. 3, c-d, and Supplementary Movies 4-5), consistent with the role of cytoplasmic dynein in their bidirectional motility20.
Collectively, these results indicate that ciliobrevins are specific, reversible inhibitors of disparate cytoplasmic dynein-dependent processes. Ciliobrevins do not perturb cellular mechanisms that are independent of dynein function, including actin cytoskeleton dynamics (Supplementary Fig. 9) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphoinositol-3-kinase signaling pathways6. To more directly examine whether cytoplasmic dynein is the direct target of ciliobrevins, we evaluated their effects on dynein-dependent microtubule gliding in vitro. Ciliobrevins A and D (1 and 5) retarded the ATP-dependent movement of fluorescently labeled microtubules on bovine cytoplasmic dynein-coated glass slides in a reversible and dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4, a-c, Supplementary Fig. 10, and Supplementary Movies 6-8); analogs that did not perturb cytoplasmic dynein-dependent processes in our cell-based assays (2 and 8) had minimal effects (Fig. 4, a-b, and Supplementary Movie 9). The conserved structure-activity-relationships of dihydroquinazolinones in the microtubule gliding and cell-based assays confirm cytoplasmic dynein as the ciliobrevin target, and neither ciliobrevin A nor D significantly affected K560/kinesin-1-dependent microtubule gliding in vitro at 100 μM concentrations (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Movies 10-12). The compounds do not broadly target members of the AAA+ ATPase family either, as they have no effect on p97-dependent degradation of endoplasmic reticulum-associated proteins (Supplementary Fig. 11) or Mcm2-7-mediated DNA unwinding (Supplementary Fig. 12).
We next investigated how ciliobrevins abrogate cytoplasmic dynein function. Neither ciliobrevin A nor D was able to disrupt the association between ADP-bound dynein and microtubules, as determined in a co-sedimentation assay (Supplementary Fig. 13). Both small molecules, however, were able to inhibit the ATPase activity of bovine brain cytoplasmic dynein in a concentration-dependent manner, while their inactive analog (2) could not (Supplementary Fig. 14). The compounds had analogous effects on the ATPase activity of recombinant rat dynein motor domain, but none significantly inhibited the ATPase activities of recombinant motor domains derived from human kinesin-1 or kinesin-5 (Fig. 4e). Ciliobrevin efficacies at various ATP concentrations suggest that these small molecules act in a nucleotide-competitive manner (Fig. 4f). Consistent with this mechanism, ciliobrevin A also inhibited ultraviolet light-induced cleavage of the cytoplasmic dynein motor domain in the presence of sodium vanadate and ATP (Supplementary Fig. 15).
Our studies establish ciliobrevins as the first small molecules known to specifically inhibit cytoplasmic dynein in vitro and in live cells. Although the ATP analog erythro-9-[3-(2-hydroxynonyl)]adenine21 and the antioxidant nordihydroguaiaretic acid22 have been previously reported to abrogate dynein function, these compounds are promiscuous enzyme antagonists23,24. The natural product purealin can partially inhibit dynein ATPase activity in vitro25, but its ability to block cytoplasmic dynein-dependent cellular processes has not been demonstrated. Our studies indicate that ciliobrevins can inhibit both cytoplasmic dynein 1 and 2, and accordingly, the compounds will be broadly applicable probes of dynein-dependent processes. Further development of ciliobrevin-like molecules could lead to isoform-selective inhibitors of this minus-end directed microtubule motor and perhaps specific antagonists of other AAA+ ATPase superfamily members.
Methods Summary
Hh signaling assays
Hh signaling and Gli3 processing assays were performed as described6,9.
Cell imaging
Cilia were immunostained with anti-Arl13b antibody (T. Caspary), and cilia size was determined by dividing the number of Arl13b-positive pixels by the number of nuclei per image. Ciliary levels of Gli2 and IFT88 were determined by immunostaining cells with anti-Gli2 (R&D Systems) or anti-IFT88 (ProteinTech Group) antibodies. Analyses of mitotic spindles and kinetochore-microtubule attachments in fixed cells were performed as described26, and real-time confocal microscopy was conducted with NIH-3T3 cells stably expressing GFP-tubulin. Melanosome and peroxisome motility studies were conducted as reported19,20.
Dynein activity assays
Bovine brain dynein was purified as described27, and its microtubule gliding activity was assayed as reported28 with modifications. Recombinant rat cytoplasmic dynein motor domain was heterologously expressed and purified as described29. ATPase activities were determined using a Malachite Green assay (Novus Biologicals).
Full Methods
Full Methods and any associated references are available in Supplementary Information.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank T. Caspary for anti-Arl13b antibodies, W. Brinkley for human CREST anti-serum, T. Yen for anti-CENP-E antibodies, U. Peters for purified bovine dynein, S. Wacker for human kinesin-5 motor domain, R. Vallee for a pVL1393 baculovirus expression vector containing the rat dynein motor domain, and K. Bersuker and R. Kopito for TCRα-GFP-expressing cells. This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA136574 to J.K.C.; R01 GM65933 to T.M.K; R01 GM71772 to T.M.K. and V.I.G.; R01 GM52111 to V.I.G.)
Footnotes
Author Contributions: J.K.C. and T.M.K. conceived and directed the study. A.J.F. performed chemical syntheses and assays of Hedgehog signaling, primary cilia formation and function, ATPase activity, vanadate-dependent dynein photocleavage, and p97-dependent protein degradation. A.J.F. and M.M. performed mitotic spindle analyses. K.B. and V.I.G. designed and interpreted the melanophore and peroxisome trafficking assays. J.S.W. performed microtubule gliding and dynein/microtubule binding assays. L.D.L. and M.O. designed and interpreted the Mcm2-7 helicase assays. A.J.F. and J.K.C. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all other authors.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary Information is available online.
Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of this article at www.nature.com/nature.
References
- 1.White SR, Lauring B. AAA+ ATPases: achieving diversity of function with conserved machinery. Traffic. 2007;8:1657–1667. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00642.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Scholey JM. Intraflagellar transport. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003;19:423–443. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111401.091318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Merdes A, Ramyar K, Vechio JD, Cleveland DW. A complex of NuMA and cytoplasmic dynein is essential for mitotic spindle assembly. Cell. 1996;87:447–458. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81365-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Akhmanova A, Hammer JA., 3rd Linking molecular motors to membrane cargo. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22:479–487. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chou TF, et al. Reversible inhibitor of p97, DBeQ, impairs both ubiquitin-dependent and autophagic protein clearance pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:4834–4839. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015312108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hyman JM, et al. Small-molecule inhibitors reveal multiple strategies for Hedgehog pathway blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:14132–14137. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907134106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jiang J, Hui CC. Hedgehog signaling in development and cancer. Dev Cell. 2008;15:801–812. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goetz SC, Anderson KV. The primary cilium: a signalling centre during vertebrate development. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:331–344. doi: 10.1038/nrg2774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Humke EW, Dorn KV, Milenkovic L, Scott MP, Rohatgi R. The output of Hedgehog signaling is controlled by the dynamic association between Suppressor of Fused and the Gli proteins. Genes Dev. 2010;24:670–682. doi: 10.1101/gad.1902910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kim J, Kato M, Beachy PA. Gli2 trafficking links Hedgehog-dependent activation of Smoothened in the primary cilium to transcriptional activation in the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:21666–21671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912180106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huangfu D, Anderson KV. Cilia and Hedgehog responsiveness in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:11325–11330. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505328102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Heald R, et al. Self-organization of microtubules into bipolar spindles around artificial chromosomes in Xenopus egg extracts. Nature. 1996;382:420–425. doi: 10.1038/382420a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gaglio T, Dionne MA, Compton DA. Mitotic spindle poles are organized by structural and motor proteins in addition to centrosomes. J Cell Biol. 1997;138:1055–1066. doi: 10.1083/jcb.138.5.1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Young A, Dictenberg JB, Purohit A, Tuft R, Doxsey SJ. Cytoplasmic dynein-mediated assembly of pericentrin and gamma tubulin onto centrosomes. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:2047–2056. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.6.2047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Varma D, Monzo P, Stehman SA, Vallee RB. Direct role of dynein motor in stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment, orientation, and alignment. J Cell Biol. 2008;182:1045–1054. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200710106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.King SJ, Brown CL, Maier KC, Quintyne NJ, Schroer TA. Analysis of the dynein-dynactin interaction in vitro and in vivo. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:5089–5097. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-01-0025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Starr DA, Williams BC, Hays TS, Goldberg ML. ZW10 helps recruit dynactin and dynein to the kinetochore. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:763–774. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.3.763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yen TJ, Li G, Schaar BT, Szilak I, Cleveland DW. CENP-E is a putative kinetochore motor that accumulates just before mitosis. Nature. 1992;359:536–539. doi: 10.1038/359536a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gross SP, et al. Interactions and regulation of molecular motors in Xenopus melanophores. J Cell Biol. 2002;156:855–865. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200105055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim H, et al. Microtubule binding by dynactin is required for microtubule organization but not cargo transport. J Cell Biol. 2007;176:641–651. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200608128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bouchard P, Penningroth SM, Cheung A, Gagnon C, Bardin CW. erythro-9-[3-(2-Hydroxynonyl)]adenine is an inhibitor of sperm motility that blocks dynein ATPase and protein carboxylmethylase activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:1033–1036. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Arasaki K, Tani K, Yoshimori T, Stephens DJ, Tagaya M. Nordihydroguaiaretic acid affects multiple dynein-dynactin functions in interphase and mitotic cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2007;71:454–460. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.029611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schliwa M, Ezzell RM, Euteneuer U. erythro-9-[3-(2-Hydroxynonyl)]adenine is an effective inhibitor of cell motility and actin assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:6044–6048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.19.6044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Park S, Lee DK, Yang CH. Inhibition of fos-jun-DNA complex formation by dihydroguaiaretic acid and in vitro cytotoxic effects on cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 1998;127:23–28. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(97)00543-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhu G, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of purealin and analogues as cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2006;49:2063–2076. doi: 10.1021/jm051030l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maldonado M, Kapoor TM. Constitutive Mad1 targeting to kinetochores uncouples checkpoint signalling from chromosome biorientation. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:475–482. doi: 10.1038/ncb2223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Woehlke G, et al. Microtubule interaction site of the kinesin motor. Cell. 1997;90:207–216. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80329-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kapoor TM, Mitchison TJ. Allele-specific activators and inhibitors for kinesin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:9106–9111. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hook P, et al. Long range allosteric control of cytoplasmic dynein ATPase activity by the stalk and C-terminal domains. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:33045–33054. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504693200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Taipale J, et al. Effects of oncogenic mutations in Smoothened and Patched can be reversed by cyclopamine. Nature. 2000;406:1005–1009. doi: 10.1038/35023008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.