Background: Matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP7) processes mouse pro-α-defensins to bactericidal forms in Paneth cells, and MMP7(−/−) mice are considered to be α-defensin-null.
Results: Activated α-defensins occur in the colonic lumen of MMP7(−/−) mice.
Conclusion: α-Defensins are activated in MMP7(−/−) large bowel lumen by alternative proteolytic conversion mechanisms.
Significance: MMP7(−/−) mice are unsuitable for studying α-defensin deficiency in large intestine.
Keywords: Antimicrobial Peptides, Defensins, Innate Immunity, Intestinal Epithelium, Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP), Intestinal Microbiota, Intestinal Mucosa
Abstract
Paneth cell α-defensins mediate host defense and homeostasis at the intestinal mucosal surface. In mice, matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP7) converts inactive pro-α-defensins (proCrps) to bactericidal forms by proteolysis at specific proregion cleavage sites. MMP7(−/−) mice lack mature α-defensins in Paneth cells, accumulating unprocessed precursors for secretion. To test for activation of secreted pro-α-defensins by host and microbial proteinases in the absence of MMP7, we characterized colonic luminal α-defensins. Protein extracts of complete (organ plus luminal contents) ileum, cecum, and colon of MMP7-null and wild-type mice were analyzed by sequential gel permeation chromatography/acid-urea polyacrylamide gel analyses. Mature α-defensins were identified by N-terminal sequencing and mass spectrometry and characterized in bactericidal assays. Abundance of specific bacterial groups was measured by qPCR using group specific 16 S rDNA primers. Intact, native α-defensins, N-terminally truncated α-defensins, and α-defensin variants with novel N termini due to alternative processing were identified in MMP7(−/−) cecum and colon, and proteinases of host and microbial origin catalyzed proCrp4 activation in vitro. Although Paneth cell α-defensin deficiency is associated with ileal microbiota alterations, the cecal and colonic microbiota of MMP7(−/−) and wild-type mice were not significantly different. Thus, despite the absence of MMP7, mature α-defensins are abundant in MMP7(−/−) cecum and colon due to luminal proteolytic activation by alternative host and microbial proteinases. MMP7(−/−) mice only lack processed α-defensins in the small intestine, and the model is not appropriate for studying effects of α-defensin deficiency in cecal or colonic infection or disease.
Introduction
Paneth cells, located at the base of small intestinal crypts of Lieberkühn, provide survival signals for Lgr5+ crypt stem cells (1) and secrete α-defensins and additional host defense proteins in response to cholinergic and microbial stimuli (2–6). Paneth cell α-defensins elicit direct antimicrobial effects by peptide-induced membrane disruption (7–11). Defensins confer resistance to oral infection and modulate the composition of the resident small intestinal microbiota (12, 13). Colonocytes do not synthesize α-defensins (14–16), but recovery of Paneth cell α-defensins from mouse colonic lumen has shown that they persist in vivo and may influence innate immunity in the large bowel (17).
Inactive ∼8.4 kDa α-defensin precursors are converted to bactericidal peptides by proteolytic separation of inhibitory acidic amino acid proregion residues (18–20). In mouse Paneth cells, pro-α-defensins (proCrps) are processed intracellularly by matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP7)2 to produce mature ∼4.5 kDa α-defensins (termed Crps in mice) (20, 21). MMP7(−/−) mouse small intestinal tissue lacks mature α-defensin peptides and secretes inactive pro-α-defensins, identifying MMP7 as the mouse Paneth cell pro-α-defensin activating convertase (20). Partial removal or mutagenesis of the proregion is sufficient to generate antimicrobial function. Consequently, the three mouse proCrp4 MMP7 processing intermediates are as bactericidal as mature Crp4 (22, 23). In contrast, human Paneth cells lack MMP7 and accumulate pro-α-defensins, e.g. human prodefensin 5 (proHD5), which is processed by trypsin after secretion (19). The proregions of α-defensin precursors are sensitive to proteolysis, but mature α-defensins resist degradation in vitro by MMP7, trypsin, or neutrophil serine proteases (18, 19, 24).
Because mature α-defensins persist in wild type mouse colonic lumen (17) and pro-α-defensin proregions are susceptible to proteolytic degradation (25), we tested whether proteases of host or microbial origin could activate pro-α-defensins luminally after secretion by MMP7(−/−) Paneth cells. Results show that MMP7(−/−) mouse colonic lumen contains active, mature α-defensins, indicating that luminal proteinases convert inactive precursors to bactericidal forms in the absence of the native convertase.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Preparation of Recombinant Peptides
Peptides were prepared by recombinant methods and purified to homogeneity as described (9, 26). Briefly, peptides were expressed in Escherichia coli as N-terminal His6-tagged fusion proteins using the pET-28a expression vector (Novagen Inc., Madison, WI) and affinity purified (25–27). Peptide homogeneity was assessed by analytical RP-HPLC, AU-PAGE (28), and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry using a Microflex LRF mass spectroscope (Bruker Daltonics, Maynard, MA) (22).
Animals
Procedures on mice were performed with approval and in compliance with the policies of the animal care and use committees at the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), University of California, Irvine, and University of Southern California. Animals from MCW were housed under SPF conditions in the MCW Biomedical Resource Center vivarium. C57BL/6 breeding pairs were obtained from Taconic Laboratories, and MMP7(−/−) breeding pairs originally were provided by Dr. Carole Wilson. HD5 (DEFA5(+/+)) transgenic mice on a C57BL6 background (29) were intercrossed with MMP7(−/−) mice on a C57BL6 background to generate DEFA5(+/−)MMP7(−/−) mice. Experimental mice were obtained from in-house breeding colonies at MCW. Experiments at UC Irvine and the University of Southern California were performed on MMP7(−/−) and C57BL/6 mice ordered from The Jackson Laboratory. Animals were housed under 12 h cycles of light and dark and had free access to standard mouse chow and water.
Purification of Enteric α-Defensins
Peptides were isolated using a modified procedure described previously (16). Segments of ileum, cecum, and distal large bowel were excised from mice immediately after euthanasia, placed on dry ice, and subjected to immediate protein extraction or stored at −80 °C until processed. Protein extracts were prepared from “complete” organ, consisting of tissues plus luminal contents, except for the HD5(+/−)MMP7(−/−) mouse distal small intestine and corresponding MMP7(−/−) controls. For these samples, the luminal contents were flushed from the organ with phosphate-buffered saline. Samples were homogenized in 100 ml of ice-cold 60% acetonitrile plus 1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), incubated at 4 °C overnight, clarified by centrifugation, and lyophilized. Freeze-dried samples were suspended in 5 ml 5% acetic acid and chromatographed on 10 × 120 cm Bio-Gel P-60 columns (Bio-Rad) (17). α-Defensins were identified in AU-PAGE gels stained with Coomassie-brilliant blue as rapidly migrating peptides in late-eluting P-60 fractions (16, 28). Samples of combined α-defensins were purified further by cation exchange chromatography and quantified by Bradford assay (Pierce Protein Assay) before use in bactericidal peptide assays (17).
Peptide Analysis by Mass Spectrometry
Samples were separated by C18 RP-HPLC that was developed with an aqueous 10–45% linear gradient of acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA (30) delivered in 90 min at 1 ml/min. Samples of HPLC fractions were mixed with an equal volume of 10 mg/ml α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 60% acetonitrile, 0.1% TFA, dried, and analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS.
Peptide Transfer and N-terminal Sequencing
α-Defensin preparations from wild type and knock-out mouse samples were run in AU-PAGE and electroblotted to 0.1 μm PVDF membrane (Millipore Immobilon PSQ) using 5% acetic acid as the transfer buffer. Individual peptide bands were excised from Coomassie-stained membranes were subjected to nine rounds of Edman reactions on an ABI 494-HT Procise Edman Sequencer by the Molecular Structure Facility at the University of California, Davis.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Tissue samples from distal small intestine, cecum, and large intestine from MMP7(−/−) mice were preserved in RNAlater. RNA was isolated using RNeasy minikit (Qiagen), according to kit directions. cDNA was generated for each sample using iScript (Bio-Rad). Real-time PCR was performed for mouse α-defensins and GAPDH. Isolated total RNA was quantified by ultraviolet absorbance at 260 nm using a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer, and reverse transcribed with reverse transcriptase according to the supplier's protocol (iScript, Bio-Rad). Real-time PCR was performed using the tissue-specific cDNA as a template with specific oligonucleotide primer pairs for Crp1, Crp21, and GAPDH as previously described (13). Each 82.5 μl of PCR reaction contained each oligonucleotide primer at the final concentration of 0.42 μm 1× SYBR Green Mix (Bio-Rad) and 50–100 ng of template DNA. The qRT-PCR was performed using the MyiQ Single-Color Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). A no- template reaction was included as a negative control for each qRT-PCR experiment, and for absolute quantification gene-specific plasmid standards were included within every set of reactions. The real time PCR program started with an initial step at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C and 45 s at 60 °C. Data were acquired in the final step at 60 °C.
Bactericidal Assays
The bactericidal activities of α-defensin preparations were tested against E. coli ML35, Listeria monocytogenes 10403S, and Citrobacter rodentium DBS100 (31) as described (21, 25). Citrobacter rodentium DBS100 was provided by the late Dr. David B. Schauer (Division of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and is available as ATCC 51459. Exponentially growing bacteria (5 × 106/ml) were exposed to peptides for 1 h at 37 °C in 50 μl of PIPES-TSB, diluted and plated. Surviving bacteria were quantified as colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml) after overnight growth. Data were from three independent experiments and expressed as the mean ± standard deviations.
Anti-HD5 Western Blot
Ten percent of protein extracted from DEFA5(+/−)MMP7(−/−) and MMP7(−/−) intestinal samples were resolved by AU-PAGE, transferred to a 0.2 μm nitrocellulose membrane, blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h at ambient temperature, and incubated with agitation at room temperature overnight with rabbit anti-HD5 immune serum (32) diluted 1:2000 in Tris-buffered saline/Tween (250 mm Tris, 1.37 m NaCl, 26.8 mm KCl, 1% Tween, pH 7.4) containing 5% skim milk. Washed blots were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Pierce) diluted 1:20,000 in Tris-buffered saline/Tween for 1 h, washed, and developed using SuperSignal pico chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce).
Pro-α-Defensin Sensitivity to Trypsin, Chymotrypsin, and Neutrophil Elastase Proteolysis
Recombinant α-defensins were digested with trypsin (Sigma, T-8253), α-chymotrypsin (Sigma, C-9135), or neutrophil elastase (Elastin Products Company, Inc.) and analyzed for susceptibility to proteolysis by AU-PAGE and MALDI-TOF MS. Samples (10 μg of proCrp4 or 5 μg Crp4 or (6C/A)-Crp4) were incubated with each proteinase overnight at 37 °C at a substrate to enzyme molar ratio of 50:1 in 50 mm ammonium bicarbonate (pH 8.0). Samples consisting of 85% of each digest were analyzed by AU-PAGE, and the remainder of each digest was subjected to MALDI-TOF MS.
Pro-α-Defensin Sensitivity to E. faecalis Culture Supernatants
10 μg of proCrp4 or an equivalent volume of the 0.01% acetic acid storage buffer was mixed with 100 μl of E. faecalis OG1RF or JRC105 (33) supernatants, PBS buffer, or TSB. Reactions were diluted to 1 ml in PBS buffer and incubated 3 h at 37 °C. The reactions then were diluted to a final concentration of 5% acetic acid for α-defensin purification using C18 SepPak cartridges (Waters, Milford, MA) following manufacturer's instructions with pro-α-defensin and α-defensin elution occurring at 40% acetonitrile, 1% TFA. Purified samples were lyophilized, and 88% of each digest was analyzed by AU-PAGE, and the remainder was analyzed using MALDI-TOF MS.
Quantitative Real-time PCR Amplification of 16 S rRNA Gene Sequences
The cecum and large intestine isolated from the experimental animals were weighed and homogenized before bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using the Qiagen Stool Kit (Qiagen) following previously published procedures (34, 35). The abundance of specific intestinal bacterial groups was measured by qPCR using the MyiQ Single-Color Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) using group specific 16S rDNA primers (Operon Technologies Huntsville, AL) as previously described (34). Group specific primers were used to detect the following major groups: Eubacterium rectale/Clostridium coccoides (Erec), Lactobacillus sp. (Lact), Bacteroides sp. (Bac), Mouse Intestinal Bacteroides (MIB), Segmented Filamentous Bacteria (SFB), and total bacteria (Eubacteria) (34).
RESULTS
Mature α-Defensins in Cecal and Colonic Lumen of MMP7(−/−) Mice
α-Defensins were apparent in protein extracts from complete (whole organ plus luminal contents) cecum and colon of MMP7-null mice (Fig. 1E and F). Acid-urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (AU-PAGE) analyses of proteins separated by gel permeation chromatography showed that small, cationic peptides characteristic of mouse α-defensins (16, 28) were abundant in complete wild-type C57BL/6 mouse small intestine (Fig. 1A). In contrast, similar MMP7(−/−) mouse protein extracts had markedly lower α-defensin levels as found previously (20) (Fig. 1D). The low but detectable α-defensin levels in MMP7(−/−) complete ileum may have resulted from luminal activation of pro-α-defensins that had been secreted by Paneth cells in duodenum and jejunum. α-Defensins were evident in wild type C57BL/6 complete cecum and colon (Fig. 1, B and C), and protein extracts from complete MMP7(−/−) cecum and colon contained processed α-defensins, unexpectedly at wild type levels (Fig. 1, E and F). It should be noted that Paneth cell α-defensins in wild type mouse large intestine derive from luminal contents, not from tissue of the large bowel (14, 17). qRT-PCR measurements showed that Crp mRNA levels in cecum and colon are 1000-fold lower than in ileum of MMP7(−/−) mice, excluding aberrant α-defensin gene expression in colonocytes or appearance of ectopic Paneth cells induced by the MMP7-null condition as a source of the peptides (supplemental Fig. S1). Because MMP7-null Paneth cells secrete inactive α-defensin precursors (21), the released pro-α-defensins must have become activated after secretion into the lumen.
FIGURE 1.
Putative α-defensins in MMP7(−/−) cecum and colon. Proteins were extracted from complete organs and separated by P-60 gel permeation chromatography. Sample aliquots of every third fraction were analyzed by AU-PAGE and proteins were visualized with Coomassie Blue stain (“Experimental Procedures”). Separations are shown here as follows: (A) C57BL/6 wild type ileum, (B) wild type cecum, (C) wild type colon, (D) MMP7(−/−) ileum, (E) MMP7(−/−), and (F) MMP7(−/−) colon. The boxed region denotes either α-defensins (A–C, E, and F) or α-defensin predicted position (D) based on the P-60 elution volume and migration in AU-PAGE (17). Negligible levels of mature α-defensins were detected in the MMP7(−/−) ileum compared with C57BL/6 mice (A, D), but α-defensin levels in cecum (B, E) and colon (C, F) were similar for both groups.
Alternative Processing of Pro-α-defensins in the MMP7(−/−) Intestinal Lumen
α-Defensins from the MMP7(−/−) colonic lumen included native and N-terminally truncated α-defensins as well as a novel variant that is inferred to be a product of alternative luminal processing. The novel N terminus of sequence one was ESLRDLV_Y with a mass consistent with the retention of two Glu-Ser residues from the proregion C terminus (Fig. 2A). This unique α-defensin sequence represents a processed variant not identified previously with MMP7-mediated activation (21, 22, 25). In the past, native and N-terminally truncated α-defensins also were identified in Outbred Swiss distal large intestine (17). Luminal MMP7(−/−) colonic α-defensins in a single P-60 fraction (Fig. 1F) were characterized further by C18 RP-HPLC and MALDI-TOF MS, which identified experimental masses corresponding to Crps 3, 20, 21, 24, and 27 (Fig. 2B), and Edman sequencing detected the N-terminal sequence DLV_Y_RAR, corresponding to Crp24 or Crp27 (Fig. 2A). N-terminal sequence three, DLV_Y_LI, did not match any known C57BL/6 Paneth cell α-defensin. Perhaps the peptide is coded by a novel gene in one of the unannotated gaps in the current assemblies (36, 37). Nevertheless, fully processed α-defensins were found to be abundant in the lumen of the cecum and colon of MMP7 knockouts, evidence that secreted pro-α-defensins had been activated luminally in the absence of the natural convertase.
FIGURE 2.
Primary structures of MMP7(−/−) colonic α-defensins. A, primary structure of proCrp24 is depicted with the mature α-defensin peptide denoted as italicized text and MMP7 cleavage sites indicated by arrows. α-Defensins from MMP7(−/−) complete colon were separated by AU-PAGE, electroblotted, and selected peptide bands were subjected to Edman sequencing (“Experimental Procedures.”). N-terminal sequences identified from MMP7(−/−) colon are shown underneath the reference proCrp24. N-terminal sequence 1 retained two proregion residues, shown double underlined. B, MALDI-TOF MS analyses of peptides purified from a single P-60 column fraction by RP-HPLC identified both native and truncated C57BL/6 Paneth cell α-defensins as shown. The canonical disulfide array is depicted above the Crp3 sequence, and dash characters were introduced to maintain the conserved cysteine spacing. The removal of one or two N-terminal amino acids from the mature α-defensin peptide is indicated in the peptide name by the prefix des plus the single letter amino acid abbreviation for the removed residues.
MMP7-null colonic α-defensins had in vitro bactericidal peptide activities equivalent to those of wild type C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 3, A--C) even though MMP7(−/−) and C57BL/6 luminal α-defensins had minor qualitative differences (Fig. 2). As seen previously (17), combined native α-defensin preparations contained small peptide fragments from non-defensin proteins that reduced bactericidal peptide activity relative to the homogeneous control peptide, Crp4. These in vitro findings showed that α-defensins in the MMP7-null colonic lumen have the potential to contribute to innate immunity.
FIGURE 3.
Bactericidal activity of α-defensins from MMP7(−/−) colonic lumen. A, L. monocytogenes, B, C. rodentium, and C, E. coli ML35 were incubated with α-defensin mixtures from C57BL/6 and MMP7(−/−) mice, and bacterial cell survival was measured. Data from three independent experiments are expressed as the mean ± S.D. Bactericidal peptide activities of α-defensin preparations from MMP7(−/−)] colon (□), C57BL/6 colon (■), C57BL/6 ileum (●), and recombinant Crp4 (♦) were compared. At the highest peptide concentration tested, 10 μg/ml, all colonic α-defensin preparations reduced bacterial cell survival equivalently.
Processing of Human Paneth Cell ProHD5 Is Independent of MMP7 in Mice
Processing of human HD5 differs from mechanisms of mouse enteric α-defensin activation. Intact proHD5 is the predominant molecular form of HD5 in human Paneth cells with only low levels of detectable mature HD5, and only processed HD5 is detected in the intestinal lumen (12). Also, HD5 transgenic (DEFA5(+/+)) mice express HD5 only in Paneth cells of the small intestine and not in the colon (12). Because human Paneth cells lack MMP7 and trypsin is the HD5 activating convertase, we examined the possibility of a role for MMP7 in HD5 processing in the context of DEFA5(+/+) transgenic mouse Paneth cells.
To test whether MMP7 is required to process HD5 in DEFA5(+/+) mouse Paneth cells, we crossed DEFA5(+/+) mice with MMP7(−/−) mice to obtain DEFA5(+/−) MMP7(−/−) mice, and proHD5 processing still was found to occur in the MMP7-deficient state (Fig. 4). Protein extracts of DEFA5(+/−) MMP7(−/−) flushed ileum contained unprocessed proHD5 as the major form, although a low level of mature HD5 was detected in ileal tissue (Fig. 4). HD5, but not proHD5, was detected in cecum and colon, showing that secreted proHD5 was activated luminally. Also, protein extracts from DEFA5(+/+) mouse complete cecum and colon contained immunoreactive HD5 (not shown). Thus, HD5 did not require MMP7 for processing in DEFA5(+/+) mouse Paneth cells, and the peptide persisted in the distal bowel.
FIGURE 4.
Processed human α-defensin HD5 in DEFA5(+/−) MMP7(−/−) mice. Samples of defensins extracted from HD5(+/−)MMP7(−/−) ileum (lane 1), cecum (lane 2), and colon (lane 3) and MMP7(−/−) ileum (lane 5), cecum (lane 6), and colon (lane 7) were run in AU-PAGE alongside recombinant HD5 control (lane 4) and analyzed by Western blots. Anti-HD5 antibody reacted with a peptide from HD5(+/−)MMP7(−/−) ileum, cecum, and colon that co-migrated with the mature HD5 as well as apparent proHD5 and processing intermediates from the ileum.
Alternative in Vitro Mouse Pro-α-defensin Processing by Host Proteases
The presence of activated Paneth cell α-defensins in MMP7(−/−) colonic lumen suggested that host proteases could activate pro-α-defensins by an alternative mechanism. To test this hypothesis, proCrp4 was exposed in vitro to proteinases, and digests were analyzed by AU-PAGE and MALDI-TOF MS to assess proteolysis. Trypsin, chymotrypsin, and neutrophil elastase degraded the proCrp4 proregion extensively, producing native Crp4 and additional peptides as major digestion products (Fig. 5, A and C). Trypsin and chymotrypsin digests contained variants with additional C-terminal proregion residues at the Crp4 N terminus (Fig. 5C), and neutrophil elastase produced (LR)-Crp4 and (R)-Crp4 peptide variants (Fig. 5, A and C), variants of Crp4 with one or two additional amino acids retained at the N terminus. Native Crp4 was resistant to all enzymes, but disulfide-null (6C/A)-Crp4 was degraded extensively by all proteinases (Fig. 5, A and C), consistent with earlier findings (26). Although levels of trypsin, chymotrypsin, and neutrophil elastase in the intestinal lumen are unknown, their in vitro proCrp4 activation showed that host enzymes are capable of mediating luminal processing when the cellular convertase is absent.
FIGURE 5.
Mouse pro-α-defensin processing by proteinases of host and bacterial origin. A, 10 μg of proCrp4, 5 μg Crp4, and 5 μg (6C/A)-Crp4 (26) were incubated overnight with or without (−) trypsin (T), chymotrypsin (C), or neutrophil elastase (E). Digests were analyzed by AU-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue. B, PBS buffer alone (1), TSB media alone (2), WT E. faecalis OG1RF culture supernatant (3), and mutant E. faecalis JRC105 culture supernatant lacking GelE and SprE (4) were incubated for 3 h with (+) or without (−) the addition of 10 μg of recombinant proCrp4, and digests were analyzed by Coomassie-stained AU-PAGE. C, arrows above the proCrp4 primary structure indicate cleavage sites by trypsin (T), chymotrypsin (C), neutrophil elastase (E), and E. faecalis culture supernatant (E.f.) in vitro as deduced from MALDI-TOF MS analyses of the proCrp4 digests. Previously characterized MMP7-mediated (M) cleavage sites are shown for comparison.
Mouse Pro-α-defensin Processing by Bacterial Proteinases
Because pro-α-defensins interact with the microbiota once secreted, we tested whether bacterial proteases can activate proCrp4 in vitro. Enterococcus faecalis, an intestinal commensal and opportunistic pathogen (38, 39), secretes both gelatinase (GelE) and serine protease E (SprE) (40). GelE degrades many substrates including the human cathelicidin, LL-37 (41). Exposure of proCrp4 to culture supernatants of wild-type E. faecalis OG1RF resulted in complete precursor conversion to (LR)-Crp4 (Fig. 5), but supernatant from E. faecalis JRC105, a mutant strain lacking GelE and SprE (33), did not process proCrp4 to forms recognizable by AU-PAGE or MS analysis (Fig. 5B). Thus, GelE and/or SprE secreted by E. faecalis mediated in vitro proCrp4 processing (Fig. 5, B and C), and no proteolysis occurred within the mature Crp4 polypeptide backbone, regardless of protease exposure (Fig. 5). Therefore, luminal proteinases of microbial origin may process pro-α-defensins alternatively, including specific proteases secreted by species of the commensal microbiota.
Cecal and Colonic Microbiota Are Not Significantly Affected by MMP7 Deficiency
In MMP7(−/−) mice, defective intracellular Paneth cell pro-α-defensin processing is associated with changes in the ileal microbiota, shifting the relative abundance of Bacteroides species (Bact) and Mouse Intestinal Bacteroides (MIB) significantly (13). In contrast to that outcome, the relative abundance of bacterial groups analyzed did not differ significantly in cecum (Fig. 6A) or colon (Fig. 6B) of MMP7(−/−) and C57BL/6 mice. Although additional factors may shape the composition of the large intestinal microbiota, the respective similarities of MMP7(−/−) and C57BL/6 cecal and colonic microbiota are consistent with alternative luminal pro-α-defensin processing to normal α-defensin levels in the distal intestinal lumen under MMP7-null conditions.
FIGURE 6.
Quantitative cecum and colon bacterial composition of MMP7(−/−), MMP7(+/−), and MMP7(+/+) littermates. MMP7(+/−) breeding pairs were used to generate successive litters of MMP7(+/+) (●, n = 10), MMP7(+/−) (♢, n = 24), and MMP7(−/−) (□, n = 9) mice. Genomic DNA was isolated from the ceca and large intestines of successive litters of mice. The bacterial composition of the intestines was determined by qPCR. Log number of total copies of specific bacterial 16 S rDNA in the (A) cecum, and (B) large intestine of each mouse was measured by qPCR to determine the abundance of total bacteria and the following major groups: Eubacterium rectal-Clostridium coccoides (Erec), Lactobacillus sp. (Lact), Bacteroides sp. (Bact), Mouse Intestinal Bacteroides (MIB), and Segmented Filamentous Bacteria (SFB).
DISCUSSION
In MMP7(−/−) mice, secreted pro-α-defensins are activated luminally by one or more alternative mechanisms. Enteric α-defensins are made and secreted almost exclusively by small intestinal Paneth cells, and the mature peptides resist proteolysis of the polypeptide backbone, accumulate in the colonic lumen regardless of MMP7(−/−) status (Figs. 1 and 2), and retain bactericidal peptide activity comparable to α-defensins from wild-type mouse colonic lumen (Fig. 3). α-Defensin-associated differences in the ileal microbiota of C57BL/6 and MMP7(−/−) mice did not occur in cecum or colon, consistent with the similar abundance of luminal α-defensin peptides in the mice (Figs. 1 and 6). Representative host proteases and culture supernatants of E. faecalis converted proCrp4 to active forms in vitro (Fig. 5), and we propose that host or microbial proteinases may activate secreted pro-α-defensins in the lumen, if the natural intracellular convertase is absent.
α-Defensin deficiency in MMP7(−/−) mice is restricted to the small bowel. The MMP7(−/−) and C57BL/6 colonic lumen have similar α-defensin peptide levels (Figs. 1 and 2). Studies of MMP7(−/−) mouse susceptibility to oral infection have focused on E. coli and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium infections of the small intestine and cecum and detected reduced bacterial clearance from distal small intestine (20). In MMP7(−/−) mice infected with Shigella flexneri, increased numbers of S. flexneri were detected in colons of newborn MMP7(−/−) mice, but factors other than MMP7 deficiency or low α-defensin levels also may contribute to Shigella survival when Paneth cell numbers are low as they are in newborn mice (42). Because the colonic microbial burden is several orders of magnitude greater than that of the small bowel and wild type and MMP7(−/−) colonic α-defensins are less abundant than in wild type small intestine, α-defensins may affect the colonic microbiota by means other than direct peptide-mediated cell killing. For example, low peptide concentrations of certain defensins inhibit bacterial peptidoglycan synthesis by lipid II binding (10, 43), and α-defensins may use a lipid II binding mechanism to exert selective antimicrobial effects on the local microbiota in the distal bowel. In view of these considerations, studies of enteric α-defensin deficiency in MMP7(−/−) mice are best limited to the small intestine.
Recovery of α-defensins with heterogeneous N termini from MMP7(−/−) colonic lumen shows that luminal proteinases activate extracellular pro-α-defensins in the lumen. In humans, Paneth cell α-defensins are processed extracellularly by trypsin during or after secretion (19), and transgenic HD5 persists in the mouse colonic lumen and perhaps in human colon as well (Fig. 4). Possibly, a number of proHD5 molecules escape trypsin activation and may be activated by luminal host or bacterial proteinases. Transgenic HD5 activation was independent of MMP7 in the DEFA5(+/−)MMP7(−/−) mice, even though pro-α-defensin processing in mouse Paneth cells requires MMP7. The detection of native Crp3 and Crp27 in MMP7(−/−) colonic lumen shows that one or more luminal proteases can cleave pro-α-defensins at the final MMP7 cleavage site, generating Crps as fully processed as those converted by MMP7 within Paneth cells (Fig. 2). Isolation of luminal (des-Leu-Arg)-Crp and (des-Leu)-Crp variants from MMP7(−/−) mice further suggests involvement of an aminopeptidase to generate these products after pro-α-defensin secretion into the lumen (Fig. 2), consistent with previous findings (17). Finally, one abundant α-defensin processing variant from MMP7(−/−) colonic lumen retained two residues from the proregion C terminus due to alternative processing. α-Defensins that retain proregion residues have not been detected previously in wild-type mice (Fig. 2). Thus, luminal proteases cleave the proregion to produce activated, bactericidal α-defensins in vivo, and luminal host or microbial proteinases could provide alternative activating enzymes in the absence of MMP7, the natural convertase. Because all proCrp4 processing intermediates and full-length proCrp4 molecules with mutations at inhibitory acidic amino acid residue positions have the same bactericidal peptide activity as fully processed Crp4 (22, 23), we speculate that any enzymes that cleave the proregion to remove inhibitory acidic amino acids will yield a bactericidal peptide (23).
Diverse host or microbial proteases in the intestinal lumen may provide alternative pro-α-defensin convertase activity in the extracellular environment. Trypsin, chymotrypsin, and neutrophil elastase all remove the proCrp4 proregion in vitro (Fig. 5), and secreted gelatinase or serine protease from E. faecalis cultures process proCrp4 without degrading the α-defensin moiety (Fig. 5). Because the large bowel hosts an estimated 1014 commensal bacteria and is chronically exposed to ingested microbes, including many protease-producers (44), secreted bacterial proteases may be an abundant source of luminal pro-α-defensin activating enzymes. Host proteases are robust pro-α-defensin activators in vitro, so it seems unlikely that bacterial enzymes are essential activators of luminal pro-α-defensins in MMP7(−/−) large intestine. Analyses of luminal α-defensins in germ-free MMP7(−/−) mice could provide estimates of the contribution of enteric bacteria to precursor activation. Because α-defensins shape the composition of the resident ileal microbiota, such alternative convertase activities, exemplified by host enzymes and E. faecalis GelE and SprE, would ensure the luminal presence of α-defensins, their selective effects on the microbiota, and the maintenance of innate immunity of the enteric environment.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Tokiyoshi Ayabe, Department of Cell Biological Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan for the gift of anti-HD5. E. faecalis culture supernatants were generously provided by Dr. Christopher Kristich at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics. Also, we thank Amy Pollard at the Medical College of Wisconsin for technical assistance and Dr. Jack Presley at the University of California, Davis Molecular Structure Facility for assistance with Edman sequence analysis.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants DK044632, AI059346 (to A. J. O.), AI022931, AI058129 (to M. E. S.), and AI057757 (to N. H. S.) and by the USC Norris Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA014089.

This article contains supplemental Fig. S1.
- MMP
- matrix metalloproteinase
- Crp
- cryptdin
- AU-PAGE
- acid-urea PAGE
- Bact
- Bacteroides spp.
- CFU
- colony-forming unit
- Erec
- Eubacterium rectal-Clostridium coccoides
- HD5
- human Paneth cell α-defensin-5
- Lact
- Lactobacillus spp.
- MIB
- mouse intestinal Bacteroides
- qRT-PCR
- quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
- RP-HPLC
- reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography
- SFB
- segmented filamentous bacteria.
REFERENCES
- 1. Sato T., van Es J. H., Snippert H. J., Stange D. E., Vries R. G., van den Born M., Barker N., Shroyer N. F., van de Wetering M., Clevers H. (2011) Paneth cells constitute the niche for Lgr5 stem cells in intestinal crypts. Nature 469, 415–418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Porter E. M., Bevins C. L., Ghosh D., Ganz T. (2002) The multifaceted Paneth cell. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 59, 156–170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Harwig S. S., Eisenhauer P. B., Chen N. P., Lehrer R. I. (1995) Cryptdins: endogenous antibiotic peptides of small intestinal Paneth cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 371A, 251–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Qu X. D., Lloyd K. C., Walsh J. H., Lehrer R. I. (1996) Secretion of type II phospholipase A2 and cryptdin by rat small intestinal Paneth cells. Infect Immun. 64, 5161–5165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cash H. L., Whitham C. V., Behrendt C. L., Hooper L. V. (2006) Symbiotic bacteria direct expression of an intestinal bactericidal lectin. Science 313, 1126–1130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ayabe T., Satchell D. P., Wilson C. L., Parks W. C., Selsted M. E., Ouellette A. J. (2000) Secretion of microbicidal α-defensins by intestinal Paneth cells in response to bacteria. Nat. Immunol. 1, 113–118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hadjicharalambous C., Sheynis T., Jelinek R., Shanahan M. T., Ouellette A. J., Gizeli E. (2008) Mechanisms of α-defensin bactericidal action: comparative membrane disruption by cryptdin-4 and its disulfide-null analogue. Biochemistry 47, 12626–12634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kagan B. L., Selsted M. E., Ganz T., Lehrer R. I. (1990) Antimicrobial defensin peptides form voltage-dependent ion-permeable channels in planar lipid bilayer membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 210–214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Satchell D. P., Sheynis T., Kolusheva S., Cummings J., Vanderlick T. K., Jelinek R., Selsted M. E., Ouellette A. J. (2003) Quantitative interactions between cryptdin-4 amino terminal variants and membranes. Peptides 24, 1795–1805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. de Leeuw E., Li C., Zeng P., Diepeveen-de Buin M., Lu W. Y., Breukink E., Lu W. (2010) Functional interaction of human neutrophil peptide-1 with the cell wall precursor lipid II. FEBS Lett. 584, 1543–1548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hristova K., Selsted M. E., White S. H. (1996) Interactions of monomeric rabbit neutrophil defensins with bilayers: comparison with dimeric human defensin HNP-2. Biochemistry 35, 11888–11894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Salzman N. H., Ghosh D., Huttner K. M., Paterson Y., Bevins C. L. (2003) Protection against enteric salmonellosis in transgenic mice expressing a human intestinal defensin. Nature 422, 522–526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Salzman N. H., Hung K., Haribhai D., Chu H., Karlsson-Sjöberg J., Amir E., Teggatz P., Barman M., Hayward M., Eastwood D., Stoel M., Zhou Y., Sodergren E., Weinstock G. M., Bevins C. L., Williams C. B., Bos N. A. (2010) Enteric defensins are essential regulators of intestinal microbial ecology. Nat. Immunol. 11, 76–83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ouellette A. J., Cordell B. (1988) Accumulation of abundant messenger ribonucleic acids during postnatal development of mouse small intestine. Gastroenterology 94, 114–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Patil A., Hughes A. L., Zhang G. (2004) Rapid evolution and diversification of mammalian α-defensins as revealed by comparative analysis of rodent and primate genes. Physiol. Genomics 20, 1–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Selsted M. E., Miller S. I., Henschen A. H., Ouellette A. J. (1992) Enteric defensins: antibiotic peptide components of intestinal host defense. J. Cell Biol. 118, 929–936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Mastroianni J. R., Ouellette A. J. (2009) α-Defensins in enteric innate immunity: functional Paneth cell α-defensins in mouse colonic lumen. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 27848–27856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kamdar K., Maemoto A., Qu X., Young S. K., Ouellette A. J. (2008) In vitro activation of the rhesus macaque myeloid α-defensin precursor proRMAD-4 by neutrophil serine proteinases. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 32361–32368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ghosh D., Porter E., Shen B., Lee S. K., Wilk D., Drazba J., Yadav S. P., Crabb J. W., Ganz T., Bevins C. L. (2002) Paneth cell trypsin is the processing enzyme for human defensin-5. Nat. Immunol. 3, 583–590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wilson C. L., Ouellette A. J., Satchell D. P., Ayabe T., López-Boado Y. S., Stratman J. L., Hultgren S. J., Matrisian L. M., Parks W. C. (1999) Regulation of intestinal α-defensin activation by the metalloproteinase matrilysin in innate host defense. Science 286, 113–117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ayabe T., Satchell D. P., Pesendorfer P., Tanabe H., Wilson C. L., Hagen S. J., Ouellette A. J. (2002) Activation of Paneth cell α-defensins in mouse small intestine. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 5219–5228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Weeks C. S., Tanabe H., Cummings J. E., Crampton S. P., Sheynis T., Jelinek R., Vanderlick T. K., Cocco M. J., Ouellette A. J. (2006) Matrix metalloproteinase-7 activation of mouse Paneth cell pro-α-defensins: SER43↓ILE44 proteolysis enables membrane-disruptive activity. J. Biol. Chem., 281, 28932–28942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Figueredo S. M., Weeks C. S., Young S. K., Ouellette A. J. (2009) Anionic amino acids near the pro-α-defensin N terminus mediate inhibition of bactericidal activity in mouse pro-cryptdin-4. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 6826–6831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wilson C. L., Schmidt A. P., Pirilä E., Valore E. V., Ferri N., Sorsa T., Ganz T., Parks W. C. (2009) Differential processing of α- and β-defensin precursors by matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP7). J. Biol. Chem. 284, 8301–8311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Shirafuji Y., Tanabe H., Satchell D. P., Henschen-Edman A., Wilson C. L., Ouellette A. J. (2003) Structural determinants of procryptdin recognition and cleavage by matrix metalloproteinase-7. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 7910–7919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Maemoto A., Qu X., Rosengren K. J., Tanabe H., Henschen-Edman A., Craik D. J., Ouellette A. J. (2004) Functional analysis of the α-defensin disulfide array in mouse cryptdin-4. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 44188–44196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Tanabe H., Qu X., Weeks C. S., Cummings J. E., Kolusheva S., Walsh K. B., Jelinek R., Vanderlick T. K., Selsted M. E., Ouellette A. J. (2004) Structure-activity determinants in Paneth cell α-defensins: loss-of-function in mouse cryptdin-4 by charge-reversal at arginine residue positions. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 11976–11983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Selsted M. E. (1993) Investigational approaches for studying the structures and biological functions of myeloid antimicrobial peptides. Genetic Engineering 15, 131–147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Biswas A., Liu Y. J., Hao L., Mizoguchi A., Salzman N. H., Bevins C. L., Kobayashi K. S. (2010) Induction and rescue of Nod2-dependent Th1-driven granulomatous inflammation of the ileum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 14739–14744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ouellette A. J., Satchell D. P., Hsieh M. M., Hagen S. J., Selsted M. E. (2000) Characterization of luminal Paneth cell α-defensins in mouse small intestine. Attenuated antimicrobial activities of peptides with truncated amino termini. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 33969–33973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Schauer D. B., Zabel B. A., Pedraza I. F., O'Hara C. M., Steigerwalt A. G., Brenner D. J. (1995) Genetic and biochemical characterization of Citrobacter rodentium sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 2064–2068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Tanabe H., Ayabe T., Maemoto A., Ishikawa C., Inaba Y., Sato R., Moriichi K., Okamoto K., Watari J., Kono T., Ashida T., Kohgo Y. (2007) Denatured human α-defensin attenuates the bactericidal activity and the stability against enzymatic digestion. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 358, 349–355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kristich C. J., Chandler J. R., Dunny G. M. (2007) Development of a host-genotype-independent counterselectable marker and a high-frequency conjugative delivery system and their use in genetic analysis of Enterococcus faecalis. Plasmid 57, 131–144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Barman M., Unold D., Shifley K., Amir E., Hung K., Bos N., Salzman N. (2008) Enteric salmonellosis disrupts the microbial ecology of the murine gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun. 76, 907–915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Croswell A., Amir E., Teggatz P., Barman M., Salzman N. H. (2009) Prolonged impact of antibiotics on intestinal microbial ecology and susceptibility to enteric Salmonella infection. Infect Immun. 77, 2741–2753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Amid C., Rehaume L. M., Brown K. L., Gilbert J. G., Dougan G., Hancock R. E., Harrow J. L. (2009) Manual annotation and analysis of the defensin gene cluster in the C57BL/6J mouse reference genome. BMC Genomics 10, 606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Shanahan M. T., Tanabe H., Ouellette A. J. (2011) Strain-specific polymorphisms in Paneth cell α-defensins of C57BL/6 mice and evidence of vestigial myeloid α-defensin pseudogenes. Infect Immun. 79, 459–473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Richards M. J., Edwards J. R., Culver D. H., Gaynes R. P. (2000) Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States. Infect Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 21, 510–515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Fisher K., Phillips C. (2009) The ecology, epidemiology, and virulence of Enterococcus. Microbiology 155, 1749–1757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Qin X., Singh K. V., Weinstock G. M., Murray B. E. (2001) Characterization of fsr, a regulator controlling expression of gelatinase and serine protease in Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. J. Bacteriol. 183, 3372–3382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Schmidtchen A., Frick I. M., Andersson E., Tapper H., Björck L. (2002) Proteinases of common pathogenic bacteria degrade and inactivate the antibacterial peptide LL-37. Mol. Microbiol. 46, 157–168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Shim D. H., Ryu S., Kweon M. N. (2010) Defensins play a crucial role in protecting mice against oral Shigella flexneri infection. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 401, 554–560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Schneider T., Kruse T., Wimmer R., Wiedemann I., Sass V., Pag U., Jansen A., Nielsen A. K., Mygind P. H., Raventós D. S., Neve S., Ravn B., Bonvin A. M., De Maria L., Andersen A. S., Gammelgaard L. K., Sahl H. G., Kristensen H. H. (2010) Plectasin, a fungal defensin, targets the bacterial cell wall precursor Lipid II. Science 328, 1168–1172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Salzman N. H., Underwood M. A., Bevins C. L. (2007) Paneth cells, defensins, and the commensal microbiota: a hypothesis on intimate interplay at the intestinal mucosa. Semin. Immunol. 19, 70–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]