Skip to main content
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B logoLink to Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
. 2012 Apr;13(4):244–247. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1100180

Improvement of PCR reaction conditions for site-directed mutagenesis of big plasmids

Bogdan Munteanu 1, Mario Braun 1, Kajohn Boonrod 1,†,
PMCID: PMC3323938  PMID: 22467364

Abstract

QuickChange mutagenesis is the method of choice for site-directed mutagenesis (SDM) of target sequences in a plasmid. It can be applied successfully to small plasmids (up to 10 kb). However, this method cannot efficiently mutate bigger plasmids. Using KOD Hot Start polymerase in combination with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) purified primers, we were able to achieve SDM in big plasmids (up to 16 kb) involving not only a single base change but also multiple base changes. Moreover, only six polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycles and 0.5 µl of polymerase (instead of 18 PCR cycles and 1.0 µl of enzyme in the standard protocol) were sufficient for the reaction.

Keywords: Site-directed mutagenesis (SDM), Mutant, Plasmid


QuickChange mutagenesis is a method for achieving site-directed mutagenesis (SDM) in a plasmid, by substitution, deletion, or insertion of nucleotides in the target plasmid. The method is fast, straightforward, and essential in functional studies, genetic engineering, and biochemistry. QuickChange mutagenesis employs polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using oligonucleotide primer pairs that carry the desired mutation, deletion, or insertion. There are many approaches for mutagenesis using PCR (Kunkel, 1985; Cormack, 1994; Ishii et al., 1998; Chapnik et al., 2008; Kumar and Rajagopal, 2008; Li et al., 2008; Liu and Naismith, 2008; Tseng et al., 2008; Edelheit et al., 2009; Fushan and Drayna, 2009). QuickChange is widely used for SDM of a plasmid which uses complementary primer pairs in the same PCR reaction. The parental methylated DNA can be eliminated from the newly synthesized unmethylated mutant DNA by digesting with DpnI restriction enzyme. The mutant DNA product has a strand break (nick) which can be ligated by host repair enzymes. Although this method is simple, it has some limitations (Zheng et al., 2004). One limitation is the size of the target plasmid. Although there are some commercial kits for mutating big plasmids, they are costly. Home-made SDM (Laible and Boonrod, 2009) offers a low cost alternative. This method is, however, efficient only for plasmids smaller than 10 kb. The factors which may affect the efficiency of the method may be the quality and efficacy of the polymerases and primers used. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of two polymerases in combination with two different purified primers and also identified the most efficient polymerase and the purity of primers for achieving SDM in a big plasmid using the QuickChange method. Moreover, we also investigated the minimal requirement of PCR cycles and the amount of enzyme used for the mutagenesis reaction.

The high-fidelity Pfu DNA polymerase commonly used in SDM can amplify a DNA template up to 20 kb (recommended by Fermentas, Germany). Indeed, using Pfu DNA polymerase for SDM of a plasmid less than 10 kb can be very efficient (Laible and Boonrod, 2009). However, our attempts to achieve SDM in a plasmid bigger than 10 kb were unfortunately not successful. This prompted us to investigate alternative polymerases and conditions for use in SDM of a big plasmid. KOD Hot Start DNA polymerase is a premixed complex of high-fidelity KOD DNA polymerase and two monoclonal antibodies that inhibit the DNA polymerase and 3′-5′ exonuclease activities at ambient temperature (Mizuguchi et al., 1999). The enzyme can amplify plasmids up to 21 kb and it exhibits a higher fidelity than PfuTurbo (Fujii et al., 1999; Kitabayashi et al., 2002). To validate the efficacies of the two polymerases for SDM of a big plasmid, an NcoI restriction site was deleted from the target sequence of binary vectors (pKB-DRD1-GFP-DRM-Red, 16 kb) kindly provided by Dr. Michael WASSENEGGER using the QuickChange method and was used as a marker for analyzing the successful mutation. The two complementary primers (forward pKB-DR-NcoI-delete, 5′-CACCATTTACGAACGATACCTACGGTTTTGTTTACATTG-3′ and reverse pKB-DR-NcoI-delete, 5′-CAATGTAAACAAAACCGTAGGTATCGTTCGTAAATGGTG-3′, where italic and underlined alphabets indicate the mutated bases) were designed as described by Laible and Boonrod (2009) and purified by either desalting or high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The reaction was performed and the mixtures were incubated in a thermocycler according to the conditions shown in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1.

PCR reaction components

Polymerase Template plasmid DNA (ng) Volume (µl)
Forward primer 10 pmol Reverse primer 10 pmol Buffer MgCl2 50 mmol/L dNTPs 10 mmol/L DNA polymerase Final volume by adding H2O
Pfu 70 1 1 5 0 1 1 50
KOD Hot Start 70 1 1 5 3 1 1/0.5 50

Pfu polymerase (2.5 U/µl) purchased from Fermentas, Germany; KOD Hot Start polymerase (1.0 U/µl) purchased from Novagen, Germany

Table 2.

PCR reaction conditions

Polymerase Denaturated temperature/time
Annealing temperature/time Extension temperature/time Holding temperature (°C)
Template Activated enzyme
Pfu 95 °C/1 min 95 °C/30 s 55 °C/1 min 72 °C/12 min 4
KOD Hot Start 94 °C/2 min 98 °C/10 s 57 °C/30 s 68 °C/6 min 4

The PCR products were electrophoresed in a 1% Tris-acetate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (TAE) gel and visualized under ultraviolet (UV) light. In addition, the PCR products were digested with DpnI restriction enzyme and then were transformed into Escherichia coli competent cells. The results revealed that the reaction using desalted primers in combination with either Pfu or KOD Hot Start polymerase did not yield any PCR products (Fig. 1). PCR products and transformants were obtained only when using HPLC-purified primers and KOD Hot Start polymerase (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Gel electrophoresis of PCR products

(a) Comparison of the efficiencies of two DNA polymerases using desalted and HPLC-purified primers. The plasmid pKB-DRD1-GFP-DRM-Red (16 kb) was mutated using 1 µl of either Pfu or KOD Hot Start DNA polymerase in combination with either desalted or HPLC-purified primers. The reactions were performed as described in Tables 1 and 2 using 18 cycles. (b) Comparison of the different PCR cycles required for the mutagenesis reaction. KOD Hot Start DNA polymerase (0.5 µl) and HPLC-purified primers were used for SDM of the pKB-DRD1-GFP-DRM-Red (16 kb) plasmid in varying PCR cycles (from 18 to 6). The PCR reactions were performed as described in Tables 1 and 2. After PCR, 5 µl of each reaction was electrophoresed in 1% TAE agarose gel

To confirm that the plasmids were mutated, plasmids were prepared from 10 different colonies and analyzed by NcoI restriction digestion as described by Zhang et al. (2009). The results showed that all tested plasmids were mutated. In addition, the mutants were confirmed by sequence analysis. The sequence analysis of the whole insert gene from three different positive clones revealed that no additional mutants were found (data not shown). However, we could not exclude additional mutants among the mutated clones.

We conclude that KOD Hot Start DNA polymerase in combination with HPLC-purified primers is the key factor for achieving SDM in a big plasmid. To confirm that this combination can be applied to SDM with more than single base changes, we performed other sets of mutagenesis trials in which 5 or 8 bases were substituted. The results revealed that all mutants were successful and 99% of the tested transformants were correctly mutated (data not shown).

To reduce time and costs of the reaction, we investigated the reaction conditions by reducing the number of cycles and the amount of the polymerase.

The pKB-DRD1-GFP-DRM-Red plasmid was used as a template and the reactions were performed as described in Tables 1 and 2, except that the PCR reactions were performed by varying the number of PCR cycles (from 18 to 6) and only 0.5 µl of the KOD Hot Start DNA polymerase was used. The result (Fig. 1) showed that the plasmid was amplified and transformants were obtained under all conditions tested. The restriction digestion and sequence analysis indicated that the plasmids obtained from all reactions were 100% mutated (data not shown). These results indicated that only six reaction cycles and 0.5 µl of polymerase were sufficient to generate a mutant.

In conclusion, KOD-polymerase in combination with HPLC-purified primers is efficient for achieving SDM in big plasmids (up to 16 kb). Only 0.5 µl of the enzyme and six cycles of reaction are sufficient for the PCR reaction.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Guenther BUCHHOLZ (RLP AgroScience GmbH, AlPlanta-Institute for Plant Research, Germany) for valuable suggestions and Dr. Michael WASSENEGGER (RLP AgroScience GmbH, AlPlanta-Institute for Plant Research, Germany) for providing the plasmid.

References

  • 1.Chapnik N, Sherman H, Froy O. A one-tube site-directed mutagenesis method using PCR and primer extension. Anal Biochem. 2008;372(2):255–257. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cormack B. Introduction of a point mutation by sequential PCR steps. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 1994;2:8.5.7–8.5.9. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Edelheit O, Hanukoglu A, Hanukoglu I. Simple and efficient site-directed mutagenesis using two single-primer reactions in parallel to generate mutants for protein structure-function studies. BMC Biotechnol. 2009;9(1):61. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-9-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fujii S, Akiyama M, Aoki K, Sugaya Y, Higuchi K, Hiraoka M, Miki Y, Saitoh N, Yoshiyama K, Ihara K, et al. DNA replication errors produced by the replicative apparatus of Escherichia coli . J Mol Biol. 1999;289(4):835–850. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fushan AA, Drayna DT. MALS: an efficient strategy for multiple site-directed mutagenesis employing a combination of DNA amplification, ligation and suppression PCR. BMC Biotechnol. 2009;9(1):83. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-9-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ishii TM, Zerr P, Xia XM, Bond CT, Maylie J, Adelman JP. Site-directed mutagenesis. Methods Enzymol. 1998;293:53–71. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(98)93007-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kitabayashi M, Nishiya Y, Esaka M, Itakura M, Imanaka T. Gene cloning and polymerase chain reaction with proliferating cell nuclear antigen from Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2002;66(10):2194–2200. doi: 10.1271/bbb.66.2194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kumar R, Rajagopal K. Single-step overlap-primer-walk polymerase chain reaction for multiple mutagenesis without overlap extension. Anal Biochem. 2008;377(1):105–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kunkel TA. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. PNAS. 1985;82(2):488–492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Laible M, Boonrod K. Homemade site directed mutagenesis of whole plasmids. J Vis Exp. 2009;(27):pii:1135. doi: 10.3791/1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li J, Li C, Xiao W, Yuan D, Wan G, Ma L. Site-directed mutagenesis by combination of homologous recombination and DpnI digestion of the plasmid template in Escherichia coli . Anal Biochem. 2008;373(2):389–391. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.10.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu H, Naismith JH. An efficient one-step site-directed deletion, insertion, single and multiple-site plasmid mutagenesis protocol. BMC Biotechnol. 2008;8(1):91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-8-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mizuguchi H, Nakatsuji M, Fujiwara S, Takagi M, Imanaka T. Characterization and application to Hot Start PCR of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against KOD DNA polymerase. J Biochem. 1999;126(4):762–768. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tseng WC, Lin JW, Wei TY, Fang TY. A novel megaprimed and ligase-free, PCR-based, site-directed mutagenesis method. Anal Biochem. 2008;375(2):376–378. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang BZ, Zhang X, An XP, Ran DL, Zhou YS, Lu J, Tong YG. An easy-to-use site-directed mutagenesis method with a designed restriction site for convenient and reliable mutant screeing. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B. 2009;10(6):479–482. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zheng L, Baumann U, Reymond JL. An efficient one-step site-directed and site-saturation mutagenesis protocol. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(14):e115. doi: 10.1093/nar/gnh110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B are provided here courtesy of Zhejiang University Press

RESOURCES