Abstract
Xenorhabdus bacterium has been used as a biological control agent against Luciaphorus sp., a mushroom mite endemic in Thailand. To develop an effective formulation of Xenorhabdus stokiae, treatments using different parts of X. stokiae isolate PB09 culture, including whole cell suspension, cell-free supernatant, and crude cell extract, were performed. The results show that different parts of X. stokiae isolate PB09 culture could induce variable effects on mite mortality and fecundity. Application with cell-free supernatant of X. stokiae culture resulted in both the highest mite mortality rate [(89.00±3.60)%] and the lowest mite fecundity [(41.33±23.69) eggs/gravid female]. Whole cell suspension of X. stokiae isolate PB09 culture was found to be slightly less effective than its cell-free supernatant, suggesting that X. stokiae was more likely to release its metabolites with acaricidal activities to the surrounding culture media. Crude cell extract of X. stokiae was not effective against mites. Cell-free supernatant of X. stokiae isolate PB09 was the most effective biological control agent and it could be conveniently used in future formulations instead of live bacteria.
Keywords: Xenorhabdus, Luciaphorus, Whole cell suspension, Cell-free supernatant, Crude cell extract, Mushroom mite
1. Introduction
Luciaphorus sp. (Acari: Pygmephoridae) is a mushroom mite that has become one of the major threats to the large-scale cultivations of several mushroom species, including Lentinus squarrosulus (Mont.) Singer, Lentinus polychrous Lev., Auricularia auricula-judae (Bull.) Wettst., and Flammulina velutipes Karst. (Bussaman et al., 2004). The use of insecticides, such as carbamates and organophosphates, to control this mushroom mite has had little success, and growers can only manage this pest by maintaining the recommended routine horticultural hygiene procedures (Bussaman et al., 2009).
Biological agents, so-called biocontrol agents, for controlling agricultural pests have been widely used for several years. This is partly due to the strict governmental regulations for the use of hazardous chemicals, as these chemicals can remain protractedly in the food chain (Bro-Rasmussen, 1996). The entomopathogenic nematodes of the genera Steinernema and Heterorhabditis have been found to cause the death of several important agricultural insect pests (Chongchitmate et al., 2005; Grewal et al., 2005). In addition, the bacteria Xenorhabdus sp. and Photorhabdus sp., living symbiotically in the specialized intestinal vesicles of Steinernema and midgut of the intestines of Heterorhabditis nematodes, respectively, are known to contribute to nematodes’ pathogenicity (Gaugler, 2002). After the nematodes (in infective juvenile stage) enter the host insects through natural insect openings, the bacteria are released from nematodes’ intestine and enter the host insect haemolymph system. The bacteria then start to replicate rapidly and cause septicemia and cellular apoptosis, leading to death of the host insect (Cho and Kim, 2004; Campos-Herrera et al., 2009).
Both Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria have been shown to grow successfully under laboratory conditions, and both cell suspensions and cell-free supernatants of these bacteria have been found to cause adverse effect and cause the death of several insect pests, such as desert locust [Schistocerca gregaria (Forskål)] (Mahar et al., 2004), red flour beetle [Tribolium castaneum (Herbst)] (Shrestha and Kim, 2010), wax moth [Galleria mellonella (L.)], beet armyworm [Spodoptera exigua (Hübner)], diamondback moth [Plutella xylostella (L.)], cotton leafworm moth [Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval)] (Campos-Herrera et al., 2009), and black vine weevil [Otiorhynchus sulcatus Germar] (Mahar et al., 2008). Hence, these bacteria secrete their metabolic products that are toxic or immunosuppressive to the host insects (Bowen et al., 2000; Sharma et al., 2002; Mahar et al., 2004; 2008; Bode, 2009; Brivio et al., 2010). Moreover, Xenorhabdus sp. and Photorhabdus sp. have been used for controlling Luciaphorus sp., a mushroom mite that has been known to damage several mushroom species (Bussaman et al., 2006; 2009).
Herein, this study was aimed to determine the acaricidal activity of Xenorhabdus stokiae isolate PB09 against a mushroom mite (Luciaphorus sp.).
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Bacteria, mushroom culture, and mites
X. stokiae isolate PB09 was isolated from surface-sterilized infective juveniles of Steinernema siamkayai nematode obtained from the Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives Thailand, using a method previously described (Kaya and Stock, 1997). A nutrient bromothymol blue triphenyltetrazolium chloride agar (NBTA) medium, consisting of 37 g nutrient agar (Criterion, USA), 25 mg bromothymol blue powder (Lab-Chem, UK), 4 ml of 0.01 g/ml 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and 1 000 ml distilled water, was used to select the genus Xenorhabdus (Lacey, 1997). The bacteria were spread onto NBTA plates, and the plates were sealed and incubated in the dark at 28 °C for 24 h. These bacteria were found to form blue colonies on NBTA agar (indicated Phase I stage) (Stock et al., 1998; Grewal et al., 2005) and the colonies were selected and sub-cultured to acquire colonies with uniform characteristics. The selected colonies were individually grown in 25 ml of Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and placed in the incubator shaker (200 r/min) at 28 °C for 48 h under complete darkness (Lacey, 1997). The concentration of whole bacterial cell suspension was determined by the plate-count technique (Klement et al., 1990) and adjusted to 108 colony-forming units per ml (CFU/ml) using sterile 1 g/L peptone solution. To obtain cell-free supernatant, cell suspension was centrifuged at 2 500×g and 4 °C for 5 min and filtered using a 0.22-μm filter. The resulting bacterial pellets were collected and used for extraction of crude cell extract. A total of 10 ml of LB broth was added to 0.1 g (approximately 109 cells) of bacterial pellets and then placed in a sonicator at 4 °C for 5 min to break the cells before centrifugation at 2 500×g and 4 °C for 5 min, to collect crude cell extract at the top of solution.
Lentinus squarrosulus, obtained from the Mushroom Researchers and Growers Society of Thailand, was grown on a mixture of sawdust and sorghum grain to establish a fresh spawn (Bussaman et al., 2009). Mushroom mycelia were then inoculated to potato dextrose agar (PDA, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) plates and incubated at 25 °C in the dark for further experiments.
Luciaphorus mites were collected from infested L. squarrosulus basidiocarps obtained from the Rapeephan mushroom farm in Khon Kaen Province, northeast Thailand. A fresh L. squarrosulus spawn in a glass bottle was used to maintain a pair of male and female mites at 28 °C for reproduction. These in-house bred mites were used for all of the experiments.
2.2. Effects of X. stokiae isolate PB09 on mortality of Luciaphorus sp.
Acaricidal activities of X. stokiae isolate PB09 were investigated using 50-mm plastic Petri-dish plates containing L. squarrosulus mycelia grown on PDA, as previously described by Bussaman et al. (2009). One hundred adult Luciaphorus female mites (1 d old) were transferred to each of these 50-mm plastic Petri-dish plates. A total of 500 µl of bacterial whole cell suspension (1×108 CFU/ml), cell-free supernatant, or crude cell extract was then sprayed onto the L. squarrosulus mycelia and mushroom mites. The same volumes of LB broth and propargite (a commercial acaricide) at the concentration of 0.04% were used as negative and positive control groups, respectively (four replications/treatment). All plates were covered with lids and placed in a growth chamber at 28 °C and 80% relative humidity in complete darkness. Mite mortality was monitored every 24 h for five consecutive days after treatment. The experiment was repeated twice.
2.3. Effects of X. stokiae isolate PB09 on progeny production of Luciaphorus sp.
The bacterial cell suspension (1×108 CFU/ml), cell-free supernatant, and crude cell extract were tested against Luciaphorus mites as described above (four replications/treatment). All plates were covered and placed in a growth chamber at 28 °C and 80% relative humidity in the dark. Five days after the treatment, all living pregnant females were excised using sterile needle and number of eggs/gravid female and the gender of progeny mites were recorded. The experiment was repeated twice.
2.4. Statistical analysis
The data on the percentage of mite mortality were arcsine transformed before analysis. A general linear-model procedure [one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA] was used to perform analysis of the treatments. Significant differences between means of the treatment were determined using the least significant difference (LSD) test at P≤0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Effects of X. stokiae isolate PB09 on mortality of Luciaphorus sp.
Different parts of X. stokiae isolate PB09 culture were found to induce mortality of Luciaphorus mite at different levels (Table 1). For all the bacterial treatments, the percentages of mite mortality reached a maximum on Day 3 post-treatment and remained unchanged thereafter. Cell-free supernatant of X. stokiae isolate PB09 caused the highest mortality of mites up to (89.00±3.60)%, which was not significantly different from that caused by whole cell suspension [(81.66±2.88)%]. Crude cell extract of X. stokiae isolate PB09 induced mite mortality [(30.00±5.77)%] to a level significantly lower than cell-free supernatant, whole cell suspension, and propargite. No dead mites were observed after application with LB broth.
Table 1.
Treatment | Mite mortality (%) |
||||
Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | |
Whole cell suspension | 42.66±6.80cB | 58.33±16.07bA | 81.66±2.88bA | 81.66±2.88bA | 81.66±2.88bA |
Cell-free supernatant | 55.00±5.00bA | 71.66±7.63bA | 89.00±3.60bA | 89.00±3.60bA | 89.00±3.60bA |
Crude cell extract | 23.00±5.77dA | 28.00±0.00cA | 30.00±5.77cA | 30.00±5.77cA | 30.00±5.77cA |
Propargite* | 100.00±0.00aA | 100.00±0.00aA | 100.00±0.00aA | 100.00±0.00aA | 100.00±0.00aA |
LB broth | 0.00±0.00eA | 0.00±0.00dA | 0.00±0.00dA | 0.00±0.00dA | 0.00±0.00dA |
Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD). Means within the same column followed by the same lower case letters are not significantly different (P(0.05) as compared by LSD test; Means within the same row followed by the same upper case letters are not significantly different (P(0.05) as compared by LSD test
Propargite is a commercial acaricide
3.2. Effects of X. stokiae isolate PB09 on progeny production of Luciaphorus sp.
The reproduction of Luciaphorus mite was found to decline after application with X. stokiae isolate PB09 (Table 2). Both cell-free supernatant and whole cell suspension of X. stokiae isolate PB09 significantly reduced mite fecundity, accounting for (41.33±23.69) and (192.67±11.01) eggs/female, respectively, when compared to the treatment with LB broth [(256.00±19.69) eggs/female]. Furthermore, cell-free supernatant could reduce the number of eggs/female to a level significantly lower than whole cell suspension. In addition, the male:female ratios of mite progeny showed that the number of female offspring was much reduced by applications with cell-free supernatant and whole cell suspension, accounting for 1:4.63 and 1:8.17 male:female, respectively. In contrast, crude cell extract of X. stokiae isolate PB09 showed no effect on mite fecundity [(228.00±23.06) eggs/female] or male:female ratio (1:16.53), similar to LB broth [(256.00±19.69) eggs/female and 1:16.06, respectively]. Also, no mushroom mites were found to survive after propargite application; hence, no fecundity was recorded.
Table 2.
Treatment | Fecundity# (egg/female) | Egg hatching# |
Male:female ratio | |
Male | Female | |||
Whole cell suspension | 192.67±11.01b | 21.00±6.55a | 171.66±12.58c | 1:8.17 |
Cell-free supernatant | 41.33±23.69c | 7.33±2.31cd | 34.00±7.54d | 1:4.63 |
Crude cell extract | 228.00±23.06a | 13.00±3.46bc | 215.00±13.23b | 1:16.53 |
Propargite* | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00d | 0.00±0.00e | 0:0.00 |
LB broth | 256.00±19.69a | 15.00±5.00ab | 241.00±8.54a | 1:16.06 |
Data are expressed as mean±SD. Means within the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (P(0.05) as compared by LSD test
Propargite is a commercial acaricide
4. Discussion
Different parts of X. stokiae isolate PB09 culture, particularly cell-free supernatant and whole cell suspension, demonstrated harmful effects on Luciaphorus mortality and fecundity. The mite mortality rate caused by whole cell suspension of X. stokiae isolate PB09 in this study was similar to that of Xenorhabdus sp. X1 previously published (Bussaman et al., 2009). Also, a decrease of fecundity caused by whole cell suspension of X. stokiae isolate PB09 in this study was equivalent to that in a previous report (Bussaman et al., 2009). These results may indicate that whole cell suspension of X. stokiae isolate PB09 in the current study is as effective as the previous one. These high mortality rates caused by X. stokiae isolate PB09 suggest that X. stokiae can transmit horizontally (most likely by direct contact) between infected mites that come in contact with uninfected ones. Moreover, the decrease of fecundity and the changes in sex ratios of mites caused by X. stokiae isolate PB09 infection may indicate vertical transmission of X. stokiae between pregnant females and their offspring, resulting in sexual bias of their offspring. There are some reports of other microorganisms that have produced similar effects on mites, such as Microsporidium phytoseiuli against Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and Wolbachia bacteria against Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Bjørnson and Keddie, 2001; Vala et al., 2004). However, more experiments are required to verify the effects of X. stokiae isolate PB09 on Luciaphorus mites.
Cell-free supernatant of X. stokiae isolate PB09 in this study was shown to induce both higher mite mortality and lower mite fecundity than the whole cell suspension. This may suggest that metabolites with insecticidal properties that were produced by X. stokiae isolate PB09 are more likely to be secreted to culture supernatant. Mahar et al. (2005) also found that X. nematophila cell-free metabolites required 4 d to kill 95% G. mellonella larvae whereas cell suspension needed up to 6 d to induce 93% mortality. There are several reports indicated that Xenorhabdus sp. could produce and secrete several secondary metabolites with effective bioactivities such as benzylideneacetone (antibacterial compound), iodinine, phenethylamides, indole derivatives, xenorhabdins, xenorxides, and xenocoumacins (antibiotics), and primary metabolites, such as alkaline protease (Morgan et al., 2001; Caldas et al., 2002; Ji et al., 2004; Mohamed, 2007; Bode, 2009), whereby all of which are suggested to play roles as insecticidal and immunosuppressive compounds. In contrast, crude cell extract of X. stokiae isolate PB09 had very little effect on mite mortality or fecundity. This is probably due to the loss of important metabolites of bacterial crude cell extract during the extraction process, or they have simply never been present.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, different parts of X. stokiae isolate PB09 culture produced different effects on Luciaphorus mortality and fecundity. As X. stokiae cell-free supernatant was shown to be more effective than its whole cell suspension, this may suggest that X. stokiae isolate PB09 is more likely to secrete its metabolites with acaricidal activities to the surrounding culture media. This is considered to be important for future formulation of X. stokiae isolate PB09 as an environmental- and user-friendly biological control agent. More experiments are required to investigate the appropriate formulas and their effects under field conditions.
Acknowledgments
Our gratitude goes to Prof. Sunha PANICHAJAYAKUL, the owner of the Rapeephan mushroom farm, for providing the mushroom mites, and Mrs. Vatcharee SOMSOOK of Department of Agriculture, Thailand for providing entomopathogenic nematodes for this study.
Footnotes
Project (No. RTA 4880006) supported by the Thailand Research Fund, Kasetsart University and Mahasarakham University
References
- 1.Bjørnson S, Keddie BA. Disease prevalence and transmission of Microsporidium phytoseiuli infecting the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) J Invertebr Pathol. 2001;77(2):114–119. doi: 10.1006/jipa.2001.5008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bode HB. Entomopathogenic bacteria as a source of secondary metabolites. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2009;13(2):224–230. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bowen D, Blackburn M, Rocheleau T, Grutzmacher C, Ffrench-Constant RH. Secreted proteases from Photorhabdus luminescens: separation of the extracellular proteases from the insecticidal Tc toxin complexes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2000;30(1):69–74. doi: 10.1016/S0965-1748(99)00098-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brivio MF, Mastore M, Nappi AJ. A pathogenic parasite interferes with phagocytosis of insect immunocompetent cells. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010;34(9):991–998. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bro-Rasmussen F. Contamination by persistent chemicals in food chain and human health. Sci Total Environ. 1996;188:S45–S60. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(96)05276-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bussaman P, Chandrapatya A, Sermswan RW, et al. Morphology, Biology and Behavior of the Genus Pygmephorus (Acari: Heterostigmata), a New Parasite of Economic Edible Mushroom; Proceeding of XXII International Congress of Entomology; 15-21 August; Brisbane, Australia. Carillon Conference Management Pty Ltd.; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bussaman P, Sermswan RW, Grewal PS. Toxicity of the entomopathogenic bacteria Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus to the mushroom mite (Luciaphorus sp.; Acari: Pygmephoridae) Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2006;16(3):245–256. doi: 10.1080/09583150500335822. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bussaman P, Sobanboa S, Grewal PS, Chandrapatya A. Pathogenicity of additional strains of Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus (Enterobacteriaceae) to the mushroom mite Luciaphorus perniciosus (Acari: Pygmephoridae) Appl Entomol Zool. 2009;44(2):293–299. doi: 10.1303/aez.2009.293. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Caldas C, Pereira A, Cherqui A, Simoes N. Purification and characterization of an extracellular protease from Xenorhabdus nematophila involved in insect immunosuppression. Appl Environ Microb. 2002;68(3):1297–1304. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1297-1304.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Campos-Herrera R, Tailliez P, Pages S, Ginibre N, Gutierrez C, Boemare NE. Characterization of Xenorhabdus isolates from La Rioja (Northern Spain) and virulence with and without their symbiotic entomopathogenic nematodes (Nematoda: Steinernematidae) J Invertebr Pathol. 2009;102(2):173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cho S, Kim YH. Hemocyte apoptosis induced by entomopathogenic bacteria, Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus, in Bombyx mori . J Asia-Pacific Entomol. 2004;7(2):195–200. doi: 10.1016/S1226-8615(08)60215-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chongchitmate P, Somsook V, Hormchan P, Visarathanonth N. Bionomics of entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema siamkayai Stock, Somsook and Reid (n. sp.) and its efficacy against Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Kasetsart J (Nat Sci) 2005;39(3):431–439. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gaugler R. Entomopathogenic Nematology. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CABI Publishing, CAB International; 2002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grewal PS, Ehlers RU, Shapiro-Ilan DI. Nematodes as Biocontrol Agents. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CABI Publishing, CAB International; 2005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ji D, Yi Y, Kang GH, Choi YH, Kim P, Baek NI, Kim Y. Identification of an antibacterial compound, benzylideneacetone, from Xenorhabdus nematophila against major plant-pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;239(2):241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.08.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kaya HK, Stock SP. Techniques in Insect Nematology. In: Lacey LA, editor. Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology. London, UK: Academic Press; 1997. pp. 281–324. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Klement Z, Rudolph K, Sands DC, editors. Budapest, Hungary: Academiai Kiado; 1990. Method in Phytobacteriology; pp. 99–100. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lacey LA. Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology: Biological Techniques Series. San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press; 1997. pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mahar AN, Munir M, Mahar AQ. Studies of different application methods of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus cells and their toxin in broth solution to control locust (Schistocerca gregaria) Asian J Plant Sci. 2004;3(6):690–695. doi: 10.3923/ajps.2004.690.695. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mahar AN, Munir M, Elawad S, Gowen SR, Hague NGM. Pathogenicity of bacterium, Xenorhabdus nematophila isolated from entomopathogenic nematode (Steinernema carpocapsae) and its secretion against Galleria mellonella larvae. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B. 2005;6(6):457–463. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2005.B0457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mahar AN, Jan ND, Mahar GM, Mahar AQ. Control of insects with entomopathogenic bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and its toxic secretions. Int J Agric Biol. 2008;10(1):52–56. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mohamed MA. Purification and characterization of an alkaline protease produced by the bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila BA2, a symbiont of entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae . Res J Agric Biol Sci. 2007;3(5):510–521. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Morgan JA, Sergeant M, Ellis D, Ousley M, Jarrett P. Sequence analysis of insecticidal gene from Xenorhabdus nematophila PME1296. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(5):2062–2069. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.5.2062-2069.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sharma S, Waterfield N, Bowen D, Rocheleau T, Holland L, James R, Ffrench-Constant R. The lumicins: novel bacteriocins from Photorhabdus luminescens with similarity to the uropathogenic-specific protein (USP) from uropathogenic Escherichia coli . FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;214(2):241–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shrestha S, Kim Y. Differential pathogenicity of two entomopathogenic bacteria, Photorhabdus temperata subsp. temperata and Xenorhabdus nematophila against the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum . J Asia-Pacific Entomol. 2010;13(3):209–213. doi: 10.1016/j.aspen.2010.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stock SP, Somsook V, Reid AP. Steinernema siamkayai n. sp. (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), an entomopathogenic nematode from Thailand. Syst Parasitol. 1998;41(2):105–113. doi: 10.1023/A:1006087017195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vala F, Egas M, Sabelis MW. Wolbachia affects oviposition and mating behavior of its spider mite host. J Evol Biol. 2004;17(3):692–700. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00679.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]