Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 22;33(4):835–840. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs093

Table IV.

LD between significant SNPs and index SNPs in different populations

Region SNP pair The present study
The HapMap project
AA
BB
NG
CEU
CHB
YRI
r2 D′ r2 D′ r2 D′ r2 D′ r2 D′ r2 D′
6q25.1 rs2046210–rs9397435 0.06 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.04 1.00
10q26 rs2981578–rs1219648 0.13 0.98 0.08 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.32 0.83 0.06 1.00
rs2981578–rs2981582 0.16 0.99 0.08 0.94 0.05 0.90 0.85 1.00 0.15 0.67 0.08 1.00
rs1219648–rs2981582 0.38 0.67 0.37 0.67 0.31 0.63 1.00 1.00 0.64 0.93 0.28 0.60
16q12 rs3803662–rs3104793 0.08 0.33 0.15 0.50 0.35 0.87 0.14 0.53 0.44 0.89 0.49 0.81

AA, African American; BB, Barbadian; CEU, Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry from the CEPH collection; CHB, Han Chinese in Beijing, China; JPT, Japanese in Tokyo, Japan; NG, Nigerian; YRI, Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria.