Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar 21;48(7):1014–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.066

Relative telomere length: a novel non-invasive biomarker for the risk of non-cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection

Xiaoying Fu 1,*, Shaogui Wan 1,*, Hie-Won Hann 2,3, Ronald E Myers 1, Richard S Hann 2, Jennifer Au 3, Bicui Chen 1, Jinliang Xing 4, Hushan Yang 1,**
PMCID: PMC3324593  NIHMSID: NIHMS361373  PMID: 22444598

Abstract

Background and Aims

Telomere length has emerged as a promising risk predictor of various cancers including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the majority of studies in this area measured telomere length in hepatocytes and one in lymphocytes with conflicting results. Moreover, no studies have been reported on using circulating DNA telomere length as a non-invasive HCC biomarker.

Methods

We conducted a nested case-control study to determine the relative telomere length (RTL) in serum DNA from 140 HBV-related HCC cases and 280 frequency-matched cancer-free HBV controls.

Results

Cases had a significantly longer RTL (median, 0.31; range, 0.02–2.31) than controls (median, 0.20; range, 0.01–1.60) (P=0.003). Consistently, longer RTLs conferred a significantly increased HCC risk compared to short RTLs in a univariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio [OR]=1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.02–2.33, P=0.038). This association attenuated after multivariate adjustment (OR=1.40, 95% CI=0.90–2.19, P=0.132). In a quartile analysis, a significant dose-response relationship was noted in univariate analysis (Ptrend=0.017) which was again attenuated in multivariate analysis (Ptrend=0.079). Further analyses revealed that the significant association between serum RTL and HCC risk was evident in non-cirrhotic (OR=3.54, 95% CI 1.58–7.93 P=0.002), but not cirrhotic (OR=0.95, 95% CI 0.55–1.64, P=0.860) HBV patients. Moreover, the significantly increased HCC risk conferred by cirrhosis was modulated by RTL with a significant interaction effect (Pinteraction=0.013).

Conclusions

RTL in circulating cell-free serum DNA could potentially be used as a novel non-invasive biomarker for non-cirrhotic HCC. Prospective cohort studies are warranted to validate this finding and assess its clinical significance in HCC prevention.

Keywords: telomere length, cirrhosis, HBV, HCC, serum

INTRODUCTION

In the United States, the incidence of new acute HBV infection decreased over the past two decades, however, the number of patients living with chronic HBV infection has grown significantly. This development is partly due to the trend of increasing immigration from areas with high HBV endemicity such as Asian and Sub-Arab countries [1]. Among the more than 40 million Americans born outside of the United States, about 1.5 million have chronic HBV infection. Moreover, over 60% of current HBV patients in the United States are relatively young and as these patients age, significant increases in HBV-induced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and corresponding medical costs are expected [1]. Thus, continuous monitoring of these patients and identification of high-risk individuals for more targeted and intensive intervention are important to the reduction of HBV-induced burden.

Telomeres consist of small tandem nucleotide repeats (TTAGGG in humans) that form the physical ends of eukaryotic chromosomes [2]. The main function of telomeres is to stabilize the linear chromosome ends and protect them from degradation and other insults resulting from DNA damage response as well as end-to-end fusion [3,4]. Due to the end replication inefficiency of DNA polymerase, telomeres shorten by 50 to 200 base pairs within each cell division cycle in normal somatic cells [5]. When the shortening of telomeres reaches a critical point, loss of telomere protection will lead to replicative senescence and/or apoptosis in normal cells, which in turn prevents tumor initiation caused by genomic instability [6,7]. In addition to the end replication issue, other factors such as oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and loss of telomere binding proteins may also contribute to telomere shortening and lead to the tumorigenesis of many solid cancers including HCC [810]. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated a significant correlation between decreased telomere length of tissue DNAs and promotion of hepatocarcinogenesis [1114].

Recently, Liu et al. conducted a case-control study in a Chinese population and reported that longer telomeres in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) conferred an increased risk of HCC [15]. This finding was consistent with several epidemiologic reports indicating a positive correlation between longer telomere length in blood cells and a greater susceptibility to breast cancer [16], melanoma [17], and non-Hodgkin lymphoma [18], whereas contradictory findings of other studies demonstrated an association between shorter telomeres and an increased risk of various cancers [19]. In HCC, mounting evidence has substantiated the correlation between short telomere length in liver tissues and increased cancer risk [20]. These paradoxical findings regarding telomere length in cancer predisposition suggest that the previously observed associations might be tissue and/or tumor specific and further evaluation is warranted.

Biomarkers based on circulating cell-free serum or plasma samples have unique advantages over other specimens due to their non-invasive nature, especially in prospective studies with extended followed-up periods with only serum or plasma samples collected at study initiation. Circulating serum DNA as a non-invasive predictive, diagnostic, and prognostic biomarker has been extensively investigated in many cancers [2123]. In the current study, we sought to evaluate the association between serum DNA telomere length and the risk of HBV-related HCC (HBV-HCC) using a nested case-control approach in a clinic-based cohort of Korean HBV patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

The subjects in this study were selected from an existing and ongoing clinic-based cohort. The patients were consecutively enrolled from those who visited the Liver Disease Prevention Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital for treatment of liver diseases, such as chronic HBV or HCV infection, fibrosis, cirrhosis, or HCC. There were no restrictions on age, sex, ethnicity, and disease etiology in patient enrollment. Enrollment started in 1988 and is ongoing. As of October 2010, the cohort included more than 2600 patients, of which 90% were of Korean ancestry. More than 90% of the patients in this cohort had HBV infection. To minimize confounding effects from disease etiology and ethnicity, we restricted the current study to Korean HBV patients. This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Thomas Jefferson University.

Epidemiologic and clinical data collection

Demographic and clinical data were obtained for each patient through medical chart review and consulting with the treating physicians. Demographic variables collected in this research included age, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, drinking status, cirrhosis, and family history of cancer. An individual who smoked more than 100 cigarettes in lifetime was defined as an ever smoker, otherwise as a never smoker. Never drinkers were defined as those who never consumed alcohol or consumed less than or equal to one drink per month. Ever drinkers were those who consumed more than one drink per month. Liver cirrhosis and HCC were determined by the combined use of clinical diagnosis and imaging studies (ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging). A blood sample was drawn for each participant for clinical laboratory testing, and the remaining serum sample was stored at −80 °C for research purposes.

Measurement of relative telomere length

Circulating cell-free serum DNA was extracted from a 200 μL serum sample using QIAamp DNA Blood Mini kit (Qiagen, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The relative telomere length (RTL) of each DNA sample was determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) using a protocol described by Cawthon [24], which measured the ratio of the copy number of telomere repeats to the copy number of a human single copy gene, 36B4, with minor modifications. Briefly, the PCR reaction (10 μL) for the telomere or36B4 amplification consisted of 1 X SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 200 nmol/L each telomere or 36B4 specific primers, and 2 μL purified serum DNA sample. The thermal cycling conditions for both telomere and 36B4 were 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 seconds and 58 °C for 1 min with signal collection. The primer sequences were as follows: forward telomere primer (Tel-1), 5′-CGGTTGTTTGGGTTTGGGTTTGGGTTTGGGTTTGGGTT-3′; reverse telomere primer (Tel-2), 5′-GGCTTGCCTTACCCTTACCCTTACCCTTACCCTTACCCT-3′; forward human 36B4 primer, 5′-CAGCAAGTGGGAAGGTGTAATCC-3′; reverse human 36B4 primer, 5′-CCCATTCTATCATCAACGGGTACAA-3′. All samples were assayed in duplicate on a 0.1 mL fast plate using a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, CA). The same negative controls and calibrator DNAs were included on each plate for quality control and calibration of PCR efficiency. A reference DNA sample was used to construct a standard curve for RTL measurement on each plate. The reference DNA was extracted from 5 ml pooled serum from 25 randomly selected patients. For each standard curve, the reference DNA sample was diluted using a 3-fold increment per dilution to produce a seven-point standard curve, between 40 and 0.05 ng DNA in each reaction. The R2 for each standard curve was ≥0.98, with acceptable standard deviation set at 0.25 (for the Ct values). If the RTL data for a tested sample was found to be out of the acceptable range of the standard curve, the sample was repeated.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS software version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The differences in the distribution of host characteristics between cases and controls were compared using the chi-square test for categorical variables, and the Student’s t test for continuous variables. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate the differences of RTL between cases and controls. RTL was analyzed as categorical variable based on a cut-off point at the median, tertile, or quartile value of the control group. The association between RTL and HCC risk was estimated using unconditional univariate and multivariate logistic regressions to determine the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs), respectively, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The multivariate analysis controlled for age, sex, smoking status, drinking status, cirrhosis, and family history of cancer, where appropriate. The test for interaction between demographic factors and RTL on HCC risk was conducted by including a cross-product term into the logistic regression model. All statistical tests were two sided, and P<0.05 was considered as the threshold of statistical significance.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics of the study subjects

The distributions of patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. This study included 140HBV-HCC cases and 280cancer-free HBV controls that were 1:2 frequency-matched to cases based on age and gender. All participants were restricted to Korean HBV patients to control the confounding effect of ethnicity and HCC etiology. As shown in Table 1, there were no significant differences between cases and controls on age (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 55.3 ± 8.8 years vs. 53.7 ± 9.6 years, respectively, P=0.099) and gender (P=0.327). No significant differences were identified between cases and controls with regard to smoking status (P=0.096) and drinking status (P=0.334). As expectedly, a significantly higher percentage of cirrhotic patients were identified in HCC cases (75.0%) versus controls (41.4%) (P<0.001). Additionally, there was a significantly higher percentage of patients with a family history of cancer among cases (47.9%) than controls (32.9%) (P=0.003).

Table 1.

Distribution of host characteristics in all cases and controls

Variable HCC Cases (n=140) HBV controls (n=280) P value
Age: Mean ± SD 55.3 ± 8.8 53.7 ± 9.6 0.099
Gender
 Female 22 (15.7) 55 (19.6)
 Male 118 (84.3) 225 (80.4) 0.327
Smoking status
Never 69 (49.3) 162 (57.9)
Ever 71 (50.7) 118 (42.1) 0.096
Drinking status
Never 67 (47.9) 148 (52.9)
Ever 73 (52.1) 132 (47.1) 0.334
Cirrhosis
 No 35 (25.0) 164 (58.6)
 Yes 105 (75.0) 116 (41.4) < 0.001
Family cancer
 No 73 (52.1) 188 (67.1)
 Yes 67 (47.9) 92 (32.9) 0.003

The distribution of RTL in cases and controls by host characteristics

As shown in Table 2, the overall serum DNA RTL was significantly longer in HCC cases than in cancer-free HBV controls [median, 0.31 (range, 0.02–2.31) vs. median, 0.20 (range, 0.01–1.60), P=0.003]. We further conducted a stratified analysis to evaluate the RTL distribution differences between cases and controls by host characteristics. The differences of RTL between cases and controls remained at least borderline significant in patients regardless of age, smoking status, and drinking status. In comparison, the difference was only evident in males (P=0.001) but not females (P=0.757), in non-cirrhotic patients (P=0.007) but not cirrhotic patients (P=0.423), and in patients without a family history of cancer (P=0.002) but not in those with a family history of cancer (P=0.264). Moreover, we also compared the RTL differences between the strata of each variable in cases and controls separately, and identified a significant difference between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic HBV controls. The median (range) of RTL was 0.28 (0.01–1.60) and 0.18 (0.01–1.11) in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic HBV controls, respectively (P=0.004) (Table 2).

Table 2.

RTL distribution by host characteristics in cases and controls

Variable RTL: Median (Range)
P value
HCC cases (n=140) HBV controls (n=280)
Overall 0.31 (0.02–2.31) 0.20 (0.01–1.60) 0.003
Age, y
 ≤ 54.1 0.32 (0.02–2.22) 0.22 (0.02–1.15) 0.071
 > 54.1 0.30 (0.02–2.31) 0.18 (0.01–1.60) 0.016
P value 0.998 0.414
Gender
 Female 0.28 (0.02–2.22) 0.26 (0.01–1.60) 0.757
 Male 0.32 (0.02–2.31) 0.19 (0.01–1.15) 0.001
P value 0.866 0.102
Smoking status
 Never 0.29 (0.02–2.30) 0.20 (0.01–1.60) 0.045
 Ever 0.32 (0.02–2.31) 0.21 (0.02–1.15) 0.021
P value 0.997 0.674
Drinking status
 Never 0.28 (0.02–2.21) 0.20 (0.01–1.60) 0.077
 Ever 0.34 (0.02–2.31) 0.22 (0.02–1.15) 0.011
P value 0.611 0.912
Cirrhosis
 No 0.29 (0.02–2.21) 0.18 (0.01–1.11) 0.007
 Yes 0.33 (0.02–2.31) 0.28 (0.01–1.60) 0.423
P value 0.904 0.004
Family Cancer
 No 0.34 (0.02–2.30) 0.20 (0.01–1.60) 0.002
 Yes 0.27 (0.02–2.31) 0.20 (0.01–1.35) 0.264
P value 0.120 0.947

RTL and HCC risk

We estimated the association between serum DNA RTL and the risk of HCC by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, through treating RTL as a categorical variable based on a cut off value of median, tertile or quartile distribution in cancer-free HBV controls. As shown in Table 3, individuals with longer RTL by median cut-off had a significantly increased risk of HCC in univariate analysis (unadjusted OR=1.55, 95% CI, 1.02–2.33, P=0.038), but not in multivariate analysis after adjusting all host variables including age, gender, smoking status, drinking status, cirrhosis, and family history of cancer (adjusted OR=1.40,95% CI 0.90–2.19, P=0.132). When patients were further categorized according to the tertile or quartile distribution of RTL values in controls, we found that, using the first (shortest RTL) group as reference, there was a significant dose-response relationship between longer RTL and increased HCC risk in the univariate analysis (P trend=0.013 by tertile; P trend=0.017 by quartile), which was attenuated in the multivariate analysis (P trend=0.067 by tertile; P trend=0.079 by quartile). The OR for the second or third group in the tertile analysis was 1.15 (95% CI 0.67–1.96, P=0.615) and 1.85 (95% CI 1.12–3.06, P=0.017), respectively in the univariate analysis, and 1.18 (95% CI 0.67–2.08, P=0.577) and 1.64 (95% CI 0.96–2.82, P=0.072), respectively in the multivariate analysis. Similar results were obtained in the quartile analysis (Table 3). Because we suspected that the attenuated association between RTL and HCC risk was due to a strong confounding from cirrhosis, we conducted another multivariate analysis adjusting for all other host variables but cirrhosis. The result of this analysis was similar to that of the univariate analysis: individuals with longer RTL by median cut-off had a significantly increased HCC risk (OR=1.59; 95% CI 1.04–2.42, P=0.031) and a significant dose-response effect was observed between longer RTL and increased HCC risk in the tertile and quartile analysis (Ptrend=0.007 and 0.012, respectively). The results of similar multivariate analysis without adjusting for other host characteristics including age, gender, smoking status, drinking status, and family history of cancer yielded similar results to that of the multivariate analysis adjusting all the variables (data not shown).

Table 3.

HCC risk as estimated by telomere length on HBV controls

RTL HCC cases HBV controls Unadjusted
Multivariate-adjusted1
Multivariate-adjusted2
OR (95%CI) P Value OR (95%CI) P Value OR (95%CI) P Value
By median
 Short 55 140 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Long 85 140 1.55 (1.02–2.33) 0.038 1.40 (0.90–2.19) 0.132 1.59 (1.04–2.42) 0.031
By tertile
 First tertile 35 93 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Second tertile 41 95 1.15 (0.67–1.96) 0.615 1.18 (0.67–2.08) 0.577 1.16 (0.68–2.01) 0.583
 Third tertile 64 92 1.85 (1.12–3.06) 0.017 1.64 (0.96–2.82) 0.072 1.99 (1.18–3.32) 0.009
P trend 0.013 0.067 0.007
By quartile
 First quartile 26 70 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Second quartile 29 70 1.12 (0.60–2.08) 0.732 1.26 (0.65–2.46) 0.492 1.15 (0.61–2.17) 0.665
 Third quartile 35 70 1.35 (0.73–2.47) 0.336 1.43 (0.75–2.72) 0.283 1.37 (0.74–2.54) 0.316
 Fourth quartile 50 70 1.92 (1.08–3.43) 0.027 1.72 (0.93–3.19) 0.085 2.06 (1.14–3.72) 0.017
P trend 0.017 0.079 0.012

Notes:

1

Adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, drinking status, cirrhosis and family history of cancer.

2

Adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, drinking status, and family history of cancer.

The association of RTL with HCC risk stratified by host characteristics

To further address the apparent attenuation of the association between RTL and HCC risk in the multivariate analysis, we conducted a stratified analysis to evaluate the potential modulating effect of each host variables. Consistent with the results of Tables 2 and 3, we found a significant association between long RTL and increased HCC risk in non-cirrhotic HBV patients (adjusted OR=3.54, 95%CI 1.58–7.93, P=0.002), but not in cirrhotic HBV patients (adjusted OR=0.95, 95% CI 0.55–1.64, P=0.860) (Table 4). A significant association was also observed in never drinkers (adjusted OR=1.93, 95%CI 1.04–3.60, P=0.038). In addition, borderline significant associations were observed in males (P=0.076), and patients without a family history of cancer (P=0.078) (Table 4).

Table 4.

HCC risk estimated by RTL on HBV controls stratified by host characteristics

Variable RTL (by median in controls) HCC cases HBV controls OR (95%CI)1 P value
Age, y
 ≤ 53.1 Short 27 77 1.00
Long 35 72 1.21 (0.63– 2.32) 0.574
> 53.1 Short 31 75 1.00
Long 47 56 1.64 (0.88– 3.04) 0.120
Gender
 Female Short 10 27 1.00
Long 12 28 0.96 (0.30– 3.07) 0.939
 Male Short 48 125 1.00
Long 70 100 1.55 (0.96– 2.52) 0.076
Smoking status
 Never Short 29 88 1.00
Long 40 74 1.49 (0.81– 2.76) 0.200
 Ever Short 29 64 1.00
Long 42 54 1.40 (0.73– 2.70) 0.312
Drinking status
 Never Short 28 84 1.00
Long 39 64 1.93 (1.04– 3.60) 0.038
 Ever Short 30 68 1.00
Long 43 64 1.06 (0.55– 2.06) 0.857
Cirrhosis
 No Short 12 101 1.00
Long 23 63 3.54 (1.58– 7.93) 0.002
 Yes Short 46 51 1.00
Long 59 65 0.95 (0.55– 1.64) 0.860
Family cancer
 No Short 28 101 1.00
Long 45 87 1.71 (0.94– 3.09) 0.078
 Yes Short 30 51 1.00
Long 37 41 1.21 (0.61– 2.38) 0.587

Note:

1

Adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, drinking status, cirrhosis and family history of cancer, where appropriate.

Association between cirrhosis and HCC risk modulated by serum DNA RTL

Because longer RTL conferred a significantly increased risk of HCC in non-cirrhotic but not in cirrhotic patients, we sought to evaluate whether the effect of cirrhosis on HCC risk was also modulated by RTL. As shown in Table 5, as expected, cirrhosis was significantly associated with an increased HCC risk (adjusted OR=4.11, 95% CI 2.60–6.51, P=1.48 × 10−9). This effect was much more prominent inpatients with short RTL (adjusted OR=8.04, 95% CI 3.82–16.90, P=3.89 × 10−8), compared to those with long RTL (adjusted OR=2.35, 95% CI 1.27–4.33, P=0.006). Moreover, we observed a statistically significant interaction effect between cirrhosis and RTL on the prediction of the risk of HBV-HCC (P for interaction=0.013).

Table 5.

Association of cirrhosis with the risk of HBV-HCC modulated by RTL

cirrhosis and RTL HCC cases HBV controls OR (95%CI) 1 P value
In all patients
 Non-cirrhosis 35 164 1.00
 cirrhosis 105 116 4.11 (2.60–6.51) 1.48 × 10−9
In patients with short RTL
 Non-cirrhosis 12 101 1.00
 cirrhosis 46 51 8.04 (3.82–16.90) 3.89 × 10−8
In patients with long RTL
 Non-cirrhosis 23 63 1.00
 cirrhosis 59 65 2.35 (1.27–4.33) 0.006
P for interaction 0.013

Note:

1

Adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, drinking status, and family history of cancer.

DISCUSSION

In the current study, we evaluated the association between RTL in circulating cell-free serum DNA and the risk of HBV-related HCC in a clinic-based patient population. We found that longer RTL was associated with an increased risk of HBV-HCC, an effect that was much more evident in patients without cirrhosis than those with cirrhosis. Further analysis revealed a significant interaction effect between RTL and cirrhosis in the modulation of HCC risk in HBV patients.

The use of telomere length as a potential predictor for cancer risk and prognosis has been extensively investigated during the past decade. The vast majority of these studies have been focused on evaluating telomere length in tumor tissues, whereas an increasing number of studies were conducted recently assessing this relationship through measuring telomere length in PBLs using qRT-PCR [24,25]. In HCC, many studies that measured telomere length in tumor and surrounding normal tissue yielded mixed results. The majority of these studies reported that telomere shortening was involved in hepatocarcinogenesis, while others reported that longer telomeres contribute to increased HCC risk [1113,20,2628]. In addition to these discrepant findings, these studies focused mainly on hepatic tissues, which is more reflective of the primary tumor characteristics than the genetic background of the patients. Recently, Liu et al. measured RTL in PBLs in a Chinese population, and found that longer RTL was significantly associated with an increased risk of HBV-HCC, comparing to both healthy controls and cancer-free controls with chronic liver diseases such as cirrhosis or fibrosis [15]. As a surrogate specimen for individual’s genetic background, PBL has been widely used in epidemiological studies. However, the use of PBL as a non-invasive biomarker has been limited, although they carry considerable clinical value, especially in those prospective cohort studies with several decades of clinical follow-up that collected serum or plasma samples at the time of study initiation. To the best of our knowledge, there has not been a population-based study determining the association of serum DNA telomere length with cancer risk or clinical outcome. In the current study, we measured the RTL in circulating cell-free serum DNA in a Korean American HBV-infected population, and observed a significant correlation between long RTL and increased risk of HBV-HCC. This finding is consistent with the results of the study of Liu et al. [15]. The overall median value of RTL in our study was lower than that of Liu et al., which is possibly accounted for by the difference between circulating cell-free DNA and PBL DNA. Circulating cell-free DNA is a heterogeneous mixture including DNA molecules released from various sources with broad variations in content and concentrations. It consists of DNAs from a wide spectrum of cells such as necrotic and apoptotic cells, active blood cells, and circulating tumor cells in cancer patients [22], In comparison, the DNA from PBLs is highly homogeneous and to a larger extent reflects the constitutional genetic background of the subjects.

Cirrhosis is a major risk factor for HCC and between 60–90% of patients with primary HCC have underlying cirrhosis [2931]. In our study, the increased HCC risk conferred by long serum DNA RTL was only evident in non-cirrhotic patients. This could be due to the possibility that the strong effect of cirrhosis on HCC might have overshadowed the association conferred by long telomere length in our study population. Alternatively, there may be different molecular mechanisms underlying the development of HCC with and without cirrhosis. For instance, HBV viral genome can directly integrate into the host human genome and act as an oncogenic factor, a process that is independent of the chronic inflammation that commonly characterizes cirrhosis [32]. In line with this notion, recent in vitro and in vivo studies suggested that the HBx protein, encoded by the HBV viral genome, increases both the expression of telomere reverse transcriptase and telomerase activity, the enzyme responsible for the maintenance of telomere length, thus prolonging the lifespan of hepatocytes and contributing to malignant transformation [33,34]. Partly due to these properties of HBV genome, liver cirrhosis in patients with chronic HBV infection is only present in about 60–70% of HBV-HCC cases and not a prerequisite step for tumorigenesis [35]. These lines of evidence are consistent with our data linking telomere length and the risk of non-cirrhotic HBV-HCC. However, the molecular mechanism underlying these observations still needs further investigation.

Mixed findings have been identified from the numerous studies that have extensively investigated the relationship between altered telomere length and cancer risk. Wentzensen et al. conducted a meta-analysis and found that long telomere length was associated with the increased risk of breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, but reduced risk of bladder cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, head and neck cancer, ovarian cancer, and renal cell carcinoma [19]. In HCC, our finding was consistent with the study of Liu et al., who conducted a case-control analysis in a Chinese population and reported that HCC patients had significantly longer RTL measured using DNA samples of peripheral blood leukocytes, compared to both liver disease-free normal controls and controls with chronic liver diseases such as chronic HBV infection and liver cirrhosis [15]. However, the findings are contradictory to several previous studies reporting that cancerous liver tissues had a shorter telomere length compared to paired normal tissues or non-cancerous liver tissues [14,27,36,37]. Several potential reasons may account for these discrepancies. Ours and Liu’s studies were conducted in Asians whereas almost all other studies used Caucasian subjects. It has been demonstrated there were significant racial differences in the distribution of telomere length [3840]. Whether these differences have an impact on the role of telomere length in the progression of HBV-HCC remains a task for further evaluation. Moreover, our study used circulating cell-free DNA from serum samples and Liu’s study used PBLs, whereas the majority of other studies used hepatocytes [14,27,36,37]. The RTL measurement in hepatocytes from liver tissue was more likely a reflection of the characteristics of telomere homeostasis, rather than a simple constitutive non-invasive biomarker of risk prediction measured from leukocytes or serum [15]. Consistent with this notion and the results of our study, Wiemann et al. reported that in cirrhotic patients, telomere shortening was mainly restricted to hepatocytes of cirrhotic liver tissues whereas lymphocytes and stellate cells in areas of cirrhosis had significantly longer telomere length [14]. Furthermore, telomere dysfunction has been reported to have dual roles in liver carcinogenesis. Short telomere length appears to have a tumor-initiating effect through inducing chromosomal instability [27,41]. In comparison, the elongation of telomeres by the activation of telomerase has also been reported to contribute to tumor growth and progression [20]. Various independent studies have demonstrated a significantly elevated activity of telomerase at the stage of severe liver diseases such as cirrhosis and HCC [4244], which is consistent with the findings of our and Liu’s studies that telomere length increases along with liver disease progression. Collectively, these lines of evidence indicate the requirement of a balanced state of telomere length in the normal physiological liver functions, since either extremely short or long telomeres leads to liver pathogenesis. Additional biomarker and basic studies are needed to further explain these paradoxical findings and reveal the underlying mechanisms.

The modulating effect of telomere length by environmental factors such as cigarette smoking and alcohol use have been reported in studies of HBV-HCC [15], and some other solid tumors [45,46]. In our study, we only observed a borderline significant association between an increased HCC risk with long serum RTL among never drinkers but not among ever drinkers (Table 4). In addition, no significant interaction effect was identified between RTL and smoking or drinking status (data not shown). These results may likely be explained by the adequate matching between cases and controls on smoking and drinking status. Moreover, due to the limitation of a retrospective clinic-based study, we did not have detailed data of the intensities of smoking and drinking which could also contribute to the paradoxical findings. Further larger prospectively designed cohort studies are warranted to test the cumulative and interactions effects between RTL and these environmental exposures on the risk of HCC.

A major strength of this study is the unique and highly homogenous HBV patient population. Our study is restricted to Korean American HBV patients only, eliminating the confounding effects of ethnicity and disease etiology. The vast majority of patients were infected with HBV at birth or childhood, making this population an ideal resource to study the long-term outcome of HBV infection at the population level. Strict matching criteria were implemented between cases and controls to minimize the potential confounding effects from other major risk factors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that RTL in circulating cell-free serum DNA could potentially be used as a simple, inexpensive, and non-invasive biomarker of HCC risk and the findings are highly consistent with that obtained using PBLs [15]. This proof-of-concept finding makes serum a valuable resource for RTL-based biomarker research, especially in prospective longitudinal studies that have been followed-up for extended time periods but only collected serum samples at the time of study initiation.

There are also limitations in this study. First, because of the heterogeneous nature of circulating serum DNA, the mechanism underlying the associations observed in this study remains a task for further evaluation. The finding of our study is in line with that of Liu et al. whereas contradictory to several other studies showing a positive correlation between short RTL measured in hepatocytes and an increased HCC risk. Although there have been studies indirectly showing that this discrepancy might be due to the differences between blood cells and hepatocytes, further in-depth characterizations at the molecular level will provide more definitive evidence on this issue. In addition, it is worth noting that although the average RTL was measured in this study, the determination of the longer and shorter telomere lengths would be more clinically relevant and meaningful in the identification of individuals with an increased risk of HCC. Future independent studies with more homogeneous DNA sources are needed to conduct these evaluations. Second, this study was restricted to a highly homogeneous group of Korean Americans. Although this eliminated the confounding effect of patient ethnicity, the generalizability of our findings in other ethnic groups remains to be assessed. Moreover, variations of common serum biomarkers such as alpha-fetoprotein in different ethnic groups have been indicated in previous studies [4749]. Although such ethnic difference in serum RTL has not been reported, the possibility cannot be ruled out. Therefore, validations of our findings in HBV patient populations of different ethnicities are warranted. Third, due to the nature of retrospective case-control design, our study also has the reverse-causation limitation that is inherent in most case-control studies, and may not differentiate the causal relationship between RTL alteration and HCC development. Prospective and longitudinal studies are needed to address this issue.

In conclusion, our study reported for the first time that longer RTL in circulating cell-free serum DNA was significantly associated with an increased risk of non-cirrhotic HBV-HCC, a finding that warrants further retrospective and prospective validations, in-depth molecular characterizations, and assessments to determine the clinical value in the risk prediction and early detection of HCC.

Acknowledgments

The work reported here was supported by a Tobacco Grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Health, National Cancer Institute Grants CA153099, CA152703, American Cancer Society Grant IRG 0806001, and a Research Scholar Award from the V Foundation for Cancer Research.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors of this manuscript declare a conflict of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Kim WR. Epidemiology of hepatitis B in the United States. Hepatology. 2009;49:S28–34. doi: 10.1002/hep.22975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Blackburn EH. Structure and function of telomeres. Nature. 1991;350:569–73. doi: 10.1038/350569a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blackburn EH. Telomeres. Trends Biochem Sci. 1991;16:378–81. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(91)90155-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lundblad V. DNA ends: maintenance of chromosome termini versus repair of double strand breaks. Mutat Res. 2000;451:227–40. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(00)00052-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Klapper W, Parwaresch R, Krupp G. Telomere biology in human aging and aging syndromes. Mech Ageing Dev. 2001;122:695–712. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(01)00223-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blasco MA. Telomeres and human disease: ageing, cancer and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:611–22. doi: 10.1038/nrg1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hackett JA, Greider CW. Balancing instability: dual roles for telomerase and telomere dysfunction in tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2002;21:619–26. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Houben JM, Moonen HJ, van Schooten FJ, Hageman GJ. Telomere length assessment: biomarker of chronic oxidative stress? Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;44:235–46. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gilley D, Tanaka H, Herbert BS. Telomere dysfunction in aging and cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;37:1000–13. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lechel A, Manns MP, Rudolph KL. Telomeres and telomerase: new targets for the treatment of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2004;41:491–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kitada T, Seki S, Kawakita N, Kuroki T, Monna T. Telomere shortening in chronic liver diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;211:33–9. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Urabe Y, Nouso K, Higashi T, Nakatsukasa H, Hino N, Ashida K, Kinugasa N, Yoshida K, Uematsu S, Tsuji T. Telomere length in human liver diseases. Liver. 1996;16:293–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0676.1996.tb00748.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miura N, Horikawa I, Nishimoto A, Ohmura H, Ito H, Hirohashi S, Shay JW, Oshimura M. Progressive telomere shortening and telomerase reactivation during hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1997;93:56–62. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(96)00329-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wiemann SU, Satyanarayana A, Tsahuridu M, Tillmann HL, Zender L, Klempnauer J, Flemming P, Franco S, Blasco MA, Manns MP, Rudolph KL. Hepatocyte telomere shortening and senescence are general markers of human liver cirrhosis. FASEB J. 2002;16:935–42. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0977com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu J, Yang Y, Zhang H, Zhao S, Liu H, Ge N, Yang H, Xing JL, Chen Z. Longer leukocyte telomere length predicts increased risk of hepatitis b virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A case-control analysis. Cancer. 2011 doi: 10.1002/cncr.26015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gramatges MM, Telli ML, Balise R, Ford JM. Longer relative telomere length in blood from women with sporadic and familial breast cancer compared with healthy controls. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:605–13. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Han J, Qureshi AA, Prescott J, Guo Q, Ye L, Hunter DJ, De Vivo I. A prospective study of telomere length and the risk of skin cancer. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:415–21. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lan Q, Cawthon R, Shen M, Weinstein SJ, Virtamo J, Lim U, Hosgood HD, 3rd, Albanes D, Rothman N. A prospective study of telomere length measured by monochrome multiplex quantitative PCR and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7429–33. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wentzensen IM, Mirabello L, Pfeiffer RM, Savage SA. The Association of Telomere Length and Cancer: a Meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1238–50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Satyanarayana A, Manns MP, Rudolph KL. Telomeres and telomerase: a dual role in hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatology. 2004;40:276–83. doi: 10.1002/hep.20308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gormally E, Caboux E, Vineis P, Hainaut P. Circulating free DNA in plasma or serum as biomarker of carcinogenesis: practical aspects and biological significance. Mutat Res. 2007;635:105–17. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2006.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fleischhacker M, Schmidt B. Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) and cancer--a survey. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1775:181–232. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lo YM, Chiu RW. Next-generation sequencing of plasma/serum DNA: an emerging research and molecular diagnostic tool. Clin Chem. 2009;55:607–8. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.123661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cawthon RM. Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.10.e47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Svenson U, Roos G. Telomere length as a biological marker in malignancy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792:317–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Oh BK, Kim H, Park YN, Yoo JE, Choi J, Kim KS, Lee JJ, Park C. High telomerase activity and long telomeres in advanced hepatocellular carcinomas with poor prognosis. Lab Invest. 2007;88:144–152. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Plentz RR, Caselitz M, Bleck JS, Gebel M, Flemming P, Kubicka S, Manns MP, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular telomere shortening correlates with chromosomal instability and the development of human hepatoma. Hepatology. 2004;40:80–6. doi: 10.1002/hep.20271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee YH, Oh BK, Yoo JE, Yoon SM, Choi J, Kim KS, Park YN. Chromosomal instability, telomere shortening, and inactivation of p21(WAF1/CIP1) in dysplastic nodules of hepatitis B virus-associated multi step hepatocarcinogenesis. Mod Pathol. 2009;22:1121–31. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2003;362:1907–17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14964-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fattovich G, Stroffolini T, Zagni I, Donato F. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Incidence and risk factors. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:S35–S50. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Simonetti RG, Camma C, Fiorello F, Politi F, D’Amico G, Pagliaro L. Hepatocellular carcinoma. A worldwide problem and the major risk factors. Dig Dis Sci. 1991;36:962–72. doi: 10.1007/BF01297149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Buendia MA. Hepatitis B viruses and hepatocellular carcinoma. Adv Cancer Res. 1992;59:167–226. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60306-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kew MC. Hepatitis B virus x protein in the pathogenesis of hepatitis B virus-induced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26(Suppl 1):144–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06546.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang X, Dong N, Zhang H, You J, Wang H, Ye L. Effects of hepatitis B virus X protein on human telomerase reverse transcriptase expression and activity in hepatoma cells. J Lab Clin Med. 2005;145:98–104. doi: 10.1016/j.lab.2004.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Di Bisceglie AM. Hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2009;49:S56–60. doi: 10.1002/hep.22962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Plentz RR, Park YN, Lechel A, Kim H, Nellessen F, Langkopf BH, Wilkens L, Destro A, Fiamengo B, Manns MP, Roncalli M, Rudolph KL. Telomere shortening and inactivation of cell cycle checkpoints characterize human hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatology. 2007;45:968–76. doi: 10.1002/hep.21552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hartmann D, Srivastava U, Thaler M, Kleinhans KN, N’Kontchou G, Scheffold A, Bauer K, Kratzer RF, Kloos N, Katz SF, Song Z, Begus-Nahrmann Y, Kleger A, von Figura G, Strnad P, Lechel A, Gunes C, Potthoff A, Deterding K, Wedemeyer H, Ju Z, Song G, Xiao F, Gillen S, Schrezenmeier H, Mertens T, Ziol M, Friess H, Jarek M, Manns MP, Beaugrand M, Rudolph KL. Telomerase gene mutations are associated with cirrhosis formation. Hepatology. 53:1608–17. doi: 10.1002/hep.24217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhu H, Wang X, Gutin B, Davis CL, Keeton D, Thomas J, Stallmann-Jorgensen I, Mooken G, Bundy V, Snieder H, van der Harst P, Dong Y. Leukocyte telomere length in healthy Caucasian and African-American adolescents: relationships with race sex adiposity adipokines and physical activity. J Pediatr. 158:215–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Eisenberg DT, Salpea KD, Kuzawa CW, Hayes MG, Humphries SE. Substantial variation in qPCR measured mean blood telomere lengths in young men from eleven European countries. Am J Hum Biol. 23:228–31. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Roux AV, Ranjit N, Jenny NS, Shea S, Cushman M, Fitzpatrick A, Seeman T. Race/ethnicity and telomere length in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Aging Cell. 2009;8:251–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00470.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Satyanarayana A, Wiemann SU, Buer J, Lauber J, Dittmar KE, Wustefeld T, Blasco MA, Manns MP, Rudolph KL. Telomere shortening impairs organ regeneration by inhibiting cell cycle re-entry of a subpopulation of cells. EMBO J. 2003;22:4003–13. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee JE, Oh BK, Choi J, Park YN. Telomeric 3′ overhangs in chronic HBV-related hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:264–72. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang C, Guo X, Jiang G, Zhang L, Yang Y, Shen F, Wu M, Wei L. CpG island methylator phenotype association with upregulated telomerase activity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:998–1004. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Saini N, Srinivasan R, Chawla Y, Sharma S, Chakraborti A, Rajwanshi A. Telomerase activity, telomere length and human telomerase reverse transcriptase expression in hepatocellular carcinoma is independent of hepatitis virus status. Liver Int. 2009;29:1162–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02082.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hou L, Savage SA, Blaser MJ, Perez-Perez G, Hoxha M, Dioni L, Pegoraro V, Dong LM, Zatonski W, Lissowska J, Chow WH, Baccarelli A. Telomere length in peripheral leukocyte DNA and gastric cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:3103–9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.McGrath M, Wong JY, Michaud D, Hunter DJ, De Vivo I. Telomere length, cigarette smoking, and bladder cancer risk in men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:815–9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sizaret P, Tuyns A, Martel N, Jouvenceaux A, Levin A, Ong YW, Rive J. Alpha-Fetoprotein levels in normal males from seven ethnic groups with different hepatocellular carcinoma risks. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975;259:136–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb25410.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.O’Brien JE, Dvorin E, Drugan A, Johnson MP, Yaron Y, Evans MI. Race-ethnicity-specific variation in multiple-marker biochemical screening: alpha-fetoprotein, hCG, and estriol. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:355–8. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00524-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lok AS, Sterling RK, Everhart JE, Wright EC, Hoefs JC, Di Bisceglie AM, Morgan TR, Kim HY, Lee WM, Bonkovsky HL, Dienstag JL. Des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin and alpha-fetoprotein as biomarkers for the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 138:493–502. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES