Skip to main content
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports logoLink to International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
. 2012 Feb 28;3(6):215–217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2011.12.009

Metastatic Ewing's sarcoma/PNET of kidney in 40 year old patient

Mouna Kairouani 1,, Maha Mokrim 1, Nawfel Mellas 1, Basma Khennoussi 1, Hind El M’rabti 1, Saber Boutayeb 1, Hassan Errihani 1
PMCID: PMC3324710  PMID: 22466114

Abstract

Introduction

Primary renal Ewing sarcoma/PNET is an uncommon and very aggressive tumor.

Presentation of case

: We report the case of a young woman who underwent nephrectomy for a renal mass from unknown etiology. Histologic analysis found small tumoral cells in rosette formation, and immunohistochemical staining was positive for CD99, and focally positive for vimentin and Protein S-100. A post operative abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a residual renal processus with hepatic wounds and abdominal metastatic nodes.

After 6 cycles of chemotherapy including Vincristine, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, the response was considered as good.

Discussion

Ewing's sarcoma/PNET of kidney is a member of the family of small round cell tumors and it should be differentiated from Wilms tumor, neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and lymphoblastic lymphoma. The principle management of its treatment have been extrapolated from the treatment of osseous Ewing sarcoma of bone.

Conclusion

Despite aggressive treatment, primary renal Ewing sarcoma/PNET has a poor prognosis. It requires a multidisciplinary approach including oncologists, urologists and radiation oncologists.

Keywords: PNET of kidney, Complete response

1. Introduction

The extra-osseous Ewing's sarcoma represents nearly 6% of the Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT). It was introduced initially in 1969 by Tefft who reported a series of five patients with round cell tumors that comes from the paravertebral soft tissues.1 It often involves the trunk, the extremities, the soft tissues of head and neck, and the retroperitoneum.2,3 However, renal localization is very rare and has a poor prognosis. Because of the rarity of this disease, there is no consensus concerning the treatment of renal Ewing's sarcoma/PNET.4

We report the case of a young female patient with a renal metastatic Ewing's sarcoma/PNET which was successfully managed by chemotherapy.

2. Case report

A 40 years old woman was referred to the National Institute of Oncology with severe back pain one month after a right nephrectomy, performed because of a renal mass, in a peripheral hospital. Only abdominal tenderness was found on clinical exam. There was no organomegaly and no hematuria. Histological report described macroscopically a renal mass about a renal mass measuring 190 mm × 100 mm × 90 mm, white gray, friable, with areas of necrosis and hemorrhage. Microscopic examination showed a malignant tumor composed of monomorphic cells, with slightly irregular nuclei and dense chromatin. These cells fitted together in some places forming rosettes (Fig. 1). At immunochemistry, the cells were positive for the PNET markers: CD99 and focally positive for Vimentin anticorps and protein S-100, but negative for Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), Leucocyte common antigen (LCA) and Desmine (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Renal EWS/PNET composed of small round cells with Homer–Wright rosettes in tumor (HE.G X40).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The tumor cells showed diffuse and strong membranous staining for CD99.

A post-operative abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a residual mass in the right renal space which involved liver. The mass abutted onto of the duodenum, the right psoas muscle and the right colic flexure. Peritoneal nodes and ascites were also found. The computed tomography of the thorax, the bone scintigraphy, the blood electrolytes and the renal function were all normal. The disease was staged at IV.

Our patient was treated by six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks including Vincristin 1.4 mg/m2, Adriamycine 60 mg/m2, and Cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m2. The tolerance of chemotherapy was good. The response was estimated at 90% according to the Recist guideline version 1.1. The patient was in good control for four months after the last cycle of chemotherapy.

3. Discussion

Primary renal Primitive NeuroEctodermal Tumor (PNET) is a very rare condition. The first case was reported by Seemayer et al.5 Since then, there have been about only 60 cases reported in the literature. Until now, the largest series of rPNET was published by Yuvaraja B and al. This series included 16 patients who were treated in Tata Memorial Hospital in India.6

The origin of this tumor is unknown, but it seems that it derives from cells that migrated from the neural tube, with variable capability of ectodermal or neuronal differentiation.

The median age of young adult is estimated at 28 years old (range 4–69) with a slight male predominance.7 There are no clinical specific symptoms, and the diagnosis of PNET/Ewing sarcoma of Kidney is based on histopathology.

Histologically, Ewing sarcoma/PNET is composed by monomorphic small cell rounds which form Homer right rosettes.8 Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are strongly positive for CD99 and Leukemia Virus Integration (FLI)-1.

Using a large panel of immunochemistry markers is often essential (Cytokeratine, epithelial membrane antigen, a WT1, synaptophysin, muscle specific actine, Desmine, myogenine, LCA and CD45) to exclude other round cells tumors, because of their important similarities.

Thus, histologists have to recognize other round cells tumors such as: rhabdomyosarcoma, Wilms’ tumor, neuroblastoma, clear cell sarcoma of the kidney, lymphoma, small cell variant of osteosarcoma, desmoplastic small RCT, small cell anaplastic neuroendocrine carcinoma, and nephroblastoma.9

The cytogenetics have an important role to play to confirm the diagnosis, by searching the translocation t (11; 22) (q24; q12) resulting in the production of the EWS/Friend leukemia virus integration 1 (FLI-1) fusion.10,11

There is no consensus of treatment for metastatic renal PNET because of it rarity. The treatment is extrapolated from the treatment of osseous Ewing sarcoma. It is based on combination of chemotherapy included active drugs such as Doxorubicin (A), Vincristin (V), Cyclophosphamide(C), Ifosfamide (I) and Etoposide (E). The IESS-III study published in 2003 by Grier conducted in the pediatric oncology group children's cancer group (POG-CCG) study (INT-0091), concluded that patients with non metastatic Ewing sarcoma were randomized to receive chemotherapy with either VACD alone or alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide (VACD-IE) for a total of 17 cycles. The five event free survival rate was 69% in the VACD-IE group as compared with 54% in the VACD alone group. Overall survival was also significantly better among patients in the VACD-IE group (72% vs 61% in the VACD group). However, the addition alternating cycles of Ifosfamide (I) and etoposide (E) to the VDC (vincristin, D-actinomycin, cyclophosphamide) regimen did not improve the outcome of the patients with metastases.12

Otherwise, the EURO-EWING study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiagent induction chemotherapy with six courses of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicine, and etoposide (VIDE), local treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy), and high dose therapy followed by stem cell transplantation in 281 patients with Ewing's sarcoma with primary disseminated disease. The event free survival and overall survival rates at 3 years for the entire study cohort were 27% and 34% respectively. The event free survival rates were 57% and 25% respectively for patients with complete and partial response after HDT/SCT. The relevant risk factors are the patient's age, tumor volume, and extent of metastatic spread.13

About 30–40% of patients with Ewing's sarcoma experience recurrence. The only prognostic factor identified in relapse seems to be time to relapse: patients relapsing later than 2 years from initial diagnosis have a better outcome. The treatment option for patient with relapsed or refractory disease participation in clinical trial. The guidelines proposed the following regimens: Ifosfamide with etoposide14 and carboplatine, Ifosfamide and etoposide15, docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine16, Temozolomide and irinotecan17.

Despite aggressive treatment, the prognosis of rPNET is poor. The median survival for advanced disease is only 2 years18. In the retrospective study reported by Yuvaraja (16 patients with renal PNET/Ewing sarcoma): 5 patients (31%) had metastases (2 lungs, 1 lung and lymph nodes, 1 lymph nodes, and 1 liver). The median survival was estimated at 15 months.6

In the case we report, the age of occurrence of rPNET at 40 years old which is unusual. The diagnosis of PNET/Ewing's sarcoma of the kidney was established on morphologic and immunohistochemical criteria. We could not perform molecular analysis, because of a lack of technical structures.

We tread our patient with 6 cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks including: Vincristin 1.4 mg/m2, Adriamycine 60 mg/m2 and Cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m2. The response was considered as good, and the control was kept for four months. The patient died 4 months later in the unknown circumstances.

4. Conclusion

Because of its rarity, the management of PNET/Ewing sarcoma of the kidney remains difficult, and the results are uncertain. The prognosis is poor, despite aggressive treatment. More experiences are needed to clarify the management strategy.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Funding

None.

Ethical approval

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient of the publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor in chief of this journal of request.

Author contributions

Mouna Kairouani participated in the care of the patient and wrote the article. Saber Boutayeb participated in the writing of article and validated the content. Maha MOKRIM and Nawfal Mellas participated in the care of the patient. Hind El M’rabti and Hassan Errihani: validated content and form of the article all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  • 1.Tefft M., Vawter G.F., Mitus A. Paravertebral round cell tumors in children. Radiology. 1969;92:1501–1509. doi: 10.1148/92.7.1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coffin C.M., Dehner L.P. Neurogenic tumors of soft tissue. In: Coffin C.M., Dehner L.P., O'Shea P.A., editors. Pediatric soft tissue tumors: a clinical, pathological and therapeutic approach. Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore, MD, USA: 1997. pp. 80–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Venkitaraman R., George M.K., Ramanan S.G., Sagar T.G. A single institution experience of combined modality management of extra skeletal Ewings sarcoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2007;5(3):1–4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parham D.M., Roloson G.J., Feely M. Primary malignant neuroepithelial tumors of the kidney: a clinicopathologic analysis of 146 adult and pediatric cases from the National Wilm's Tumor Study Group Pathology Center. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:133–146. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200102000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Seemayer T.A., Thelmo W.L., Bolande R.P. Peripheral neuroectodermal tumors. Perspect Pediatr Pathol. 1975;2:151–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yuvaraja B., Thyavihally, Hemant B., Tongaonkar, Gupta S., Kurkure P.A., Amare P., Muckaden M.A., Desai S.B. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney: a single institute series of 16 Patients. Urology. 2008;71:292–296. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bing Z., Zhang P., Tomaszewski J.E., MacLennan G.T. Primary Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney. J Urol. 2009;181:1341–1342. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bernstein M., Kovar H., Michael Paulussen R., Randall L., Shuck A., Teot L.A. Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors: current management. The Oncologist. 2006;11:503–519. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-5-503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Friedrichs N., Vorreuther R., Poremba C., Schafer K.L., Böcking, Buettner R. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) in the differential diagnosis of malignant kidney tumors. Phatol Res Prac. 2002;198:563–569. doi: 10.1078/0344-0338-00303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zucman J., Delatte O., Desmaze C. Cloning and characterization of the Ewing's sarcoma and peripheral neuroepithelioma t (11;22) translocation breakpoints. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1992;5:271–277. doi: 10.1002/gcc.2870050402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.De Alava E., Gerald W.L. (Molecular biology of the Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor family. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:204–213. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.1.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grier H., Krailo M., Tarbell N. Addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to standard chemotherapy for Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:694–701. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Juergens C., Weston C., Lewis I. Safety assessment of intensive induction with vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin and etoposide (VIDE) in the treatment of Ewing tumors in the EURO-E.W.I.N.G.99 clinical trial. Pediatric Blood Cancer. 2006;47:22–29. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Miser J.S., Kinsella T.J., Triche T.J. Ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection and etoposide: an effective regimen in the treatment of recurrent sarcomas and other tumors of children and young adults. J Clin Oncol. 1987;5:1191–1198. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.8.1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Winkle P., Angiolillo A., Krailo M. Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide(ICE) reinduction chemotherapy in a large cohort of children and adolescents with recurrent/refractory sarcoma: the children's Cancer Group(CCG)experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005;44:338–347. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Navid F., Willert J.R., Mc Carville M.B. Combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in the treatment of children and young adults with refractory bone sarcoma. Cancer. 2008;113:419–425. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hunold A., Weddeling N., Paulussen M. Topotecan and cyclophosphamide in patients with refractory and relapsed Ewing tumors. Pediatric Blood Cancer. 2006;47:795–800. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Casella R., Moch H., Rochlitz C. Metastatic primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the Kidney in adults. Eur Urol. 2001;39:613–617. doi: 10.1159/000052514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Surgery Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES