Skip to main content
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica logoLink to Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
. 2012 Feb;32(1):1–11.

A review of genetic epidemiology of head and neck cancer related to polymorphisms in metabolic genes, cell cycle control and alcohol metabolism

Revisione narrativa sulla epidemiologia genetica dei polimorfismi, dei geni metabolici, dei geni del ciclo cellulare e dei geni del metabolismo dell'alcool, implicati nel rischio del cancro testa-collo

G CADONI 1,, S BOCCIA 2,3, L PETRELLI 1, P DI GIANNANTONIO 2, D ARZANI 2, A GIORGIO 1, E DE FEO 2, M PANDOLFINI 1, P GALLÌ 2, G PALUDETTI 1, G RICCIARDI 2
PMCID: PMC3324962  PMID: 22500060

SUMMARY

The purpose of this report is to review the relationship between genetic polymorphisms involved in carcinogen metabolism, alcohol metabolism and cell-cycle control with the risk of head and neck cancer. The review was performed on available studies on genetic polymorphisms and head and neck cancer (HNC) published in PubMed up to September 2011. 246 primary articles and 7 meta-analyses were published. Among these, a statistically significant association was reported for glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1), glutathione S-transferases (GSTT1) and human microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1) genes. An increased risk for HNC was also associated reported for P53 codon 72 Pro/Pro, ALDH2 and three variants of the ADH gene: ADH1B (rs1229984), ADH7 (rs1573496) and ADH1C (rs698).

KEY WORDS: Head and neck cancer, Genetic susceptibility, Genetic polymorphisms

Introduction

Head and neck cancers (HNC), including oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx are among the most common types of cancer and represent a major health problem 1. There are approximately 540,000 new cases and 271,000 deaths annually worldwide for a mortality of approximately 50%. HNC represent approximately 3% of all cancers in the United States 2, but are much more prevalent in some parts of South America (Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina) 1. Development of HNC is a multifactorial process associated with a variety of risk factors. Tobacco and alcohol consumption are established risk factors for HNC (synergistic in persons who both smoke tobacco and drink alcohol), even though other factors may affect risk 3 4. In developing countries, other factors, like betel and tobacco chewing, human papillomavirus infection or drinking hot beverages, also play an important role 1. In recent years, evidence has accumulated to support the hypothesis that diet may also play an important aetiological role in development of disease, and 10-15% of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) cases in Europe are associated with a low intake of fruit and vegetables 5-8. A family history of cancer is another important risk factor for HNC 9, which implies that genetics contributes to HNC susceptibility 10.

Materials and methods

Herein, we review the published studies concerning genetic susceptibility to HNC. A variety of genes are associated with HNC carcinogenesis, including those involved in carcinogen metabolism, alcohol metabolism, folate metabolism, DNA repair, cell-cycle control and oncogenes 2. We have focused our attention on genes involved in carcinogen metabolism, alcohol metabolism and cellcycle control.

A PubMed search was performed until to the end of September 2011. The following terms were used: head and neck and cancer (with both synonymous and plural forms), as well as the truncated words genetic*, allel*, or polymorphi*.

Results

The literature search identified the below list of genes:

  • Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1);

  • Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1);

  • Glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1);

  • Glutathione S-transferase (GSTT1);

  • Glutathione S-transferase (GSTP1);

  • N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2);

  • Human microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1);

  • Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2);

  • Alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes (ADH);

  • X-ray repair cross complementary 1 (XRCC1);

  • Xeroderma pigmentosum complementary group D (XPD);

  • Cyclin D1 (CCND1);

  • P53 tumour suppressor;

  • P73.

Tables I and II report, respectively, a summary of primary studies of genetic polymorphisms in genes involved in carcinogen metabolism, alcohol metabolism and cell-cycle control and the risk of HNC, and a summary of metaanalyses of genetic polymorphisms of the aforementioned gene classes and HNC risk.

Table I.

Summary of primary studies of genetic polymorphisms and HNC risk.

Gene and polymorphism No. of included studies
Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) 15
Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) codon 462 9
Glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1) 20
Glutathione S-transferase (GSTT1) 9
Glutathione S-transferase (GSTP1) 22
N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) 11
Human microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1) 91
Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) 8
Alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes (ADH) 12
X-ray repair cross complementary 1 (XRCC1) 2
Xeroderma pigmentosum complementary group D (XPD) 6
Cyclin D1 (CCND1) 12
P53 tumour suppressor gene 26
P73 3

Table II.

Summary of previous meta-analyses of genetic polymorphisms and HNC risk.

Gene and polymorphism Authors and year No. of studies included Associations studied OR (95%CI)
Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) codon 462 Hashibe et al., 2003 50 12 Ile/Val+Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile 1.32 (0.95-1.82)
Glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1) Hashibe et al., 2003 50
Tripathy & Roy, 2006 51
30
30
Null vs. Positive
Null vs. Positive
1.23 (1.06-1.42)
1.50 (1.21-1.87)
Glutathione S-transferase (GSTT1) Hashibe et al., 2003 50 21 Null vs. Positive 1.17 (0.98-1.40)
Glutathione S-transferase (GSTP1) Hashibe et al., 2003 50 9 Ile/Val+Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile
1.10 (0.92-1.31)
N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) Ying et al., 2011 80 7 Slow acetylators vs. cancer
Rapid acetylators vs. cancer
Y113H allele vs. cancer
0.99 (0.71-.38)
1.01 (0.72-.40)
0.86 (0.77-0.97)
Human microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1) Li et al., 2011 83 82 H139R allele vs. cancer
(RR) of H139R allele vs. cancer
1.05 (0.93-1.17)
1.34 (0.98-1.82)
XRCC1 codon 194
XRCC1 codon 399
Hu et al., 2005 149 3
4
Arg/Trp+Trp/Trp vs. Arg/Arg
Gln/Gln vs. Arg/Arg
0.85 (0.59-1.23)
1.13 (0.81-1.58)

Below we discuss the significance of each gene in the aetiology of HNC:

  • Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1), a member of the cytochrome P-450 superfamily, is a naturally ethanolinducible phase I enzyme. It is mainly involved in the metabolic activation of low molecular weight compounds such as nitrosamines and alcohol metabolism 11. The variant c2 allele, which contains a novel RsaI/PstI site in the 5'-flanking region of the CYP2E1 gene, appears to be associated with decreased enzyme activity. Ten 12-21 of the 15 studies 12-25 published before July 2007 suggested that the c1/c2 genotype of CYP2E1 may increase risk for HNC compared with the c1/c1 genotype. Results of 6 14 16 18 21 22 24 of 7 studies 13 14 16 18 21 22 24 suggested that the c2/c2 genotype may increase risk for HNC 2.

  • Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) is an important phase I enzyme that plays an essential role in the metabolic activation of major classes of pro-carcinogens such as benzopyrene, a prototypic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon 26. An Ile-Val substitution in codon 462 of CYP1A1, which is in the haem-binding region, results in a 2-fold increase in microsomal enzyme activity and, in Caucasians, is in complete linkage disequilibrium with the CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism, which is also associated with increased catalytic activity. We identified some studies related to the association of CYP1A1 with HNC risk published before July 2007, regarding the relation of the CYP1A1 Ile-Val substitution at codon 462 to HNC. In 4 studies 27-30, the risk for HNC in subjects with the Ile/Val and/or Val/Val genotypes was significantly higher than that for subjects with the Ile/ Ile genotype, suggesting that the Val allele may be associated with increased risk for HNC. A meta-analysis of studies that examined the association of the CYP1A1 Ile-Val substitution with risk for HNC revealed that the Ile/Val and Val/Val genotypes tend to increase HNC risk with an odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] compared with Ile/Ile of 1.32 (0.95-1.82). Successive studies suggest that significant differences in the distribution of certain haplotypes of CYPs have been reported, and the prevalence of certain genotype combinations of CYPs and GSTS has indicated the importance of gene-gene interactions in HNSCC risk 31 32. The pooled data indicated that CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism might be a risk factor for laryngeal cancer, particularly in Caucasians. For Asians, it might slightly increase the susceptibility to laryngeal cancer. However, the data failed to demonstrate a marked association between the CYP1A1 exon 7 polymorphism and laryngeal cancer risk 26. The CYP1A1 exon 7 polymorphism was associated with oral and pharyngeal cancer only for ever smokers, when studied independently in the pooled analysis, although the CYP1A1 MspI variant homozygote allele (m2/m2) was significantly associated with this cancer in both the meta-analysis and pooled analysis. When analyzing the complete genotype of GSTM1 deletion and CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism, the risk of oral and pharyngeal cancers seems to be higher for never smokers than for ever smokers. It should be highlighted that the results of the pooled analysis varied according to the type of controls considered, indicating that a selection bias might be present in some studies, and therefore the results should be considered with caution. There is no indication for population testing of these genes as risk factors for oral and pharyngeal cancer 33. Overall, Zhou et al. 2009 reported that variant genotypes of CYP1A1 might not be risk factors for oral cancer.

  • The glutathione S-transferases are a family of phase II xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes catalyzing the conjugation reactions of reactive intermediates of electrophilic compounds with cytosolic glutathione. Based on sequence similarities, human cytosolic glutathione S-transferases are mainly coded for at 5 loci: GSTA (a), GSTT1 (h), GSTM1 (l), GSTP1 (p), and GSTM3 (c). Polymorphisms in these genes, possibly by altering their expression and functional activities, may affect carcinogen activation/detoxification and DNA repair. Three alleles have been identified at the glutathione Stransferase M1 (GSTM1) locus: GSTM1*0, GSTM1*A, and GSTM1*B. Two major alleles have been identified at the glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) locus: GSTT1*1 and GSTT1*0. Previous studies showed that a homozygous deletion (0/0), or null genotype, at either the GSTM1 locus or the GSTT1 locus resulted in enzyme function loss 32-34, and thus it was hypothesized to be related to the susceptibility to HNC.

  • For HNCs since July 2007, 36 ORs from 58 studies of the null GSTM1 genotype vs the positive genotype were > 1, suggesting that the null GSTM1 genotype may be associated with increased risk for HNC. Sixteen 17 35-49 of the studies showed a significantly higher risk for HNC in subjects with the null GSTM1 genotype than in subjects with the positive genotype. Two meta-analyses 50 51 of studies that examined the association of GSTM1 with risk for HNC revealed that the null genotype significantly increases the risk with ORs (95%CI) of 1.23 (1.06-1.42) and 1.50 (1.21-1.87) compared with the positive genotype 2. Successive studies suggest that GSTM1 has been reported to detoxify the bioreactive diol-exoxides of PAHs, which is important in environmental and occupational carcinogenesis. The data supported that GSTM1 deficiency was associated with laryngeal cancer risk.

  • We identified 23 ORs from 42 studies published before July 2007 of the null GSTT1 genotype vs the positive genotype that were > 1, and 7 studies 39 44 48 52-55 showing a significantly higher risk for HNC in subjects with the null genotype than with the positive genotype, suggesting that the null GSTT1 genotype may be associated with increased risk for HNC. A meta-analysis 50 of studies that examined the association of GSTT1 with risk of HNC revealed that the null genotype tends to increase HNC risk with ORs (95%CI) of 1.17 (0.98- 1.40) compared with positive genotype 2.

  • For GSTP1, four 56-59 of the 21 studies 14 47 56-74 showed a significantly higher risk for HNC in individuals with the Ile/Val and/or Val/Val genotypes than in those with the Ile/Ile genotype. No studies showed a significantly lower risk with the Ile/Val and/or Val/Val genotypes than the Ile/Ile genotype. The 105 Val allele might be associated with an increased risk for HNC. One metaanalysis revealed that the Ile/Val and Val/Val genotypes tend to increase HNC risk with ORs (95%CI) of 1.10 (0.92-1.31) compared with the positive genotype 3 50. There have been no studies after July 2007 investigating the correlation between HNC and GSTP1.

  • Human arylamine N-acetyltransferases play a key role in the metabolism of drugs and environmental chemicals and in the metabolic activation and detoxification of procarcinogens. Phenotyping analyses have revealed an association between NAT enzyme activities and the risk of developing several forms of cancer 32 75. The NAT2 isoenzyme functions to both activate and deactivate arylamine and hydrazine drugs and carcinogens. Polymorphisms in this gene are responsible for the Nacetylation polymorphism in which human populations segregate into rapid, intermediate and slow acetylator phenotypes. Polymorphisms in NAT2 are also associated with higher incidences of cancer and drug toxicity. A second arylamine N-acetyltransferase gene (NAT1) is located near NAT2 (RefSeq, Jul 2008). For HNC, all 7 ORs 14 23 64 76 for the slow NAT2 genotype vs the rapid genotype were > 1, suggesting that the slow NAT2 genotype may be associated with an increased risk for HNC 2. Ying XJ 80, in his meta-analysis published in 2011, claimed that there was overall lack of association between NAT2 polymorphism and laryngeal cancer risk; however, NAT2 slow acetylation may contribute to a risk factor for laryngeal cancer in Asians, but not in Caucasians. In 2008, Buch 81 published results that demonstrated how fast NAT2 acetylation was a risk factor for oral cancer. Demokan in 2010 82 published that NAT1 and NAT2 gene combinations may influence the risk of developing head and neck cancer.

  • Human microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1) plays an important role during xenobiotic detoxification of exogenous chemicals such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are produced during the use of coal tar, coke, bitumen or during cigarette smoking 32 83. Two amino acid-altering polymorphisms, Tyr113His and His139Arg, have been identified in EPHX1 and both are associated with alterations in mEH activity. The EPHX1 His113 variant shows a 40% decrease in EH activity, whereas the EPHX1 Arg139 variant shows 25% increased enzyme activity 2. A comprehensive systematic review of available studies published up to 2011, consisting of 91 studies, 84 (31,144 cases and 42,439 controls) for Tyr113His and 77 (28,496 cases and 38,506 controls) for His139Arg 83. Results of analysis of these two polymorphisms in different cancer types revealed that the low activity allele (H) of Y113H was highly associated with decreased risk of lung cancer (OR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.80-0.96; p = 0.005) and HNC (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.77-0.97; p = 0.014); the high activity allele (R) of H139R was significantly associated with increased risk of lung cancer (OR = 1.18, 95%CI = 1.04-1.33; p = 0.010), but not of HNC (OR = 1.05, 95%CI = 0.93-1.17, p = 0.447). However, the homozygous variant (RR) of H139R showed increased risk of HNC (OR = 1.34, 95%CI = 0.98-1.82, p = 0.065).

  • Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) is a key gene in alcohol metabolism, and determines blood acetaldehyde concentrations after drinking 10. A single point alteration in ALDH2 results in the ALDH2*2 allele. The protein encoded by ALDH2*2 has a Glu to Lys substitution at residue 487, resulting in an inactive subunit and the inability to metabolize acetaldehyde. The ALDH2*2 allele is rare in Western populations, but prevalent in East Asian populations. ALDH2*2/*2 homozygotes have serum acetaldehyde levels that are 13 times higher and heterozygotes have levels 4 times higher than those in *1*1 homozygotes. Six studies 13 40 84-87 reported a relation between ALDH2 polymorphisms and risk for HNC, and all were conducted in Japanese populations. Four studies 35 79 80 82 showed a significantly increased risk for HNC in *1/*2 heterozygotes compared with *1/*1 homozygotes 2. Mc Kay et al. found that five genetic variants at three loci, 4q21, 4q23 and 12q24, were significantly associated with HNC risk 10.

  • ADH isoenzymes, which are primarily involved in ethanol oxidation, consist of subunits encoded by ADH2 and ADH3. In contrast to ADH2, ADH3 is highly polymorphic in Caucasians. Of the 2 allelic variants, the ADH3*1 allele is associated with higher enzyme activity than the ADH3*2 allele and occurs in Caucasians at frequencies of 55-63%. In 5 19 37 88-90 of 8 studies 19 37 88-93, ADH3*2/*1 heterozygotes showed decreased risk for HNC compared with *2/*2 homozygotes. However, in 6 19 37 88 91-93 of 9 studies 19 37 88-93, ADH3*1/*1 homozygotes showed increased risk for HNC 2. In accordance with Mc Kay and co-workers, three independent variants, ADH1B (rs1229984), ADH7 (rs1573496) and ADH1C (rs698), have also been associated with HNC risk in European populations. The effects of these three variants were generally present for each HNC subsites, but more pronounced in oesophageal cancers and males. Strong heterogeneity was found with rs1229984 when stratifying by alcohol consumption.

  • Polymorphisms in X-ray repair cross complementing protein 1 (XRCC1), including Arg194Trp, Arg280His and Arg399Gln, have been described. Although the biochemical and biologic characteristics of the variants have not been determined, it has been reported that individuals with the XRCC1 399Gln variant show increased sister chromatid exchange after treatment with a tobacco-specific carcinogen 2. However, as already described by Gonzalez et al. 94 in 2002, the functional roles for these polymorphisms are unknown, even if they are associated with high risk in non-smokers and in non-alcohol drinkers. The results for the relationship between XRCC1 polymorphisms and HNC are inconsistent as highlighted in two meta-analyses published in 2005.

  • Xeroderma pigmentosum complementary group D (XPD) has 2 functions: nucleotide excision repair and basal transcription as part of the transcription factor complex, TFIIH 95. Polymorphisms, such as 22,541AC and 35,931CA, have been identified. Individuals homozygous for the variant genotype of XPD have suboptimal DNA repair capacity 96. Hiyama et al. in 2008 analyzed 4 studies 97-100 of the genotype at nucleotide 22,541 and 5 studies 98-102 of the genotype at nucleotide 35,931 of XPD. According to these investigations, individuals homozygous for the variant genotype of XPD have suboptimal DNA repair capacity 96.

  • The CCND1 gene encodes a key cell cycle regulatory protein, cyclin D1, which regulates transition from G1 to the S phase during cell division. High activity of cyclin D1 leads to premature cell passage through the G1-S transition, resulting in propagation of unrepaired DN A damage and accumulation of genetic errors, therefore leading to selective advantage for abnormal cell proliferation 103. Numerous studies found that CD1 G/A870 single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with two different splice variant transcripts: CD1a and CD1b. CD1a encodes for the full-length native form of the CD1 protein, and CD1b encodes for a truncated alternate CD1 protein 104. This strongly suggests that individuals with numerous copies of the CCND1-870A are more likely to bypass the G1-S checkpoint, thus contributing to cancer development 103. Hiyama et al. evaluated six ORs 105-110 from 9 studies 105-113 of the GA genotype vs. the GG genotype which at nucleotide position 870 were < 1, and 7 ORs 105-110 for the AA genotype vs GG which were < 1 2. These results are statistically relevant and suggest that the A allele may be associated with decreased risk for HNC. On the basis of the studies published in 2011, cell cycle regulation may play a role in oral carcinogenesis and the CCND1 rs9344 polymorphism may be a useful biomarker for oral oncology 114. The data reported in the literature indicates that CD1 genotype and protein expression as important risk markers for laryngeal cancer and suggest future trials targeting upstream regulators of CD1 transcription 104.

  • Dysfunction in the P53 tumour suppressor gene (located at 17p13) is implicated in many cancers, including HNC, and has received the most attention. The production of p53 is increased in response to cellular insults or DNA damage, and p53 then induces cell cycle arrest at the G1/S junction. If the damage is irreparable, p53 can initiate cell death by apoptosis. The steady-state concentration of p53 in normal cells is low, and the half-life of normal (wild type) p53 is short. In contrast, if the p53 gene is mutated, the genetic product is often present at high concentrations. Even if the concentration is important, mutations in the TP53 gene frequently occur. Mutations in p53 are present in 50-60% of head and neck cancers 115-116. Hiyama published in 2008 that a G-to-C polymorphism in codon 72 of exon 4 results in an Arg-to-Pro substitution. Although both variants are morphologically wild-type, the Pro/Pro genotype is less effective in suppressing cellular transformation 117. Individuals with the Pro/Pro genotype showed a higher risk for HNC than individuals with the Arg/Arg genotype in 15 118-132 of 19 studies 64 118-135. In 2010, Zhou provided a more precise estimation of the relationship between P53 and head and neck cancers. There was no evidence to suggest that TP53 codon 72 polymorphisms may be a risk factor for oral carcinoma 136. However, TP53 codon 72 polymorphisms may be a risk factor for NPC. The homozygote Pro/Pro genotype could significantly increase susceptibility to NPC, whereas the Arg allele markedly decreases NPC risk 137. Bradford 138 and Poeta 139 published that mutations in tumour protein 53 (TP53) may be correlated with aggressive HNSCC disease and relative radioresistance. In the December 2007 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, a team of NIDCR grantees and colleagues evaluated the prognostic value of TP53 mutations in 420 headand- neck cancer patients treated with surgery only and whose survival was tracked for several years thereafter. Detecting TP53 alterations in the tumours of 53% of participants, it was found that these mutations were associated with decreased overall survival.

  • P73 encodes a member of the p53 family of transcription factors involved in cellular responses to stress and development. It maps to a region on chromosome 1p36 that is frequently deleted in neuroblastoma and other tumours, and thought to contain multiple tumour suppressor genes. The demonstration that this gene is monoallelically expressed (likely from the maternal allele) supports the notion that it is a candidate gene for neuroblastoma. Many transcript variants resulting from alternative splicing and/or use of alternate promoters have been found for this gene, but the biological validity and the full-length nature of some variants have not been determined (RefSeq, Feb 2011). Hypermethylation of TP73 is reported in nasopharyngeal carcinomas with a frequency of 20% 140. Ferru in 2006 141, by comparison to normal thyroid tissue surrounding tumours, observed significant down regulation of TP73 transcripts in adenomas and in differentiated carcinomas. Chen published in 2004 142 that p73 expression may be associated with the differentiation of oral stratified squamous epithelium, an early event in human oral carcinogenesis, and associated with the nodal status of patients with oral carcinoma and a possible indicator for malignant change of oral epithelial dysplasia.

Discussion and conclusions

Molecular epidemiologic studies have provided evidence that individual susceptibility to cancer is mediated by both genetic and environmental factors 4 6-14 33 34 43 50 128 135 140 143. Interest in the role of genetic polymorphisms in HNC has increased recently, possibly due to advances in DNA analysis technologies or our knowledge of the human genome.

The most intensively-studied genes are those encoding enzymes that metabolize carcinogens and include GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1. This is likely because these variants are well characterized, and increased cancer risk associated with these variations is plausible. A considerable amount of work has been done on these genes in relation to risk for HNC. One of the major problems of these studies is that many have a small sample size (< 100 cases or < 100 controls) 2. Overall, by summarizing the results of the published meta-analyses of the association between genetic polymorphisms and HNC risk, a statistically risk was reported for 3 polymorphisms, namely:

  • Glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1), 2 meta-analyses;

  • Glutathione S-transferase (GSTT1), 1 meta-analysis;

  • Human microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1), 2 meta-analyses.

As demonstrated by 2 meta-analyses, GSTM1 deficiency was associated with laryngeal cancer risk. Strikingly, the results showed lack of associations between GSTM1 null genotypes and laryngeal cancer risk in Caucasians or Asians. The combination of the GSTM1 null plus the CYP1A1 (m1m2) variant genotypes increased the risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer 26. Previous meta-analysis and pooled analysis have reported an association between the GSTM1 null genotype and head and neck tumours, but did not analyze ethnic specific or subsite specific differences. Varela-Lema et al. 33 evaluated ethnic specific and subsite specific differences in a pooled analysis, and confirmed that there was no association of the GSTM1 null genotype with oral and pharyngeal cancers in Caucasians. Although not statistically significant, African American and African populations seemed to be almost twice as likely to have the GSTM1 null genotype. This lack of statistical significance might also be attributed to the small number of African American and African subjects included in this pooled analysis. There was also an association between GSTM1 null genotypes and smoking status 34.

Deletion of GSTM1 might contribute to the tumorigenesis and progression of nasopharyngeal cancer 26. GSTT1 deletion might also have an association with increased nasopharyngeal cancer risk, as demonstrated by a metaanalysis. A successive study has demonstrated that the data failed to show a significant association of GSTT1 null genotype with increased susceptibility to nasopharyngeal cancer. This discrepancy might be due to several reasons. For GSTT1, a gene that is highly conserved during evolution, major ethnic differences exist in frequency distribution. In East Asia, highest percentages of individuals with the GSTT1 null genotype have been reported. Interestingly, the incidence of nasopharyngeal cancer is high in East Asia, but is low in other regions worldwide. It thus appears that GSTT1 deletion may have an association with increased nasopharyngeal cancer risk. Nevertheless, it indicates that although many people in East Asia carry GSTT1 null genotype, but only a relatively small number of people develop nasopharyngeal cancer, implying that GSTT1 deletion might not be a key event increasing susceptibility to nasopharyngeal cancer 34. Additionally, as only 4 small studies have been published on GSTT1, it is likely that the discrepancy may be due to chance because studies with small sample size may have insufficient statistical power to detect a slight effect or may yield a fluctuated risk estimate 26. Zhang et al. did not find a significant association between the null genotype of GSTT1 and oral cancer risk in Asians or Caucasians 34. Heterogeneity exists between studies, and a significant multiplicative interaction between the null genotype of GSTT1 and smoking status has not been found, although small sample sizes may be a reason for the lack of statistical significance.

Two meta-analyses for the EPHX1 gene demonstrated dissimilar results. The Y113H allele may have a potential protective effect on tobacco-related carcinogenesis of lung and HNC, whereas the homozygous variant of H139R allele, instead, may have a harmful effect 83. Moreover, cigarette-smoking status may influence the association of EPHX1 enzyme activity and the related cancer risk 83.

Many primary studies had focalized their attention on alcohol metabolic genes. In particular, Mc Kay et al. found that five genetic variants at three loci, 4q21, 4q23 and 12q24, were significantly associated with HNC risk. The 12q24 variant is positioned in an extended region of LD that contains multiple genes. Candidate genes include the aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) 10.

In accordance with Mc Kay and co-workers, three independent variants of the ADH gene have been associated with HNC risk in European populations. The effects of these three variants were generally present for each HNC subsites, but more pronounced in esophageal cancers and males. Strong heterogeneity was found with rs1229984 when stratifying by alcohol consumption. Notably, an association was observed in "ever drinkers-never smokers", but not in "never drinkers-ever smokers", suggesting that the effect with the rs1229984 variant is mediated through alcohol rather than tobacco smoking. In contrast, the lack of heterogeneity for rs1573496 when stratifying by alcohol use may imply differences in the mechanism of carcinogenesis among these ADH variants 10. Several studies have suggested rs1229984 may influence alcohol consumption behaviour 10 144-147.

The integration of genome-based knowledge into healthcare has the potential to improve primary and secondary prevention 148. Among the greatest promises of genomic medicine is that the unravelling of the genetic origins of common diseases will eventually lead to individualized medicine, in which prevention and treatment strategies are personalized on the basis of the results of predictive genetic tests. Findings from meta-analyses of genetic association studies have the potential to provide a comprehensive view of the impact of genetic risk factors in disease aetiology, especially when exploring gene-environment interactions 11.

References

  • 1.Szymańska K, Levi JE, Menezes A, et al. TP53 and EGFR mutations in combination with lifestyle risk factors in tumours of the upper aerodigestive tract from South America. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:1054–1059. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hiyama T, Yoshihara M, Tanaka S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and head and neck cancer risk (Review) Int J Oncol. 2008;32:945–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hashibe M, Brennan P, Benhamou S, et al. Alcohol drinking in never users of tobacco, cigarette smoking in never drinkers, and the risk of head and neck cancer: pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;16:777–789. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk179. 99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marron M, Boffetta P, Zhang ZF, et al. Cessation of alcohol drinking, tobacco smoking and the reversal of head and neck cancer risk. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:182–196. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chuang SC, Jenab M, Heck JE, et al. Diet and the risk of head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis in the INHANCE consortium. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23:69–88. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9857-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stott-Miller M, Chen C, Chuang SC, et al. History of diabetes and risk of head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis from the international head and neck cancer epidemiology consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:294–304. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nicolotti N, Chuang SC, Cadoni G, et al. Recreational physical activity and risk of head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis within the international head and neck cancer epidemiology (INHANCE) Consortium. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011;26:619–628. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9612-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Feo E, Rowell J, Cadoni G, et al. A case-control study on the effect of apoliprotein E genotype on head and neck cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:2839–2846. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Negri E, Boffetta P, Berthiller J, et al. Family history of cancer: pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:394–401. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McKay JD, Truong T, Gaborieau V, et al. A genome-wide association study of upper aerodigestive tract cancers conducted within the INHANCE consortium. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1001333–e1001333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gianfagna F, Feo E, Duijn CM, et al. A systematic review of meta-analyses on gene polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk. Curr Genomics. 2008;9:361–374. doi: 10.2174/138920208785699544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Matthias C, Bockmuhl U, Jahnke V, et al. Polymorphism in cytochrome P450 CYP2D6, CYP1A1, CYP2E1 and glutathione S-transferase, GSTM1, GSTM3, GSTT1 and susceptibility to tobacco-related cancers: studies in upper aerodigestive tract cancers. Pharmacogenetics. 1998;8:91–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Katoh T, Kaneko S, Kohshi K, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of tobacco- and alcohol-related metabolizing enzymes and oral cavity cancer. Int J Cancer. 1999;83:606–609. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991126)83:5<606::aid-ijc6>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morita S, Yano M, Tsujinaka T, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes and susceptibility to head-andneck squamous-cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1999;80:685–688. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990301)80:5<685::aid-ijc9>3.0.co;2-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marques CFS, Koifman S, Koifman RJ, et al. Influence of CYP1A1, CYP2E1, GSTM3, and NAT2 genetic polymorphisms in oral cancer susceptibity: results from a case-control study in Rio de Janeiro. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:632–637. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sugimura T, Kumimoto H, Tohnai I, et al. Gene-environment interaction involved in oral carcinogenesis: molecular epidemiological study for metabolic and DNA repair gene polymorphisms. J Oral Pathol Med. 2006;35:11–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2005.00364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gattas GJF, Carvalho MB, Siraque MS, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1, CYP2E1, GSTM1, and GSTT1 associated with head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2006;28:819–826. doi: 10.1002/hed.20410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hung HC, Chuang J, Chien YC, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2E1, GSTM1, and GSTT1; environmental factors and risk of oral cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:901–905. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bouchardy C, Hirvonen A, Coutelle C, et al. Role of alcohol dehydrogenase 3 and cytochrome P-4502E1 genotypes in susceptibility to cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract. Int J Cancer. 2000;87:734–740. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Neuhaus T, Ko YD, Lorenzen K, et al. Association of cytochrome P450 2E1 polymorphisms and head and neck squamous cell cancer. Toxicol Lett. 2004;151:273–282. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hildesheim A, Chen CJ, Caporaso NE, et al. Cytochrome P4502E1 genetic polymorphisms and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: results from a case-control study conducted in Taiwan. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995;4:607–610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hildesheim A, Anderson LM, Chen CJ, et al. CYP2E1 genetic polymorphisms and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1207–1212. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.16.1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gonzalez MV, Alvarez V, Pello MF, et al. Genetic polymorphism of N-acetyltransferase-2, glutathione S-transferase-M1, and cytochromes P450IIE1 and P450IID6 in the susceptibility to head and neck cancer. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51:294–298. doi: 10.1136/jcp.51.4.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kongruttanachok N, Sukdikul S, Setavarin S, et al. Cytochrome P450 2E1 polymorphism and nasopharyngeal carcinoma development in Thailand: a correlative study. BMC Cancer. 2001;1:4–4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-1-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gajecka M, Rydzanicz M, Jaskula-Sztul R, et al. CYP1A1, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, NAT2, GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms or their combinations are associated with the increased risk of the laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Mutat Res. 2005;574:112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhuo WL, Wang Y, Zhuo XL, et al. Polymorphisms of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 and laryngeal cancer risk: evidence-based meta- analyses. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009;135:1081–1090. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0548-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Park JY, Muscat JE, Ren Q, et al. CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms and oral cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:791–797. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sato M, Sato T, Izumo T, et al. Genetically high susceptibity to oral squamous cell carcinoma in terms of combined genotyping of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genes. Oral Oncol. 2000;36:267–271. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(99)00090-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sreelekha TT, Ramadas K, Pandey M, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes in Indian oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2001;37:593–598. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(01)00028-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Varzim G, Monteiro E, Silva RA, et al. CYP1A1 and XRCC1 gene polymorphisms in SCC of the larynx. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003;12:495–499. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200312000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ruwali M, Parmar D. Association of functionally important polymorphisms in cytochrome P450s with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. Indian J Exp Biol. 2010;48:651–665. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Boccia S, Cadoni G, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, et al. CYP1A1, CYP2E1, GSTM1, GSTT1, EPHX1 exons 3 and 4, and NAT2 polymorphisms, smoking, consumption of alcohol and fruit and vegetables and risk of head and neck cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008;134:93–100. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0254-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Varela-Lema L, Taioli E, Ruano-Ravina A, et al. Meta-analysis and pooled analysis of GSTM1 and CYP1A1 polymorphisms and oral and pharyngeal cancers: a HuGE-GSEC review. Genet Med. 2008;10:369–384. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181770196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang ZJ, Hao K, Shi R, et al. Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null polymorphisms, smoking, and their interaction in oral cancer: a HuGE review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:847–857. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sato M, Sato T, Izumo T, et al. Genetic polymorphism of drug-metabolizing enzymes and susceptibility to oral cancer. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20:1927–1931. doi: 10.1093/carcin/20.10.1927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Trizna Z, Clayman GL, Spitz MR, et al. Glutathione S-transferase genotypes as risk factors for head and neck cancer. Am J Surg. 1995;170:499–501. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80339-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Coutelle C, Ward PJ, Fleury B, et al. Laryngeal and oropharyngeal cancer, and alcohol dehydrogenase 3 and glutathione Stransferase M1 polymorphisms. Hum Genet. 1997;99:319–325. doi: 10.1007/s004390050365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lafuente A, Maristany M, Arias C, et al. Glutathione and glutathione S-transferase in human squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx and GSTM1 dependent risk. Anticancer Res. 1998;18:107–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cheng L, Sturgis EM, Eicher SA, et al. Glutathione-S-transferase polymorphisms and risk of squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Cancer. 1999;84:220–224. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990621)84:3<220::aid-ijc4>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nomura T, Noma H, Shibahara T, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 and glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphisms in relation to the risk for oral cancer in Japanese drinkers. Oral Oncol. 2000;36:42–46. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(99)00048-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Park JY, Muscat JE, Kaur T, et al. Comparison of GSTM polymorphisms and risk for oral cancer between African-Americans and Caucasians. Pharmacogenetics. 2000;10:123–131. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200003000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hong YJ, Lee JK, Lee GH, et al. Influence of glutathione Stransferase M1 and T1 genotypes on larynx cancer risk among Korean smokers. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000;38:917–919. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2000.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kietthubthew S, Sriplung H, Au WW. Genetic and environmental interactions on oral cancer in Southern Thailand. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2001;37:111–116. doi: 10.1002/em.1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Buch SC, Notani PN, Bhisey RA. Polymorphism at GSTM1, GSTM3 and GSTT1 gene loci and susceptibility to oral cancer in an Indian population. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:803–807. doi: 10.1093/carcin/23.5.803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bardakci F, Canbay E, Degerli N, et al. Relationship of tobacco smoking with GSTM1 gene polymorphism in laryngeal cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2003;7:307–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2003.tb00231.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Drummond SN, Marco L, Noronha JCM, et al. GSTM1 polymorphism and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2004;40:52–55. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(03)00132-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Peters ES, McClean MD, Marsit CJ, et al. Glutathione Stransferase polymorphisms and the synergy of alcohol and tobacco in oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:2196–2202. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Acar H, Ozturk K, Muslumanoglu MH, et al. Relation of glutathione S-transferase genotypes (GSTM1 and GSTT1) to laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma risk. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006;169:89–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2005.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Capoluongo E, Almadori G, Concolino P, et al. GSTT1 and GSTM1 allelic polymorphisms in head and neck cancer patients from Italian Lazio region. Clin Chem Acta. 2007;376:174–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hashibe M, Brennan P, Strange RC, et al. Meta- and pooled analyses of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, and CYP1A1 genotypes and risk of head and neck cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:1509–1517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tripathy CB, Roy N, et al. Meta-analysis of glutathione S-transferase M1 genotype and risk toward head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2006;28:217–224. doi: 10.1002/hed.20295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jahnke V, Matthias C, Fryer A, et al. Glutathione S-transferase and cytochrome-P450 polymorphism as risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. Am J Surg. 1996;172:671–673. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(96)00298-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sharma A, Mishra A, Das BC, et al. Genetic polymorphism at GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene loci and susceptibility to oral cancer. Neoplasma. 2006;53:309–315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hamel N, Karimi S, Hebert-Blouin MN, et al. Increased risk of head and neck cancer in association with GSTT1 nullizygosity for individuals with low exposure to tobacco. Int J Cancer. 2000;87:452–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Drummond SN, Gomez RS, Noronha JCM, et al. Association between GSTT-1 gene deletion and the susceptibility to oral squamous cell carcinoma in cigarette-smoking subjects. Oral Oncol. 2005;41:515–519. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sikdar N, Paul RR, Roy B, et al. Glutathione S-transferase M3 (A/A) genotype as a risk factor for oral cancer and leukoplakia among Indian tobacco smokers. Int J Cancer. 2004;109:95–101. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Matthias C, Bockmuhl U, Jahnke V, et al. The glutathione S-transferase GSTP1 polymorphism: effects on susceptibility to oral/pharyngeal and laryngeal carcinomas. Pharmacogenetics. 1998;8:1–6. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199802000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Park JY, Schantz SP, Stern JC, et al. Association between glutathione S-transferase π genetic polymorphisms and oral cancer risk. Pharmacogenetics. 1999;9:497–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Katoh T, Kaneko S, Takasawa S, et al. Human glutathione Stransferase P1 polymorphism and susceptibility to smoking related epithelial cancer; oral, lung, gastric, colorectal and urothelial cancer. Pharmacogenetics. 1999;9:165–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Olshan AF, Weissler MC, Watson MA, et al. GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, CYP1A1, and NAT1 polymorphisms, tobacco use, and the risk of head and neck cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:185–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.McWilliams JE, Evans AJ, Beer TM, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in head and neck cancer risk. Head Neck. 2000;22:609–617. doi: 10.1002/1097-0347(200009)22:6<609::aid-hed10>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Evans AJ, Henner WD, Eilers KM, et al. Polymorphisms of GSTT1 and related genes in head and neck cancer risk. Head Neck. 2004;26:63–70. doi: 10.1002/hed.10342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ko Y, Abel J, Harth V, et al. Association of CYP1B1 codon 432 mutant allele in head and neck squamous cell cancer is reflected by somatic mutations of p53 in tumor tissue. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4398–4404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cheng YJ, Chien YC, Hildesheim A, et al. No association between genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1, GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, NAT2, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:179–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jourenkova-Mironova N, Voho A, Bouchardy C, et al. Glutathione S-transferase GSTM1, GSTM3, GSTP1 and GSTT1 genotypes and the risk of smoking-related oral and pharyngeal cancers. Int J Cancer. 1999;81:44–48. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990331)81:1<44::aid-ijc9>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cabelguenne A, Loriot MA, Stucker I, et al. Glutathione associated enzymes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and response to cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Cancer. 2001;93:725–730. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.To-Figueras J, Gene M, Gomez-Catalan J, et al. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase and glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms in relation to laryngeal carcinoma risk. Cancer Lett. 2001;87:95–101. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(02)00406-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Majumder M, Sikdar N, Paul RR, et al. Increased risk of oral leukoplakia and cancer among mixed tobacco users carrying XRCC1 variant haplotypes and cancer among smokers carrying two risk genotypes: one of each of two loci, GSTM3 and XRCC1 (codon 280) Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:2106–2112. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Oude Ophuis M, Manni JJ, Peters WHM. Glutathione Stransferase T1 null polymorphism and the risk for head and neck cancer. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;126:311–317. doi: 10.1080/00016480500416355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jourenkova-Minorova N, Voho A, Bouchardy C, et al. Glutathione S-transferase GSTM3 and GSTP1 genotypes and larynx cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:185–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kelders WPA, Oude Ophuis MB, Roelofs HMJ, et al. The association between glutathione S-transferase P1 genotype and plasma level in head and neck. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:462–466. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200203000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Amador AG, Righi PD, Radpour S, et al. Polymorphisms of xenobiotic metabolizing genes in oropharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:440–445. doi: 10.1067/moe.2002.122586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Oude Ophuis MB, Roelofs HNJ, Brandt PA, et al. Polymorphisms of the glutathione S-transferase P1 gene and head and neck cancer susceptibility. Head Neck. 2003;25:37–43. doi: 10.1002/hed.10182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cho CG, Lee SK, Nam SY, et al. Association of the GSTP1 and NQO1 polymorphisms and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma risk. J Korean Med Sci. 2006;21:1075–1079. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.6.1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Agúndez JA, et al. Polymorphisms of human N-acetyltransferases and cancer risk. Curr Drug Metab. 2008;9:520–531. doi: 10.2174/138920008784892083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hahn M, Hagedorn G, Kuhlisch E, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes and susceptibility to oral cavity cancer. Oral Oncol. 2002;38:486–490. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(01)00086-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Katoh T, Kaneko S, Boissy R, et al. A pilot study testing the association between N-acetyltransferases 1 and 2 and risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma in Japanese people. Carcinogenesis. 1998;19:1803–1807. doi: 10.1093/carcin/19.10.1803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Varzim G, Monteiro E, Siva R, et al. Polymorphisms of arylamine N-acetyltransferase (NAT1 and NAT2) and larynx cancer susceptibility. ORL. 2002;64:206–212. doi: 10.1159/000058026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chen C, Ricks S, Doody DR, et al. N-acetyltransferase 2 polymorphisms, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption, and oral squamous cell cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:1993–2019. doi: 10.1093/carcin/22.12.1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ying XJ, Dong P, Shen B, et al. Possible association of NAT2 polymorphism with laryngeal cancer risk: an evidence-based meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011;137:1661–1667. doi: 10.1007/s00432-011-1045-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Buch SC, Nazar-Stewart V, Weissfeld JL, et al. Case-control study of oral and oropharyngeal cancer in whites and genetic variation in eight metabolic enzymes. Head Neck. 2008;30:1139–1147. doi: 10.1002/hed.20867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Demokan S, Suoglu Y, Gözeler M, et al. N-acetyltransferase 1 and 2 gene sequence variants and risk of head and neck cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37:3217–3226. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9905-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Li X, Hu Z, Qu X, et al. Putative EPHX1 enzyme activity is related with risk of lung and upper aerodigestive tract cancers: a comprehensive meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14749–e14749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yokoyama A, Muramatsu T, Ohmori T, et al. Alcohol-related cancers and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 in Japanese alcoholics. Carcinogenesis. 1998;19:1383–1387. doi: 10.1093/carcin/19.8.1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yokoyama A, Muramatsu T, Ohmori T, et al. Alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase gene polymorphisms and oropharyngolaryngeal, esophageal and stomach cancers in Japanese alcoholics. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:433–439. doi: 10.1093/carcin/22.3.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Asakage T, Yokoyama A, Haneda T, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases, and drinking, smoking and diet in Japanese men with oral and pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28:865–874. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Tiemersma EW, Wark PA, Ocke MC, et al. Alcohol consumption, alcohol dehydrogenase 3 polymorphism, and colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:419–425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Harty LC, Caporaso NE, Hayes RB, et al. Alcohol dehydrogenase 3 genotype and risk of oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1968–1975. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.22.1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Olshan AF, Weissler MC, Watson MA, et al. Risk of head and neck cancer and the alcohol dehydrogenase 3 genotype. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:57–61. doi: 10.1093/carcin/22.1.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Sturgis EM, Dahlstrom KR, Guan Y, et al. Alcohol dehydrogenase 3 genotype is not associated with risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and pharynx. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:273–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Schwarts SM, Doody DR, Fitzgibbons ED, et al. Oral squamous cell cancer risk in relation to alcohol consumption and alcohol dehydrogenase-3 genotypes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:1137–1144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zavras AI, Wu T, Laskaris G, et al. Interaction between a single nucleotide polymorphism in the alcohol dehydrogenase 3 gene, alcohol consumption and oral cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2002;97:526–530. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Nishimoto IN, Pinheiro NA, Rogatto SR, et al. Alcohol dehydrogenase 3 genotype as a risk factor for upper aerodigestive tract cancers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:78–82. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.1.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.González CA, Sala N, Capellá G. Genetic susceptibility and gastric cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2002;100:249–260. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Drapkin R, Sancar A, Reinberg D. Where transcription meets repair. Cell. 1994;77:9–12. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90228-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Qiao Y, Spitz MR, Shen H, et al. Modulation of repair of ultraviolet damage in the host-cell reactivation assay by polymorphic XPC and XPD/ERCC2 genotypes. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:295–299. doi: 10.1093/carcin/23.2.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kietthubthew S, Sriplung H, Au WW, et al. Polymorphism in DNA repair genes and oral squamous cell carcinoma in Thailand. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2006;209:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Majumder M, Sikdar N, Ghosh S, et al. Polymorphisms at XPD and XRCC1 DNA repair loci and increased risk of oral leukoplakia and cancer among NAT2 slow acetylators. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:2148–2156. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Gajecka M, Rydzanicz M, Jaskula-Sztul R, et al. Reduced DNA repair capacity in laryngeal cancer subjects. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;62:25–37. doi: 10.1159/000082460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Sturgis EM, Zheng R, Li L, et al. XPD/ERCC2 polymorphisms and risk of head and neck cancer: a case-control analysis. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:2219–2223. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.12.2219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ramachandran S, Ramadas K, Hariharan R, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of DNA repair genes XRCC1 and XPD and its molecular mapping in Indian oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:350–362. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Huang WY, Olshan AF, Schwarts SM, et al. Selected genetic polymorphisms in MGMT, XRCC1, XPD, and XRCC3 and risk of head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1747–1753. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Pabalan N, Bapat B, Sung L, et al. Cyclin D1 Pro241Pro (CCND1-G870A) polymorphism is associated with increased cancer risk in human populations: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2773–2781. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Papadimitrakopoulou V, Izzo JG, Liu DD, et al. Cyclin D1 and cancer development in laryngeal premalignancy patients. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2009;2:14–21. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Deng L, Zhao XR, Pan KF, et al. Cyclin D1 polymorphism and susceptibility to NPC using DHPLC. Acta Biochem Biophys Sinica. 2002;34:16–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Wong YK, Lin SC, Chang CS, et al. Cyclin D1 genotype in areca-associated oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2003;32:265–270. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2003.00131.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Nishimoto IN, Pinheiro NA, Rogatto SR, et al. Cyclin D1 gene polymorphism as a risk factor for squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive system in non-alcoholics. Oral Oncol. 2004;40:604–610. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2003.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Monteiro E, Varzim G, Pires AM, et al. Cyclin D1 A870G polymorphism and amplification in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: implications of tumor localization and tobacco exposure. Cancer Detect Prev. 2004;28:237–243. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2004.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Holley SL, Matthias C, Jahnke V, et al. Association of cyclin D1 polymorphism with increased susceptibility to oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2005;41:156–160. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Catarino RJ, Breda E, Coelho V, et al. Association of the A870G cyclin D1 gene polymorphism with genetic susceptibility to nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck. 2006;28:603–608. doi: 10.1002/hed.20377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Zheng Y, Shen H, Sturgis EM, et al. Cyclin D1 polymorphism and risk for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a case-control study. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:1195–1199. doi: 10.1093/carcin/22.8.1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Rydzanicz M, Golusinski P, Mielcarek-Kuchta D, et al. Cyclin- D1 gene (CCND1) polymorphism and the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;;263:43–48. doi: 10.1007/s00405-005-0957-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Sathyan KM, Nalinakumari KR, Abraham T, et al. Influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms in H-Ras and cyclin D1 genes on oral cancer susceptibility. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:607–613. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Tsai MH, Tsai CW, Tsou YA, et al. Significant association of cyclin D1 single nucleotide polymorphisms with oral cancer in taiwan. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:227–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Golusinski P, Lamperska K, Pazdrowski J, et al. Analysis of mutations within the TP53 gene in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Otolaryngol Pol. 2011;65:114–121. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6657(11)70640-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Gallì P, Cadoni G, Volante M, et al. A case-control study on the combined effects of p53 and p73 polymorphisms on head and neck cancer risk in an Italian population. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:137–137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Thomas M, Kalita A, Labrecque S, et al. Two polymorphic variants of wild-type p53 differ biochemically and biologically. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:1092–1100. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.2.1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Lu J, Wang LE, Xiong P, et al. 172G > T variant in the 5' untranslated region of DNA repair gene RAD51 reduces risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and interacts with a P53 codon 72 variant. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28:988–994. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Birgander R, Sjalander A, Zhou Z, et al. p53 polymorphisms and haplotypes in nasopharyngeal cancer. Hum Hered. 1996;46:49–54. doi: 10.1159/000154325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Golovleva I, Birgander R, Sjalander A, et al. Interferon-α and P53 alleles involved in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18:645–649. doi: 10.1093/carcin/18.4.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Hamel N, Black MJ, Ghadirian P, et al. No association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:757–759. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Summersgill KF, Smith EM, Kirchner HL, et al. p53 polymorphism, human papillomavirus infection in the oral cavity, and oral cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90:334–339. doi: 10.1067/moe.2000.107359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Tandle AT, Sanghvi V, Saranath D. Determination of p53 genotypes in oral cancer patients from India. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:739–742. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Shen H, Zheng Y, Sturgis EM, et al. P53 codon 72 polymorphism and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a case-control study. Cancer Lett. 2002;183:123–130. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(02)00117-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Drummond SN, Marco L, Pordeus IDA, et al. TP53 codon 72 polymorphism in oral squamouos cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2002;22:3379–3381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Tiwawech D, Srivantanakul P, Karaluk A, et al. The p53 codon 72 polymorphism in Thai nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2003;198:69–75. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(03)00283-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Kietthubthew S, Sriplung H, Au WW, et al. The p53 codon 72 polymorphism and risk of oral cancer in Southern Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2003;4:209–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Katiyar S, Thelma BK, Murthy NS, et al. Polymorphism of the p53 codon 72 arg/pro and the risk of HPV type 16/18-associated cervical and oral cancer in India. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003;252:117–124. doi: 10.1023/a:1025546610920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Cortezzi SS, Provazzi PJ, Sobrinho JS, et al. Analysis of human papillomavirus prevalence and TP53 polymorphism in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2004;150:44–49. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2003.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Twu CW, Jiang RS, Shu CH, et al. Association of p53 codon 72 polymorphism with risk of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006;105:99–104. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60330-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Sousa H, Santos AM, Catarino R, et al. Linkage of TP53 codon 72 pro/pro genotype as predictive factor for nasopharyngeal carcinoma development. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006;15:362–366. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200608000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Yung WCW, Ng MH, Sham JST, et al. p53 codon 72 polymorphism in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1997;93:181–182. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(96)00219-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Sourvinos G, Rizos E, Spandidos DA, et al. p53 codon 72 polymorphism is linked to the development and not the progression of benign and malignant laryngeal tumours. Oral Oncol. 2001;37:572–578. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(00)00139-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Scheckenback K, Lieven O, Gotte K, et al. p53 codon 72 polymorphic variants, loss of allele-specific transcription, and human papilloma virus 16 and/or 18 E6 messenger RNA expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:1805–1809. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Perrone F, Mariani L, Pastore E, et al. p53 codon 72 polymorphisms in human papillomavirus-negative and papillomavirus- positive squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx. Cancer. 2007;109:2461–2465. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Zhuo XL, Li Q, Zhou Y, et al. Study on TP53 codon 72 polymorphisms with oral carcinoma susceptibility. Arch Med Res. 2009;40:625–634. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2009.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Zhuo XL, Cai L, Xiang ZL, et al. TP53 codon 72 polymorphism contributes to nasopharyngeal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Arch Med Res. 2009;40:299–305. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2009.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Bradford CR, Zhu S, Ogawa H, et al. P53 mutation correlates with cisplatin sensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma lines. Head Neck. 2003;25:654–661. doi: 10.1002/hed.10274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Poeta ML, Manola J, Goldwasser MA, et al. TP53 mutations and survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2552–2561. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Worsham MJ, Chen KM, Meduri V, et al. Epigenetic events of disease progression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132:668–677. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.6.668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Ferru A, Denis S, Guilhot J, et al. Expression of TAp73 and DeltaNp73 isoform transcripts in thyroid tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:228–230. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Chen YK, Hsue SS, Lin LM. p73 expression for human buccal epithelial dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma: does it correlate with nodal status of carcinoma and is there a relationship with malignant change of epithelial dysplasia? Head Neck. 2004;26:945–952. doi: 10.1002/hed.20098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Boccia S, Cadoni G, La Torre G, et al. A case-control study investigating the role of sulfotransferase 1A1 polymorphism in head and neck cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006;132:466–472. doi: 10.1007/s00432-006-0093-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Macgregor S, Lind PA, Bucholz KK, et al. Associations of ADH and ALDH2 gene variation with self report alcohol reactions consumption and dependence: an integrated analysis. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:580–593. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Tolstrup JS, Nordestgaard BG, Rasmussen S, et al. Alcoholism and alcohol drinking habits predicted from alcohol dehydrogenase genes. Pharmacogenomics J. 2008;8:220–227. doi: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Zuccolo L, Fitz-Simon N, Gray R, et al. A non-synonymous variant in ADH1B is strongly associated with prenatal alcohol use in a European sample of pregnant women. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;15:4457–4466. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Luo X, Kranzler HR, Zuo L, et al. Diplotype trend regression analysis of the ADH gene cluster and the ALDH2 gene: multiple significant associations with alcohol dependence. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78:973–987. doi: 10.1086/504113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Ricciardi W, Boccia S. Assessment of genomics as a priority for Public Health. Eurohealth. 2007;13:7–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Hu Z, Ma H, Chen F, et al. XRCC1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 38 case-control studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1810–1818. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica are provided here courtesy of Pacini Editore

RESOURCES