Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1990 Nov 11;18(21):6331–6338. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.21.6331

On the movement and alignment of DNA during 120 degrees pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

R W Whitcomb 1, G Holzwarth 1
PMCID: PMC332500  PMID: 2243779

Abstract

The displacement per pulse of lambda, T4, and G DNA during pulsed-field agarose gel electrophoresis has been measured for a fine mesh of pulse durations T between 0.02 and 120 s. The slopes of these curves show that the DNA moves by two distinct processes, designated 1 and 2, depending upon the pulse duration T. Process 1 operates at short T and causes dx/dT to decrease gradually with increasing T. This process is independent of molecular weight M. Process 2 is effective at longer T and causes dx/dT to rise sharply in sigmoidal fashion at a value of T which increases as M1.2, finally reaching a plateau of 1.4 microns/s for E = 4 V/cm. The shape of the dx/dT curve and its dependence on M lead directly to 4 zones of separation in plots of mobility vs M for different T. The alignment of the 3 DNAs during PFGE was measured by fluorescence-detected linear dichroism for E between 4 and 10 V/cm. These results are used in developing a molecular understanding of the mobility data.

Full text

PDF
6331

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akerman B., Jonsson M., Nordén B., Lalande M. Orientational dynamics of T2 DNA during agarose gel electrophoresis: influence of gel concentration and electric field strength. Biopolymers. 1989 Sep;28(9):1541–1571. doi: 10.1002/bip.360280906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birren B. W., Lai E., Clark S. M., Hood L., Simon M. I. Optimized conditions for pulsed field gel electrophoretic separations of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Aug 11;16(15):7563–7582. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.15.7563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borejdo J. Orientation of DNA in agarose gels. Biophys J. 1989 Jun;55(6):1183–1190. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82914-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cantor C. R., Smith C. L., Mathew M. K. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of very large DNA molecules. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:287–304. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.001443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carle G. F., Frank M., Olson M. V. Electrophoretic separations of large DNA molecules by periodic inversion of the electric field. Science. 1986 Apr 4;232(4746):65–68. doi: 10.1126/science.3952500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chu G., Vollrath D., Davis R. W. Separation of large DNA molecules by contour-clamped homogeneous electric fields. Science. 1986 Dec 19;234(4783):1582–1585. doi: 10.1126/science.3538420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crater G. D., Gregg M. R., Holzwarth G. Mobility surfaces for field-inversion gel electrophoresis of linear DNA. Electrophoresis. 1989 May-Jun;10(5-6):310–315. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150100507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Deutsch J. M. Theoretical studies of DNA during gel electrophoresis. Science. 1988 May 13;240(4854):922–924. doi: 10.1126/science.3363374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fangman W. L. Separation of very large DNA molecules by gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 Mar;5(3):653–665. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.3.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gurrieri S., Rizzarelli E., Beach D., Bustamante C. Imaging of kinked configurations of DNA molecules undergoing orthogonal field alternating gel electrophoresis by fluorescence microscopy. Biochemistry. 1990 Apr 3;29(13):3396–3401. doi: 10.1021/bi00465a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holzwarth G., McKee C. B., Steiger S., Crater G. Transient orientation of linear DNA molecules during pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Dec 10;15(23):10031–10044. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.23.10031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Holzwarth G., Platt K. J., McKee C. B., Whitcomb R. W., Crater G. D. The acceleration of linear DNA during pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Biopolymers. 1989 Jun;28(6):1043–1058. doi: 10.1002/bip.360280603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hurley I. DNA orientation during gel electrophoresis and its relation to electrophoretic mobility. Biopolymers. 1986 Apr;25(4):539–554. doi: 10.1002/bip.360250403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Olvera de la Cruz M, Gersappe D, Shaffer EO. Dynamics of DNA during pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Phys Rev Lett. 1990 May 7;64(19):2324–2327. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Platt KJ, Holzwarth G. Velocity of DNA in gels during field inversion. Phys Rev A Gen Phys. 1989 Dec 15;40(12):7292–7300. doi: 10.1103/physreva.40.7292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Righetti P. G., Brost B. C., Snyder R. S. On the limiting pore size of hydrophilic gels for electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 1981 Jun;4(5-6):347–363. doi: 10.1016/0165-022x(81)90075-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwartz D. C., Koval M. Conformational dynamics of individual DNA molecules during gel electrophoresis. Nature. 1989 Apr 6;338(6215):520–522. doi: 10.1038/338520a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Serwer P., Hayes S. J. Exclusion of spheres by agarose gels during agarose gel electrophoresis: dependence on the sphere's radius and the gel's concentration. Anal Biochem. 1986 Oct;158(1):72–78. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90591-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Slater G. W., Noolandi J. Effect of nonparallel alternating fields on the mobility of DNA in the biased reptation model of gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 1989 May-Jun;10(5-6):413–428. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150100520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith S. B., Aldridge P. K., Callis J. B. Observation of individual DNA molecules undergoing gel electrophoresis. Science. 1989 Jan 13;243(4888):203–206. doi: 10.1126/science.2911733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Southern E. M., Anand R., Brown W. R., Fletcher D. S. A model for the separation of large DNA molecules by crossed field gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Aug 11;15(15):5925–5943. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.15.5925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stellwagen N. C. Effect of the electric field on the apparent mobility of large DNA fragments in agarose gels. Biopolymers. 1985 Dec;24(12):2243–2255. doi: 10.1002/bip.360241207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sturm J, Weill G. Direct observation of DNA chain orientation and relaxation by electric birefringence: Implications for the mechanism of separation during pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Phys Rev Lett. 1989 Mar 27;62(13):1484–1487. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Viovy J. L. Reptation-breathing theory of pulsed electrophoresis: dynamic regimes, antiresonance and symmetry breakdown effects. Electrophoresis. 1989 May-Jun;10(5-6):429–441. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150100521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vollrath D., Davis R. W. Resolution of DNA molecules greater than 5 megabases by contour-clamped homogeneous electric fields. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Oct 12;15(19):7865–7876. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.19.7865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zimm BH. Size flucuations can explain anomalous mobility in field-inversion electrophoresis of DNA. Phys Rev Lett. 1988 Dec 26;61(26):2965–2968. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES