Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1990 Nov 11;18(21):6393–6397. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.21.6393

The enhancers and promoters of the Xenopus laevis ribosomal spacer are associated with histones upon active transcription of the ribosomal genes.

S I Dimitrov 1, Stefanovsky VYu 1, L Karagyozov 1, D Angelov 1, I G Pashev 1
PMCID: PMC332518  PMID: 2243781

Abstract

The presence of histones on the enhancer-promoter region of the X.laevis ribosomal spacer has been studied in embryos at stage 40, where the ribosomal genes are actively transcribed. Isolated tadpole nuclei were either fixed with formaldehyde or irradiated with UV laser to crosslink histones to DNA. The purified protein-DNA complexes were immunoprecipitated with antibodies to the histones H1, H2A and H4 and the DNA fragments carrying the respective histones were analyzed for the presence of spacer enhancer-promoter sequences by hybridization to specific DNA probe. The two independent crosslinking procedures revealed the presence of these DNA sequences in the precipitated DNA. The quantitative analysis of the UV laser-crosslinked complexes showed that histones H2A and H4 were associated with enhancer-promoter DNA in amounts similar to those found for bulk DNA, whilst the content of H1 was reduced.

Full text

PDF
6393

Images in this article

6394Image
on p.6394
6395Image
on p.6395

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Angelov D., Stefanovsky VYu, Dimitrov S. I., Russanova V. R., Keskinova E., Pashev I. G. Protein-DNA crosslinking in reconstituted nucleohistone, nuclei and whole cells by picosecond UV laser irradiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 May 25;16(10):4525–4538. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.10.4525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Conconi A., Widmer R. M., Koller T., Sogo J. M. Two different chromatin structures coexist in ribosomal RNA genes throughout the cell cycle. Cell. 1989 Jun 2;57(5):753–761. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90790-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Culotta V., Sollner-Webb B. Sites of topoisomerase I action on X. laevis ribosomal chromatin: transcriptionally active rDNA has an approximately 200 bp repeating structure. Cell. 1988 Feb 26;52(4):585–597. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90471-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. De Winter R. F., Moss T. A complex array of sequences enhances ribosomal transcription in Xenopus laevis. J Mol Biol. 1987 Aug 20;196(4):813–827. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90407-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Winter R. F., Moss T. Spacer promoters are essential for efficient enhancement of X. laevis ribosomal transcription. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):313–318. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90765-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Firek S., Read C., Smith D. R., Moss T. The Xenopus laevis ribosomal gene terminator contains sequences that both enhance and repress ribosomal transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Sep;9(9):3777–3784. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.9.3777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilmour D. S., Lis J. T. Detecting protein-DNA interactions in vivo: distribution of RNA polymerase on specific bacterial genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(14):4275–4279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.14.4275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hewish D. R., Burgoyne L. A. Chromatin sub-structure. The digestion of chromatin DNA at regularly spaced sites by a nuclear deoxyribonuclease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973 May 15;52(2):504–510. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(73)90740-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hockensmith J. W., Kubasek W. L., Vorachek W. R., von Hippel P. H. Laser cross-linking of nucleic acids to proteins. Methodology and first applications to the phage T4 DNA replication system. J Biol Chem. 1986 Mar 15;261(8):3512–3518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Karpov V. L., Preobrazhenskaya O. V., Mirzabekov A. D. Chromatin structure of hsp 70 genes, activated by heat shock: selective removal of histones from the coding region and their absence from the 5' region. Cell. 1984 Feb;36(2):423–431. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90235-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. La Volpe A., Taggart M., Macleod D., Bird A. Coupled demethylation of sites in a conserved sequence of Xenopus ribosomal DNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 2):585–592. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. La Volpe A., Taggart M., McStay B., Bird A. DNaseI-hypersensitive sites at promoter-like sequences in the spacer of Xenopus laevis and Xenopus borealis ribosomal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Aug 25;11(16):5361–5380. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.16.5361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Labhart P., Koller T. Structure of the active nucleolar chromatin of Xenopus laevis Oocytes. Cell. 1982 Feb;28(2):279–292. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90346-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Labhart P., Reeder R. H. Enhancer-like properties of the 60/81 bp elements in the ribosomal gene spacer of Xenopus laevis. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):285–289. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90324-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lucchini R., Pauli U., Braun R., Koller T., Sogo J. M. Structure of the extrachromosomal ribosomal RNA chromatin of Physarum polycephalum. J Mol Biol. 1987 Aug 20;196(4):829–843. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90408-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McStay B., Reeder R. H. A termination site for Xenopus RNA polymerase I also acts as an element of an adjacent promoter. Cell. 1986 Dec 26;47(6):913–920. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90806-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Moss T. A transcriptional function for the repetitive ribosomal spacer in Xenopus laevis. Nature. 1983 Mar 17;302(5905):223–228. doi: 10.1038/302223a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moss T., Mitchelson K., de Winter R. The promotion of ribosomal transcription in eukaryotes. Oxf Surv Eukaryot Genes. 1985;2:207–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moss T. Transcription of cloned Xenopus laevis ribosomal DNA microinjected into Xenopus oocytes, and the identification of an RNA polymerase I promoter. Cell. 1982 Oct;30(3):835–842. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90288-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nacheva G. A., Guschin D. Y., Preobrazhenskaya O. V., Karpov V. L., Ebralidse K. K., Mirzabekov A. D. Change in the pattern of histone binding to DNA upon transcriptional activation. Cell. 1989 Jul 14;58(1):27–36. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90399-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Prior C. P., Cantor C. R., Johnson E. M., Littau V. C., Allfrey V. G. Reversible changes in nucleosome structure and histone H3 accessibility in transcriptionally active and inactive states of rDNA chromatin. Cell. 1983 Oct;34(3):1033–1042. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90561-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Reeves R. Nucleosome structure of Xenopus oocyte amplified ribosomal genes. Biochemistry. 1978 Nov 14;17(23):4908–4916. doi: 10.1021/bi00616a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reeves R. Ribosomal genes of Xenopus laevis: evidence of nucleosomes in transcriptionally active chromatin. Science. 1976 Oct 29;194(4264):529–532. doi: 10.1126/science.973136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Reeves R. Structure of Xenopus ribosomal gene chromatin during changes in genomic transcription rates. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1978;42(Pt 2):709–722. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Reeves R. Transcriptionally active chromatin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Sep 10;782(4):343–393. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(84)90044-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Russanova V. R., Dimitrov S. I., Makarov V. L., Pashev I. G. Accessibility of the globular domain of histones H1 and H5 to antibodies upon folding of chromatin. Eur J Biochem. 1987 Sep 1;167(2):321–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13339.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Scheer U., Sommerville J., Bustin M. Injected histone antibodies interfere with transcription of lampbrush chromosome loops in oocytes of Pleurodeles. J Cell Sci. 1979 Dec;40:1–20. doi: 10.1242/jcs.40.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Solomon M. J., Larsen P. L., Varshavsky A. Mapping protein-DNA interactions in vivo with formaldehyde: evidence that histone H4 is retained on a highly transcribed gene. Cell. 1988 Jun 17;53(6):937–947. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)90469-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Spadafora C., Crippa M. Compact structure of ribosomal chromatin in Xenopus laevis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Mar 26;12(6):2691–2704. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.6.2691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stefanovsky VYu, Dimitrov S. I., Angelov D., Pashev I. G. Interactions of acetylated histones with DNA as revealed by UV laser induced histone-DNA crosslinking. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989 Oct 16;164(1):304–310. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(89)91718-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stefanovsky VYu, Dimitrov S. I., Russanova V. R., Angelov D., Pashev I. G. Laser-induced crosslinking of histones to DNA in chromatin and core particles: implications in studying histone-DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Dec 11;17(23):10069–10081. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.23.10069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Thibodeau A., Ruiz-Carrillo A. The globular region of histone H5 is equally accessible to antibodies in relaxed and condensed chromatin. J Biol Chem. 1988 Nov 5;263(31):16236–16241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wolffe A. P. Dominant and specific repression of Xenopus oocyte 5S RNA genes and satellite I DNA by histone H1. EMBO J. 1989 Feb;8(2):527–537. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03407.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES