Abstract
BACKGROUND
Pneumonia is the most common infectious cause of death worldwide. Over the last decade, patient characteristics and health care factors have changed. However, little information is available regarding systematically and simultaneously exploring effects of these changes on pneumonia outcomes.
OBJECTIVES
We used nationwide longitudinal population-based data to examine which patient characteristics and health care factors were associated with changes in 30-day mortality rates for pneumonia patients.
DESIGN
Trend analysis using multilevel techniques.
SETTING
General acute care hospitals throughout Taiwan.
PARTICIPANTS
A total of 788,011 pneumonia admissions.
MEASUREMENTS
Thirty-day mortality rates. Taiwan’s National Health Insurance claims data from 1997 to 2008 were used to identify the effects of patient characteristics and health care factors on 30-day mortality rates.
RESULTS
Male, older, or severely ill patients, patients with more comorbidities, weekend admissions, larger reimbursement cuts and lower physician volume were associated with increased 30-day mortality rates. Moreover, there were interactions between patient age and trend on mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
Male, older or severely ill patients with pneumonia have higher 30-day mortality rates. However, mortality gaps between elderly and young patients narrowed over time; namely, the decline rate of mortality among elderly patients was faster than that among young patients. Pneumonia patients admitted on weekends also have higher mortality rates than those admitted on weekdays. The mortality of pneumonia patients rises under increased financial strain from cuts in reimbursement such as the Balanced Budget Act in the United States or global budgeting. Higher physician volume is associated with lower mortality rates.
KEYWORDS: pneumonia, outcomes, mortality
INTRODUCTION
Pneumonia is the most common infectious cause of death and one of the top ten causes of death worldwide1,2. The pneumonia mortality rate has been regarded as a proxy measure of hospital performance and quality of care to compare hospitals3–5. For example, the 30-day mortality rate after pneumonia has been used by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to compare outcomes among different hospitals. Finding the determinants that affect changes in pneumonia mortality rates is important for developing effective initiatives to improve pneumonia outcomes. Additionally, patient characteristics and health care factors have changed over the past years. As far as we know, there have been few studies using nationwide longitudinal population-based data to systematically and simultaneously explore effects of these changes on pneumonia mortality rates.
If the mortality rate is to be used as a key indicator of hospital performance for pneumonia care delivery, an understanding of the variables associated with pneumonia mortality rates is essential. One previous study has found that certain variables may influence pneumonia mortality rates, including patient characteristics (age, gender, illness severity and comorbid illness) and one health care factor (physician volume)6. However, so far, no research has examined the impact of weekend admissions or reimbursement cuts on pneumonia mortality. Prior studies have shown that weekend admissions for other different conditions or procedures are associated with increased mortality7,8, and larger cuts in reimbursement from the Balanced Budget Act or global budgeting are associated with higher postoperative or stoke mortality9,10.
This study, using nationwide population-based data from Taiwan from 1997 to 2008, applies a multilevel model to systematically and simultaneously examine the associations of patient characteristics and health care factors (weekend admissions, reimbursement cuts and physician volume) with changes in 30-day mortality rates among patients with pneumonia.
METHODS
Database
We used information from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) for this study. The NHIRD, provided by the Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) and managed by the National Health Research Institutes, is a de-identified secondary database that contains patient-level demographic, diagnostic and administrative information across Taiwan. It is released for public access for research purposes.
In Taiwan, the BNHI, which is the sole insurer, has implemented national health insurance (NHI) for almost the entire population since March 1995. Each enrollee pays a premium and then enjoys comprehensive benefits with a low coinsurance policy (10% for inpatient care with a yearly cap of about US$1,500 in 2008). Every enrollee is free to go to any hospital or clinic because there is no gatekeeper system, and almost all providers have contracts with the BNHI. Pneumonia care is reimbursed on a fee-for-service basis.
Study Population
Mainly according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) technical specifications11, all pneumonia discharges (excluding transfers) of patients aged 18 years and older admitted to acute care hospitals in Taiwan from 1997 to 2008 were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9 CM) code combinations as either: a principal diagnosis of pneumonia (codes 480.0 to 487.0) or a principal diagnosis of acute respiratory failure (code 518.81) or septicemia (code 038) with the 480 codes as a secondary diagnosis. Unaccredited hospitals were excluded because they were likely to receive only low-risk or rather few patients. The initial data set comprised 794,621 patients. Data cleanup entailed removing patients with missing data. The final data set consisted of 788,011 patients.
Study Variables
Dependent Variables
The outcome variable was all-cause 30-day mortality from the time of admission12, which the CMS have suggested4,5. The advantage of using 30-day mortality is that the variation in length of stay does not have an undue effect on mortality rates. Without a standardized period, hospitals would have an incentive to adopt strategies that would shift deaths out of the hospital without improving quality of care. Hospital quality would be expected to influence patient outcomes in this timeframe13. The most important reason why the 30-day mortality rate is used by the CMS is because mortality within 30 days is pneumonia-related, while mortality after 30 days is primarily due to comorbid conditions14. The period of 30 days after admission is used in pneumonia outcome studies15–17. Thirty-day mortality was calculated by linking inpatient admission records with withdrawal certificate records10,18,19. Withdrawal dates are the same as death dates according to death certificate records. Taiwan’s National Health Insurance is a compulsory single payer program, so the only reason for patients being withdrawn from NHI coverage within 30 days of hospital admission would be that they had died (the other two conditions for withdrawal, being jailed for over 2 months or disappearing for over 6 months, would not be possible reasons for withdrawal within 30 days of hospital admission).
Independent Variables
Patient characteristics included gender, age (<65, 65–74 and >74 years), illness severity and comorbid illness. Patient illness severity is captured in five variables, having an intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respiratory failure/arrest (ICD-9-CM 518.81, 799.1), or hypotension/shock (ICD-9-CM 458, 785.5), and receiving mechanical ventilation (ICD-9-CM 96.7) or in-hospital dialysis (ICD-9-CM 39.95, 54.98)6,20,21. The Charlson-Deyo index was used to quantify the comorbidities of pneumonia patients6,22. This index is the sum of weighted scores based on the presence or absence of 17 different medical conditions. The higher the scores are, the greater the comorbidity burden.
Health care factors included weekend admissions, cuts in reimbursement and physician volume. The weekend effect was defined by whether patients were admitted on Saturday or Sunday (yes/no)8,19. For physician volume, each patient admission was linked with the number of pneumonia patients treated by that physician in the year of the patient’s admission.
The degree of cuts in reimbursement was measured based on the quarterly monetary value of each point10. Since July 2002, a hospital global budgeting system (fixed budget) has been adopted to control the rapid growth in medical expenditures. The global budget for a certain year is determined at the end of the previous year. Reimbursement to providers is based on an existing fee-for-service schedule, which lists a relative value or number of points for each item of service. The monetary value of each point was fixed [NT $1 (US $0.03)] until the adoption of global budgeting. Since then, the monetary value of each point has been equal to the fixed budget divided by the number of points that all hospitals claim, so it fluctuates. For example, the value of NT $0.8920 per point for the first quarter of 200523 meant that hospitals had an average decrease in reimbursement of NT $0.1080 per point, which corresponded to a 10.8% reduction in revenues. In other words, the monetary value per 100 points represents the percentage of reimbursement (with 100% indicating the full payment). Thus, the reimbursement cuts indicate discounted payment compared to full payment (100%).
The covariates included physician, hospital characteristics and time trend. The physician covariates were: age and specialty (internal medicine, family medicine, others). The hospital covariates were: teaching status (yes/no), geographic location (Taipei, northern, central, southern, Kao-Ping, eastern) and competition. Hospital competition was measured by the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI). The HHI is the sum of squared market shares of each hospital in the market, and the market share is the ratio of bed counts in each hospital divided by the total beds in the market18. We calculated the HHI for the 17 medical area networks (markets) demarcated by Taiwan’s Department of Health. The higher the HHI is, the more concentrated (less competitive) the market. The linear time trend was included to capture all omitted trending variables such as increases in vaccination coverage or advances in medical treatment and to separate them from the impact of hospital global budgeting10,24–26.
Statistical Analysis
Multilevel logistic regression (also known as the hierarchical generalized linear model, HGLM) was applied to inpatient admissions data over the 1997–2008 period to analyze trends in 30-day mortality10,24. Patients (level 1) were considered to be nested within physicians at level 2 and then nested within hospitals at level 3. Multilevel modeling is appropriate for hierarchically structured data comprising patients treated by physicians who practice in hospitals because it provides more accurate results regarding precise estimates than conventional regression modeling, which basically ignores the possible correlation of outcomes within a given physician or hospital27,28. Multilevel modeling also avoids the problem of atomistic fallacy, where inferences about the groups are incorrectly drawn from individual-level information29,30.
Multilevel logistic regression was applied to explore the effects of patient characteristics (gender, age, illness severity and comorbidities) and health care factors (weekend admissions, cuts in reimbursement and physician volume) on 30-day mortality, adjusted for physician characteristics (age and specialty), hospital characteristics (teaching status, geographic location and competition) and time trend. Moreover, to examine questions about differences in the intercept that can be predicted by higher level variables, multilevel models are also used to examine differences in slopes for a dependent variable (i.e., interaction terms)31. Thus, potential interactions selected a priori between patient characteristic/health care factors and time trend, and health care factors and hospital characteristics were explored. The SAS statistical software (version 9.1) and HLM (version 6.02) were used for the analysis. A two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Descriptive Trends
In Table 1, information is presented on patient characteristics, health care factors and patient outcomes over the study period, 1997–2008. The percentage of male patients increased from 59.6% to 63.9%. The percentage of patients age 75 and over rose from 30.7% to 51.4%. The percentage of patients who had at least one ICU stay increased from 12.4% to 16.3%. The percentage of patients with complications of respiratory failure/arrest increased from 8.1% to 13.8%. The mean Charlson-Deyo index rose from 0.81 to 1.23. The proportion of weekend admissions was almost constant (approximately 24.0%). The mean quarterly monetary value of each point under global budgeting decreased steadily from 0.9805 in 2002 to 0.8999 in 2004, and then rebounded to 0.9429 in 2008. In other words, the mean magnitude of payment reduction on hospital revenues was highest (10.01%) in 2004. Mean physician volume increased from 62 cases in 1997 to 121 cases in 2002, but then decreased to 106 cases in 2008. The 30-day mortality rate decreased from 11.2% to 10.2%.
Table 1.
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of patients | 35,241 | 41,991 | 50,496 | 49,744 | 62,991 | 71,565 | 67,225 | 74,601 | 86,389 | 73,015 | 83,645 | 91,108 |
Patient characteristics | ||||||||||||
Gender, male, % | 59.6 | 58.9 | 59.6 | 60.0 | 62.6 | 63.5 | 63.4 | 63.9 | 62.1 | 65.0 | 63.7 | 63.9 |
Patient age, % | ||||||||||||
65–74 | 27.0 | 26.4 | 26.0 | 25.2 | 21.7 | 21.2 | 21.2 | 21.0 | 19.4 | 19.5 | 18.7 | 18.4 |
75+ | 30.7 | 33.1 | 33.7 | 36.0 | 34.3 | 36.0 | 39.2 | 43.4 | 43.6 | 48.7 | 50.4 | 51.4 |
Intensive care unit, % | 12.4 | 12.6 | 13.8 | 14.7 | 14.7 | 15.1 | 16.3 | 16.7 | 16.2 | 18.3 | 17.2 | 16.3 |
Respiratory failure/arrest, % | 8.1 | 9.5 | 11.1 | 12.4 | 12.2 | 12.6 | 14.4 | 13.8 | 13.3 | 14.7 | 13.9 | 13.8 |
Hypotension/ shock, % | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 5.3 |
Mechanical ventilation, % | 3.5 | 3.8 | 5.2 | 6.1 | 6.8 | 8.4 | 11.4 | 13.2 | 12.9 | 14.0 | 13.2 | 12.4 |
Dialysis, % | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.9 |
Mean Charlson score | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 1.05 | 1.11 | 1.08 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.23 |
Weekend admissions, % | 23.9 | 23.4 | 23.5 | 24.3 | 23.3 | 23.4 | 23.7 | 23.7 | 23.5 | 23.5 | 23.9 | 24.3 |
Mean quarterly monetary value of each point | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.9805 | 0.9559 | 0.8999 | 0.9002 | 0.9336 | 0.9478 | 0.9429 |
Cuts in reimbursementa, % | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −1.95 | −4.41 | −10.01 | −9.98 | −6.64 | −5.22 | −5.71 |
Physician characteristics | ||||||||||||
Mean physician volume | 61.8 | 71.6 | 86.4 | 79.7 | 108.4 | 121.1 | 105.2 | 106.9 | 116.3 | 92.7 | 100.5 | 105.8 |
Mean physician age, years | 42.3 | 42.0 | 42.2 | 42.0 | 41.8 | 42.2 | 42.4 | 42.4 | 42.6 | 42.4 | 42.7 | 42.8 |
Specialty, % | ||||||||||||
Internal medicine | 77.1 | 78.7 | 77.6 | 79.4 | 79.3 | 78.3 | 79.2 | 85.3 | 84.9 | 83.5 | 87.3 | 87.6 |
Family medicine | 16.4 | 15.1 | 14.1 | 12.7 | 11.5 | 11.9 | 10.8 | 10.2 | 8.7 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 6.8 |
Hospital characteristics | ||||||||||||
Teaching, % | 62.9 | 65.8 | 66.6 | 70.1 | 73.0 | 74.5 | 75.0 | 72.4 | 75.9 | 77.6 | 76.7 | 74.7 |
Location, % | ||||||||||||
Taipei | 25.9 | 26.1 | 27.9 | 29.0 | 26.7 | 26.7 | 25.8 | 25.0 | 25.1 | 28.2 | 29.0 | 28.7 |
Northern | 15.8 | 16.2 | 15.2 | 17.4 | 17.6 | 16.0 | 16.1 | 15.4 | 13.7 | 13.8 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
Central | 15.1 | 16.8 | 14.2 | 16.7 | 17.3 | 19.0 | 20.6 | 20.5 | 20.4 | 17.4 | 16.4 | 16.8 |
Southern | 15.1 | 14.7 | 15.3 | 14.3 | 14.7 | 14.6 | 15.3 | 16.0 | 16.8 | 17.8 | 17.6 | 17.8 |
Kao-Ping | 24.0 | 22.2 | 23.2 | 18.9 | 20.1 | 20.2 | 18.4 | 19.1 | 19.5 | 18.2 | 19.3 | 18.7 |
Mean HHI | 0.088 | 0.091 | 0.094 | 0.097 | 0.096 | 0.093 | 0.099 | 0.098 | 0.099 | 0.099 | 0.099 | 0.102 |
Patient mortality | ||||||||||||
30-day mortality, % | 11.2 | 11.4 | 10.8 | 11.1 | 10.0 | 9.5 | 10.0 | 9.7 | 9.5 | 10.4 | 10.0 | 10.2 |
HHI indicates Herfindahl-Hirschman Index
aThe reimbursement cuts represent discounted payment compared to full payment (100%). Percentage of reimbursement cuts = [(monetary value of each point-1)/1] × 100% = monetary value of each point × 100%-100%
Furthermore, Figure 1 exhibits the 30-day mortality rate by patient age group, 1997–2008. Older age groups had higher mortality rates than younger groups, and the age gap in mortality decreased over time.
Multilevel Analysis
Table 2 presents the results of the multilevel logistic regression analysis examining the associations of patient characteristics and health care factors with 30-day mortality. After adjusting for physician, hospital characteristics and time trend, there were significant associations of patient gender and age, severity, comorbidities, weekend admissions, cuts in reimbursement and physician volume with 30-day mortality rates. There were also significant interactions between patient age and time trend.
Table 2.
OR | 95% CI | ||
---|---|---|---|
Patient level | |||
Male (ref: female) | 1.11 | 1.09 | 1.13 |
Age (ref: <65 years) | |||
65–74 years | 1.88 | 1.77 | 2.00 |
In trend | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.98 |
>74 years | 3.14 | 2.97 | 3.31 |
In trend | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.98 |
Intensive care unit (ref: no) | 2.56 | 2.50 | 2.63 |
Respiratory failure/arrest (ref: no) | 3.54 | 3.46 | 3.63 |
Hypotension/shock (ref: no) | 6.82 | 6.64 | 7.00 |
Mechanical ventilation (ref: no) | 1.37 | 1.33 | 1.41 |
Dialysis (ref: no) | 1.11 | 1.06 | 1.16 |
Charlson score | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.27 |
Weekend admission (ref: no) | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.05 |
Quarterly monetary value per 100 points | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
Physician level | |||
Physician volume/100 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.79 |
Physician age, years | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Specialty (ref: others) | |||
Internal medicine | 0.97 | 0.94 | 1.00 |
Family medicine | 1.01 | 0.97 | 1.05 |
Hospital level | |||
Teaching (ref: non-teaching) | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
Location (ref: eastern) | |||
Taipei | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.88 |
Northern | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.92 |
Central | 1.06 | 0.96 | 1.18 |
Southern | 1.05 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
Kao-Ping | 0.99 | 0.89 | 1.10 |
HHI | 1.18 | 0.89 | 1.57 |
Trend | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.97 |
Ref indicates reference group; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; HHI, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index
Male patients had 11% higher odds of 30-day death compared with female patients [odds ratio (OR) = 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09 to 1.13]. Patients aged 75 and older had 3.14 times higher odds of death compared with patients aged 64 and younger (OR = 3.14; 95% CI = 2.97 to 3.31), but there was a significant difference in the degree of mortality rate improvements for older patients compared with younger patients (OR = 0.98 with each additional year; 95% CI = 0.97 to 0.98). Patients admitted to the ICU had 2.56 times higher odds of death compared with patients not admitted (OR = 2.56; 95% CI = 2.50 to 2.63). Patients with complications of respiratory failure/arrest had 3.54 times higher odds of death compared with patients without respiratory failure/arrest (OR = 3.54; 95% CI = 3.46 to 3.63). A one-point increase in the Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index score resulted in a 26% increase in the risk of death (OR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.26 to 1.27).
Patients admitted on weekends had 3% higher odds of 30-day death compared with those admitted on weekdays (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.05). Larger reimbursement cuts from hospital global budgeting were associated with higher 30-day mortality rates. An increase in reimbursement of NT$1 per 100 points was associated with 1% lower odds of 30-day mortality (OR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.99–0.99). In other words, for every NT$1 decrease per 100 points, which corresponded to every 1% reduction in average hospital revenues, the odds of 30-day mortality were 1.0% higher. There was a significant inverse association between physician volume and 30-day mortality (OR = 0.78 with a 100-patient increase in annual physician volume, 95% CI = 0.76 to 0.79); namely, patients had 22% lower odds of 30-day mortality per additional 100 patients treated annually by a physician.
DISCUSSION
This study was the first using nationwide longitudinal population-based data to systematically and simultaneously examine the associations of patient characteristics and health-care factors with 30-day mortality. We found that male patients, older patients, severely ill patients, patients with more comorbidities, weekend admissions, larger cuts in reimbursement and lower physician volume were associated with increased 30-day mortality. Additionally, there was an interaction between patient age and trend on mortality.
The findings of the effects of patient gender, age, severity and comorbidities on pneumonia mortality are consistent with the results of Marrie et al.6. Patients with these characteristics were considered to be at higher risk for mortality. Furthermore, we found that mortality gaps between elderly and young patients narrowed over time; namely, the decline in the mortality rate among elderly patients was faster than that among young patients. It is probable that influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates among elderly patients increased over time because of gradual implementation of government-sponsored vaccination programs for the elderly17,32–34. In 1998, a national government-sponsored influenza vaccination program for the elderly (age 65 and older) was introduced in Taiwan. In 1998 and 1999, the free vaccinations were offered to all elderly people who had been hospitalized because of cardiovascular and pulmonary illnesses or diabetes mellitus, and who resided in a health care institution. In 2000, free coverage was extended to elderly people who had been hospitalized because of stroke, pulmonary tuberculosis or pneumosilicosis. Since 2001, free vaccinations have been offered to all elderly people. The pneumococcal vaccine has been offered for individual purchase in Taiwan since 199932. Additionally, several county governments have provided free influenza vaccines to all the county's elderly population and pneumococcal vaccinations to all the county's older elderly (age 75 and older) since 200033,34. Other studies have also shown declining mortality rates among patients with pneumonia over the past 10–20 years17,35.
Our study confirms the weekend-outcome relationship for pneumonia care. The finding of the relationship between weekend admissions and higher mortality is similar to the results of Foss and Kehlet regarding hip fracture36, Kostis et al. concerning acute myocardial infarction8, and Saposnik et al. and Tung et al. regarding stroke19,37. Disparities in medical resources, expertise or staffing levels for nurses as well as for physicians during weekends may exist in Taiwan19. These disparities can lead to higher mortality on weekends.
The finding of the relationship between larger reimbursement cuts and higher pneumonia mortality is consistent with Seshamani et al.'s findings regarding eight postoperative complications9, as well as Tung and Chang's findings concerning stroke10. In Taiwan, as hospitals have come under financial strain from global budgeting, leading to a reduction in revenue, they may be compelled to reduce operating expenses to preserve profit10. Approaches to reducing operating expenses may include reducing the quantity or quality of nursing staff, decreasing efforts to train and improve staff performance, curtailing investment in infrastructure, and lowering the levels and availability of care.9,10,38 Cutting operating expenses may lead to deficiencies in the quality of care, which patients with more severe diseases, including pneumonia, may be less able to withstand, so they will have higher mortality rates3,9,10. Previous studies showed that decreased nursing staff, lower educational levels of nurses or higher proportions of casual/temporary nurses were associated with higher mortality39–43.
Our study also confirms the volume-outcome relationship for pneumonia care6,21. One possible explanation for the relationship between higher physician volume and better pneumonia outcomes is the “practice makes perfect” hypothesis or a learning effect. Besides, there were marked differences in mortality among geographic regions. It is possible that regions with higher mortality are more rural or poorer.
There are some limitations of our study that deserve comment. First, similar to prior studies using administrative databases6,12,21, we have no information on clinical details for risk adjustment such as results according to the Pneumonia Severity Index, CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate, low blood pressure, age 65 years or older) or American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America (ATS/IDSA) 2007 criteria. However, we adjusted for patient gender, age, case severity and comorbid conditions, which are also important for adjustment of pneumonia complexity. Second, we have limited information on the structure/processes of pneumonia care delivery, influenza/pneumococcal vaccination and treatment adherence. Although we showed the impacts of weekend admissions, reimbursement cuts and physician volume on pneumonia mortality rates, this observational study could not identify the mechanisms through which these health care factors affect pneumonia outcome. It is possible that other unavailable variables such as the nurse staffing, medication use or timing of medication use may explain these relationships.
Our national longitudinal population-based study showed that male, older or severely ill patients with pneumonia have higher 30-day mortality rates, but there have been significant improvements in mortality among elderly patients over time. Pneumonia patients admitted on weekends have higher mortality than those admitted on weekdays. The mortality of pneumonia patients rises under increased financial strain from cuts in reimbursement. Higher physician volume is associated with lower mortality. Based on these findings, there is still opportunity for improvement regarding pneumonia care delivery. Health care policy-makers should determine what services and processes explain the differences in mortality between low-volume and high-volume physicians, between weekend and weekday admissions, and before and after the adoption of reimbursement cuts. Additional efforts to urge all providers to improve these services and processes might reduce the mortality rates from pneumonia even further. Quality improvement efforts may include establishing national protocols and guidelines, monitoring services and processes of care, increasing fees for deficient services and processes associated with outcomes and implementing a pay-for-performance initiative under cuts in reimbursement. Our study encourages further research identifying potentially remediable factors in reducing mortality among patients with pneumonia.
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by grants from the National Science Council (NSC97-2410-H-130-011) in Taiwan and is based in part on data from the National Health Insurance Research Database provided by the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health, and managed by the National Health Research Institutes. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of the Bureau of National Health Insurance, the Department of Health or the National Health Research Institutes.
Conflict of Interest
None disclosed.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/. Accessed October 31, 2011.
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Deaths and mortality. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm. Accessed October 31, 2011.
- 3.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Guide to inpatient quality indicators: quality of care in hospitals-volume, mortality, and utilization. Available at: http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Modules/iqi_resources.aspx. Accessed October 31, 2011.
- 4.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Mortality measures overview: publicly reporting risk-standardized, 30 day mortality measures for AMI, HF and PN. Available at: http://www.qualitynet.org/dcs/ContentServer?c=Page&pagename=QnetPublic%2FPage%2FQnetTier2&cid=1163010398556. Accessed October 31, 2011.
- 5.Department of Health & Human Services. Hospital Compare—a quality tool provided by Medicare. Available at: http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/Hospital/Search/Welcome.asp?version=default&browser=IE%7C7%7CWinXP&language=English&defaultstatus=0&MBPProviderID=&TargetPage=&ComingFromMBP=&CookiesEnabledStatus=&TID=&StateAbbr=&ZIP=&State=&pagelist=Home. Accessed October 31, 2011.
- 6.Marrie TJ, Carriere KC, Jin Y, Johnson DH. Mortality during hospitalisation for pneumonia in Alberta, Canada, is associated with physician volume. Eur Resp J. 2003;22:148–155. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00115703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bell CM, Redelmeier DA. Mortality among patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;345:663–668. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa003376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kostis WJ, Demissie K, Marcella SW, Shao Y-H, Wilson AC, Moreyra AE. Weekend versus weekday admission and mortality from myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;356:1099–1109. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Seshamani M, Zhu J, Volpp KG. Did postoperative mortality increase after the implementation of the Medicare Balanced Budget Act? Med. Care. 2006;44:527–533. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215886.49343.c6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tung YC, Chang GM. The effect of cuts in reimbursement on stroke outcome: a nationwide population-based study during the period 1998 to 2007. Stroke. 2010;41:504–509. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.568956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Inpatient quality indicators: technical specifications. Available at: http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Modules/IQI_TechSpec.aspx. Accessed October 31, 2011.
- 12.Bratzler DW, Normand S-LT, Wang Y, et al. An administrative claims model for profiling hospital 30 day mortality rates for pneumonia patients. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Mattera JA, et al. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30 day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2006;113:1683–1692. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.611186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mortensen EM, Coley CM, Singer DE, et al. Causes of death for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study. 2002;162:1059–64. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15.Lindenauer PK, Behal R, Murray CK, Wato N, Houck PM, Bratzler DW. Volume, quality of care, and outcome in pneumonia. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006;144:262–269. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-4-200602210-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Restrepo MI, Mortensen EM, Rello J, Brody J, Anzueto A. Late admission to the ICU in patients with community-acquired pneumonia is associated with higher mortality. Chest. 2010;137:552–557. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ruhnke GW, Coca-Perraillon M, Kitch BT, Cutler DM. Marked reduction in 30 day mortality among elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Am. J. Med. 2011;124:171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lien HM, Chou SY, Liu JT. Hospital ownership and performance: evidence from stroke and cardiac treatment in Taiwan. J. Health Econ. 2008;27:1208–1223. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tung YC, Chang GM, Chen YH. Associations of physician volume and weekend admissions with ischemic stroke outcome in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study. Med. Care. 2009;47:1018–1025. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a81144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Lin HC, Hwang YT. Does physicians’ case volume impact inpatient care costs for pneumonia cases? J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2008;23:304–309. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0462-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Chen CH, Hwang YT. Physician's case volume of intensive care unit pneumonia admissions and in-hospital mortality. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008;177:989–994. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200706-813OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–619. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bureau of National Health Insurance. The monetary value of each point under global budgeting. Available at: http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=20&menu_id=710&WD_ID=812&webdata_id=3630. Accessed October 31, 2011.
- 24.Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Scott A, Gauld R. Do hospital bed reduction and multiple system reform affect patient mortality?: a trend and multilevel analysis in New Zealand over the period 1988–2001. Med. Care. 2007;45:1186–1194. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181468c92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hsueh YS, Lee SY, Huang YT. Effects of global budgeting on the distribution of dentists and use of dental care in Taiwan. Health Serv. Res. 2004;39:2135–2153. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00336.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Learn PA, Bach PB. A decade of mortality reductions in major oncologic surgery: the impact of centralization and quality improvement. Med. Care. 2010;48:1041–1049. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f37d5f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rice N, Leyland A. Multilevel models: applications to health data. J Health Serv Policy. 1996;1:154–164. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Austin PC, Tu JV, Alter DA. Comparing hierarchical modeling with traditional logistic regression analysis among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: should we be analyzing cardiovascular outcomes data differently? Am. Heart J. 2003;145:27–35. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Roux AVD. A glossary for multilevel analysis. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 2002;56:588–594. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.8.588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hox JJ. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen YH, Liou SH, Chou CC, Su WL, Loh CH, Lin SH. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination of the elderly in Taiwan. 2004;22:2806–11. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.Wang ST, Lee LT, Chen LS, Chen TH. Economic evaluation of vaccination against influenza in the elderly: an experience from a population-based influenza vaccination program in Taiwan. 2005;23:1973–80. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34.Wang CS, Wang ST, Lai CT, Lin LJ, Chou P. Impact of influenza vaccination on major cause-specific mortality. 2007;25:1196–203. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Ruhnke GW, Coca-Perraillon M, Kitch BT, Cutler DM. Trends in mortality and medical spending in patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia: 1993–2005. Med. Care. 2010;48:1111–1116. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f38006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Foss NB, Kehlet H. Short-term mortality in hip fracture patients admitted during weekends and holidays. Br. J. Anaesth. 2006;96:450–454. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Saposnik G, Baibergenova A, Bayer N, Hachinski V. Weekends: a dangerous time for having a stroke? Stroke. 2007;38:1211–1215. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000259622.78616.ea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chang YC, Li YF, Wang FK, Cheng SH. The impact of global budgeting of National Health Insurance: a preliminary study on dental and primary care facilities. Taiwan J Public Health. 2006;25:152–162. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA. 2002;288:1987–1993. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.16.1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K. Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;346:1715–1722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Person SD, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, et al. Nurse staffing and mortality for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. Med. Care. 2004;42:4–12. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000102369.67404.b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Estabrooks CA, Midodzi WK, Cummings GG, Ricker KL, Giovannetti P. The impact of hospital nursing characteristics on 30 day mortality. Nurs. Res. 2005;54:74–84. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200503000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schilling PL, Campbell DA, Jr, Englesbe MJ, Davis MM. A comparison of in-hospital mortality risk conferred by high hospital occupancy, differences in nurse staffing levels, weekend admission, and seasonal influenza. Med. Care. 2010;48:224–232. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c162c0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]