Abstract
Background:
The five kashayams (kwaths - decoctions) Manjishtadi kashayam (MK), Rasna erandadi kashayam (REK), Sahacharadhi kashayam (SK), Maharasnadi (or Rasna dwiguna bhagam) kashayam (MRK) and Dhanwantharam kashayam (DK) are widely used in the management of diseases manifested due to vitiation of vata and vatarakta (mostly diseases of connective tissues, bones, joints and nervous system). Free radicals are generated subsequent to the inflammatory changes in such conditions, and these cytotoxic reactive oxygen species cause oxidative damage to the cells. Phenolic compounds are the most common water soluble antioxidant compounds in plants.
Objective:
The present study aims at evaluating the phenolic content and antioxidant properties of these five kashayams and their probable protective role in the management of vata vyadhis.
Materials and Method:
The total phenolic contents of these five Ayurvedic decoctions were determined using Folin-Ciocalteu method and the antioxidant properties were estimated by DPPH (2’2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazine) radical scavenging activity.
Result:
MK exhibited higher property (total phenolic content-15.61 ± 0.006 mg/g wt, EC50-7.2μg/ml) when compared to other kashayams. DK with phenolic content 12.056 ± 0.004 mg/g wt and 22 μg/ml effective concentration for 50% inhibition comes next in the present study. REK, SK and MRK show almost similar phenolic content and antioxidant property.
Conclusion:
From the observations, it is seen that the total phenolic content and the antioxidant property of the products justify the protective and corrective effects produced by the products in vata and vatarakta disorders.
Keywords: Antioxidants, free radicals, kashayam, phenols
INTRODUCTION
Kashayam (decoction) is an important primary dosage form in Ayurveda. It is effective in attaining various pharmacological actions like deepana,[1] pachana, shamana, shodhana, tarpana etc., when prepared according to classical guidelines, used in appropriate concentrations and clinical conditions. Manjishtadi kashayam (MK),[2] Rasna erandadi kashayam (REK),[2] Sahacharadhi kashayam (SK),[2] Maharasnadi (also known as Rasna dwiguna bhagam) kashayam (MRK),[2] are quoted in the classical text Sahasra Yogam and Dhanwantharam kashayam (DK)[3] is quoted in the classical text Ashtanga Hrudayam. These five formulations are extensively used in the treatment of vata and vata-rakta diseases.
In the management of vata vikaras, it is clearly indicated that in conditions where the vata alone is vitiated (no association with other doshas: pitta and kapha), one should initiate the treatment with snehana karma. But if other doshas are involved in pathogenesis along with vata, then snehana karma is contraindicated for treatment of the diseases.[4]
The formulations taken for the study are described in the texts of Ayurveda in the Kashayam form. The clinical indications of these formulations have the involvement of other dosas especially kapha. It is observed in clinical practice that in the management of vatavikaras with the association of other doshas especially kapha, the Kashaya formulations are very effective and they do the function of amahara also.
These formulations are studied for their total phenolic content and antioxidant properties. An attempt is made to correlate the clinical indications of these kashayams with the antioxidant property.
Diseases of connective tissues, bones, joints and nervous system are broadly included in vatavyadhis and vatarakta vikaras. Ayurveda as a system of medicine contributes profoundly to the wellness, curative and preventive aspects of these conditions.
In vatavyadhis, there is persistent inflammation in synovial membranes of joints, with migration of activated phagocytes and other leukocytes into synovial and periarticular tissue.[5] Free radicals are generated in the process of phagocytosis, and these cytotoxic reactive oxygen species cause oxidative damage to the cells[6] like destruction of membrane lipids, proteins, deoxyribonucleic acid and cartilage.
The enzymatic or free radical damage to proteins like IgG or collagen is also considered as a possibility that causes chronic inflammations in joints, local destruction of cartilage, bone and the systemic manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis.[7] A molecule capable of inhibiting the oxidation of other molecules is known as an antioxidant; it either prevents the reactive oxygen species from being formed or removes them before it damages vital components of the cell.[8] Oxidative stress occurs when there is an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants in favour of oxidants which causes damage.[9] Oxidative stress has been implicated in a wide variety of chronic inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus and psoriatic arthritis.
Phenolic compounds are the most common water soluble antioxidant compounds in plants.[10] The free radical scavenging role of the phenolic compounds is attributed to their unique structure.[11]
The phenolic compounds in the water extracts thereby take the role of antioxidants and play a protective role in vatavyadhis where the damage of bones and cartilage takes place.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ayurvedic formulations
All the five formulations included in this study were manufactured by ‘The Arya Vaidya Pharmacy’ (Coimbatore) Limited.
Determination of total phenolic content
The study materials in the form of a decoction were taken for the study. The total phenolic content was determined using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent.[12] Appropriately diluted standard and samples were made up to 3.5 ml with distilled water in a series of test tubes. These tubes were then treated with 0.5 ml 2 N Folin-Ciocalteus reagent and incubated for three minutes at room temperature. The reaction was then neutralized by the addition of 1 ml 20% sodium carbonate. The reaction mixture was then incubated at room temperature for ninety minutes after which the absorbance was read at 760 nm (Shimadzu UV Vis spectrophotometer, 1800). The results were expressed as gallic acid equivalent in milligram per gram of sample, using a standard curve generated with gallic acid.
DPPH radical scavenging activity
The antioxidant activities of the Ayurvedic formulations were estimated by DPPH (2’2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazine) radical scavenging activity.[13] Briefly, to various concentrations of the sample, methanolic solution containing DPPH radicals (0.1 mM) was added and shaken vigorously. The reaction mixture was then left to stand for thirty minutes in dark. After the incubation period the absorbance was measured at 517 nm against the corresponding test blanks. The percentage inhibition of DPPH free radical was calculated using the formula, % Inhibition=(Control-sample)/Control)×100.
The sample concentration providing 50% inhibition (EC50) was calculated from the graph of RSA (radical scavenging activity) percentage against sample concentration. Gallic acid was used as standard.
RESULTS
The results from total phenolic content determination and DPPH radical scavenging activity show that the Ayurvedic formulation, MK exhibited higher activity when compared to other kashayams [Tables 1, 2 and Figure 1]. DK with phenolic content 12.056 ± 0.004 mg/g and 22 mg/ml effective concentration for 50% inhibition comes next in the present study. The other three kashayams namely SK, MRK and REK exhibits almost similar activity with total phenolic content 10.61 ± 0.002 mg/g, 10.63 ± 0.006 mg/g, 10.31 ± 0.004 mg/g and percentage inhibition 36 μg/ml, 26 μg/ml and 40.48 μg/ml respectively.
Table 1.
Table 2.
DISCUSSION
MK which shows the maximum phenol content and most antioxidant property is a combination of forty five herbs as shown in the Table 1. It is a classical Ayurvedic combination detailed in the context of Vatarakta in sahasrayoga. The combination has a broad spectrum of activity ranging from astadasa kusta (a wide spectrum of skin diseases), vatarakta (rheumatoid arthritis), arditha (bells palsy) upadamsa (veneral diseases), sleepada (filariasis), prasupthi (numbness), pakshaghat (hemi plegia), medodosha (diseases related to fatty depositions) netra roga (eye disease) etc. In clinical practice it is observed that in conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, skin disorders and degenerative disorders like hemiplegia, Bell's palsy and eye diseases, where oxidative stress causes or worsens the disease process, MK is very effective. The combination of MK has many potent vatahara herbs which are also antioxidants like Rubia cordifolia,[14] Cedrus deodar,[15] Zingiber officinale,[16] Tinospora cordifolia,[17] Sida rhombifolia,[18] Triphala,[19] Hemidesmus indicus[20] etc. The antioxidant effect of the combination possibly makes it a useful combination in the treatment of vatavyadhis.
DK stands next in the phenol content and antioxidant property. It is a versatile product with forty ingredients. Even though it is indicated in the context of garbha vyapad (anomalies of pregnancy), it is effective in vatarogas (diseases affecting many connective tissues like bone, joints, ligaments, muscles and nervous system). It is also effective in traumatic conditions of bone and vital points. It is effectively used in bala rogas (pediatric diseases) and soothika vikaras (post partum care). It is also indicated in jwara (pyrexia), Gulma (flatulence), graham unmada (mental disorders) Moothraghata (urinary obstructions) and andra vriddhi (hernia).[21] It is clinically seen that in conditions subsequent to trauma and also in arthritis or degenerative conditions subsequent to trauma, this formulation is exceptionally advantageous. In traumatic cartilage and joint injury there is an increased production of reactive oxidant species and reduced antioxidant defence. As a result of this imbalance, cell death and degradation of extracellular matrix occur.[22] There is significant improvement in chondrocyte viability and protection against extracellular matrix damage, following joint injury when there is brief exposure to free radical scavengers.[23] OS (oxygen species) play a role in multiple physiological processes from oocyte maturation to fertilization and embryo development. Oxidative stress occurs due to excessive production of free radicals and/or impaired antioxidant defence mechanism. Studies point that excessive free radicals precipitate in female reproductive tract pathologies.[24] The antioxidant property of DK possibly takes care of the gynaecological anomalies.
MRK is the next product with highest antioxidant property. It is combination of twenty five herbs indicated in the context of vatavyadhis in sahasrayoga. It is effective in vatavyadhis, sarvangavata, pakshagata, apabhahugam, gridrasi, filariasis, andravridhi, sukla roga, linga roga, yoni roga, infertility. It is anabolic to body and helps in the management of infertility. In clinical practice it is observed that the brihmana (nourishing) nature of this formulation helps in the correction and redeeming painful conditions of vatavyadhis and also in correcting infertility. In both these conditions antooxidants play a vital role. The ingredients Asparagus racemosus,[25] Withania somnifera,[26] Kaempferia galangal,[27] are all nourishing herbs which are vatahara and also anti oxidant.
SK stands fourth in the antioxidant property of the Kashayams. It is indicated in vatavyadhis prakarana of sahasrayoga and is a combination of three herbs as shown in the table. It is particularly effective in the afflictions of lower limbs.
REK shows the least antioxidant property of the five kashayams indicated in vatarakta chapter of sahasrayoga. It is a combination of thirteen herbs as shown in the table. It is also indicated in ekanga vatam (hemiplegia) swasa kasa (respiratory disorders) kanda rogas (disease of throat) soothika roga (diseases in post partum stage), jihwa sthambam (paralysis of lingual muscles), (filariasis).
The phenol content of the formulations MRK, SK and REK is comparable.
From the observations, it is seen that the antioxidant property of the products substantiate the clinical indications of the products, where oxidative stress affects the system and the products provide corrective or protective functions in the conditions. The comparison of the antioxidant property is done to provide an idea on the sequence of the formulations which could be effectively used in an oxidative stress induced condition associated with the vata and vatarakta disorders.
CONCLUSION
The sequence of the kashayams in the descending order of the antioxidant property is as follows: MK, DK, MRK, SK and REK. The phenolic content is highest in MK, followed by DK. The phenolic content of MRK, SK and REK are comparable. The antioxidant properties of the kashayams justify the protective and corrective effects produced by the products.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are grateful to Padmasree Sri P. R Krishnakumar, Managing director, The Arya Vaidya Pharmacy Coimbatore limited for providing the facilities and encouragement to carry out the study. We are thankful to Dr. Neeraj. P.T, Research officer R and D division The Arya Vaidya Pharmacy Coimbatore limited for his consistent support throughout the work.
Footnotes
Source of Support: Nil,
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Reddy RK, Kalpana A. Bhaishajya Kalpana Vijnanam. 3rd ed. Varanasi, India: Choukambha Sanskrit Sansthan Publishers; 2004. p. 165. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Krishnan Vaidyan AK, Anekkalil, Gopalapilla S. Kashaya yogas. Sahasrayogam. 21st ed. Alappuzha: Vidhyarambham Publishers; 1996. pp. 77–85. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Upadhyaya YN, editor. Ashtanga Hridaya of Vagbhata, Shareera Sthanam; Garbhavyapad: Chapter 2, Verse 47-52. Varanasi: Chowkhambha Sanskrit Publishers; 2006. p. 180. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vatavyadhichikitsa. 5th ed. Varanasi, India: Choukambha Sanskrit Sansthan Publishers; 1975. Vagbhata. Chikitsa Sthanam. Chapter 21. Vatavyadhichikitsa. Vaidyasri Yadunandana Upadhyaya. Ashtangahridaya; p. 716. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mulherin D, Fitzgerald O, Bresnihan B. The relationship between macrophage populations in the synovium and articular damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37:783–9. doi: 10.1002/art.1780390116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Park DV, Sapota A. Chemical toxicity and reactive oxygen species. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1996;9:331–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Davidson . Diseases of connective tissues, joints and bones. In: Macleod J, editor. Principles and Practice of medicine. 15th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone ELBS Publishers; 1987. p. 555. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Davies KJ. Oxidative stress. The paradox of aerobic life. Biochem Soc Symp. 1995;61:1–31. doi: 10.1042/bss0610001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sies H. Oxidative stress-oxidants and antioxidants. Exp Physiol. 1997;82:291–5. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1997.sp004024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Machiex JJ, Fleuriet A, Billot J. Fruit phenolics. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shahidi F, Wanasundara PK. Phenolic antioxidants. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1992;32:67–103. doi: 10.1080/10408399209527581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colometric of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Viticulture. 1965;16:144–58. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Blois MS. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature. 1958;29:1199–200. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kaur P, Singh B, Kumar S, Kaur S. In vitro evaluation of free radical scavenging of Rubia cordifolia. J Chin Clin Med. 2008;3:278–84. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tiwar AK, Srinivas PV, Kumar SP, Rao JM. Free radical scavenging active components from Cedrus deodra. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:4642–5. doi: 10.1021/jf010573a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stoilova A, Krastanov A, Stoyanova, Denev P, Gargova S. Antioxidant activity of ginger extract (Zingiber officinale) Food Chem. 2007;102:764–70. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bhawya D, Anilakumar KR. In vitro antioxidant potency of Tinospora cordifolia in sequential extracts. Int J Pharm Biol Arch. 2010;1:448–56. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Narendhirakannan RT, Limmy TP. In vitro antioxidant studies on ethanolic extracts of leaf, stem and root of Sida Rhombifolia. Int J Pharm Biosci. 2010;1:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nailk GH, Priyadarsini KI, Bhagirathi RG, Mishra B, Banavalikar MM, Harimohan In vitro antioxidant studies and free radical reactions of thriphala, an Ayurvedic formulation and its constituents. Phytother Res. 2005;19:582–6. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zahin M, Aqil F, Ahamed I. The in vitro antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of four Indian medicinal plants. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2009;1:88–95. [Google Scholar]
- 21.5th ed. Varanasi, India: Choukambha Sanskrit Sansthan Publishers; 1975. Vagbhata. Sareera Sthanan. Chapter 2. Garbhavyapad. Vaidyasri Yadunandana Upadhyaya. Ashtangahridaya; p. 180. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Martin JA, Brown T, Heiner A, Buckwalter JA. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: The role of accelerated chondrocyte senescence. Biorheology. 2004;41:479–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kurz B, Lemke A, Kehn M, Domm C, Patwari P, Frank E, et al. Influence of tissue maturation and antioxidants on the apoptotic response of articular cartilage after injurious compression. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:123–30. doi: 10.1002/art.11438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma RK. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005;3:28. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-3-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dohare S, Shuaib M, Naquvi KJ. In vitro antioxidant activity of Asparagus racemosus roots. Int Journal Bio Res. 2011;4:228–35. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Panchawat S. In vitro free radical scavenging activity of leaves extracts of withania somnifera. Recent Res Sci Technol. 2011;3:40–3. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zaroung S, Plubrukarn A, Keawpradub N. Cytotoxic and free radical scavenging activities of Zingeberaceous rhizomes. Songklanak J Sci Technol. 2005;27:799–812. [Google Scholar]