Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1990 Dec 11;18(23):6853–6856. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.23.6853

DNA-sequence recognition by CAP: role of the adenine N6 atom of base pair 6 of the DNA site.

A Gunasekera 1, Y W Ebright 1, R H Ebright 1
PMCID: PMC332741  PMID: 2175880

Abstract

Two similar, but not identical, models have been proposed for the amino acid-base pair contacts in the CAP-DNA complex ('Model I,' Weber, I. and Steitz, T., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81, 3973-3977, 1984; 'Model II,' Ebright, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81, 7274-7278, 1984). One difference between the two models involves Glu181 of CAP. Model I predicts that Glu181 of CAP makes two specificity determining contacts: one H-bond with the cytosine N4 atom of G:C at base pair 7 of the DNA half site, and one H-bond with the adenine N6 atom of T:A at base pair 6 of the DNA half site. In contrast, Model II predicts that Glu181 makes only one specificity determining contact: one H-bond with the cytosine N4 atom of G:C at base pair 7 of the DNA half site. In the present work, we show that replacement of T:A at base pair 6 of the DNA half site by T:N6-methyl-adenine has no, or almost no, effect on the binding of CAP. We conclude, contrary to Model I, that Glu181 of CAP makes no contact with the adenine N6 atom of base pair 6 of the DNA half site.

Full text

PDF
6853

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berg O. G., von Hippel P. H. Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. II. The binding specificity of cyclic AMP receptor protein to recognition sites. J Mol Biol. 1988 Apr 20;200(4):709–723. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90482-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennan C. A., Van Cleve M. D., Gumport R. I. The effects of base analogue substitutions on the cleavage by the EcoRI restriction endonuclease of octadeoxyribonucleotides containing modified EcoRI recognition sequences. J Biol Chem. 1986 Jun 5;261(16):7270–7278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ebright R. H., Cossart P., Gicquel-Sanzey B., Beckwith J. Molecular basis of DNA sequence recognition by the catabolite gene activator protein: detailed inferences from three mutations that alter DNA sequence specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(23):7274–7278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.23.7274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ebright R. H., Cossart P., Gicquel-Sanzey B., Beckwith J. Mutations that alter the DNA sequence specificity of the catabolite gene activator protein of E. coli. Nature. 1984 Sep 20;311(5983):232–235. doi: 10.1038/311232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ebright R. H., Ebright Y. W., Gunasekera A. Consensus DNA site for the Escherichia coli catabolite gene activator protein (CAP): CAP exhibits a 450-fold higher affinity for the consensus DNA site than for the E. coli lac DNA site. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Dec 25;17(24):10295–10305. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.24.10295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ebright R. H., Gunasekera A., Zhang X. P., Kunkel T. A., Krakow J. S. Lysine 188 of the catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) plays no role in specificity at base pair 7 of the DNA half site. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Mar 25;18(6):1457–1464. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.6.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ebright R. H., Kolb A., Buc H., Kunkel T. A., Krakow J. S., Beckwith J. Role of glutamic acid-181 in DNA-sequence recognition by the catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) of Escherichia coli: altered DNA-sequence-recognition properties of [Val181]CAP and [Leu181]CAP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6083–6087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eilen E., Pampeno C., Krakow J. S. Production and properties of the alpha core derived from the cyclic adenosine monophosphate receptor protein of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1978 Jun 27;17(13):2469–2473. doi: 10.1021/bi00606a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Engel J. D., von Hippel P. H. Effects of methylation on the stability of nucleic acid conformations. Studies at the polymer level. J Biol Chem. 1978 Feb 10;253(3):927–934. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fazakerley G. V., Téoule R., Guy A., Fritzsche H., Guschlbauer W. NMR studies on oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing the dam methylation site GATC. Comparison between d(GGATCC) and d(GGm6ATCC). Biochemistry. 1985 Aug 13;24(17):4540–4548. doi: 10.1021/bi00338a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fersht A. R., Shi J. P., Knill-Jones J., Lowe D. M., Wilkinson A. J., Blow D. M., Brick P., Carter P., Waye M. M., Winter G. Hydrogen bonding and biological specificity analysed by protein engineering. Nature. 1985 Mar 21;314(6008):235–238. doi: 10.1038/314235a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Frederick C. A., Quigley G. J., van der Marel G. A., van Boom J. H., Wang A. H., Rich A. Methylation of the EcoRI recognition site does not alter DNA conformation: the crystal structure of d(CGCGAm6ATTCGCG) at 2.0-A resolution. J Biol Chem. 1988 Nov 25;263(33):17872–17879. doi: 10.2210/pdb4dnb/pdb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:293–321. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.001453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pastan I., Adhya S. Cyclic adenosine 5'-monophosphate in Escherichia coli. Bacteriol Rev. 1976 Sep;40(3):527–551. doi: 10.1128/br.40.3.527-551.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Quignard E., Fazakerley G. V., Teoule R., Guy A., Guschlbauer W. Consequences of methylation on the amino group of adenine. A proton two-dimensional NMR study of d(GGATATCC) and d(GGm6ATATCC). Eur J Biochem. 1985 Oct 1;152(1):99–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb09168.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rinkel L. J., van der Marel G. A., van Boom J. H., Altona C. Influence of N6-methylation of residue A(5) on the conformational behaviour of d(C-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-G) in solution studied by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. 1. The duplex form. Eur J Biochem. 1987 Mar 2;163(2):275–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb10798.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Takeda Y., Ohlendorf D. H., Anderson W. F., Matthews B. W. DNA-binding proteins. Science. 1983 Sep 9;221(4615):1020–1026. doi: 10.1126/science.6308768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Warwicker J., Engelman B. P., Steitz T. A. Electrostatic calculations and model-building suggest that DNA bound to CAP is sharply bent. Proteins. 1987;2(4):283–289. doi: 10.1002/prot.340020404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weber I. T., Steitz T. A. Model of specific complex between catabolite gene activator protein and B-DNA suggested by electrostatic complementarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(13):3973–3977. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.13.3973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Weber I. T., Steitz T. A. Structure of a complex of catabolite gene activator protein and cyclic AMP refined at 2.5 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1987 Nov 20;198(2):311–326. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90315-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang X. P., Ebright R. H. Identification of a contact between arginine-180 of the catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) and base pair 5 of the DNA site in the CAP-DNA complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4717–4721. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. de Crombrugghe B., Busby S., Buc H. Cyclic AMP receptor protein: role in transcription activation. Science. 1984 May 25;224(4651):831–838. doi: 10.1126/science.6372090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES