Skip to main content
Interventional Neuroradiology logoLink to Interventional Neuroradiology
. 2008 Oct 9;14(Suppl 1):77–80. doi: 10.1177/15910199080140S114

The Potential of Flow Modification in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

I Szikora *,1, PK Nelson **, Z Berentei *, Z Kulcsar *, M Marosfoi *, A Berez ***
PMCID: PMC3328058  PMID: 20557779

Abstract

Background and purpose: To summarize the theoretical background and existing technical achievements of flow modification techniques in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

The evolution of the concept of flow modification for aneurysm treatment is overviewed within the published literature on application of stents for aneurysms. The newest achievements using dedicated flow modifying devices is discussed.

Reconstruction of laminar flow within intracranial arteries harboring aneurysms is feasible. Reorientation of flow using dedicated flow modifying devices is a highly effective technique in the treatment of large, broad neck, otherwise untreatable aneurysms.

Key words: Angiography, Brain endovascular treatments, Interventional Neuroradiology

Introduction

The application of stents for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms has been first proposed in the early 90's 1-3. During the early years of application of this technique the primary goal was the geometrical reconstruction of the parent artery in order to promote packing of the aneurysm. Flow conditions within the parent artery and the aneurysm itself have long been considered as playing an important role in aneurysm growth and rupture 4-11. With the latest technologies, flow modification within and around the aneurysm became the primary objective of using stent-like flow modifying devices in aneurysm treatment. Preliminary results of the first clinical application of such devices will be discussed.

Experimental background

The therapeutic potential of intravascular stent technology has been raised and its technical feasibility assessed in animal experiments in the early 1990's 1-3. It was hypothesized, that the effect of stents on endovascular aneurysm treatment may be influenced by three mechanisms. First, anatomical/geometrical reconstruction of the parent artery with stent across a wide necked aneurysm facilitates dense aneurysm packing without compromising the lumen of the parent artery. Secondly, a stent placed across the aneurysm neck may alter the local flow dynamics by diverting flow streams and reducing the free surface area of the orifice. These may result in slow flow and thrombosis inside the aneurysm cavity. Finally, the mesh of the stent may serve as a framework for the proliferating intima to cover the aneurysm orifice and permanently separate it from the lumen of the parent artery 1.

The potential hemodynamic effects of stents were further evaluated in laboratory experiments. It was demonstrated, that depending on their mesh density, stents are capable of reducing vortex flow within the aneurysm and flow interaction between the sac and the parent vessel 12. It was also shown, that besides the porosity, the geometrical design of the stent also has an impact on aneurysm thrombosis, depending on the local flow patterns 13,14.

Clinical experience with morphological reconstruction of the parent artery using stents (stent supported aneurysm packing)

Clinical reports published to date mostly focus on the mechanical effect of balloon expandable and self expandable stents that makes aneurysm packing feasible even if the neck is wide. In 1997, Higashida reported a fusiform BA aneurysm that was treated with a Palmaz-Schatz stent and GDC coils 15. Since than, several case reports were published on successful combined stent implantation and coil packing. This technique was used to treat dissecting aneurysms of the cervical 16-18 and the intracranial ICA 19, 20 and rather frequently for dissecting and fusiform vertebrobasilar aneurysms 21-26. Some of these patients were treated in acute subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH)15,21,22,25,26.

In 2002 Lylyk reported a large series of intracranial stent implantations including 72 cases treated for aneurysms. They achieved complete or nearly complete occlusion of berry aneurysms in 97% and of dissecting aneurysms in 100% 27.

In 2003 Wanke reported 3 cases that were successfully treated with a self-expandable stent system 28. The same system was used to treat a bifurcation aneurysm applying a kissing stent technique 29. Following the application of modified, balloon expandable coronary stents 30, open cell, self expandable, dedicated intracranial stents became available for the morphological reconstruction of the parent vessel across the aneurysm's orifice 30-38. More recently, closed cell design self expandable stents were added to the therapeutic arsenal. This system is supposed to provide better conformity and opposition to the parent artery's wall and better coverage of the aneurysm neck 39-41. In recent years, the application of stent supported aneurysm packing became a standard procedure.

Early evidence of the flow modifying effects of stents

This experience demonstrated, that stents not only provide a possibility for coil packing of broad neck aneurysms, but significantly improve the long term stability of aneurysm treatment even in the case of lower packing density 30,36. In addition, several aneurysms have been found to thrombose spontaneously after stent placement alone. Lylik found 5 small aneurysms among 72 cases 37 and Fiorella published another five dissecting aneurysms thrombosing without coil packing 36. These results confirmed, that besides of the mechanical support of anatomical parent vessel reconstruction, stents either have an effect on the flow within the parent artery and/or facilitate intimal growth within the parent vessel. Other publications described complete aneurysm thrombosis of giant aneurysms following double stent coverage of the orifice without coil packing 30. This highlights the significance of stent design as proposed by Lieber and Barath earlier in experimental studies 12-14. These observations moved the concept from geometrical to functional reconstruction of the parent artery meaning remodeling not only the anatomy, but also the flow within the parent vessel.

The new concept: restoration of laminar flow within the parent artery as the primary goal of stent implantation

The most straightforward way of reconstructing laminar flow within the parent artery is the deployment of covered stents across the aneurysm orifice. Although as of today, no dedicated intracranial stent graft is commercially available, coronary and peripheral covered stents can be and have been successfully applied in proximal sections of the circle of Willis 42. One paper reports on the successful application of a prototype intracranial covered stent 43. Since covered stents block completely the flow through the entrance of the aneurysm, thrombosis of the sack is immediate. However, this technique is strictly limited to vascular sections, that do not give rise to important side branches or perforators, since their occlusion will certainly follow.

To broaden the application of flow modifying devices, special stent-like designs have been developed and tested. Stents consisting of multiple layers of braided wire-mesh tubes may have a porosity that is small enough to significantly reduce flow across the aneurysm orifice but without blocking the laminar flow towards side branches. In addition, unlike most covered stents, these devices reserve the flexibility that is needed for smooth intracranial delivery. The effect of such multilayer stents (Cardiatis stent, Cardiatis, Belgium) have been studied by flow simulation (www.cardiatis.com/images/ stories/info/fluid-19%28105%29_c.wailliez_ g.coussement_fpms), in silicon flow models (www.cardiatis.com/images/stories/info/etud e%20luca%20in%20vitro), in animal experiments (www.cardiatis.com/images/stories/info 06-aortic-vein-pig-model) and human peripheral aneurysms 44.

The first clinical experience with dedicated flow modifying devices

Alternately, high mesh density, woven wire mesh tube flow modifying devices can now be applied to treat human side wall intracranial aneurysms. Depending on the flow conditions, size of the aneurysm and that of the neck, these devices can be applied either as a single piece, or multiple devices can be deployed within each other in a co-axial fashion. In practice, a multilayer stent is created this way on site, that is specifically tailored to the specific flow and geometry of the aneurysm to be treated.

Clinical application of one such device, the Silk stent (Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France) has been reported (Patrick A. Brouwer: Placement of the new silk stent. Presented at the 4th Intracranial Stent Meeting, 2008, Ankara, Turkey). Utilization of another high mesh density flow modifying device, the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED, Chestnut Medical Technologies, Menlo Park, CA, USA) has been tested experimentally and used clinically. This device is made of woven wire mesh tube with pore sizes ranging from 0,65-0,43 mm in diameter. Mathematical calculations demonstrate that one such device is capable of reducing the circulation by 61% and the average kinetic energy of the flowing blood by 81%. inside the aneurysm. Electron microscopic studies demonstrate full endothelial coverage of the aneurysm ostium and patency of the origin of side branches in animal experiments using the rabbit subclavian artery. This device has been tested in a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized study, the PITA trial enrolling 31 patients with 31 aneurysms, 28 located on the internal carotid, 1 on the middle cerebral and 2 on the vertebral arteries. Half the cases was treated with PED only, and the other half of the aneurysms received additional coil packing. There was a 100% procedural success rate, 2 patients suffered stroke as a complication, the mortality was 0%. At 6 months, 2 aneurysms had residual flow, the rest was completely occluded.

In our own experience, we treated a total of 19 aneurysms in 18 patients, 7 of them as part the PITA trial. Three aneurysms were giant, 11 large and 2 were small. By angiography, significant reduction of flow was achieved in all cases following deployment of one or more PED. Clinically, one patient developed a small visual field deficit due to a retinal branch embolization, one patient had a serious contrast reaction, one had a minor stroke due to in-stent thrombosis that resolved completely and one patient died due to rupture of a coexisting aneurysm.

Out of the 19, a total of 18 aneurysms had 6 months follow up angiography so far. All but one was completely occluded and the parent vessel remodeled. One giant aneurysm had partial filling at 6 months. All symptomatic patients except one experienced clinical improvement of their cranial nerve symptoms.

Conclusion

Restoring laminar flow across the aneurysm orifice is a viable concept for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Currently available technology allows for the safe and effective application of flow modifying devices for the treatment of proximal intracranial side wall aneurysms. Acknowledgments: this work was partially supported a grant from the Hungarian National Scientific and Research Fund (OTKA 73773).

References

  • 1.Szikora I, et al. Combined use of stents and coils to treat experimental wide-necked carotid aneurysms: preliminary results. Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:1091–102. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Turjman F, et al. Combined stent implantation and endosaccular coil placement for treatment of experimental wide-necked aneurysms: a feasibility study in swine. Am J Neuroradiol, 1994;15:1087–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Massoud TF, et al. Endovascular treatment of fusiform aneurysms with stents and coils: technical feasibility in a swine model. Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16:1953–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Burleson AC, Strother CM, Turitto VT. Computer modeling of intracranial saccular and lateral aneurysms for the study of their hemodynamics. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:774–84. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199510000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cebral JR, et al. Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2550–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Foutrakis GN, Yonas H, Sclabassi RJ. Finite element methods in the simulation and analysis of intracranial blood flow. Neurol Res. 1997:174–86. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1997.11740793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Foutrakis GN, Yonas H, Sclabassi RJ. Saccular aneurysm formation in curved and bifurcating arteries. Am J Neuroradiol. 1990;20:1309–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Graves VB, et al. Flow dynamics of lateral carotid artery aneurysms and their effects on coils and balloons: an experimental study in dogs. Am J Neuroradiol. 1992;13:89–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jou LD, et al. Computational approach to quantifying hemodynamic forces in giant cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1804–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kerber CW, Heilman CB. Flow in experimental berry aneurysms: method and model. Am J Neuroradiol. 1983;4:374–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Strother CM. In vitro study of haemodynamics in a giant saccular aneurysm model: influence of flow dynamics in the parent vessel and effects of coil embolisation. Neuroradiology. 1995;37:159–61. doi: 10.1007/BF00588636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lieber BB, Stancampiano AP, Wakhloo AK. Alteration of hemodynamics in aneurysm models by stenting: influence of stent porosity. Ann Biomed Eng. 1997;25:460–9. doi: 10.1007/BF02684187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lieber BB, Gounis MJ. The physics of endoluminal stenting in the treatment of cerebrovascular aneurysms. Neurol Res. 2002;24:33–42. doi: 10.1179/016164102101200014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Barath K, et al. Anatomically shaped internal carotid artery aneurysm in vitro model for flow analysis to evaluate stent effect. Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1750–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Higashida RT, et al. Intravascular stent and endovascular coil placement for a ruptured fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:944–9. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.6.0944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Berkmen T, Troffkin N, Wakhloo AK. Direct percutaneous puncture of a cervical internal carotid artery aneurysm for coil placement after previous incomplete stentassisted endovascular treatment. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1230–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Collignon FP, et al. Transcutaneous coil, stent, and balloon migration following endovascular treatment of a cervical carotid artery aneurysm. Case illustration. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:1135. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Klein GE, et al. Posttraumatic extracranial aneurysm of the internal carotid artery: combined endovascular treatment with coils and stents. Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:1261–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Irie K, et al. Treatment of a spontaneous intracranial dissecting aneurysm with stent-assisted coil embolization. Neuroradiology. 2003;45:825–9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-003-0972-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee CY, et al. Traumatic aneurysm of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery and an associated carotid-cavernous fistula: vascular reconstruction performed using intravascular implantation of stents and coils. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:115–9. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.1.0115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Horowitz MB, et al. Transluminal stent-assisted coil embolization of a vertebral confluence aneurysm: technique report. Surg Neurol. 2001;55:291–6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(01)00421-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lylyk P, et al. Treatment of a vertebral dissecting aneurysm with stents and coils: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:385–8. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199808000-00132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lylyk P, et al. Combined endovascular treatment of dissecting vertebral artery aneurysms by using stents and coils. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:427–32. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.94.3.0427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Morizane A, et al. Combined endovascular stent implantation and coil embolization for the treatment of a vertebro-basilar fusiform aneurysm: technical case report. No Shinkei Geka. 2000;28:811–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sekhon LH, et al. Combined endovascular stent implantation and endosaccular coil placement for the treatment of a wide-necked vertebral artery aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:380–384. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199808000-00127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sugiu K, et al. Rebleeding of a vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm during stent-assisted coil embolization: a pitfall of the "stent and coil" technique. Surg Neurol. 2004;61:365–370. doi: 10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00515-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lylyk P, et al. Endovascular reconstruction of intracranial arteries by stent placement and combined techniques. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:1306–13. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.6.1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wanke I, et al. Treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with a self-expanding stent system: initial clinical experience. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1192–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Henkes H, et al. Coil treatment of a fusiform upper basilar trunk aneurysm with a combination of "kissing" neuroform stents, TriSpan-, 3D- and fibered coils, and permanent implantation of the microguidewires. Neuroradiology. 2004 doi: 10.1007/s00234-004-1192-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Szikora I, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with parent vessel reconstruction using balloon and self expandable stents. Acta Neurochir. 2006;148:711–723. doi: 10.1007/s00701-006-0785-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Benitez RP, et al. Endovascular occlusion of widenecked aneurysms with a new intracranial microstent (Neuroform) and detachable coils. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:1359–68. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000124484.87635.cd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fiorella D, et al. Preliminary experience using the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:6–17. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000097194.35781.ea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Howington JU, et al. The Neuroform stent, the first microcatheter-delivered stent for use in the intracranial circulation. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:2–5. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000099370.05758.4d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li YX, et al. Application of Neuroform stent in the treatment of intracranial aneurysm. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2004;26:647–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cross DT, 3rd, et al. Neuroform stent deployment for treatment of a basilar tip aneurysm via a posterior communicating artery route. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2578–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fiorella D, et al. Usefulness of the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: results at initial (3-6-mo) follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:1191–1202. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000159645.86823.af. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lylyk P, et al. Buenos Aires experience with the Neuroform self-expanding stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:235–41. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sani S, Lopes DK. Treatment of a middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysm using a double neuroform stent "Y" configuration and coil embolization: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:E209. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000163684.75204.cd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Weber W, et al. A new self-expanding nitinol stent (Enterprise) for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: initial clinical and angiographic results in 31 aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:555–61. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0232-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Peluso JP, et al. A New Self-Expandable Nitinol Stent for the Treatment of Wide-Neck Aneurysms: Initial Clinical Experience. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lubicz B, et al. Preliminary experience with the enterprise stent for endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: potential advantages and limiting characteristics. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:1063–70. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325868.06764.de. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Saatci I, et al. Treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms with a covered stent: experience in 24 patients with mid-term follow-up results. Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1742–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li MH, et al. The Feasibility and Efficacy of Treatment with a Willis Covered Stent in Recurrent Intracranial Aneurysms after Coiling. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Henry M, et al. Treatment of renal artery aneurysm with the multilayer stent. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:231–6. doi: 10.1583/07-2222.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Interventional Neuroradiology are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES