Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1990 Dec 25;18(24):7397–7406. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.24.7397

Loosened nucleosome linker folding in transcriptionally active chromatin of chicken embryo erythrocyte nuclei.

S A Grigoryev 1, K S Spirin 1, I A Krasheninnikov 1
PMCID: PMC332878  PMID: 2259630

Abstract

We have investigated the mechanism of the electrophoresis-driven chromatin aggregation which had been described by Weintraub (1984, Cell 38, 17-27) as a putative mean for propagation of genetic repression in eukaryotes. We show that the oligonucleosome aggregates are assembled de novo at the starting zone of DNP electrophoresis. A new system of native two-dimensional DNP electrophoresis has been worked out to separate the oligonucleosome aggregates ('A' particles) and the freely-migrating oligonucleosomes ('B' particles). The 'B' particle fraction which is derived from transcriptionally-active chromatin regions undergoes an extensive nuclease degradation of its DNA termini during the nuclease digestion. This fraction is partially depleted of histones H1 and H5 and is enriched in HMG nonhistone proteins. 'A' particles comprise the repressed chromatin DNA fragments which are about 60 b.p. longer than the corresponding DNA oligomers of 'B' particles. An oligonucleosome preparation containing the elongated DNA oligomers has been also isolated by means of sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation. Exonuclease III mapping reveals that the two chromatin fractions differ by an extent of terminal linker DNA trimming during the Micrococcal nuclease digestion rather than by the nucleosome repeat length. The complex character of nuclease digestion is not observed when the chromatin is digested in solution after the nuclear lysis. We argue that the protection of terminal oligonucleosome linkers is due to selective condensation of inactive chromatin in chicken erythrocyte nuclei and that the terminal DNA tails together with linker histones bound to them mediate the aggregation of repressed chromatin fragments.

Full text

PDF
7397

Images in this article

7399Image
on p.7399
7400Image
on p.7400
7401Image
on p.7401
7402Image
on p.7402
7403Image
on p.7403
7404Image
on p.7404
7404Image
on p.7404
7405Image
on p.7405

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bavykin S. G., Usachenko S. I., Zalensky A. O., Mirzabekov A. D. Structure of nucleosomes and organization of internucleosomal DNA in chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1990 Apr 5;212(3):495–511. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90328-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellard M., Dretzen G., Bellard F., Kaye J. S., Pratt-Kaye S., Chambon P. Hormonally induced alterations of chromatin structure in the polyadenylation and transcription termination regions of the chicken ovalbumin gene. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):567–574. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04248.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blobel G. Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(24):8527–8529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caplan A., Kimura T., Gould H., Allan J. Perturbation of chromatin structure in the region of the adult beta-globin gene in chicken erythrocyte chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jan 5;193(1):57–70. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90626-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Compton J. L., Bellard M., Chambon P. Biochemical evidence of variability in the DNA repeat length in the chromatin of higher eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Dec;73(12):4382–4386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.12.4382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Filipski J., Leblanc J., Youdale T., Sikorska M., Walker P. R. Periodicity of DNA folding in higher order chromatin structures. EMBO J. 1990 Apr;9(4):1319–1327. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08241.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Finch J. T., Klug A. Solenoidal model for superstructure in chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jun;73(6):1897–1901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.1897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grigoryev S. A., Krasheninnikov I. A. A topological model for chromatin transcription and a role for nucleosome linkers. FEBS Lett. 1983 Oct 3;162(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(83)81037-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Groudine M., Weintraub H. Propagation of globin DNAase I-hypersensitive sites in absence of factors required for induction: a possible mechanism for determination. Cell. 1982 Aug;30(1):131–139. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90019-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HELMKAMP R. W., GOODLAND R. L., BALE W. F., SPAR I. L., MUTSCHLER L. E. High specific activity iodination of gamma-globulin with iodine-131 monochloride. Cancer Res. 1960 Nov;20:1495–1500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hannon R., Bateman E., Allan J., Harborne N., Gould H. Control of RNA polymerase binding to chromatin by variations in linker histone composition. J Mol Biol. 1984 Nov 25;180(1):131–149. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90434-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hutchison N., Weintraub H. Localization of DNAase I-sensitive sequences to specific regions of interphase nuclei. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(2 Pt 1):471–482. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90177-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jorcano J. L., Meyer G., Day L. A., Renz M. Aggregation of small oligonucleosomal chains into 300-A globular particles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6443–6447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kimura T., Mills F. C., Allan J., Gould H. Selective unfolding of erythroid chromatin in the region of the active beta-globin gene. Nature. 1983 Dec 15;306(5944):709–712. doi: 10.1038/306709a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kukushkin A. N., Svetlikova S. B., Pospelov V. A. A structure of potentially active and inactive genes of chicken erythrocyte chromatin upon decondensation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Sep 12;16(17):8555–8569. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.17.8555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lawson G. M., Tsai M. J., O'Malley B. W. Deoxyribonuclease I sensitivity of the nontranscribed sequences flanking the 5' and 3' ends of the ovomucoid gene and the ovalbumin and its related X and Y genes in hen oviduct nuclei. Biochemistry. 1980 Sep 16;19(19):4403–4441. doi: 10.1021/bi00560a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Levinger L., Barsoum J., Varshavsky A. Two-dimensional hybridization mapping of nucleosomes. comparison of DNA and protein patterns. J Mol Biol. 1981 Mar 5;146(3):287–304. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90389-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Loening U. E. The fractionation of high-molecular-weight ribonucleic acid by polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis. Biochem J. 1967 Jan;102(1):251–257. doi: 10.1042/bj1020251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lois R., Freeman L., Villeponteau B., Martinson H. G. Active beta-globin gene transcription occurs in methylated, DNase I-resistant chromatin of nonerythroid chicken cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;10(1):16–27. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.1.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Marion C., Roux B., Coulet P. R. Role of histones H1 and H3 in the maintenance of chromatin in a compact conformation. Study with an immobilized enzyme. FEBS Lett. 1983 Jul 4;157(2):317–321. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(83)80568-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Meinkoth J., Wahl G. Hybridization of nucleic acids immobilized on solid supports. Anal Biochem. 1984 May 1;138(2):267–284. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90808-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nacheva G. A., Guschin D. Y., Preobrazhenskaya O. V., Karpov V. L., Ebralidse K. K., Mirzabekov A. D. Change in the pattern of histone binding to DNA upon transcriptional activation. Cell. 1989 Jul 14;58(1):27–36. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90399-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nicolas R. H., Wright C. A., Cockerill P. N., Wyke J. A., Goodwin G. H. The nuclease sensitivity of active genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Feb 11;11(3):753–772. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.3.753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Prior C. P., Cantor C. R., Johnson E. M., Littau V. C., Allfrey V. G. Reversible changes in nucleosome structure and histone H3 accessibility in transcriptionally active and inactive states of rDNA chromatin. Cell. 1983 Oct;34(3):1033–1042. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90561-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ridsdale J. A., Davie J. R. Chicken erythrocyte polynucleosomes which are soluble at physiological ionic strength and contain linker histones are highly enriched in beta-globin gene sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):1081–1096. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.3.1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith R. D., Yu J., Annunziato A., Seale R. L. beta-Globin gene family in murine erythroleukemia cells resides within two chromatin domains differing in higher order structure. Biochemistry. 1984 Jun 19;23(13):2970–2976. doi: 10.1021/bi00308a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Spadafora C., Oudet P., Chambon P. Rearrangement of chromatin structure induced by increasing ionic strength and temperature. Eur J Biochem. 1979 Oct;100(1):225–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb02053.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stalder J., Larsen A., Engel J. D., Dolan M., Groudine M., Weintraub H. Tissue-specific DNA cleavages in the globin chromatin domain introduced by DNAase I. Cell. 1980 Jun;20(2):451–460. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90631-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Strauss F., Prunell A. Nucleosome spacing in rat liver chromatin. A study with exonuclease III. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Apr 10;10(7):2275–2293. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.7.2275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun J. M., Ali Z., Lurz R., Ruiz-Carrillo A. Replacement of histone H1 by H5 in vivo does not change the nucleosome repeat length of chromatin but increases its stability. EMBO J. 1990 May;9(5):1651–1658. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08285.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sun Y. L., Xu Y. Z., Bellard M., Chambon P. Digestion of the chicken beta-globin gene chromatin with micrococcal nuclease reveals the presence of an altered nucleosomal array characterized by an atypical ladder of DNA fragments. EMBO J. 1986 Feb;5(2):293–300. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04212.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thoma F., Koller T., Klug A. Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin. J Cell Biol. 1979 Nov;83(2 Pt 1):403–427. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.2.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thomas J. O., Rees C., Pearson E. C. Histone H5 promotes the association of condensed chromatin fragments to give pseudo-higher-order structures. Eur J Biochem. 1985 Feb 15;147(1):143–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08730.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Villeponteau B., Landes G. M., Pankratz M. J., Martinson H. G. The chicken beta globin gene region. Delineation of transcription units and developmental regulation of interspersed DNA repeats. J Biol Chem. 1982 Sep 25;257(18):11015–11023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Weintraub H. Assembly and propagation of repressed and depressed chromosomal states. Cell. 1985 Oct;42(3):705–711. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90267-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weintraub H. Histone-H1-dependent chromatin superstructures and the suppression of gene activity. Cell. 1984 Aug;38(1):17–27. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90522-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weisbrod S., Groudine M., Weintraub H. Interaction of HMG 14 and 17 with actively transcribed genes. Cell. 1980 Jan;19(1):289–301. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90410-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Widom J. Physicochemical studies of the folding of the 100 A nucleosome filament into the 300 A filament. Cation dependence. J Mol Biol. 1986 Aug 5;190(3):411–424. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wood W. I., Felsenfeld G. Chromatin structure of the chicken beta-globin gene region. Sensitivity to DNase I, micrococcal nuclease, and DNase II. J Biol Chem. 1982 Jul 10;257(13):7730–7736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Woodcock C. L., Frado L. L., Rattner J. B. The higher-order structure of chromatin: evidence for a helical ribbon arrangement. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 1):42–52. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zaret K. S., Yamamoto K. R. Reversible and persistent changes in chromatin structure accompany activation of a glucocorticoid-dependent enhancer element. Cell. 1984 Aug;38(1):29–38. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90523-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES