Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biotechniques. 2012 Mar;52(3):183–190. doi: 10.2144/000113838

Table 1.

PCR-Based SNP Genotyping Assay Comparison

Estimated Reagent Cost and Throughput (per 96-well plate)
ARMS-PCR Small Amplicon Blocked Probe RFLP
Reagents ($)
Taq / dNTP 100 100 100 100
Primers / Probe 2 1 2 1
Analysis 2 10 10 22
Total Cost 104 111 112 123
Time (Minutes)
PCR Setup 30 30 30 30
Cycling 90 75 75 90
Handling 30 0 0 45
Endonuclease 0 0 0 60
Electrophoresis 60 0 0 60
Analysis 15 15 15 15
Total Time 225 120 120 300
Bbaa2 Genotyping (26 positions, 96-well plates, run back-to-back)
ARMS-PCR Small Amplicon Blocked Probe RFLP
9 Unknowns + 3 Control Samples
Total Cost ($) 340 360 365 400
Total Time (Hrs) 15 8 8 20
21 Unknowns + 3 Control Samples
Total Cost ($) 675 720 730 800
Total Time (Hrs) 27 14 14 35
Assay Design / Utility
ARMS-PCR Small Amplicon Blocked Probe RFLP
Success Rate 10% (1/10) 81% (9/11) 75% (12/16) Not Tested
Interpretation Unequivocal Subjective* Unequivocal Unequivocal
*

An objective genotype assignment can be made by spiking unclear samples with control DNA and repeating the HRMA