Abstract
The life cycle of an organism is one of its most elemental features, underpinning a broad range of phenomena including developmental processes, reproductive fitness, mode of dispersal and adaptation to the local environment. Life cycle modification may have played an important role during the evolution of several eukaryotic groups, including the terrestrial plants. Brown algae are potentially interesting models to study life cycle evolution because this group exhibits a broad range of different life cycles. Currently, life cycle studies are focused on the emerging brown algal model Ectocarpus. Two life cycle mutants have been described in this species, both of which cause the sporophyte generation to exhibit gametophyte characteristics. The ouroboros mutation is particularly interesting because it induces complete conversion of the sporophyte generation into a functional, gamete-producing gametophyte, a class of mutation that has not been described so far in other systems. Analysis of Ectocarpus life cycle mutants is providing insights into several life-cycle-related processes including parthenogenesis, symmetric/asymmetric initial cell divisions and sex determination.
Keywords: brown algae, gametophyte, homeotic mutation, initial cell polarisation, life cycle, multicellularity, parthenogenesis, Phaeophyceae, sporophyte
Multicellular organisms from diverse groups across the eukaryotic tree exhibit a variety of life cycles, differing essentially in the relative importance of the diploid and haploid phase.1 For most animal species the diploid phase of the life cycle is the only multicellular stage, whereas flowering plants exhibit an alternation between two multicellular generations, the macroscopic, diploid sporophyte and the microscopic, haploid gametophyte. Modifications to life cycle structures may have played an important adaptive role during the evolution of some major eukaryotic groups. In the green lineage, for example, there appears to have been a gradual tendency toward increasing dominance of the diploid generation as plants adapted to the terrestrial environment. As a result, the gametophyte generation in angiosperms (i.e., the pollen grain or the embryo sac) has been reduced to a structure consisting of just a few cells.
Despite the importance of life cycles, from both an evolutionary and a developmental perspective, little is known about how life cycle transitions are regulated at the molecular level. Brown algae are a particularly interesting group for the study of life cycle regulation and evolution because they exhibit a broad range of different cycles, ranging from isomorphic, haploid-diploid (with two morphologically identical generations) to diploid (with only one multicellular generation). In addition, brown algal life cycles are often quite complex, sometimes including several variant pathways. The filamentous brown alga Ectocarpus has a haploid-diploid life cycle that involves alternation between two morphologically similar generations but a number of variations on this basic cycle are possible. For example, gametes that fail to fuse with a gamete of the opposite sex can germinate parthenogenetically to produce haploid partheno-sporophytes.2,3 Such variant life cycles provide valuable information about the influence of factors such as ploidy and meiosis/fertilization on life cycle transitions.
Another, more direct, approach to elucidate the mechanisms that control life cycle progression is to screen for mutant individuals in which these processes are modified. This type of screen has been performed with Ectocarpus and two life cycle mutants have been described so far. The first mutation, immediate upright (imm), causes partial conversion of the sporophyte generation into a gametophyte.4 The imm sporophyte exhibits several morphological features typical of the gametophyte, but nonetheless produces spores and not gametes. The more recently described ouroboros (oro) mutation causes conversion of the the sporophyte into a full-functional, gamete-producing gametophyte.5 In crosses, imm and oro behaved as two independent, single locus, recessive Mendelian factors.5 Microarray analyses of changes in mRNA abundances in the imm and oro mutants compared with wild type samples suggested that both loci act as master regulators, influencing the expression of a large number of downstream genes. This is a typical characteristic of homeotic genes and, in this respect, it is interesting to note that oro can be considered to belong to a novel class of homeotic gene, causing homeotic conversion at the level of the entire bodyplan rather than effecting just one organ or tissue.
Characterization of the imm and oro mutations is expected to provide insights into several aspects of life cycle regulation. For example, gametes from Ectocarpus strains carrying the oro mutation germinate parthenogentically to give partheno-gametophytes rather than partheno-sporophytes. As the former is the wild type situation in several other species of brown algae, such as Myriotrichia clavaeformis for example,6 it will be interesting to determine whether variability with respect to this character in different brown algal species is linked to variability at the ORO locus.
Life cycle mutants have also been used to investigate the relationship between early development and life cycle progression. The two generations of the Ectocarpus life cycle exhibit radically different patterns of early development.4 The initial cell of the gametophyte (a meio-spore) undergoes an asymmetric division to produce a rhizoid and an upright filament, whereas the sporophyte initial cell (a zygote) divides symmetrically to produce a basal filament that is strongly attached to the substratum, upright filaments and rhizoids only being produced later in development. The phenotype of the imm mutant demonstrates that the pattern of initial cell division can be uncoupled from life cycle generation determination because functional sporophytes develop from an asymmetric initial cell division in this mutant.
The sex of Ectocarpus gametophytes is determined genetically by a single Mendelian locus. The oro mutation is not linked to the sex locus, so it was possible to produce both male and female strains carrying this mutation. Crosses between oro males and oro females resulted in diploid individuals that developed as gametophytes and produced diploid gametes.5 The diploid gametophytes produced by this cross provided additional evidence that the life cycle generation is not strictly determined by ploidy in Ectocarpus (as was already suggested by several observations, including the generation of haploid partheno-sporophytes from parthenogenic gamete germination, mentioned above). Sex determination in Ectocarpus is unusual in that sexuality is expressed during the haploid gametophyte generation as a result of the male and female haplotypes of the sex locus operating independently in male and female individuals. Interestingly, the oro homozygous, diploid gametophytes produced by the above cross were males, indicating that the male haplotype of the sex locus is dominant over the female haplotype when they occur in the same sexual individual.5
Global analysis of gene expression in wild type strains and life cycle mutants allowed the identification of a large collection of genes whose transcripts accumulated to significantly different levels on the sporophyte and the gametophyte.5 Analysis of the predicted functions of these genes indicated a tendency for genes associated with primary metabolism (including carbohydrate and lipid metabolism) and related functions such as transport to be over-represented among the transcripts that accumulated to higher levels in the sporophyte, whereas genes associated with protein synthesis and modification and other basic cellular processes, such as cell cycle and DNA replication, were over-represented among the transcripts that accumulated to higher levels in the gametophyte, suggesting that there may be marked physiological differences between the two generations of the life cycle. This observation is consistent with one of the ideas that has been put forward to explain the stability of haploid-diploid life cycles over long timescales - that the two generations of the life cycle may be adapted to different ecological niches, allowing survival in a changing environment.1,7 There is some evidence that the two generations of E. crouaniorum may be adapted to different environmental conditions.8 The small sporophyte of this species, which grows on stones or shells, is present all year round, whereas the larger gametophyte is found only in the spring, suggesting that the sporophyte generation might be adapted to more extreme physical conditions whereas the role of the gametophyte would be to grow rapidly under favorable growth conditions. More information about the niches of individual generations of different Ectocarpus species in the wild is necessary to further investigate the ecological role of each life cycle generation in these organisms.
From a developmental point of view, the phenotypes of the imm and oro mutants could be due either to failure to initiate the sporophyte pathway or failure to repress the gametophyte pathway. Microarray analysis provided evidence that the transition from the sporophyte to the gametophyte generation involved predominantly gene repression,5 suggesting that the principal function of the imm and oro genes may be to repress the gametophyte developmental pathway. If this is the case, then the sporophyte developmental program could be considered to be the default pathway. This may have implications for evolutionary modifications of life cycles in the brown algae.
Current work aimed at identifying the genes affected by the imm and oro mutations by positional cloning should not only begin to elucidate the molecular mechanisms that regulate life cycle progression in Ectocarpus but should also shed light on other fundamentally important processes such as early development and parthenogenesis. Importantly, a growing number of genetic and genomic tools are being made available for Ectocarpus,9-13 including the complete genome sequence.14 The availability of these tools will increasingly facilitate the use of this emerging model organism to study many aspects of brown algal biology15 including life cycle regulation.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, the University Pierre and Marie Curie, the Groupement d'Interet Scientifique Génomique Marine, the Interreg program France (Channel)-England (project Marinexus) and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (project Bi-cycle). AA was supported by a fellowship from the European Erasmus Mundus program.
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/psb/article/17737
References
- 1.Coelho SM, Peters A, Charrier B, Roze D, Destombe C, Valero M, et al. Complex life cycles of multicellular eukaryotes: new approaches based on the use of model organisms. Gene. 2007;406:152–70. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bothwell JH, Marie D, Peters AF, Cock JM, Coelho SM. Role of endoreduplication and apomeiosis during parthenogenetic reproduction in the model brown alga Ectocarpus. New Phytol. 2010;188:111–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Müller DG. Generationswechsel, Kernphasenwechsel und Sexualität der Braunalge Ectocarpus siliculosus im Kulturversuch. Planta. 1967;75:39–54. doi: 10.1007/BF00380838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peters AF, Scornet D, Ratin M, Charrier B, Monnier A, Merrien Y, et al. Life-cycle-generation-specific developmental processes are modified in the immediate upright mutant of the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus. Development. 2008;135:1503–12. doi: 10.1242/dev.016303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Coelho SM, Godfroy O, Arun A, Le Corguillé G, Peters AF, Cock JM. OUROBOROS is a master regulator of the gametophyte to sporophyte life cycle transition in the brown alga Ectocarpus Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Peters AF, Marie D, Scornet D, Kloareg B, Cock JM. Proposal of Ectocarpus siliculosus (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae) as a model organism for brown algal genetics and genomics. J Phycol. 2004;40:1079–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2004.04058.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mable B, Otto S. The evolution of life cycles with haploid and diploid phases. Bioessays. 1998;20:453–62. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199806)20:6<453::AID-BIES3>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Peters AF, van Wijk SJ, Cho GY, Scornet D, Hanyuda T, Kawai H, et al. Reinstatement of E. crouaniorum Thuret in Le Jolis as a third common species of Ectocarpus (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae) in western Europe, and its phenology at Roscoff, Brittany. Phycol Res. 2010;58:157–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1835.2010.00574.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Heesch S, Cho GY, Peters AF, Le Corguillé G, Falentin C, Boutet G, et al. A sequence-tagged genetic map for the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus provides large-scale assembly of the genome sequence. New Phytol. 2010;188:42–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dittami SM, Scornet D, Petit JL, Ségurens B, Da Silva C, Corre E, et al. Global expression analysis of the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus (Phaeophyceae) reveals large-scale reprogramming of the transcriptome in response to abiotic stress. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R66. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-r66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Le Bail A, Dittami SM, de Franco PO, Rousvoal S, Cock JM, Tonon T, et al. Normalisation genes for expression analyses in the brown alga model Ectocarpus siliculosus. BMC Mol Biol. 2008;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gschloessl B, Guermeur Y, Cock J. HECTAR: a method to predict subcellular targeting in heterokonts. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:393. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ritter A, Ubertini M, Romac S, Gaillard F, Delage L, Mann A, et al. Copper stress proteomics highlights local adaptation of two strains of the model brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus. Proteomics. 2010;10:2074–88. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cock JM, Sterck L, Rouzé P, Scornet D, Allen AE, Amoutzias G, et al. The Ectocarpus genome and the independent evolution of multicellularity in brown algae. Nature. 2010;465:617–21. doi: 10.1038/nature09016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Charrier B, Coelho SM, Le Bail A, Tonon T, Michel G, Potin P, et al. Development and physiology of the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus: two centuries of research. New Phytol. 2008;177:319–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]