Abstract
Berkeley Pit Lake, Butte, Montana is a 540 m. deep abandoned open-pit copper mine filled with over 140 billion liters of acidic, metal-sulfate contaminated water. This harsh environment has yielded several microorganisms that produce interesting biologically active compounds. Several polyketide metabolites including the new berkazaphilones A (1) and B (2) and octadienoic acid derivatives berkedienoic acid (13) and berkedienolactone (15), as well as previously reported azaphilone 4, vermistatin (6), dihydrovermistatin (7), penisimplicissin (8), aldehyde 9 and methyl paraconic acid (11) were isolated from a culture broth of Penicillium rubrum taken from a depth of 270 m. The structures of these compounds were deduced by interpretation of spectroscopic data. The compounds were isolated either for their inhibition of the signal transduction enzyme caspase-1 or because of their structural similarity to these inhibitors. Selected compounds were further evaluated for their ability to inhibit interleukin-1β production by inflammasomes in induced THP-1 cells. Berkazaphilone B (2) and C (4) and vermistatin analogue penisimplicissin (8) exhibited selective activity against leukemia cancer cell lines in the National Cancer Institute 60 human cell line assay.
The Berkeley Pit Lake System is one of the largest contaminated sites in North America. The Pit itself is over 540 m deep with a surface area of 3.2 km2 and is continually filling with metal-sulfate rich, acidic water (pH 2.5), at a rate of 10 million L/day. This represents roughly 140 billion L. of contaminated water and constitutes an important component of the largest EPA Superfund site in the United States.1
In 1995 we began to study the microbes inhabiting the waters of this Pit Lake as if they were inhabitants of a new and exotic ecosystem. Over the past fifteen years we have studied the secondary metabolism of several microbes isolated from the water and sediments of this ecosystem under a variety of physicochemical conditions to determine whether or not they produce metabolites with desirable bioactivity. This approach has yielded interesting results.2–8
Bioactivity is currently assessed using 96-well plate assays that demonstrate the ability of crude extracts, column fractions, and pure compounds to inhibit specific signal transduction enzymes. We routinely target the enzymes matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), caspase-1 and caspase-3. These assays are proving to be effective tools for assessing the bioactivities of crude extracts and guiding isolation of pure enzyme inhibitors. The lead compounds presented in this manuscript were isolated because of their ability to inhibit caspase-1. After the structures of these compounds were elucidated, compounds with similar 1H NMR spectral characteristics were also isolated to ascertain how subtle differences in structure might affect biological activity.
Caspase-1 was the first of a novel type of cysteine protease responsible for converting interleukin-1β to its mature form in monocytes. Caspase-1, also known as interleukin-1 converting enzyme (ICE), is responsible for the activation of IL-1β and IL-18 from precursor molecules.9 Caspase-1 is activated upon binding to the inflammasome, a multiprotein complex that plays a key role in innate immunity by activating the proinflammatory pleiotropic cytokines interleukin 1-β and IL-18.9 There is a strong correlation between dysregulated inflammasome activity and both inherited and acquired inflammatory diseases.9
Several researchers have demonstrated that caspase-1 inhibitors have shown promise in delaying the onset of Huntington's disease10 and amyotropic lateral sclerosis,11 and in mitigating the effects of stroke12 and multiple sclerosis.13, 14 All of these diseases exhibit autoimmune phenomena. Capsase-1 has also been implicated in the physiological production of interferon-gamma-inducing factor (IGIF). It therefore appears to play a critical role in the regulation of multiple proinflammatory cytokines.15
The up-regulation of caspase-1 and concomitant chronic inflammation has been associated with a number of different pathologies including the development of insulin resistance in obesity related diabetes,16 degeneration of retinal capillaries associated with diabetes and galactosemia,17 the demyelination of neurons in multiple sclerosis,11,18 and the formation of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease.19 High levels of caspase-1 and interleukin-1β have been found in certain cancers20 by many different researchers: acute myelogenous leukemia,21 melanoma,22–23 certain glioblastomas24–25 and pancreatic cancers,26–29 certain breast cancers,30 and human cancer xenografts31 all of which may be exacerbated by chronic inflammation associated with activation of the inflammasome.
Caspase-1 inhibitors have been proposed as potential therapies for the above mentioned cancers, as well as osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis,32–33 Alzheimer's disease,19 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis9 and brain and nerve trauma.34–35
Caspase-1 is also down-regulated in many solid tumor cancers and activation of caspase-1 in prostate cancer and ovarian cancer may be required for apoptotic breakdown of tumors. The development of new caspase-1 inhibitors will not only provide potential chemotherapeutics but will also provide tools for the investigation of the intricacies of signal transduction.
One of the first microbes to be studied from the Pit Lake was isolated from a depth of 270 m. and was subsequently identified as Penicillium rubrum Stoll based on rRNA sequencing alignment data (300 base pairs). The fungus was grown in acidified potato dextrose broth (pH 2.7) for 21 days as a still culture. At time of harvest the mycelium was removed by filtration and the broth was thoroughly extracted with chloroform. This organic extract was active in all three enzyme inhibition assays, although in this study we focused on the caspase-1 inhibitors. Size exclusion chromatography (LH-20) followed by HPLC yielded the new berkazaphilones A and B (1) and (2) as well as the new octadienoic acid derivatives berkedienoic acid (13) and berkedienolactone (15), and the previously reported azaphilone (4), vermistatin (6), dihydrovermistatin (7), penisimplicissin (8), aldehyde 9 and methyl paraconic acid 11.
HREIMS of 1 gave a molecular formula of C13H16O3, corresponding to a molecule with six sites of unsaturation. The 13C NMR spectrum showed seven sp2 hybridized carbons in the molecule, suggesting the presence of three double bonds and one carbonyl carbon. A bicyclic ring system accommodated the two remaining sites of unsaturation. The UV spectrum (λmax 344 nm) indicated extended conjugation and the IR spectrum showed the presence of a dienone moiety (νmax 1644 cm−1)36 that was supported by a carbon resonating at δC 198.2 ppm in the 13C NMR spectrum. The DEPT spectrum showed that fifteen protons were attached to carbons. The strong OH- stretch in the IR spectrum (νmax 3415 cm−1) provided sufficient information to assign the remaining proton to the hydroxy group. The 1H NMR (Table 1) and 1H-1H COSY spectra indicated the presence of two spin systems: CH3-CH-CHO-CH-CH2O and a terminal CH=CH-CH3, as well as two olefinic protons at δH 5.71 (d, J = 1.9 Hz) and δH 5.49 (s). The HMBC spectrum provided correlations to connect the first spin system to ketone C-6 (δC 198.2). Mutually 3J-coupled methine H-7 (δH 2.41, J = 10.3, 6.6) and methyl doublet H3-12 (δH 1.25, J =6.6) showed strong HMBC correlations to carbonyl C-6 and to oxygen-bearing C-8 (δC 74.2 ppm). H3-12 also showed correlations to methine C-7 (δ 50.0 ppm). 1H-1H COSY showed 3J- ppm coupling between H-7 and H-8 (δH 3.43, J = 10.3), between H-8 and methine H-8a (δH 2.84, J = 10.3), and between H-8a and oxygen-bearing methylene H-1 (1α = δH 3.72, J = 13.2; 1β = δH 4.79, J = 5.4). Methylene H-1β could be connected to the conjugated diene system through 3-bond HMBC correlations to oxygen-bearing C-3 (δC 159.9) and C-4a (δC 150.5). HMBC correlations from olefinic H-4 (δH 5.49) to C-5 (δC 118.1) established the diene backbone, and from H-4 to C-9 (δC 125.4) connected the diene system to the terminal propylene moiety. H-4 also showed a HMBC correlation to C-8a (δC 40.9), which allowed the α,β,γ,δ-unsaturated ketone bicyclic ring system to be established. The configuration of the propylene olefin could be established as E based on the magnitude of the 15.7 Hz coupling between H-9 and H-10.
Table 1.
1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
atom | δC, type | δH, mult. (J in Hz) | δC, type | δH mult. (J in Hz) | δC, type | δH mult. (J in Hz) |
1 | 68.6, CH2 | β 4.79, dd (10.9, 5.4) α 3.72, dd (13.2, 10.9) |
68.4, CH2 | β 4.82, dd (11.1,5.3) α 3.78, dd (13.5, 11.1) |
67.9, CH2 | β 4.38, dd (10.8, 5.4) α 3.85, dd (13.0, 10.8) |
3 | 159.9, C | 160.8, C | 160.7, C | |||
4 | 102.8, CH | 5.49, s | 102.4, CH | 5.51, s | 102.8, CH | 5.56, s |
4a | 150.5, C | 152.5, C | 151.7, C | |||
5 | 118.1, CH | 5.71, d (1.9) | 115.4, CH | 5.78, d (1.6) | 115.7, CH | 5.79, d (1.7) |
6 | 198.2, C | 190.5, C | 194.8, C | |||
7 | 50.0, CH | 2.41, dq (10.3, 6.6) | 89.3, C | 74.1, C | ||
8 | 74.2, CH | 3.43, bt (10.3) | 74.6, CH | 3.58, bt (10.1) | 74.7, CH | 5.29, d (9.9) |
8a | 40.9, CH | 2.84, dddd (13.2, 10.3, 5.4, 1.9) | 37.8, CH | 2.82, dddd (13.5, 10.1, 5.3, 1.6) | 34.9, CH | 3.44, dddd (13.0, 9.9, 5.4, 1.7) |
9 | 125.4, CH | 5.87, dq (15.7, 1.7) | 125.2, CH | 5.85, dd (15.3,1.5) | 125.2, CH | 5.87, dd (15.4, 1.7) |
10 | 133.2, CH | 6.40, dq (15.7, 6.8) | 134.4, CH | 6.45, dq (15.3,6.9) | 134.5, CH | 6.41, dd (15.4, 7.0) |
11 | 18.4, CH3 | 1.84, dd (6.8, 1.7) | 18.4, CH3 | 1.84, dd (6.9,1.5) | 18.5, CH3 | 1.84, dd, (7.0, 1.7) |
12 | 10.8, CH3 | 1.25, d (3H, 6.6) | 15.4, CH3 | 1.77, s (3H) | 20.4, CH3 | 1.38, s (3H) |
1′ | 172.0, C | 170.6, C | ||||
2′ | 104.7, C | 104.4, C | ||||
3′ | 166.0, C | 165.9, C | ||||
4′ | 101.5, CH | 6.25, d (2.4) | 101.6, CH | 6.30, d (2.3) | ||
5′ | 161.4, C | 161.1, C | ||||
6′ | 112.1, CH | 6.18, d (2.4) | 112.0, CH | 6.27, d (2.3) | ||
7′ | 145.0, C | 144.6, C | ||||
8′ | 24.7 q | 2.28, s (3H) | 25.0, CH3 | 2.58, s (3H) |
Assignments of the 13C and 1H signals were made based on HSQC spectral data.
The relative stereochemistry of 1 was established by interpretation of 1H NMR and 1D NOE difference spectra. The broad triplet H-8 showed ax/ax coupling (J = 10.3 Hz) to both H-7 and H-8a, which also exhibited strong ax/ax coupling (J = 13.2 Hz) to H-1α. In the NOE difference spectrum irradiation of H-8a enhanced the resonance of H-1β, supporting the relative stereochemistry assignment as shown. These data were used to generate the proposed structure for berkazaphilone A (1).
Compound 1 belongs to the class of fungal metabolites known as the azaphilones. A comprehensive review of azaphilone analogues in 2010 listed over 170 compounds from 23 different fungal genera.37 Most of the known azaphilones are oxygenated at both C-7 and C-8 and often form orsellinic or chlorinated orsellinic acid esters. Of the azaphilone analogues reviewed, only one other compound, pseudohalonectrin, was not oxygenated at C-7.37
HREIMS established the molecular formula of compound 2 as C21H22O7 which showed compound 2 to have eight more carbons than 1 and five additional sites of unsaturation, indicative of an aromatic moiety. There were many similarities between the 13C and 1H NMR spectra of compounds 1 and 2 (Table 1). Two obvious differences were due to the replacement of the C-7 methine in compound 1 by a quaternary oxygen-bearing carbon (δC 89.3), leading to the replacement of the H3-12 doublet of 1 with a singlet in compound 2 (δH 1.77). These data suggested that 2 had the same carbon skeleton as 1 with a substituent at C-7. HMBC and 1H NMR spectral data provided the necessary information to support this deduction. A terminal E- configured propylene moiety, olefinic singlet H-4 (δH 5.51) and doublet H-5 (δH 5.78 ppm) were present as in 1. 3J-coupling data again showed ax/ax interactions between H-8 and H-8a (J = 10.1 Hz) and between H-8a and H-1α (J = 13.5 Hz), and ax/eq interaction between H-8a and H-1β (J = 5.3). Singlet H3-12 showed 3-bond correlations to ketone C-6 (δC 190.5) and methine C-8 (δC 74.6 ppm), as well as 2-bond coupling to quaternary C-7. H-1β showed a 2-bond correlation to C-8a (δC 37.8) and 3-bond correlations to C-3 (δC 160.8) and C-4a (δC 152.5 ppm). Olefinic H-4 had 3-bond correlations to C-8a and C-5 (δC 115.4) again establishing the bicyclic diene, and to C-9 (δC 125.2), connecting the ring system to the terminal propylene moiety. H-4 also showed 2-bond correlations to C-3 and C-4a. H-5 (δH 5.78) showed 3-bond correlations to C-4 (δC 102.4) and to C-7, supporting the location of the oxy-substituent at C-7.
Eight carbons, seven hydrogens, three oxygens and five sites of unsaturation remained to be assigned and attached to the oxygen at C-7. A carbon resonating at δC 172.0 (C-1′) and an IR absorbance of 1708 cm−1 showed the presence of an aromatic ester. The DEPT and 13C spectra showed the presence of five quaternary carbons, including the carbonyl carbon, two methines and a methyl carbon. Chemical shifts indicated that all but the methyl were sp2-hybridized, consistent with an aromatic ester, and that two carbons were oxygen-bearing. HMBC data showed 2-bond correlations from H-4′ (δH 6.25, J = 2.4 Hz) to both oxygen bearing C-3′ (δC 166.0) and C-5′ (δC 161.4). H-6′ (δH 6.18, J = 2.4 Hz) showed a 3-bond correlation to methyl C-8′ (δC 24.7), and H3-8′ (δH 2.28) showed 3-bond correlations to both C-6′ (δC 101.5) and C-2′ (δC 104.7). These data established the substituent as an orsellinic acid moiety and were consistent with literature data.38
Acetylation of compound 2 resulted in triacetate 3. The orsellinic acid moiety was diacetylated as expected and chemical shift data was consistent with the literature.39 Acetylation of the hydroxyl group at C-8 induced a large downfield shift of H-8 from q 3.58 to δ5.00 (d, J= 9.9 Hz) and a downfield shift of H-8a from δH 2.82 to δ 3.34 ppm. H-8 was 3J-coupled to H-8a and showed HMBC correlations to C-8a, C-1, C-7 and to an acetate carbonyl. These data confirmed the structure proposed for compound 2, berkazaphilone B, with the placement of the orsellinic moiety at C-7.
Compound 4 was isomeric with 2, with a molecular formula of C21H22O7 established by HREIMS. The 13C NMR spectra of 2 and 4 were very similar (see Table 1) but the 1H NMR spectrum had two distinct differences. Methylene proton H-1β showed a marked upfield shift and methine H-8 showed a marked downfield shift in compound 4 when compared to 2. These differences indicated that the orsellinic acid moiety was at C-8 rather than C-7. HMBC correlations were observed from H-8 (δH 5.29) to C-1′ (δC 170.6), confirming this deduction. Acetylation of 4 gave the expected diacetate 5. The proposed compound has been previously reported and the NMR and mass spectral data of compound 4, berkazaphilone C, compared favorably to the data reported for azaphilone Sch 725680.38 Unfortunately, the original authors did not provide the optical rotation for their compound so we cannot be sure if the two are the same stereoisomer.38
Examination of mass spectral, NMR and optical rotation data indicated that the major cytotoxic compound in the extract was the known fungal metabolite vermistatin (6), which was previously reported as a metabolite of Penicillium vermiculatum.40 The NMR data of compounds 7 and 8 were similar to that of vermistatin, indicating strong structural similarities. The HREIMS of compound 7 gave a molecular formula of C18H18O6, with two more hydrogens than vermistatin. Indeed, the only major difference between the NMR spectra of vermistatin 6 and compound 7 were the peaks associated with the terminal propylene moiety. It was apparent from the NMR data that it was reduced to a n-propyl moiety, designating 7 as 14,15-dihydrovermistatin. Dihydrovermistatin was previously reported from broth cultures of Penicillium simplicissimum.41
The third vermistatin analogue, compound 8, had a molecular formula of C16H14O6, with two less carbons than either vermistatin (6) or dihydrovermistatin (7). In this case, the 1H NMR signals of both the terminal propylene and propyl moiety were absent and were replaced by a methyl singlet at δ 2.44. This compound was previously reported as penisimplicissin from broth cultures of Penicillium simplicissimum.41 Compounds 7 and 8 had the same sign and relative optical rotations as vermistatin (6), suggesting that they had the same configuration.40
The molecular formula of compound 9 was C13H16O5 as determined from HREIMS. 13C NMR and DEPT spectra indicated the presence of two carbonyl carbons: ketone C-8 at δC 208.8 (C) and aldehyde C-12 at δC 195.1 (CH). Six additional sp2 hybridized carbons indicated the presence of an aromatic moiety with two oxygen-bearing carbons resonating at δC 165.2 and δC 164.6 ppm. These assignments accommodated all six sites of unsaturation associated with the molecular formula. Examination of the spectral data established the structure of compound 9 as shown, which was previously reported as a metabolite of Aspergillus versicolor.42 We prepared the Mosher ester of 9 and found the same absolute configuration (R) as reported.43 The (S) stereoisomer of compound 9 has also been reported from a Pseudobotrytis sp.44
EIMS established the molecular formula of compound 11 as C6H8O4, associated with three sites of unsaturation. Its infrared spectrum indicated the presence of two carbonyl moieties: the broad –OH stretch (νmax 3027 cm−1) and carbonyl absorption at 1716 cm−1 indicated the presence of a saturated carboxylic acid, while the carbonyl absorption at 1774 cm−1 indicated the presence of a saturated γ-butyrolactone.45 The presence of the acid was confirmed by methylation of compound 11 with diazomethane to yield the methyl ester, 12. Analysis of the spectral data established the structure of 11, which is the known compound α-methyl paraconic acid.46
Compound 13 had a molecular formula of C11H16O3 established by the HRESIMS spectrum, with four sites of unsaturation. The broad –OH stretch (νmax = 3021 cm−1) and the carbonyl absorption at 1683 cm−1 in the infrared spectrum were indicative of an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid. Methylation of 13 with diazomethane yielded the methyl ester 14 which had a molecular formula of C12H19O3, as determined by HREIMS.
The 1H-1H COSY spectrum of 13 provided connectivity data for two spin systems beginning with a terminal diene. The 3J-coupling of the diene protons clearly correlated H-8a (δH 5.20) and H-8b (δH 5.08) to H-7 (δH 6.28), H-7 to H-6 (δH 6.20), H-6 to H-5 (δH 5.70), H-5 to oxygen-bearing methine H-4 (δH 4.31), and H-4 to methylene H2-3 (δH 2.57). The second spin system consisted of a terminal propylidene moiety with 3J-coupling from H-9 (δH 7.02) to methylene H2-10 (δH 2.23) and from H-10 to the terminal methyl H3-11 (δH 1.05). The HMBC spectrum provided the necessary information to connect these two spin systems to the carbonyl carbon with 3-bond correlations from H-9 and H2-3 to C-1. H-9 also exhibited correlations to C-3 and C-10. Methylene H2-3 provided a point of connectivity with 3-bond correlations to C-1, C-9 and C-5, and 2-bond correlations to flanking carbons C-2 and C-4. H-4 also afforded nice bilateral connectivity with 3-bond correlations to C-2 and C-6, and 2-bond correlations to C-3 and C-5. The chemical shift of H-9 indicated an E configuration for Δ2,9.47 The magnitude of the coupling constant between olefinic H-5 and H-6 (J = 14.3 Hz) also indicated an E configuration. These data generated the structure proposed for compound 13, berkedienoic acid.
Compound 15 had a molecular formula of C11H14O2 established by the HRESIMS [M+H]+ peak at m/z 179.1082. The carbonyl absorption at 1751 cm−1 and accompanying C=C absorption at 1679 cm−1 in the infrared spectrum indicated the presence of an αβ-unsaturated γ-lactone.45 These data and the similarities in the NMR spectra suggested that compound 15 was the γ-butyrolactone of compound 13. The 1H-1H COSY and the 1H NMR spectra provided connectivity data for a single extended spin system beginning with a terminal diene at one end. The 3J-coupling of the diene protons correlated H-8a (δH 5.28) and H-8b (δH 5.18) to H-7 (δH 6.30), H-7 to H-6 (δH 6.30), H-6 to H-5 (δH 5.69), H-5 to oxygen-bearing methine H-4 (δH 4.98), and H-4 to methylene H2-3 (δH 2.58, 3.05 ppm).
The terminal propylidene moiety produced 3J-coupling from methyl H3-11 (δH 1.07 ppm) to methylene H2-10 (δH 2.17), and from H2-10 to olefinic H-9 (δH 6.72). The coupling pattern for methylene H2-10, however, was quite complex; the expected pentet pattern was actually a pentet of triplets and the 1H-1H COSY spectrum showed connectivity to methylene H2-3, which required 5-bond coupling in our proposed structure. The coupling patterns for H2-3a and b were also complex and both were doublets of doublets of pentets. Bearing in mind that a pentet is actually a dddd with equivalent coupling constants, then these patterns become complex indeed. These data suggest that these unusually complex patterns are the result of allylic and homoallylic coupling. Studies on 2-butene and compounds containing a butenyl moiety showed similar correlations.48
Homoallylic coupling data from both the 1H NMR and the 1H-1H COSY spectra provided the information to connect the two ends of the molecule. The coupling patterns for this molecule were complex but could be deconstructed to include homoallylic coupling between the methylenes H2-10 and H2-3.
The exocyclic double bond could be established as the E- isomer by chemical shift arguments. A series of E and Z isomers of α-alkylidene-γ-butyrolactones were synthesized and the chemical shifts of the olefinic protons analogous to H-9 were compared.49 In all cases the chemical shift of H-9 in the Z-isomer approached δH 6.0 ppm while in the E-isomer it was closer to δH 6.6 ppm.49 These data were used to generate the structure proposed for compound 15, berkedienolactone. A series of similar lactones including the tricyclic compound gallielalactone were isolated from an unidentified ascomycete.50,51 Unfortunately, the reported monocyclic lactones most structurally similar to 15 were not isolated as pure compounds, so it was not possible to compare optical rotation data with that of berkedienolactone (15).
Compounds 1, 2, 4, and 6–9 were evaluated for their ability to inhibit caspase-1 in vitro, and the most active compounds and closely related analogues were evaluated for their ability to inhibit the production of interleukin 1-β in THP-1 cells (pro-monocytic leukemia cell line). THP-1 cells produce high levels of IL-1β when induced with titanium nanowires and bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Caspase-1 inhibition was determined in a fluorometric assay normalized to 1.00, where 0 is total enzyme inhibition and 1.00 is lack of enzyme inhibition. Both berkazaphilone B (2) and C (4) had IC100 values of 25 μM against caspase-1, while berkazaphilone A (1), penisimplicissin (8), and compound 9 were completely inhibitory at a concentration of 250 μM. Vermistatin (6) and dihydrovermistatin (7) were not inhibitory at the concentrations tested.
Induced THP-1 cells were exposed to compounds 2, 4, and 6–8, and the concentrations of IL-1β post-exposure were determined. All of the compounds tested inhibited the production of IL-1β in THP-1 cells at a concentration of 250 μM. In dilution assays, however, only compounds 2 and 4 inhibited the production of IL-1β. Compounds 2 and 4 completely inhibited the production of IL-1β at concentrations of 5 μM and 50 μM, respectively.
Compounds 2, 4, 7, and 8 were tested in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) antitumor screen against 60 human cell lines.52 The compounds showed selective cytotoxicity towards leukemia cell lines only. Berkazaphilone B (2) exhibited a log10 GI50 of −5.67 against cell line RPMI-8226 and berkazaphilone C (4) exhibited a log10 GI50 of −6.42 against cell line SR. In the vermistatin family, penisimplicissin (8) exhibited a log10 GI50 of −6.70 against cell line CCRFCEM and −5.83 against HL-60(TB), and dihydrovermistatin (7) was inactive at the concentrations tested. Vermistatin (6) had been previously tested by the NCI and was also inactive. (Supplemental information)
The NCI Molecular Target database includes experiments that determine relative RNA levels for nearly 10,000 human clones, measured in microarray experiments for the NCI cell lines. It was interesting to note that in several microarray experiments caspase-1 was upregulated almost exclusively in different leukemia cell lines.53–56
Experimental Section
General Experimental Procedures
1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were run on Bruker DPX-300. Chemical shifts were recorded with respect to the deuterated solvent shift (CDCl3, δ 7.24 for the proton resonance and δ 77.0 for the carbon). IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet NEXUS 670 FT-IR spectrometer. Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin Elmer 241 MC Polarimeter using a 1 mL cell. Mass spectral data were provided by the Mass Spectrometry, Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility at Montana State University and the Mass Spectral Analysis laboratory at the University of Montana. All solvents used were spectral grade or distilled prior to use.
Collection, Extraction, and Isolation Procedures
The collection and isolation of the Berkeley Pit fungi has previously been described.7, 8 The fungus was identified as Penicillium rubrum by Microbial Identification, Inc. The fungus was grown at room temperature in 26 × 300 mL of DIFCO® potato dextrose broth (acidified to pH 2.7 with sulfuric acid) in 1 L Erlenmeyer flasks (shaken at 180 rpm for 6 days then still for 15 days). At time of harvest 50 mL of MeOH was added/flask. The combined cultures (7.8 L) were filtered through cheesecloth to remove the mycelia mat for a separate study. The filtrate from the combined cultures was extracted three times with 1L of CHCl3 and the extract was reduced in vacuo to an oil (1.14 g). This extract demonstrated inhibition of caspase-1 and MMP-3, antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, and brine shrimp lethality.
The CHCl3 extract was fractionated using a flash Si gel column using hexanes, hexane/isopropyl alcohol mixtures to isopropyl alcohol /MeOH mixtures. The 50% IPA/hexane fraction was further fractionated by preparative HPLC on a Rainin 21 mm preparative Si gel column with a hexanes/isopropyl alcohol gradient. The 10% IPA fraction was further fractionated on Sigel to yield the three azaphilone derivatives 1 (5.1 mg), 2 (35.1 mg) and 4 (7.1 mg). The fraction that eluted with 50% IPA/hexane yielded the three cytotoxic compounds 6 (46.2 mg), 7 (4.0 mg), and 8 (18.0 mg). The 25% IPA/hexane fraction yielded aldehyde 9 (5.6 mg), lactone 11, berkedienoic acid 13 (1.5 mg) and berkedienolactone 14 (2.0 mg)
Berkazaphilone A (1): [α]20D +20.5° (c 0.0019, MeOH); UV (CHCl3) λmax (log ε) 344 (4.36), 241 (3.75) nm; IR (CHCl3) νmax 3415, 3020, 2934, 1644, 1592, 1384, 1063, 876 cm−1; 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3) see Table 1 ; EIMS m/z 220 (50), 162 (48), 134 (100); HREIMS m/z 220.1099 [M+] (calcd for C13H16O3, 220.1099).
Berkazaphilone B (2): [α]20D −55.2° (c 0.0025, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 349 (4.11), 270 (4.05) nm; IR (neat) λmax 3400, 2933, 1708, 1669, 1633, 1585, 1326, 1267, 1172, 1118 cm−1; 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3) see Table 1; EIMS m/z 386 (15), 236 (20), 218 (38), 175 (83), 162 (94), 134 (100), 69 (85); HREIMS m/z 386.1363, [M]+ (calcd for C21H22O7, 386.1365).
Acetylation of compound 2
Compound 2 (1.0 mg) was dissolved in pyridine (50 μL) and Ac2O (50 μL) and stirred for 24 hours. After that time the solvents were removed to give 3 as an oil (0.9 mg).
Compound 3: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 6.82 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6′), 6.77 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-4′), 6.38 (dq, J = 15.1, 6.9, H-10), 5.83 (dd, J = 15.1, 1.7 Hz, H-9), 5.82 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, H-5), 5.50 (s, H-4), 5.00 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, H-8), 4.26 (dd, J = 10.7, 5.1 Hz, H-1β), 3.71 (d, J = 13.2, 10.7 Hz, H-1α), 3.34 (dddd, J = 13.2, 9.9, 5.1, 1.6 Hz, H-8a), 2.33 (s, 3H, H-8′), 2.26 (s, 3H, OAc), 2.22 (s, 3H, OAc), 2.17 (s, 3H, OAc), 1.83 (dd, J = 6.9, 1.7 Hz, 3H, H-11), 1.61 (s, 3H, H-12); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 190.4 (C-6), 170.2 (OAc), 168.8 (OAc), 168.5 (OAc), 164.1 (C-1′), 159.9 (C-3), 151.8 (C-5′), 149.8 (C-4a), 148.6 (C-3′), 138.4 (C-7′), 133.4 (C-10), 125.1 (C-9), 124.1 (C-2′), 121.0 (C-6′), 116.4 (C-5), 114.1 (C-4′), 102.4 (C-4), 83.3 (C-7), 74.2 (C-8), 67.8 (C-1), 35.8 (C-8a), 21.1 (OAc), 20.8 (OAc), 20.6 (OAc), 19.8 (C-8′), 18.4 (C-11), 17.2 (C-12).
Berkazaphilone C (4): [α]25D +54.3° (c 0.0030 CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3) see Table 1; EIMS m/z 386; HREIMS m/z 386.1365 [M]+ (calcd for C21H22O7, 386.1365).
Acetylation of compound 4
Compound 4 (1.0 mg) was dissolved in pyridine (50μ L) and Ac2O (50 μL) and stirred for 24 hours. After that time the solvents were removed to give 5 as an oil (0.9 mg).
Compound 5: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 6.93 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, H-6′), 6.86 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, H-4′), 6.42 (dq, J = 15.2, 6.9 Hz, H-10), 5.88 (bd, J = 15.2, 1.5 Hz, H-9), 5.78 (bd, J = 1.9 Hz, H-5), 5.56 (s, H-4), 5.17 (d, J = 10.0, H-8), 4.51 (dd, J = 10.8, 5.4 Hz, H-1β), 3.85 (dd, J = 13.5, 10.8 Hz, H-1α), 3.34 (m, H-8a), 2.41 (s, 3H, H-8′), 2.29 (s, 6H, OAc), 1.85 (dd, J = 6.9, 1.5 Hz, 3H, H-11), 1.41 (s, 3H, H-12); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 193.9 (C-6), 168.9 (OAc), 168.6 (OAc), 165.4 (C-1′), 160.4 (C-3), 149.6 (C-3′), 151.1, (C-5′), 152.1 (C-4a), 139.9 (C-7′), 134.3 (C-10), 122.5 (C-2′), 121.6 (C-6′), 125.2 (C-9), 116.0 (C-5), 114.7 (C-4′), 102.8 (C-4), 74.6 (C-7), 74.2 (C-8), 67.9 (C-1), 34.9 (C-8a), 21.1 (OAc, 2C), 21.1 (C-8′), 20.2 (C-12), 18.4 (C-11).
Berkedienoic acid (13): solid, IR (CHCl3) νmax 3021 (broad), 2971, 2877, 1683, 1637, 1419, 1004 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.02 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-9), 6.28 (1H, ddd, J = 16.1, 10.4, 9.6 Hz, H-7), 6.20 (1H, dd, J = 14.3, 10.4 Hz, H-6), 5.70 (1H, dd, J = 14.3, 6.4 Hz, H-5), 5.20 (1 H, dd, J = 16.1, 1.4 Hz, H-8), 5.08 (1H, dd, J = 9.6, 1.4 Hz, H-8), 4.31 (1H, q, J = 6.4 Hz, H-4), 2.57 (2H, m, H-3), 2.23 (2H, quin, J = 7.5 Hz, H-10), 1.05 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 172.7 (C, C-1), 149.9 (CH, C-9), 136.2 (CH, C-7), 135.5 (CH, C-5), 131.0 (CH, C-6), 126.8 (C, C-2), 117.8 (CH2, C-8), 71.8 (CH, C-4), 34.3 (CH2, C-3), 22.6 (CH2, C-10), 13.0 (CH3, C-11); HRESIMS [M – H2O + H]+ m/z 179.1076 (calcd for C11H15O2, 179.1072).
Methylation of 13: Compound 13, (0.2 mg) was dissolved in Et2O (100 μL) and a solution of CH2N2 in Et2O was added drop wise until the yellow color persisted. The solution was stirred for 5 minutes and the solvent removed under a stream of N2 to yield the methyl ester 14 (0.2 mg). HREIMS m/z [M+H]+ m/z 211.1325 (calcd for C12H19O3, 211.1334. (calcd for C11H16O3).
Berkedienolactone (15): solid, [α]25D −37.0° (c 0.0020, MeOH); IR (CHCl3) νmax 3023, 2971, 2877, 1751, 1679, 1301, 1016 cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 6.72 (1H, tt, J = 7.5, 2.8 Hz, H-9), 6.30 (2 H, m, H-7, H-6), 5.69 (1H, dd, J = 14.3, 6.7 Hz, H-5), 5.28 (1H, dd, J = 15.1, 1.38 Hz, H-8), 5.18 (1H, dd, J = 9.5, 1.38 Hz, H-8), 4.98 (1H, ddd, J = 8.1, 7.6, 6.2 Hz, H-4), 3.05 (1H, dddd, J = 16.3, 8.1, 2.8, 1.4 Hz, H-3), 2.58 (1H, ddpentet, J = 16.3, 6.2, 1.5 Hz, H-3), 2.17 (2H, m, H-10), 1.07 (3H, t, J =7.5 Hz, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 170.7 (C, C-1), 142.5 (CH, C-9), 135.4 (CH, C-6), 133.3 (CH, C-7), 131.0 (CH, C-5), 125.1 (C, C-2), 75.7 (CH, C-4), 119.6 (CH2, C-8), 31.8 (CH , C-3), 23.6 (CH2, C-10), 12.6 (CH3, C-11); HRESIMS [M + H] m/z 179.1082 (calcd for C11H15O2, 179.1072).
In Vitro THP-1 Assay
Human monocyte cell line THP-1 was purchased from ATCC (#TIB-202). The cells were suspended at (2–4) × 105 viable cells/mL in RPMI media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, sodium pyruvate, and an antimycotic/antibiotic cocktail containing penicillin, streptomycin and amphotericin B (Mediatech,VWR). The cells were differentiated into macrophage-like cells by the phorbol ester, PMA (1 μg/mL, Sigma), 24 hour prior to experimentation. The transformed cells were removed from the flask by scraping, and centrifuged at 450 g for 5 min. The resulting cell pellet was suspended at 1.0 × 106 cells/mL and exposed to caspase-1 inhibitors at concentrations described below (0.5%–0.005%), LPS [20ng/mL] and TiO2 nanowires (100 μg/mL). Experiments were conducted in 96-well plates for 24 h in 37 °C water-jacketed CO2 incubators (ThermoForma).
Toxicity Assay
Cell viability was determined by MTS reagent using the CellTiter96 assay (Promega), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The plate was read at 490 nm.
Cytokine Assays
Human IL-1β DuoSet was obtained from R&D Systems and ELISA assays performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. The plate was read at 490 nm.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Ms. B. Parker (University of Montana) for HRMS data and our colleagues from the Department of Chemistry, Montana State University: Dr. Scott Busse for assistance with NMR spectroscopy and Dr. L. Joseph Sears for mass spectral data. We thank the National Science Foundation grant # 9506620 for providing funding for NMR upgrades at the MSU facility and grant #CHE-9977213 for acquisition of a NMR spectrometer. We gratefully acknowledge NIH grants R01CA139159, P20RR16455-04 and P20RR017670 (NCRR); 5P30NS055022; and RC2ES018742.
Dedicated to Dr. Gordon M. Cragg, formerly Chief, Natural Products Branch, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, for his pioneering work on the development of natural product anticancer agents
Footnotes
Supporting Information. 1H NMR, 13C NMR, COSY and HMBC spectra of berkazaphilone A (1); 1H NMR, 13C NMR, COSY and HMBC of berkazaphilone B (2); 1H NMR and 13C NMR of berkazaphilone C (4); 1H NMR, 13C NMR, COSY and HMBC of berkedienoic acid (13); 1H NMR, 13C NMR, COSY and HMBC of berkedienolactone (15) and NCI cell line data for compounds 2, 4 and 8 are available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- (1).Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology [accessed 5/16/11];Berkeley Pit and Butte Mine-Flooding Operable Unit. website: http://www.mbmg.mtech.edu/env-berkeley.htm.
- (2).Stierle A, Stierle D. Bioprospecting in the Berkeley Pit: Bioactive Metabolites from Acid Mine Waste Extremophiles. In: Atta-Ur-Rahman, editor. Bioactive Natural Products. Volume 32. Elsevier Science Publishers; Amsterdam: 2005. [Google Scholar]
- (3).Stierle AA, Stierle DB, Parker K, Goldstein E, Bugni T, Baarson C, Gress J, Blake D. J. Nat. Prod. 2003;66:1097–1100. doi: 10.1021/np030044w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Stierle D, Stierle A, Hobbs JD, Stokken J, Clardy J. Org. Lett. 2004;6:1049–1052. doi: 10.1021/ol049852k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Stierle A, Stierle D, Kemp K. J. Nat. Prod. 2004;67:1392–1395. doi: 10.1021/np049975d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Stierle A, Stierle D, Kelley K. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71:5357–5360. doi: 10.1021/jo060018d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Stierle DB, Stierle AA, Patacini B. J. Nat. Prod. 2007;70:1820–1823. doi: 10.1021/np070329z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Stierle AA, Stierle DB, Patacini B. J. Nat. Prod. 2008;71:856–860. doi: 10.1021/np0705054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Franchi L, Eigenbrod T, Muñoz-Planillo R, Nuñez G. Nat. Immunol. 2009;10:241–256. doi: 10.1038/ni.1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Ona VO, Li M, Vonsattel JPG, Andrews LJ, Khan SQ, Chung WM, Frey AS, Menon AS, Li XJ, Stieg PE, Yuan J, Penney JB, Young AB, Cha JHJ, Friedlander RM. Nature. 1999;399:263–267. doi: 10.1038/20446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Li M, Ona VO, Guegan C, Chen M, Jackson V, Andrews LJ, Olszewski AJ, Stieg PE, Lee J, Przedborski S, Friedlander RM. Science. 2000;288:335–339. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5464.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Rabuffetti M, Sciorati C, Tarozzo G, Clementi E, Manfredi AA, Beltramo M. J. Neurosci. 2000;20:4398–4404. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-12-04398.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Ming X, Li W, Maeda Y, Blumberg B, Raval S, Cook SD, Dowling PC. J. Neurol. Sci. 2002;197:9–18. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(02)00030-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Furlan R, Martino G, Galbiati F, Poliani PL, Smiroldo S, Bergami A, Desina G, Comi G, Flavell R, Su MS, Adorini L. J. Immunol. 1999;163:2403–2409. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Franchi L, Eigenbrod T, Muñoz-Planillo R, Nuñez G. Nat. Immunol. 2009;10:241–256. doi: 10.1038/ni.1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Stienstra R, Joosten LB, Koenen T, van Tits B, van Diepen JA, van den Berg SAA, Rensen PCN, Voshol PJ, Fantuzzi G, Hijmans A, Kersten S, Mueller M, van den Berg WB, van Rooijen N, Wabitsch M, Kullberg B-J, van der Meer JWM, Kanneganti T, Tack CJ, Netea MG. Cell Metab. 2010;12:593–605. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Vincent JA, Mohr S. Diabetes. 2007;56:224–230. doi: 10.2337/db06-0427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Jha S, Srivastava SY, Brickey WJ, Iocca H, Toews A, Morrison JP, Chen VS, Gris D, Matsushima GK, Jenny P-Y, Ting JP-Y. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:15811–15820. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4088-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Gamblin TC, Chen F, Zambrano A, Abraha A, Lagalwar S, Guillozet AL, Lu M, Fu Y, Garcia-Sierra F, LaPointe N, Miller R, Berry RW, Binder LI, Cryns VL. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003;100:10032–10037. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1630428100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Lewis AM, Varghese S, Xu H, Alexander HR. J. Transl. Med. 2006;4:48–59. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-4-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Granot T, Milhas D, Carpentier S, Dagan A, Segui B, Gatt S, Levade T. Leukemia. 2006;20:392–399. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Okamoto M, Liu W, Luo Y, Tanaka A, Cai X, Norris DA, Dinarello C, Fujita M. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:6477–6488. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.064907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Voronov E, Shouval DS, Krelin Y, Cagnano E, Benharroch D, Iwakura Y, Dinarello CA, Apte RN. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003;100:264–2650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437939100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Paugh BS, Bryan L, Paugh SW, Wilczynska KM, Alvarez SM, Singh SK, Kapitonov D, Rokita H, Wright S, Griswold-Prenner I, Milstien S, Spiegel S, Kordula T. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:3408–3417. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807170200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Lu T, Tian L, Han Y, Vogelbaum M, Stark GR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007;104:4365–4370. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700118104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Schlosser S, Gansauge F, Ramadani M, Beger H-G, Gansauge S. FEBS Letters. 2001;491:104–108. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02144-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Muerkoster SS, Lust J, Arlt A, Hasler R, Witt M, Sebens T, Schreiber S, Folsch UR, Schafer H. Oncogene. 2006;25:3973–3981. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Muerkoster S, Wegehenkel K, Arlt A, Witt M, Sipos B, Kruse ML, Sebens T, Kloppel G, Kalthoff H, Folsch UR, Schafer H. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1331–1337. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-1860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Arlt A, Vorndamm J, Muerkoster S, Yu H, Schmidt WE, Folsch UR, Schafer H. Cancer Res. 2002;62:910–916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Jin L, Yuan RQ, Fuchs A, Yao Y, Joseph A, Schwall R, Schnitt SJ, Guida A, Hastings HM, Andres J, Turkel G, Polverini PJ, Goldberg ID, Rosen EM. Cancer. 1997;80:421–434. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970801)80:3<421::aid-cncr10>3.0.co;2-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Elaraj DM, Weinreich DM, Varghese S, Puhlmann M, Hewitt SM, Carroll NM, Feldman ED, Turner EM, Alexander HR. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:1088–1096. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Rudolphi K, Gerwin N, Verzijl N, van der Kraan P, van den Berg W. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11:738–746. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00153-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Cascão R, Polido-Pereira J, Canhão H, Rodrigues AM, Navalho M, Raquel H, Mourão AF, Resende C, Fonseca JE, Moita LF. J. Transl. Med. 2010;8:35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Furlan R, Martino G, Galbiati F, Poliani PL, Smiroldo S, Bergami A, Desina G, Comi G, Flavell R, Su MS, Adorini L. J. Immunol. 1999;163:2403–2409. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Rabuffetti M, Sciorati C, Tarozzo G, Clementi E, Manfredi AA, Beltramo M. J. Neurosci. 2000;20:4398–4404. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-12-04398.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Reyes F, Arda A, Martin R, Fernandez R, Rueda A, Montalvo D, Gomez C, Jimenez C, Rodriguez J, Sanchez-Puelles J. J. Nat. Prod. 2004;67:1190–1192. doi: 10.1021/np049903m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Osmanova N, Schultze W, Ayoub N. Phytochem Rev. 2010;9:315–342. [Google Scholar]
- (38).Yang S-W, Chan T-M, Terracciano J, Patel R, Patel M, Gullo V, Chu M. J. Antibiot. 2006;59:720–723. doi: 10.1038/ja.2006.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Schlörke O, Zeeck A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006:1043–1049. [Google Scholar]
- (40).Fuska J, Uhrn D, Proksa B, Voticky Z, Ruppeldt J. J. of Antibiotics. 1986;39:1605–1608. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.39.1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Komai S, Hosoe T, Itabashi T, Nozawa K, Yaguchi T, Fukushima K, Kawai K. Heterocycles. 2005;65:2771–2776. [Google Scholar]
- (42).Arai T, Sano H. Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho. 1994:6. [Google Scholar]
- (43).Lee YM, Li H, Hong J, Cho HY, Bae KS, Kim MA, Kim D-K, Jung JH. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2010;33:231–235. doi: 10.1007/s12272-010-0207-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Yamaguchi Y, Masuma R, Kim YP, Uchida R, Tomoda H, Omura S. Mycoscience. 2004;45:9–16. [Google Scholar]
- (45).Pavia DL, Lampman GM, Kriz GS. Introduction to Spectroscopy. 3rd edition Harcourt College; Orlando, FL: 2001. p. 53. [Google Scholar]
- (46).Forzato C, Furlan G, Nitti P, Pitacco G, Marchesan D, Coriani S, Valentin E. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2005;16:3011–3023. [Google Scholar]
- (47).Jackman LM, Sternhell S. Applications of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Organic Chemistry. 2nd edition Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1972. p. 171. [Google Scholar]
- (48).Barfield M, Sternhell S. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1972;94:1905–1913. [Google Scholar]
- (49).Tanaka K, Uneme H, Yamagishi N, Tanikaga R, Kaji A. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1980;53:2910–2916. [Google Scholar]
- (50).Johansson M, Kopcke B, Anke H, Sterner O. J. Antibiotics. 2002;55:104–106. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.55.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).Johansson M, Sterner O. Org. Lett. 2001;3:2843–2845. doi: 10.1021/ol016286+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Shoemaker RH. Nature Reviews. 2006;6:813–823. doi: 10.1038/nrc1951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53). [accessed 5/12/11]; http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/mtweb/targetinfo?moltid=GC19100&moltnbr=9698.
- (54). [accessed 5/12/11]; http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/mtweb/targetinfo?moltid=GC29740&moltnbr=29739.
- (55). [accessed 5/12/11]; http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/mtweb/targetinfo?moltid=GC29740&moltnbr=29739.
- (56). [accessed 5/12/11]; http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/mtweb/targetinfo?moltid=GC226538&moltnbr=131271.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.