Abstract
Phosphorylation is the most studied protein post-translational modification (PTM) in biological systems since it controls cell growth, proliferation, survival, etc. High resolution/high mass accuracy mass spectrometers are used to identify protein phosphorylation sites due to their speed, sensitivity, selectivity and throughput. The protocol described here focuses on two common strategies: 1) Identifying phosphorylation sites from individual proteins and small protein complexes, and 2) Identifying global phosphorylation sites from whole cell and tissue extracts. For the first, endogenous or epitope tagged proteins are typically immunopurified (IP) from cell lysates, purified via gel electrophoresis or precipitation and enzymatically digested into peptides. Samples can be optionally enriched for phosphopeptides using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) or titanium dioxide (TiO2) and then analyzed by microcapillary liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Global phosphorylation site analyses that capture pSer/pThr/pTyr sites from biological sources sites are more resource and time-consuming and involve digesting the whole cell lysate, followed by peptide fractionation by strong cation exchange chromatography (SCX), phosphopeptide enrichment by IMAC or TiO2 and LC-MS/MS. Alternatively, one can fractionate the protein lysate by SDS-PAGE, followed by digestion, phosphopeptide enrichment and LC-MS/MS. One can also IP only phospho-tyrosine peptides using a pTyr antibody followed by LC-MS/MS.
Keywords: phosphorylation, mass spectrometry, LC-MS/MS, SCX, IMAC, immunoprecipitation, SDS-PAGE, nano-LC, phosphoproteomics
Introduction
Phosphorylation of proteins plays an important role in cellular signaling events and metabolic processes and is therefore the most studied post translational modification (Choudhary and Mann; Zarei et al.; White, 2008). The determination of phosphorylated peptides in a biological sample is most easily achieved using mass spectrometry due to sensitivity, selectivity and throughput (Yates et al., 2009). The phospho-proteome of mammalian cells and tissues is complex and displays a wide dynamic range of varying concentration. In order to overcome the human proteome complexity and determine the phospho-proteome content, it is necessary to use either enrichment, purification or sample fractionation at the protein or peptide level (Eyrich et al.). These methods utilize gel electrophoresis, ion exchange chromatography, and microcapillary HPLC.
Proteomic approaches to analyzing phosphorylation usually involve selective isolation of phosphopeptides and subsequent fragmentation in a mass spectrometer to identify both the peptide sequence and phosphorylation site. Suitable mass spectrometers are capable of high resolution and high mass accuracy and include hybrid instruments containing orbitrap analyzers and time-of-flight (TOF) mass analyzers (Ahmed, 2008). In hybrid linear ion trap-orbitrap style mass spectrometers (LTQ-Orbitrap XL, Velos Pro Orbitrap or Velos Elite Orbitrap series, ThermoFisherScientific) (Makarov and Scigelova), peptide precursor ions are analyzed in the orbitrap at high resolution/high mass accuracy at ≤1–2 ppm mass accuracy and up to 100,000 resolution and can then either be fragmented in the ion trap or in a collision cell for sequence/phosphorylation analysis. Alternatively, a hybrid quadrupole-TOF instrument (QqTOF) can be used (such as Xevo from Waters; 5600 from AB/SCIEX; 6500 series from Agilent, and microTOF from Bruker). The QqTOF is made up of two quadrupole mass spectrometers followed by a high resolution TOF, peptide precursors are analyzed in the TOF, fragmented in the collision cell and analyzed in the TOF analyzer for both sequence and modification determination. The mass accuracy is similar to orbitrap instruments at sub 2 ppm; however, resolution is lower on the order of ~25K, though sufficient for most phosphopeptide applications.
It is also important to use an online HPLC instrument capable of nanoliter flow rates coupled directly to the mass spectrometer in order to achieve optimal sensitivity in the low femtomole to high attomole range since many phosphorylation events are present in very low abundance (Washburn, 2008). One can use either splitless or manual split HPLC system with microcapillary columns that are capable of flow rates down to ~200 nL/min (e.g. EASY-nLC from ThermoFisherScientific; NanoAcquity from Waters; NanoLC Ultra from Eksigent, etc.). Tandem mass spectrometry (capable of fragmentation) is used in combination with nano-HPLC is referred to as microcapillary liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
In addition to the equipment required, informatics software is necessary to identify peptide sequences and their phosphorylated counterparts. For this purpose, database search engines such as commercially available Mascot (Perkins et al., 1999) and Sequest (Yates et al., 1995) are commonly used to interrogate protein databases for peptide/protein/PTM identifications as well as freely available MaxQuant (Andromeda) (Cox et al.) and XTandem! (Falkner and Andrews, 2005).
This protocol focuses on determining phosphorylation sites using LC-MS/MS. It is important to note that matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) based systems are also capable of identifying phosphorylation sites (Asara and Allison, 1999; Bennett et al., 2002); however, far more work has been performed using LC-MS based systems.
Basic Protocol 1: Single protein (protein complex) phosphorylation site mapping
In order to comprehensively study the functional role of phosphorylation from a specific protein of interest from a cell or tissue source, it is important to identify all phosphorylation sites of the protein from one or more biological conditions. The first step is purifying the protein in sufficient amounts (micrograms) for successful LC-MS/MS analysis. Since the stoichiometric level of phosphorylated peptides can be extremely low compared to the unmodified peptides, the goal is to purify as much protein as possible for optimal success. This is typically done through an epitope tag such as FLAG, HA or Myc or through immunoprecipitation (IP) with a suitable antibody. The next step involves protein purification using either SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) especially for the case of antibody IPs followed by gel band excision proteolytic digestion followed by tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). For the case of epitope tagged proteins, solution based digestions are possible if detergent-free and low salt-containing buffers are used for protein elution (Alternative Protocol 1). In addition, one can choose additional steps prior to LC-MS/MS to enrich phosphorylated peptides using either metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) (Basic Protocol 2) or titanium dioxide beads (TiO2) (Support Protocol 1). Figure 1 shows a flowchart describing the sequential steps used in the following protocol for identifying/mapping phosphorylation sites on single proteins and simple protein mixtures.
Figure 1.
Flowchart describing the sequential steps for identifying phosphorylation sites from single proteins or immunopurified simple protein complexes using tandem mass spectrometry. Describes an optional protocol for enriching phosphopeptides from digestion mixtures.
Materials for Basic Protocol 1
Lysis and IP-buffer: (0.5% NP-40, 1% TritonX-100, NaCl 150 mM, Tris-HCl pH=7.4, EDTA pH=8.0 1 mM, EGTA 1 mM)
Protease and phosphatase inhibitors (1 mM of Na3VO4, 1 mM Aprotinin, 1 mM Leupeptin, 1 mM Pepstatin, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM PMSF, 2.5 mM Sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate)
Liquid nitrogen (−196°C)
Stainless steel mortar with ceramic pestle
Bradford assay (Biorad)
HPLC grade solvents (methanol (MeOH), water (H2O), acetonitrile (ACN))
LC/MS grade water and acetonitrile
Cold acetone (−20°C freezer)
A/G-protein agarose beads
Mini-gel SDS-PAGE apparatus (Bio-Rad or other vendor) with power supply
1X SDS Sample buffer (31.25 mM Tris, pH=6.8; 5% Glycerol; 1% SDS; 0.36 M beta-Mercaptoethanol; 0.0025% Bromophenol blue)
SDS-PAGE Tris-Glycine polyacrylamide gels 10-well, 1-mm (10% fixed or 4–20% gradient, Lonza #58511)
Tris-Glycine SDS Running Buffer (1X formulation: 25 mM Tris, 192 mM Glycine, 0.1% SDS, pH=8.3.)
Coomassie blue stain (15% methanol, 10% acetic acid, 2 g Coomassie Brilliant Blue)
Coomassie destain (15% methanol, 10% glacial acetic acid)
0.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes
1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes
2.0 mL microcentrifuge tubes
15 mL polypropylene conical centrifuge tubes
50 mL polypropylene conical centrifuge tubes
10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3)
55 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) in 100 mM NH4HCO3
100 mM, 50 mM and 20 mM NH4HCO3
Trypsin, TPCK modified sequencing grade (Promega Corp. # 9PIV5113, 20 μg/vial)
Acetic acid (HA): 50 mM
Shaking incubator (37°C)
Refrigerated (4 °C) centrifuge 14,000g speed for microcentrifuge tubes (Eppendorf)
Refrigerated (4°C) centrifuge for 15 mL and 50 mL conical tubes (Beckman)
2% Formic acid (FA)/40% acetonitrile (ACN)
SpeedVac concentrator (ThermoFisherScientific)
TiO2 SpinTips Sample Prep Kit (Protea Biosystems #SP-154-24, Containing TiO2 SpinTips for 20–1000 μL volumes, 25 mL TiO2 Reconstitution and Wash 1 solution, 25 mL of Wash 2 solution, 25 mL of TiO2 Elution solution)
TiO2 Phos-Trap kit (Perkin-Elmer #PRT301001KT, Containing 20x Phos-trap™ Magnetic Beads, Binding Buffer, Washing Buffer, Elution Buffer)
Magnet for microcentrifuge tubes (Fisher Scientific)
Multi-channel pipettor
Vortex shaker
12 x 32 mm autosampler vial (National Scientific, catalog #C4000-87)
HPLC A buffer (99% water, 0.9% ACN, 0.1% FA)
HPLC B buffer (100% ACN)
C18 ZipTip (Millipore, ZTC18S096, 96 count)
ZipTip binding and wash buffer (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA))
ZipTip elution buffer (40% ACN/0.1% TFA)
Pico-Frit packed C18 columns: 75μm ID x 15cm length (New Objective, PF7515-150H002-3P)
High resolution/high mass accuracy mass spectrometer: ThermoFisherScientific (LTQ-Orbitrap XL, Velos Pro Orbitrap, Velos Elite Orbitrap, qExactive), Waters Xevo, AB/Sciex 5600, Agilent QTOF 6500 series, Bruker microTOF, etc.
Nanoflow HPLC: ThermoFisherScientific EASY-nLC, Waters NanoAcquity, Eksigent NanoLC Ultra, Bruker Nanoflow-LC, etc.
Method
Cell lysis
-
1
Prepare cells to make sure they are in log-phase. Lyse a sufficient amount of cells (~107) in ~5 mL of Lysis buffer with protease/phosphatase inhibitors to produce at least 10 mg of protein
NOTE: For lysis of frozen tissue (use ~100 mg to produce 10 mg of protein), grind it using a liquid nitrogen stainless steel mortar with ceramic pestle until it is a powder and let liquefy at 4°C and then immediately add lysis buffer containing protease/phosphatase inhibitors.
-
2
Incubate lysate for 45 minutes at 4°C with gentle rocking in a 15 mL conical tube
-
3
Centrifuge 15 mL tube with lysate for 20 minutes at full speed (14,000g) at 4°C to remove cell debris, keep supernatant
-
4
Take a small aliquot and determine the protein concentration using the Bradford assay
-
5
Transfer to a new tube and dilute the protein lysate to ~2 mg/mL (5 mL total) and keep at 4°C
Immunoprecipitation
-
6
Add ~8–10 μg of antibody or enough to clear the lysate of the protein of interest (varies across different antibodies) and incubate the solution on a rotator from 2 hr - overnight at 4°C
-
7
Wash protein A (or G) agarose beads with 1 mL of Lysis buffer by agitating 5X, centrifuge at 2,500g, discard buffer, repeat 3X and make a 1:1 slurry, at 4°C
-
8
Add 80μL of the beads slurry (40 μL pure beads) to the lysate - antibody solution and incubate for 2 hr on a rotator at 4°C
-
9
Centrifuge at 2,500g for 2 minutes at 4°C, remove supernatant completely
-
10
Wash the protein-antibody-beads complex with 1 mL of Lysis buffer by rocking for 3 minutes at 4°C
-
11
Centrifuge with 2,500g for 2 minutes at 4°C, repeat STEPS 10–11 3X
-
12
Elute the proteins from beads by adding ~80 μL of 1X SDS sample buffer (twice the vol of pure beads) for 5 minutes at 95°C.
NOTE: Proteins can also be eluted from bait protein/antibody complex using competition with a peptide (e.g. FLAG or HA for tagged bait proteins), small molecule or pH change in some cases instead of SDS sample buffer.
SDS-PAGE (preferred for protein purity)
-
13
Load sample (in 1X SDS sample buffer) on a SDS-PAGE gradient or fixed percentage polyacrylamide gel appropriate for purifying the specific MW of the protein of interest.
-
14
Run mini SDS-PAGE at ~120 V for ~1 hr or until the solvent dye front reaches the bottom of the gel for optimal resolution
-
15
Stain the gel with coomassie blue stain for 1 hr at RT and destain the gel overnight at 4°C with at least 5 different solvent changes in the first 2 hr
-
16
Excise the protein gel band(s) of interest, put them in 1.5 mL plain microcentrifuge tube and wash with 150–200 μL of 50% ACN/50% water for 15 minutes and discard supernatant, repeat 1X. The gel sample can be stored in same tube, moist (not submerged), and frozen at −20°C or below.
In-gel digestion
Carrying out in-gel enzymatic digestion (Li et al., 1997) from SDS-PAGE allows for low cost and efficient processing method of samples that removes salts and/or detergents that are part of the lysis buffer and interfere with mass spectrometry analyses. It allows for both sample fractionation and separation and provides protein molecular weight information. The disadvantages are the potential loss of material incurred by the additional sample manipulation steps introduced by loading samples onto gels and potential losses during peptide extraction from gels after tryptic digestion, however, these drawbacks are relatively minor.
-
17
Dry the gel bands in a SpeedVac concentrator for ~15 minutes with no heat.
-
18
Reduce the gel with a volume sufficient to cover the gel pieces with 10 mM DTT in 100 mM NH4HCO3 at 56°C for 30 minutes
-
19
Add 100% ACN to shrink the gel pieces (same volume like in STEP 18) for ~5 minutes, RT.
-
20
Remove liquid and add 55 mM IAA in 100 mM NH4HCO3 to the gel with the same volume that was used for reduction (STEP 18) and keep in the dark (closed drawer), for 30 minutes at RT.
-
21
Wash gel pieces (volumes as needed) with 100 mM NH4HCO3 for 10 minutes at RT. Discard buffer and shrink the gel piece with 100% ACN for ~5 minutes, RT
-
22
Remove all liquid and swell with same volume as in STEP 18 of 100 mM NH4HCO3 for ~5 minutes, RT
-
23
Remove all liquid and dehydrate/shrink with the same volume of 100% ACN as in STEP 18 for 5 minutes at RT.
-
24
Remove all liquid and completely dry gel in SpeedVac with no heat for ~15 minutes
-
25
On ice, add a volume of 25 ng/μL trypsin (195μL 50 mM NH4HCO3 + 5μL of 1μg/μL TPCK modified trypsin in 50 mM acetic acid) according to the following guideline based on gel size: [Small = 14 μL, Medium = 18 μL, Large = 22 μL]
NOTE: Different enzymes can be used separately in addition to trypsin in STEP 25 such as chymotrypsin, AspN or GluC for increasing the protein’s amino acid coverage.)
-
26
Incubate 15 minutes on ice, then add an additional volume of 50 mM NH4HCO3 (enough to completely cover gel slice)
-
27
Digest overnight (>12 hr) at 37oC in a shaking thermal incubator
-
28
Add 30–45μL (or as needed) 20 mM NH4HCO3 (depending on the gel size, gel must be covered) and incubate for 10 minutes at 37°C with shaking. Spin down in benchtop microcentrifuge for 30 seconds and collect supernatant and add to a plain 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube.
-
29
Add ~50–75μL (or as needed) of 2% formic acid/40% acetonitrile and incubate for 15 minutes at 37oC with shaking. Spin down in benchtop microcentrifuge for 30 seconds and add supernatant to first extraction.
-
30
Partially dry down in SpeedVac with no heat to a final volume of 10 μL.
Alternative Protocol 1: Precipitation (for IP elution with peptide or small molecule)
Acetone precipitation cleans protein samples of both salts and detergents (ThermoScientific, 2009). Use only when proteins are eluted by competition without IgG contamination since excess IgG will suppress phosphopeptides of interest.
-
1
Cool the required volume of acetone to −20°C in freezer.
-
2
Place protein sample in acetone-compatible tube.
-
3
Add four times the sample volume of cold (−20°C) acetone to the tube.
-
4
Vortex tube and incubate for 60 minutes at −20°C.
-
5
Centrifuge 10 minutes at 14,000g, 4°C.
-
6
Decant and properly dispose of the supernatant, being careful to not dislodge the protein pellet.
-
7
Repeat STEPS 3–6 1X
-
8
Allow the acetone to evaporate from the uncapped tube at room temperature for 30 minutes. Do not over-dry pellet, or it may not dissolve properly.
In-solution digestion (precipitated protein)
-
9
Add 20 μL of 10 mM DTT solution (same for gel digests) to the sample pellet and incubate for 30 minutes at 56°C.
-
10
Add 20 μL of 55 mM IAA solution (same for gel digests) and incubate for 30 minutes at RT in dark.
-
11
Dilute sample to 200 μL with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution pH~8.3 (same for gel digests).
-
12
Add 2.0 micrograms (μg) of trypsin (2 μL of the 1 μg/μL TPCK modified trypsin solution from STEP 25)
-
13
Incubate overnight at 37°C with shaking.
-
14
The next day, add 20 μL of 5% TFA to stop digest and the sample is ready for clean-up. Take 1–2 μL to check pH ~3.5 (pH paper is sufficient)
-
15
Concentrate sample in SpeedVac to a final volume of 10 μL
Purification and Concentration of solution digest
-
16
Prepare C18 ZipTip by aspirating/expelling 20 μL of 100% ACN, discard washes, repeat 1X
-
17
Aspirate/expel 20 μL of 0.1% TFA/40% ACN, discard washes, repeat 2X
-
18
Equilibrate ZipTip by aspirating/expelling 20 μL of 0.1% TFA, discard washes, repeat 3X
-
19
Load acidified peptide digest onto ZipTip, by aspirating/expelling the sample solution 5X, save flow-through
-
20
Wash loaded sample with 20 μL 0.1% TFA buffer by aspirating/expelling, discard washes, repeat 4X
-
21
Elute with 10 μL of 0.1% TFA/40% ACN by aspirating/expelling the same solution 5X into a new 0.5 mL microcentrifuge tube or 12 x 32 mm autosampler vial
-
22
Add 40μL HPLC A buffer, dry down in SpeedVac to 10 μL final volume
Tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
-
23
Inject a 3–5 μL aliquot (depending upon amount of starting material) by microcapillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (IMPORTANT: Do not inject more than half of the sample in case of a system failure)
-
24
An HPLC system capable of nanoliter flow rates is needed. This can be a split or splitless system. Use a C18 packed analytical column with typical dimensions of 75 μm ID x 15 cm length at a flow rate of ~250 nL/min for optimal sensitivity.
NOTE: packed analytical columns can be purchased commercially or empty columns can be purchased and self-packed with C18 material (Lee, 2001)
-
25
Set up method for data-dependent acquisition (DDA) or “shotgun” mode over a 90 minute LC-MS/MS acquisition using an appropriate high resolution/high mass accuracy tandem mass spectrometer. It is typical to collect a single MS spectrum followed by 5–10 MS/MS spectra per DDA cycle with a 120 second exclusion window and a 2.5 m/z MS/MS isolation window.
NOTE: One can set the mass spectrometer to include specific m/z values representing phosphopeptides of interest to increase the sensitivity of detection through “inclusion lists” or fixed targeted scan events (Egan et al.; Yang et al.; Dibble et al., 2009).
-
26
The nano-LC gradient conditions should be the following: Initial conditions 2% B; 2% B to 38% B over 90 minutes; 38% B to 95% B over 2 minutes; hold at 95% B for 4 minutes; 95% B to 2% B over 1 minute; hold at 2% B for 12 minutes to re-equilibrate column.
NOTE: One can optionally also use in-line micro filters and/or trap columns to help further purify samples and extend analytical column life.
Database searching and phosphorylation site identification
-
27
The raw MS/MS fragmentation data must be processed using database search engine software such as commercially available Sequest (ThermoFisherScientific) or Mascot (Matrix Science, Ltd.) at http://www.matrixscience.com/. These software programs contain algorithms to extract MS/MS datafiles for querying protein databases such as the annotated all-species Swiss-Prot (http://www.uniprot.org/downloads) or species specific databases from IPI (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/IPI/). Alternatively, one can use freeware search engines such as XTandem! (http://www.thegpm.org/tandem/) or Andromeda within MaxQuant software environment (http://www.maxquant.org/).
-
28
Once downloaded, it is recommended that the protein database is also set up as a decoy database. This can be either a database of reversed sequences or random sequences and is usually concatenated with the target (forward) database. This allows one to calculate a false discovery rate (FDR) (Elias et al., 2005) in order to statistically evaluate the search results.
-
29
In the search engine, use the following parameters:
Enzyme: Trypsin (cleavage at C-term of Lys (K)/Arg (R)
Precursor mass tolerance: ≤ 15 ppm for a well-calibrated mass spectrometer
Differential modifications: oxidation +15.9949 on Met (M); phosphorylation +79.9663 on Ser (S)/Thr (T)/Tyr (Y)
-
Fragment ion tolerance: ≤ 15 ppm for high mass accuracy MS/MS (HCD, TOF, Orbitrap) and ~ 0.08 Da for low mass accuracy MS/MS (ion trap CID, quadrupole CID)
NOTE: Alternatively, one can use a single entry database with no enzyme specificity. This is useful when enzymes other than trypsin or combinations of enzymes were used for digestion of the protein; however, more rigorous validation is required.
Interpretation of Phosphorylation sites
Phosphorylation results in a peptide ion with a +80 Da mass increase compared to the unmodified peptide for each phosphorylated Ser, Thr, or Tyr residue. In addition, site localization can be achieved on a peptide through the fragmentation pattern whereby fragment ions starting at the modification site will reflect the +80 Da shift. Increased confidence in phosphopeptide assignments can be gained by considering specific spectral features, for example, the facile neutral loss of phosphoric acid (−98 Da) from Ser and Thr phosphorylated peptides upon fragmentation with (Hunter and Games, 1994; Asara and Allison, 1999) Tyr phosphorylation tends to show a prominent loss of metaphosphoric acid (−80 Da). While this can help indicate the presence of a phosphate group, it can occasionally adversely affect the ability of search engines to identify phosphopeptides with sufficient scores due to the reduction in sequence specific fragment ions as they are transferred to the neutral loss (Boersema et al., 2009). This loss is more prominent during fragmentation with ion traps than with collision cell mass analyzers.
-
30
Set threshold search engine scores so that the FDR is ≤1.0 %. This assures that quality spectra and true phosphopeptide matches are accepted in the analysis.
-
31
For critically important phosphorylation sites, view the MS/MS spectrum to verify that the b- (fragment ions from the N-terminus of the peptide) and y- ions (fragment ions from C-terminus) are consistent with the predicted sequence and modification site from the search engine.
-
32
Software is available for creating amino acid coverage maps including ProteinReport in Proteomics Browser Software (ThermoFisherScientific or http://www.mcb.harvard.edu/microchem/) and Scaffold PTM Software (Proteome Software, Inc.) as shown in Figure 2.
NOTE: One can crudely assess the stoichiometry of a phosphorylation site by comparing the number of sequence events (dark green lines) for the phosphorylated (containing magenta highlight, Figure 2) peptide versus the non-phosphorylated peptide (Gwinn et al., 2008).
-
33
Software is also available to perform site localization of phosphorylation using probabilistic algorithms such as ASCORE (Beausoleil et al., 2006) within ScaffoldPTM software (Proteome Software, Inc. or at http://ascore.med.harvard.edu/) and MaxQuant (Cox and Mann, 2008; Cox et al., 2009) at http://maxquant.org/.
Figure 2.
A) Example of a SDS-PAGE mini gel purification of protein(s) from different biological conditions via immunoprecipitation (IP). B) Amino acid coverage map showing the tryptic peptides sequenced by LC-MS/MS in dark green and the detected phosphorylation sites highlighted in magenta. Light green highlights oxidation, an in vitro processing artifact. Ideally, for successful phosphopeptide mapping of a protein, amino acid coverage should exceed ~80%. Phosphopeptides can be enriched by using TiO2 or IMAC and additional proteolytic enzymes can be used for digestion to increase amino acid coverage.
Support Protocol 1: Phosphopeptide Enrichment
Affinity based enrichment phosphopeptides with immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) can also be used to enhance the number of identified phosphopeptides in an analysis. Typically, one can use commercially available reagents that include Fe3+, Ga3+ or titanium dioxide (TiO2) (Larsen et al., 2005). TiO2 has lower affinity for multi-phosphopeptides and works better for enrichment of monophosphorylated peptides while IMAC has a higher efficiency for the recovery of multi-phosphorylated peptides (Thingholm et al., 2006). Sometimes, TiO2 can also contain nonspecific binding from acidic non-phosphorylated peptides (contain D and E residues). This can be significantly reduced by including 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB), phthalic acid, or glycolic acid and high concentrations of TFA in the loading buffer (Thingholm et al., 2008; Villen and Gygi, 2008)
For enrichment of phosphopeptides several commercial kits are available including IMAC (PHOS-Select Iron affinity gel, SIGMA) and TiO2 (Phos-Trap kit, Perkin-Elmer or TiO2 SpinTips, Protea Biosciences). We suggest that half of the simple peptide mixture be run directly by LC-MS/MS and the second half of the sample can be used for phosphopeptide enrichment using a support protocol below.
OPTION 1: Protea TiO2 SpinTips Sample Prep Kit (Protea Biosciences)
Preparation
-
1
Ensure that the packing material is at the bottom of the tip by gently tapping the tip to displace any packing material sticking to the top of the red cap.
-
2
Place SpinTip adaptor onto a 2 mL centrifuge tube.
-
3
Wash the SpinTip to wet the packing material by adding 100 μL TiO2 Reconstitution and Wash 1 Solution to the top of the SpinTip using a micropipette.
-
4
Centrifuge the system at 4,000g for 3–5 minutes. Discard eluent and repeat STEPS 3–4.
Binding
-
5
Reconstitute ~5–20 μL of the peptide sample in ~200 μL TiO2 Reconstitution and Wash 1 Solution and sonicate until the sample is completely dissolved.
-
6
Load 200 μL of the sample solution by adding it to the top of the SpinTip and centrifuging the system at 4,000g for 3–5 minutes, RT.
-
7
Wash the sample to elute salts and other loosely-bound components by adding 100 μL TiO2 Reconstitution and Wash 1 Solution to the top of the SpinTip.
-
8
Centrifuge the system at 4,000g for 3–5 minutes. Discard eluent and repeat STEPS 7–8.
Elution
-
9
Transfer the SpinTip to a new, clean 2 mL centrifuge tube to collect the sample during elution.
-
10
Elute the sample by adding 100 μL TiO2 Elution Solution to the top of the SpinTip. Centrifuge the system at 4,000g for 3–5 minutes. Repeat the SpinTip sample elution 2X using the same elution solution.
-
11
Partially dry the solution to ~ 5 μL in SpeedVac and then add 100 μL of HPLC A buffer and transfer to a 12x32 mm autosampler vial
-
12
Partially dry to 5 μL and inject onto LC-MS/MS system.
OPTION 2: Phos-Trap TiO2 phosphopeptide enrichment kit (PerkinElmer)
Preparation
-
1
Mix the vial of magnetic beads so that the beads are evenly suspended in solution. Take 20 μL from vial of magnetic beads and 180 μL of HPLC grade water for each experiment. For example, for 3 experiments, take 60 μL of beads with a 1 mL pipet since beads can clog the 200 μL pipets and add 540 μL of water and mix in an appropriately sized tube.
-
2
Dispense 200 μL of bead solution into each 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube.
-
3
Place on a magnet to catch the beads and remove the liquid without removing any beads.
-
4
Wash beads with 200 μL of binding buffer. Add buffer “off” the magnet and lightly shake to suspend the beads evenly in solution for 1 minute.
-
5
Put tray (tube) on magnet to remove liquid without removing beads, repeat 2X.
Binding and washing
-
6
Dilute purified peptide sample 1:10 in binding buffer but do not exceed 150 μL in total volume. Partially SpeedVac the sample prior to dilution if necessary.
-
7
Add the sample solution to the beads and incubate for 60 minutes while shaking continuously to keep the beads suspended in solution.
-
8
Put 1.5 mL micro centrifuge tube on magnet and remove liquid (not beads) from the tubes and transfer to a tube labeled ‘TiO2 flow through’. These peptide mixtures can be analyzed in the mass spectrometer if one is interested in non-phosphorylated peptides.
-
9
Wash the beads with 200 μL of binding buffer for 1 minute, put tube on magnet and remove liquid, repeat 3X.
-
10
Wash the beads with 200 μL of wash buffer for 1 minute, put tube on magnet and remove liquid.
Elution
-
11
Elute the phosphopeptides by adding 35 μL of elution buffer to beads and incubate for 15 minutes with continuous shaking.
-
12
Place tube on a magnet to catch the beads, aspirate solution but DO NOT draw up any beads and add the elution containing the sample to a 12x32 mm autosampler vial.
-
13
Add 50 μL of A buffer and SpeedVac to 5 μL
-
14
Inject entire 5 μL volume onto LC-MS/MS system
Anticipated Results
Figure 2 shows the typical results that one should obtain from an experiment whereby a protein was immunoprecipitated from cell lysate, purified by SDS-PAGE, excised, digested with trypsin and analyzed by microcapillary LC-MS/MS. In order to enhance the detection of phosphorylation sites, one can use phosphopeptide enrichment methods such as metal affinity with TiO2 and/or IMAC. Figure 3A shows an example of a MS/MS spectrum acquired using CID for a pSer-containing peptide displaying the typical neutral loss of phosphoric acid observed by most Ser/Thr phosphopeptides. Figure 3B shows the computational results determining the site localization of a phosphopeptide. Software such as ASCORE (http://ascore.med.harvard.edu/ or Scaffold PTM software), GraphMod (Proteomics Browser Software) and MaxQuant (http://maxquant.org/) are capable of determining the accurate phospho site in a given peptide.
Figure 3.
A) Example of a MS/MS fragmentation spectrum of the phosphorylated peptide sequence GpSPEFPGMVTDQGSR at the first serine residue. Notice the dominant neutral loss of phosphoric acid from the precursor ion and sequence specific fragment ions, including phosphate losses. B) Software such as GraphMod or ASCORE can be used to help identify the site specificity in a phosphopeptide. In this example for the phosphopeptide sequence KIpSTEDINK, the first S residue is the correct modification site. This is especially useful when adjacent or multiple STY residues are present on a phosphopeptide.
Time Consideration per sample
Protein IP
Lysis and immunoprecipitation: 2 hr to overnight (12–16 hr)
Digestion (in-gel or in-solution): overnight (12–18 hr)
Optional: ZipTip purification: 1 hr
Optional: TiO2 Phosphopeptide enrichment: 2–3 hr
LC-MS/MS: 2–3 hr
-
Data analysis 1–3 hr
Total time: 2–3 days
Basic Protocol 2: Global Phosphorylation Analysis (Ser/Thr/Tyr)
In addition to determining the phosphorylation sites from purified proteins or protein complexes, it is possible to perform global phosphorylation site profiling directly from whole cell extracts and tissue sources (Olsen et al.; Kirkpatrick et al., 2005). Using the procedures to follow, researchers have discovered up to 36,000 in vivo phosphorylation sites from various mouse organ tissues though most global phosphorylation studies result in several thousand phosphorylation sites detected (Olsen et al.; Beausoleil et al., 2004; Oppermann et al., 2009; Pan et al., 2009). While these analyses are very time-consuming, require milligrams of material, offline strong cation exchange (SCX) peptide fractionation and a dozen 2-hour LC-MS/MS runs, one can achieve hundreds to thousands of phosphopeptide identifications from a biological sample. In general, the ratio of threonine, serine and tyrosine protein phosphorylation is approximately 90%, 10% and 0.05%, respectively (Hunter and Sefton, 1980). We describe a protocol for determining Ser/Thr/Tyr phosphopeptide identifications on a global scale as well as a protocol for isolating just the Tyr phosphopeptides from cell and tissue extracts. Figure 4 shows a flowchart outlining the sequential steps used in the following protocol for identifying potentially thousands of phosphorylation sites.
Figure 4.
Flowchart describing the sequential steps for identifying global phosphorylation sites from cell and tissue lysate using fractionation, phosphopeptide enrichment and tandem mass spectrometry. Describes method for identification of Ser/Thr/Tyr phosphorylation as well as pTyr isolation.
Materials for Basic Protocol 2
Urea buffer (8 M Urea, 1.5 M Thiourea, 20 mM HEPES pH=8.0)
Protease/phosphatase inhibitors (Basic Protocol 1)
45 mM DTT (Mix 180 μL of 1.25 M DTT (19.25 g/100 mL) in 5 mL HPLC grade water, add to sample in ~1/10 dilution (e.g. 0.5 mL DTT in 5 mL sample))
110 mM IAA (Dissolve 209 mg IAA in 10 mL HPLC grade water, add to sample in ~1/10 dilution)
Sequencing grade modified Trypsin, 1 mg/vial (Worthington, LS02123)
Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) 20%, 10%, 1%, 0.1% solutions (vol/vol)
Sep-Pak C18 cartridges 6cc/500 mg (Waters, WAT036790) for P-TYR IP method
Sep-Pak C18 cartridges 3cc/50 mg (Waters, WAT054960) for SCX method
Sep-Pak Elution Buffer (0.1% TFA/40% ACN)
250-μL pipette tips for StageTip preparation
IMAC (PHOS-Select Iron affinity gel, SIGMA # P9740)
IMAC binding buffer (40% ACN (vol/vol), 25 mM FA, H2O)
IMAC elution buffer A (50 mM K2HPO4/NH4OH, pH 10.0)
IMAC elution buffer B (500 mM K2HPO4, pH=7)
Formic acid (1%, 10% solutions (vol/vol))
Empore 3M C18 material
Cutter device (Hamilton, Needle Kel-F hub (KF), point style 3, gauge 16, # 90516; plunger assembly N, RN, LT, LTN for model 1702 (25 μL), # 1122-01)
Strong cation exchange (SCX) Column: PolySULFOETHYL A 250 x 9.4 mm; 5 μm pore size; 200Å (PolyLC, 259-SE0502)
SCX buffer A (7 mM KH2PO4, pH=2.65, 30% ACN (vol/vol))
SCX buffer B (7 mM KH2PO4, 350 mM KCl, pH=2.65, 30% ACN (vol/vol))
Note for SCX buffers: Organic solvents affect the pH reading, the pH adjustments for buffers A and B should be performed before the addition of ACN.
StageTip and Sep-Pak Binding and Wash Buffer (0.1% TFA (vol/vol) in H2O)
StageTip Elution Buffer (40% ACN (vol/vol), 0.5% HA (vol/vol) in H2O)
Cell Lysis of cells and/or tissues
-
1
Prepare cells to make sure they are in log-phase.
Note: One can stimulate the cells with FCS to increase the general phosphorylation signaling or treat with specific growth factors and/or drugs to activate/inhibit a particular signaling pathway.
-
2
Lyse enough cells (~107–108) or tissue (~150–200 mg) to produce ~15–20 mg of protein in ~5–10 mL of Urea lysis buffer with protease/phosphatase inhibitors.
NOTE: For lysis of frozen tissue, grind it using a liquid nitrogen stainless steel mortar with ceramic pestle until it is a powder and let liquefy at 4°C and then immediately add Urea lysis buffer containing protease/phosphatase inhibitors.
-
3
Aspirate/expel the lysate several times with a 1 mL pipette
-
4
Sonicate for 1 minute at 4°C, repeat 2X
-
5
Centrifuge 15 mL tube with lysate for 5 minutes at full speed at 15°C to remove cell debris, keep supernatant
-
6
Take a small aliquot and determine the protein concentration using the Bradford assay
Digestion
-
7
Add 1/10 of the solution volume of 45 mM DTT to the protein lysis solution to make a 4.5 mM DTT solution and incubate it for 30 minutes at 56°C.
-
8
Add the same amount of 110 mM IAA and incubate it for 30 minutes at RT in the dark to make an 11.0 mM IAA solution.
-
9
Dilute sample 1:5 with water to final concentration of 1.6 M urea and a final pH=8.0
-
10
Dissolve trypsin in 1 mL of 50 mM acetic acid to the final concentration of 1 μg/μL in trypsin vial
-
11
Add trypsin solution to the lysate (~75:1 substrate/protease ratio)
-
12
Incubate the solution overnight at 37°C on a thermal incubator (~450 rpm).
-
13
The next day stop the protease reaction by adding 20% TFA to 1/20 of the digestion solution volume to a final concentration of 1% TFA
-
14
Let it stand for 10 minutes at RT
-
15
Clear the sample of debris by centrifuging for 10 minutes 14,000g (r = 300 mm: 2100 rpm) at 15°C, keep the supernatant (digested peptides)
Purification
Samples first need to be purified prior to subsequent pTyr IP or SCX fractionation to eliminate interference
-
16
Check pH of cleared sample to be sure it is between pH=2.0–3.0
-
17
Pre-wet 6cc/500mg C18 Sep-Pak with 3 mL of ACN
-
18
Wash with 3 mL of 0.1% TFA/40% ACN
-
19
Wash with 3 mL of 0.1% TFA, discard washes, repeat 2X
-
20
Load peptide digestion sample (STEP 15) onto Sep-Pak
-
21
Wash column with 3 mL of 0.1% TFA, discard washes, repeat 2X
-
22
Elute peptides with 1 mL of 0.1% TFA/40% ACN, repeat 2X and combine eluate for 3 mL total volume.
-
23
Divide sample into two microcentrifuge tubes. Dry down partially in SpeedVac with no heat to ~200–400 μL, combine both samples into one 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube.
-
24
Dry down completely to a pellet in a SpeedVac with no heat
Strong Cation Exchange (SCX) (peptide fractionation)
This approach fractionates the digested peptides according to their solution charge using strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography. Phosphopeptide enrichment with IMAC is then used after peptide separation prior to LC-MS/MS.
In strong cation exchange (SCX)-chromatography, trypsinized peptides are eluted from the column according to their solution charge state. Most phosphorylated peptides at pH=3 carry 1+ or 2+ charges since the peptide charge is reduced by 1 for each negatively charged phosphate group (Olsen and Mann, 2004; Villen and Gygi, 2008). Most non-phosphorylated tryptic peptides carry 2+ and 3+ charges in solution. However, other factors including hydrophobicity also play a role with SCX separation. In addition, attention should be paid to multi-phosphorylated peptides containing a low or neutral net charge because these peptides are unable to bind to the stationary phase and elute in the flow-through fraction. SCX separation should take place using a HPLC system capable of 1 mL/min flow-rates offline from the LC-MS/MS system. This procedure is frequently referred to as multidimensional protein identification technology (MUDPIT) (Washburn et al., 2001; Wolters et al., 2001).
HPLC
-
25
Degas SCX A and B buffers, purge SCX HPLC pumps, clean 1 mL sample loop and equilibrate column with 1% B for 14 minutes at 1 mL/min.
-
26
Load a blank sample containing only SCX A buffer onto sample loop (system in load position) to prepare the HPLC system for subsequent runs
-
27
Inject the blank sample (system in inject position) and run HPLC method at a flow rate of 1 mL/min over a PolySULFOETHYL A SCX column using the following gradient conditions:
1%–30% B: 40 minutes, 30%–50% B in 1 minute, 50%–100% B in 5 minutes, 100% B for 5 minutes, 100%–1% B for 1 minute, 1% B for 14 minutes to re-equilibrate column
-
28
Dilute dried, desalted pellet from STEP 24 in 950 μL of SCX A buffer, vortex to completely dissolve
-
29
Inject 950 μL of sample onto 1 mL sample loop and run SCX method as in STEPS 26–27
Fraction collection
-
30
Collect ~ 3–4 minutes (3–4 mL) fractions from the elution starting at time 0’ for a total of ~12 fractions in separate 15 mL conical tubes
-
31
Concentrate fractions to dryness in SpeedVac with no heat
Purification of salts
-
32
Dissolve dried peptide pellet in 500 μL of 0.1% TFA
-
33
Check pH of cleared sample with pH paper to be sure it is between 2.0–3.0 using 5 μL from each of the 12 fractions
-
34
Pre-wet 3cc/50 mg capacity C18 Sep-Pak with 1 mL of ACN (Prepare 1 Sep-Pak per fraction)
-
35
Wash Sep-Pak with 1 mL of 0.1% TFA/40% ACN
-
36
Wash Sep-Pak with 1 mL of 0.1% TFA, repeat 2X
-
37
Load peptide digestion sample from STEP 32 onto prepared Sep-Pak
-
38
Wash sample on Sep-Pak with 1 mL of 0.1% TFA, repeat 2X
-
39
Elute peptides with 333 μL of Sep-Pak Elution Buffer in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube, repeat 2X with fresh elution buffer and combine for 1 mL total volume
-
40
Dry peptide sample completely to a pellet in a SpeedVac using no heat
Phosphopeptide Enrichment
Since there are no good quality antibodies available to this date for the enrichment of general phosphoserine (pSer) and/or phosphothreonine (pThr) residues, there are two possible strategies for enriching all phosphorylation sites from a complex cell and/or tissue lysate using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using iron as well as TiO2 (see Support Protocol 1).
PHOS-Select IMAC (Sigma)
Preparation
-
41
Prepare 100 μL of IMAC beads by washing them with 1 mL of IMAC binding buffer, turning over the vial 5X to re-suspend all beads and spinning at 2,500g to remove the liquid. Repeat 3X and prepare 50% slurry in the same buffer.
-
42
Prepare twelve 0.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes and place 10 μL of IMAC beads slurry into each. Cutting the end of the pipet tip to a wider opening facilitates pipetting of beads.
Binding
-
43
Dissolve each dried peptide fraction obtained from STEP 40 in 120 μL of IMAC-binding buffer and transfer to the IMAC beads to a total volume of 130 μL.
-
44
Incubate peptides on beads for 60 minutes at RT with vigorous shaking.
-
45
During this time, prepare twelve StageTips by cutting two disks of Empore 3M C18 material with the cutter device and packing into 250-μL pipette tips (Rappsilber et al., 2007).
-
46
Wash and equilibrate packed StageTips by passing through 20 μL of MeOH followed by 20 μL of 40% ACN/0.5% HA and then 2X with 20 μL of 1% FA. For convenience and increased throughput, one can use a centrifuge by holding the StageTips within a 2-mL Eppendorf tube with the top part of a 500 μL Eppendorf body as an adaptor, limiting spinning speed to 2,000g and time to the minimum to get the liquid passed through.
-
47
After the 60-minute incubation in STEP 44, transfer IMAC beads to the top of the StageTips and spin down. The beads will get retained on the StageTip and the solution will pass through. As the buffer contains 40% ACN, nonphosphorylated peptides, which are not retained in the IMAC resin, will not be retained by the C18 material. These peptide mixtures can be collected and analyzed as well in the mass spectrometer, if desired.
-
48
Wash with 50 μL of IMAC binding buffer. Repeat 1X.
-
49
Wash with 40 μL of 1% FA. This step allows equilibrating the StageTip C18.
-
50
Wash with 70 μL of IMAC Elution Buffer B, repeat 2X.
At this point, phosphopeptides are eluted from IMAC resin and retained on the C18 material.
-
51
Wash with 40 μL of 1% FA to remove phosphate salts.
-
58
Elute phosphopeptides from StageTips into 12x32 mm autosampler vials for MS analysis with 40 μL of 40% ACN/0.5% HA.
-
59
Dry down the samples from STEP 47 (nonphosphorylated peptides) and STEP 58 (phosphopeptides) with SpeedVac or lyophilizer.
-
60
Resolubilize the dried samples with 15–20 μL of HPLC A buffer and inject 2–10 μL depending upon sample quantity onto the LC-MS/MS system.
-
61
Run the mass spectrometer according Basic Protocol 1: STEPS 24–31 with the following change: LC-MS/MS gradient and acquisition time of ~120 minutes.
NOTE: For complex samples in Basic Protocols 2 and 3, the LC-MS/MS gradient and acquisition time should be increased from 60–90 minutes to ~120 minutes per sample to increase peptide/protein coverage.
Alternative Protocol 1: SDS-PAGE Protein Fractionation
This protocol involves fractionating proteins from a whole cell extract according to their molecular weight using a SDS-PAGE gel followed by in-gel digestion and subsequent IMAC or TiO2 phosphopeptide enrichment and LC-MS/MS analysis. This is sometimes called GeLC-MS (Chang et al., 2007).
(Several steps have been abbreviated since SDS-PAGE is described In Basic Protocol 1)
Lyse the material in Lysis and IP-buffer containing protease/phosphatase inhibitors for 45 minutes rocking at 4°C, centrifuge for 20 minutes at full speed at 4°C, keep supernatant
Load samples by SDS-PAGE according to the capacity of the mini-gel (fixed or gradient) and run completely to bottom of gel.
Stain with coomassie and destain overnight. The stain is mostly used here as a lane and protein amount indicator and not to resolve bands.
Cut gel into ~10–12 equal sections and place gel pieces in 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes.
Follow the above method for in-gel digestion (Basic Protocol 1: STEPS 17–30) and dry to a final volume of ~10 μL.
For phosphopeptide enrichment of gel digested fractions, follow either Support Protocol 1 (TiO2) or Basic Protocol 2 (IMAC) to prepare sample for LC-MS/MS.
Run the mass spectrometer according Basic Protocol 1: STEPS 24–31 with the following change: LC-MS/MS gradient and acquisition time of ~120 minutes.
Time Consideration per sample
Global pThr/pSer/pTyr
Lysis and digestion: overnight (12–18 hr)
Sep-Pak purification: 6 hr to overnight including dry-down step
SCX HPLC run: 2 hr
Sep-Pak purification of salted peptides: 6 hr to overnight with dry-down step
IMAC/TiO2 phosphopeptide enrichment: ~2–3 hr
StageTip peptide purification: ~ 2–3 hr
LC-MS/MS analysis for 12 samples: ~28–39 hr
-
Data analysis for 12 runs: 8–12 hr
Total time: ~7 days
Basic Protocol 3: Phosphotyrosine (pTyr) Site Identification
Although phosphotyrosine appears for only 0.05% of cellular protein phosphorylation it is the critical key player in a lot of signaling events starting from receptor tyrosine kinases. In addition, 20% of the kinome represents protein tyrosine kinases and reveals the importance for tyrosine phosphorylation events (Manning et al., 2002). Due to the larger size of the modified tyrosine residue it is more qualified for developing antibodies for purification of proteins or peptides from complex cellular extracts containing pTyr residues (Rush et al., 2005).
Materials for Basic Protocol 3
Phosphotyrosine P-Tyr-100 mouse antibody (mAb), sepharose conjugated (Cell Signaling Technology, # 9419)
P-Tyr-100 Elution buffer: 0.15% TFA solution (vol/vol)
1 M Tris (not pH adjusted)
Preparation
Before the pTyr immunoprecipitation can be performed, the solution must be desalted and the pH must be adjusted to neutral
-
1
Add 1.4 mL Lysis and IP-buffer (Basic Protocol 1) to digested and purified sample pellet (STEP 24, Basic Protocol 2), sonicate in 4°C water bath
-
2
Check pH, if less than pH=5, add 1 M Tris (not pH adjusted) dropwise until the solution is in the 6.0–7.5 pH range
-
3
Centrifuge 5 minutes at 1,800g (r = 60 mm: 5000 rpm) keep supernatant, cool on ice
Binding to pTyr Ab
-
4
Using 15–20 mg of total protein prior to digestion, add ~80 μg of P-TYR-100 mAB (#9419, Cell Signaling Technology) bead solution
-
5
Incubate for 2 hr on tube rotator at 4°C
-
6
Centrifuge with 2,500g for 1 minute at 4°C
-
7
Remove supernatant completely with gel loading tips to avoid removal of beads
-
8
Wash beads with 1 mL Lysis and IP-buffer, agitate by inverting five times, centrifuge at 2,500g for 1 minute at 4°C, discard buffer, repeat 1X
-
9
Wash beads with 1 mL HPLC grade water (4°C) to remove the detergents, agitate by inverting 5X, centrifuge at 2,500g for 1 minute, discard wash buffer, repeat 4X
Elution
-
10
Elute with 55 μL of P-Tyr-100 Elution buffer (0.15% TFA), tap bottom of tube several times to disrupt bead packing, incubate 10 minutes at RT
-
11
Tap again and centrifuge for few seconds at 2,500g, keep supernatant
-
12
Add 45 μL of 0.15% TFA tab bottom several times, and centrifuge for a few seconds at 2,500g, keep supernatant (with gel loading tip) and combine with previous elution (STEP 11) for a total of 100 μL
Purification and Concentration
-
13
Centrifuge for 1 minute at 2,500g to remove potential remaining agarose beads in tube
-
14
Divide sample in two equal parts
-
15
Prepare C18 ZipTip: cut off the tip of a 200 μL tip, attach to top of ZipTip, it should fit tightly into upper ring of ZipTip.
-
16
Prepare ZipTip by aspirating/expelling 40 μL of 100% ACN, discard washes, repeat 1X
-
17
Aspirate/expel 40 μL of 0.1% TFA/40% ACN, discard washes, repeat 2X
-
18
Equilibrate ZipTip by aspirating/expelling 40 μL of 0.1% TFA, discard washes, repeat 3X
-
19
Place tip in 1st half of the sample, aspirate/expel 10X in sample tube (do not discard)
-
20
Place tip in 2nd half of the sample, aspirate/expel 10X in sample tube (do not discard)
-
21
Wash the ZipTip with 55 μL of 0.1% TFA, repeat 2X
-
22
Elute the peptides with 15 μL of 0.1% TFA/40% ACN but aspirate/expel 5X prior to final elution into a new 12 x 32 mm autosampler vial
-
23
Add 35 μL 0.1% TFA to the peptide elution (50 μL total vol), partially dry to 10 μL
IMPORTANT: Do not dry completely or peptides may be irreversibly lost
-
24
Inject 5μL of sample onto LC-MS/MS system with a 2–3 hour nano-LC gradient (save half of the sample in case of a system failure).
P-Tyr IP
Lysis and digestion: overnight (12–18 hr)
Sep-Pak purification: 6 hr to overnight including dry-down step
Immunoprecipitation: 2 hr–4hr
ZipTip Purification: 1.5 hr
LC-MS/MS: 2–3 hr
-
Data analysis: 2–3 hr
Total time: ~3 days
COMMENTARY
Background Information
Currently, outside of the very low throughput of site-specific antibodies, mass spectrometry is the only known and validated technology for identifying and in some cases quantifying individual sites of phosphorylation on proteins. Mass spectrometry is routinely used by researchers in the fields of molecular and cellular biology. While mass spectrometers are expensive and sophisticated pieces of equipment, many times the work is performed either within a core facility or in collaboration with an analytical laboratory specializing in the mass spectrometry field. While high resolution mass spectrometers are being acquired in some biology laboratories, it is not yet widespread to the cost of the equipment and maintenance required for optimal performance. The protocols above are designed to aid both the biologist who is getting into the mass spectrometry field or already possesses a state-of-the art mass spectrometer and a reference for collaborators of biologists already ion the mass spectrometry field to optimize strategies for identifying sites of phosphorylation from biological sources. Much of the work involved in this protocol is bench level work with cells and proteins and that is generally handled very well by the biologist. Mass spectrometry level expertise comes into play for acquisition of phosphopeptide data and subsequent processing and interpretation of the acquired data. However, software has improved to the point where trained technicians can interpret the data using statistics. Additional bioinformatics analyses of the data were not described in this protocol and require expertise in those fields.
Critical Parameters and Troubleshooting
| Digestion failed |
|
| No peptide peaks detected by LC-MS/MS |
|
| Peaks in LC/MS chromatogram but no peptide identifications |
|
| No phosphorylation sites detected |
|
| High levels of contaminating proteins (gel based) |
|
Anticipated Results
An example of a typical result of global phosphoproteomics analysis from a K562 cancer cell lysate is shown in Figure 5A, C using SCX, IMAC and tandem mass spectrometry, the approach produced ~ 2000 phosphorylation sites from 10 mg of starting material (Breitkopf et al.). Figure 5A and B show typical examples of a SCX chromatogram for peptide separation as well as a typical coomassie stained SDS-PAGE gel from a cell extract for protein fractionation. Figure 5C shows the ratio of Ser, Thr and Tyr phosphorylation across two different experiments from 12 IMAC purified SCX fractions and 24 LC-MS/MS experiments.
Figure 5.
Example of the typical results of global phosphorylation site identification from A) SCX peptide fractionation followed by IMAC phosphopeptide enrichment and subsequent LC-MS/MS analysis or B) SDS-PAGE protein fractionation followed by trypsin digestion, TiO2 phosphopeptide enrichment and LC-MS/MS. C) Data acquired by tandem mass spectrometry is searched against protein databases and results are validated to a false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 1%.
Literature cited
- Ahmed FE. Utility of mass spectrometry for proteome analysis: part I. Conceptual and experimental approaches. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2008;5:841–864. doi: 10.1586/14789450.5.6.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asara JM, Allison J. Enhanced detection of phosphopeptides in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry using ammonium salts. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 1999;10:35–44. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(98)00129-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beausoleil SA, Jedrychowski M, Schwartz D, Elias JE, Villen J, Li J, Cohn MA, Cantley LC, Gygi SP. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12130–12135. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404720101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beausoleil SA, Villen J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1285–1292. doi: 10.1038/nbt1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bennett KL, Stensballe A, Podtelejnikov AV, Moniatte M, Jensen ON. Phosphopeptide detection and sequencing by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom. 2002;37:179–190. doi: 10.1002/jms.271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boersema PJ, Mohammed S, Heck AJ. Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom. 2009;44:861–878. doi: 10.1002/jms.1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breitkopf SB, Oppermann FS, Keri G, Grammel M, Daub H. Proteomics analysis of cellular imatinib targets and their candidate downstream effectors. J Proteome Res. 9:6033–6043. doi: 10.1021/pr1008527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang CC, Chen SH, Ho SH, Yang CY, Wang HD, Tsai ML. Proteomic analysis of proteins from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid reveals the action mechanism of ultrafine carbon black-induced lung injury in mice. Proteomics. 2007;7:4388–4397. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choudhary C, Mann M. Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 11:427–439. doi: 10.1038/nrm2900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1367–1372. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox J, Matic I, Hilger M, Nagaraj N, Selbach M, Olsen JV, Mann M. A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:698–705. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox J, Neuhauser N, Michalski A, Scheltema RA, Olsen JV, Mann M. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J Proteome Res. 10:1794–1805. doi: 10.1021/pr101065j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dibble CC, Asara JM, Manning BD. Characterization of Rictor phosphorylation sites reveals direct regulation of mTOR complex 2 by S6K1. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:5657–5670. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00735-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Egan DF, Shackelford DB, Mihaylova MM, Gelino S, Kohnz RA, Mair W, Vasquez DS, Joshi A, Gwinn DM, Taylor R, Asara JM, Fitzpatrick J, Dillin A, Viollet B, Kundu M, Hansen M, Shaw RJ. Phosphorylation of ULK1 (hATG1) by AMP-activated protein kinase connects energy sensing to mitophagy. Science. 331:456–461. doi: 10.1126/science.1196371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elias JE, Haas W, Faherty BK, Gygi SP. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nat Meth. 2005;2:667–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eyrich B, Sickmann A, Zahedi RP. Catch me if you can: mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics and quantification strategies. Proteomics. 11:554–570. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falkner J, Andrews P. Fast tandem mass spectra-based protein identification regardless of the number of spectra or potential modifications examined. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:2177–2184. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gwinn DM, Shackelford DB, Egan DF, Mihaylova MM, Mery A, Vasquez DS, Turk BE, Shaw RJ. AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol Cell. 2008;30:214–226. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunter AP, Games DE. Chromatographic and mass spectrometric methods for the identification of phosphorylation sites in phosphoproteins. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1994;8:559–570. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1290080713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunter T, Sefton BM. Transforming gene product of Rous sarcoma virus phosphorylates tyrosine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980;77:1311–1315. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.3.1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkpatrick DS, Gerber SA, Gygi SP. The absolute quantification strategy: a general procedure for the quantification of proteins and post-translational modifications. Methods. 2005;35:265–273. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larsen MR, Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Roepstorff P, Jorgensen TJ. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005;4:873–886. doi: 10.1074/mcp.T500007-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee H. Protocol for Packing a Reversed-Phase Microcapillary Column. 2001 http://www.proteomecenter.org/protocols/Packing%20a%20Reversed-Phase%20Microcapillary%20Column.pdf.
- Li G, Waltham M, Anderson NL, Unsworth E, Treston A, Weinstein JN. Rapid mass spectrometric identification of proteins from two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels after in gel proteolytic digestion. Electrophoresis. 1997;18:391–402. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150180313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Makarov A, Scigelova M. Coupling liquid chromatography to Orbitrap mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 1217:3938–3945. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science. 2002;298:1912–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.1075762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olsen JV, Mann M. Improved peptide identification in proteomics by two consecutive stages of mass spectrometric fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:13417–13422. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405549101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olsen JV, Vermeulen M, Santamaria A, Kumar C, Miller ML, Jensen LJ, Gnad F, Cox J, Jensen TS, Nigg EA, Brunak S, Mann M. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci Signal. 3:ra3. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oppermann FS, Gnad F, Olsen JV, Hornberger R, Greff Z, Keri G, Mann M, Daub H. Large-scale proteomicsanalysis of the human kinome. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:1751–1764. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800588-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan C, Olsen JV, Daub H, Mann M. Global effects of kinase inhibitors on signaling networks revealed by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:2796–2808. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900285-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999;20:3551–3567. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rappsilber J, Mann M, Ishihama Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat Protocols. 2007;2:1896–1906. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rush J, Moritz A, Lee KA, Guo A, Goss VL, Spek EJ, Zhang H, Zha XM, Polakiewicz RD, Comb MJ. Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:94–101. doi: 10.1038/nbt1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ThermoScientific. Acetone Precipitation of Proteins. 2009:1–2. http://www.piercenet.com/files/TR0049-Acetone-precipitation.pdf.
- Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Robinson PJ, Larsen MR. SIMAC (sequential elution from IMAC), a phosphoproteomics strategy for the rapid separation of monophosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated peptides. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7:661–671. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700362-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thingholm TE, Jorgensen TJ, Jensen ON, Larsen MR. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides using titanium dioxide. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:1929–1935. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villen J, Gygi SP. The SCX/IMAC enrichment approach for global phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1630–1638. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Washburn MP. Sample preparation and in-solution protease digestion of proteins for chromatography-based proteomic analysis. Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2008;Chapter 23(Unit 23):26, 21–23, 26, 11. doi: 10.1002/0471140864.ps2306s53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR., 3rd Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:242–247. doi: 10.1038/85686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White FM. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of signaling network dynamics. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19:404–409. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolters DA, Washburn MP, Yates JR., 3rd An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem. 2001;73:5683–5690. doi: 10.1021/ac010617e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang X, Turke AB, Qi J, Song Y, Rexer BN, Miller TW, Janne PA, Arteaga CL, Cantley LC, Engelman JA, Asara JM. Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Targeted Mode to Identify Activators of Class IA PI3Kin Cancer. Cancer Res. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yates JR, 3rd, Eng JK, McCormack AL, Schieltz D. Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modified peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database. Anal Chem. 1995;67:1426–1436. doi: 10.1021/ac00104a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yates JR, Ruse CI, Nakorchevsky A. Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;11:49–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zarei M, Sprenger A, Metzger F, Gretzmeier C, Dengjel J. Comparison of ERLIC-TiO2, HILIC-TiO2 and SCX-TiO2 for global phosphoproteomics approaches. J Proteome Res. doi: 10.1021/pr200092z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





