Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1977 Jan;59(1):106–116. doi: 10.1172/JCI108607

Suppressor function of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in normal individuals and in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

B Bresnihan, H E Jasin
PMCID: PMC333337  PMID: 830659

Abstract

Normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells demonstrated increased DNA synthesis and secretion of newly synthesized protein when suboptimal concentrations of Concanavalin A (Con A) were added to the cultures after 24-h incubation in vitro. Cells stimulated by Con A, 1 mug/ml, after 24-h incubation demonstrated 3.0 times more tritiated thymidine incorporation, and 4.4 times more 14C-amino acid incorporation into newly synthesized secreted protein, than cells stimulated at 0 h (P less than 0.001). The acquisition of increased responsiveness was not abrogated by washing and resuspending the cells in fresh medium. Since the increased responsiveness could be inhibited by the addition to the cultures of small numbers of cells previously activated by Con A it is suggested that the enhanced reactivity acquired in culture represents the loss of a subpopulation of suppressor cells that modulate the T-lymphocyte response. Cells from nine patients with active, untreated systemic lupus erythematosus demonstrated normal responses to optimal concentrations of Con A added at 0 h, but an impaired response to Con A, 1 mug/ml. When these cells were incubated for 24 h, a significant increased response to Con A was not observed. This observation suggests that patients with active SLE lack circulating suppressor cells. When seven SLE patients were again studied after corticosteroid therapy had led to clinical improvement, the response to Con A, 1 mug/ml, added after 24-h incubation was similar to that observed in normal controls, suggesting that suppressor function in SLE returns as disease activity declines.

Full text

PDF
106

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersson J., Melchers F. Induction of immunoglobulin M synthesis and secretion in bone-marrow-derived lymphocytes by locally concentrated concanavalin A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Feb;70(2):416–420. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.2.416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson J., Sjöberg O., Möller G. Mitogens as probes for immunocyte activation and cellular cooperation. Transplant Rev. 1972;11:131–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb00048.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Basten A., Miller J. F., Sprent J., Cheers C. Cell-to-cell interaction in the immune response. X. T-cell-dependent suppression in tolerant mice. J Exp Med. 1974 Jul 1;140(1):199–217. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.1.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Broder S., Humphrey R., Durm M., Blackman M., Meade B., Goldman C., Strober W., Waldmann T. Impaired synthesis of polyclonal (non-paraprotein) immunoglobulins by circulating lymphocytes from patients with multiple myeloma Role of suppressor cells. N Engl J Med. 1975 Oct 30;293(18):887–892. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197510302931801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burns F. D., Marrack P. C., Kappler J. W., Janeway C. A., Jr Functional heterogeneity among the T-derived lymphocytes of the mouse. IV. Nature of spontaneously induced suppressor cells. J Immunol. 1975 Apr;114(4):1345–1347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Folch H., Waksman B. H. The splenic suppressor cell. I. Activity of thymus-dependent adherent cells: changes with age and stress. J Immunol. 1974 Jul;113(1):127–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Folch H., Waksman B. H. The splenic suppressor cell. II. Suppression of mixed lymphocyte reaction by thymus-dependent adherent cells. J Immunol. 1974 Jul;113(1):140–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gerber N. L., Hardin J. A., Chused T. M., Steinberg A. D. Loss with age in NZB-W mice of thymic suppressor cells in the graft-vs-host reaction. J Immunol. 1974 Nov;113(5):1618–1625. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ginsberg B., Keiser H. A Millipore filter assay for antibodies to native DNA in sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1973 Mar-Apr;16(2):199–207. doi: 10.1002/art.1780160210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ha T. Y., Waksman B. H. Role of the thymus in tolerance. X. "Suppressor" activity of antigen-stimulated rat thymocytes transferred to normal recipients. J Immunol. 1973 May;110(5):1290–1299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jacobs D. M. Effects of concanavalin A on the in vitro responses of mouse spleen cells to T-dependent and T-independent antigens. J Immunol. 1975 Jan;114(1 Pt 2):365–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jacobson E. B., Herzenberg L. A. Active suppression of immunoglobulin allotype synthesis. I. Chronic suppression after perinatal exposure to maternal antibody to paternal allotype in (SJL x BALB-c)F 1 mice. J Exp Med. 1972 May 1;135(5):1151–1162. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jasin H. E., Ziff M. Immunoglobulin synthesis by peripheral blood cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1975 May-Jun;18(3):219–228. doi: 10.1002/art.1780180305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Malavé I., Layrisse Z., Layrisse M. Dose-dependent hyporreactivity to phytohemagglutinin in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell Immunol. 1975 Feb;15(2):231–236. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(75)90001-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nelson R. A., Jr, Jensen J., Gigli I., Tamura N. Methods for the separation, purification and measurement of nine components of hemolytic complement in guinea-pig serum. Immunochemistry. 1966 Mar;3(2):111–135. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(66)90292-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sampson D., Grotelueschen C., Kauffman H. M., Jr The human splenic suppressor cell. Transplantation. 1975 Nov;20(5):362–367. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197511000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shou L., Schwartz S. A., Good R. A. Suppressor cell activity after concanavalin A treatment of lymphocytes from normal donors. J Exp Med. 1976 May 1;143(5):1100–1110. doi: 10.1084/jem.143.5.1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sjöberg O., Britton S. Antigenic competition in vitro between heterologous erythrocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1972 Jun;2(3):282–288. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830020318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stobo J. D., Paul S., Van Scoy R. E., Hermans P. E. Suppressor thymus-derived lymphocytes in fungal infection. J Clin Invest. 1976 Feb;57(2):319–328. doi: 10.1172/JCI108283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tada T., Takemori T. Selective roles of thymus-derived lymphocytes in the antibody response. I. Differential suppressive effect of carrier-primed T cells on hapten-specific IgM and IgG antibody responses. J Exp Med. 1974 Jul 1;140(1):239–252. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.1.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Talal N., Steinberg A. D. The pathogenesis of autoimmunity in New Zealand black mice. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1974;64(0):79–103. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-65848-8_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Waldmann T. A., Durm M., Broder S., Blackman M., Blaese R. M., Strober W. Role of suppressor T cells in pathogenesis of common variable hypogammaglobulinaemia. Lancet. 1974 Sep 14;2(7881):609–613. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91940-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Winchester R. J., Winfield J. B., Siegal F., Wernet P., Bentwich Z., Kunkel H. G. Analyses of lymphocytes from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Occurrence of interfering cold-reactive antilymphocyte antibodies. J Clin Invest. 1974 Nov;54(5):1082–1092. doi: 10.1172/JCI107852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES