Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
. 2002 Mar 1;6(Suppl 1):P42. doi: 10.1186/cc1742

Non invasive mechanical ventilation delivered by a new 'helmet' versus a standard face mask

D Chiumello 1, E Carlesso 1, A Cadisco 1, S Paganini 1, L Gattinoni 1
PMCID: PMC3333701

We compared in six healthy subjects non invasive mechanical ventilation delivered by a new 'helmet' (large [L] and small [S] size) and by a standard face mask (FM). We tested three different ventilatory setting: a continuous flow CPAP (CPAPCF), a CPAP delivered by a ventilator (CPAPVent) and a pressure support ventilation (PSV). The level of PEEP and PSV were 5 cmH2O while FIO2 was 21%. Tidal volume VT, respiratory rate (RR), work of breathing (WOB L), pressure time product (PTP) were measured.

Our results suggest that during CPAP the three systems are equals while during PSV the FM is better.

Table.

VT (l) RR (bpm) WOB L (J/l) PTP (cmH2O*s/m)
CPAPCF
 Helmet L 0.42 ± 0.05 14.4 ± 4.1 0.36 ± 0.06 81 ± 16
 Helmet S 0.44 ± 0.14 14.8 ± 4.3 0.34 ± 0.06 71 ± 14
 FM 0.50 ± 0.07 14.9 ± 4.1 0.39 ± 0.09 84 ± 17
CPAPVent
 Helmet L 0.56 ± 0.16 14.8 ± 3.6 0.35 ± 0.12 105 ± 52
 Helmet S 0.63 ± 0.12 13.5 ± 2.7 0.31 ± 0.18 85 ± 45
 FM 0.55 ± 0.10 14.8 ± 4.3 0.26 ± 0.17 81 ± 49
PSV
 Helmet L 0.68 ± 0.15 12.5 ± 3.3 0.12 ± 0.1 28 ± 24
 Helmet S 0.68 ± 0.18 13.1 ± 3.7 0.13 ± 0.1 30 ± 21
 FM 0.62 ± 0.15 15.6 ± 3.6 0.01 ± 0.01* 2 ± 1*

*P < 0.05 vs helmet L and helmet S.


Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES