Genetically modified mouse models of cancer invasion and metastasis

Abstract

Tumor invasion and metastasis is a multi-step process that requires adaptation of cancer cells to conditions that they encounter during their journey to distant body sites. Understanding the molecular processes that underlie this adaptation is of exceeding importance because most cancer patients die because of metastases rather than primary tumors. In this review we assess genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) that have been established to investigate mechanisms of cancer invasion and metastasis.

Introduction

Tumor progression is associated with distinct histopathological changes that are indicative for prognosis. Stromalization and microvessel density increase during tumor progression and tumor cells establish heterotypic molecular interactions with stromal cells that support invasiveness. The acquired ability of tumor cells to locally invade adjacent tissues is the first important step in the invasion-metastasis cascade [1]. Two general strategies have been pursued in mice to investigate invasive tumor progression. The first strategy uses genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) that are suitable for the investigation of early steps in cancer invasion but infrequently give rise to far distant metastases. The second strategy uses transplantation of tumor cells or tumor tissue into host mice and is employed to study early invasiveness but also later stages such as intravasation, extravasation and colonization of tumor cells [2]. Here, we focus on GEMMs for major malignancies in humans and the progress that has been made to model human metastasis.

GEMMs as models for cancer invasion and metastasis

Tumors that appear in GEMMs as a result of the corresponding genetic manipulation often show a low incidence to develop far distant metastasis. This is also true for deletions of tumor suppressor genes that are associated with a high metastatic potential in human cancers. The long latency period makes it difficult to predict the onset of metastasis which impedes monitoring in mice despite the availability of advanced in vivo imaging techniques. Therefore, many researchers favor the use of transplantation models to study metastasis although they might neglect the impact of the immune system or skip important initial steps in the metastatic cascade such as local tissue invasion or intravasation [1,2]. However, several recently established GEMMs might represent promising new tools to investigate invasive processes and metastasis in certain cancer types (Table 1).

Table 1.

GEMMs that display invasive and metastasizing tumors (list is not complete). %: percent of mice with metastases; LN: lymph nodes; GI: gastrointestinal tract; pan.: pancreas; kid.: kidney; AG: adrenal gland; epid.: epididymis; ov.: ovary

Mouse model	Tumor	Metastasis	%	Refs	Weblink
MMTV-rtTA/TetO-NeuNT	Breast	Lung	92	Moody (2002) [5]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12498714
MMTV-ErbB2/MMTV-Cre/PTENflox/flox	Breast	Lung	87.5	Schade (2009) [37]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19435886
MMTV-PyMT	Breast	LN, lung	80–100	Maglione (2001) [4]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11719463
Wap-Cre/Cdh1flox/flox/Trp53flox/flox	Breast	LN, skin, lung, liver, GI, pan., spleen, bone	70	Derksen (2011)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21282721
MMTV-LMW-Cyl-E/Trp53+/−	Breast	LN, lung, head	35.2	Akli (2007)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17671189
MMTV-NeuN	Breast	Lung	11–72	Guy (1992)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1359541
MT-Met	Breast	LN, lung, kid., heart, cecum	–	Jeffers (1998)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9826715
MMTV-Wnt1	Breast	LN, lung	–	Li (2000)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10713683
PB-Cre/PTENflox/flox/Smad4flox/flox	Prostate	LN, Lung	100	Ding (2011) [17]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21289624
Cryptdin-2-Tag	Prostate	LN, lung, liver, bone	85	Garabedian (1998) [12]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9860977
PB-SV40T/t	Prostate	LN, lung	67–100	Gingrich (1996) [38]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8797572
PB-Cre/PTENflox/flox	Prostate	LN, lung	45	Wang (2003) [13]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14522255
Adeno-Cre/KRASG12D/Apcflox/flox	Colon	Liver	20	Hung (2010) [26]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20080688
Adeno-Cre/KRASG12D/LKB1flox/flox	Lung	LN, skeleton	61	Ji (2007) [32]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17676035
Adeno-Cre/KRASG12D/Trp53flox/flox	Lung	LN, distant organs	50	Jackson (2005) [39]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16288016
SP-C-c-Raf/SP-C-c-Myc	Lung	LN, liver	24	Rapp (2009) [29]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19551151
Adeno-Cre/KRASG12D/INK4a−/−	Lung	LN	20	Ji (2007) [32]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17676035
SP-C-c-Myc	Lung	LN, liver	17	Rapp (2009) [29]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19551151
Pdx1-Cre/KRASG12D/Trp53R172H	Pancreas	Liver, lung, LN, diaphragm, AG	80	Hingorani (2005) [40]	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15894267
Rip-VEGF-C-Tag	Pancreas	LN	37	Mandriota (2001)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11179212
Tyr-Cre/BRAFV600E/PTENflox/flox	Melanoma	LN, lung	100	Dankort (2009)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19282848
MT-HGF/SF	Melanoma	Liver, lung, pan., LN, epid., spleen, femur	21	Otsuka (1998)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9823327
K14-PKC	Skin	LN	30	Jansen (2001)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11221859
TRβPV/PV/PTEN+/−	Thyroid	Lung	80	Guigon (2009)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18997818
TRα1−/−/TRβ−/−	Thyroid	Lung	21	Zhu (2010)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20062085
Adeno-Cre/Trp53flox/flox/PTENflox/flox	Bladder	LN, spleen, liver, diaphragm	60	Puzio-Kuter (2009)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19261747
CK19-Tag	Bladder	Lung	20	Grippo (2000)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10980120
Osx1-GFP-Cre/Trp53flox/flox/Rbflox/flox	Osteosarcoma	Lung, liver, AG, spleen, kid., ov.	40	Berman (2008)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18697945
AT-III-Tag	Liver	Lung	10	Dubois (1991)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1660504
α-Amylase-Tag	Adipose	Liver, lung, AG, spleen, heart	–	Fox (1989)	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2785714

Invasive and metastasizing breast cancer models

Human breast cancer frequently metastasizes to liver, bone, lung and brain. To model breast cancer in mice, potential oncogenes such as ErbB2, PyMT, Wnt1 and RAS have been expressed in mammary epithelial cells under control of the mammary gland-specific promoters MMTV and WAP (whey acidic protein). Corresponding mouse models developed breast cancers that frequently metastasized to the lung and the lymph nodes [3]. In particular, MMTV-PyMT mice displayed efficient formation of metastases with a short latency period (Fig. 1) [4]. The MMTV-PyMT transgene has been used as driver oncogene for breast cancer development in various knock-out mouse models which has revealed important gene co-operativities during breast cancer metastasis. Combined MMTV-PyMT/Akt1^−/− mice showed delayed onset of breast cancer formation and compromised metastasis when compared to MMTV-PyMT mice demonstrating the importance of PI3K/Akt signaling [3]. Ablation of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in MMTV-PyMT/Csf-1^−/− mice had no substantial effect on tumor growth but severely compromised breast cancer invasiveness and lung metastasis [3]. Interestingly, TAMs in MMTV-PyMT mice but not tumor cells expressed epidermal growth factor (EGF). By contrast, the EGF receptor was expressed by tumor cells but not TAMs. This indicates that TAMs secrete EGF that acts on tumor cells thereby establishing a heterotypic interaction that supports invasiveness. Secretion of EGF by TAMs is stimulated by CD4⁺ T-cells as has been demonstrated by T-cell ablation in MMTV-PyMT/Rag1^−/− and MMTV-PyMT/IL-4^−/− mice [3]. These results suggest a heterotypic signaling network between innate immune cells, adaptive immune cells and tumor cells in breast cancer invasion. In addition to mammary gland-specific constitutive expression of oncogenes, doxycycline-inducible expression of TetO-NeuNT and TetO-c-Myc transgenes has been employed for the establishment of mouse models with invasive breast cancer [3]. Of these models, MMTV-rtTA/TetO-NeuNT mice developed metastasizing breast cancer with high frequency [5]. Mouse models with conditional deletion of important tumor suppressor genes in mammary epithelial cells have also been used successfully for modeling metastatic breast cancer. MMTV-Cre/Trp53^flox/flox mice developed breast tumors that efficiently metastasized to lung and liver albeit after a long latency period (Fig. 1) [6]. The latency period for primary tumor formation was shorter in MMTV-Cre/Brca1^flox/flox/Trp53^+/− mice and metastases were detected in lymph nodes and lung (Fig. 1) [7]. No efficient bone metastasis has been reported in breast cancer mouse models.

Figure 1.

Mouse models (GEMMs) with efficient invasion and metastasis rates. The route of metastasis from primary organs (here shown as mouse organs) to distant sites is indicated by arrows. Major target organs for human metastases and corresponding GEMMs that model the human tropisms are shown. Strong arrows: most frequent sites for metastasis; weak arrows: less frequent sites for metastasis; interrupted arrows: currently no suitable mouse model available.

Invasive and metastasizing prostate cancer models

The primary target organ of human prostate cancer metastases is the bone. Several prostate cancer mouse models have been established that progress beyond the stage of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and display metastasis. These models are based on conditional deletion of tumor suppressor genes in the prostatic epithelium or on epithelial-specific expression of oncogenes. In most cases, the rat probasin (PB) promoter was used for Cre recombinase or oncogene expression. To increase tissue specificity, a composite ARR₂PB promoter was developed that contains two androgen responsive regions [8,9]. The TRAMP model for prostatic adenocarcinomas is based on PB promoter driven expression of SV40T/t in the prostatic epithelium and developed metastases in the lung and lymph nodes. Rarely, metastases in the bone, kidney and adrenal glands were observed in TRAMP mice [8,9]. Less aggressive prostatic carcinomas developed in the LADY mouse model that is similar to TRAMP but lacks expression of the SV40 small t antigen (therefore, LADY mice still display protein phosphatase 2A activity). Prostatic tumors in LADY mice were invasive and expressed neuroendocrine markers (a subtype of human prostate cancer develops from neuroendocrine cells) but did not metastasize [8,9]. However, additional expression of the serine protease hepsin which is highly expressed in human prostate cancer under control of the PB promoter conferred metastasis [10]. As an alternative approach, the gene for SV40T was knocked into the PSP94 (prostate secretory protein 94) genomic locus that is highly expressed in the prostate. Resulting PSP-KIMAP mice developed PINs and invasive carcinomas that metastasized to the lymph nodes, lung and liver [11]. In addition to SV40 antigens, Her-2/Neu and c-Myc was ectopically expressed in PB-Her-2/Neu, PB-c-Myc and ARR₂PB-c-Myc transgenic mice which resulted in PINs and invasive adenocarcinomas. PB-c-Myc mice developed invasive adenocarcinomas later than ARR₂PB-c-Myc which was attributed to a lower level of transgenic c-Myc expression [8,9]. To establish a model for neuroendocrine prostate cancer, the Cryptdin-2 promoter has been used to express SV40T in neuroendocrine cells of the prostate. The resulting prostatic tumor model developed invasive carcinomas that expressed neuroendocrine markers and metastasized predominantly to lymph nodes and liver (infrequently also to lung and bone) [12].

Conditional deletion of tumor suppressor genes in the prostate epithelium was mainly achieved with ARR₂PB-Cre transgenic mice. Deletion of PTEN, a tumor suppressor gene that is frequently mutated in human prostate cancer, resulted in invasive carcinomas that metastasized to lymph nodes and lung in 45% of mice [13]. Unfortunately, no metastasis to the bone was observed indicating that the tropism of metastasising prostate cancer in this model differs from human prostate cancer. In contrast to PTEN, conditional PB-Cre-mediated deletion of Apc in the prostate resulted in invasive adenocarcinomas but no metastasis was observed [8,9]. Among compound mouse models, PTEN^+/−/Nkx3.1^−/− mice developed fewer PINs than Nkx3.1-proficient PTEN^+/− mice that, however, progressed to invasive prostate cancer with lymph node metastases beyond one year of age [14]. Moreover, prostate-specific expression of Fgf8b in PTEN^+/− mice resulted in adenocarcinoma formation by nine months of age that led to lymph node metastases [15]. Conditional inactivation of Trp53 and Rb in the prostatic epithelium resulted in prostatic adenocarcinoma formation and metastasis to lymph nodes, liver and lung [16]. Recently, compound ARR₂PB-Cre/PTEN^flox/flox/SMAD4^flox/flox mice with conditional deletion of PTEN and SMAD4 in the prostatic epithelium have been generated. These mice represent a model for invasive prostate cancer that metastasizes with 100% penetrance to lymph nodes and lung. Moreover, this model has demonstrated that TGFβ/SMAD4 signaling imposes a barrier against prostate cancer metastasis. Unfortunately, no efficient bone metastasis has been observed in this model [17].

Invasive and metastasizing colorectal cancer models

Human colorectal tumors predominantly metastasize to the liver. Several genetic and chemical mouse models have been employed to investigate intestinal cancer formation and progression. The most frequently used chemical model for the induction of colorectal tumors is the AOM/DSS model which is based on a single injection of the carcinogen AOM followed by repeated treatment of mice with Dextransulfate (DSS) in the drinking water [18]. The most commonly used genetic models exploit the strong tumor-inducing potential of Apc mutations (Apc^Min, Apc^Δ716, Apc^1638N) upon loss of heterozygosity (LOH). These mouse models develop tumors preferentially in the small intestine but not readily in the colon [19]. Conditional inactivation of a floxed Apc allele has been alternatively employed to induce intestinal tumors. Although AOM/DSS treatment or mutation of Apc can lead to the formation of invasive carcinomas at certain frequencies, metastases have not been observed in these models. Invasiveness and tumor progression were enhanced by AOM/DSS treatment or introduction of additional mutations in compound mouse models. AOM/DSS treated CEACAM1^−/− mice (CEACAM1 is a cell adhesion molecule that is downregulated in human colorectal carcinomas) develop a higher percentage of colorectal carcinomas that invade the muscularis mucosa than corresponding control animals [20]. Similarly, compound Apc^1638N/CEACAM1^−/−, Apc^Min/PTEN^+/− and Apc^Min/SMAD3^−/− mice were prone to the development of invasive carcinomas which highlights the importance of these pathways in intestinal cancer progression [21–23]. We have demonstrated that conditional deletion of Stat3 in intestinal epithelial cells (using the Villin-Cre transgene) of Apc^Min mice promotes invasiveness and nuclear localization of β-Catenin via a CEACAM1-dependent mechanism [24]. However, no liver metastases have been detected in these models which is most likely due to premature lethality of tumor bearing mice. Evidence for liver metastases has been obtained in compound Apc^1638N/pVillin-KRAS^G12V mice. Although metastases have not been observed histopathologically in the liver, tumor-specific pVillin-KRAS^G12V transgene expression was detected in liver tissue of a subset of tumor bearing mice indicating the presence of disseminated tumor cells or micrometastases [25]. More recently, a stochastic model for sporadic colorectal cancer has been established that gives rise to Cdx-2⁺ liver metastases with considerable efficiency [26]. This model is based on Adeno-Cre injection into the colon of LSL-KRAS^G12V/Apc^flox/flox mice (Fig. 1). Adeno-Cre treatment deleted the floxed Apc alleles and the loxP-stop-loxP cassette in front of the oncogenic KRAS^G12V gene with low frequency in crypt stem cells. This protocol avoids development of colorectal tumors at high numbers therefore preventing premature lethality and allowing tumor progression and metastasis.

Invasive and metastasizing lung cancer models

Human lung cancer often metastasizes to liver, bone and brain whereas most mouse models develop adenomas or less frequently adenocarcinomas that infrequently metastasize [27]. However, a recently reported lung cancer mouse model developed liver metastases that could be backtraced to the primary tumors [28]. Transgenic approaches have used the surfactant protein C (SP-C) and Clara cell secretory protein (CCSP) promoters for oncogene or Cre recombinase expression in type II pneumocytes or non-ciliated secretory Clara cells, respectively. Expression of SV40T, c-Raf or c-Myc under control of these promoters resulted in aggressive adenocarcinomas [27]. Metastases were observed in SP-C-c-Myc single transgenic mice at lower frequency but combined expression of SP-C-c-Myc and SP-C-c-Raf in a compound double-transgenic mouse model promoted formation of metastases [29]. Other approaches used these promoters in the context of the ‘Tet-on’ system for inducible transgene expression. CCSP-rtTA/TetO₇-KRAS^G12D, CCSP-rtTA/TetO₇-BRAF^V600E and CCSP-rtTA/TetO₇-PIK3CA^H1047R mice developed adenocarcinomas after doxycycline treatment. Lung tumor formation and progression in the first two models was accelerated in a Trp53- or INK4a-negative genetic background but no metastasis was observed [27]. In addition to oncogenic KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA (encoding p110α of PI3K) alleles, different variants of EGF receptor originally identified in human lung cancers have been inducibly expressed. CCSP-rtTA/TetO₇-EGFR^DEL, CCSP-rtTA/TetO₇-EGFR^L858R and CCSP-rtTA/TetO₇-EGFR^vIII mice developed invasive adenocarcinomas but no metastases after doxycycline application [27]. Knock-in approaches were used as alternative to transgenic mice. Knock-in of the Trp53^R270H allele that was identified in Li-Fraumeni patients into the endogenous Trp53 locus gave rise to aggressive lung adenocarcinomas that even metastasized (such tumors were not found in Trp53^−/− mice) [30]. The most frequently used mouse model for inducible lung cancer development is the LSL-KRAS^G12D model that harbours an oncogenic knock-in KRAS^G12D allele preceded by a loxP-stop-loxP cassette. Cre induction using a Cre-transgenic mouse or a viral infection protocol with Adeno-Cre particles leads to deletion of the floxed stop cassette followed by KRAS^G12D expression and formation of lung adenocarcinomas [31]. LSL-KRAS^G12D was crossed with CCSP-Cre/PTEN^flox/flox mice leading to combined activation of RAS and PI3K signaling that resulted in the formation of advanced vascularized adenocarcinomas but not metastasis [27]. Instead of PTEN, deletion of tumor suppressor proteins LKB1, INK4a or Trp53 in LSL-KRAS^G12D led to the formation of metastasizing lung adenocarcinomas (Fig. 1) [27]. Interestingly, LSL-KRAS^G12D/LKB1^flox/flox mice developed not only adenocarcinomas but also squamous cell carcinomas and large cell carcinomas upon treatment with Adeno-Cre particles [32]. Metastases in the lymph nodes (61% of mice) and axial skeleton (9% of mice) were observed in this model. Recently, a LSL-KRAS^G12D/Trp53^flox/flox lung cancer model has been reported where tumor formation was induced by lentiviral delivery of Cre (Lenti-Cre) to the lung. These mice developed metastases to lymph nodes, pleura, kidney, heart, adrenal glands and liver with high frequency (Fig. 1). Because Lenti-Cre integrates randomly into the genome, the integration site was used as a unique molecular identifier to link primary tumors with related metastases which allowed the identification of metastasis-regulating genes [28].

Invasive and metastasizing pancreatic cancer models

Pancreatic cancer in humans is a very aggressive malignant disease with rapid formation of metastases in the liver. The classical mouse model for pancreatic carcinoma is the Rip-Tag model that expresses the SV40T oncogene under control of the rat insulin promoter [33]. This model was very instructive for the investigation of tumor progression, angiogenesis and metastasis and was also used in different drug treatment protocols. However, the most frequent type of pancreatic cancer is represented by pancreatic ductular adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and not islet carcinomas that develop in Rip-Tag mice. Similar to lung adenocarcinoma models, most models for PDAC rely on LSL-KRAS^G12D mice [31]. Deletion of the loxP-stop-loxP cassette was performed with Pdx1-Cre and p48-Cre transgenic mice which was sufficient for the formation of invasive and metastatic PDAC albeit at low frequency [34]. Preferential sites of metastasis in these models were lymph nodes, liver, lung, pleura and the neural plexus [35]. Compound Pdx1-Cre/LSL-KRAS^G12D or p48-Cre/LSL-KRAS^G12D mice with additional deletion of tumor suppressors INK4a, Trp53, SMAD4 and TGFβRII developed invasive PDAC that metastasized to many organs (Fig. 1) [34]. Moreover, knock-in of KRAS^G12D into the Mist1 locus (Mist1^tmKRASG12D mice) that is expressed during pancreas development resulted in invasive and metastatic pancreatic cancers of different histopathologic appearance. Tumor progression and formation of liver metastasis were promoted in Mist1^tmKRASG12D Trp53^+/− mice [36] confirming cooperativity between KRAS and loss of Trp53 (Fig. 1). Pancreatic cancer models that are based on inducible Cre activity are EL-tTA/TRE-Cre/LSL-KRAS^G12V and EL-CreER^T/cLGL-KRAS mice that develop invasive and invasive/metastatic PDAC, respectively [34].

Comparison and further development of metastatic mouse models

The value of GEMMs as mouse models for invasion and metastasis of cancers is influenced by several parameters that include the human relevance of introduced genetic changes to get metastasizing tumors, penetrance of metastasis and target organs of metastasizing cells. Still, some GEMMs do not satisfactorily model human metastasis and for preclinical studies, evaluation of the drug response of human cancer cells in xenograft models might be required (Table 2). However, metastasis-associated gene expression patterns obtained from human tumor samples or via in vivo selection of organ-specific metastatic tumor cell lines might be used to introduce newly identified genetic changes that improve metastasis rates in compound GEMMs. The complexity of tumor metastasis could, however, require a further refinement of experimental tools in mouse models (e.g. the application of different recombination systems to get sequential activation or deletion of genes relevant for metastasis).

Table 2.

Advantages and disadvantages of GEMMs and transplantation systems for investigation of metastasis (for review see reference [2])

	GEMMs	Allografts	Xenografts
Pros	Immunocompetent environment	Immunocompetent environment	Use of human tumor cells
Tumors in original tissues	Wide range of metastatic target organs	Range of orthologous metastatic tropism
Cre-mediated genetic manipulation of stroma/tumor cells	Timely well defined onset of metastasis	Timely well defined onset of metastasis
Defined genetic background	Short latency	Usually short latency
Cons	Extensive genetic manipulation in mice	Limited number of suitable cell lines	Immunodeficient environment
Metastatic tropism often different from human tumors	Non-human system	Non-responsiveness of tumor cells to some host factors (e.g. mouse IL-6)
Timely not well defined onset of metastasis		Altered behavior of human tumor cells at high passages
Long latency
Non-human system

GEMMs and human metastatic disease

GEMMs have been established to understand the major mechanisms underlying invasion and metastasis in humans and for the evaluation of antimetastatic drug treatments. Major drawbacks are imposed by the pharmacokinetics of drugs that are not applicable to humans and the differential tropism of mouse and human tumors. Moreover, most mouse models for invasive and metastasizing cancer rely on expression or deletion of the ‘usual suspects’ of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Human cancers also rely on these genes but metastasis might be more complex and affected by additional pathways that are not yet taken into account in available mouse models.

Conclusions

Syngeneic and xenograft models using human cancer cells transplanted into host mice might still provide the method of choice to investigate far distant metastasis or to apply drug treatments. At present, GEMMs are more commonly used for the investigation of tumor initiation or local invasiveness because metastasis occurs infrequently or is restricted to lymph nodes and lung. However, recently established mouse models for metastasizing prostate and lung cancer nourish the hope that GEMMs with comparable metastasis rates and tropisms to human cancers will be developed which are of preclinical relevance.

Section editors: Wolfgang Mikulits – Institute of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria Mario Mikula – Institute of Medical Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.