Abstract
The melibiose permease of Salmonella typhimurium (MelBSt) catalyzes symport of melibiose with Na+, Li+ or H+, and bioinformatics analysis indicates that a conserved Gly117 (helix IV) is part of the Na+-binding site. We mutated Gly117 to Ala, Pro, Trp or Arg; the effects on melibiose transport and binding of cosubstrates depended on the physical-chemical properties of the side chain. Compared with WT MelBSt, the Gly117→Ala mutant exhibited little difference in either cosubstrate binding or stimulation of melibiose transport by Na+ or Li+, but all other mutations reduced melibiose active transport and efflux, and decreased the apparent affinity for Na+. The bulky Trp at position 117 caused the greatest inhibition of melibiose binding, and Gly117→Arg yielded less than a 4-fold decrease in the apparent affinity for melibiose at saturating Na+ or Li+ concentration. Remarkably, the mutant Gly117→Arg catalyzed melibiose exchange in the presence of Na+ or Li+, but did not catalyze melibiose translocation involving net flux of the coupling cation, indicating that sugar is released prior to release of the coupling cation. Taken together, the findings are consistent with the notion that Gly117 plays an important role in cation binding and translocation.
Keywords: Na+-coupled transporter, alternating access, ligand binding, ordered-binding model, Na+ binding
The melibiose permease of Salmonella typhimurium (MelBSt) catalyzes cotransport of galactoside with Na+, Li+ or H+.1 MelBSt belongs to the glycoside/pentoside/hexuronide:cation family2, a subgroup of the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) of membrane transport proteins. MelB of Escherichia coli (MelBEc) is the best-studied member among all MelB orthologues.3–14 Recently, MelB homologues in human and mouse (called the major facilitator superfamily domain-containing proteins, MFSD) have been reported.15–17 Among them, MFSD2A protein, which is expressed in many cells, plays a role in adaptive thermogenesis;15 it has been also identified as a human lung tumor suppressor16 and responsible for tunicamycin sensitivity in mammalian cells.17 MFSD2A shares ~15% identity and ~54% similarity of primary sequence with MelBSt, and the positions essential or important for melibiose transport in MelB are functionally conserved in MFSD2A.17
MelB utilizes the free energy from the downhill translocation of one cosubstrate to drive uphill translocation of the other,18–22 and all three cations compete for a common binding pocket.23–25 A previous threading model,13 basing on the crystal structures of a MFS permease, the H+-coupled lactose permease (LacY),26–28 predicts that MelBEc is organized into two pseudo-symmetrical six-helix bundles connected by a long middle loop surrounding an internal cavity facing the cytoplasm. A similar overall fold for other MelB orthologues has also been proposed from threading analysis.13 In contrast to LacY, the residues important for cation binding in MelB are located in the N-terminal helix bundle (Fig. 1), whereas the H+-binding site in LacY is located primarily in the C-terminal helices.28 Based on the location of the sugar-binding site in LacY, the melibiose-binding site is proposed to lie within the internal cavity (Fig. 1).13 This model is consistent with numerous biochemical and biophysical results,11, 29–36 as well as low-resolution EM structures of MelBEc.37, 38 The organization of the protein into two separate helix bundles, as well as the location of cosubstrates, are consistent with the alternating-access transport model, which has been recognized as a fundamental mechanism for many other secondary transporters.26, 39–46
MelBSt shares 86% identity and 96% similarity of primary sequence with MelBEc (Supplemental Information, Fig. S1). All non-conserved and 82% of the conserved variations occur in the C-terminal domain and the middle loop. Bioinformatics analysis suggests that the internal cavities including two cosubstrate-binding sites are well conserved between the two MelB permeases (Fig. 1), implying similarity in function, which is supported by previous studies of melibiose transport and cation binding.1 The docked sugar is surrounded by potential H-bonding partners and aromatic residues (Fig. 1),13 which share common features for sugar binding.41, 47–50 A Na+ has been proposed to bind between helices II and IV13. A large body of experimental data, including those from mutagenesis, biochemistry and FTIR spectroscopy, indicates that the carboxyl groups of conserved Asp55 and Asp59 (helix II) contribute to Na+ binding to MelBEc.14, 29–34 Helix IV is in the center of a charge/H-bond network involved in the binding of the two cosubstrates (Fig. 1).13, 30, 34, 51 Gly117 is in the middle of helix IV, and the carbonyl oxygen may participate in Na+ coordination (Fig. 1).13
We know little about the role of Gly117, but it was observed that the G117D mutation rescued the function of inactive mutant D55S in MelBEc,52 which supports the notion that Gly117 is in close proximity to Asp55.13, 52 In addition, in mutant G117C MelBEc the conformational equilibrium was displaced towards the outward-facing conformation.53 In MelBSt, site-directed mutagenesis has not been used to study the binding sites for cosubstrates so far. In this study, we mutated Gly117 of MelBSt to four different residues--Ala, Pro, Trp or Arg. The effects of the mutations on cosubstrate binding and transport depend on the physical and chemical properties of the side chain. Our studies indicate that Gly117 plays an important role in cation binding and translocation, which is consistent with our threading model.
Materials and Methods
Materials
[1-3H]Melibiose was custom synthesized by PerkinElmer (Boston, MT). The 2'-(N-dansyl)aminoalkyl-1-thio-b-d-galactopyranoside (D2G) was kindly provided by Drs. H. Ronald Kaback and Gérard Leblanc. Monensin and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 2-(4′-maleimidylanilino)-naphthalene-6-sulfonic acid was purchased from Invitrogen. Oligodeoxynucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies. MacConkey agar media (lactose free) was from Difco. All other materials were reagent grade and obtained from commercial sources.
Bacterial strains and plasmids
E. coli DW2 strain (melA+, ΔmelB, ΔlacZY), obtained from Dr. Gérard Leblanc, was used for the functional characterization. E. coli XL1 Blue cells were used for DNA manipulations. The expression plasmid pK95 ΔAH/MelBSt/CHis10,1, 3 which encodes the full length MelBSt with L5→M and a His10-tag at the C-terminus (the wild type) was used as the template. Four individual mutants with residue Ala, Pro, Trp or Arg at position Gly117 were constructed by QuickChange™ Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit from Stratagene. All mutants have been confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Growth of cells and protein overexpression
E. coli DW2 cells (melA+, melB,lacZY) containing a given plasmid were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth with 100 mg/L of ampicillin in a 37-°C shaker overnight. The overnight cultures were diluted by 5% to LB broth supplemented with 0.5% glycerol and 100 mg/L of ampicillin, and constitutive overexpression was obtained by shaking at 30 °C for 5 h.
Preparation of right-side-out (RSO) membrane vesicles
RSO membrane vesicles were prepared from E. coli DW2 cells by osmotic lysis,1, 54, 55 extensively washed and resuspended in 100 mM KPi (pH 7.5) at a protein concentration of ~25–30 mg/ml, frozen in liquid N2, and stored at −80 °C.
Preparation of crude membranes
The 5-hour cultures with the expressed MelBSt were washed with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) once, re-suspended and adjusted with the same buffer to A600 ~20. Approximately 100 μL of cells from each sample were sonicated in an ice-cold water bath (Branson 2510) for 5 min, three times; and centrifuged at 20,816 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (80 μL) was subjected to ultracentrifugation at 384,492 g (TLA-100 rotor, Beckman Optima™ Max Ultracentrifuge) for 20 min; the pellets were resuspended in 70 μL of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5).
SDS-12% PAGE and Western blotting
After protein assay using Micro BCA™ Protein Assay Kit (Pierce), ~15 g of total membranes were loaded onto each well of SDS-12%PAGE. The gel was transferred onto the PVDF membrane by the Trans-Blot Turbo transfer system (Bio-Rad) at 1.3 A, 25 V for 15 min. The blocked PVDF membrane was then reacted with the penta-His horseradish peroxidase conjugate and washed according to the protocols provided in the Penta-His HRP Conjugate Kit (Qiagen). MelBSt proteins were detected using the SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Scientific) after exposing it to the X-ray film (Kodak BioMax XAR film).
[1-3H]Melibiose transport assay
E. coli DW2 cells expressing MelBSt in the absence of melibiose were washed with 50 ml of 100 mM KPi (pH 7.5, so-called Na+-free buffer) twice, followed by washing with 50 ml 100 mM KPi, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgSO4. The cell pellets were resuspended with the latter buffer, adjusted to an A420 = 10 (~0.7 mg protein/ml). Melibiose transport at a final concentration of 0.4 mM and a specific activity of 10 mCi/mmol was assayed as described.1
Melibiose fermentation
The DW2 cells (melA+, ΔmelB, ΔlacZY) were transformed with a given plasmid, plated on MacConkey agar plates35 containing ~100 mM Na+ with supplement of 1–30 mM melibiose (the sole carbohydrate source) and 100 mg/L of ampicillin, and incubated at 37 °C. After 18 h, the plates were viewed and photographed immediately.
Melibiose efflux and exchange
RSO membrane vesicles containing MelBSt in 100 mM KPi, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgSO4 were concentrated to 25–30 mg/ml, and pre-equilibrated overnight on ice with melibiose (20 mM, 10 mCi/mmol), 0.75 μM monensin, and 10 μM CCCP22, in the absence or presence 20 mM NaCl or LiCl. Aliquots (2 μL) were diluted 200 fold into a given buffer in the absence (efflux) or presence (exchange) of 20 mM unlabeled melibiose, and reactions were terminated by dilution and rapid filtration at a given time.1
FRET (Trp→D2G)
Fluorescence was measured with an AMINCO-Bowman Series 2 Spectrometer. Steady-state measurements were performed in a 3-mm quartz cuvette (Starna Cells, Inc) with RSO membrane vesicles at a protein concentration of ~0.5 mg/ml in 100 mM KPi, pH 7.5. With excitation wavelength at 290 nm, the FRET intensity was recorded for 60 sec at 500 nm with slit widths of 2 mm for both excitation and emission.
Determination of apparent cation-stimulation constants (K0.5Na+ and K0.5Li+) of the D2G FRET
NaCl or LiCl was consecutively added into a 3-mm quartz cuvette containing RSO vesicles after an addition of 10 μM D2G (a KD value for the WT). Water at identical volume was used for the control. The FRET signals were recorded for 60 sec at each condition and mean values were used for further calculation. The increase in intensity (ΔINa+ or Li+), the difference before (I0) and after successive additions of cation solution (INa+ or Li+), was expressed as the percentage of the I0 (ΔINa+ or Li+/I0). FRET stimulation at each cation concentration was corrected by subtracting corresponding Iwater/I0 value, and then plotted as a function of Na+ or Li+ concentration. The K0.5Na+ or Li+ values are determined by fitting the data to a hyperbolic function.
Determination of the melibiose concentration corresponding to half-maximal displacement of bound D2G (IC50)
Melibiose was added stepwise to a 3-mm quartz cuvette containing RSO vesicles after the additions with D2G (10 μM) and NaCl or LiCl (20 mM or 200 mM) until no change occurred in fluorescence emission at 500 nm. An identical volume of water was added at each point as a negative control. FRET signals were recorded for 60 sec after each addition, and mean values were calculated. The decrease in intensity after each addition of melibiose (ΔFMel) was corrected by subtracting the emission change obtained with water (ΔFwater), and plotted as a function of melibiose concentration. The IC50 values were determined by fitting the data to a hyperbolic function.
RESULTS
Construction and protein expression of Gly117 mutants
Gly at position 117 in MelBSt was changed by site-directed mutagenesis to four different residues: Ala (small volume); Pro (a helix destabilizer); Trp (aromatic ring); or Arg (positive charge). Membrane proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and the proteins were detected by both silver nitrate and Western blot using anti-His antibody (Supplemental Fig. S2). Compared to the WT, most of the mutants had similar levels of membrane expression, with the exception of G117R, which had a reduced expression.
Melibiose active transport in intact cells
In a nominally Na+-free buffer, the WT catalyzes melibiose transport at an almost linear rate for 15 s to 80 nmol/mg protein at 2 min (Fig. 2), which was significantly stimulated by Na+ or Li+ as shown previously.1, 56 Addition of the protonophore CCCP abolished transport, indicating that the primary driving force for transport is the electrochemical H+ gradient. Furthermore, when unlabeled melibiose was added at each time point during transport, with a10-min incubation prior to the filtration, the entire internal pool of melibiose was exchanged with extracellular melibiose (Supplemental Information, Fig. S3). Thus, there is little or no hydrolysis or chemical alteration of the accumulated intracellular melibiose.
The mutant G117A catalyzed Na+- or Li+-dependent melibiose transport similar to the WT (Fig. 2) with somewhat lower H+-coupled transport activity (i.e., in the absence of Na+ or Li+). All other mutants (P, W or R) exhibited H+-coupled melibiose transport at a level indistinguishable from CCCP-treated WT or non-transformed DW2 cells, and showed no response to addition of Na+ or Li+.
Melibiose fermentation
On MacConkey agar plates containing 1–30 mM melibiose, untransformed DW-2 cells formed pale/white colonies with a translucent background, denoting little or no melibiose translocation across the membranes. At >10 mM melibiose, DW2 cells, containing the chromosome-encoded α-galactosidase and recombinantly overexpressing WT MelBSt, formed magenta colonies on a hazy background indicating melibiose fermentation and therefore downhill melibiose influx catalyzed by MelBSt (Fig. 3). At 5 mM melibiose, few colonies were pink, whereas at 2.5 mM or lower, the colonies were pale yellow/brown. Mutant G117A exhibited similar color to WT. Mutant G117P exhibited red or pink colonies only at high concentrations of melibiose, indicating limited melibiose influx and fermentation. Mutants G117R and G117W formed colonies that were indistinguishable from untransformed cells even at 30 mM melibiose, indicating no fermentation.
Melibiose efflux and exchange
In the absence of Na+ or Li+, RSO membrane vesicles containing WT MelBSt exhibited a slow rate of melibiose efflux down a concentration gradient and a slightly faster rate of equilibrium exchange (Fig. 4). Whereas the efflux rate was stimulated by Na+ or Li+, the exchange rate was enhanced by Na+ but inhibited by Li+.1 In the presence of Na+, 96% of the intravesicular melibiose exchanged with the extracellular unlabeled melibiose within 5 min (data not shown). Consistent with the results in intact cells, little or no melibiose hydrolysis occurred within the RSO vesicles.
The G117W mutant did not catalyze either melibiose efflux or exchange in the presence of H+, Na+ or Li+. The G117P mutant catalyzed significantly reduced rates of efflux and exchange. Strikingly, mutant G117R exhibited little or no efflux but catalyzed a relatively fast rate of exchange in the presence of Na+ or Li+, but not H+.
K0.5Na+ or K0.5Li+ for D2G FRET
FRET from endogenous Trp residues to the dansyl moiety of bound D2G has been demonstrated with MelBEc4, 57 and MelBSt.1 Thus, WT MelBSt exhibits FRET upon the addition of D2G, which is stimulated by addition of Na+ or Li+ and reversed by melibiose. The difference in intensity observed before and after melibiose addition reflects the D2G bound specifically to MelBSt. At saturating Na+ or Li+, the WT MelBSt exhibits Kd for D2G of ~10 μM.1 The Na+ or Li+ enhancement of FRET (difference in intensity before and after cation addition, ΔINa+ or Li+) results from combined effects of an increase of D2G binding per se and a conformational change (distance and/or environment) induced by Na+ or Li+ binding.1, 4 Mutations may affect Na+- or Li+-induced intensities by (a) decreasing the binding affinity for either or both cosubstrates, and/or (b) modifying the micro-environment surrounding donor Trp residue(s), and/or (c) restricting the conformational change. Thus, the same concentrations of Na+- or Li+-bound ternary complex from different mutants may not yield the same ΔI/I0 value.
In order to quantify cation binding to MelBSt mutants, ΔINa+ or Li+ /I0 was measured as a function of Na+ or Li+ concentration (Fig. 5, upper panels). The stimulation constants (K0.5Na+ and K0.5Li+) for D2G FRET in WT MelBSt were 0.9 mM and 1.5 mM, respectively, and the mutant G117A yielded similar values (Table 1). K0.5Na+ and K0.5Li+ values for G117P were 25-and 6-fold higher than those for the WT, respectively. With mutant G117R, both K0.5 values increased by 12 fold. The K0.5Li+ for G117W was only 2.5-fold higher than obtained for WT, but no Na+ stimulation was observed even at 500 mM (data not shown). In all three mutants, the maximum stimulations by Na+ or Li+ were largely reduced implying that either the micro-environment and/or distance between D2G and donors are changed, or that the number of bound D2G molecules is reduced by lower sugar affinity. In either case, the constant (K0.5Na+ or Li+) reflects the cation-binding affinity.
Table 1.
WT | G117A | G117W | G117P | G117R | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Na+ | 0.9 | 1.7 | /a | 23.2 | 11.2 |
Li+ | 1.5 | 0.97 | 3.6 | 9.5 | 17.2 |
not determined due to weak signals.
IC50 for melibiose displacement of bound D2G
In order to quantify melibiose binding to MelBSt, 10 μM D2G, Na+ or Li+, and then the titrate melibiose were consecutively added to RSO vesicles. IC50 values for WT MelBSt of 3.8 mM or 1.7 mM were observed at 20 mM Na+ or Li+, respectively, and 2.2 mM or 1.8 mM at 200 mM Na+ or Li+, respectively (Fig. 5, bottom panels; Table 2). The IC50 for mutant G117A was about 2-fold higher than that of the WT at 20 mM Na+ or Li+. In the presence of 20 mM or 200 mM of Li+, IC50 values for mutant G117W were 50 mM or 14.1 mM, respectively, and for mutant G117P were 11.3 mM or 7.5 mM, respectively. Mutant G117R exhibited IC50 of 5.6 mM or 4.7 mM in the presence of 200 mM Na+ or Li+. FRET intensities for mutants G117W or P, with Na+ as the cosubstrate, were too weak to allow the determination of IC50 value.
Table 2.
WT | G117A | G117W | G117P | G117R | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Na+ | 20 mM | 3.8 | 8.1 | /a | / | / |
200 mM | 2.2 | -b | / | / | 5.6 | |
Li+ | 20 mM | 1.7 | 3.4 | 50.0 | 11.3 | / |
200 mM | 1.8 | - | 14.1 | 7.5 | 4.7 |
not determined due to weak signals.
not determined
DISCUSSION
An ordered-binding model for cation/melibiose symport in MelBEc has been suggested.11, 13, 14 An extended model for the melibiose efflux mechanism is proposed for MelBSt here (Fig. 6). In this simplified scheme, melibiose efflux down a sugar concentration gradient consists of 8 steps (black solid arrows): [Step-1, Na+-bound inward-facing state, or PI:Na+ state] Binding of a Na+ to the inward-facing conformer; [Step-2, Na+- and melibiose-bound inward-facing state, or P1:Na+ :Mel state] Binding of a melibiose from the cytoplasmic cavity; [Step-3, occluded Na+-and melibiose-bound state, or P:(Na+:Mel) state] Formation of a ternary-complex intermediate that is occluded on both sides; [Step-4, Na+- and melibiose-bound outward-facing state, or P0:Na+ :Mel state] Opening of the periplasmic cavity; [Step-5, Na+-bound outward-facing state, or P0:Na+ state] Release of the melibiose at the outer surface; [Step-6, empty outward-facing state, or PO:empty state] Release of Na+ from an outward-facing conformer; [Step-7, occluded empty state, or P:(empty) state] Formation of an unloaded intermediate occluded on both sides; [Step-8, empty inward-facing state, or PI:empty state] Opening of the cytoplasmic cavity. The melibiose efflux involves the whole cycle, and melibiose exchange reaction involves only steps 1–5.
Previously, we have experimentally determined1 that the extracellular release of cation is the rate-limiting step for melibiose efflux catalyzed by MelBSt, and melibiose is released from MelBSt extracellularly prior to the release of Na+. These results are consistent with what observed in MelBEc.22 Here, we provide further evidence to support this notion. Cells expressing mutant G117R neither ferment melibiose nor catalyze melibiose active transport or efflux. Remarkably, however, this mutant catalyzes Na+- or Li+- but not H+-coupled equilibrium exchange. Thus, in the presence of 20 mM melibiose and Na+ or Li+ on both sides of the membrane, the mutant can undergo the global conformational change involved in an alternating access-type mechanism but is defective in releasing Na+ or Li+ (Fig. 6, step 6), implying that Gly117 plays an important role in the cation translocation mechanism. This behavior of mutant G117R, similar to that of E325A LacY58; 59, strongly supports the ordered-binding mechanism as postulated (Fig. 6).
The rate of exchange is believed to correlate with the binding affinity. Accordingly, at saturating Na+ or Li+ concentration, the IC50 for melibiose displacement of bound D2G exhibits only a 2.5-fold increase (Table 2). If we assume that the mutation has a similar effect on D2G and melibiose, then it can be estimated that the apparent binding constant (Kd) for melibiose is increased by less than 4 fold, implying that sugar binding is only slightly affected by the Arg at position 117, and therefore Gly117 may not coordinate melibiose directly.
In WT MelBSt, we have been observed previously1 that Li+ stimulates melibiose efflux and an outwardly directed Li+ gradient increases exchange; however, at equal Li+ concentrations on both sides of the membrane, the melibiose exchange rate is slower than the efflux rate. In MelBEc,22,60 Li+ also inhibits melibiose exchange, but not methyl-β-d-thiogalactoside exchange. Although the mechanism of inhibition is still not clear, it is possible that MelB/Li+/melibiose complexes favor an occluded state (Fig. 6, step 3) in which there is no exchange between free and bound sugars.1 In the presence of Li+, the Gly117→R mutation inhibits melibiose efflux but stimulates exchange at a rate even faster than that obtained with WT MelBSt. It is likely that the mutation may decrease the stability of the MelB/Li+/melibiose complexes at step 3, thus facilitating melibiose exchange at a rate similar to that obtained in the presence of Na+.
Six of eight endogenous Trp residues are located in the N-terminal helix bundle. Trp64 (helix II) and Trp299 (IX) of MelBEc are responsible for 80% of the D2G FRET, and apparently Trp116 does not contribute significantly to the FRET.25 Thus, it seems unlikely that the inserted Trp at position 117 could serve as an efficient FRET donor or significantly quench the Trp64 and Trp299 emission directly. Mutant G117W specifically blocked Na+-induced D2G FRET (ΔI), but the apparent affinity for Li+ did not change significantly (< 3-fold increase in K0.5Li+, Table 1). Thus, lack of Na+-induced D2G FRET (ΔI) may be mainly due to a large decrease in Na+ binding.
While in most Gly117 mutants there are reductions in binding of Na+, Li+ and melibiose, the effect on Na+ binding is more severe than those on Li+ and melibiose. The MelB orthologue of Klebsiella pneumoniae (MelBKp) couples melibiose transport with H+ and Li+ but not Na+.61 It has been demonstrated that Asn58, which is adjacent to Asp59, is important for Na+ recognition, and MelBKp has Ala at position 58.31 It seems likely that selective elimination of Na+ binding in MelB could be achieved by a minor modification around the cation-binding site. In addition, the effective inhibition of melibiose binding in mutant G117W (Table 2) may be due to a steric effect of the bulky side chain, which may also partially account for the effects of other mutations on sugar binding.
Gly is known to destabilize α-helices, and the replacement with Pro, another α-helix destabilizer that may alter the tilt in helix IV, partially inhibits both efflux and exchange reactions, as well as impairs affinity for the cosubstrates to a similar extent. Thus, the data support the notion that the melibiose/cation symport mechanism requires precise positioning of helix IV.
If the carbonyl oxygen at position 117 is a part of the cation-binding site, then a small neutral replacement should not have a significant effect. Accordingly, placement of Ala at position 117 has little or no effect on Na+- or Li+-coupled melibiose transport (Fig. 2) or the apparent affinity for Na+, Li+ or melibiose (Tables 1 & 2). Taken as a whole, our findings show that the placement of Arg or Trp at position 117 abolishes melibiose uphill transport, efflux, and fermentation; G117R and P greatly decrease apparent affinities for Na+ and Li+. Remarkably, the mutant G117R retains significant sugar affinity and catalyzes melibiose exchange, a partial reaction, with bound Na+ or Li+, but does not catalyze melibiose translocation involving net flux of the coupling cation. In conclusion, Gly117 plays an important role in cation binding and translocation of MelBST, which is consistent with our threading structure.13
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Drs. Gérard Leblanc, Klaus Fendler, Luis Reuss, and H. Ronald Kaback for materials, critical reading, and helpful discussions; Drs. Hariharan Parameswaran and Anowarul Amin for reading of this manuscript; Ms. Shailika Nurva and Dr. Mohammad Yousef for their excellent technical support in the earlier stages of this project. SVJ & YS, Master student interns from Center for Biotechnology and Genomics at Texas Tech University; AAH, undergraduate student at TTU.
This work was supported by Texas Norman Hackerman Advanced Research Program 010674-0034-2009, National Institutes of Health Grants R01 GM095538, and R21HL087895-02S1 to L.G.
ABBREVIATIONS
- MelBSt
melibiose permease of Salmonella typhimurium
- MelBEc
MelB of Escherichia coli
- LacY
lactose permease of E. coli
- melA
gene encoding α-galactosidase
- LB broth
Luria-Bertani broth
- D2G
2'-(N-dansyl)aminoalkyl-1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside
- CCCP
carbonylcyanide-m-chlorophenylhydrazone
- K0.5Na+ or Li+
the Na+ or Li+ stimulation constant for D2G FRET
- IC50
the melibiose concentration corresponding to half-maximal displacement of bound D2G.
Footnotes
SUPPORTING INFORMATION Conservation between MelBSt and MelBEc, SDS-PAGE analysis and western blotting, as well as melibiose exchange with intact cells are available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
REFERENCES
- (1).Guan L, Nurva S, Ankeshwarapu SP. Mechanism of melibiose/cation symport of the melibiose permease of Salmonella typhimurium. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:6367–6374. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.206227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Saier MH., Jr. Families of transmembrane sugar transport proteins. Mol Microbiol. 2000;35:699–710. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Pourcher T, Leclercq S, Brandolin G, Leblanc G. Melibiose permease of Escherichia coli: large scale purification and evidence that H+, Na+, and Li+ sugar symport is catalyzed by a single polypeptide. Biochemistry. 1995;34:4412–4420. doi: 10.1021/bi00013a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Maehrel C, Cordat E, Mus-Veteau I, Leblanc G. Structural studies of the melibiose permease of Escherichia coli by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. I. Evidence for ion-induced conformational change. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:33192–33197. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Ganea C, Pourcher T, Leblanc G, Fendler K. Evidence for intraprotein charge transfer during the transport activity of the melibiose permease from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 2001;40:13744–13752. doi: 10.1021/bi011223k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Ding PZ, Wilson TH. The effect of modifications of the charged residues in the transmembrane helices on the transport activity of the melibiose carrier of Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;285:348–354. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Leon X, Lorenz-Fonfria VA, Lemonnier R, Leblanc G, Padros E. Substrate-induced conformational changes of melibiose permease from Escherichia coli studied by infrared difference spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 2005;44:3506–3514. doi: 10.1021/bi048301z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Abdel-Dayem M, Basquin C, Pourcher T, Cordat E, Leblanc G. Cytoplasmic loop connecting helices IV and V of the melibiose permease from Escherichia coli is involved in the process of Na+-coupled sugar translocation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:1518–1524. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210053200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Leon X, Lemonnier R, Leblanc G, Padros E. Changes in secondary structures and acidic side chains of melibiose permease upon cosubstrates binding. Biophys J. 2006;91:4440–4449. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.090241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Garcia-Celma JJ, Dueck B, Stein M, Schlueter M, Meyer-Lipp K, Leblanc G, Fendler K. Rapid activation of the melibiose permease MelB immobilized on a solid-supported membrane. Langmuir. 2008;24:8119–8126. doi: 10.1021/la800428h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Meyer-Lipp K, Sery N, Ganea C, Basquin C, Fendler K, Leblanc G. The inner interhelix loop 4–5 of the melibiose permease from Escherichia coli takes part in conformational changes after sugar binding. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:25882–25892. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601259200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Leon X, Leblanc G, Padros E. Alteration of sugar-induced conformational changes of the melibiose permease by mutating Arg141 in loop 4–5. Biophys J. 2009;96:4877–4886. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Yousef MS, Guan L. A 3D structure model of the melibiose permease of Escherichia coli represents a distinctive fold for Na+ symporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:15291–15296. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905516106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Granell M, Leon X, Leblanc G, Padros E, Lorenz-Fonfria VA. Structural insights into the activation mechanism of melibiose permease by sodium binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:22078–22083. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008649107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Angers M, Uldry M, Kong D, Gimble JM, Jetten AM. Mfsd2a encodes a novel major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein highly induced in brown adipose tissue during fasting and adaptive thermogenesis. Biochemical J. 2008;416:347–355. doi: 10.1042/BJ20080165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Spinola M, Falvella FS, Colombo F, Sullivan JP, Shames DS, Girard L, Spessotto P, Minna JD, Dragani TA. MFSD2A is a novel lung tumor suppressor gene modulating cell cycle and matrix attachment. Molecular Cancer. 2010;9:62. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Reiling JH, Clish CB, Carette JE, Varadarajan M, Brummelkamp TR, Sabatini DM. From the Cover: Feature Article: A haploid genetic screen identifies the major facilitator domain containing 2A (MFSD2A) transporter as a key mediator in the response to tunicamycin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:11756–11765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018098108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Wilson DM, Wilson TH. Cation specificity for sugar substrates of the melibiose carrier in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987;904:191–200. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(87)90368-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Tokuda H, Kaback HR. Sodium-dependent methyl 1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside transport in membrane vesicles isolated from Salmonella typhimurium. Biochemistry. 1977;16:2130–2136. doi: 10.1021/bi00629a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Tokuda H, Kaback HR. Sodium-dependent binding of p-nitrophenyl alpha-d-galactopyranoside to membrane vesicles isolated from Salmonella typhimurium. Biochemistry. 1978;17:698–705. doi: 10.1021/bi00597a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Tsuchiya T, Raven J, Wilson TH. Co-transport of Na+ and methul-beta-d-thiogalactopyranoside mediated by the melibiose transport system of Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1977;76:26–31. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(77)91663-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Bassilana M, Pourcher T, Leblanc G. Facilitated diffusion properties of melibiose permease in Escherichia coli membrane vesicles. Release of co-substrates is rate limiting for permease cycling. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:16865–16870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Lopilato J, Tsuchiya T, Wilson TH. Role of Na+ and Li+ in thiomethylgalactoside transport by the melibiose transport system of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1978;134:147–156. doi: 10.1128/jb.134.1.147-156.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Damiano-Forano E, Bassilana M, Leblanc G. Sugar binding properties of the melibiose permease in Escherichia coli membrane vesicles. Effects of Na+ and H+ concentrations. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:6893–6899. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Mus-Veteau I, Pourcher T, Leblanc G. Melibiose permease of Escherichia coli: substrate-induced conformational changes monitored by tryptophan fluorescence spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1995;34:6775–6783. doi: 10.1021/bi00020a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Abramson J, Smirnova I, Kasho V, Verner G, Kaback HR, Iwata S. Structure and mechanism of the lactose permease of Escherichia coli. Science. 2003;301:610–615. doi: 10.1126/science.1088196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Mirza O, Guan L, Verner G, Iwata S, Kaback HR. Structural evidence for induced fit and a mechanism for sugar/H+ symport in LacY. EMBO J. 2006;25:1177–1183. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Guan L, Mirza O, Verner G, Iwata S, Kaback HR. Structural determination of wild-type lactose permease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:15294–15298. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707688104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Pourcher T, Deckert M, Bassilana M, Leblanc G. Melibiose permease of Escherichia coli: mutation of aspartic acid 55 in putative helix II abolishes activation of sugar binding by Na+ ions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;178:1176–1181. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(91)91016-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Pourcher T, Zani ML, Leblanc G. Mutagenesis of acidic residues in putative membrane-spanning segments of the melibiose permease of Escherichia coli. I. Effect on Na(+)-dependent transport and binding properties. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:3209–3215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Hama H, Wilson TH. Replacement of alanine 58 by asparagine enables the melibiose carrier of Klebsiella pneumoniae to couple sugar transport to Na+ J Biol Chem. 1994;269:1063–1067. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Matsuzaki S, Weissborn AC, Tamai E, Tsuchiya T, Wilson TH. Melibiose carrier of Escherichia coli: use of cysteine mutagenesis to identify the amino acids on the hydrophilic face of transmembrane helix 2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1420:63–72. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(99)00087-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Zani ML, Pourcher T, Leblanc G. Mutagenesis of acidic residues in putative membrane-spanning segments of the melibiose permease of Escherichia coli. II. Effect on cationic selectivity and coupling properties. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:3216–3221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Zani ML, Pourcher T, Leblanc G. Mutation of polar and charged residues in the hydrophobic NH2-terminal domains of the melibiose permease of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:24883–24889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Franco PJ, Wilson TH. Arg-52 in the melibiose carrier of Escherichia coli is important for cation-coupled sugar transport and participates in an intrahelical salt bridge. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:6377–6386. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.20.6377-6386.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Franco PJ, Jena AB, Wilson TH. Physiological evidence for an interaction between helices II and XI in the melibiose carrier of Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1510:231–242. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(00)00353-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Hacksell I, Rigaud JL, Purhonen P, Pourcher T, Hebert H, Leblanc G. Projection structure at 8 A resolution of the melibiose permease, an Na-sugar co-transporter from Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 2002;21:3569–3574. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Purhonen P, Lundback AK, Lemonnier R, Leblanc G, Hebert H. Three-dimensional structure of the sugar symporter melibiose permease from cryo-electron microscopy. J Struct Biol. 2005;152:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Huang Y, Lemieux MJ, Song J, Auer M, Wang DN. Structure and mechanism of the glycerol-3-phosphate transporter from Escherichia coli. Science. 2003;301:616–620. doi: 10.1126/science.1087619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Gouaux E, Mackinnon R. Principles of selective ion transport in channels and pumps. Science. 2005;310:1461–1465. doi: 10.1126/science.1113666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Oldham ML, Khare D, Quiocho FA, Davidson AL, Chen J. Crystal structure of a catalytic intermediate of the maltose transporter. Nature. 2007;450:515–521. doi: 10.1038/nature06264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Forrest LR, Zhang YW, Jacobs MT, Gesmonde J, Xie L, Honig BH, Rudnick G. Mechanism for alternating access in neurotransmitter transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:10338–10343. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804659105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Law CJ, Maloney PC, Wang DN. Ins and outs of major facilitator superfamily antiporters. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008;62:289–305. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Khare D, Oldham ML, Orelle C, Davidson AL, Chen J. Alternating access in maltose transporter mediated by rigid-body rotations. Mol Cell. 2009;33:528–536. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Abramson J, Wright EM. Structure and function of Na(+)-symporters with inverted repeats. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009;19:425–432. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (46).Kaback HR, Smirnova I, Kasho V, Nie Y, Zhou Y. The alternating access transport mechanism in LacY. J Membr Biol. 2011;239:85–93. doi: 10.1007/s00232-010-9327-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Sixma TK, Pronk SE, Kalk KH, van Zanten BA, Berghuis AM, Hol WG. Lactose binding to heat-labile enterotoxin revealed by X-ray crystallography. Nature. 1992;355:561–564. doi: 10.1038/355561a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Duan X, Quiocho FA. Structural evidence for a dominant role of nonpolar interactions in the binding of a transport/chemosensory receptor to its highly polar ligands. Biochemistry. 2002;41:706–712. doi: 10.1021/bi015784n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Guan L, Hu Y, Kaback HR. Aromatic stacking in the sugar binding site of the lactose permease. Biochemistry. 2003;42:1377–1382. doi: 10.1021/bi027152m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Faham S, Watanabe A, Besserer GM, Cascio D, Specht A, Hirayama BA, Wright EM, Abramson J. The crystal structure of a sodium galactose transporter reveals mechanistic insights into Na+/sugar symport. Science. 2008;321:810–814. doi: 10.1126/science.1160406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).Cordat E, Leblanc G, Mus-Veteau I. Evidence for a role of helix IV in connecting cation- and sugar-binding sites of Escherichia coli melibiose permease. Biochemistry. 2000;39:4493–4499. doi: 10.1021/bi991852i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Wilson DM, Hama H, Wilson TH. GLY113-->ASP can restore activity to the ASP51-->SER mutant in the melibiose carrier of Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;209:242–249. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Ganea C, Meyer-Lipp K, Lemonnier R, Krah A, Leblanc G, Fendler K. G117C MelB, a mutant melibiose permease with a changed conformational equilibrium. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1808:2508–2516. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (54).Kaback HR. Bacterial Membranes. In: Kaplan NP, Jakoby WB, Colowick NP, editors. Methods in Enzymol. Elsevier; New York: 1971. pp. 99–120. [Google Scholar]
- (55).Short SA, Kaback HR, Kohn LD. D-lactate dehydrogenase binding in Escherichia coli dld- membrane vesicles reconstituted for active transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974;71:1461–1465. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (56).Niiya S, Moriyama Y, Futai M, Tsuchiya T. Cation coupling to melibiose transport in Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1980;144:192–199. doi: 10.1128/jb.144.1.192-199.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (57).Cordat E, Mus-Veteau I, Leblanc G. Structural studies of the melibiose permease of Escherichia coli by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. II. Identification of the tryptophan residues acting as energy donors. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:33198–33202. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (58).Carrasco N, Antes LM, Poonian MS, Kaback HR. lac permease of Escherichia coli: histidine-322 and glutamic acid-325 may be components of a charge-relay system. Biochemistry. 1986;25:4486–4488. doi: 10.1021/bi00364a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (59).Guan L, Kaback HR. Lessons from lactose permease. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2006;35:67–91. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.102005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (60).Bassilana M, Pourcher T, Leblanc G. Melibiose permease of Escherichia coli. Characteristics of co-substrates release during facilitated diffusion reactions. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:9663–9667. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (61).Hama H, Wilson TH. Cation-coupling in chimeric melibiose carriers derived from Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The amino-terminal portion is crucial for Na+ recognition in melibiose transport. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:10060–10065. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.