Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2012;21(2):253–262.

Trends in Chinese Snacking Behaviors and Patterns and the Social-Demographic Role between 1991 and 2009

Zhihong Wang 1,2, Fengying Zhai 2, Bing Zhang 2, Barry M Popkin 1
PMCID: PMC3335772  NIHMSID: NIHMS326249  PMID: 22507613

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamic shifts in snacking behaviors and patterns in China. Using four waves (1991, 2004, 2006, and 2009) from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) with full socioeconomic and demographic data and 3-day, 24-hour dietary recall data, 45,402 individuals age two and older were studied. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to examine the association of social-demographic factors on snacking behaviors. Results show that snacking prevalence, frequency of daily snacking occasions, and percentage of total daily energy intake (EI) from snacks increased significantly across all ages between 1991 and 2009, with a dramatic increase after 2004. Snacking was much more prevalent among children and higher-income, urban, and educated populations over time. Evening was the preferred snacking occasion, and the proportion of total daily EI from snacks varied between 4.1% and 12.3% for all snackers by age. Fruits, grains, and beverages were the most popular snacks and the highest contributors to snacking EI over all age groups. A marked transition from a tradition of two or three meals per day toward meals combined with snacks is underway. Further research is needed to develop a better understanding of the nutritional implications of Chinese snacking behaviors.

Keywords: Snacking behaviors, snacking patterns, Chinese, social-demographic factors, trend

INTRODUCTION

A number of major dietary behavior shifts have been noted across the globe. Snacking is one shift that has received extensive attention partially because of the large amounts of salt, sugar, and fats consumed in snack foods in some countries. Also some scholars note that snacking behavior is linked with obesity, although this relationship is inconsistent across studies.118 An increased number of daily snacking occasions,1922 preferences for high-energy-density and low-nutrient-content snack foods (cakes, cookies, savory snacks, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, etc.),1, 9, 17, 23, 24 increased portion sizes of snack foods,1 a lack of compensation for energy intake (EI) from snack consumption,17 and a passive overconsumption due to less satiation from liquid snacks25 all pose the risk of overweight and obesity.

Recent literature systematically examines the long-term trends of snacking behaviors and snacking patterns among the US population in 1997–1998 and 2003–2006.21, 22 It documents an increase in snacking prevalence (from 71% to 97% for adults and 78% to 94% for children), an increase in the frequency of snacking occasions (an increase of 0.97 events for adults), and an increase in the contribution of snacks to total EI (24% for adults and 27% for children in 2003–2006). Salty snacks, desserts, candy, and sweetened beverages are the major sources of energy from snacks. Selected studies from other developed countries have explored the current status or trends in snacking behaviors and patterns.1, 2023, 26, 27

Dietary intake patterns, levels of obesity, and related cardiometabolic problems are rapidly changing in China.2831 Large shifts in the structure of the Chinese diet have been shown in many studies. These shifts include increases in edible oils and animal-source foods, reductions in grains and vegetables,3234 and increases in fried foods.35 A few studies have examined child and adolescent snacking behaviors.3638 One study suggests that fruit was a major component of snacking in children ages 6 to 18 between 1991 and 1997.37 Studies have not examined snacking behaviors in depth and have not focused on the overall nutritional impact of snacking.

This paper investigates trends in Chinese snacking prevalence between 1991 and 2009 and the social-demographic impacts on snacking behaviors. Further, it examines shifts in snacking patterns among Chinese snackers, including average daily snacking occasions, contribution of snacks to total EI, and types of foods consumed as snacks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and sample

The study uses four waves of data collected in 1991, 2004, 2006, and 2009 by the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). Initiated in 1989, the CHNS, an ongoing open cohort, was designed as to examine how the socioeconomic transformation of Chinese communities and society affects the eating behaviors and nutritional status of the Chinese population. Detailed information on the CHNS has been described previously.3841 Of the 45,402 individuals age two and older with full socioeconomic status (SES) and demographic data and 3-day, 24-hour dietary recall data, 12,504 participated in 1991; 11,126 in 2004;10,526 in 2006; and 11,246 in 2009. Ethical approval was provided by the Internal Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Chinese Center for Disease Control.

Dietary data

Detailed dietary data were collected over three consecutive days by a combination of weighing household intake of all ingredients and creating household-specific recipes for all dishes and three consecutive 24-hour dietary recall interviews. The measurement of energy has been validated by double-labeled water to be highly reliable.42 Variability is low, and the three-day dietary intake at the individual level has been found to be a strong measure of usual intake.43 Methods for dealing with the measurement of condiments and oils added at the household level are quite precise.40, 44 In the interviews, each respondent was asked the location of the eating event, the location of food preparation, the type of food preparation, and the foods consumed. The key child caretaker provided data for children under age ten.

Definitions of “snack,” “snack occasion,” and “snacker”

“Snacks” refer to all foods and drinks consumed outside the context of the three main meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) and are referred to as morning, afternoon, and evening snacks, which make up the “snack occasions.” Due to the lack of the specific time for each event, late-night snacks or multiple snacking events during the morning, afternoon, or evening could not be determined. A person is defined as a “snacker” if he or she consumes any snack during the three days investigated in this study.

Food grouping system

Based on the food grouping system established by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Institute of Nutrition and Food Hygiene in China, we categorized foods into eight main food groups: grains, cereals, beans, and nuts and their products; vegetables; fruits; animal foods; beverages; candy, sugar, and other high-sugar foods; fast foods; and others. A Chinese food composition table was used to calculate EI. The proportion of snackers consuming each main food group and each food group’s contribution to snacking EI were calculated over three-day periods between 1991 and 2009 by age group. Moreover, the top five food groups with big changes were categorized into relevant subgroups given their health implications. For example, fruits are divided into fresh or canned fruits and dried fruits, and beverages include alcoholic beverages, calorically sweetened beverages, low-calorie beverages, and milk beverages. The subgroups high-fat cakes (defined as>10 grams of fat per 100 grams of food) and low-fat cakes in the main group grains, cereals, beans, and nuts and their products are important concerns.

Socioeconomic and demographic data

For each survey year, the variable “age” was divided into five categories: 2–6.9 years, 7–12.9 years, 13–18.9 years, 19–44.9 years, and ≥45 years. A refined measure of urbanicity on a continuum was used instead of an urban-rural dichotomous classification to present change in urbanization over time.45 Deflated family income per capita was categorized into tertiles (i.e., low, medium, and high income). Education was dichotomized into low level (six years of education or less) and high level (more than six years of education) according to the number of years of attendance at formal schools. Most likely the household head preparing food made food choices for children through age 18, therefore the education of the household head preparing food was used for children through age 18.

Statistical analysis

The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to assess shifts in snacking prevalence by age group from 1991 to 2009, and then multiple comparisons tests with Bonferroni adjustment were performed to examine the significance of the difference in snacking prevalence between any two survey years. Pooling the data from 1991 and 2009 and introducing a time indicator variable to indicate the survey year, we conducted logistic regression analysis to examine the association between social-demographic factors and snacking behavior. A likelihood ratio test was used to assess time-income, time-education, and income-education interaction. Analysis of variance/analysis of covariance, adjusting total EI, and then multiple comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment were used to test the significance of change in the percentage of EI from snacks and the shift in the average number of daily snacking occasions over time. Contribution of food groups to snacking energy was examined by chi-square test. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.2 statistical software, and significance levels of p-value<0.05 were used.

RESULTS

There were significant shifts (p<0.05) in age group and education level distribution between 1991 and 2009 (Table 1). Except for an insignificant change for children ages 2–6 and 7–12 between 1991 and 2004, the crude snacking prevalence over a three-day period increased (p<0.05) significantly in all age groups, with a dramatic rise occurring after 2004(Figure 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of Chinese population age 2 and older from 1991, 2004, 2006, and 2009 surveys

1991 2004 2006 2009
Sample size 12,504 11,126 10,526 11,246
Age distribution (%)*
 2–6y 9.8 3.6 3.5 3.8
 7–12y 11.8 6.6 5.4 5.8
 13–18y 10.7 7.5 5.0 4.2
 19–44y 42.2 35.0 35.1 32.5
 ≥45y 25.4 47.4 50.9 53.7
Female (%) 51.0 51.3 51.6 51.1
Urbanicity (median) 43.9 59.0 62.6 64.1
Income/capita distribution(%)
 Low 33.1 33.5 32.7 33.2
 Medium 34.8 33.8 34.5 33.3
 High 32.2 32.6 32.8 33.5
Education distribution(%)*
 Low (≤6 years) 52.7 38.1 41.3 42.8
 High (>6 years) 47.3 61.9 58.7 57.2
*

p<0.05, chi-square test for each kind of socio-demographic characteristic by survey years

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Percentage of Chinese population consuming snacks over a 3-day period, 1991–2009, p-trend<0.001 and multiple comparison with Bonferroni adjustment p<0.05

ano significant difference

Logistic regression analysis found that income level, education level, and unbanicity were positively associated with snacking prevalence (p<0.001). Snacking was much more prevalent among children and females (p<0.001). Income-time interaction increased the risk of snacking (p<0.001), while time-education and income-education interactions were not significant (p>0.05)(Table 2).

Table 2.

Association of income, education, and demographic factors with snacking(yes-no), CHNS 1991–2009

Factor Model 1
Model 2§
β p-value β p-value
Intercept −2.90 <.0001 −2.67 <.0001
Year 2004 0.19 <.0001 −0.04 0.64
Year 2006 0.88 <.0001 0.56 <.0001
Year 2009 1.36 <.0001 1.12 <.0001
Middle income 0.27 <.0001 0.14 0.06
High income 0.65 <.0001 0.22 0.002
High education 0.25 <.0001 0.25 <.0001
Age 7–12y −0.48 <.0001 −0.47 <.0001
Age 13–18y −0.90 <.0001 −0.91 <.0001
Age 19–44y −1.18 <.0001 −1.19 <.0001
Age ≥45y −1.23 <.0001 −1.24 <.0001
Female 0.22 <.0001 0.22 <.0001
Urbanicity 0.02 <.0001 0.02 <.0001
Medium income*year 2004 0.04 0.74
High income*year 2004 0.49 <.0001
Medium income*year 2006 0.20 0.04
High income*year 2006 0.61 <.0001
Medium income*year 2009 0.18 0.05
High income*year 2009 0.42 <.0001
Likelihood ratio test p<0.001

A person is defined as a snacker if he or she consumes any snack during the three days investigated in this study.

Model1 adjusts for only potential confounders with no interaction terms.

§

Model2 includes both confounders and significant time-income interaction items (time-education and income-education interactions are not significant; p<0.05); the referent in the model 1 and model 2 was year 1991, low income, low education, male, age 2–6 years.

Shift in contribution of snacking to total daily energy intake among snackers

A significant increase in the percentage of total EI from snacks was found only between 2004 and 2006. In 2009 snacking represented a percentage of EI that ranged from 12.3% in age 2–6 to 4.0% in adults age 19 and older (Table 3A).

Table 3.

Percentage of EI from snacks and number of daily snacking occasions among snackers by age group over a 3-day period between 1991 and 2009, China

1991 2004 2006 2009
A. % of total EI from snacks among snackers*
Total 4.4a 3.3b 4.6a 4.6a
 2–6y 9.8a 9.2a 12.2b 12.3b
 7–12y 5.8a 5.3a 6.1b 8.5b
 13–18y 4.5a 4.2a 5.5b 6.2b
 19–44y 2.8a 2.7a 4.0b 4.0b
 ≥45y 3.3a 3.2a 4.2b 4.1b
B. Number of daily snacking occasions among snackers*
Total 0.76a 0.80a 0.99b 0.95c
 2–6y 1.01a 1.02a 1.36b 1.18c
 7–12y 0.81a 0.86a 1.04b 0.98c
 13–18y 0.66a 0.84b 1.03c 0.95c
 19–44y 0.66a 0.72a 0.91b 0.89b
 ≥45y 0.69a 0.80b 1.00c 0.95c
*

Data of any two waves specified by different letters (a, b, or c) are statistically significant (p<0.05).

Change in number of daily snacking occasions among snackers

The number of snacking events increased slightly between 2004 and 2006 among snackers (Table 3B). Evening was the most common snacking occasion, and afternoon was the second most popular snacking occasion over time (unreported results).

Shift in key snack food patterns among snackers

Most interesting is the major increase in the consumption of fruits as snacks (Table 4). For children, the top five contributors to snacking EI were grains, fruits, beverages, fast foods, and animal foods, while adults derived snacking EI primarily from fruits, grains, and beverages (Table 4).

Table 4.

Percentage of snackers consuming any food group and its contribution to snacking energy over a 3-day period, 1991 and 2009

Age group Food group % of snackers Contribution to snacking energy (%)

1991 2009 1991 2009
2–6y Grains/cereals/beans/nuts 38.1 21.9 60.7 32.5
Vegetables 5.5 1.7 0.4 0.3
Fruits 29.9 35.4 21.6 21.6
Animal foods 13.0 13.5 5.0 10.5
Beverages 8.0 17.1 7.7 19.5
Candy/sugar/other sugar foods 4.5 2.1 3.6 1.9
Fast foods 0.0 7.9 0.0 10.8
Others 1.0 0.4 1.1 2.9
7–13y Grains/cereals/beans/nuts 37.9 19.2 66.3 30.8
Vegetables 9.7 1.9 1.0 0.4
Fruits 36.2 39.7 23.1 23.5
Animal foods 7.0 12.1 3.1 9.6
Beverages 5.3 15.6 4.7 19.5
Candy/sugar/other sugar foods 3.1 2.8 1.8 1.7
Fast foods 0.0 8.6 0.0 14.6
Others 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.0
13–18y Grains/cereals/beans/nuts 41.0 19.3 67.4 30.6
Vegetables 12.1 3.1 0.7 0.4
Fruits 35.8 44.9 21.1 27.8
Animal foods 6.4 8.6 4.4 6.4
Beverages 4.6 15.4 6.5 18.4
Candy/sugar/other sugar foods 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.2
Fast foods 0.0 6.5 0.0 15.1
Others 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
19–44y Grains/cereals/beans/nuts 34.8 15.1 66.0 29.1
Vegetables 10.0 3.8 0.9 0.7
Fruits 45.0 65.4 22.1 49.5
Animal foods 5.6 4.5 5.1 4.5
Beverages 3.7 9.1 5.4 13.2
Candy/sugar/other sugar foods 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4
Fast foods 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.7
Others 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
≥45y Grains/cereals/beans/nuts 31.9 17.6 63.3 28.7
Vegetables 10.5 4.5 1.0 1.3
Fruits 44.6 65.1 24.3 53.0
Animal foods 6.6 2.5 3.5 2.6
Beverages 3.8 8.9 4.5 12.5
Candy/sugar/other sugar foods 1.5 0.6 2.7 0.5
Fast foods 0.3 0.8 0.4 1.5
Others 0.8 0.1 0.4 0.1
*

p<0.05, chi-square test for snack food proportions between 1991 and 2009 by age group

The decreased proportion of EI from grains due to snacking is attributable to a decrease in consumption of rice, wheat, and high-fat cookies and cakes and an increase in low-fat cookies and cakes. Fruit EI from snacking is mainly from fresh and canned fruits. Milk beverages and sugar-sweetened beverages have significantly increased the EI from beverage snacks (Figures 2 and 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Percentage of energy from main food groups to snacking EI among children age 2–18 years, 1991 and 2009

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Percentage of energy from main food groups to snacking EI among adults age 19 years and older, 1991 and 2009

DISCUSSION

In China snacking played a small role in the diets of individuals of all ages until 2004. Since 2004 a marked transition in snacking behaviors and patterns has occurred with significant increases in the prevalence of snacking, the number of snacking occurrences in a day, and the contribution of snacks to total EI. This represents more than a doubling of snacking from 2004 to 2009. In 2009, 46.2%–58.8% of children consumed a snack over a three-day period, while about 35.0% of adults snacked. Among snackers, the EI from snacking ranged from 12.3% among younger children to 4.1% among older adults. Interestingly, the largest shift in snacking was toward an increase in fresh fruit consumption.

In contrast to the lower prevalence of snacking over a three-day period in China, in the United States the prevalence was 97% for adults and 94% for children in 2003–2006 with significant increases in 1989–1994 and 1994–2006.21, 22 In China dramatic increases occurred only after 2004, potentially indicating a major shift in food marketing related to snacking behaviors.

Snacking contributed a lower proportion of EI among snackers in China in contrast to about 24%–27% in the United States in 2003–2006,21, 22 about 21% in Scotland among children ages 5 to 17 in 2006,26 and about 35% in adult men and 40% in adult women in Finland in 2002.23 These differences may reflect the much healthier selection of low-energy-density fruits in China rather than the popular high-energy-density desserts, salty snacks, candies, and sweetened beverages chosen by American snackers.1, 15, 2023, 26 However, in China the recent increase in popularity of beverages and fast foods as snacks may represent an emerging health concern.

In addition, evening is the most popular snacking occasion among the Chinese population, while afternoon is the most popular among US adults and children.46 Some studies have assumed that evening or bedtime snacking combined with a sedentary lifestyle may lead to excessive weight gain,23, 47 although the research on this topic is inconsistent and limited.2, 6 One limitation is the measurement of snacking in this survey. Using repeated 24-hour dietary recall, snacking occasions were limited to morning, afternoon, and evening due to the lack of a specified time for each eating event. For this study, snacking is defined as food consumption outside the three main meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner). This is similar to the definition used in other studies.8, 9, 17, 35, 37 Furthermore, this measure excludes snack foods consumed during regular meals. Consequently, this is not a study of snack foods but rather of snacking events. Others have used time of day and respondents’ self-definitions rather than a food-based classification system.26 We feel our approach is appropriate given that foods associated with traditional Chinese meals are strictly delineated by the time of day. However, the measurement also limits snacking events to each in the morning, afternoon, and evening respectively, reducing its comparability with other snacking frequency studies, such as those that define snack events as food consumed in a 15-minute period.1 Our study examines snacking over a three-day period in contrast with others that use varied dietary survey days, such as one- or two-day periods.8, 15 In addition, there is limited information in Chinese food composition table on modern packaged and highly processed snack foods in China, most of which may be high-energy-density, deep-fried, and salty or sweetened foods. There is another problem with snacking. As is noted by others, this becomes in many societies a mindless activity which consumers often do not remember well.48 We will need to do further research to fully understand if there is measurement error in China that might explain why the increase in the percentage of snackers was about 10% while the number of snacking occasions remained stable.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the Chinese population is experiencing a dramatic increase in snacking and that a marked transition from a tradition of two or three main meals per day toward meals combined with snacks is underway. Further research should attempt to understand how the marketing of food and other changes in the food system have led to such dramatic changes in eating behavior. The health implications of such a transition in snacking behavior should be further investigated.

Acknowledgments

We thank Frances L. Dancy for administrative assistance and Tom Swasey for graphics support. ZW and BP analyzed data and performed statistical analysis; BP and ZW wrote the paper; BP had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Footnotes

AUTHOR DISCLOSURES

This study was funded by the NIH (R01-HD30880 and R01-HD38700); the Fogarty International Center, NIH, USA; and a gift from Kraft Foods. None of the authors have any undisclosed conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Zhihong Wang, Email: wzh@email.unc.edu.

Fengying Zhai, Email: zhai@infh.ac.cn.

Bing Zhang, Email: zzhangb327@yahoo.com.cn.

Barry M. Popkin, Email: popkin@unc.edu.

References

  • 1.Kerr MA, Rennie KL, McCaffrey TA, Wallace JM, Hannon-Fletcher MP, Livingstone MB. Snacking patterns among adolescents: a comparison of type, frequency and portion size between Britain in 1997 and Northern Ireland in 2005. Br J Nutr. 2009;101:122–31. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508994769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Phillips SM, Bandini LG, Naumova EN, Cyr H, Colclough S, Dietz WH, Must A. Energy-dense snack food intake in adolescence: longitudinal relationship to weight and fatness. Obes Res. 2004;12:461–72. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huang TT, Howarth NC, Lin BH, Roberts SB, McCrory MA. Energy intake and meal portions: associations with BMI percentile in U.S. children. Obes Res. 2004;12:1875–85. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Field AE, Austin SB, Gillman MW, Rosner B, Rockett HR, Colditz GA. Snack food intake does not predict weight change among children and adolescents. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1210–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nicklas TA, Yang SJ, Baranowski T, Zakeri I, Berenson G. Eating patterns and obesity in children. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:9–16. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00098-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hampl JS, Heaton CL, Taylor CA. Snacking patterns influence energy and nutrient intakes but not body mass index. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2003;16:3–11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-277x.2003.00417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Francis LA, Lee Y, Birch LL. Parental weight status and girls’ television viewing, snacking, and body mass indexes. Obes Res. 2003;11:143–51. doi: 10.1038/oby.2003.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zizza C, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. Significant increase in young adults’ snacking between 1977–1978 and 1994–1996 represents a cause for concern. Prev Med. 2001;32:303–10. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jahns L, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. The increasing prevalence of snacking among US children from 1977 to 1996. J Pediatr. 2001;138:493–8. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.112162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zaveri S, Drummond S. The effect of including a conventional snack (cereal bar) and a nonconventional snack (almonds) on hunger, eating frequency, dietary intake and body weight. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2009;22:461–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2009.00983.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Singh AS, Chinapaw MJ, Brug J, Kremers SP, Visscher TL, van Mechelen W. Ethnic differences in BMI among Dutch adolescents: what is the role of screen-viewing, active commuting to school, and consumption of soft drinks and high-caloric snacks? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:23. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McDonald CM, Baylin A, Arsenault JE, Mora-Plazas M, Villamor E. Overweight is more prevalent than stunting and is associated with socioeconomic status, maternal obesity, and a snacking dietary pattern in school children from Bogota, Colombia. J Nutr. 2009;139:370–6. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.098111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bes-Rastrollo M, Sanchez-Villegas A, Basterra-Gortari FJ, Nunez-Cordoba JM, Toledo E, Serrano-Martinez M. Prospective study of self-reported usual snacking and weight gain in a Mediterranean cohort: The SUN project. Clin Nutr. 2010;29:323–30. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Berg C, Lappas G, Wolk A, Strandhagen E, Toren K, Rosengren A, Thelle D, Lissner L. Eating patterns and portion size associated with obesity in a Swedish population. Appetite. 2009;52:21–6. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zizza CA, Tayie FA, Lino M. Benefits of snacking in older Americans. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:800–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nicklas TA, Baranowski T, Cullen KW, Berenson G. Eating patterns, dietary quality and obesity. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001;20:599–608. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2001.10719064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.de Graaf C. Effects of snacks on energy intake: an evolutionary perspective. Appetite. 2006;47:18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Keast DR, Nicklas TA, O’Neil CE. Snacking is associated with reduced risk of overweight and reduced abdominal obesity in adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92:428–35. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Popkin BM, Duffey KJ. Does hunger and satiety drive eating anymore? Increasing eating occasions and decreasing time between eating occasions in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:1342–7. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.BerteusForslund H, Torgerson JS, Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK. Snacking frequency in relation to energy intake and food choices in obese men and women compared to a reference population. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29:711–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Piernas C, Popkin BM. Trends In Snacking Among U.S. Children. Health Affairs. 2010;29:398–404. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Piernas C, Popkin BM. Snacking increased among U.S. adults between 1977 and 2006. J Nutr. 2010;140:325–32. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.112763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ovaskainen ML, Reinivuo H, Tapanainen H, Hannila ML, Korhonen T, Pakkala H. Snacks as an element of energy intake and food consumption. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:494–501. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kerver JM, Yang EJ, Obayashi S, Bianchi L, Song WO. Meal and snack patterns are associated with dietary intake of energy and nutrients in US adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.09.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mattes RD. Dietary compensation by humans for supplemental energy provided as ethanol or carbohydrate in fluids. Physiol Behav. 1996;59:179–87. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Macdiarmid J, Loe J, Craig LC, Masson LF, Holmes B, McNeill G. Meal and snacking patterns of school-aged children in Scotland. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:1297–304. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.BerteusForslund H, Klingstrom S, Hagberg H, Londahl M, Torgerson JS, Lindroos AK. Should snacks be recommended in obesity treatment? A 1-year randomized clinical trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62:1308–17. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wu Y. Overweight and obesity in China. BMJ. 2006;333:362–363. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7564.362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Levine JA. Obesity in China: causes and solutions. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121:1043–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.World Health Organization. Preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Reynolds K, Gu D, Whelton PK, Wu X, Duan X, Mo J, He J. Prevalence and risk factors of overweight and obesity in China. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15:10–18. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Popkin BM, Keyou G, Zhai F, Guo X, Ma H, Zohoori N. The nutrition transition in China: a cross-sectional analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993;47:333–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ng SW, Zhai FY, Popkin BM. Impacts of China’s edible oil pricing policy on nutrition. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:414–26. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Popkin BM. Will China’s nutrition transition overwhelm its health care system and slow economic growth? Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1064–76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang ZH, Zhai FY, Du SF, Popkin B. Dynamic shifts in Chinese eating behaviors. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17:123–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yu DM, Zhang B, Zhao LY, Wang HJ. Snacks consumption in Chinese children and adolescents at the ages of 3–17 years. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2008;37:710–13. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu Y, Zhai FY, Popkin BM. Trends in eating behaviours among Chinese children (1991–1997) Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006;15:72–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Adair LS, Popkin BM. Are child eating patterns being transformed globally? Obes Res. 2005;13:1281–99. doi: 10.1038/oby.2005.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Du SF, Mroz TA, Zhai FY, Popkin BM. Rapid income growth adversely affects diet quality in China--particularly for the poor! Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1505–15. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhai FY, Guo XG, Popkin BM, Ma LM, Wang Q, Yu WT, Jin SG, Ge KY. The evaluation of the 24–hour individual recall method in China. Food Nutr Bull. 1996;17:154–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Popkin BM, Du SF, Zhai FY, Zhang B. Cohort Profile: The China Health and Nutrition Survey--monitoring and understanding socio-economic and health change in China, 1989–2011. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;39:1435–40. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yao M, Lichtenstein AH, Roberts SB, Ma G, Gao S, Tucker KL, McCrory MA. Relative influence of diet and physical activity on cardiovascular risk factors in urban Chinese adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:920–32. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Paeratakul S, Popkin BM, Kohlmeier L, Hertz-Picciotto I, Guo X, Edwards LJ. Measurement error in dietary data: implications for the epidemiologic study of the diet-disease relationship. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998;52:722–27. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Popkin BM, Lu B, Zhai FY. Understanding the nutrition transition: measuring rapid dietary changes in transitional countries. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:947–53. doi: 10.1079/PHN2002370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jones-Smith JC, Popkin BM. Understanding community context and adult health changes in China: development of an urbanicity scale. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1436–46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cross AT, Babicz D, Cushman LF. Snacking patterns among 1,800 adults and children. J Am Diet Assoc. 1994;94:1398–403. doi: 10.1016/0002-8223(94)92542-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.BerteusForslund H, Lindroos AK, Sjostrom L, Lissner L. Meal patterns and obesity in Swedish women-a simple instrument describing usual meal types, frequency and temporal distribution. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56:740–47. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wansink B. Mindless eating – why we eat more than we think. New York: Bantam-Dell; 2006. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES