Abstract
TIMP-2 protein has been intensively studied as a promising anticancer candidate agent, but the in vivo mechanism underlying its anticancer effect has not been clearly elucidated by previous works. In this study, we investigated the mechanism underlying the anti-tumor effects of a TIMP-2 fusion protein conjugated with human serum albumin (HSA/TIMP-2). Systemic administration of HSA/TIMP-2 effectively inhibited tumor growth at a minimum effective dose of 60 mg/kg. The suppressive effect of HSA/TIMP-2 was accompanied by a marked reduction of in vivo vascularization. The anti-angiogenic activity of HSA/TIMP-2 was directly confirmed by CAM assays. In HSA/TIMP-2-treated tumor tissues, MMP-2 expression was profoundly decreased without a change in MT1-MMP expression of PECAM-1-positive cells. MMP-2 mRNA was also decreased by HSA/TIMP-2 treatment of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Zymographic analysis showed that HSA/TIMP-2 substantially decreased extracellular pro-MMP-2 activity (94–99% reduction) and moderately decreased active MMP-2 activity (10–24% reduction), suggesting MT1-MMP-independent MMP-2 modulation. Furthermore, HSA/TIMP-2 had no effect on in vitro active MMP-2 activity and in vivo MMP-2 activity. These studies show that HSA/TIMP-2 potentiates anti-angiogenic activity by modulating MMP-2 expression, but not MMP-2 activity, to subsequently suppress tumor growth, suggesting an important role for MMP-2 expression rather than MMP-2 activity in anti-angiogenesis.
Introduction
Angiogenesis is a fundamental process comprising the development of new blood vessels from preexisting vessels in physiological and pathological conditions. Development of new blood vessels is one predominant mode of tumor progression, thus the therapeutic manipulation of angiogenesis has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment [1], [2], [3]. Although tumor angiogenesis is a complex multistep process, the degradation of components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) by proteolytic enzymes known as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) represents a crucial stage [4]. Artificial inhibitors to control ECM proteolysis in angiogenic tumors have been developed and characterized in many laboratory and clinical trials [4], [5], [6]. However, human clinical trials of synthetic MMP inhibitors for the treatment of cancers have failed to show therapeutic benefit in humans [5]. As an alternative, natural inhibitors of MMPs (tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases; TIMPs) have increasingly attracted attention as promising anticancer candidate agents.
TIMPs have multiple functions in cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and differentiation in addition to their MMP-inhibitory activities [6], [7], [8]. TIMP-2, one of four TIMPs, is a key regulator of, and potential therapeutic agent against, angiogenesis and tumor progression [9]. Gene therapy studies using adenoviral and retroviral delivery systems in tumors have demonstrated a role for TIMP-2 in suppressing angiogenesis and subsequent tumor progression in animal models [10], [11]. However, virus-mediated TIMP-2 gene therapy in humans may limit its therapeutic application due to safety concerns, including cytotoxicity and immune responses, along with it being a possible causative agent of cancer [12], [13].
TIMP-2, a non-glycosylated protein, can be expressed in Escherichia coli, but this process often results in the formation of insoluble protein aggregates as inclusion bodies. Following the recovery process including denaturation and renaturation, one of the critical points for achieving a biologically active protein, TIMP-2 proteins are often obtained as misfolded, biologically inactive molecules with three-dimensional structures different from native protein, which may be due to the presence of incorrect 6-disulfide bridges [14], [15]. Modified TIMP-2 proteins such as Ala+TIMP-2 [16] and TIMP-2 chimera protein with mosaic serine protease [17] have also been developed and revealed a profound multi-functional mechanism of TIMP-2. However, a lack of information persists concerning the mechanism of its anticancer effect in vivo. Recently, a TIMP-2 fusion protein with human serum albumin (HSA/TIMP-2) was produced with high yield from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and demonstrated an inhibitory effect against tumor growth [18]. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that HSA/TIMP-2 exhibits favorable pharmacokinetic properties in prostate tumor xenograft [19].
In this study, our goals were to investigate the precise role of HSA/TIMP-2 in anti-tumor activity associated with angiogenesis and further define in vivo molecular links between anti-angiogenesis and the modulation of MMP-2. Our results show that HSA/TIMP-2, which does not inhibit MMP-2 activity or MT1-MMP expression in vivo, acts to promote anti-tumor and anti-angiogenesis activity through the downregulation of MMP-2 expression. This study is the first report of the in vivo mechanism underlying anti-tumor activity and anti-angiogenesis associated with MMP-2 modulation via TIMP-2 protein.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
Rat prostate cancer MAT-LyLu (MLL) cells were kindly supplied by JungHan Yoon (Hallym University, Korea) [20] and were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA), containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) with 100,000 U/L penicillin and 100 mg/L streptomycin (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA). To generate a luciferase-expressing, stable MLL cell line, MLL cells were stably transfected with a CMV promoter-driven firefly luciferase expression construct (pcDNA3.1-Luc, a gift from Dr. Dongmin Kang, Ewha University, Seoul, Korea) using Lipofectamine™ (Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were grown under hygromycin B (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) selection, and positive clones were screened by bioluminescence, supplemented with 150 µg/mL d-luciferin (Biosynth International, Inc., Naperville, IL). Three clonal cell lines were initially selected, and the strongest bioluminescent derivative MLL cell line (MLL-Luc) was used in this study. The cell lines were monthly checked by PCR detection of mycoplasma contamination.
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were provided by Dr. Kwon Soo Ha (Kangwon University, Korea) [21] and cultured in growth medium 199 (Gibco-BRL), supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum, 10 ng/mL human basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 5 U/ml heparin. Confluent HUVECs (passages 4–7) were used for the experiments. All cell lines were cultured at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.
In vitro and in vivo MMP-2 enzyme activity assay
MMP-2 activity was measured using a sensitive MMP-2 near-infrared fluorescent (NIRF) probe as a MMP-2 substrate [22]. For in vitro assay, inactive proMMP-2 (R&D Systems) was converted into the active form by incubation with 2.5 mM p-aminophenyl mercuric acid (Sigma) at 37°C for 30 min prior to use. HSA/TIMP-2, MMP inhibitor (MMP I, Calbiochem, San Diego, USA), or TIMP-2 were incubated in the reaction buffer (100 mM Tris, 5 mM CaCl2, 200 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Brij) containing 14 nM MMP-2 NIRF probe and 14 nM activated MMP-2 for 40 min. Changes in fluorescence intensity were measured using an IVIS-200 imaging system (Xenogen Corporation, Alameda, CA).
In vivo MMP-2 enzymatic activity was analyzed according to the method of Bremer et al. [23], with some modifications. Briefly, when MLL tumor had grown to about 500 mm3 in volume, MMP I (50 nM), HSA/TIMP-2 (80 mg/kg), or PBS control was intraperitoneally (ip) injected twice per day. Subsequently, MMP-2 NIRF probe (100 nM) was intravenously administered 30 min after the second injection of MMP I or HSA/TIMP-2. NIRF images were obtained 2 h after probe injection with Xenogen Living Image® software (Xenogen Corporation) as described in a previous study [19].
Zymographic analysis
MMP-2 activity was analyzed by gelatin zymography according to the method of Uemura et al. [24], with some modifications. Briefly, HUVECs were grown to 70–80% confluence, washed once with PBS, and incubated for 72 h in serum-free medium in the presence of HSA/TIMP-2. The culture medium was centrifuged (1,000 rpm, 5 min), and the supernatants were subjected to gelatin zymography. Aliquots of the supernatants (10 µL) were mixed with sample buffer and applied directly to a 10% polyacrylamide gel containing 1 mg/mL gelatin and 0.1% (w/v) SDS. After electrophoresis, the gels were soaked in renaturing solution for 60 min and then incubated in developing solution overnight for maximum sensitivity. The gel was stained with 0.5% Coomassie blue G-250 (Thermo Scientific Co., Waltham, MA) for 30 min and destained until the bands could be seen clearly.
Semi-quantitative analysis of mRNA levels
Total RNA and cDNA were prepared as described in our previous study [25]. PCR was performed with 100 ng cDNA per sample for MMP-2 and the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) to normalize the samples using Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) in a PCR machine (PC-808, Astec, Japan). Primer sequences for human GAPDH were 5′-AGAAGGCTGGGGCTCATTTG-3′ (sense) and 5′-GGGGCCATCCACAGTCTTC-3′ (antisense), and the PCR for GAPDH was performed for 5 min at 95°C followed by 27 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 56°C, and 1 min at 72°C as well as a final elongation step for 10 min at 72°C. MMP-2 primers were 5′-GTGCTGAAGGACACACACTAAAGAAGA-3′ (sense) and 5′-TTGCCATCCTTCTCAAAGTTGTAGG-3′ (antisense) [26]. PCR conditions for MMP-2 were the same as described for GAPDH except for the primer annealing temperature (58°C) and the number of cycles (28 cycles). The amplification products of the PCR were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. For quantification, the gels were scanned by an imaging system (TFX-20M, Vilber-Lourmat, France) and analyzed using the ImageJ program (open source ImageJ software available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
Subcutaneous primary solid tumor model
Male Balb/c nude mice (Orient, Gyeonggi-do, Korea), 8–10 weeks old, were anesthetized by exposure to 1–3% isoflurane/O2 and administered 1×105 MLL or MLL-Luc cells suspended in 50 µL sterile PBS by subcutaneous (sc) injection into the dorsal flank. Tumor growth was monitored for 5 days after injection by in vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and external caliper measurements. Tumor volume was estimated by the formula, L×W2/2 (L = tumor length, W = tumor width). The use and care of animals was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI-AEC 1110).
Bioluminescence imaging
In vivo BLI was performed with an IVIS-200 imaging system (Xenogen Corporation). Mice received the substrate D-luciferin by ip injection at a dose of 150 mg/kg dissolved in Dulbecco's PBS. At 10 min after injection, mice were anesthetized and then placed onto a warmed stage. Imaging was performed for 1–3 min, depending on the tumor size and time point. Generally, five mice were imaged at one time. Regions of interest in the tumor were quantified as photon flux (p/s) using Xenogen Living Image® software.
Chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay
Anti-angiogenic activity was determined using a CAM assay as described previously [27]. Fertilized chicken eggs were incubated at 38°C in an 80% humidified atmosphere. On day 8, filter disks (0.5 cm in diameter) were loaded on the CAM. HSA/TIMP-2 (1 mg/dose) or the equivalent volume of PBS was deposited in the center of the filter. Treatment was repeated daily for 3 days, and CAM results were analyzed on the fourth day. Photos of each CAM were taken under a stereomicroscope (Stemi 2000-C, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using a digital camera (G5 PC1049, Canon, Japan). Angiogenesis was quantified by counting the number of blood vessel branch points surrounding the filter disk; at least 10 viable embryos were tested for each treatment.
Dynamic in vivo imaging of blood vessels
Images of peritumoral blood vessels in living prostate cancer xenografts were obtained using intravital fiberoptic confocal fluorescence microscopy (FCFM; Cellvizio® system; Mauna Kea Technologies, Paris, France) as described previously [28] and analyzed with ImageCell software version 3.6.1 (Mauna Kea Technologies). The maximum signal observed within each frame was averaged across a large set of representative frames (minimum 10) to determine the fluorescence reading for each mouse peritumoral blood vessel. For quantification, randomly selected frames were inspected blindly under an LSM 5 Pascal confocal fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss) using a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) filter at 488 nm. The image was then analyzed using Pascal imaging software (version 2.8 SP1) to measure the mean fluorescent vascular density.
Immunohistochemical analyses
After euthanizing the mice 15 days after 80 mg/kg HSA/TIMP-2 administration to prostate cancer xenografts, tumor tissues were collected and fixed overnight in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Immunohistochemical analyses were performed on 8-µm sections using monoclonal antibodies specific for Ki-67 (1∶500; Abcam, Cambridge, MA), active caspase-3 (1∶500; Abcam), or MMP-2 (1∶500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) as described previously [29]. Slides were developed in 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (Sigma) as a chromogenic substrate and then counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin. Images were taken with a light microscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with a digital camera (DP71, Olympus, Japan) connected to a PC monitor.
For immunofluorescence staining, the sections were stained with monoclonal antibodies specific for PECAM-1 (1∶50; BD Biosciences, Transduction Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA), MMP-2 (1∶200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or MT1-MMP (1∶200; Millipore, Billerica, MA) and subsequently exposed to Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-rat antibody or 546-labeled goat anti-rabbit antibody, or 633-labeled goat anti-mouse antibody (1∶500; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). Sections were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (1∶3,000; Invitrogen). Fluorescence signals were analyzed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM-5 and LSM System, ver. 3.98; Carl Zeiss).
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was carried out as described previously [30], and protein concentrations were determined by a standard protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The primary antibodies were specific for PECAM-1 (1∶200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), MMP-2 (1∶1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), MT1-MMP (1∶200; Millipore), or actin (1∶10,000; Sigma). Detection was carried out using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG (1∶5,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and visualized using the ECL assay kit (Amersham, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). The band intensities obtained by western blot analysis were determined using the ImageJ program.
Statistical analysis
For all results, values are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed using the Student's t test for comparisons of 2 groups and using one-way or two-way ANOVA (Graphpad Software Inc version 3.05, San Diego, CA, USA) for multigroup comparisons. Significance was set at P<0.05.
Results
Anti-tumor activity of HSA/TIMP-2 in prostate cancer xenografts
To quantify the inhibitory effect of HSA/TIMP-2 on tumor growth with BLI, we used a luminescent cancer xenograft with a rat prostate cancer MLL cell line stably expressing firefly luciferase. HSA/TIMP-2 protein was ip injected into the MLL-Luc prostate cancer xenografts every other day for two weeks based on our previous pharmacokinetic results [19]. As shown in Fig. 1, bioluminescence signal reached 3.92±0.79×107 p/s at day 14 after PBS injection in the control group, and significant inhibition of tumor growth was observed in the 60, 80, and 100 mg/kg HSA/TIMP-2 treatment groups: 45.9%, 55.8% and 80.8%, respectively, as compared to control (Fig. 1B; F(4.45) = 13.69, P<0.0001, one-way ANOVA).
Anti-proliferation, no apoptosis effect of HSA/TIMP-2
Anti-tumor activity typically requires the coordinated action of tumor cell anti-proliferation and apoptosis [31]. Accordingly, to evaluate possible in vivo effects of HSA/TIMP-2 on apoptosis and proliferation, immunohistochemical staining data from treatment and control groups of tumor-bearing mice were compared. The percentages of active caspase-3-positive cells (apoptotic cells) in control and 80 mg/kg HSA/TIMP-2-treated groups were 10.2% and 10.8%, respectively, with no significant difference (Fig. 2B; P = 0.80 vs. control), suggesting no effect of HSA/TIMP-2 treatment on the apoptotic status of tumor cells. However, HSA/TIMP-2 treatment had a significant anti-proliferation effect in tumor cells in vivo. Strong immunostaining for Ki-67 was observed in tumors from the control group, whereas weak and moderate staining, with a 28.1% reduction in Ki-67 immunoreactivity, was found in the HSA/TIMP-2-treated group (Fig. 2B; P<0.05 vs. control). Similar to the anti-proliferation effect observed in vivo, decreased cell proliferation was also found in cultures of HUVECs (Fig. S1).
In vivo anti-angiogenic activity of HSA/TIMP-2
Although HSA/TIMP-2 has been shown to have an inhibitory effect on the formation of capillary-like phenotype in HUVEC cultures [18], [19], its direct contribution to in vivo anti-angiogenesis is not known. Thus, we performed CAM assays to investigate the anti-angiogenic activity of HSA/TIMP-2, which demonstrated that vascularization of the HSA/TIMP-2-treated group was significantly decreased by 47.7% compared with the control group (Fig. 3A, B; P<0.01). In analyzing tumor vascularization by immunofluorescence staining for endothelial cell marker PECAM-1, the microvessels of HSA/TIMP-2-treated tumor tissue demonstrated a significant 39.2% decrease in PECAM-1 level compared with the control group (Fig. 3C, D; P<0.01). Western blot analysis also revealed an even more severe 76.3% reduction in the expression of PECAM-1 in the HSA/TIMP-2-treated group (Fig. 3E, F; P<0.01 vs. control). Consistent with the observed decrease in PECAM-1 level, dynamic in vivo imaging of the vasculature using FCFM revealed that the relative FITC-stained vessel density significantly decreased by 50.8% in HSA/TIMP-2-treated group (Fig. S2; P<0.01 vs. control, Video S1 and S2).
Regulation of MMP-2 and MT1-MMP expression by HSA/TIMP-2
Given the in vivo anti-angiogenic activity of HSA/TIMP-2, we explored the regulatory effects of HSA/TIMP-2 on MMP-2, a key regulator of tumor angiogenesis known to be modulated through an interaction with TIMP-2 [32], [33]. A similar decrease in MMP-2 was also revealed in the lysates of HSA/TIMP-2-treated tumors by western blot analysis (Fig. S3A, B). In addition, RT-PCR analysis showed that HSA/TIMP-2 treatment decreased MMP-2 mRNA in a dose-dependent manner in HUVECs (Fig. 4C, D).
To further identify whether the downregulation of MMP-2 in endothelial cells is associated with MT1-MMP, which facilitates peri/extracellular pro-MMP-2 activation, we performed triple-fluorescence immunostaining for PECAM-1, MMP-2 and MT1-MMP on tumor tissue. Quantitative analysis indicated that the level of MT1-MMP in PECAM-1-positive blood vessels did not significantly differ between control and HSA/TIMP-2-treated tumors (P = 0.918), which was confirmed by western blotting of tumor lysates from the HSA/TIMP-2-treated group (Fig. S3C, D; P = 0.096). In contrast, consistent with previous results, MMP-2 level in PECAM-1-positive blood vessels was significantly decreased by 50.9% in the HSA/TIMP-2-treated group (Fig. 4E, F; P<0.01 vs. control), indicating that inhibition of MMP-2 by HSA/TIMP-2 is independent of MT1-MMP expression.
Effect of HSA/TIMP-2 on MMP-2 proteolytic activity in HUVECs
The unexpected results on MT1-MMP expression led us to investigate the modulation of MMP-2 activity. We compared the effects of TIMP-2 and HSA/TIMP-2 on MMP-2 activity using zymographic analysis of HUVEC-conditioned media. As shown in Fig. 5A, TIMP-2 dose-dependently inhibited both pro-MMP-2 (72 kDa) and active MMP-2 (68 kDa) activity. However, the effect of HSA/TIMP-2 on MMP-2 activity was represented by distinct patterns in pro-MMP-2 activation. Pro-MMP-2 showed an outright loss of activity even at the low dose of HSA/TIMP-2 (2.5 µM), showing a dramatic decrease of 93.9% compared to that of control. Active MMP-2 activity was suppressed by HSA/TIMP-2 treatment, which had a maximal effect of 23.8% inhibition at 2.5 µM and did not decrease further at higher doses of HSA/TIMP-2 (Fig. 5B). This finding could be the result of unleashing endogenous MT1-MMP to promote pro-MMP-2 activation. This data support the in vivo evidence that HSA/TIMP-2 inhibited tumoral angiogenesis through downregulated expression of MMP-2, but not the modulation of MT1-MMP activity.
Lack of the effect of HSA/TIMP-2 on MMP-2 activity
The MMP-2 inhibitory activity of TIMP-2 is known to be lost by modification of the N-terminal of TIMP-2 such as carbamylation [34] or addition of an extra Ala [16], [35]. To determine whether the substitution of the TIMP-2 N-terminal with HSA alters TIMP-2 inhibitory activity, we compared the activity of HSA/TIMP-2 with TIMP-2 and an MMP inhibitor (MMP I) using a near-infrared fluorescent (NIRF) probe [22]. As shown in Fig. 6A, the NIRF probe demonstrated a strong fluorescent intensity (1.01±0.01×108 p/s) after proteolytic activation by MMP-2, and this intensity was reduced by 75.9% with 10 nM TIMP-2 and by 69.4% with 15 nM MMP I pre-treatment as compared to non-treatment. However, 30 nM HSA/TIMP-2 treatment did not decrease NIRF signal (data not shown), and high doses of HSA/TIMP-2 barely inhibited NIRF signals by 18.2% at 5 µM and 39.9% at 50 µM compared to non-treatment. Thus, the inhibitory activity of HSA/TIMP-2 on MMP-2 was 4 orders of magnitude less than that of native TIMP-2 and MMP I. Furthermore, consistent with in vitro results, 2 h after injection of NIRF probe, HSA/TIMP-2-treated MLL-tumor xenografted mice demonstrated no NIRF intensity change, whereas the MMP I-treated group demonstrated NIRF intensity significantly decreased by 21.7% compared with the control group (Fig. 6C; F(1,24) = 5.43, P<0.05, two-way ANOVA), providing further support for the loss-of-function effect of HSA/TIMP-2 on MMP-2 proteolytic activity.
Discussion
In this study, we provide in vivo evidence for anti-tumor activity linked to anti-angiogenesis by HSA/TIMP-2 and further clarify that the anti-angiogenesis is associated with attenuated MMP-2 expression independent of MMP-2 activity as demonstrated by the absence of effects on MT1-MMP expression and pro-MMP-2 activation.
Our data concerning the effects of HSA/TIMP-2 on in vivo angiogenesis are in agreement with the earlier findings of a null-MMP inhibitor form of TIMP-2 (Ala+TIMP-2) [16]. HSA/TIMP-2 has no inhibitory effect on MMP-2 activity in vitro and in vivo; nevertheless HSA/TIMP-2 demonstrated a prominent anti-proliferation effect on tumor cells in cancer xenografts. HSA/TIMP-2 also interferes with processes critical to angiogenesis such as endothelial cell proliferation and capillary-like tube formation [19], and thus shows in vivo anti-angiogenesis effects. Additionally, we have verified that the anti-angiogenic activity is differentially modulated by HSA/TIMP-2 treatment leading to downregulation of MMP-2 transcript in HUVEC cells. This finding is consistent with previous reports that MMP-2 deficiency by genetic ablation or siRNA-based approaches results in reduced angiogenesis [36], [37], [38]. Interestingly, however, HSA/TIMP-2 did not induce downregulation of MT1-MMP expression in vivo. In the zymographic analysis, we found no inhibitory action of HSA/TIMP-2 on pro-MMP-2 activation, resulting in the sustained activity of active MMP-2. These results suggest a disconnection between anti-angiogenic activity and MMP-2 activity. This concept is supported by our results showing no effect of HSA/TIMP-2 on MT1-MMP expression and other findings concerning the MMP-2-independent anti-angiogenic activity of TIMP-2 [16], [39]. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that the C-terminal domain of TIMP-2, in particular loop 6, inhibits endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis [40], suggesting a potential role of the C-terminal domain of TIMP-2 in the anti-angiogenic activity of HSA/TIMP-2.
Cancer development involves complex multistep processes, but all cancers share the ability to proliferate beyond the constraints limiting growth in normal tissue and to resist the intrinsic property of self-destruction called apoptosis [41], [42]. Because deregulated cell proliferation together with suppressed cell death provide a common platform for tumor progression, they present targets for cancer therapy [43]. Numerous studies have considered to these two defects as cancer targets, whereas the effects of TIMPs on cell proliferation or apoptosis have been restricted to cell-based experiments and elicited divergent effects even in the same cell types [44], [45], [46], [47]. Consistent with previous observations in melanoma cells and human microvascular endothelial cells [47], [48], [49], we demonstrated that cell proliferation was potently downregulated in HSA/TIMP-2-treated tumor tissue as well as HUVECs. In contrast, the effect of HSA/TIMP-2 on apoptosis did not differ from control, which is contrary to the MMP-independent proapoptotic effect of TIMP-2 described previously [39], [50], [51]. This difference may be due to the differing ability of HSA/TIMP-2 and TIMP-2 to regulate the expression of MMP-2. With respect to the interaction of death pathways with MMP-2, Shapiro et al. [52] demonstrated that active MMP-2 induces apoptosis of endothelial cells via the p38 MAPK apoptotic pathway, which enhances MMP-2 synthesis and its activation probably through MT1-MMP. In contrast, Preaux et al. [53] showed that apoptosis promotes pro-MMP-2 activation through increased MT1-MMP expression. The relationship between apoptosis and MMP-2 is controversial; however, our data support the hypothesis that downregulation of MMP-2 expression by HSA/TIMP-2 is associated with an attenuation of apoptosis.
Our finding that high doses of HSA/TIMP-2 protein inhibit angiogenesis and subsequently inhibit tumor growth is consistent with the findings of previous TIMP-2 studies [10], [11], [16], [54]. However, at lower doses (less than 40 mg/kg), HSA/TIMP-2 demonstrated a stimulative effect on prostate cancer xenografts (data not shown). This difference may be explained by the bi-functional activity of TIMP-2 in angiogenesis, as proposed by Seo et al. [16]: low levels of TIMP-2 enhance angiogenesis by the activation of MMPs through an MT1-MMP-dependent mechanism, whereas high levels of TIMP-2 downregulate angiogenic signaling through binding to α3β1 integrin. Thus, our determination of the effective dose for anti-tumor activity provides important information for cancer therapies aimed at modulating angiogenesis.
In agreement with a previous study of B16BL6 melanoma xenografts [18], systemic administration of HSA/TIMP-2 protein also demonstrated a potent anticancer effect in MLL prostate cancer xenografts. However, the minimum effective doses of the two studies differ slightly. It was determined as 60 mg/kg in this study, whereas tumor growth was suppressed at 40 mg/kg in the B16BL6 melanoma xenograft model. This difference could be explained by different experimental methods such as the number of drug injections, the cancer cell line used for tumor xenografts, and the detection method of tumor growth. In this study, we used BLI analysis with a MLL bioluminescent xenograft model [55], which has several advantages over traditional caliper measurements including accurate monitoring of tumor growth as well as earlier tumor detection as the tumor progresses. Traditional volumetric analysis by caliper measurements inevitably counts necrotic areas and edema as well as cancer cells in a tumor, but the bioluminescence signals of BLI analysis are derived from only viable cancer cells and thus exclude a systematic bias from the inclusion of necrotic areas and edema [56], [57]. This different sensitivity of detection methods may explain the different minimum effective doses of the two studies, as a moderate correlation was observed between tumor volume and photon flux (R2 = 0.89, Fig. S5). In addition to the detection method of tumor growth, another explanation is the number of HSA/TIMP-2 administrations. HSA/TIMP-2 was injected every two days in this study, whereas 40 mg/kg HSA/TIMP-2 was injected daily in the B16BL6 melanoma xenograft study [18].
In conclusion, this study is the first to report that HSA/TIMP-2 has dose-dependent effects on tumor growth in male Balb/c nude mice, highlighting the importance of minimum effective dose determination on anti-tumor activity in vivo. We also demonstrate that the anti-tumor activity of HSA/TIMP-2 is strongly associated with anti-angiogenesis attributed to a reduction of MMP-2 production but without inhibition of MT1-MMP, indicating that HSA/TIMP-2 plays a more complex role in anti-angiogenesis. Taken together, these findings provide a useful basis for the in vivo mechanistic study of TIMP-2 anti-tumor activity and suggest that HSA/TIMP-2 holds promise as an anticancer drug.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Prof. J-Y Kim for helpful discussions regarding HSA/TIMP-2 function.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: SML works at BiocurePharm, who produced the HSA/TIMP-2. The author has no influence on any part of the current project and confirms that this does not alter his adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. None of other authors have any potential conflict of interest to declare.
Funding: This study was supported by a Korea Basic Science Institute grant (T31901) to SH. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000;407:249–257. doi: 10.1038/35025220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen Y, Gorski DH. Regulation of angiogenesis through a microRNA (miR-130a) that down-regulates antiangiogenic homeobox genes GAX and HOXA5. Blood. 2008;111:1217–1226. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-07-104133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor as a target for anticancer therapy. Oncologist. 2004;9(Suppl 1):2–10. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-suppl_1-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lafleur MA, Handsley MM, Edwards DR. Metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in angiogenesis. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2003;5:1–39. doi: 10.1017/S1462399403006628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Coussens LM, Fingleton B, Matrisian LM. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and cancer: trials and tribulations. Science. 2002;295:2387–2392. doi: 10.1126/science.1067100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jiang Y, Goldberg ID, Shi YE. Complex roles of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in cancer. Oncogene. 2002;21:2245–2252. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baker AH, Edwards DR, Murphy G. Metalloproteinase inhibitors: biological actions and therapeutic opportunities. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:3719–3727. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brew K, Dinakarpandian D, Nagase H. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: evolution, structure and function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1477:267–283. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(99)00279-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stetler-Stevenson WG, Brown PD, Onisto M, Levy AT, Liotta LA. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) mRNA expression in tumor cell lines and human tumor tissues. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:13933–13938. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li H, Lindenmeyer F, Grenet C, Opolon P, Menashi S, et al. AdTIMP-2 inhibits tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis, and prolongs survival in mice. Hum Gene Ther. 2001;12:515–526. doi: 10.1089/104303401300042429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Imren S, Kohn DB, Shimada H, Blavier L, DeClerck YA. Overexpression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 retroviral-mediated gene transfer in vivo inhibits tumor growth and invasion. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2891–2895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yi Y, Hahm SH, Lee KH. Retroviral gene therapy: safety issues and possible solutions. Curr Gene Ther. 2005;5:25–35. doi: 10.2174/1566523052997514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Varmus H. Retroviruses. Science. 1988;240:1427–1435. doi: 10.1126/science.3287617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Negro A, Onisto M, Masiero L, Garbisa S. Synthesis and refolding of human TIMP-2 from E. coli, with specific activity for MMP-2. FEBS Lett. 1995;360:52–56. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00073-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Williamson RA. Refolding of TIMP-2 from Escherichia coli inclusion bodies. Methods Mol Biol. 2001;151:257–265. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-046-2:257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seo DW, Li H, Guedez L, Wingfield PT, Diaz T, et al. TIMP-2 mediated inhibition of angiogenesis: an MMP-independent mechanism. Cell. 2003;114:171–180. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00551-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nishida Y, Miyamori H, Thompson EW, Takino T, Endo Y, et al. Activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) by membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase through an artificial receptor for proMMP-2 generates active MMP-2. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9096–9104. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kang WK, Park EK, Lee HS, Park BY, Chang JY, et al. A biologically active angiogenesis inhibitor, human serum albumin-TIMP-2 fusion protein, secreted from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Protein Expr Purif. 2007;53:331–338. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2007.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee MS, Kim YH, Kim YJ, Kwon SH, Bang JK, et al. Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of Human Serum Albumin-TIMP-2 Fusion Protein Using Near-Infrared Optical Imaging. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2011;14:368–377. doi: 10.18433/j3h88d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kwon GT, Jung JI, Song HR, Woo EY, Jun JG, et al. J Nutr Biochem; 2011. Piceatannol inhibits migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells: possible mediation by decreased interleukin-6 signaling. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Park JY, Jung SH, Jung JW, Kwon MH, Yoo JO, et al. A novel array-based assay of in situ tissue transglutaminase activity in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Anal Biochem. 2009;394:217–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.07.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee S, Cha EJ, Park K, Lee SY, Hong JK, et al. A near-infrared-fluorescence-quenched gold-nanoparticle imaging probe for in vivo drug screening and protease activity determination. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008;47:2804–2807. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bremer C, Tung CH, Weissleder R. In vivo molecular target assessment of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Nat Med. 2001;7:743–748. doi: 10.1038/89126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Uemura S, Matsushita H, Li W, Glassford AJ, Asagami T, et al. Diabetes mellitus enhances vascular matrix metalloproteinase activity: role of oxidative stress. Circ Res. 2001;88:1291–1298. doi: 10.1161/hh1201.092042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Morita K, Lee MS, Her S. Possible relation of hemin-induced HO-1 expression to the upregulation of VEGF and BDNF mRNA levels in rat C6 glioma cells. J Mol Neurosci. 2009;38:31–40. doi: 10.1007/s12031-008-9156-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Steinbrenner H, Ramos MC, Stuhlmann D, Sies H, Brenneisen P. UVA-mediated downregulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in human epidermal keratinocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;308:486–491. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01430-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Storgard C, Mikolon D, Stupack DG. Angiogenesis assays in the chick CAM. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;294:123–136. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-860-9:123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Laemmel E, Genet M, Le Goualher G, Perchant A, Le Gargasson JF, et al. Fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy (Cell-viZio) facilitates extended imaging in the field of microcirculation. A comparison with intravital microscopy. J Vasc Res. 2004;41:400–411. doi: 10.1159/000081209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Armstrong JS, Davies JD, Hronkova B. Backprocessing paraffin wax blocks for subgross examination. J Clin Pathol. 1992;45:1116–1117. doi: 10.1136/jcp.45.12.1116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee MS, Kwon EH, Choi HS, Kwon SH, Lee CH, et al. Quantification of cellular uptake and in vivo tracking of transduction using real-time monitoring. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;394:348–353. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lai ZC, Wei X, Shimizu T, Ramos E, Rohrbaugh M, et al. Control of cell proliferation and apoptosis by mob as tumor suppressor, mats. Cell. 2005;120:675–685. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gomez DE, Alonso DF, Yoshiji H, Thorgeirsson UP. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: structure, regulation and biological functions. Eur J Cell Biol. 1997;74:111–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fassina G, Ferrari N, Brigati C, Benelli R, Santi L, et al. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteases: regulation and biological activities. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2000;18:111–120. doi: 10.1023/a:1006797522521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Higashi S, Miyazaki K. Reactive site-modified tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 inhibits the cell-mediated activation of progelatinase A. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:10497–10504. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.15.10497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wingfield PT, Sax JK, Stahl SJ, Kaufman J, Palmer I, et al. Biophysical and functional characterization of full-length, recombinant human tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) produced in Escherichia coli. Comparison of wild type and amino-terminal alanine appended variant with implications for the mechanism of TIMP functions. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:21362–21368. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.30.21362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Itoh T, Tanioka M, Yoshida H, Yoshioka T, Nishimoto H, et al. Reduced angiogenesis and tumor progression in gelatinase A-deficient mice. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1048–1051. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chetty C, Lakka SS, Bhoopathi P, Rao JS. MMP-2 alters VEGF expression via alphaVbeta3 integrin-mediated PI3K/AKT signaling in A549 lung cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:1081–1095. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kargiotis O, Chetty C, Gondi CS, Tsung AJ, Dinh DH, et al. Adenovirus-mediated transfer of siRNA against MMP-2 mRNA results in impaired invasion and tumor-induced angiogenesis, induces apoptosis in vitro and inhibits tumor growth in vivo in glioblastoma. Oncogene. 2008;27:4830–4840. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bourboulia D, Jensen-Taubman S, Rittler MR, Han HY, Chatterjee T, et al. Endogenous angiogenesis inhibitor blocks tumor growth via direct and indirect effects on tumor microenvironment. Am J Pathol. 2011;179:2589–2600. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.07.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fernandez CA, Roy R, Lee S, Yang J, Panigrahy D, et al. The anti-angiogenic peptide, loop 6, binds insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:41886–41895. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.166439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Igney FH, Krammer PH. Death and anti-death: tumour resistance to apoptosis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:277–288. doi: 10.1038/nrc776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Evan GI, Vousden KH. Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer. Nature. 2001;411:342–348. doi: 10.1038/35077213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Murphy FR, Issa R, Zhou X, Ratnarajah S, Nagase H, et al. Inhibition of apoptosis of activated hepatic stellate cells by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 is mediated via effects on matrix metalloproteinase inhibition: implications for reversibility of liver fibrosis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:11069–11076. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111490200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lovelock JD, Baker AH, Gao F, Dong JF, Bergeron AL, et al. Heterogeneous effects of tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases on cardiac fibroblasts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;288:H461–468. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00402.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rho SB, Chung BM, Lee JH. TIMP-1 regulates cell proliferation by interacting with the ninth zinc finger domain of PLZF. J Cell Biochem. 2007;101:57–67. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sun J, Stetler-Stevenson WG. Overexpression of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 2 up-regulates NF-kappaB activity in melanoma cells. J Mol Signal. 2009;4:4. doi: 10.1186/1750-2187-4-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hoegy SE, Oh HR, Corcoran ML, Stetler-Stevenson WG. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) suppresses TKR-growth factor signaling independent of metalloproteinase inhibition. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:3203–3214. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008157200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Murphy AN, Unsworth EJ, Stetler-Stevenson WG. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 inhibits bFGF-induced human microvascular endothelial cell proliferation. J Cell Physiol. 1993;157:351–358. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041570219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Folkman J. Angiogenesis and apoptosis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2003;13:159–167. doi: 10.1016/s1044-579x(02)00133-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Streit M, Riccardi L, Velasco P, Brown LF, Hawighorst T, et al. Thrombospondin-2: a potent endogenous inhibitor of tumor growth and angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:14888–14893. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.14888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shapiro S, Khodalev O, Bitterman H, Auslender R, Lahat N. Different activation forms of MMP-2 oppositely affect the fate of endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010;298:C942–951. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00305.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Preaux AM, D'Ortho M P, Bralet MP, Laperche Y, Mavier P. Apoptosis of human hepatic myofibroblasts promotes activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2. Hepatology. 2002;36:615–622. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.35279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hajitou A, Sounni NE, Devy L, Grignet-Debrus C, Lewalle JM, et al. Down-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2: effect on in vivo mammary tumor growth and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3450–3457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lee MS, Jung JI, Kwon SH, Shim I, Hahm DH, et al. A new bioluminescent rat prostate cancer cell line: rapid and accurate monitoring of tumor growth. J Life Sci. 2010;20:1738–1741. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Vaupel P, Kallinowski F, Okunieff P. Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review. Cancer Res. 1989;49:6449–6465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kim JB, Urban K, Cochran E, Lee S, Ang A, et al. Non-invasive detection of a small number of bioluminescent cancer cells in vivo. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.