Abstract
Background
Red yeast rice (i.e., rice fermented with Monascus spp.), as a food supplement, is claimed to be blood cholesterol-lowering. The red yeast rice constituent monacolin K, also known as lovastatin, is an inhibitor of the hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase. This article aims to develop a sensitive nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method to determine the total statin content of red yeast rice products.
Methods
The total statin content was determined by a 400 MHz 1H NMR spectroscopic method, based on the integration of the multiplet at δ 5.37-5.32 ppm of a hydrogen at the hexahydronaphthalene moiety in comparison to an external calibration with lovastatin. The activity of HMG-CoA reductase was measured by a commercial spectrophotometric assay kit.
Results
The NMR detection limit for total statins was 6 mg/L (equivalent to 0.3 mg/capsule, if two capsules are dissolved in 50 mL ethanol). The relative standard deviations were consistently lower than 11%. The total statin concentrations of five red yeast rice supplements were between 1.5 and 25.2 mg per specified daily dose. A dose-dependent inhibition of the HMG-CoA reductase enzyme activity by the red yeast rice products was demonstrated.
Conclusion
A simple and direct NMR assay was developed to determine the total statin content in red yeast rice. The assay can be applied for the determination of statin content for the regulatory control of red yeast rice products.
Background
The fermentation products of Monascus, have been used as food and traditional Chinese medicine for over 1000 years [1]. The products are called "Hong Qu", "Hon-Chi", "Anka" or "Ang-kak" in China and Taiwan, "Beni Koji" or "red Koji" in Japan. In Europe, the products are called "red yeast rice", "red rice", "red mould rice" or "red Chinese rice". It should be noted that the designation "yeast" is taxonomically not correct [1]. Red yeast rice is used as an additive for the colouring, flavouring and preservation of foods, which may be permitted in some Asian countries but not in Europe. Currently red yeast rice products are predominantly marketed as food supplements, primarily sold through the Internet [2].
Monacolin compounds are formed by Monascus during the fermentation process. They cause a reversible competitive inhibition of the microsomal hydroxymethyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase; thus, they prevent the reduction of HMG-CoA to mevalonic acid and the formation of cholesterol [2]. The major Monascus metabolite is monacolin K, which is structurally identical to lovastatin, the first statin drug introduced into the market [3,4]. The red yeast rice products that are currently marketed as food supplements differ from the traditional red yeast rice that is sold in Chinese groceries. The food supplements are manufactured using selected Monascus strains under carefully controlled and fully monitored conditions to increase the monacolin content [5].
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has recently provided a scientific opinion on the health claims related to monacolin K from red yeast rice [6]. The opinion was based on two double-blind, placebo-controlled human intervention studies, which demonstrated a significant reduction in total cholesterol concentrations in the red yeast rice treatment groups compared to the placebo groups [7,8]. Besides these clinical trials, other studies also supported the efficacy of red yeast rice [9-11], as reviewed by Liu et al. [12]. A study regarding cholesterol synthesis in human hepatic cells in vitro showed that the inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase was facilitated by red yeast rice preparations, like lovastatin [13]. The monacolin K prepared from red yeast rice was effective for the maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol levels [6]. As the EFSA [6] has not classified such products as food or medicine, the EFSA's opinion should not be interpreted as an approval of red yeast rice for food or medicinal use.
Red yeast rice is expected to have the adverse effects of its constituent lovastatin, including an increased risk of myopathy [14-18], acute rhabdomyolysis [19], symptomatic hepatitis [20] and anaphylactic reactions [21]. Drug interactions may influence liver enzyme expression leading to a lower clearance and elevated plasma concentration of lovastatin (e.g., by inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4) [19,22]. When lovastatin is administered with food, the intestinal absorption may be increased by about 50%, while pectin and oat bran may decrease its absorption [22-24]. The excessive use of grapefruit juice may inhibit CYP3A4 and lead to higher plasma concentrations of lovastatin [25,26].
Accurate determination of the statin content in red yeast rice products would be necessary for the regulatory control. Previous analytical approaches mainly used high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with diode array or mass spectrometric detectors [27-33]. Song et al. [34] suggested a flow injection tandem mass spectrometry for screening analysis. Chromatographic and mass spectrometric methods have some problems in separating over 14 monacolins and avoiding co-eluting interferences that could cause overestimation of the quantities of the analytes [34]. Furthermore, an equilibrium exists between monacolin K and its lactone ring opened hydroxy acid form (ratio between 2:1 and 3:2), which can be chromatographically separated [32]. For this reason, the total monacolin content should be determined for the evaluation of such products [28,32,35]. The exclusive determination of the lactone form of monacolin K could underestimate the pharmacological activity. Accurate quantification for the hydroxy acid and other monacolin isomers was difficult because of the lack of commercial reference standards [34].
In this study, we overcome these problems by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, which is advantageous for quantitative pharmaceutical analysis due to its high selectivity [36]. Dependent on the selected chemical shifts for quantification, such as protons at the hexahydronaphthalene moiety common to all first generation statins [37], the determination of total statins appears to be feasible with NMR without reference standards for each specific compound. A commercial HMG-CoA reductase assay kit was used to confirm the effects of the red yeast rice. The samples purchased over the Internet were evaluated by these methods.
Materials and methods
Samples and sample preparation
An internet search was conducted in November 2011 to identify the red yeast rice products that were offered at German speaking websites to German speaking consumers (for exact methodology, see Löbell-Behrends et al. [38,39]). None of the identified products was available in conventional retail stores. We purchased five different products, all were marketed to German consumers as food supplements in capsule form (i.e., the red yeast rice is provided in powder form inside a capsule).
For sample preparation, the content of two capsules (about 0.9 g) was dissolved in 50 mL of absolute ethanol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). An aliquot of 170 μL of this solution was mixed with 370 μL of distilled water and 60 μL of pH 7.4 NMR buffer (1.5 M KH2PO4 in D2O, 0.1% 3-(trimethylsilyl)-propionate acid-d4 (TSP), 3 mM NaN3). The mixture was poured into an NMR tube and directly measured. A lovastatin (Teva, Debrecen, Hungary) stock solution (500 mg/L) was prepared in absolute ethanol. For calibration, standards were prepared by diluting the lovastatin stock solution with ethanol (40% vol).
NMR Method
All 1H NMR measurements were performed using a Bruker Avance 400 Ultrashield spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany) equipped with a 5-mm SEI probe with Z-gradient coils and an Automatic Sample Changer B-ACS 120 (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany). All spectra were acquired at 300.0 K.
The NMR method was modified from our previous work for testing other products [40]. Two successive 1H NMR experiments were used for the measurement of each sample. First, the standard Bruker BioSpin water pre-saturation pulse program ZGPR was used to suppress only the signal of OH-protons. The relaxation delay (RD), and acquisition time (AQ) were set to 4 s and 3.99 s, respectively, resulting in a total recycle time of 7.99 s. After application of four dummy scans (DS), eight free induction decays (FIDs) (number of scans, NS = 8) were collected into a time domain (TD) of 65536 (65 k) complex data points using a 20.5187 ppm spectral width and a receiver gain of 1. The FIDs were multiplied with an exponential function corresponding to a line broadening of 1 Hz prior to Fourier transformation. Second, 8-fold suppression of water and ethanol was performed with the frequencies identified in the first experiment (Bruker sequence NOESYGPPS1D). The settings for the parameters RD, P(90°), AQ, and TD were kept similar to the ones from the first experiment, DS = 4 and NS = 32 were used and the mixing time (tm) was set to 10 ms.
The data were acquired automatically under the control of ICON-NMR (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany), requiring about 12 min per sample. All NMR spectra were phased, baseline-corrected and integrated using Topspin 3.1 (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany). For quantification, linear calibration curves were constructed from the lovastatin standards by integrating the multiplet at δ 5.37-5.32 ppm against TSP as an intensity reference. All measurements were done in five replicates including sample preparation. For 1H NMR spectral prediction, the software ChemBioDraw 12.0 (CambridgeSoft, Cambridge, UK) was used. The spectral prediction was performed according to Schaller et al. [41].
Validation of NMR method
For method validation, standard solutions and authentic red yeast rice samples were analyzed several times on one day (intraday, n = 5) and over five consecutive days (interday, n = 10). The linearity of the calibration curves was evaluated in the range covering the concentrations found in the investigated products. The recovery rate was ascertained by adding lovastatin standard solution at two different concentrations to a real sample. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were calculated from the residual standard deviation of the regression line [42].
HMG-CoA reductase assay
The HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR) assay kit #CS1090 from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA) was used. The procedure was modified from Perchellet et al. [43], and according to the manufacturer's instructions, with the exception of an additional dilution 1:3 in assay buffer to facilitate the use of standard 1 cm cuvettes (i.e., 3 mL final volume instead of 1 mL volume). The inhibitor solution (pravastatin) provided with the kit was used as positive control.
The red yeast rice sample solutions prepared for NMR analysis were used for the assay in appropriate dilution. Spectrophotometric measurements were performed on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 20 dual beam spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Rodgau, Germany) at 37°C. The spectrometer was operated with the Perkin Elmer UV WinLab software (version 2.85.04) in time drive mode. The absorbance at 340 nm was monitored at a time interval of 1.00 s for a total time of 15 min. The slit width was 1.00 nm and the response time 0.1 s.
Statistical methods
All data were evaluated using Origin V.7.5 (OriginLab, Northampton, USA). Data are presented as means and standard deviations among replicates. Linear regression analysis was used to compare NMR responses and concentrations. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results and discussion
NMR quantification results
NMR determination of lovastatin showed resonances at δ 6.05-6.01 ppm, δ 5.90-5.84 ppm, δ 5.61-5.56 ppm, δ 5.37-5.32 ppm, δ 4.39-4.34 ppm (mid-field region) and δ 2.85-2.76 ppm, δ 2.63-2.56 ppm, δ 2.44-2.33 ppm, δ 1.98-1.93 ppm, δ 1.64-1.57 ppm, δ 0.91-0.85 ppm (aliphatic range) through comparing the spectra of lovastatin standard solutions with the spectra of authentic red yeast rice samples (Figure 1). However, the resonances in the aliphatic range were unsuitable for quantification because they showed strong overlap with matrix compounds (Figure 1A, B). Considering signals in the mid-field region (Figure 1C, D), we used the multiplet at δ 5.37-5.32 ppm for quantification because this led to the best sensitivity and this signal was not interfered in any case in our samples. Thus, more advanced techniques, such as multivariate regression or curve deconvolution, were not required.
A spectral assignment of lovastatin was provided by Chen et al. [44] at 600 MHz in D-methanol, by Holzgrabe et al. [45,46] at 300 MHz in CDCl3, by Ahmad et al. [47] at 300 MHz in DMSO-d6, and by Lankhorst et al. [48] at 600 MHz in CDCl3. While our conditions are not directly comparable to any of these studies, the literature data along with own spectral prediction show that the multiplet at δ 5.37-5.32 ppm clearly belongs to an H-atom at the hexahydronaphthalene moiety (Figure 2), most probably H6, H4 or an overlap of the signals of both atoms. A final spectral assignment would necessitate further 2D experiments outside the scope of this work. The use of a chemical shift belonging to the hexahydronaphthalene moiety has the advantage that not only the sum of the lactone and hydroxy acid forms of monacolin K (lovastatin) can be quantified, but a sum of all statins that contain the hexahydronaphthalene moiety, including monacolins J, L, M, or X in red yeast rice [1,29,49] and other first generation statins (e.g., used as additives to food supplements) but not second generation synthetic statins [37]. We therefore referred the results of our method to "total statins", not lovastatin or monacolin content.
Table 1 summarizes the NMR method validation results for lovastatin. The 1H NMR assay was linear in a working concentration range of 5-100 mg/L (R = 0.98, P < 0.0001). The LOD and LOQ were 6 and 13 mg/L, respectively, which were equal to 0.33 and 0.72 mg/capsule if two capsules were dissolved in 50 mL ethanol. These results were suitable for estimating the levels of lovastatin in red yeast rice products. The method was further validated by repeated sample preparations of standard samples and authentic red yeast rice samples. For the standard solutions, all relative standard deviations (RSD) were below 8% (intraday) and 9% (interday). For the authentic samples, the RSDs were slightly higher but still below 11%. The method validation result shows that the method is sufficiently precise and reproducible and can be used for analysis of authentic samples (Table 1).
Table 1.
Parameter | Result |
---|---|
Investigated linear working range | 5 - 100 mg/L |
Limit of detectiona | 6 mg/L (0.33 mg/capsulec) |
Limit of quantitationa | 13 mg/L (0.72 mg/capsulec) |
Intraday precisionb | |
Authentic sampled | 10% |
Standard solution | 7.3% |
Interday precisionb | |
Authentic sampled | 11% |
Standard solution | 8.2% |
Recovery | 104% (at 50 mg/L) 113% (at 20 mg/L) |
a Limit of detection (LOD) and quantitation were determined by establishing a separate calibration curve near LOD. The limits were calculated from the residual standard deviation of the regression line [42]
b Precisions were expressed as relative standard deviation (%), intraday (n = 5), interday (n = 10)
c Based on a sample weight of 0.9 g (2 capsules) in 50 mL ethanol
d Total statins in authentic samples
Five authentic red yeast rice products were analyzed by the validated method. Figure 3 shows the NMR peaks of integration from all analyzed products (S1-S5) in comparison with two reference spectra of lovastatin (10 and 100 mg/L). According to the 1H NMR data, all five analyzed samples contained statins ranging from 1.5 mg/capsule (S1) to 8.0 mg/capsule (S5) (Table 2). The results were in agreement with the manufacturers' labelling for two of the products (S1 and S5; for the other three products no labelling was provided). The determined concentrations correspond to a range between 1.5 and 25.2 mg per specified daily dose. Three of five investigated products (S3-5) had a dose higher than the starting dosage of prescription (10 mg per day) in humans [50-52]. Our results confirmed the previous studies that there is a wide variability in total statin content among different red yeast rice products [28,35] as well as a lack in product standardization [33]. Four out of the five red yeast rice products analyzed in this study failed to comply with the current European Union food labelling and food supplements regulations.
Table 2.
Sample | Sample Labelling | Product origin | Total statins (NMR) | Labelling of monacolin K (mg/capsule) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(mg/capsule)a | (mg/daily dose)b | ||||
S1 | Red rice, food supplement, 330 mg capsules (in German) | Austria | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.5 - 4.5 | 1.33 |
S2 | Red yeast rice, food supplement, 600 mg capsules (in English) | USA with UK labelling | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 6.6 | no labelling |
S3 | Red yeast rice, herbal supplement, 330 mg capsules (in English) | UK | 5.3 ± 0.6 | 10.6 | no labelling |
S4 | Red yeast rice, dietary supplement, 600 mg capsules (in English) | USA | 6.3 ± 0.2 | 12.6 - 25.2 | no labelling |
S5 | Red yeast rice, food supplement, 600 mg capsules (in French) | France | 8.0 ± 0.6 | 16.0 - 24.0 | 9.6 |
a Means ± standard deviations (SD) based on 5 replicated measurements (including sample preparation)
b The daily doses were calculated according to our analytical result and the intake recommendation of the products (a range is given when the manufacturer recommended a range for daily dose)
HMG-CoA reductase inhibition
Besides monacolin K, red yeast rice may contain several different monacolins with statin-like activity. Figure 4 shows that the activities were almost congruent (e.g., compare lovastatin at 50 μM and S1 at 50 μM) when the total statin content in a red yeast rice sample was adjusted to the same molarity as a lovastatin standard. The inhibitory effect on HMG-CoA reductase was visually clear in Figure 4 to be related to the doses. In other words, the higher was the concentration of total statins in the red yeast rice, the greater the inhibitory effect exhibited. These results suggest that NMR can be used to determine the content of statins that would have inhibitory effect on HMG-CoA reductase.
Conclusion
A simple and direct NMR assay was developed to determine the total statin content in red yeast rice. The assay can be applied for the determination of statin content for the regulatory control of red yeast rice products.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
DWL conceived of the study, coordinated the work, and wrote the manuscript. YBM carried out the NMR experiments including data acquisition and analysis, prepared the tables and figures, and wrote the materials and methods section of the manuscript. TK supervised the NMR work and revised the manuscript. SLB conducted the Internet search, purchased the products and revised the manuscript. SM conducted the checking of the food labelling of the products. SM, MKH and AW contributed knowledge about the regulatory control of the products and revised the manuscript. CS conceived of the study on the red yeast rice products sold on the Internet and the use of the HMG-CoA reductase assay, contributed to writing the introduction and discussion sections, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Contributor Information
Dirk W Lachenmeier, Email: lachenmeier@web.de.
Yulia B Monakhova, Email: yul-monakhova@mail.ru.
Thomas Kuballa, Email: thomas.kuballa@cvuaka.bwl.de.
Sigrid Löbell-Behrends, Email: sigrid.loebell-behrends@cvuaka.bwl.de.
Sibylle Maixner, Email: sibylle.maixner@cvuaka.bwl.de.
Matthias Kohl-Himmelseher, Email: matthias.kohl-himmelseher@cvuaka.bwl.de.
Asja Waldner, Email: asja.waldner@rpt.bwl.de.
Christian Steffen, Email: chr.steffen@web.de.
Acknowledgements
The authors warmly thank Hannelore Heger for excellent technical assistance. The study was funded by a grant from the Ministry of Rural Affairs and Consumer Protection of the German federal state of Baden-Württemberg (Stuttgart, Germany). The funder played no role in study design, collection, data analysis and interpretation, report writing and decision to submit the paper for publication. This paper does not necessarily represent the views of the Ministry of Rural Affairs and Consumer Protection.
References
- Wang TH, Lin TF. Monascus rice products. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2007;53:123–159. doi: 10.1016/S1043-4526(07)53004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DFG - Senate Commission on Food Safety. Toxicological evaluation of red mould rice. Bonn, Germany: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [German Research Foundation]; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Henwood JM, Heel RC. Lovastatin. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic use in hyperlipidaemia. Drugs. 1988;36:429–454. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198836040-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tobert JA. Lovastatin and beyond: the history of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:517–526. doi: 10.1038/nrd1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Havel RJ. Dietary supplement or drug? The case of cholestin. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:175–176. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.2.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products; Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to monacolin K from red yeast rice and maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations (ID 1648, 1700) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA J. 2011;9:2304. [Google Scholar]
- Heber D, Yip I, Ashley JM, Elashoff DA, Elashoff RM, Go VL. Cholesterol-lowering effects of a proprietary Chinese red-yeast-rice dietary supplement. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:231–236. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.2.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin CC, Li TC, Lai MM. Efficacy and safety of Monascus purpureus Went rice in subjects with hyperlipidemia. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;153:679–686. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Becker DJ, Gordon RY, Halbert SC, French B, Morris PB, Rader DJ. Red yeast rice for dyslipidemia in statin-intolerant patients: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:830–839. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halbert SC, French B, Gordon RY, Farrar JT, Schmitz K, Morris PB, Thompson PD, Rader DJ, Becker DJ. Tolerability of red yeast rice (2,400 mg twice daily) versus pravastatin (20 mg twice daily) in patients with previous statin intolerance. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bogsrud MP, Ose L, Langslet G, Ottestad I, Strøm EC, Hagve TA, Retterstøl K. HypoCol (red yeast rice) lowers plasma cholesterol - a randomized placebo controlled study. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2010;44:197–200. doi: 10.3109/14017431003624123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J, Zhang J, Shi Y, Grimsgaard S, Alraek T, Fønnebø V. Chinese red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus) for primary hyperlipidemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chin Med. 2006;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1749-8546-1-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Man RY, Lynn EG, Cheung F, Tsang PS, O K. Cholestin inhibits cholesterol synthesis and secretion in hepatic cells (HepG2) Mol Cell Biochem. 2002;233:153–158. doi: 10.1023/A:1017487815091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polsani VR, Jones PH, Ballantyne CM, Nambi V. A case report of myopathy from consumption of red yeast rice. J Clin Lipidol. 2008;2:60–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2007.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lapi F, Gallo E, Bernasconi S, Vietri M, Menniti-Ippolito F, Raschetti R, Gori L, Firenzuoli F, Mugelli A, Vannacci A. Myopathies associated with red yeast rice and liquorice: spontaneous reports from the Italian Surveillance System of Natural Health Products. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;66:572–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03224.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith DJ, Olive KE. Chinese red rice-induced myopathy. South Med J. 2003;96:1265–1267. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000100117.79718.DC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prasad GV, Wong T, Meliton G, Bhaloo S. Rhabdomyolysis due to red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus) in a renal transplant recipient. Transplantation. 2002;74:1200–1201. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200210270-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mueller PS. Symptomatic myopathy due to red yeast rice. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:474–475. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-6-200609190-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mastaglia FL, Needham M. Update on toxic myopathies. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012;12(1):54–61. doi: 10.1007/s11910-011-0232-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-011-0232-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roselle H, Ekatan A, Tzeng J, Sapienza M, Kocher J. Symptomatic hepatitis associated with the use of herbal red yeast rice. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:516–517. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-7-200810070-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hipler UC, Wigger-Alberti W, Bauer A, Elsner P. Monascus purpureus-a new fungus of allergologic relevance. Mycoses. 2002;45:58–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lennernäs H, Fager G. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Similarities and differences. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997;32:403–425. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199732050-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vaquero MP, Sánchez Muniz FJ, Jiménez Redondo S, Prats Oliván P, Higueras FJ, Bastida S. Major diet-drug interactions affecting the kinetic characteristics and hypolipidaemic properties of statins. Nutr Hosp. 2010;25:193–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garnett WR. Interactions with hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1995;52:1639–1645. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/52.15.1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Messer A, Raquet N, Lohr C, Schrenk D. Major furocoumarins in grapefruit juice II: Phototoxicity, photogenotoxicity, and inhibitory potency vs. cytochrome P450 3A4 activity. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50(3-4):756–760. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.023. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bailey DG, Malcolm J, Arnold O, Spence JD. Grapefruit juice-drug interactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;46:101–110. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00764.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang HN, Hua YY, Bao GR, Xie LH. The quantification of monacolin K in some red yeast rice from Fujian province and the comparison of the other product. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 2006;54:687–689. doi: 10.1248/cpb.54.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gordon RY, Cooperman T, Obermeyer W, Becker DJ. Marked variability of monacolin levels in commercial red yeast rice products: buyer beware. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1722–1727. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li YG, Zhang F, Wang ZT, Hu ZB. Identification and chemical profiling of monacolins in red yeast rice using high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detector and mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2004;35:1101–1112. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chairote E, Chairote G, Niamsup H, Lumyong S. The presence and the content of Monacolins in Red Yeast rice prepared from Thai glutinous rice. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24:3039–3047. doi: 10.1007/s11274-008-9850-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chairote E, Lumyong S, Chairote G. Study on cholesterol lowering compounds in red yeast rice prepared from Thai glutinous rice. As J Food Ag-Ind. 2010;3:217–228. [Google Scholar]
- Ma J, Li Y, Ye Q, Li J, Hua Y, Ju D, Zhang D, Cooper R, Chang M. Constituents of red yeast rice, a traditional Chinese food and medicine. J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48:5220–5225. doi: 10.1021/jf000338c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heber D, Lembertas A, Lu QY, Bowerman S, Go VL. An analysis of nine proprietary Chinese red yeast rice dietary supplements: implications of variability in chemical profile and contents. J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7:133–139. doi: 10.1089/107555301750164181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song F, El-Demerdash A, Lee SJ, Smith RE. Fast screening of lovastatin in red yeast rice products by flow injection tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012;57:76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steffen C. Abgrenzungsproblematik. Klinische Studien mit Nahrungsergänzungsmitteln. Pharm Unserer Zeit. 2011;40:332–337. doi: 10.1002/pauz.201100428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holzgrabe U, Wawer I, Diehl B. NMR spectroscopy in pharmaceutical analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Kerpel-Fronius S, Fischer J. In: Analogue-based Drug Discovery. Fischer J, Ganellin CR, editor. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2006. Optimizing the clinical pharmacologic properties of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors; pp. 137–156. [Google Scholar]
- Löbell-Behrends S, Maixner S, Kratz E, Kohl-Himmelseher M, Bauer-Aymanns H, Marx G, Lachenmeier DW. Surveillance of internet marketing of borderline products (anti-aging and weight-loss supplements): A pilot study. Deut Lebensm Rundsch. 2008;104:265–270. [Google Scholar]
- Löbell-Behrends S, Böse W, Maixner S, Kratz E, Kohl-Himmelseher M, Marx G, Lachenmeier DW. Surveillance of internet marketing of food products - categorization of borderline products and concepts for effective control strategies. J Verbr Lebensm. 2011;6:385–393. doi: 10.1007/s00003-011-0687-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Monakhova YB, Schäfer H, Humpfer E, Spraul M, Kuballa T, Lachenmeier DW. Application of automated eightfold suppression of water and ethanol signals in 1H NMR to provide sensitivity for analyzing alcoholic beverages. Magn Reson Chem. 2011;49:734–739. doi: 10.1002/mrc.2823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schaller RB, Munk ME, Pretsch E. Spectra estimation for computer-aided structure determination. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1996;36:239–243. doi: 10.1021/ci950141y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- DIN 32 645. Chemische Analytik: Nachweis-, Erfassungs- und Bestimmungsgrenze, Ermittlung unter Wiederholbedingungen. Begriffe, Verfahren, Auswertung. Berlin, Germany: Beuth Verlag; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Perchellet JP, Perchellet EM, Crow KR, Buszek KR, Brown N, Ellappan S, Gao G, Luo D, Minatoya M, Lushington GH. Novel synthetic inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase activity that inhibit tumor cell proliferation and are structurally unrelated to existing statins. Int J Mol Med. 2009;24:633–643. doi: 10.3892/ijmm_00000274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen LC, Lai YK, Wu SC, Lin CC, Guo JH. Production by Clonostachys compactiuscula of a lovastatin esterase that converts lovastatin to monacolin J. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2006;39:1051–1059. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.02.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Diehl BWK, Holzgrabe U. In: NMR Spectroscopy in Drug Development and Analysis. Holzgrabe U, Wawer I, Diehl B, editor. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 1999. Analysis of Drugs; pp. 16–60. [Google Scholar]
- Holzgrabe U, Diehl BW, Wawer I. NMR spectroscopy in pharmacy. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1998;17:557–616. doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(97)00276-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad A, Panda BP, Khan S, Ali M, Javed S. Downstreaming and purification of lovastatin from Monascus purpureus culture. Thai J Pharm Sci. 2009;33:39–46. [Google Scholar]
- Lankhorst PP, Poot MM, de Lange MPA. Quantitative Determination of Lovastatin and Dihydrolovastatin by Means of 1H NMR Spectroscopy. Pharmacopeial Forum. 1996;22:2414–2422. [Google Scholar]
- Juzlová P, Martinková L, Kren V. Secondary metabolites of the fungus Monascus: a review. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996;16:163–170. [Google Scholar]
- Walker JF, Tobert JA. The clinical efficacy and safety of lovastatin and MK-733-an overview. Eur Heart J. 1987;8(Suppl. E):93–96. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/8.suppl_e.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamson M, Phillips G, Shen J, Lukacsko P, Friedhoff L, Niecestro RM. Pharmacokinetics of lovastatin extended-release dosage form (Lovastatin XL) in healthy volunteers. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2002;23:143–149. doi: 10.1002/bdd.304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shear CL, Franklin FA, Stinnett S, Hurley DP, Bradford RH, Chremos AN, Nash DT, Langendorfer A. Expanded Clinical Evaluation of Lovastatin (EXCEL) study results. Effect of patient characteristics on lovastatin-induced changes in plasma concentrations of lipids and lipoproteins. Circulation. 1992;85:1293–1303. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.4.1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]