Abstract
Brucellosis is a common zoonotic disease that remains endemic in many parts of the world. Dissecting the host immune response during this disease provides insight as to why brucellosis is often difficult to resolve. We used a Brucella epitope specific in vivo killing assay to investigate the ability of CD8+ T cells to kill targets treated with purified pathogenic protein. Importantly, we found the pathogenic protein TcpB to be a novel effector of adaptive immune evasion by inhibiting CD8+ T cell killing of Brucella epitope specific target cells in mice. Further, BALB/c mice show active Brucella melitensis infection beyond one year, many with previously unreported focal infection of the urogenital area. A fraction of CD8+ T cells show a CD8+ Tmem phenotype of LFA-1hi, CD127hi, KLRG-1lo during the course of chronic brucellosis, while the CD8+ T cell pool as a whole had a very weak polyfunctional cytokine response with diminished co-expression of IFN-γ with TNFα and/or IL-2, a hallmark of exhaustion. When investigating the expression of these 3 cytokines individually, we observed significant IFN-γ expression at 90 and 180 days post-infection. TNFα expression did not significantly exceed or fall below background levels at any time. IL-2 expression did not significantly exceeded background, but, interestingly, did fall significantly below that of uninfected mice at 180 days post-infection. Brucella melitensis evades and blunts adaptive immunity during acute infection and our findings provide potential mechanisms for the deficit observed in responding CD8+ T cells during chronic brucellosis.
Introduction
Brucella spp. are the cause of the most common zoonotic disease in man. There are approximately 500,000 new cases diagnosed each year, with endemic disease flourishing in the Middle East, Mediterranean basin, Northern Africa, and across the Asian continent. Human brucellosis is grossly under diagnosed as its symptoms are frequently similar to influenza and malaria, among others (i.e., fever, fatigue, headaches, general malaise, and myalgia) [1]. Vaccine development has continued for decades with limited success [2], [3], [4]. Recent advances in immunological methods and technology have made it possible to dissect the correlates of protective immunity in brucellosis, bringing much needed hope to the collective vaccine effort.
The immune response to Brucella infection is extremely varied and depends on the host, species or strain of Brucella, and environment. B. melitensis is a facultative, intracellular, and Gram-negative bacteria that is not contained by innate immunity [5]. The antibody response can lower the level of initial infection by the production of IgG opsonins but has little effect on the intracellular phase of Brucella. Macrophages kill 90–95% of all phagocytosed bacteria, which would appear to be a successful innate response, yet once the surviving few reach their replicative niche, successful infection of the host is all but guaranteed [6]. Over its extremely long history as a human pathogen, Brucella has evolved some impressive and redundant mechanisms to evade innate immunity [7], [8]. These include blocking activation of NFκ-B by mimicking a host protein, producing a non-reactive LPS, using phagosome acidification to its advantage, and inhibiting phagosome-lysosome fusion [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. These known mechanisms along with additional unknown disruptors of the adaptive immune response contribute to its low infectious dose where 20 bacteria ensure an ID90 in humans [15]. There remain many unknowns regarding the success or failure of the adaptive cell mediated response during active or chronic brucellosis. Although CD8+ T cells are considered critical to resolution of intracellular bacterial infections, few details are known as to why Brucella spp. persist in the presence of CD8+ T cells. Uncovering more of the particulars of the CD8+ T cell mediated response, for example specific surface phenotypes, factors produced, cellular interactions, and cytotoxic T cell killing of cells expressing Brucella peptides will provide needed insight for successful and safe vaccine design [16], [17], [18].
By limiting host cell death, an intracellular pathogen can prevent its own exposure to immune surveillance [19]. Infection with live Brucella leads to the prolonged life of host macrophages which are protected from apoptosis [5], [20], [21], [22]. Work in our lab on a cell permeable protein of B. melitensis, TcpB, has shown its targets to include multiple phosphatidylinositols, particularly those involved at the immunological synapse on the target cell side [13], [14]. When phosphatidylinositol (4,5) bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) is sequestered away from the synapse, the target cell is rendered resilient against CD8+ T cell mediated killing [23]. The functional capacity of CD8+ T cell effectors and the size of the memory pool can be dependent upon early antigenic, costimulatory, and inflammatory signals [17], [18], [24]. By inhibiting the killing of infected cells in vivo in the presence of specific cytotoxic cells, B. melitensis could effectively dampen the immune response, an insult resulting in a smaller and ineffective long-lived memory pool.
There have been recent advances in the broad understanding of CD8+ T cell memory (CD8+ Tmem), recall responses, and exhaustion [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. CD8+ Tmem cells exhibit stem cell like properties for example longevity, telomerase expression, self-renewal, and a multipotent state that is poised for activation [31]. Also, proliferative capacity of long-lived CD8+ T cells correlates with long-term vaccine efficacy [32], and the recall response mediated by these cells confers protection to a wide variety of infections [33]. A pathogen that evades or disables this response can successfully live long-term within the host, virtually undisturbed. Exploiting the recall response to overcome pathogenic insult via vaccine design may enable researchers to finally protect against low-level reactivating chronic Brucella infection.
During acute infection T cells have tight control of cytokine expression, with the ability for rapid on/off regulation [34]. Conversely, in chronic viral infection, T cells are present, but long-lived CD8+ cells lose their ability to produce multiple inflammatory cytokines in a stepwise manner as infection persists [35], [36], [37]. In-depth phenotyping and dissection of the multifunctional Th1 component of non-viral infections is underway, with recent work done in Mycobacterium, Salmonella, and Leishmania, among others [38], [39], [40]. This direction of investigation is crucial in understanding Brucella pathogenesis because functional cytokine exhaustion can lead to reactivation of senescent disease with the loss of immune control, as chronic presentation of antigen can induce CD8+ T cell tolerance [24], [37]. In human brucellosis, after intense antibiotic treatment of acute infection, reactivation of disease occurs unpredictably, even in otherwise healthy adults [41], [42], [43]. Brucellosis-acquired cellular anergy has long been noted; however, the mechanism behind this phenomenon is not understood [44]. Here we address the extent of CD8+ T cell memory phenotype and cytokine expression in the host response to chronic B. melitensis infection. Our overarching hypothesis is a defect or deficit in the quality of CD8+ T cell response to Brucella infection leads to a loss of functional CD8+ T memory cells permitting long-term Brucella survival.
Interestingly, a B. melitensis derived protein, TcpB, which possesses cell permeable properties, inhibits CD8+ T cell killing of pathogen specific targets. This stunting of the early adaptive response may play a role in the deficit seen in immunological memory during chronic brucellosis. In brucellosis research, BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice are considered prototypal susceptible and resistant animal models, respectively, where the primary site of infection is the spleen [6]. Here we show that the BALB/c mouse model of brucellosis more closely mimics chronic human infection than previously appreciated. We have unexpectedly found that BALB/c mice do not clear the infection and in fact, remain infected for more than 1 year. Surprisingly, B. melitensis can be cultured from BALB/c spleens up to 9 months post-infection and the CFUs show an undulation above and below the level of detection over time. The Brucella responding CD8+ T cells lack multiple cytokine production (polyfunctionality) while few cells retain a surface memory phenotype in the face of chronic infection. These CD8+T cell findings suggest an exhausted phenotype that would promote long-term Brucella survival.
Results
TcpB is a novel effector of adaptive immune evasion by Brucella melitensis
We have previously shown that B. melitensis TcpB suppresses inflammatory cytokines of the host including TNF-α and IL-1β [13], [14]. There is recent evidence that targets of TcpB binding, particularly the phosphoinositides, are involved in effector to memory transition signaling in CD8+ T cells as well as involved at the immunological synapse during directed CD8+ T cell killing of target cells [23], [27], [28], [45], [46]. To investigate the involvement of TcpB from B. melitensis in CD8+ T cell mediated killing, we performed an in vivo killing assay as described [47]. Briefly, naïve splenocytes were pulsed with the B. melitensis peptide NGSSSMATV with TcpB or maltose binding protein as a control and labeled with high Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) 5 µm [16]. Control splenocytes were pulsed with an irrelevant peptide of GFP with our without TcpB and labeled with a low amount of CFSE, 0.5 µm. Equal amounts of CFSEhi and CFSElo cells were combined and transferred (∼1×107 total cells/mouse) via retroorbital injection to anaesthetized syngeneic mice that had been peptide immunized 7 days prior. After 6 hrs spleens were removed from the mice and examined by flow cytometry for the expression of CFSE and compared to CFSE expression prior to adoptive transfer.
Interestingly, cells treated with TcpB were significantly protected from specific CD8+ T cell killing (Fig. 1A and B, p<0.001). This observation supports our previous findings that a deletion mutant of TcpB in B. melitensis produces a delay in mouse infection as well as elevated TNFα and interleukin-1β in TcpB-deficient Brucella compared to wild type bacteria [13]. This suggests that TcpB is a novel effector of adaptive immune evasion by an intracellular bacterial pathogen. By unknown mechanisms, the ability of the pathogen to block responding CD8+ T cell killing of specific targets may contribute to a long-term deficit in immunological memory.
BALB/c mice remain persistently infected with virulent Brucella melitensis
Mice (N = 200), in groups of 4, were infected with bioluminescent B. melitensis and bacterial load of the spleen was evaluated when mice were sacrificed at specific times post-infection (Fig. 2A). The undulation of bacteria above and below the level of detection over time suggests similarities to human brucellosis. Bioluminescent colonies continued to be cultured from the spleens of infected mice 270 days post-infection demonstrating the chronic nature of infection. No colonies were cultured from the spleens of uninfected age-matched mice kept in separate micro-isolator cages at any time during the experiments (data not shown).
Infected mice were also monitored for bacterial load prior to death via biophotonic imaging (Fig. 2B). Uninfected age-matched mice are shown on the right of each image. Bacterial luminescence was detected at 450 days post-infection, though becoming barely detectable at times, i.e. 150 days post-infection. Interestingly, biophotonic imaging was more sensitive in detecting infection after 270 days post-infection than the classical method of culturing bacteria from infected mice. Consistent with chronic human reactivating brucellosis, “hotspots” of infection outside of the usual bioluminescent urogenital location were observed in these mice long after acute infections. Note the central chest infection at 270 days post-infection and abdominal infection at 350 days post-infection.
The urogenital localization of bioluminescence was accompanied in some cases by edema (Fig. 3A–B), redness, and/or alopecia. The murine clitoral gland was consistent with the anatomic luminescence (Fig. 3C, D, E, F). Microscopically, an infiltration of mononuclear cells consistent with macrophages and lymphocytes was observed in the lumen of the gland. Occasional cells with pyknotic nuclei were present in the lining of the gland (Fig. 3G, H, I). Further study is required to determine if the cells in the gland or lumen contain bacteria.
CD8+ T cells with a memory phenotype are detectable in chronically infected hosts
Because brucellosis remains in a chronic state in BALB/c mice, the presence of a detectable CD8+ Tmem cell phenotype in these mice was uncertain. To address this void in our understanding, a combination of antibodies specific for CD3, CD8, LFA1, CD127, and KLRG1 was used to interrogate splenocytes. These markers can be used to distinguish naïve CD8+ T cells (LFA1lo CD127hi KLRG1lo), early effectors (LFA1hi CD127lo KLRG1lo), short-lived effectors (LFA1hi CD127lo KLRG1hi), and CD8+ Tmem (LFA1hi CD127hi KLRG1lo) [48], [49], [50], [51]. A distinct population of Tmem cells was detected in the B. melitensis infected mice (Fig. 4A). Analysis of the data revealed that infection with B. melitensis does have a very significant impact on the presence of Tmem cells, p<0.002 (Fig. 4B and C). Additionally, over time there was a downward trend of Tmem cells in infected and age-matched control mice that was significant, p<0.008 (Fig. 4C), most likely reflecting an age-related decline in immune function of older mice. Other controls included cells from infected and uninfected mice pulsed with irrelevant peptide and cells pulsed with no peptide (data not shown). The data were not significantly different from the uninfected age-matched splenocyte data at any time point. In summary, CD8+ Tmem are generated and maintained in mice with chronic brucellosis at significantly higher levels than observed in uninfected age-matched control mice.
CD8+ T cells are not highly functional during chronic brucellosis
A measure of quality in CD8+ T cells responding to infection, is the ability of a cell to simultaneously produce multiple cytokines [52], [53]. Multifunctional CD8+ T cells have not previously been examined in Brucella infection. Here, we examined the ability of B. melitensis responding CD8+ T cells to produce IFN-γ in concert with TNF-α and/or IL-2 (Fig. 5). Polyfunctional cells, producing 3 cytokines simultaneously, were near background values at all times examined except for a slight rise at 180 days and are not significant, p<0.06 (Fig. 5A). Dual function cells, either IFN-γ together with TNF-α or IFN-γ together with IL-2, also did not significantly exceed background at any time examined (Fig. 5B and C, p<0.7 and <0.8, respectively) supporting a lack of cytokine function by CD8+ T cells. It remains to be determined whether these cells lose function over time or never establish polyfunctionality during brucellosis.
IFN-γ expression of CD8+ T cells undulates in chronic brucellosis, while TNF-αα and IL-2 are not expressed significantly above background levels at any time examined
To further investigate the cytokine production of CD8+ T cells during chronic brucellosis, we examined the expression of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 independently of one another. Previously, we had shown significant IFN-γ production from CD8+ T cells during acute infection in response to specific B. melitensis epitopes [16]. IFN-γ expression of CD8+ T cells from BALB/c mice chronically infected with B. melitensis was low at 60 and 180 days post-infection (Fig. 6). Importantly, the cells were unable to respond with IFN-γ production at 270 days post-infection even in the presence of active infection shown by CFUs and biophotonic imaging (Fig. 2), as well as the presence of CD8+ T cells with a memory phenotype (Fig. 4, A, B and C). Infection did have a significant effect (p<0.05) on reducing IFN-γ production when examining CD8+ T cells (Fig. 6). Also, at 60 and 270 days post-infection, not only were the percentages of CD8+ T cells expressing IFN-γ less than PBS treated mice (Fig. 6B), but the geometric mean fluorescence of IFN-γ staining cells in infected mice was significantly less than PBS treated mice (p<0.0002; data not shown), suggesting suppression or lack of IFN-γ production in Brucella infected mice. Whether suppression of IFN-γ continues in an undulating fashion beyond 270 days of infection would be of interest in future studies.
TNF-α expression from CD8+ T cells does not significantly fall below or exceed background levels at any time assessed by examining CD8+ T cells as a ratio of splenocytes (Fig. 7A), as a percent of CD8+ T cells (Fig. 7B), and as a mean or geometric mean fluorescence intensity of TNF-α expressing cells (data not shown). Additionally, CD8+ T cell IL-2 expression was never significantly above background during this chronic period of infection (Fig. 8) when examined as a ratio of splenocytes to CD8+ T cells (data not shown), as a percent of CD8+ T cells (Fig. 8B), and as a mean, though IL-2 was significantly lower when examining the mean fluorescence intensity (p<0.05; data not shown). These results suggest that while surface markers showed a memory phenotype, the responding CD8+ T memory cells were of low quality and not functionally resilient. Additionally, B. melitensis may not just subvert these immune effectors, but actively suppress the expression of IFN-γ and IL-2 at certain times over the course of infection.
Discussion
BALB/c mice have long been used as the susceptible model of brucellosis, yet there remains the uncertainty that Brucella infection of mice may not be similar to a natural host [6], [16], [54]. Here, we present evidence of: 1) chronic infection in BALB/c mice for greater than 1 year, 2) a low level of CD8+ Tmem cells, 3) lack of polyfunctional cytokine production, and 4) the B. melitensis protein TcpB inhibits in vivo cytotoxic CD8+ T killing of Brucella peptide expressing target cells. BALB/c mice do not clear B. melitensis and show focal sites of reactivation. The undulating nature of the bacterial load should not be surprising considering that human brucellosis has also been known as undulant fever [5]. Histopathological study of the urogenital localization by B. melitensis in BALB/c mice compared to its prevalence in humans will provide insight into the local cellular response and environmental cues that allow such long-term persistence in this location [55].
During brucellosis the function of CD8+ T cells may be compromised by bacterial factors that contribute to poor immunological memory. Previous work in our lab had shown that a protein of B. melitensis, TcpB, binds to PI(4,5)P2 which is required at the immunological synapse on the target cell side for effective CD8+ T cell mediated killing [13], [23]. We observed that TcpB treatment of target cells inhibits B. melitensis specific CD8+ T cell killing, evidence that TcpB represents a novel effector of adaptive immune evasion. TcpB has also been shown to dampen NFκ-B activation, working as an effector of innate immune evasion. Also, the Brucella NV9 (NGSSSMATV) and RL9 (RYCINSASL) peptides that are recognized by the cytotoxic CD8+ T cell are naturally processed from intact Brucella in a mouse infection [16] supporting the relevant role of the CD8+ T cells in the present study.
An important concept that has not been addressed in Brucella research, is the effector to memory transition of effector CD8+ T cells. Maximizing the number of effectors that make this transition may improve long-term immunity to Brucella. Recently, the role of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in the effector CD8+ T cell transition to memory has come to light [27], [28]. Also, treatment of LCMV infected mice post-infection with rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor, surprisingly increased the quantity and quality of LCMV specific CD8+ T cells. This effect was reproduced in vaccinia virus Ankara vaccinated non-human primates [27]. The pathogenic protein TcpB of Brucella, can bind to phosphatidylinositol (4,5) bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) and PI(3,4,5)P3 which are present on the APC side of the immunological synapse [13], [23]. Also, both PI(4,5)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3 lie upstream of a pathway of mTOR activation in CD8+ T cells [17]. TcpB has a membrane translocation domain and may traffic between infected and uninfected cells [14]. Fig. 9 shows our hypotheses related to the action of TcpB and adaptive immunity. B. melitensis produces TcpB that contains a membrane translocation domain that permits its movement from the Brucella containing vesicle to the cytosol of the infected cell [14]. TcpB binds to PI(4,5)P2 either blocking its action or sequestering PI(4,5)P2 away from the APC side of the immunological synapse leading to the failure of CTL lysis of cells expressing Brucella peptides in the context of MHCI [23]. Also, the membrane translocation domain of TcpB would allow trafficking of TcpB to responding CD8+ T cells where it could disrupt FoxO and/or mTOR decreasing the transition of effector CD8+ T cells to memory T cells [17]. The resulting decline in functional CD8+ T memory cells is similar to our current findings. The level of TcpB expressed in vivo, whether TcpB is actively secreted, or if it becomes free in the cell after bacterial death are unknown. Additionally, determining if TcpB is disrupting, activating, or otherwise manipulating the mTOR activation signaling pathway may elucidate a mechanism behind the lack of protective memory seen in many Brucella species/host interactions.
The importance of inducing cellular immunity to intracellular pathogens is well established [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61]. A successful vaccine must elicit high quality immunological memory. Murine brucellosis is markedly exacerbated in β2-microglobulin knockout mice that lack CD8+ T cells compared to CD4+ T cell deficient mice or C57BL/6 (wild type) mice, illustrating the predominant role of MHC class I-restricted T cells in controlling Brucella infection [62]. Additionally, recent work continues the dissection of the cytokine and CD8+ T cell component of the host response to Brucella infection [63]. This is indicative of the importance of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in a protective immune response against Brucella infection. There have been extensive Brucella spp. vaccine candidates, but minimal attempts to characterize CD8+ Tmem that would be required to engender protection against brucellosis. Determining CD8+ Tmem presence and quality during chronic infection was undertaken to enable a needed measure of vaccine efficacy in future studies. Evaluating CD8+ Tmem when different Brucella strains and species are compared would provide insight into virulence and persistence of such strains and species. Future work will also address the adoptive transfer of memory and challenge experiments to further define the correlates of protective immunity.
IFN-γ is the cytokine best characterized for its involvement in brucellosis [64], [65], [66], [67]. A deficiency of IFN-γ enhances the susceptibility of mice to Brucella infection and animals die at ∼10 weeks of infection [65]. Also, DNA immunization with a Brucella gene produced high IFN-γ production but no protection and heat-killed Brucella sp. induce IFN-γ and IL-2 but not protective cytotoxic T cells [68], [69]. Here, we focus on the role that IFN-γ has as a measure of quality in CD8+ Tmem. Multifunctional cells, those expressing IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 simultaneously, are of central importance in the generation of durable protective CD8+ T cell memory. Experiments done with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine have shown an increase in the quality of the T cell mediated response to challenge when polyfunctional cells are present [70].
In Fig. 10, we introduce a model of CD8+ T cell functionality over the course of chronic reactivating brucellosis. The level of exhausted CD8+ T cells is based on our present cytokine findings that CD8+ T cells express only a single cytokine (IFNγ) and not additionally important cytokines like TNFα or IL-2 similar to exhausted CD8+ T cells. Similar exhaustion of cytokine production by CD8+ T cells is reported for other pathogens [17], [52], [53], [71], [72], [73]. Determining additional cell surface markers as well as transcription factor expression of the CD8+ T memory cells would further define this CD8+ T cell phenotype. Exhausted T cells tend to show a surface phenotype similar to effector T cells, including CD43hi, CD69hi, CD62Llo, CD127lo, and inhibitory receptors [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77]. Inhibitory receptors PD-1 and LAG-3 have recently become important targets of research, for example blocking the PD-1/PD-1L inhibitory pathway can boost immunity to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) but conversely, it may be required for a multifunctional protective response to Salmonella [35], [40]. This highlights the importance of dissecting the intricacies of pathogen specific cellular responses.
Future brucellosis vaccines will need to maximize high quality T cells that avoid excessive contraction after acute infection and avoid functional exhaustion during the chronic phase in order to induce protective memory. We show that chronic infection of BALB/c with virulent, live Brucella melitensis does not establish durable, high quality CD8+ T cell memory. CD8+ T cells responding to long-term infection produce primarily IFN-γ in an undulating pattern that temporally follows the level of bacterial load (Fig. 10). The lack of significant TNF-α expression has ramifications on the function and production of IFN-γ against active infection, which has been documented previously [78], [79]. IL-2 regulates granzyme expression and is important for the expansion of CD8+ T cells; therefore, minimal IL-2 expression would not favor CD8+ T cells responding to reactivation of senescent brucellosis. Endogenous IL-2 is also intimately involved in CD8+ T cell survival and proliferation, and considered a critical aspect of CD8+ T cell mediated protection [80], [81]. This work supports previous studies that have found reduced Th1 immunity in aged mice and humans suffering from brucellosis [82], [83]. Unlike the previous study in aged mice, young mice were infected in the present study and followed for greater than 1 year. Infected young mice have a robust immune system and, in theory, should be able to clear infection. However, such young mice did not clear the bacteria supporting the ongoing chronic nature of brucellosis. Also, during acute murine brucellosis antigen presenting cells could process intact Brucella and present the NV9 peptide to CD8+ T cells generating a robust cytotoxic T cell response [16]; however, in the presence of the Brucella TcpB protein cytotoxicity is inhibited and as infection progressed cytokine production by CD8+ T cells is reduced.
The findings presented here contribute to understanding the host immunologic response during chronic B. melitensis infection. The fact that biophotonic imaging demonstrates BALB/c mice do not clear B. melitensis has importance in vaccine and challenge studies. If Brucella cannot be cultured from spleens, that does not confirm the mouse is uninfected or has cleared infection. In chronic brucellosis of BALB/c mice the clitoral gland appears to be a site of frequent long-term infection and humans frequently have focal infection of the genital tract [55]. The tropism for the genital organs of ruminants may be related to the high concentrations in these locations of erythritol, a carbohydrate that allows Brucella to grow. Although in humans the concentration of erythritol in seminal fluid and prostatic secretions is far lower than that found in ruminants, there are high concentrations of other carbohydrates, which might explain the fact that genitourinary complications are also frequent in humans. Although CD8+ Tmem that are CD127+KLRG1lo are present long after initial infection, the cytokine response by these cells is weak suggesting an exhaustive phenotype of CD8+ Tmem that may contribute to continuing, chronic Brucella infection. Future work will investigate the role of TcpB in evasion of multiple layers of immunity and how this protein affects the lack of strong memory response.
Materials and Methods
Brucella melitensis
Bioluminescent B. melitensis GR023 [84] was grown in brucella broth (Difco) at 37°C with shakig.
Immunization of Mice
Female BALB/c mice (6–8 weeks of age) were obtained from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN) and housed in AAALAC approved facilities under pathogen-free conditions using protocols approved by the university animal care committee (number V0554). For in vivo killing studies, groups of 4 mice were immunized s.c. at the base of the tail with 50 μg of each peptide in PBS/10% DMSO emulsified 1∶1 in IFA, or IFA alone. For the Brucella specific immunological memory studies, groups of 4 mice were immunized intraperitoneal (i.p.) with 107 B. melitensis GR023 [84] to ensure establishing long-term infection without causing death. Uninfected age-matched mice were injected i.p. with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) in the place of bacteria. This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Wisconsin-Madison that evaluates the ethics of animal experiments (Permit Number: V00554). All in vivo imaging was performed under isofluorane gas anesthesia. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering, and animals were housed in AAALAC accredited facilities.
In vivo imaging
Mice were evaluated using biophotonic imaging as previously described [84], [85]. Briefly, mice were anaesthetized per AAALAC and institutional guidelines for a ten minute exposure in the IVIS Imaging System (Caliper LifeSciences, Hopkinton, MA). Images were collected and analyzed using Living Image (Caliper LifeSciences, Hopkinton, MA).
Surface staining and flow cytometry
Splenocytes from immunized and control mice were isolated and immediately stained with anti-CD8 (PerCP-Cy, Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), anti-CD3, anti-LFA1 (a.k.a. CD11a), anti-CD127 (17A2, 2D7, and SB/199, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), and anti-KLRG1 (2F1, Abcam, Cambridge, MA). Flow cytometry was performed on an FC500 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) with 500,000 to 106 events acquired. Data was further analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star, Ashland, OR) and Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).
Intracellular cytokine assay
Splenocytes from immunized and control mice were cultured in 96-well round bottom plates (1×106 cells/well) in complete medium in the presence of 100 μg/ml–0.1 ng/ml of purified MHC Class I peptide (>90% purity, GenScript, Piscataway, NJ), 10 μg/ml GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), with or without Concanavalin A (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). After 5 hrs, cells were surface stained with anti-CD8 and anti-CD3. Cells were treated with Lysis Buffer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) then fixed and permeabilized according to the Cytofix/Cytoperm manufacturers protocol, with a subsequent intracellular stain with anti-IFNγ, anti-TNFα, and anti-IL-2 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Flow cytometry was performed on an FC500 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Data was further analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star, Ashland, OR) and Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).
Protein purification
Expression and purification of TcpB was performed as previously described [14]. Briefly, Overnight grown E. coli BL21 cells harboring the pMALTcpB plasmid construct or pMAL vector was inoculated (0.1%) into 1L of LB medium with glucose (2 g) and ampicillin (100 µg/mL). The culture was grown at 37°C and induced with IPTG to a final concentration of 0.5 mM when the OD600 reached 0.6. The induced culture was then grown at 25°C for 5 hrs. Cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in sonication buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCI [pH 8.0], 1 M NaCI, 1 mM EDTA and 1X protease inhibitor cocktail (Pierce). Cells were sonicated and then centrifuged at 16000×g for 20 min to clarify the supernatant. The supernatant was passed through a column harboring 5 mL of amylose resin (NEB). The column was then washed with the sonication buffer followed by the same buffer containing decreasing concentrations of NaCI (750, 500, 250 and 100 mM). The bound MBP-TcpB protein was eluted with an elution buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCI [pH 8.0] and 30 mM maltose. The eluted protein was then subjected to Genenase I protease site to cleave TcpB from MBP followed by SP Sepharose (Sigma) ion exchange chromatography to remove maltose followed by concentration using a centricon protein concentrator (Millipore). The concentrated protein was dialyzed in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCI, 100 mM NaCI and 10 % glycerol and stored at −80°C as aliquots. MBP was used as a negative control.
In vivo killing assay
Splenocytes from naive BALB/c mice were cultured overnight with 50 µg/ml of purified TcpB or MBP as a negative control. As described previously [16], [47], control and experimental splenocytes were then labeled with 5.0 μm or 0.5 μm CFSE (high and low concentrations, respectively). CFSElo cells were pulsed with irrelevant peptide, GYKVAPAAL, (1 μg/ml) and CFSEhi cells were pulsed with NGSSSMATV (1 μg/ml) for 2 hrs prior to CFSE staining. Equal amounts of CFSEhi and CFSElo cells were combined and transferred (∼1×107 total cells/mouse) via retroorbital injection to anaesthetized syngeneic mice that had been peptide immunized 7 days prior. After 6 hrs, splenocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry for the presence of hi and lo CFSE-labeled cells. The percent killing was calculated as (1-(Ratio of Irrelevant:Epitope specific cells in naïve mouse/Ratio in immunized mouse)) ×100 [86].
Statistical analysis
To determine statistical significance, paired Student's t-test and ANOVA were performed on the data against the control using Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Suresh in the Department of Pathobiological Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine for his knowledge and insight that helped form this manuscript.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant 1-R01-AI-073558, 1-R21-AI-088038, the Great Lakes Regional Center of Excellence grant 1-U54-AI-057153, and Binational Agricultural and Research Foundation (BARD) US-4378-11 (to G.S.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Mantur B, Amarnath SK, Shinde RS. Review of clinical and laboratory features of human brucellosis. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007;25:188–202. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.34758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Montaraz J, Winter AJ. Comparison of living and nonliving vaccines for Brucella abortus in BALB/c mice. Infect Immun. 1986;53:245–251. doi: 10.1128/iai.53.2.245-251.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ko J, Splitter GA. Molecular host-pathogen interaction in brucellosis: current understanding and future approaches to vaccine development for mice and humans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:65–78. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.1.65-78.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Commander N, Brewer JM, Wren BW, Spencer SA, Macmillan AP, et al. Liposomal delivery of p-ialB and p-omp25 DNA vaccines improves immunogenicity but fails to provide full protection against B. melitensis challenge. Genet Vaccines Ther. 2010;8:5. doi: 10.1186/1479-0556-8-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Martirosyan A, Moreno E, Gorvel JP. An evolutionary strategy for a stealthy intracellular Brucella pathogen. Immunol Rev. 2011;240:211–234. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00982.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.López-Goñi I, Moriyón I. Horizon Bioscience: Wymondham, England; 2004. Brucella: molecular and cellular biology. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Capasso L. Bacteria in two-millennia-old cheese, and related epizoonoses in Roman populations. J Infect. 2002;45:122–127. doi: 10.1053/jinf.2002.0996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.D'Anastasio R, Zipfel B, Moggi-Cecchi J, Stanyon R, Capasso L. Possible brucellosis in an early hominin skeleton from sterkfontein, South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Celli J, Gorvel JP. Organelle robbery: Brucella interactions with the endoplasmic reticulum. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004;7:93–97. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Baldwin C, Goenka R. Host immune responses to the intracellular bacteria Brucella: does the bacteria instruct the host to facilitate chronic infection? Crit Rev Immunol. 2006;26:407–442. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v26.i5.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lapaque N, Forquet F, de Chastellier C, Mishal Z, Jolly G, et al. Characterization of Brucella abortus lipopolysaccharide macrodomains as mega rafts. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8:197–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00609.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Al Dahouk S, Jubier-Maurin V, Scholz HC, Tomaso H, Karges W, et al. Quantitative analysis of the intramacrophagic Brucella suis proteome reveals metabolic adaptation to late stage of cellular infection. Proteomics. 2008;8:3862–3870. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Radhakrishnan G, Yu Q, Harms JS, Splitter GA. Brucella TIR Domain-containing Protein Mimics Properties of the Toll-like Receptor Adaptor Protein TIRAP. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:9892–9898. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805458200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Radhakrishnan G, Splitter GA. Biochemical and functional analysis of TIR domain containing protein from Brucella melitensis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;397:59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.05.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pappas G, Panagopoulou P, Christou L, Akritidis N. Brucella as a biological weapon. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:2229–2236. doi: 10.1007/s00018-006-6311-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Durward M, Harms J, Magnani DM, Eskra L, Splitter GA. Discordant Brucella melitensis antigens yield cognate CD8+ T cells in vivo. Infect Immun. 2010;78:168–176. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00994-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Obar J, Lefrancois L. Early events governing memory CD8+ T-cell differentiation. Int Immunol. 2010;22:619–625. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxq053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Obar J, Lefrancois L. Early signals during CD8 T cell priming regulate the generation of central memory cells. J Immunol. 2010;185:263–272. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lamkanfi M, Dixit VM. Manipulation of host cell death pathways during microbial infections. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8:44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dornand J, Gross A, Lafont V, Liautard J, Oliaro J, et al. The innate immune response against Brucella in humans. Vet Microbiol. 2002;90:383–394. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00223-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Barquero-Calvo E, Chaves-Olarte E, Weiss DS, Guzmán-Verri C, Chacón-Díaz C, et al. Brucella abortus uses a stealthy strategy to avoid activation of the innate immune system during the onset of infection. PloS ONE. 2007;2:e631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen F, He Y. Caspase-2 mediated apoptotic and necrotic murine macrophage cell death induced by rough Brucella abortus. PloS ONE. 2009;4:e6830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fooksman D, Shaikh SR, Boyle S, Edidin M. Cutting edge: phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate concentration at the APC side of the immunological synapse is required for effector T cell function. J Immunol. 2009;182:5179–5182. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0801797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Arens R, Schoenberger SP. Plasticity in programming of effector and memory CD8 T-cell formation. Immunol Rev. 2010;235:190–205. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2010.00899.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Suresh M, Whitmire JK, Harrington LE, Larsen CP, Pearson TC, et al. Role of CD28-B7 interactions in generation and maintenance of CD8 T cell memory. J Immunol. 2001;167:5565–5573. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.10.5565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Singh A, Suresh M. A role for TNF in limiting the duration of CTL effector phase and magnitude of CD8 T cell memory. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;82:1201–1211. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0407240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Araki K, Turner AP, Shaffer VO, Gangappa S, Keller SA, et al. mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature. 2009;460:108–112. doi: 10.1038/nature08155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Araki K, Youngblood B, Ahmed R. The role of mTOR in memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Immunol Rev. 2010;235:234–243. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2010.00898.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A, Araki K, Ahmed R. From vaccines to memory and back. Immunity. 2010;33:451–463. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Singh A, Jatzek A, Plisch EH, Srinivasan R, Svaren J, et al. Regulation of memory CD8 T-cell differentiation by cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:5145–5159. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01045-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cui W, Kaech SM. Generation of effector CD8+ T cells and their conversion to memory T cells. Immunol Rev. 2010;236:151–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00926.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lin J, Somanathan S, Roy S, Calcedo R, Wilson JM. Lung homing CTLs and their proliferation ability are important correlates of vaccine protection against influenza. Vaccine. 2010;28:5669–5675. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.06.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zanetti M, Castiglioni P, Ingulli E. Principles of memory CD8 T-cells generation in relation to protective immunity. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;684:108–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6451-9_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Slifka M, Whitton JL. Antigen-specific regulation of T cell-mediated cytokine production. Immunity. 2000;12:451–457. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80197-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Barber D, Wherry EJ, Masopust D, Zhu B, Allison JP, et al. Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection. Nature. 2006;439:682–687. doi: 10.1038/nature04444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Freeman G, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R, Sharpe AH. Reinvigorating exhausted HIV-specific T cells via PD-1-PD-1 ligand blockade. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2223–2227. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mueller S, Ahmed R. High antigen levels are the cause of T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:8623–8628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809818106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rueda C, Marín ND, García LF, Rojas M. Characterization of CD4 and CD8 T cells producing IFN-gamma in human latent and active tuberculosis. Tuberculosis. 2010;90:346–353. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Darrah P, Patel DT, De Luca PM, Lindsay RW, Davey DF, et al. Multifunctional TH1 cells define a correlate of vaccine-mediated protection against Leishmania major. Nat Med. 2007;13:843–850. doi: 10.1038/nm1592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lee SJ, O'Donnell H, McSorley SJ. B7-H1 (programmed cell death ligand 1) is required for the development of multifunctional Th1 cells and immunity to primary, but not secondary, Salmonella infection. J Immunol. 2010;185:2442–2449. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Colmenero J, Suarez-Muñoz MA, Queipo-Ortuño MI, Reguera JM, Morata P. Late reactivation of calcified granuloma in a patient with chronic suppurative brucellosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002;21:897–899. doi: 10.1007/s10096-002-0848-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Franco M, Mulder M, Gilman RH, Smits HL. Human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:775–786. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70286-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vrioni G, Pappas G, Priavali E, Gartzonika C, Levidiotou S. An eternal microbe: Brucella DNA load persists for years after clinical cure. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:e131–136. doi: 10.1086/588482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Skendros P, Pappas G, Boura P. Cell-mediated immunity in human brucellosis. Microbes Infect. 2011;13:134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang Q, Guan KL. Expanding mTOR signaling. Cell Res. 2007;17:666–681. doi: 10.1038/cr.2007.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Markman B, Dienstmann R, Tabernero J. Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway – beyond rapalogs. Oncotarget. 2010;1:530–543. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Durward M, Harms J, Splitter GA. Antigen specific in vivo killing assay using CFSE labeled target cells. J Vis Exp. 2010;45:e2250. doi: 10.3791/2250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kaech S, Tan JT, Wherry EJ, Konieczny BT, Surh CD, et al. Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells. Nature Immunol. 2003;4:1191–1198. doi: 10.1038/ni1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Joshi N, Cui W, Chandele A, Lee HK, Urso DR, et al. Inflammation directs memory precursor and short-lived effector CD8(+) T cell fates via the graded expression of T-bet transcription factor. Immunity. 2007;27:281–295. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sarkar S, Kalia V, Haining WN, Konieczny BT, Subramaniam S, et al. Functional and genomic profiling of effector CD8 T cell subsets with distinct memory fates. J Exp Med. 2008;205:625–640. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lefrancois L, Obar JJ. Once a killer, always a killer: from cytotoxic T cell to memory cell. Immunol Rev. 2010;235:206–218. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2010.00895.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yi J, Cox MA, Zajac AJ. T-cell exhaustion: characteristics, causes and conversion. Immunology. 2010;129:474–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03255.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cox M, Zajac AJ. Shaping successful and unsuccessful CD8 T cell responses following infection. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010. 2010. 159152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Baldwin CL, Parent M. Fundamentals of host immune response against Brucella abortus: what the mouse model has revealed about control of infection. Vet Microbiol. 2002;90:367–382. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00222-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Colmenero J, Reguera JM, Martos F, Sánchez-De-Mora D, Delgado M, et al. Complications associated with Brucella melitensis infection: a study of 530 cases. Medicine. 1996;75:195–211. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199607000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Titball R. Vaccines against intracellular bacterial pathogens. Drug Discov Today. 2008;13:596–600. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sette A, Peters B. Immune epitope mapping in the post-genomic era: lessons for vaccine development. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19:106–110. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2006.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Purcell A, McCluskey J, Rossjohn J. More than one reason to rethink the use of peptides in vaccine design. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:404–414. doi: 10.1038/nrd2224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Mora M, Donati C, Medini D, Covacci A, Rappuoli R. Microbial genomes and vaccine design: refinements to the classical reverse vaccinology approach. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006;9:532–536. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sette A, Fikes J. Epitope-based vaccines: an update on epitope identification, vaccine design and delivery. Curr Opin Immunol. 2003;15:461–470. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(03)00083-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rappuoli R. Reverse vaccinology. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2000;3:445–450. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(00)00119-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Oliveira S, Splitter GA. CD8+ type 1 CD44hi CD45 RBlo T lymphocytes control intracellular Brucella abortus infection as demonstrated in major histocompatibility complex class I- and class II-deficient mice. Eur J Immunol. 1995;25:2551–2557. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Brandão AP OF, Carvalho NB, Vieira LQ, Azevedo V, Macedo GC, et al. Host susceptibility to Brucella abortus infection is more pronounced in IFN-γ knockout than IL-12/β2-microglobulin double-deficient mice. Clin Dev Immunol 2012: 589494. Epub 582011 Dec. 2012;589411 doi: 10.1155/2012/589494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ko J, Gendron-Fitzpatrick A, Ficht TA, Splitter GA. Virulence criteria for Brucella abortus strains as determined by interferon regulatory factor 1-deficient mice. Infect immun. 2002;70:7004–7012. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.7004-7012.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Murphy E, Sathiyaseelan J, Parent MA, Zou B, Baldwin CL. Interferon-gamma is crucial for surviving a Brucella abortus infection in both resistant C57BL/6 and susceptible BALB/c mice. Immunology. 2001;103:511–518. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01258.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Baldwin C, Jiang X, Fernandes DM. Macrophage control of Brucella abortus: influence of cytokines and iron. Trends Microbiol. 1993;1:99–104. doi: 10.1016/0966-842x(93)90115-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Stevens M, Pugh GW, Jr, Tabatabai LB. Effects of gamma interferon and indomethacin in preventing Brucella abortus infections in mice. Infect immun. 1992;60:4407–4409. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.10.4407-4409.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Schurig G, Sriranganathan N, Corbel MJ. Brucellosis vaccines: past, present and future. Vet microbiol. 2002;90:479–496. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00255-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Leclerq S, Harms JS, Rosinha GM, Azevedo V, Oliveira SC. Induction of a th1-type of immune response but not protective immunity by intramuscular DNA immunisation with Brucella abortus GroEL heat-shock gene. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51:20–26. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-1-20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Singh V, Gowthaman U, Jain S, Parihar P, Banskar S, et al. Coadministration of interleukins 7 and 15 with bacille Calmette-Guerin mounts enduring T cell memory response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J infect dis. 2010;202:480–489. doi: 10.1086/653827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wherry E, Blattman JN, Murali-Krishna K, van der Most R, Ahmed R. Viral persistence alters CD8 T-cell immunodominance and tissue distribution and results in distinct stages of functional impairment. J Virol. 2003;77:4911–4927. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.8.4911-4927.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wherry E, Ha SJ, Kaech SM, Haining WN, Sarkar S, et al. Molecular signature of CD8+ T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Immunity. 2007;27:670–684. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Fuller M, Zajac AJ. Ablation of CD8 and CD4 T cell responses by high viral loads. J Immunol. 2003;170:477–486. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Fuller M, Hildeman DA, Sabbaj S, Gaddis DE, Tebo AE, et al. Cutting edge: emergence of CD127high functionally competent memory T cells is compromised by high viral loads and inadequate T cell help. J Immunol. 2005;174:5926–5930. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.5926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhou S, Ou R, Huang L, Price GE, Moskophidis D. Differential tissue-specific regulation of antiviral CD8+ T-cell immune responses during chronic viral infection. J Virol. 2004;78:3578–3600. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.7.3578-3600.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Fuller M, Khanolkar A, Tebo AE, Zajac AJ. Maintenance, loss, and resurgence of T cell responses during acute, protracted, and chronic viral infections. J Immunol. 2004;172:4204–4214. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.7.4204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zajac A, Blattman JN, Murali-Krishna K, Sourdive DJ, Suresh M, et al. Viral immune evasion due to persistence of activated T cells without effector function. J Exp Med. 1998;188:2205–2213. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.12.2205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Jiang X, Leonard B, Benson R, Baldwin, CL Macrophage control of Brucella abortus: role of reactive oxygen intermediates and nitric oxide. Cell Immunol. 1993;151:309–319. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1993.1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Jiang X, Baldwin CL. Effects of cytokines on intracellular growth of Brucella abortus. Infect Immun. 1993;61:124–134. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.1.124-134.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Makedonas G, Hutnick N, Haney D, Amick AC, Gardner J, et al. Perforin and IL-2 upregulation define qualitative differences among highly functional virus-specific human CD8 T cells. PLoS Pathogens. 2010;6:e1000798. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Chowdhury D, Lieberman J. Death by a thousand cuts: granzyme pathways of programmed cell death. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:389–420. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.High K, Prasad R, Marion CR, Schurig GG, Boyle SM, et al. Outcome and immune responses after Brucella abortus infection in young adult and aged mice. Biogerontology. 2007;8:583–593. doi: 10.1007/s10522-007-9106-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Rafiei A, Ardestani SK, Kariminia A, Keyhani A, Mohraz M, et al. Dominant Th1 cytokine production in early onset of human brucellosis followed by switching towards Th2 along prolongation of disease. J Infect. 2006;53:315–324. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Rajashekara G, Glover DA, Krepps M, Splitter GA. Temporal analysis of pathogenic events in virulent and avirulent Brucella melitensis infections. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:1459–1473. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Magnani D, Harms JS, Durward MA, Splitter GA. Nondividing but metabolically active gamma-irradiated Brucella melitensis is protective against virulent B. melitensis challenge in mice. Infect Immun. 2009;77:5181–5189. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00231-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Ingulli E. Tracing tolerance and immunity in vivo by CFSE-labeling of administered cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;380:365–376. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-395-0_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Cox MA, Zajac AJ. Shaping successful and unsuccessful CD8 T cell responses following infection. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010. 2010. 159152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]