Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: Biomark Med. 2012 Feb;6(1):69–72. doi: 10.2217/bmm.11.100

Cardiac myosin binding protein-C: a potential early-stage, cardiac-specific biomarker of ischemia-reperfusion injury

Sakthivel Sadayappan 1
PMCID: PMC3339268  NIHMSID: NIHMS371774  PMID: 22296197

Cardiac myosin binding protein-C (cMyBP-C) regulates sarcomeric structure, as well as myocardial contractility, and its phosphorylation is known to confer cardioprotection. We recently showed that cMyBP-C is an easily releasable and soluble myofilament; dephosphorylation of cMyBP-C results in its degradation and release into the blood post-myocardial infarction (MI); and plasma cMyBP-C levels are significantly increased in animal models and patients with MI. Strikingly, the level of plasma cMyBP-C is significantly (twofold) higher than the gold-standard plasma cardiac troponin-I (cTnI). This editorial provides an opportunity to discuss cMyBP-C as a potential new biomarker signaling ischemia-reperfusion injury. It is, however, clear that defining cMyBP-C as a bona fide selective and cardiac-specific biomarker of ischemia-reperfusion injury, as well as validating precise plasma cMyBP-C levels, will require further studies using systematic and advanced proteomics methods.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses all conditions that are caused by a sudden inadequate perfusion of the heart. This can occur through a decrease of blood flow or increased demand to the heart. ACS includes ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and unstable angina [1]. Symptoms can vary from classic crushing chest pain that radiates down the left arm to non-descript jaw or back sensations. Every 25 s, approximately one American will experience ACS with an estimated 34% chance of dying within 1 year subsequent to the ACS event [1]. An ECG provides immediate diagnosis of STEMI, activating a fast 90-min treatment pathway from first medical contact to opening the blocked coronary artery (i.e., ‘door to balloon time’) [2]. However, ST-elevation could be due to other causes such as pericarditis, early repolarization and ventricular hypertrophy. More importantly, life-threatening NSTEMI/unstable angina can still be missed due to a nondiagnostic ECG. Furthermore, the incidence of NSTEMI has increased (from 126 to 132 per 100,000), while the incidence of STEMI has decreased (from 121 to 77 per 100,000) between 1997 and 2005 [3]. Moreover, NSTEMI shows greater 1-year mortality (18.7–27.6%) than STEMI (8.3–15.4%) [3]. When a patient presents with ACS, but without ST-segment elevation, a clinician has to decide on either an early invasive or conservative approach based on assessment of the patient’s risk [4,5]. Currently, this decision process can be difficult. The Timing of Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes (TIMACS) trial has shown that early invasive therapy decreases the possibility of death, MI and stroke in higher risk NSTEMI/unstable angina patients compared with standard care, with longer time to invasive therapy [6]. The American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines [4,5], the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score [4] and the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score [4] all require a positive circulatory biomarker as an indicator of high risk of heart attack. Consequently, biomarkers play a crucial role in risk-stratifying a NSTEMI ACS patient for proper care [4,5]. In this time-critical context, cMyBP-C has the potential to outperform cardiac troponins at identifying patients needing early invasive therapy and can be used to diagnose recurrent MI, which is not possible with troponins as they cannot diagnose delayed clearance.

Limitations of cardiac troponins

Professional medical organizations worldwide have agreed upon a universal definition of MI [7]. This universal MI definition prescribed cTnI or cardiac troponin-T (cTnT) as the preferred biomarkers to diagnose MI at values >99th percentile of normal [7]. However, elevation of cardiac troponins can be delayed by up to 8–12 h [4]. Highly sensitive cardiac troponin assays used for earlier detection only have sensitivities <85% for chest pain onset within 3 h of test; therefore, many MI cases will be missed within the first 3 h of chest pain onset at patient presentation [8,9]. Conversely, a wide range of positive predictive values (42–83%) will also produce many false positives [8,9]. Furthermore, lowering the threshold below 99% to increase sensitivity will further decrease specificity, resulting in even lower positive predictive values [8,9]. Thus, a need exists for a better biomarker to identify higher risk NSTEMI patients who can benefit from early invasive intervention [6], while avoiding performing potentially harmful procedures on non-ACS patients.

cMyBP-C: a new diagnostic tool for MI

The newest potential cardiac-specific marker for the detection of MI is cMyBP-C [10]. It is a thick filament assembly protein in the sarcomere that interacts with titin, myosin and actin to regulate the structure and function of the heart [11–15]. Specifically, cMyBP-C is responsible for the cross-linkages of myosin in the A-band region of the sarcomere. This is accomplished when cMyBP-C is phosphorylated by a number of different kinases, such as PKA, PKC, PKD, CaMKII and RSK [15]. cMyBP-C phosphorylation is necessary for normal cardiac function [11,16]. Moreover, phosphorylated cMyBP-C protects the heart from myocardial injury [13]. Recently, we showed that the plasma level of cMyBP-C is significantly elevated in rats 3-days post-MI and in human patients with MI compared with healthy controls [10]. We also showed that cMyBP-C is an easily releasable myofilament protein from cardiac sarcomeres, and sensitive to proteolysis post- MI in a phosphorylation-dependent manner such that cleavage of its N-terminal fragments can be detected in plasma [10]. Strikingly, the level of plasma cMyBP-C was twofold higher than cTnI in human patients with MI, suggesting its potential as a valid biomarker for MI. More importantly, with cMyBP-C levels twofold higher than cTnI, there is a greater chance of achieving >99th percentile separation from normal at an earlier time point, thus increasing both the sensitivity and specificity necessary to detect NSTEMI. N-terminal regions of cMyBP-C are very sensitive to proteolysis during the early stages of ischemia, resulting in a corresponding early release of N-terminal fragments. In fact, our pilot studies indicated that cMyBP-C fragments can be detected in plasma within 30 min of ischemia in rats. These results provide further early evidence that cMyBP-C is a promising biomarker for MI. However, while cMyBP-C does have the potential to play a new role as an early-stage, cardiac-specific biomarker, the time of release, half-life, peak concentration, association with severity of MI and post-translational modifications in the circulatory system still need to be determined.

I have been studying the structure and function of cMyBP-C since 1995, including the link between the MYBPC3 gene as a factor in the etiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and the association between cMyBP-C phosphorylation and contractile function. In the last several years, I have taken this research in a new direction by exploring the potential of cMyBP-C as a potential biomarker for detecting early MI. Strong arguments support pursuing this research. First, cMyBP-C is highly soluble and very sensitive to proteolysis and, therefore, easily releasable from the sarcomere [10]. Based on these attributes, it promises to be a robust and early indicator of MI, compared with thin filament proteins such as cTnI and cTnT. These characteristics have been elucidated in our most recent manuscript [10]. Second, the N-terminal region of cMyBP-C is functionally critical to its roles in regulating sarcomeric structure and myocardial contractility. cMyBP-C provides longitudinal rigidity of the lattice and stiffness of the sarcomere. The arrangement of cMyBP-C in the sarcomere is different from in other thin and thick filaments [11,16]. Specifically, myosin, actin, cTnI and cTnT are arranged in the vertical axis in the sarcomere, whereas cMyBP-C runs through horizontally connecting all of the thin and thick filaments. This horizontal orientation may provide unique accessibility to proteases, which is currently under investigation [17]. Third, the N-terminal C0 domain of cMyBP-C is a unique cardiac isoform that is exclusively present in cardiac tissue. This is important in the context of biomarker discovery because the N-terminal fragments appear early in the blood post-MI [10]. Finally, recent studies from my laboratory have demonstrated that dephosphorylation of cMyBP-C accelerates its degradation and cleavage of the N-terminal region, leading to early release into the circulatory system. Based on these lines of evidence, I hypothesized that the plasma cMyBP-C level, as detected as both a full-length peptide and fragment, can be a clinical champion and provide a more robust and error-free indication of MI.

Conclusion & future perspective

My group’s studies were dependent on the traditional sandwich ELISA to quantify the amount of plasma cMyBP-C; therefore, a sensitive tandem-mass spectrometry technique known as selective reaction monitoring (SRM) will be required to determine the precise amount of cMyBP-C in the plasma samples. The efficacy of cardiac-specific markers of myocardial ischemia or necrosis in heart failure remains unclear, but literature and technology in this area are compelling. Recent advances in the field of clinical proteomics and the application of innovative technologies, such as functional genomics and proteomics, have greatly accelerated the discovery, verification, validation and application of novel biomarkers, particularly cardiac-specific biomarkers, as the best way to titrate therapeutic intervention [18]. cMyBP-C is a large protein, and cleaved in many regions during proteolysis. Thus, to perform a systematic determination and validation of cMyBP-C as an early biomarker for MI, an ultrasensitive proteomic assay that can capture different regions of full-length cMyBP-C in one reaction is proposed. Specifically, the use of mass spectrometry-based proteomics has many advantages over antibody-based ELISA approaches, such as quantification accuracy, site specificity, sensitivity and a broad coverage of proteins [19,20]. Also, while traditional mass spectrometry attempts to detect all proteins in a biological sample in a shotgun fashion, SRM, as noted above, is highly targeted, allowing scientists to quantitate specific peptides of interest [18,21]. In fact, SRM is now routinely applied for the verification of candidate biomarkers from discovery experiments, ensuring that only highly qualified candidates move into clinical validation [22,23]. Moreover, the SRM approach will allow for greater sensitivity, specificity, quantitation and speed of evaluation of cMyBP-C as a biomarker candidate [22–25]. Future studies will demonstrate that the plasma level of cMyBP-C is an index of cardio-pathophysiological change, providing a tool for clinicians to more accurately diagnose and monitor ischemic injury, and for researchers to conduct biomarker discovery with novel proteomics approaches. These findings are anticipated to open up a new avenue of diagnostic and therapeutic investigation.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank F Leya, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA, and C Tong, Scott and White Hospital, Texas A&M HSC College of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA, for their critical comments.

S Sadayappan was supported by NIH grants 5P30HL101297 and R01HL105826, and an American Heart Association – Scientist Development Grant (0830311N). S Sadayappan holds a provisional patent to determine the risk factors associated with cMyBP-C degradation and release into human body fluid.

Biography

graphic file with name nihms371774b1.gif

Footnotes

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The author has no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as:

▪ of interest

  • 1.Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18–e209. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182009701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physicians: 2007 writing group to review new evidence and update the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, writing on behalf of the 2004 writing committee. Circulation. 2008;117(2):296–329. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.188209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McManus DD, Gore J, Yarzebski J, Spencer F, Lessard D, Goldberg RJ. Recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. Am. J. Med. 2011;124(1):40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.07.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation. 2007;116(7):e148–e304. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;123(18):2022–2060. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820f2f3e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, et al. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360(21):2165–2175. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2007;116(22):2634–2653. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D, et al. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361(9):868–877. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S, et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361(9):858–867. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Govindan S, McElligott A, Muthusamy S, et al. Cardiac myosin binding protein-C is a potential diagnostic biomarker for myocardial infarction. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2011;52(1):154–164. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.09.011. ▪ There is a need to identify early biomarkers that can reliably rule out acute coronary syndrome, yet detect myocardial ischemia in the absence of irreversible myocyte injury. This report aims for the first time to determine the efficacy of cardiac myosin binding protein-C, a sarcomeric cardiac-specific thick filament assembly protein, as an early circulatory biomarker for myocardial infarction. Many additional studies will be necessary to establish cardiac myosin binding protein-C as a true biomarker for heart attacks.
  • 11.Sadayappan S, Gulick J, Osinska H, et al. Cardiac myosin binding protein-C phosphorylation and cardiac function. Circ. Res. 2005;97(11):1156–1163. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000190605.79013.4d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sadayappan S, Robbins J. The death of transcriptional chauvinism in the control and regulation of cardiac contractility. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2008;1123:1–9. doi: 10.1196/annals.1420.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sadayappan S, Osinska H, Klevitsky R, et al. Cardiac myosin binding protein-C phosphorylation is cardioprotective. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103(45):16918–16923. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607069103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sadayappan S, Gulick J, Klevitsky R, et al. Cardiac myosin binding protein-C phosphorylation in a {β}-myosin heavy chain background. Circulation. 2009;119(9):1253–1262. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.798983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sadayappan S, Gulick J, Osinska H, et al. A critical function for Ser-282 in cardiac myosin binding protein-C phosphorylation and cardiac function. Circ. Res. 2011;109(2):141–150. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.242560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tong CW, Stelzer JE, Greaser ML, Powers PA, Moss RL. Acceleration of crossbridge kinetics by protein kinase A phosphorylation of cardiac myosin binding protein C modulates cardiac function. Circ. Res. 2008;103(9):974–982. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.177683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Luther PK, Winkler H, Taylor K, et al. Direct visualization of myosin-binding protein C bridging myosin and actin filaments in intact muscle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108(28):11423–11428. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103216108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Van Eyk JE. Overview: the maturing of proteomics in cardiovascular research. Circ. Res. 2011;108(4):490–498. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.226894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meng Z, Veenstra TD. Targeted mass spectrometry approaches for protein biomarker verification. J. Proteomics. 2011;74(12):2650–2659. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sheng S, Skalnikova H, Meng A, et al. Intact protein separation by one- and two-dimensional liquid chromatography for the comparative proteomic separation of partitioned serum or plasma. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011;728:29–46. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-068-3_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rodriguez H, Rivers R, Kinsinger C, et al. Reconstructing the pipeline by introducing multiplexed multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for cancer biomarker verification: an NCI-CPTC initiative perspective. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2010;4(12):904–914. doi: 10.1002/prca.201000057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fu Q, Schoenhoff FS, Savage WJ, Zhang P, Van Eyk JE. Multiplex assays for biomarker research and clinical application: translational science coming of age. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2010;4(3):271–284. doi: 10.1002/prca.200900217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fu Q, Zhu J, Van Eyk JE. Comparison of multiplex immunoassay platforms. Clin. Chem. 2010;56(2):314–318. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.135087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Toyama A, Nakagawa H, Matsuda K, et al. Deglycosylation and label-free quantitative LC-MALDI MS applied to efficient serum biomarker discovery of lung cancer. Proteome Sci. 2011;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-9-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Van Den Broek I, Sparidans RW, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH. Quantitative assay for six potential breast cancer biomarker peptides in human serum by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2010;878(5–6):590–602. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES