Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: Biotechniques. 2012 Feb;52(2):109–111. doi: 10.2144/000113801

Global analysis of RNA oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Anastasia McKinlay 1,3, Wayne Gerard 1, Stanley Fields 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC3339438  NIHMSID: NIHMS370611  PMID: 22313409

Abstract

Oxidative RNA damage has been linked to loss of RNA function and to the development of many human age-related diseases. Consequently, a need exists for methods to identify and quantify the extent of RNA oxidation on a genome-wide basis. We developed such a method by combining affinity selection of mRNA containing 8-hydroxyguanine with high throughput DNA sequencing. We demonstrate that this assay is suitable for detecting differences in the extent of oxidation between RNA transcripts. We applied this method to the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown under physiological conditions and in response to hydrogen peroxide, and detected significantly oxidized RNA transcripts.

Keywords: yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, RNA modification, RNA oxidation, 8-OHG modification, free radicals, hydrogen peroxide treatment


Formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is unavoidable in living cells. During normal physiological processes (such as respiration), 0.1–2% of molecular oxygen (O2) is converted to the superoxide anion (O2˙) (1). However, under oxidative stress, levels of ROS increase, resulting in damage to proteins, lipids, DNA and RNA. Cellular RNA is highly prone to oxidative damage (2). RNA oxidation has been linked to the loss or alteration of RNA function, and the accumulation of dysfunctional RNA might lead to the development of cancers and age-related degenerative diseases (24).

Several approaches have been used to measure RNA oxidative damage (4). Some are based on detection of 8-hydroxyguanine (8-OHG), the most abundant and deleterious modification, by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with electrochemical and UV detectors (5), or HPLC coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (6). Other approaches use monoclonal antibodies against 8-OHG in immunohistochemical or Northwestern methods to assess RNA oxidation in tissues and subpopulations of RNAs (7, 8). For example, using Alzheimer patients’ brain tissues, Shan et al. (8) isolated oxidized RNA via affinity purification with antibodies against 8-OHG and cloned the corresponding cDNA into a plasmid. Sequencing of a few clones revealed oxidative damage-susceptible RNAs, some of which had been linked to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease.

Here we describe a genome-wide assay to identify oxidized RNA transcripts that relies on the affinity purification of oxidized RNA on anti-8-OHG antibody-coupled beads followed by high-throughput Illumina sequencing of a DNA library prepared from this RNA. In parallel, we assessed total RNA abundance by construction and sequencing of DNA libraries from RNA that had not undergone the affinity purification for 8-OHG. Total RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain BY4742 (9) was extracted with hot phenol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and treated with Turbo DNase I (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), and then partially depleted of rRNA by an mRNA purification kit (Invitrogen). An aliquot of the mRNA-enriched total RNA was used for total RNA library construction (see below). Oxidized RNA was precipitated from total RNA with anti-8-OHG antibody (QED Bioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) coupled to Protein G (Invitrogen). Binding (75 µg total RNA to 25 µL protein G coupled to 2.5 µg 8-OHG antibody) was performed in PBS buffer in the presence of SUPERase-In (Ambion) for 1 h at room temperature with rotation. Beads were first washed two times with 500 µL PBS buffer with 0.04% NP40 (Invitrogen), transferred to a new tube and then washed twice again with 500 µL PBS buffer with 0.04% NP40 for 10 min, followed by RNA extraction with 200 µL phenol chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (Invitrogen). Approximately 2 µg of mRNA-enriched total RNA was immunoprecipitated by antibody-coupled beads. To estimate background binding, we subjected the same amount of mRNA-enriched total RNA to the immunoprecipitation procedure using beads alone. In contrast to elution from the antibody-coupled beads, which yielded ~400 ng of RNA, the elutions from the negative control beads yielded ~100 ng or less of lower quality RNA, suggesting that < 5% of the RNA applied to control beads bound. Approximately 50 ng of oxidized RNA and mRNA-enriched total RNA were fragmented (Ambion Fragmentation kit, Ambion) and used for strand-specific Illumina sequencing library preparation (10).

Strand-specific Illumina sequencing libraries were constructed from RNA isolated from two independent cultures grown in yeast extract-peptone dextrose (YPD) medium at 30°C to exponential growth phase (OD600 = 0.5–0.6). The cultures had either been left untreated, or were treated prior to harvest for 15 min with 0.5 mM hydrogen peroxide. After aligning reads to the genome, we filtered out low quality alignments and rRNA sequences. The reproducibility between the two biological replicates of immunoprecipitated oxidized RNA libraries, and between the replicates of the total RNA libraries, was robust (Pearson’s r2 > 0.99). Therefore, we merged reads from biological replicates and obtained four data sets: total RNA from the untreated and hydrogen peroxide-treated yeast, and oxidized RNA from the untreated and hydrogen peroxide-treated yeast (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sequencing data acquisition and mapping statistics

Library Reads
acquired
Reads
mapped
Percent
mapped
Unique, non-
rRNA reads
Unique, non-
rRNA reads (%)
Oxidzed RNA 64,581,760 57,775,230 89.46% 19,008,947 32.90%
Total RNA 68,738,128 61,787,617 89.89% 19,678,020 31.84%
Oxidized RNA + H2O2 75,142,091 65,930,518 87.74% 17,592,399 26.68%
Total RNA + H2O2 83,896,685 72,330,257 86.21% 23,539,861 32.54%

To define mappable bases we identified all unique 36 base sequences from both strands of the reference assembly. We defined mappable bases as all positions covered by these sequences.

Of the 6,300 yeast transcript models, ~40–55% were significantly expressed in either total or oxidized RNA libraries, as measured against the background from intergenic regions using a Poisson distribution (P < 0.01) (Table 2). For each significantly expressed yeast transcript in each data set, we calculated an RNA oxidation index as the ratio of normalized reads in the oxidized RNA to those in the total RNA. We defined significantly oxidized transcripts as transcripts with read density in an oxidized RNA sample significantly higher than in the corresponding total RNA sample using a Poisson exact test (Q-value cutoff of 0.001). This analysis revealed that 14% and 19% of the yeast transcripts were significantly oxidized in the untreated sample and hydrogen peroxide-treated samples, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2.

Significantly expressed and significantly expressed oxidized transcripts

Library Significanly
expressed
Significanly
expressed & oxidized
Oxidzed RNA 2,921 (46.40%) 892 (14.16%)
Total RNA 3,454 (54.80%)
Oxidized RNA + H2O2 2,444 (38.79%) 1,222 (19.40%)
Total RNA + H2O2 3,451 (54.78%)

Approximately 91% (815 of 892) of the transcripts found to be oxidized in untreated yeast were also identified from yeast subjected to oxidative stress, suggesting that these transcripts might possess features that make them vulnerable to physiological levels of free radicals. Treatment with hydrogen peroxide resulted in an additional 407 transcripts classified as significantly oxidized. Approximately 9% (77 of 892) of the transcripts were detected as oxidized only under physiological growth conditions. Some of these transcripts may represent nonspecifically bound RNAs, or they may carry the 8-OHG modification to regulate a step in RNA metabolism, such as stability, splicing, transport, or translational efficiency.

We examined the effect of oxidative stress on the overlapped set of 815 yeast transcripts identified as oxidized. We predicted that these transcripts overall should be more oxidized in response to H2O2 treatment. For each transcript, we calculated a ratio of its oxidative index in the H2O2-treated sample to that in the untreated sample. This analysis revealed that 594 out of the 815 (73%) transcripts had a ratio >1 (with all but one transcript having a ratio below 2), suggesting that these are sensitive to oxidative stress, whereas for 221 (27%) of the transcripts, the ratio fell below 1.

We explored the correlation between the extent of RNA oxidation and features of the RNA. To examine the correlation with RNA folding, we determined RNA folding energies after normalizing the minimum free energy of RNA folding (ΔG (11)) by transcript length (ΔG/length) (12). This analysis revealed a modest correlation (Spearman ρ2 < −0.372) between RNA oxidation index and ΔG/length, indicating that highly structured RNAs are less oxidized by ROS. Susceptibility to oxidative damage may be affected by RNA subcellular localization, because mRNA targeted to mitochondria likely encounters higher levels of ROS. We compared the RNA oxidation index with the mitochondria location index (MLR) calculated for 3106 yeast transcripts based on their association with free and mitochondrion-bound polysomes (13). We observed modest correlation between these parameters (Spearman ρ2 > 0.41). We observed no significant correlation between RNA oxidation and either RNA abundance, transcript length, or ribosomal density (14).

In summary, we developed a high-throughput method that is suitable to identify oxidized RNA species on a genome-wide scale, and applied this method to S. cerevisiae. Similar studies performed on RNA isolated from tissues of patients affected by neurodegenerative diseases might shed light on the role of RNA oxidation in these diseases.

Acknowledgements

We thank Charlie Lee and Jay Shendure for help with DNA sequencing. This work was supported by P41 RR11823 from the NIH. S.F. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Footnotes

Competing interests statement: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Brand MD. The efficiency and plasticity of mitochondrial energy transduction. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:897–904. doi: 10.1042/BST0330897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li Z, Wu J, Deleo CJ. RNA damage and surveillance under oxidative stress. IUBMB Life. 2006;58:581–588. doi: 10.1080/15216540600946456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Radak Z, Boldogh I. 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine: links to gene expression, aging, and defense against oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;49:587–596. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wurtmann EJ, Wolin SL. RNA under attack: cellular handling of RNA damage. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;44:34–49. doi: 10.1080/10409230802594043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shen Z, Wu W, Hazen SL. Activated leukocytes oxidatively damage DNA, RNA, and the nucleotide pool through halide-dependent formation of hydroxyl radical. Biochemistry. 2000;39:5474–5482. doi: 10.1021/bi992809y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Weimann A, Belling D, Poulsen HE. Quantification of 8-oxo-guanine and guanine as the nucleobase, nucleoside and deoxynucleoside forms in human urine by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:E7. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.2.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nunomura A, Perry G, Pappolla MA, Wade R, Hirai K, Chiba S, Smith MA. RNA oxidation is a prominent feature of vulnerable neurons in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 1999;19:1959–1964. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-06-01959.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shan X, Tashiro H, Lin CL. The identification and characterization of oxidized RNAs in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2003;23:4913–4921. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-04913.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, Caputo E, Li J, Hieter P, Boeke JD. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast. 1998;14:115–132. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130)14:2<115::AID-YEA204>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Parkhomchuk D, Borodina T, Amstislavskiy V, Banaru M, Hallen L, Krobitsch S, Lehrach H, Soldatov A. Transcriptome analysis by strand-specific sequencing of complementary DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:e123. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hofacker IL. Vienna RNA secondary structure server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3429–3431. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Freyhult E, Gardner PP, Moulton V. A comparison of RNA folding measures. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:241. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Marc P, Margeot A, Devaux F, Blugeon C, Corral-Debrinski M, Jacq C. Genome-wide analysis of mRNAs targeted to yeast mitochondria. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:159–164. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JR, Weissman JS. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science. 2009;324:218–223. doi: 10.1126/science.1168978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES