Skip to main content
Acta Orthopaedica logoLink to Acta Orthopaedica
. 2012 Apr 24;83(2):148–152. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.652889

No adverse effects of submelt-annealed highly crosslinked polyethylene in cemented cups

An RSA study of 8 patients 10 years after surgery

Stephan M Röhrl 1, Bo Nivbrant 2, Kjell G Nilsson 3
PMCID: PMC3339528  PMID: 22248172

Abstract

Background and purpose

Highly crosslinked polyethylene (PE) is in standard use worldwide. Differences in the crosslinking procedure may affect the clinical performance. Experimenatal data from retrieved cups have shown free radicals and excessive wear of annealed highly crosslinked PE. We have previously reported low wear and good clinical performance after 6 years with this implant, and now report on the 10-year results.

Patients and methods

In 8 patients, we measured wear of annealed highly crosslinked PE prospectively with radiostereometry after 10 years. Activity was assessed by UCLA activity score and a specifically designed activity score. Conventional radiographs were evaluated for osteolysis and clinical outcome by the Harris hip score (HHS).

Results

The mean (95% CI) proximal head penetration for highly crosslinked PE after 10 years was 0.07 (–0.015 to 0.153) mm, and the 3D wear was 0.2 (0.026 to 0.36) mm. Without creep, proximal head penetration was 0.02 (–0.026 to 0.066) mm and for 3D penetration was 0.016 (–0.47 to 0.08) mm. This represents an annual proximal wear of less than 2 µm. All cups were clinically and radiographically stable but showed a tendency of increased rotation after 5 years.

Interpretation

Wear for annealed highly crosslinked PE is extremely low up to 10 years. Free radicals do not affect mechanical performance or lead to clinically adverse effects. Creep stops after the first 6 months after implantation. Highly crosslinked PE is a true competitor of hard-on-hard bearings.


Highly crosslinked polyethylene (PE) has become a standard option in acetabular cups. Long-term results are still not available, since modern highly crosslinked PE (HXLPE) was introduced into the market around the shift of the millennium (Thomas et al. 2011). Fuelled by the debate about degradation through free radicals (Currier et al. 2007) and preservation of mechanical properties (Tower et al. 2007), there are at least 9 different highly crosslinked PEs with different production protocols commercially available. Although early pilot studies with HXLPE (Oonishi et al. 1998, Grobbelar et al. 1999. Wroblewski et al. 1999) with annealed or remelt-stabilized PE have shown good clinical results, modern first-generation HXLPE was introduced by McKellop (1999) and by Kurtz et al. (1999) in the late 1990s. Since then, second-generation HXLPE with either additives (vitamin E), mechanical enhancement (Kurtz et al. 2006a), or a sequential annealing process have been introduced and promise further improvement. Although HXLPE is in clinical use globally, little is known about the oxidative in vivo stability of these new polyethylenes (Muratoglu et al. 2010).

Concerns with annealed (non-remelted) HXLPE are free radicals trapped in the matrix, leading to degradation and excessive wear (Kurtz et al. 2006b, 2011). However, this is not supported by clinical data. So far, it appears that HXLPE reduces the risk of osteolysis (Digas et al. 2007, Jacobs et al. 2007, Callaghan et al. 2008, Kurtz et al. 2011). At the same time, alarming results with increased wear have been reported with remelted HXLPE from retrievals (Muratoglu et al. 2010).

We therefore measured femoral head penetration in a cohort with annealed first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene with radiostereometry. Femoral head penetration is a substitute for in vivo wear measurement (Valstar et al. 2005, Bragdon et al. 2006). We consider it important to report on the 10-year wear measurement for 5 reasons: (1) we used RSA, a high-precision measuring method (Valstar et al. 2005), (2) retrieval studies have shown increased degradation of this HXLPE from oxidation (Currier et al 2007), (3) other HXLPEs have shown increasing wear after 5 years, (4) serum protein may influence wear performance negatively in the long term (St. John 2009), and (5) HXLPE is the most commonly used bearing material in THA worldwide. We therefore update our previous 6-year report on submelt-annealed crosslinked PE (Röhrl et al. 2005, 2007) with 10-year data on wear and clinical outcome.

Patients and method

In 2000, 10 hips in 10 patients were operated consecutively with annealed highly crosslinked polyethylene cups. The patients had a mean age of 61 (49–79) years. We refer to Röhrl et al. (2005, 2007) for further information regarding the surgical technique and information about the patients.

The patients received an all-polyethylene Osteonics (Stryker) cup made of Crossfire PE. This PE of GUR 1050 is highly crosslinked by irradiation with 7.5 Mrad, heat-annealed below melting temperature (120°C), and finally sterilized by irradiation with 2.5 Mrad, all in an inert atmosphere. All cups were cemented (Palacos with gentamicin) and combined with Exeter femoral stems with 28-mm metal heads.

The patients were examined with RSA at 2 months after surgery and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 10 years. Analyses of wear and migration were done with the UmRSA system (RSA Biomedical, Umeå, Sweden). In accordance with earlier measurements (Röhrl et al. 2005, 2007), wear was measured and expressed as the proximal head penetration. Initial creep during the wear-in period was eliminated by subtracting the mean of the early (2-month) measurement from the mean of the 10-year measurement in each patient.

Patients were assessed with Harris hip score before surgery, at 2 years, and at the last visit. Activity was evaluated with UCLA activity score and also from the patient’s subjective perception of activity rated as very low, low, normal, high, or very high at 10 years.

Conventional radiographs were taken postoperatively, and at 2, 5, and 7 years. In order to reduce radiation exposure at the last follow–up, conventional radiographs were taken only if the patient had clinical symptoms suggesting loosening. The percentage of the cup interface covered by a radiolucent line (RLL) more than 1 mm wide was assessed together with inclination and position of the cup. Before the 10-year follow-up, 1 patient had died from causes unrelated to the arthroplasty and with his prosthesis unrevised. 1 patient was critically ill and was not available for the follow-up. This left 8 patients for clinical, radiographic, and radiostereometric evaluation. All patients had good-quality radiographs. The precision for proximal wear was 0.09 mm, expressed as absolute mean penetration + 1.96 SD (Valstar et al. 2005). Table 1 shows the precision for all cardinal planes.

Table 1.

Precision of wear, translation, and rotation

Axis Translation (mm) Rotation (°) Wear
x 0.30 0.47
y 0.39 0.49 0.09
z 0.19 0.22
3D 0.31

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Umeå, Sweden.

Statistics

Changes in wear over time were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test (comparing longitudinal changes within the group). To eliminate creep, the 2-month penetration was subtracted for each patient individually. Changes over time were tested with related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results

Wear

The mean (95% CI) proximal head penetration for highly crosslinked PE after 10 years was 0.07 (–0.015 to 0.153) mm (Figure 1), whereas the 3D penetration was 0.2 (0.026–0.36) mm (Figure 2). Mean head penetration was 0.09 (–0.02 to 0.02) mm posterior and 0.07 (–0.087 to 0.22) mm medially. Subtracting the initial 2-month creep, the resulting mean proximal head penetration at 10 years was 0.02 (–0.026 to 0.066) mm and mean 3D wear was 0.016 (–0.47 to 0.08) mm. This corresponds to a proximal annual wear for crosslinked PE of less than 2 µm/year.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Proximal penetration/wear for the individual patients (colored lines) and the mean (black line) with 95% CI (whiskers).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

3-dimensional penetration/wear for the individual patients (colored lines) and the mean (black line) with 95% CI (whiskers).

Considering the first 2–3 months mainly as wear, changes from 3 months onwards up to 10 years were not statistically significant for proximal head penetration (p = 0.3) or for total head penetration (p = 0.6).

Cup stability

The cups showed no statistically significant movement in any cardinal direction compared to the 2-month and 6-year positions (Figure 3). Mean 3D migration of all cups slightly increased after 7 years from 0.35 (0.097–0.598) to 0.44 (0.12–0.761) (p = 0.1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Mean total migration (black line) with 95% CI (whiskers) and mean translation/rotation in each plane for all cups up to 10 years. The cups were stable for translations, but we saw an increase in inclination after 7 years. In accordance with this, 3D motion increased after 7 years (black line). The change was not statistically significant.

Clinical outcome

None of the 8 patients had pain in the operated hip. 5 patients participated regularly in activities such as bicycling, golf, or bowling (Table 2). 1 patient had low activity as a consequence of 3 cerebral strokes.

Table 2.

Clinical data for all patients with clinical outcome (HHS, UCLA score, and individual perception of activity level). Patients 3 and 10 were excluded from the 10-year follow-up

A B C D E F G H I J
 1 male 69 Stroke x 3 70 51 44 76 3 low
 2 female 67 no 70 49 44 91 6 low
 3 male 89 Died 49
 4 male 66 no 62 54 44 100 8 normal
 5 female 65 no 60 64 44 100 8 high
 6 female 64 no 65 43 44 100 7 high
 7 male 78 no 75 54 44 93 6 normal
 8 female 70 no 87 51 44 98 7 normal
 9 male 86 no 90 63 44 95 8 normal
10 male 59 Alcohol-related disease 28
Total 72 50 44 96 6.3
(SD) (11) (10) (12 ) (1.6)

A Patient no.

B Sex

C Age at follow-up

D Complication

E Weight (10 y)

F Cup inclination

G Pain (HHS)

H HHS

I UCLA

J Activity perception

Discussion

Since the introduction of highly crosslinked PE, there has been an ongoing discussion about whether the free radicals that are scarcely trapped in the annealed PE would lead to degeneration and cause inferior performance of the PE. Excessive wear of annealed HXLPE has been detected in various retrieval studies (Kurz et al. 2006b, Wannomae et al. 2006, Currier et al. 2007). In accordance with earlier clinical studies reporting on PE full of free radicals (Oonshii et al.1998), we found hardly any wear in the cemented cups with annealed highly crosslinked PE at 10 years. The clinical outcome was excellent.

The cups seemed to be stable when looking at the movement in each single plane, although the 3D migration increased slightly after 7 years. One explanation may be the biological reaction at the interface between the cement and the bone. As there is no direct ingrowth of bone into PE, this zone is slowly transformed into a fibrous layer (Schmalzried et al. 1992, Ryd et al. 1999). High wear has been a confounding factor when evaluating stability in cemented components with oxidation-prone conventional UHMWPE. It is possible that the interface is remodeled to a fibrous layer even without wear particles as a trigger. Another explanation might be methodological, as the stability of the segment (rigid body) defined by the markers within the acetabulum decreases over time. After 10 years, some of the tantalum balls might have moved slightly within the bone—leading to an increase in quantitative movement when reconstructing all planes. Clinically, there were no signs of loosening or failure.

Severe oxidation occurs about 1–3 mm beneath the surface. It was therefore predicted by Kurtz et al. (2006b) that when the surface layer has worn off after about 10 years, excessive wear will ensue. Our findings do not support this prediction. Most of the oxidation after implantation supposedly occurs in the non-bearing part of the cup, hence the rim. Kurtz et al. (2006b) also postulated that the weight-bearing part of the polyethylene is protected by the femoral head from oxidation. As long as this contact area has little wear, the cups perform well.

Increased fatigue crack propagation of remelted HXLPE compared to conventional UHMWPE was an early concern based on experimental data. So far, no detrimental results with HXLPE cups have been reported (Jacobs et al. 2007). Recent clinical data by Kurtz et al. (2011) and Capello et al. (2011) have suggested that there is no difference between remelted and annealed highly crosslinked polyethylene after 10 years. In a meta-analysis, Kuzyk et al. (2011) found reduced wear for highly crosslinked polyethylene but they could not conclude that this had an effect on revision rate.

Our measurements during the first postoperative year indicate that creep happens during the first postoperative months. After 3 months, penetration of the femoral head is almost negligible. After 1 year, no penetration is measurable up to 10 years. We have commented on this in our earlier publications (Röhrl et al. 2007). Anticipating low wear in the early postoperative phase because of low activity, we consider that our measurements adequately describe creep of annealed highly crosslinked PE. Our findings are similar to those of Glyn-Jones et al. (2008). 1 patient (no. 5 in Figures 1 and 2) showed more proximal head penetration for all measurements, compared to the others. The penetration did not increase with time, however. The exact reason for this is unclear, but possible explanations are joint laxity or interposed soft tissue at the postoperative RSA radiograph.

We had no control group. Compared to earlier long-term reports in the literature on conventional PE (Sochart 1999), we found a substantially reduced wear rate. There have been few long-term RSA studies of the acetabular articulation. We measured a wear rate of 0.09 mm after 10 years, but this was for conventional PE with 32 ceramic heads (Röhrl et al. 2006). Dahl et al. (2011) found an annual wear rate of 0.096 mm with conventional PE and a 28-mm CoCr head. We found that wear of submelt-annealed HXLPE was far lower, with hardly any wear measurable over a 10-year period.

We studied only 8 patients. However, we found no cases of measurable wear even though we used a high-precision measuring method. The width of the confidence interval of wear without creep over a period of 10 years (0.04) was extremely low. The penetration of the femoral head was below the precision of our method (90 μm). Thus, the upper limits of the confidence interval of changes observed after 10 years of wear were, for all clinical purposes, negligible.

Highly crosslinked PE appears to be a good alternative to hard-on-hard bearings, considering that metal-on-metal articulations may cause excessive wear and pseudotumors, and that ALVAL (Carothers et al. 2010, Schmalzried and Tiberi 2010) and ceramic-on-ceramic articulations have been plagued by squeaking (Sexton et al. 2011).

The third generation of HXLPE eliminates free radicals further either by mechanical compression, addition of antioxidants (vitamin E), or reiterated annealing. This might be a further step in conserving the excellent mechanical properties of HXLPE over a patient’s lifetime. However, we advise caution in extrapolating our results blindly to those newer brands of HXLPE. It is not clear whether these alterations might have a negative influence on the mechanical stability of the PE.

Acknowledgments

BN initiated the study. KGN collected the data and performed the analysis. SMR, BN, and KGN wrote the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and contributed to the final paper.

No competing interests declared.

References

  1. Bragdon CR, Martell JM, Greene ME, Estok D M , Thanner J, Kärrholm J, Harris WH, Malchau H. Comparison of femoral head penetration using RSA and the Martell method. Clin Orthop. 2006;448:52–7. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000224018.88410.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Callaghan JJ, Cuckler JM, Huddleston JI, Galante JO. How have alternative bearings (such as metal-on-metal, highly cross-linked polyethylene, and ceramic-on-ceramic) affected the prevention and treatment of osteolysis? J Am Acad Orthop Surg (Suppl 1) 2008;16:S33–8. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200800001-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Capello W, D’Antonio JA, Ramakrishnan R, Naughton M. Continued improved wear with an annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop. 2011;469:825–30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1556-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carrothers AD, Gilbert RE, Jaiswal A, Richardson JB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010;92(10):1344–50. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.23504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Currier BH, Currier JH, Mayor MB, Lyford KA, Collier JP, Van Citters DW. Evaluation of oxidation and fatigue damage of retrieved crossfire polyethylene acetabular cups. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007;89(9):2023–9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahl J, Söderlund P, Nivbrant B, Nordsletten L, Röhrl SM. Int Orthop. 2011. Less wear with aluminium-oxide heads than cobalt-chrome heads with ultra high molecular weight cemented polyethylene cups: A ten-year follow-up with radiostereometry. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Digas G, Kärrholm J, Thanner J, Herberts P. 5-year experience of highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented and uncemented sockets: two randomized studies using radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(6):746–54. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gill HS, Murray DW. The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: a three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008;90(5):556–61. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grobbelaar CJ, Weber FA, Spirakis A, du Plessis TA, Cappaert G, Cakic JN. Clinical experience with gamma irradiation cross-linked polyethylene. A 20 year follow up report. S Afr J Bone Joint Surgery. 1999;9:140–7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacobs CA, Christensen CP, Greenwald AS, McKellop H. Clinical performance of highly cross-linked polyethylenes in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007;89(12):2779–86. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kurtz SM, Muratoglu OK, Evans M, Edidin AA. Advances in the processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty. Biomaterials. 1999;20(18):1659–88. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00053-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kurtz SM, Mazzucco D, Rimnac CM, Schroeder D. Anisotropy and oxidative resistance of highly crosslinked UHMWPE after deformation processing by solid-state ram extrusion. Biomaterials. 2006a;27(1):24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kurtz SM, Hozack WJ, Purtill JJ, Marcolongo M, Kraay MJ, Goldberg VM, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J, Rimnac CM, Edidin AA. Significance of in vivo degradation for polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2006b;453:47–53. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000246547.18187.0b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kurtz SM, Medel FJ, MacDonald DW, Parvizi J, Kraay MJ, Rimnac CM. Reasons for revision of first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylenes. J of Arthroplasty (Suppl 1) 2010;25(6):67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kurtz SM, Gawel HA, Patel JD. History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop. 2011;(469)((8)):2262–77. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1872-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuzyk PR, Saccone M, Sprague S, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH. Cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene for total hip replacement: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011;93(5):593–600. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McKellop H, Shen FW, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R. Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res. 1999;17(2):157–67. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100170203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Muratoglu OK, Wannomae KK, Rowell SL, Micheli BR, Malchau H. Ex vivo stability loss of irradiated and melted ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2010;92(17):2809–16. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Oonishi H, Saito M, Kadoya Y. Wear of high dose gamma irradiated polyethylene in total joint replacement - Long term radiological evaluation. Trans 44th Annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society USA; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  20. Röhrl SM, Nivbrant B, Li M, Hewitt B. In vivo wear and migration of highly cross-linked polyethylene cups A radiostereometry analysis study. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(4):409–13. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Röhrl S USAM, Nivbrant B, Snorrason F, Kärrholm J, Nilsson KG. Porous-coated cups fixed with screws: a 12-year clinical and radiostereometric follow-up study of 50 hips. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(3):393–401. doi: 10.1080/17453670610046316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Röhrl SM, Li MG, Nilsson KG, Nivbrant B. Very low wear of non-remelted highly cross-linked polyethylene cups: an RSA study lasting up to 6 years. Acta Orthop. 2007;78((6)):739–45. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ryd L, Hansson U, Blunn G, Lindstrand A, Toksvig-Larsen S. Failure of partial cementation to achieve implant stability and bone ingrowth: a long-term roentgen Stereophotogram-metric study of tibial components. J Orthop Res. 1999;17(3):311–20. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100170304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schmalzried TP, Tiberi JV. Metal-metal reactivity: Houston, we have a problem! Orthopedics. 2010;7 33(9):647. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100722-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schmalzried TP, Kwong LM, Jasty M, Sedlacek RC, Haire TC, O’Connor DO, Bragdon CR, Kabo JM, Malcolm AJ, Harris WH. The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop. 1992;274:60–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sexton SA, Yeung E, Jackson MP, Rajaratnam S, Martell JM, Walter WL, Zicat BA, Walter WK. The role of patient factors and implant position in squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011;93(4):439–42. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.25707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sochart DH. Relationship of acetabular wear to osteolysis and loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1999;363:135–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. St John K. The effect of serum protein concentration on wear rates in a hip simulator. J Biomater Appl. 2010;25(2):145–59. doi: 10.1177/0885328209347962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thomas GE, Simpson DJ, Mehmood S, Taylor A, McLardy-Smith P, Singh Gill H, Murray DW, Glyn-Jones S. The seven-year wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2011;93(8):716–22. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tower SS, Currier JH, Currier BH, Lyford KA, Van Citters DW, Mayor MB. Rim cracking of the cross-linked longevity polyethylene acetabular liner after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007;89(10):2212–7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Börlin N, Kärrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants.J. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(4):563–72. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wannomae KK, Bhattacharyya S, Freiberg AA, Estok D, Harris W, Muratoglu O. In vivo oxidation of retrieved cross-linked ultra high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular components with residual free radicals. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1005–11. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. Low-friction arthroplasty of the hip using alumina ceramic and cross-linked polyethylene. A ten-year follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999;81:54–5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b1.8822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Orthopaedica are provided here courtesy of Nordic Orthopaedic Federation

RESOURCES