Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2012 Feb 9;50(5):1173–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.01.022

Table 3. Gymnast Percent Advantages Relative to Non-gymnast Means (Current study: 2 factor ANCOVA, menarche x gymnast status; all studies adjusted for height and weight).

DXA Hip
Structural
Analysis Variable
Current Study
(pre and post-
menarche)
n= 96 GYM; 77 NON
Faulkner et al.
(pre-menarche)
n= 30 GYM; 30
NON
Maimoun et al.
(pre and post-menarche)
n= 23 GYM; 23 NON
FN Area (cm2) −2.6%* -- --
FN BMC (g) +9.6%*** 13.3%*** --
FN aBMD (g/cm2) +12.9%*** -- +18.0%***
HAL (mm) +1.7% (0.05) -- +2.2% NS
Shaft Neck Angle
(°)
−1.3%*; Interaction* +1.4% NS
NN aBMD (g/cm2) +14.5%*** +18.9%*** --
NN Width (cm) −4.1%*** −4.7%* −2.3% NS
NN CT (cm) +16.4%*** -- +26.6%***
NN ED (cm) −7.2%*** −7.9%* −6.2% NS
NN cCSA (cm2) +9.4%*** +12.6%** +19.8%***
NN Z (cm3) +9.9%*** +9.3%** +19.2%***
NN BR −19.0%*** -- −21.3%**
NN CSMI (cm4) +3.4% NS +4.1% NS +12.9% NS
*

= p<0.05

**

= p≤0.01 (Faulkner, p<0.02)

***

= p≤0.001.

Results are presented for gymnasts relative to non-gymnasts as the zero reference.

Main effect for gymnast vs. non-gymnast difference is presented, as no significant interactions were detected between gymnast status and menarche status for any variable except shaft neck angle (current study, interaction p=0.02, preNON > preGYM; preNON >postNON; preGYM ≈ postGYM ≈ postNON).

Data are not corrected for fan beam magnification error.