Abstract
Introduction
The glycosaminoglycan heparin has been shown to bind to platelet integrin αIIbβ3 and induce platelet activation and aggregation, although the relationship between binding and activation is unclear. We analyzed the interaction of heparin and αIIbβ3 in detail, to obtain a better understanding of the mechanism by which heparin acts on platelets.
Methods
We assessed conformational changes in αIIbβ3 by flow cytometry of platelets exposed to unfractionated heparin. In human platelets and K562 cells engineered to express αIIbβ3, we assayed the effect of heparin on key steps in integrin signaling: phosphorylation of the β3 chain cytoplasmic tail, and activation of src kinase. We measured the heparin binding affinity of purified αIIbβ3, and of recombinant fragments of αIIb and β3, by surface plasmon resonance.
Results and Conclusions
Heparin binding results in conformational changes in αIIbβ3, similar to those observed upon ligand binding. Heparin binding alone is not sufficient to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of the integrin β3 cytoplasmic domain, but the presence of heparin increased both β3 phosphorylation and src kinase activation in response to ligand binding. Specific recombinant fragments derived from αIIb bound heparin, while recombinant β3 did not bind. This pattern of heparin binding, compared to the crystal structure of αIIbβ3, suggests that heparin-binding sites are located in clusters of basic amino acids in the headpiece and/or leg domains of αIIb. Binding of heparin to these clusters may stabilize the transition of αIIbβ3 to an open conformation with enhanced affinity for ligand, facilitating outside-in signaling and platelet activation.
Keywords: heparin, integrin αIIbβ3 (platelet glycoprotein IIbIIIa), platelet activation, src kinase, surface plasmon resonance, tyrosine phosphorylation
The glycosaminoglycan heparin is a potent anticoagulant that is extensively used in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. However, the efficacy of heparin is limited in part by its effect on platelets. Patients receiving intravenous heparin commonly experience an immediate, transient but mild non-immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, associated with biochemical evidence of platelet activation [1–5]. Heparin-mediated platelet activation should be distinguished from the much rarer syndrome of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, caused by the formation of antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4) in a complex with heparin [1]. Both in vivo and in vitro, unfractionated heparin appears to be a stronger stimulant of platelet activation than lower molecular weight heparins [6–10]. In previous work, we have characterized the heparin oligosaccharide that binds to platelets, and shown that heparin binds to platelet integrin αIIbβ3 (platelet glycoprotein IIbIIIa) [11–15]. Thus, it seems likely that heparin binding to αIIbβ3 is directly related to its stimulatory effects. Understanding the interaction of heparin with platelets will help in the development of safer anticoagulants.
Integrin αIIbβ3 is the major platelet surface receptor for fibrinogen and other RGD-containing proteins. Like other integrins, αIIbβ3 is a bidirectional receptor that undergoes conformational changes and induces intracellular signaling upon ligand engagement (outside-in signaling), as well as upon cell activation by soluble such as thrombin or ADP (inside-out signaling). Both processes contribute to a signaling cascade that ultimately results in profound morphological and biochemical changes in the platelet [16,17]. One of the first steps in this cascade is tyrosine phosphorylation of the integrin β3 cytoplasmic tail, which alters its association with the platelet cytoskeleton, leading to shape changes, and ultimately to aggregation and release of mediators contained in platelet α granules [18].
Recent evidence indicates that heparin augments the ligand-induced phosphorylation of platelet cytoplasmic proteins involved in multiple signal transduction pathways, including through integrin αIIbβ3 [19]. In the work presented here, we show that heparin directly amplifies signaling through integrin αIIbβ3. Our experiments show that heparin augments ligand-induced conformational changes in αIIbβ3, as well as increasing tyrosine phosphorylation of both the integrin β3 cytoplasmic domain and associated src kinase. In addition, we map the binding sites of heparin on the αIIbβ3 molecule. Our results indicate that heparin-induced platelet activation is caused by the binding of heparin to αIIbβ3, with induction or stabilization of a more activated conformation. We find that heparin binds predominantly to the αIIb subunit, and suggest some potential heparin-binding sites within the receptor.
Materials and methods
Detailed procedures and additional figures are included in the Supporting Information for this paper. For all experiments, we used a standard unfractionated porcine mucosal heparin (Celsus, Inc., M.W. ~15,000 Da, 179 units/mg).
Flow cytometry of integrin activation
All blood samples were collected from normal volunteers after obtaining informed consent following protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board. Whole blood was collected into Vacutainers containing 3.2% buffered sodium citrate (Becton-Dickinson) and immediately centrifuged to obtain platelet-rich plasma (PRP). PRP was incubated with PBS, heparin (Celsus, 5µg/ml final concentration), EDTA (5mM final), or eptifibatide (Millennium Pharmaceuticals/Schering, 300µM final) and saturating concentrations of fluorescent antibodies or isotype controls. Samples were fixed and analyzed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Both forward and side scatter detectors were set on logarithmic scales, and the analysis gate was set on the major population of platelets. The percentage of positive platelets and their mean fluorescent intensity were calculated from single-parameter histograms of a minimum of ten thousand events from the gated region
Western blot analysis of protein tyrosine phosphorylation
For analysis of integrin β3 phosphorylation in human platelets, PRP was incubated with eptifibatide and/or heparin, washed, then lysed and immunoprecipitated with an anti-β3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (PM6/13, Millipore). Samples were analyzed by Western blotting (Western Breeze kit, Invitrogen) using a polyclonal rabbit antibody directed against a peptide from human integrin β3 containing phosphotyrosine (pY)759 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). After detection of phosphorylated β3, the membranes were stripped (ReBlot Plus Strong, Millipore) and total β3 was detected using a mouse mAb (clone 1, BD Transduction Laboratories). Scanned films were analyzed using ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/index.html), Microsoft Excel, and Prism5 (GraphPad) software.
KαIIbβ3 cells, derived from K562 cells transfected with plasmids expressing integrins αIIb and β3, were cultured as previously described [20]. To assay integrin β3 phosphorylation, cells were washed and spread on fibrinogen-coated Petri dishes. Nonadherent cells were removed, the adherent cells were lysed directly in sample buffer, and total protein analyzed by Western blotting. For detection of src activation, polyclonal anti-pY416 and monoclonal rabbit anti-src (Cell Signaling Technologies) were used as the primary antibodies.
Preparation, expression, and purification of αIIb and β3proteins and fragments
Intact human αIIbβ3 was purified from platelet concentrates as previously described [15]. Recombinant fragments of αIIb and the extracellular domain of β3 were generated by PCR cloning into His-fusion vectors and expressed in BL21 (DE3) bacteria (αIIb fragments) or S2 insect cells (β3extracellular domain). The αIIb fragments encompassed amino acids 1–269 (Region 1), 263–559 (Region 2), and 547–867 (Region 3) (Supplemental Figs 1 and 2). The β3 extracellular domain included amino acids 28–716. For purification of αIIb fragments, inclusion bodies were solubilized and purified on a cobalt affinity column following manufacturer’s protocols (Talon, Clontech). The β3 extracellular domain was isolated from supernatants of S2 cells by affinity chromatography on Talon resin.
Surface plasmon resonance detection of heparin binding
A gold-coated sensor chip (Nippon Laser and Electronics Lab) was coated with glucosamine N-sulfate (6-O-sulfate)-iduronic acid (2-O-sulfate) (GlcNS6S-IdoA2S) and placed in the sensing channel of a 2-channel SPR instrument (SPR-670, Moritex, Yokohama, Japan) [21,22]. A control chip coated with D-maltose was placed in the reference channel. Proteins in 0.1% TritonX-100 in PBS were injected simultaneously into both channels. Binding was detected, and binding curves and kinetic parameters calculated, using the manufacturer’s software.
Analysis of heparin binding sites and αIIbβ3 conformation
Analyses were performed on the crystal structure of αIIbβ3 reported by Zhu, et al (PDB ID: 3FCS) [23] using the program Cn3D (version 4.1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/CN3D/cn3d.shtml).
Results
Heparin induces conformational changes in platelet integrin αIIbβ3
We have previously shown that integrin αIIbβ3 is the major binding site for heparin on platelets [15]. To determine whether heparin interaction directly modulates integrin αIIbβ3 conformation, we used flow cytometry to measure the binding of a panel of antibodies to activation-dependent epitopes on human platelets. These epitopes are masked in the resting form of αIIbβ3, and are exposed by conformational activation of the receptor and high-affinity ligand binding. The antibodies LIBS-1 and -6 bind to ligand-associated epitopes on integrin β3, while PMI-1 and PAC-1 bind to αIIb [24–26]. PRP from five different normal volunteers was incubated with the respective antibodies in PBS alone, or in the presence of 5 µg/ml heparin. Figure 1A shows the change in the percentage of platelets positive for each epitope, expressed as the ratio (% with heparin/% without heparin).. Heparin increased the binding of all the activation-dependent antibodies, from an average of 1.4- (LIBS-1) to 1.8-fold (PAC-1). The increases in binding of both LIBS-6 and PAC-1 in the presence of heparin were statistically significant (p<.05, t-test). The presence of heparin alone did not induce the expression of the activation-dependent marker p-selectin (Figure 1A), suggesting that heparin binding alone was not sufficient to induce platelet activation.
Figure 1. Conformational changes in αIIbβ3 measured by flow cytometry.
A, Relative binding of Pac-1, LIBS, and p-selectin antibodies to platelets in the absence of ligand. PRP was incubated with the indicated antibodies in the presence of 5µg/ml heparin. Data are expressed as the percentage positive platelets for heparin treatment divided by PBS control (means ± SEM of 5 different subjects). The addition of heparin increased LIBS-1 and PAC-1 binding significantly more than that of p-selectin, which was no different than PBS controls (p<.05, t-test). B, Increased binding of LIBS1 but not LIBS6 in the presence of heparin and ligand. PRP was incubated with EDTA (5mM) or eptifibatide (300µM) with and without heparin (5µg/ml). Separate aliquots were incubated with the conformation-dependent antibodies LIBS-1, LIBS-6, or AP3(which recognizes all conformations of αIIbβ3). The fold increase in mean fluorescent intensity of antibody binding over EDTA controls is shown. Values are the means ± SEM of 2 studies.
The effect of heparin on ligand-induced conformational changes was assessed in a second set of experiments. PRP was incubated with the integrin antagonist eptifibatide, and the binding of LIBS-1 and 6 was measured in the presence or absence of heparin. Although eptifibitide prevents αIIbβ3 signaling and platelet aggregation [18], biophysical measurements indicate that eptifibitide binding can induce partial activation of the receptor [27]. Because a large percentage of platelets were LIBS-positive in the presence of epitifibatide, further changes are expressed as the ratio of the mean fluorescence intensity in the presence or absence of heparin. Figure 1B illustrates that the addition of heparin increases the binding of LIBS-1 in the presence of eptifibitide, while that of LIBS-6 is largely unaffected. Total surface expression of αIIbβ3, as measured by the antibody AP3, showed no changes with the different treatments.
Heparin augments signal transduction through integrin αIIbβ3
Ligand binding to integrin αIIbβ3 triggers signaling that ultimately results in platelet activation [16–18]. Because heparin appears to augment the ligand-bound conformation of αIIbβ3, we assayed the effect of heparin on tyrosine phosphorylation of the β3 cytoplasmic tail, one of the earliest signaling events of outside-in signaling. PRP was incubated with eptifibatide and varying amounts of heparin, and the phosphorylation of tyrosines in the β3 cytoplasmic tail was measured by Western blotting. To account for differences in gel loading, band intensities in the phosphotyrosine blots were normalized with the intensities of the total β3 integrin bands before assessing the effect of heparin addition. Figure 2A shows that, while neither heparin nor eptifibatide alone stimulate tyrosine phosphorylation of the β3 cytoplasmic domain, a low concentration of heparin (5µg/ml) significantly increased phosphorylation in response to eptifibatide.
Figure 2. Phosphorylation of the integrin β3 cytoplasmic tail and src in human platelets and KαIIbβ3 cells.
A, Human PRP was incubated with eptifibatide (300µMolar) and/or heparin (5 or 50µg/ml) and β3 phosphorylation measured as described in the Methods. Values are the means±SEM of 2 independent experiments, expressed as the fold change in β3 phosphorylation compared to ligand alone. The Western blot of a representative experiment is depicted. B, Washed KαIIbβ3 cells were adhered to immobilized fibrinogen in the absence or presence of heparin (means± SEM of 3 studies). Asterisks indicate p<0.05 (t-test) compared to the PBS control. C, Phosphorylation of src at tyr418 in KαIIbβ3 cells adhering to fibrinogen with or without heparin. Values are the means± SEM of five experiments. Asterisks indicate p<0.05 (t-test) compared to control.
To confirm that this effect was integrin-dependent, we repeated the experiment using K562 cells transfected with αIIbβ3 (KαIIbβ3) [20,28]. These cells have been shown to bind fibrinogen, and this model has been useful in dissecting integrin signaling. By flow cytometry, KαIIbβ3 cells do not express significant levels of other integrins (not shown). Figure 2B illustrates that phosphorylation of integrin β3 in KαIIbβ3 cells adhering to immobilized fibrinogen is significantly increased in the presence of heparin. As in platelets, this effect is observed at low concentrations of heparin, and is not increased at higher concentrations.
Another early marker of outside-in signaling by integrin αIIbβ3 is activation of the tyrosine kinase src, which is constitutively associated with the β3 cytoplasmic tail [29]. In response to ligand binding, src is dephosphorylated at tyrosine-529 and phosphorylated at tyrosine-418, activating the kinase and initiating platelet activation. Figure 2C shows that, in KαIIbβ3 cells adhering to fibrinogen, heparin significantly increases phosphorylation of endogenous src at tyrosine-418. These results indicate that heparin binding can amplify ligand-induced signaling through integrin αIIbβ3.
Identification of heparin-binding regions of αIIbβ3
The binding sites of heparin on the αIIbβ3 molecule were mapped more precisely by expressing components of the integrin heterodimer, and independently measuring their affinity for heparin structures, using surface plasmon resonance (SPR). To avoid complications arising from the structural heterogeneity of naturally occurring heparins, we immobilized a structurally defined disaccharide previously shown to bind to αIIbβ3 (GlcNS6S-Ido2S) on the SPR chip. Immobilization of the purified disaccharide also effectively increases the concentration of the active structure [22]. Binding was first measured to intact integrin αIIbβ3 purified from human platelets, and then to isolated fragments of αIIb and β3 individually. Increasing concentrations of protein in buffer were passed over the immobilized oligosaccharide to assess binding. Figure 3A illustrates the binding curve for purified platelet-derived αIIbβ3, where the KD was calculated to be 440nM. Figure 3 (B–E) are the binding curves for individual fragments of αIIb and the extracellular domain of β3, and Table 1 summarizes the dissociation constants derived from these experiments. Region 1 of αIIb (corresponding to the amino-terminal half of the head domain [30]) and Region 3 (containing part of the thigh and both calf domains) showed significant binding to the immobilized disaccharide. In contrast, the extracellular domain of β3 and αIIb Region 2 (the carboxy-terminal half of the head and adjoining thigh domain) did not appear to bind. These assays were repeated using unfractionated heparin immobilized on the SPR chip, which confirmed that only Regions 1 and 3 from αIIb bound to heparin (not shown), with affinities similar to the disaccharide. The calculated KD for Region 1 was 68.1nM for the disaccharide (Table 1) and 106.6nM for unfractionated heparin.
Figure 3. SPR binding analyses.
A, αIIbβ3. A typical binding experiment is illustrated, in which a range of concentrations of purified human αIIbβ3 were perfused over the sugar chip immobilized with a structurally defined synthetic oligosaccharide of GcNS6S-Ido2S known to bind to the platelet. B–E, recombinant fragments of αIIb and β3. For each fragment, binding to the defined heparin oligosaccharide is illustrated by the filled symbols, and binding to the control maltose chip by the open symbols. Values are the means± SD from three independent experiments.
Table 1.
Dissociation Constants for purified αIIbβ3 and Recombinant Portions of αIIbβ3
| KD (nMolar) | |
|---|---|
| native αIIbβ3 | 440 |
| Region 1 αIIb | 68.1 |
| Region 2 αIIb | no binding |
| Region 3 αIIb | 169 |
| recombinant β3 | no binding |
Discussion
We have previously shown that heparin binds to platelet integrin αIIbβ3, resulting in platelet activation and aggregation [12,15]; however, in those experiments it was unclear if heparin binding alone could activate signaling. These experiments were undertaken to address this question. The flow cytometry experiments indicate that heparin binding can induce conformational changes in αIIbβ3 similar to those resulting from ligand binding, and that heparin augments the conformational changes induced by ligand binding. The absence of increased p-selectin expression in response to heparin alone suggests that platelets are not fully activated by heparin binding. Analyses of β3 tyrosine phosphorylation and src activation further confirm that heparin alone does not produce detectable outside-in signaling, but in the presence of ligand, heparin significantly enhances signaling through αIIbβ3, both in platelets and in transfected cells expressing the integrin. Finally, through analysis of heparin-binding to isolated fragments of αIIbβ3, we mapped putative heparin-binding sites to the headpiece and genu of αIIb.
Gao et al. have also recently reported that heparin potentiates signaling through platelet αIIbβ3 [19]. Their study demonstrated that heparin augments phosphorylation of FAK and Akt in response to ligand binding. This current report extends these findings by documenting that the earliest events of the outside-in signaling cascade are potentiated by heparin. By using the K562 model system, which is devoid of other platelet receptors, we were able to show that heparin binding increases phosphorylation of the integrin β3 cytoplasmic domain and activation of the associated src kinase in response to ligand binding. Taken together, these results indicate that heparin binding results in platelet stimulation at least in part by the induction or stabilization of an activated conformation of αIIbβ3, thus facilitating ligand binding to the integrin, and amplifying outside-in signaling and platelet activation.
Mapping the binding sites of heparin on the αIIbβ3 molecule suggests a model for this mechanism. Classical linear heparin-binding motifs composed of appropriately spaced cationic residues [31–33] can be found in the extracellular domain of β3 and Region 2 of αIIb. However, the results of the binding studies demonstrated that neither β3 nor Region 2 bound heparin, while Regions 1 and 3 of αIIb bound with significant affinity to heparin and its disaccharide. Additionally, the overall densities of arginine and lysine residues in Regions 1–3 do not correlate with their heparin-binding affinity (6.3% arginine/lysine residues in Region 1, 8.8% in Region 2, 5.7% in Region 3). Thus, it seems unlikely that heparin is binding to linear or random distributions of basic amino acids in the recombinant fragments, suggesting that the major heparin binding site(s) are formed by folding of the αIIb polypeptide. One caveat is that these recombinant proteins may not be folded in precisely the same conformation as the native protein.
The crystal structure of the αIIbβ3 extracellular domain [23] reveals that several clusters of arginine and lysine residues are located on the external face of the protein. Region 1 (which binds heparin) contains a large cluster on one face of the β-propeller (Figure 4A and B). In particular, the arginines at positions 73, 77, 139, 140, and 208, along with lysine 118, are located around the cap subdomain of αIIb, adjacent to the residues essential for fibrinogen binding [34]. The basic amino acids contained in Region 3 (which also binds heparin) also appear to fall in several clusters (Figure 4C and D). Two clusters are located on either side of the genu, in the thigh and calf-1 domains, and a third on the opposite face of calf-1.
Figure 4. Clustering of basic amino acids in αIIb.
Locations of basic amino acids in αIIb, based on the crystal structure of Zhu, et al [26]. Figures were generated using Cn3D (version 4.1, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/CN3D/cn3d.shtml). A & B, two views of the αIIb headpiece. B is rotated approximately 90° from A. The αIIb protein backbone is in green. The side chains of the Arg (R) and Lys (K) residues located in Region 1 (AA 1–262) are represented by blue sticks. C, an overview of the closed form of the αIIb chain. The Arg and Lys side chains in Regions 1 and 3 are depicted as blue sticks. D, the thigh and calf-1 domains of αIIb. The Arg and Lys residues within 15Å of the genu are identified.
This correlation between experimental binding studies and the crystallographic model of αIIb offers new hypotheses about how heparin modulates integrin function. Heparin may interact with the cap subdomain, thereby modifying the conformation of the ligand-binding site. In addition, binding of a charged polysaccharide chain to the clustered basic amino acids on either side of the genu could facilitate or stabilize the opening of the thigh and calf domains, extending the leg and exposing the ligand-binding site. Finally, the third cluster of basic amino acids on calf-1 appears to lie near binding sites for calcium in the β-propeller in the inactive conformation, so binding of heparin to this cluster could potentially modify interactions of αIIb with divalent cations [34]. Others have shown that opening of the leg alone can increase the affinity of αIIbβ3 for ligand. Mutation of residues surrounding the genu that constrain the opening of the leg inhibits activation-induced increases in binding affinity [35,36]. In contrast, introduction of a glycosylation site “behind” the genu, which prevents the leg from closing, results in constitutive high-affinity ligand binding [36]. Similarly, mutations of β3 that destabilize interactions with the αIIb leg, therefore favoring a more extended resting conformation, also confer constitutive high-affinity ligand binding [37]. Thus, heparin, by binding to one or more sites on the αIIb polypeptide, may stabilize an open, partially activated, conformation of αIIbβ3.
The demonstration that heparin can modulate the behavior of integrin αIIbβ3 may have implications beyond the regulation of platelet activation [14]. As an antithrombotic drug, unfractionated heparin may have theoretical drawbacks, particularly when administered to patients with systemic platelet activation, or in combination with integrin antagonists like eptifibatide that may synergistically stabilize activated conformations of αIIbβ3. Heparin has also been shown to affect processes such as tumor metastasis and leukocyte extravasation [38], in which the interactions of various integrins with their ligands appear to play a role in regulating cell adhesion. Thus, further understanding of the role of heparin in modulation of cell adhesion may advance the use of oligosaccharides derived from heparin for therapeutic purposes in cancer and inflammatory disorders, as well as in regulating coagulation.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL39903) and the Department of Veterans Affairs to MS.
Abbreviations used
- GlcNS6S-IdoA2S
glucosamine N-sulfate (6-O-sulfate)-iduronic acid (2-O-sulfate)
- mAb
monoclonal antibody
- PBS
phosphate-buffered saline
- PRP
platelet-rich plasma
- pY
phosphotyrosine
- SPR
surface plasmon resonance
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest exists for any of the study authors.
References
- 1.Kelton JG, Warkentin TE. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a historical perspective. Blood. 2008;112:2607–2616. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-078014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Heinrich D, Gorg T, Schulz M. Effects of unfractionated and fractionated heparin on platelet function. Haemostasis. 1988;18(Suppl 3):48–54. doi: 10.1159/000215867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ellison N, Edmunds LH, Jr, Colman RW. Platelet aggregation following heparin and protamine administration. Anesthesiology. 1978;48:65–68. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197801000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Salzman EW, Rosenberg RD, Smith MH, Lindon JN. Effect of heparin and heparin fractions on platelet aggregation. J Clin Invest. 1980;65:64–73. doi: 10.1172/JCI109661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thomson C, Forbes CD, Prentice CR. The potentiation of platelet aggregation and adhesion by heparin in vitro and in vivo. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1973;45:485–494. doi: 10.1042/cs0450485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Anand SX, Kim MC, Kamran M, Sharma SK, Kini AS, Fareed J, Hoppensteadt DA, Carbon F, Cavusoglu E, Varon D, Viles-Gonzalez JF, Badimon JJ, Marmur JD. Comparison of platelet function and morphology in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention receiving bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin versus clopidogrel pretreatment and bivalirudin. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:417–424. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.02.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Furman MI, Kereiakes DJ, Krueger LA, Mueller MN, Pieper K, Broderick TM, Schneider JF, Howard WL, Fox ML, Barnard MR, Frelinger AL, Michelson AD. Leukocyte-platelet aggregation, platelet surface p-selectin and platelet surface glycoprotein IIIa after percutaneous coronary intervention: effects of dalteparin or unfractionated heparin in combination with abciximab. Am Heart J. 2001;142:790–798. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.119128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cella G, Scattolo N, Luzzatto G, Girolami A. Effects of low-molecular-weight heparin on platelets as compared with commercial heparin. Res Exp Med (Berl) 1984;184:227–229. doi: 10.1007/BF01852381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mikhailidis DP, Fonseca VA, Barradas MA, Jeremy JY, Dandona P. Platelet activation following intravenous injection of a conventional heparin: absence of effect with a low molecular weight heparinoid (Org 10172) Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987;24:415–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03193.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Westwick J, Scully MF, Poll C, Kakkar VV. Comparison of the effects of low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin on activation of human platelets in vitro. Thromb Res. 1986;42:435–447. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(86)90207-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sobel M, Adelman B. Characterization of platelet binding of heparins and other glycosaminoglycans. Thromb Res. 1988;50:815–826. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(88)90341-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Suda Y, Marques D, Kermode JC, Kusumoto S, Sobel M. Structural characterization of heparin's binding domain for human platelets. Thromb Res. 1993;69:501–508. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(93)90054-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Suda Y, Bird K, Shiyama T, Koshida S, Marques D, Fukase K, Sobel M, Kusumoto S. Synthesis and biological activity of a model disaccharide containing a key unit in heparin for binding to platelets. Tetra Let. 1996;37:1053–1056. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Da Silva MS, Horton JA, Wijelath JM, Blystone LW, Fish WR, Wijelath E, Strand K, Blystone SD, Sobel M. Heparin modulates integrin-mediated cellular adhesion: specificity of interactions with α and β integrin subunits. Cell Commun Adhes. 2003;10:59–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sobel M, Fish W, Toma N, Luo S, Bird K, Blystone SD, Suda Y. Heparin modulates integrin function in human platelets. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:587–594. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.112696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bennett JS, Berger BW, Billings PC. The structure and functions of platelet integrins. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7(Suppl 1):200–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03378.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li Z, Delaney K, O'Brien K, Du X. Signaling during platelet adhesion and activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:2341–2349. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Phillips DR, Nannizzi-Alaimo L, Prasad KS. β3 tyrosine phosphorylation in αIIbβ3 (platelet membrane GP IIb-IIIa) outside-in integrin signaling. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:246–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gao C, Boylan B, Fang J, Wilcox DA, Newman DK, Newman PJ. Heparin promotes platelet responsiveness by potentiating αIIbβ3-mediated outside-in signaling. Blood. 2011 doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307751. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Blystone SD. Kinetic regulation of β3 integrin tyrosine phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:46886–46890. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209506200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Koshida S, Suda Y, Fukui Y, Sobel M, Kusumoto S. Model compounds containing key platelet-binding disaccharide units in heparin: synthesis and binding activity to platelets. Proc Chemical Society Japan. 1999;75:688. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Koshida S, Suda Y, Sobel M, Kusumoto S. Synthesis of oligomeric assemblies of a platelet-binding key disaccharide in heparin and their biological activities. Tetra Let. 2001;42:1289–1292. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhu J, Luo B-H, Xiao T, Zhang C, Nishida N, Springer TA. Structure of a complete integrin ectodomain in a physiologic resting state and activation and deactivation by applied forces. Mol Cell. 2008;32:849–861. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shattil SJ, Hoxie JA, Cunningham M, Brass LF. Changes in the platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb.IIIa complex during platelet activation. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:11107–11114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ginsberg M, Lightsey A, Kunicki TJ, Kaufman A, Marguerie G, Plow E. Divalent cation regulation of the surface orientation of platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb: correlation with fibrinogen binding function and definition of a novel variant of Glanzmann's thrombasthenia. J Clin Invest. 1986;78:1103–1111. doi: 10.1172/JCI112667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Frelinger AL, Du X, Plow EF, Ginsberg M. Monoclonal antibodies to ligand-occupied confomers of integrin αIIbβ3 (glycoprotein IIb-IIIa) alter receptor affinity, specificity, and function. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:17106–17111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hantgan RR, Stahle MC, Connor JH, Connor RF, Mousa SA. αIIbβ3 priming and clustering by orally active and intravenous integrin antagonists. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;5:542–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Blystone SD, Lindberg FP, LaFlamme SE, Brown EJ. Integrin β3 cytoplasmic tail is necessary and sufficient for regulation of α5β1 phagocytosis by αvβ3 and integrin-associated protein. J Cell Biol. 1995;130:745–754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.3.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shattil SJ. Integrins and src:dynamic duo of adhesion signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:399–403. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Arnaout MA, Mahalingham B, Xiong JP. Integrin structure, allostery, and bidirectional signaling. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:381–410. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.090704.151217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cardin AD, Weintraub HJ. Molecular modeling of protein-glycosaminoglycan interactions. Arteriosclerosis. 1989;9:21–32. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.9.1.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rastegar-Lari G, Villoutreix BO, Ribba AS, Legendre P, Meyer D, Baruch D. Two clusters of charged residues located in the electropositive face of the von Willebrand factor A1 domain are essential for heparin binding. Biochemistry. 2002;41:6668–6678. doi: 10.1021/bi020044f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sobel M, Soler DF, Kermode JC, Harris RB. Localization and characterization of a heparin binding domain peptide of human von Willebrand factor. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:8857–8862. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kamata T, Tien KK, Irie A, Springer TA, Takada Y. Amino acid residues in the αIIb subunit that are critical for ligand binding to integrin αIIbβ3 are clustered in the β propeller model. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:44275–44283. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107021200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Blue R, Li J, Steinberger J, Murcia M, Filizola M, Coller BS. Effects of limiting extension at the αIIb genu on ligand binding to αIIbβ3. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:17604–17613. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.107763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kamata T, Handa M, Ito S, Sato Y, Ohtani T, Kawai Y, Ikeda Y, Aiso S. Structural requirements for activation in αIIbβ3 integrin. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:38428–38437. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.139667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Donald JE, Zhu H, Litvinov RI, DeGrado WF, Bennett JS. Identification of interacting hot spots in the β3 integrin stalk using comprehensive interface design. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:38658–38665. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.170670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Borsig L. Antimetastatic activities of heparins and modified heparins. Experimental evidence. Thromb Res. 2010;125(Suppl 2):S66–S71. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(10)70017-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




