SUMMARY
Candida frequently grows as a biofilm, or an adherent community of cells protected from both the host immune system and antimicrobial therapies. Biofilms represent the predominant mode of growth for many clinical infections, including those associated with placement of a medical device. Here we describe a model for Candida biofilm infection of one important clinical niche, a venous catheter. This animal model system incorporates the anatomical site, immune components, and fluid dynamics of a patient venous catheter infection and can be used for study of biofilm formation, drug resistance, and gene expression.
Keywords: Biofilm, catheter, Candida albicans, animal model, drug resistance, device infection
1. INTRODUCTION
The use of biofilm models has fueled investigation of this unique manner of growth and has been vital for characterizing associated phenotypic properties and gene expression patterns (2, 3, 14). Because Candida infection of commonly placed medical devices, such as a dentures, venous catheters, or urinary catheters, involves biofilm growth, models closely mimicking infection at these clinical sites are of interest (5). To date, the in vivo model most commonly used for Candida biofilm study is the venous catheter model described here (1, 6, 12, 15). This model emulates one of the most common clinical biofilm infections and mimics environmental host conditions at this site, including anatomical location, flow conditions, and exposure to host cells, serum proteins, and immune factors. The catheter is secured in the jugular vein without disruption of blood flow and then tunneled subcutaneously and positioned in a wire casing for protection. Inoculation of the catheter occurs 24 h after catheter placement to allow for a conditioning period of host protein deposition on the catheter surface (5, 7, 11). Throughout the experiment, the model uses the clinically relevant anticoagulant, heparin, although other anticoagulants can be utilized.
The rat venous catheter model can be used as a tool to answer a variety of scientific questions and has identified C. albicans biofilms with altered morphology, adhesion, matrix production and drug susceptibility (10, 13, 15). Confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy can successfully illustrate intact biofilm architecture, including the fungal cell morphology, presence of extracellular matrix, and the incorporation of host cells (1). Adjusting the duration of biofilm formation from 6 to 72 hours can capture the time course of this process from cell adhesion to development of a multicellular community with both yeast and hyphal fungal cell morphologies, host cell components, extracellular matrix, and open areas or channels. Sonication effectively removes cells for microbiological enumeration or cellular analyses, such as gene expression profiling or cell biology studies (9). Microbiological counts can be used to quantify the viable biofilm mass and are a simple method of measuring the impact of a luminal drug therapy or comparing the difference in viable burden among several genetic strains. In addition, organs and blood from distant sites can be collected for measurement of viable burden and assessment of biofilm dispersion or dissemination of disease. Although vascular catheters may be infected by hematogenous seeding from a distant vascular site, the model has primarily been utilized for study following intraluminal infection. The latter results in more reproducible cell number and biofilm cell mass among experiments.
2. MATERIALS
2.1 Animals
Specific-pathogen-free male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 350 g (Harlan)
2.2 Medications
Heparin sodium for injection 1000 USP unitis/mL (APP Pharmaceuticals)
Xylazine (Sigma-Aldrich,)
Buprenorphine 0.3 mg/mL (Hospital Pharmacy)
Ketamine HCl 500 mg/10mL (Bedford Laboratories)
Double Antibiotic Ointment:Bacitracin Zinc and Polymyxin B Sulfate (Fougera)
2.3 Surgical materials
Polyethylene tubing with inner diameter 1.14 mm and outer diameter 1.57 mm. (PE 160, Intramedic, Becton Dickinson)
Three way large bore stopcock with rotating male luer lock adapter (Baxter Healthcare Corporation)
Rodent jacket, rat 250-350g (Braintree Scientific, Inc)
Tether, 18′ sewn (Braintree Scientific, Inc)
Scrub Care Surgical Scrub Brush-Sponge/Nail Cleaner (catalog Cardinal Health)
Polysulfone Button Tether for rats, 0.090 in lumen, 12in (30cm) (sterile) (Instech Solomon)
Skin stapler 5.7 mm × 3.9 mm (Ethicon Endo-Surgery)
Surgical suture, sterile, non absorbable, Silk black braided 2-0 18″ (3.0 metric, 45 cm) (Ethicon Inc)
Surgical dissecting microscope (Stereo Zoom Microscope with fiber optic illuminator control (PZMIII-BS) World Precision Instruments)
Sterile syringes (variety of volumes)
Surgical attire: sterile surgical gloves, sterile gown, and surgical mask
Rodent hair clipper (A5 power pro clipper, Oster) 13. Rat dissecting kit (World Precision Instruments,)
Far Infared warming pad 14″ × 14″ (Kent Scientific Corporation)
2.4 Fungal Isolates and media
2.4.1 Media 1
YPD medium supplemented with uridine: 1% yeast extract, 2% bacto peptone, 2% glucose, and uridine 80 μg/mL
2.5 Materials for evaluation of selected endpoints
2.5.1 Microbiologic counts (optional)
Sonicating water bath (FS 14 with 40-kHz transducer, Fisher Scientific)
Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA plates: 4% dextrose, 1% peptone 1.5% agar, pH 5.6
Tissue homogenizer (Polytron 3100, Brinkman Instruments)
2.5.2 Confocal or fluorescent microscopy (optional)
-
Fluorescent probes
Calcofluor white or Fluorescent brightener 28 (Sigma-Aldrich)
FUN1 live dead yeast stain (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen)
Concavalin A Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen)
Glass-bottom petri dish (coverslip 1.5, 35-mm disk P325G 1.5-14C, MatTek)
Confocal or fluorescent microscope with inverted objective (such as Zeiss Axiovert 200)
2.4.3. Scanning electron microscopy (optional)
Glutaraldehyde (25%) (Sigma-Aldrich)
Formaldehyde (37%) (Sigma-Aldrich)
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4)
Osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Sciences)
Critical point drier (Tousimis)
Gold sputter coater (Auto Conductavac IV, Seevac Inc.)
Ultra smooth carbon adhesive tabs (12 mm, Electron Microscopy Sciences)
Aluminum mounts (12.7 mm, Electron Microscopy Sciences)
Scanning electron microscope (JSM-6100, JEOL)
2.5.4. Candida biofilm cell nucleic acid collection (optional)
AE buffer (50 mM sodium acetate pH 5.2, 10 mM EDTA)
Liquid nitrogen
Reagents for hot phenol RNA extraction (1)
3. METHODS
3.1 Preparation of catheters
Cut polyethylene tubing into 50 cm in length. This catheter length is calculated based on placement in the jugular vein 2 cm above the right atrium, subcutaneous tunneling, and extension though an external protective device to the top of the animal cage where it will be secured for access. The volume of this catheter length is approximately 500 μL. With luer stub and stop cock, the total catheter volume is approximately 700 μL.
Sterilize catheters by ethylene oxide gas sterilization as autoclaving may destroy them.
3.2 Preparation of surgical equipment
Sterilize surgical equipment, including surgical gowns, drapes, tethers, and surgical tools by autoclave.
Use prepackaged, sterilized stopcocks with luer stubs, sutures, and surgical gloves.
3.3 Catheter placement
Anesthetize animals by intraperitoneal injection of a mixture of ketamine (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (8 mg/kg). This anesthesia protocol should produce anesthesia for approximately 120 min.
Prepare the animal for the surgical procedure by removing hair from the midscapular space, anterior chest, and neck with a rodent clipper (see Note 2). Prepare skin area with an antiseptic surgical scrub brush.
Create a sterile field under the surgical microscope by placing the rat in the supine position and preparing the surgical area with sterile drapes. Wear sterile gloves, mask, and gown.
Make a vertical incision in skin of the anterior neck just right of midline and use blunt surgical dissection to expose the right jugular vein.
To subcutaneously tunnel the catheter, create a second incision at the scruff and use blunt surgical dissection toward the initial surgical incision. Next, tunnel the proximal end of the catheter through this subcutaneous space to the midscapular space and externalize the catheter at the site of the second surgical incision.
Stabilize the jugular vein and make a longitudinal incision of a few millimeters to the vein wall using the vannas scissors. Instill heparinized saline (100 units/ml) into the catheter and insert the catheter in the vein (superior vena cava) opening. Advance to a site above the right atrium (approximately 2 cm). If the catheter is appropriately placed, blood should be able to be easily withdrawn. Conversely, if the catheter is in the atrium, it may be difficult to withdraw blood. Secure the catheter to the vein with (2-0) silk ties.
Secure the catheter to the subscapular skin scruff via a button using surgical staples (Fig. 1A). Close both incisions with surgical staples and apply antibiotic ointment. Position a tether and rodent jacket on the animal to protect the catheter (Fig. 1B). Secure the distal catheter segment and stopcock above the cage to allow easy access to catheter.
Monitor the animal and wrap in a warming pad until it can lift its head and remain sternal.
Administer narcotic analgesia with buprenorphine 0.05 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily for 24h.
Allow the catheter to remain in place for 24 h prior to infection to allow for catheter surface conditioning with host proteins (see Note 3).
Fig. 1.
Surgical placement of a rat jugular venous catheter. (A) The catheter is inserted and secured in the jugular vein of an anesthetized animal. (B) The wire casing and rodent jacket protect the catheter and prevent the animal from disrupting the catheter.
3.4 Animal and catheter maintenance
Monitor the animals for signs of distress every 8 h through the study. In necessary, consider additional administration of buprenorphine 0.05 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily for analgesia.
The anterior neck incision and the catheter exit site should be examined daily for signs of inflammation or purulence. In our experience with this protocol, superficial infections are uncommon.
House animals in an environmentally controlled room with 12-h light-dark cycle and maintain on a standard ad libitum rat diet. Following surgery and for the duration of the experiments, house animals singly in shoe box cages with normal bedding.
3.5 Preparation of inoculum
Store fungal strains in 15% (vol/vol) glycerol stock at -80°C. Prior to experiments, maintain strains on YPD medium supplemented with uridine. C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis have successfully produced biofilms in this model (8).
Grow strains in YPD medium supplemented with uridine at 30°C on an orbital shaker set to 200 RPM. Harvest during late logarithmic phase (this time period can vary among strains thus should be determined experimentally). Enumerate the cells by means of hemocytometer count. Adjust the final density to 1 × 106 cells/mL in YPD supplemented with uridine.
3.6 Infection of catheter
Instill 700 μL of fungal inoculum in the catheter using a sterile syringe and the stopcock. This volume should fill the catheter lumen (See Notes 4 and 5).
Allow the inoculum to dwell for 6 h, then withdraw or flush the catheter volume. Lock the catheter with same volume of sterile heparinized saline (heparin 100 units/mL, 0.15M NaCl).
3.7 Lock treatment of catheter (optional)
Prepare antifungal drugs or other agents to be tested in sterile saline (0.15M NaCl).
After 24 h of biofilm growth, withdraw or flush the heparinized saline from the catheter.
Instill the drug (700 μL) in the catheter with a sterile syringe and lock in place (see Note 6).
3.8 Harvesting the catheter
Sacrifice animals by CO2 asphyxiation. Typical collection times are 24 h after infection or 24 h after treatment administration (see Note 6).
Aseptically remove the catheter from the animal. Collect the proximal catheter segment (approximately 8 cm).
Gently place the proximal catheter tip (that was inserted in the animal) on sterile gauze. Allow the catheter fluid to drain the length of the catheter by capillary action (see Note 7).
Collect the proximal segment of catheter that was inserted in to the animal (approximately 2 cm in length). This segment can be prepared for microbiological enumeration, microscopy, or nucleic acid collection.
3.9 Endpoint determination
3.9.1 Microbiological counts (optional)
Place the catheter section in 1 mL sterile saline.
Sonicate sample for 10 min and vigorously vortex for 30 seconds.
To ascertain the extent of disease dissemination, remove the kidneys or other internal organs from the animal. Place in a suitable volume of saline and homogenize.
Plate serial dilutions (1:10) of the catheter fluid and organ material on SDA plates and incubate for 24 h at 30°C.
Enumerate fungal colony counts as an estimate of fungal viable burden per organ.
3.9.2 Fluorescent or confocal microscopy (optional)
Cut the catheter segment perpendicular to the catheter length with an 11- blade scalpel into multiple 2- to 3-mm-long “doughnut” segments.
Stain the catheter segments with fluorescent probes (FUN1 50 μM, Concanavalin Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate 200 mM, or calcofluor white (22.5 μg/ml) at 30°C for 30 min in the dark.
Place catheter segments on the coverslip of a glass-bottom petri dish with the cut edge against the coverslip. Image the luminal surface of the catheter by fluorescent or confocal microscopy using the light source and filters appropriate for selected dyes (1).
3.9.3 Scanning electron microscopy (optional)
Cut the catheter segment perpendicular to the catheter length with an 11- blade scalpel into multiple 2- to 3-mm-long “doughnut” segments.
Place segments in fixative (1% glutaraldehyde, 4% formaldehyde in PBS) for 16 hours at 4°C.
Gently remove fixative and add 1 mL PBS for 10 min to wash samples.
Place samples in osmium tetroxide (1% in PBS) for 30 min. Osmium tetroxide is toxic and should only be used in a hood with protective gloves, lab coat, and eye wear. Proper disposal is required.
Gently remove osmium tetroxide and add 1 mL PBS for 10 min to wash samples.
Dehydrate samples by treating samples to a series of ethanol washes (30% for 10 min, 50% for 10 min, 70% for 10 min, 95% for 10 min, and 100% for 10 min).
Use critical point drying according to instruction to accomplish final desiccation. Our protocol uses three 10 minute CO2 soaks prior to achieving critical point.
Section catheter segments length wise and mount the specimens on aluminum stubs with the luminal side visible.
Coat samples with gold appropriate for scanning electron microscope using a sputter coater. Our protocol coats samples for 2.5 to 3 minutes.
Image the luminal surface of catheter samples using scanning electron microscopy (Fig. 2) (1).
Fig. 2.
Scanning electron micrographs of a Candida albicans biofilm on a rat venous catheter. Catheter segments were harvested, processed, and imaged as described in section 3.9.3. The image at 50x magnification (A) shows the biofilm attached to the luminal catheter surface. At 1000x magnification (B), the hyphae, yeast and extracellular matrix of the biofilm can be visualized.
3.9.4 Nucleic acid collection (optional)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (RO1 AI073289-01).
Footnotes
Prior to performing the catheter placement procedure, individuals should be trained in small animal surgery techniques.
The procedure that is described can be completed by an individual, however, it can be helpful to include an assistant to make tools and the device readily available when needed during the procedure.
We do not immunosuppress the animals prior to catheter insertion and biofilm infection. For investigation of host response, immunosuppression could be considered.
We found that shaving the animal prior to surgery helps prevent contamination of the catheter with fur or skin bacteria, reducing chances of superficial infection.
The 24 h period prior to inoculation allows a conditioning period for deposition of host protein on the catheter surface, enhancing adherence and biofilm formation.
The inoculum of cells is critical for biofilm formation. Using lower concentrations of cells typically does not lead to a mature biofilm, perhaps related to quorum sensing (4). If a smaller biofilm is desired, examining an early timepoint is recommended rather than decreasing the inoculum.
The model uses direct inoculation of the catheter lumen to initiate infection and biofilm formation. This method produces reliable formation of biofilm on the luminal catheter surface. To represent a hematogenous source of infection, an alternative method of inoculation, such as tail vein inoculation, may be used. However, this method is less well-studied and may not necessarily produce a biofilm on the luminal surface.
We have not established a maximal duration of catheter insertion, but have had catheters successfully placed for up to 72 h. The animals appeared healthy and we see no reason why this duration may not be substantially lengthened.
Draining the blood from the catheter prior to imaging allows easier viewing of the Candida biofilm. In the absence of this step, blood in the catheter may clot and obscure the biofilm. Draining also removes non-adherent cells prior to microbiological enumeration.
Catheter sections can be flash-frozen in RNAlater; however RNA yields and subsequent gene expression patterns were similar to those frozen in AE buffer.
The total Candida RNA yield obtained varies among catheters, but is approximately 1 μg per catheter tip.
REFERENCES
- 1.Andes D, Nett J, Oschel P, Albrecht R, Marchillo K, Pitula A. Development and characterization of an in vivo central venous catheter Candida albicans biofilm model. Infection and immunity. 2004;72:6023–6031. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.10.6023-6031.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chandra J, Kuhn DM, Mukherjee PK, Hoyer LL, McCormick T, Ghannoum MA. Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance. Journal of bacteriology. 2001;183:5385–5394. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.18.5385-5394.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hawser SP, Baillie GS, Douglas LJ. Production of extracellular matrix by Candida albicans biofilms. Journal of medical microbiology. 1998;47:253–256. doi: 10.1099/00222615-47-3-253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hogan DA. Talking to themselves: autoregulation and quorum sensing in fungi. Eukaryotic cell. 2006;5:613–619. doi: 10.1128/EC.5.4.613-619.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kojic EM, Darouiche RO. Candida infections of medical devices. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2004;17:255–267. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.2.255-267.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mukherjee PK, Mohamed S, Chandra J, Kuhn D, Liu S, Antar OS, Munyon R, Mitchell AP, Andes D, Chance MR, Rouabhia M, Ghannoum MA. Alcohol dehydrogenase restricts the ability of the pathogen Candida albicans to form a biofilm on catheter surfaces through an ethanol-based mechanism. Infection and immunity. 2006;74:3804–3816. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00161-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nett J, Andes D. Candida albicans biofilm development, modeling a host-pathogen interaction. Current opinion in microbiology. 2006;9:340–345. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nett J, Lincoln L, Marchillo K, Andes D. Beta -1,3 glucan as a test for central venous catheter biofilm infection. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2007;195:1705–1712. doi: 10.1086/517522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nett JE, Lepak AJ, Marchillo K, Andes DR. Time course global gene expression analysis of an in vivo Candida biofilm. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2009;200:307–313. doi: 10.1086/599838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nett JE, Sanchez H, Cain MT, Andes DR. Genetic basis of Candida biofilm resistance due to drug-sequestering matrix glucan. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2010;202:171–175. doi: 10.1086/651200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nikawa H, Nishimura H, Hamada T, Kumagai H, Samaranayake LP. Effects of dietary sugars and, saliva and serum on Candida bioflim formation on acrylic surfaces. Mycopathologia. 1997;139:87–91. doi: 10.1023/a:1006851418963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nobile CJ, Nett JE, Hernday AD, Homann OR, Deneault JS, Nantel A, Andes DR, Johnson AD, Mitchell AP. Biofilm matrix regulation by Candida albicans Zap1. PLoS biology. 2009;7:e1000133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nobile CJ, Schneider HA, Nett JE, Sheppard DC, Filler SG, Andes DR, Mitchell AP. Complementary adhesin function in C. albicans biofilm formation. Curr Biol. 2008;18:1017–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ramage G, Vandewalle K, Wickes BL, Lopez-Ribot JL. Characteristics of biofilm formation by Candida albicans. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2001;18:163–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Uppuluri P, Nett J, Heitman J, Andes D. Synergistic effect of calcineurin inhibitors and fluconazole against Candida albicans biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1127–1132. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01397-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]