Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Mar 3;68(Pt 4):o957. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812008896

2-(4-Nitro­benzyl­idene)malononitrile

Ming-Jen Chang a, Tzu-Chien Fang a, Hsing-Yang Tsai a, Ming-Hui Luo a, Kew-Yu Chen a,*
PMCID: PMC3343936  PMID: 22590017

Abstract

In the title compound, C10H5N3O2, the benzyl­idene­malono­nitrile unit is nearly planar, with a maximum deviation of 0.129 (2) Å for a terminal N atom; the nitro group is approximately coplanar with the benzene ring [dihedral angle = 8.8 (3)°]. An intra­molecular C—H⋯N hydrogen bond stabilizes the mol­ecular conformation.

Related literature  

For the preparation of the title compound, see: Baheti et al. (2011). For the spectroscopy and applications of benzyl­idenemalononitrile derivatives, see: Cao et al. (2010); Ding & Zhao (2010); Elinson et al. (2010); Herbivo et al. (2010); Shigemitsu et al. (2011); Ye et al. (2010). For related structures, see: El Brahmi et al. (2011); Karthikeyan et al. (2011); Mehdi et al. (2010); Ouzidan et al. (2011); Raza et al. (2010).graphic file with name e-68-0o957-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C10H5N3O2

  • M r = 199.17

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 19.5557 (9) Å

  • b = 3.8732 (2) Å

  • c = 11.9823 (5) Å

  • V = 907.58 (7) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.89 mm−1

  • T = 297 K

  • 0.76 × 0.60 × 0.18 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001) T min = 0.674, T max = 1.000

  • 3111 measured reflections

  • 1517 independent reflections

  • 1420 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.016

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034

  • wR(F 2) = 0.091

  • S = 1.06

  • 1517 reflections

  • 136 parameters

  • 1 restraint

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.13 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3

  • Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 582 Friedel pairs

  • Flack parameter: −0.2 (2)

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812008896/xu5449sup1.cif

e-68-0o957-sup1.cif (14.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812008896/xu5449Isup2.hkl

e-68-0o957-Isup2.hkl (74.8KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812008896/xu5449Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C1—H1A⋯N3 0.93 2.58 3.431 (3) 152

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Council (grant No. NSC 99–2113-M-035–001-MY2) and Feng Chia University in Taiwan.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Organic compounds bearing benzylidenemalononitrile moieties have attracted considerable attention due to their potential applications in the design of molecular devices (Cao et al., 2010; Herbivo et al., 2010; Shigemitsu et al., 2011). In addition, the title compound and its derivatives have been used as potential precursors to prepare 5,7-diazaspiro[2,5]octane (Elinson et al., 2010), 2-amino-4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile (Ding et al., 2010) and 4H-pyran derivatives (Ye et al., 2010).

The molecular structure of the title compound is shown in Figure 1. The nitro group is close to being coplanar with the benzene ring (dihedral angle = 8.8 (3)°), which is consistent with previous studies (El Brahmi et al., 2011; Mehdi et al., 2010; Ouzidan et al., 2011; Raza et al., 2010). In addition, the benzylidenemalononitrile moiety is nearly planar with a maximum deviation of 0.129 (2))Å for atom N2 (Karthikeyan et al., 2011). An intramolecular C—H···N hydrogen bond stabilizes the molecular conformation.

Experimental

The title compound was synthesized by the Knoevenagel condensation of malononitrile with 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (Baheti et al., 2011). Colorless crystals suitable for the crystallographic studies reported here were isolated over a period of four weeks by slow evaporation from a chloroform solution.

Refinement

H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.93 Å) and allowed to ride on their parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound, showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.

Crystal data

C10H5N3O2 F(000) = 408
Mr = 199.17 Dx = 1.458 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pna21 Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
Hall symbol: P 2c -2n Cell parameters from 2320 reflections
a = 19.5557 (9) Å θ = 3.7–71.5°
b = 3.8732 (2) Å µ = 0.89 mm1
c = 11.9823 (5) Å T = 297 K
V = 907.58 (7) Å3 Parallelepiped, colorless
Z = 4 0.76 × 0.60 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer 1517 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1420 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.016
ω scans θmax = 71.7°, θmin = 4.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001) h = −24→15
Tmin = 0.674, Tmax = 1.000 k = −4→3
3111 measured reflections l = −14→14

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.091 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0621P)2 + 0.0168P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1517 reflections Δρmax = 0.13 e Å3
136 parameters Δρmin = −0.16 e Å3
1 restraint Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 582 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Flack parameter: −0.2 (2)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 0.19540 (9) 1.1888 (6) −0.10487 (14) 0.0798 (6)
O2 0.17348 (9) 1.4626 (5) 0.04698 (17) 0.0790 (6)
N1 0.21000 (8) 1.2840 (4) −0.01057 (15) 0.0530 (4)
N2 0.61988 (11) 0.5187 (6) 0.25478 (17) 0.0672 (5)
N3 0.53572 (10) 0.5513 (7) −0.07973 (17) 0.0743 (6)
C1 0.38494 (10) 0.9176 (5) 0.00650 (14) 0.0445 (4)
H1A 0.4165 0.8120 −0.0404 0.053*
C2 0.32231 (10) 1.0153 (5) −0.03437 (15) 0.0449 (4)
H2A 0.3110 0.9738 −0.1086 0.054*
C3 0.27635 (9) 1.1752 (5) 0.03563 (14) 0.0405 (4)
C4 0.29078 (10) 1.2411 (5) 0.14638 (16) 0.0471 (5)
H4A 0.2591 1.3505 0.1922 0.056*
C5 0.35351 (10) 1.1396 (5) 0.18681 (15) 0.0447 (4)
H5A 0.3641 1.1811 0.2613 0.054*
C6 0.40158 (9) 0.9766 (4) 0.11918 (14) 0.0387 (4)
C7 0.46578 (10) 0.8685 (5) 0.17120 (14) 0.0415 (4)
H7A 0.4690 0.9154 0.2471 0.050*
C8 0.52069 (10) 0.7129 (4) 0.12720 (15) 0.0408 (4)
C9 0.57642 (11) 0.6105 (5) 0.19838 (16) 0.0478 (5)
C10 0.52915 (9) 0.6242 (6) 0.01095 (17) 0.0489 (5)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.0629 (11) 0.1147 (15) 0.0617 (10) 0.0171 (10) −0.0179 (8) −0.0051 (10)
O2 0.0585 (9) 0.0933 (14) 0.0852 (13) 0.0283 (9) 0.0017 (9) −0.0088 (10)
N1 0.0435 (9) 0.0578 (10) 0.0577 (12) 0.0029 (7) 0.0036 (8) 0.0085 (9)
N2 0.0659 (12) 0.0835 (14) 0.0521 (10) 0.0141 (11) −0.0141 (10) 0.0016 (9)
N3 0.0567 (11) 0.1197 (18) 0.0464 (10) 0.0190 (11) −0.0019 (9) −0.0203 (11)
C1 0.0467 (9) 0.0544 (11) 0.0324 (8) 0.0064 (8) 0.0011 (7) −0.0025 (8)
C2 0.0470 (9) 0.0543 (11) 0.0334 (8) 0.0003 (8) −0.0011 (8) −0.0006 (8)
C3 0.0391 (8) 0.0424 (9) 0.0399 (10) −0.0019 (7) 0.0009 (7) 0.0045 (7)
C4 0.0480 (10) 0.0506 (11) 0.0426 (10) 0.0023 (9) 0.0106 (8) −0.0029 (9)
C5 0.0501 (10) 0.0529 (11) 0.0312 (8) −0.0032 (8) 0.0027 (8) −0.0009 (8)
C6 0.0447 (9) 0.0394 (9) 0.0321 (8) −0.0029 (7) 0.0016 (7) 0.0030 (7)
C7 0.0515 (10) 0.0439 (11) 0.0290 (7) −0.0038 (8) −0.0023 (7) 0.0013 (7)
C8 0.0447 (9) 0.0407 (9) 0.0370 (9) −0.0041 (8) −0.0039 (7) 0.0024 (8)
C9 0.0502 (10) 0.0520 (11) 0.0413 (10) 0.0009 (9) −0.0029 (9) 0.0011 (9)
C10 0.0401 (9) 0.0618 (12) 0.0449 (10) 0.0041 (8) −0.0009 (8) −0.0037 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O1—N1 1.222 (2) C3—C4 1.381 (3)
O2—N1 1.210 (2) C4—C5 1.376 (3)
N1—C3 1.472 (2) C4—H4A 0.9300
N2—C9 1.143 (3) C5—C6 1.393 (3)
N3—C10 1.130 (3) C5—H5A 0.9300
C1—C2 1.372 (3) C6—C7 1.463 (3)
C1—C6 1.407 (2) C7—C8 1.339 (3)
C1—H1A 0.9300 C7—H7A 0.9300
C2—C3 1.377 (3) C8—C10 1.444 (3)
C2—H2A 0.9300 C8—C9 1.440 (3)
O2—N1—O1 124.15 (19) C4—C5—C6 121.76 (17)
O2—N1—C3 118.00 (17) C4—C5—H5A 119.1
O1—N1—C3 117.85 (17) C6—C5—H5A 119.1
C2—C1—C6 120.27 (17) C5—C6—C1 118.41 (17)
C2—C1—H1A 119.9 C5—C6—C7 117.46 (17)
C6—C1—H1A 119.9 C1—C6—C7 124.11 (16)
C3—C2—C1 119.29 (17) C8—C7—C6 130.47 (17)
C3—C2—H2A 120.4 C8—C7—H7A 114.8
C1—C2—H2A 120.4 C6—C7—H7A 114.8
C2—C3—C4 122.37 (17) C7—C8—C10 125.34 (17)
C2—C3—N1 118.37 (15) C7—C8—C9 119.85 (17)
C4—C3—N1 119.25 (16) C10—C8—C9 114.78 (16)
C5—C4—C3 117.89 (18) N2—C9—C8 177.8 (2)
C5—C4—H4A 121.1 N3—C10—C8 179.3 (3)
C3—C4—H4A 121.1
C6—C1—C2—C3 0.8 (3) C3—C4—C5—C6 0.2 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −0.2 (3) C4—C5—C6—C1 0.4 (3)
C1—C2—C3—N1 178.79 (16) C4—C5—C6—C7 −177.94 (17)
O2—N1—C3—C2 −170.72 (19) C2—C1—C6—C5 −0.9 (3)
O1—N1—C3—C2 9.0 (3) C2—C1—C6—C7 177.29 (17)
O2—N1—C3—C4 8.3 (3) C5—C6—C7—C8 −179.0 (2)
O1—N1—C3—C4 −172.0 (2) C1—C6—C7—C8 2.8 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −0.3 (3) C6—C7—C8—C10 2.3 (3)
N1—C3—C4—C5 −179.30 (17) C6—C7—C8—C9 −175.70 (17)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C1—H1A···N3 0.93 2.58 3.431 (3) 152

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: XU5449).

References

  1. Baheti, A., Singh, P. & Thomas, K. R. J. (2011). Dyes Pigm. 88, 195–203.
  2. Bruker (2001). SMART, SAINT and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Cao, X., Wen, Y., Guo, Y., Yu, G., Liu, Y. & Yang, L.-M. (2010). Dyes Pigm. 84, 203–207.
  4. Ding, D. & Zhao, C.-G. (2010). Tetrahedron Lett. 51, 1322–1325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. El Brahmi, N., Benchidmi, M., Essassi, E. M., Ladeira, S. & Ng, S. W. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o3260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Elinson, M. N., Vereshchagin, A. N., Stepanov, N. O., Zaimovskaya, T. A., Merkulova, V. M. & Nikishin, G. I. (2010). Tetrahedron Lett. 51, 428–431.
  7. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  8. Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.
  9. Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.
  10. Herbivo, C., Comel, A., Kirsch, G., Fonseca, A. M. C., Belsley, M. & Raposo, M. M. M. (2010). Dyes Pigm. 86, 217–226.
  11. Karthikeyan, S., Sethusankar, K., Devaraj, A. & Bakthadoss, M. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o3469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Mehdi, S. H., Sulaiman, O., Ghalib, R. M., Yeap, C. S. & Fun, H.-K. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Ouzidan, Y., Kandri Rodi, Y., Saffon, N., Essassi, E. M. & Ng, S. W. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Raza, A. R., Nisar, B. & Tahir, M. N. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Shigemitsu, Y., Wang, B.-C., Nishimura, Y. & Tominaga, Y. (2011). Dyes Pigm. 92, 580–587.
  17. Ye, Z., Xu, R., Shao, X., Xu, X. & Li, Z. (2010). Tetrahedron Lett. 51, 4991–4994.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812008896/xu5449sup1.cif

e-68-0o957-sup1.cif (14.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812008896/xu5449Isup2.hkl

e-68-0o957-Isup2.hkl (74.8KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812008896/xu5449Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES