Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2012 Apr 10;13(4):4508–4522. doi: 10.3390/ijms13044508

Enhancement of Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Polycaprolactone/Chitosan Blend by Calcium Carbonate Nanoparticles

Sanaz Abdolmohammadi 1,*, Samira Siyamak 1, Nor Azowa Ibrahim 1,*, Wan Md Zin Wan Yunus 2, Mohamad Zaki Ab Rahman 1, Susan Azizi 1, Asma Fatehi 1
PMCID: PMC3344229  PMID: 22605993

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) nanoparticles on the mechanical and thermal properties and surface morphology of polycaprolactone (PCL)/chitosan nanocomposites. The nanocomposites of PCL/chitosan/CaCO3 were prepared using a melt blending technique. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results indicate the average size of nanoparticles to be approximately 62 nm. Tensile measurement results show an increase in the tensile modulus with CaCO3 nanoparticle loading. Tensile strength and elongation at break show gradual improvement with the addition of up to 1 wt% of nano-sized CaCO3. Decreasing performance of these properties is observed for loading of more than 1 wt% of nano-sized CaCO3. The thermal stability was best enhanced at 1 wt% of CaCO3 nanoparticle loading. The fractured surface morphology of the PCL/chitosan blend becomes more stretched and homogeneous in PCL/chitosan/CaCO3 nanocomposite. TEM micrograph displays good dispersion of CaCO3 at lower nanoparticle loading within the matrix.

Keywords: nanocomposites, calcium carbonate nanoparticles, polycaprolactone, chitosan, mechanical properties, thermal properties

1. Introduction

Nanocomposites are an attractive class of materials providing novel performance. Due to some of their remarkable properties at low filler loading (less than 10 wt%), they are being increasingly adopted by industry whilst displacing the use of conventional filler materials. A variety of nanoscale fillers, including layered silicates and nanoparticles, are capable of enhancing mechanical and thermal properties of nanocomposites, including modulus, strength, impact performance, and heat resistance [13].

Among nanoparticles, CaCO3 is one of the most common and inexpensive inorganic fillers that has been used in the nanocomposite preparation process. Fine grade nano-sized precipitated CaCO3 (NPCC) has the potential to be an important functional filler in polymer systems such as polypropylene composites, poly (vinyl chloride) composites and poly (ethylene terephthalate) composites that are being produced [47]. It is a common practice to coat the surface of the NPCC with fatty acids such as stearic acid to reduce moisture absorption and particle agglomeration as well as to enhance dispersibility of the polar filler when incorporated into non-polar polymer melts [8].

Extensive studies on the reinforcing effect of nano- and micro-sized CaCO3 particles have been carried out in different polymer matrices, such as high density polyethylene (HDPE), nylon, polypropylene (PP), polylactide, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Using nano-CaCO3 particles significantly improved the mechanical properties as well as the surface smoothness of nanocomposites [912].

Poly (ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL) is a biodegradable aliphatic polyester regularly prepared through ring opening of ɛ-caprolactone in the presence of metal alkoxides (aluminum isopropoxide, tin octoate, etc.) [13]. Some particular features of PCL include flexibility, low Tg (−61 °C), and low melting point (65 °C), comparatively high price, and a fairly long biodegradability cycle [14,15].

Based on its biodegradable characteristics, PCL is broadly applied in environmental (e.g., soft compostable packaging) and biomedical (e.g., blood bags and catheters) applications [16].

To overcome some of the PCL properties’ drawbacks, such as high price and long biodegradability cycles, in some cases PCL is blended with a cheaper biodegradable natural polymer, such as starch, cellulous, or chitin and chitosan [1521].

Chitosan is a polysaccharide, composed mainly of b-(1,4)-linked 2-deoxy-2-amino-D-glucopyranose units, which is the deacetylated product of chitin (poly (N-acetyl-D-glucopyranose)), being the second most plentiful natural based biopolymer after cellulose [2225]. A waste product, chitosan is an antibacterial, non-toxic, biocompatible, and edible biodegradable polymer with good mechanical properties, biocompatibility and biodegradability, and has been widely used for several decades in different fields of studies, such as water engineering as part of a filtration process (removing phosphorus, heavy minerals, and oils from the water), food packaging film (edible coatings or films used for extending the shelf life of foodstuffs of, for example, fruit, meat, and fish and seafood), artificial skin and bone substitutes [26,27].

Chitosan, due to its antibacterial and biodegradable properties, mixed with PCL, a flexible material, can be broadly used for antibacterial packaging purposes.

However, PCL and chitosan are immiscible, because PCL is a hydrophobic polyester, whereas chitosan is a hydrophilic polysaccharide. Consequently, their blends suffer from some weaknesses in thermal and mechanical properties, making them uncompetitive for many applications [28].

Many studies have focused on improving the compatibility between these two phases, either by adding a third component or by stimulating a chemical reaction leading to a modification of the polymer interface. Wu has investigated the effect of grafting acrylic acid onto PCL on the properties of PCL/chitosan blend [16]. Liu et al. used chemical reaction to prepare the biosynthetic graft copolymers of chitosan with PCL, a product applicable in a variety of purposes [29].

So far, no study has been undertaken to investigate the use of CaCO3 nanoparticles in polycaprolactone/chitosan composites. The principal goal of this research is to improve the mechanical and thermal properties of PCL/chitosan composites by adding CaCO3 nanoparticles as a nano-filler.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Results of Nanoparticle Characterization

2.1.1. Electron Microscopic Analysis

A TEM micrograph of CaCO3 nanoparticles is shown in Figure 1. As illustrated in Figure 1, nanoparticles have cubic shape with an average size of 62 nm calculated from the size of 10 randomly chosen particles.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

TEM micrographs of CaCO3 nanoparticles.

2.1.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Characterization (FTIR)

From the FTIR spectrum of CaCO3 nanoparticles illustrated in Figure 2, it can be seen that the nano CaCO3 had adsorption bands at 2950–2840 cm−1, corresponding to the vibration mode of C–H of stearic acid, and also 707, 873 and 1418 cm−1 corresponding to the in-, out-plane bending and asymmetrical stretching vibration peaks of O-C-O, respectively. They all are characteristic peaks in calcite [30,31].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

FTIR spectrum of the nano CaCO3.

2.1.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The weight loss and derivative weight of nanoparticles as a function of temperature are shown in Figure 3; two stages of degradation of nano-sized CaCO3 are displayed. The first stage accruing at 260 °C belongs to degradation of stearic acid, and the second stage at 720 °C corresponds to the decomposition of CaCO3 itself [31]. This result specifies that processing temperature for melt blending PCL/chitosan/nano CaCO3 should be lower than 260 °C.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

TGA and DTG (Thermal degradation properties) curve of CaCO3 nanoparticles.

2.2. Results of Nanocomposites Characterization

2.2.1. Mechanical Properties of Nanocomposites

As illustrated in Table 1, by increasing the amount of CaCO3 nanoparticles, tensile modulus increases. The increase in tensile modulus must be caused by rigidity of the filler and strong interaction between the polymer and filler due to the large interfacial area between particles [32,33]. The enhanced composite modulus as a result of nanofiller loading has also been reported by several research groups [34,35].

Table 1.

Tensile properties of PCL/chitosan composite with different amounts of nano CaCO3.

Composite Tensile Strength (MPa) Elongation at Break (%) Modulus (MPa)
PCL/chitosan 15.05 ± 0.84 848.00 ± 6.87 160.26 ± 4.15
PCL/chitosan/0.5 wt% nano CaCO3 17.31 ± 0.92 915.00 ± 7.84 190.58 ± 3.20
PCL/chitosan/1 wt% nano CaCO3 20.18 ± 0.96 1215.00 ± 8.35 214.91 ± 3.53
PCL/chitosan/3 wt% nano CaCO3 14.65 ± 0.73 751.00 ± 6.54 231.80 ± 3.89
PCL/chitosan/5 wt% nano CaCO3 12.16 ± 0.67 460.00 ± 5.31 247.21 ± 5.36
PCL/chitosan/7 wt% nano CaCO3 9.18 ± 0.54 124.00 ± 4.57 278.60 ± 4.53

Increasing CaCO3 nanoparticle content enhances the tensile strength and peaks at 1 wt% of nano-sized CaCO3 loading, due to good dispersion of nanoparticles into the matrix, yielding a higher reinforcement effect. Acting similarly to a compatibilizing agent, nanoparticles enhance the dispersion of materials and the interfacial adhesion within the matrix. By further loading of nano-sized CaCO3, the tensile strength gradually decreases as a result of the agglomeration of filler particles at higher amounts [36]. Particle agglomeration flaws the material’s surface, which restrains stress movement, and eventually results in decreased tensile strength [35].

By loading different amounts of nano-sized CaCO3, the elongation at break decreases except for 0.5 and 1 wt% of nano CaCO3. The higher elongation at break at lower nano-sized CaCO3 loading is due to the good dispersion of nanoparticles within the matrix [37]. However, at higher filler loading, a large amount of agglomeration was more apparent, due to the high surface energy of nanoparticles, thus contributing to the lower elongation at break [38,39].

The tensile results imply a good dispersion of the CaCO3 nanoparticles at 1 wt% in the matrix; the finding is also approved by SEM image.

2.2.2. Thermal Properties of Nanocomposites

TGA and DTG thermograms of PCL, PCL/chitosan blend and its nanocomposites are displayed in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. Figure 4 illustrates samples weight losses as the temperature increases. CaCO3 nanoparticles raise the temperature at which the degradation process initiates. As shown in Figure 4b, the onset decomposition temperature of 223 °C for PCL and 231.45 °C for PCL/chitosan composite increases to 258.76 °C by loading 1 wt% nano-sized CaCO3. Figure 5b exhibits two stages of degradation of the PCL/chitosan blend. The first stage at Tmax 1 = 283 °C corresponds to chitosan backbone degradation resulting from saccharide ring dehydration, and the second stage at Tmax 2 = 382 °C corresponds to PCL decomposition [28].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

TGA curves of: (a) PCL, and PCL/chitosan with different amount of CaCO3 nanoparticles; (b) pristine composite (PCL/chitosan) and nanocomposite with highest thermal stability.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

DTG curves of: (a) PCL, and PCL/chitosan with different amounts of CaCO3 nanoparticles; (b) pristine composite (PCL/chitosan) and nanocomposite with highest thermal stability.

Figure 5b shows that the second stage occurring at Tmax 2 increases considerably from 382.89 °C for the PCL/chitosan composite to 446.87 °C after the addition of 1 wt% CaCO3 nanoparticles. The nanocomposites possess higher thermal stability compared to the PCL/chitosan composite, due to better adhesion between reinforced CaCO3 nanoparticles and matrix and the hindered diffusion of volatile decomposition products resulting from homogeneous dispersion of nanoparticles within the nanocomposites [31,32].

2.2.3. Morphology Observation

Fractured surface morphology of the PCL/chitosan blend, as well as its nanocomposite, was studied by SEM.

Figure 6 shows that the PCL/chitosan composite possesses a stretched and porous surface. The low interaction between the two components and the lack of interfacial adhesion are the underlying reasons. The unmixed chitosan particles sizing (11.23, 12.01 μm) are illustrated in the Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

SEM micrograph of PCL/chitosan composite.

A large number of small discrete nanoparticles on the fractured surface of the PCL/chitosan/CaCO3 nanocomposite are exhibited in the Figure 7. The sizes of the randomly selected CaCO3 nanoparticle in PCL/chitosan/CaCO3, as displayed in Figure 7, are 49.81 and 63.10 nm. This observation compared to the average of 10 solely CaCO3 nanoparticle measured size of 62 nm and shown in Figure 1, confirming that the particles highlighted in Figure 7 are CaCO3 nanoparticles. As shown in the Figure 7 by adding 1 wt% nano-sized CaCO3 the surface becomes smoother, the dispersion of the nanoparticle is improved and the interfacial interaction between nanoparticles and matrix becomes stronger [39].

Figure 7.

Figure 7

SEM micrograph of PCL/chitosan/1 wt% CaCO3 nanoparticles.

As Figure 8 shows, at a higher rate of filler loading (about 5 wt%), a higher rate of agglomeration occurs, lowering the tensile strength. These results are in line with measured mechanical results.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

SEM micrograph of PCL/chitosan/5 wt% CaCO3 nanoparticles.

TEM was applied to investigate the dispersion of nanoparticles within the matrix. Figure 9 shows good dispersion of 1 wt% of nano CaCO3; however, Figure 10 displays the higher rate of agglomeration which is predominantly formed at nanometer scale by increasing the nanoparticle’s content to 5 wt%. This is due to the fact that the distance between nanoparticles shrinks at higher filler loadings, making it more likely for nanoparticles to reunite and, as a consequence, reduce the dispersion of the CaCO3 particles, resulting in more aggregation.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

TEM micrograph of PCL/chitosan/1 wt% CaCO3 nanoparticles.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

TEM micrograph of PCL/chitosan/5 wt% CaCO3 nanoparticles.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials

Commercial grade poly (ɛ-caprolactone) (CAPA6500) was supplied from Solvay, Warrington, UK. Chitosan with a degree of deacetylation of 85% and average molecular weight of 345,500 g·mol−1 was obtained by the Malaysian Nuclear Agency and dried at 50 °C for 3 days. Calcium carbonate nanoparticles with surface coating of stearic acid were purchased from Malaysian Nuclear Agency.

3.2. Preparation of Nanocomposites

PCL/chitosan nanocomposites were carried out by a melt blending method using a Brabender Plastograph D28033 Berman with a rotor speed of 50 rpm, reaction time of 20 min and mixing temperature of 100 °C. PCL pellets were first added to the mixing chamber, which had been heated and stabilized at 100 °C. Then, after 2 min of heating, chitosan was added in four equal portions at 2-min intervals to the molten PCL. This was followed by the additions of 0.5, 1, 3, 5, or 7 wt% of CaCO3 nanoparticles into the PCL/chitosan (90/10 wt%). The CaCO3 nanoparticles were added slowly over a period of 10 min into the chamber to give well dispersed ternary composites.

To prepare a sheet of composite with a thickness of 1mm, compression molding was carried out by hot pressing of 1.08 × 107 Pa at 100 °C for 5 min, and then cold pressing at room temperature for 5 min under the same pressure.

As shown in Table 2, by increasing the amount of chitosan beyond 10 wt%, tensile strength and elongation at break decrease, while the tensile modulus increases, making the composite stiff and rigid. Therefore, PCL/chitosan (90/10 wt%) was chosen as the optimum ratio with the tensile strength, flexibility and elongation at break most in line with the composite’s potential application in packaging.

Table 2.

Tensile properties of PCL/chitosan composite with different proportion.

PCL/Chitosan 100/0 90/10 80/20 70/30 60/40 50/50
Tensile Strength 20.59 15.05 13.23 10.80 8.50 4.89
Elongation at break (%) 1300.00 848.60 505.47 320.10 208.12 87.34
Tensile Modulus 130.26 160.26 168.50 178.32 186.64 195.10

3.3. Characterizations

The infrared spectra of samples were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer FTIR (model spectrum 100 series). FTIR spectra tests were run at ambient temperature using a KBr disk method at wave number range of 400 to 4000 cm−1, resolution of 4 cm−1.

TEM micrographs were obtained by a Hitachi H-7100 at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The nano CaCO3-acetone suspension was prepared and diluted to the correct concentration in an ultrasonic bath for 10 min and then air dried by dropping onto the TEM sample copper grid, and ultrathin sections of nanocomposite sample were prepared at −120 °C using a microtome equipped with a diamond knife, and then placed on a copper grid.

Tensile tests were performed with an Instron Universal Testing Machine (4302 series IX, type V) according to the guidelines of ASTM Standard Method D638-5. The dumbbell-shaped specimens were prepared by a hydraulic cutter. A load cell of 1.0 kN was applied at a constant crosshead speed of 5 mm/min at room temperature. The average of five measurements of tensile determination was calculated.

Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out using a Perkin Elmer Thermal Analyzer model TGA7, on 8–10 mg weight samples in temperature range of 35–800 °C with heating rate of 10 °C/min, under nitrogen atmosphere with a flow rate of 20 mL/min.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was carried out using Leo 1455 VP SEM. The samples were coated with gold by Bal-Tec SDC005 sputter coater.

4. Conclusions

PCL/chitosan nanocomposites with various amounts of CaCO3 nanoparticles were successfully prepared by a melt intercalation method. The tensile modulus increases by adding CaCO3 nanoparticles into the composite. The increase in the modulus must be caused by the rigidity of the filler and strong interactions between the polymer and filler due to the large interfacial area between particles. The tensile strength and elongation at break increase by loading up to 1 wt% of nano-sized CaCO3, and then decrease with the increase of nanoparticle content. This incident occurred due to optimal dispersion of nanoparticles within the matrix and intercalation of nanoparticles by PCL/chitosan at low filler content. However, at high filler loading, due to the agglomeration of nanoparticles into the matrix, the elongation at break decreases.

TGA characterization shows significantly improved thermal stability of PCL/chitosan/nano-CaCO3 compared to that of PCL/chitosan composite. Compared to that of the pristine composite, thermal degradation temperature increases up to 64 °C at 1 wt% of nano-sized CaCO3 content in PCL/chitosan nanocomposite. The nanocomposites possess higher thermal stability compared to the PCL/chitosan composite due to better adhesion between reinforced CaCO3 nanoparticles and matrix and the hindered diffusion of volatile decomposition products resulting from homogeneous dispersion of nanoparticles within the nanocomposites. SEM micrographs show that the nanocomposite becomes more homogeneous than the former composite. However, at higher filler loadings, a higher rate of nanoparticle agglomeration occurs, lowering the tensile strength. Good dispersion of CaCO3 nanoparticles into the matrix results in increased interfacial adhesion and a smoother surface in PCL/chitosan/nano-CaCO3 nanocomposite.

TEM micrographs show good dispersion of nanoparticles within the matrix at 1 wt% nano CaCO3, whereas at higher nanoparticle CaCO3 loading (5 wt%), due to the decrease in distance between nanoparticles, the dispersion of the CaCO3 reduced, hence increasing agglomeration.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to appreciate the Chemistry Department of University Putra Malaysia, especially Mansor Bin Ahmad, and also to extend special thanks to S. Amiri and S. Wood for their great support.

References

  • 1.Fu X., Qutubuddin S. Polymer-clay nanocomposites: Exfoliation of organophilic montmorillonite nanolayers in polystyrene. Polymer. 2001;42:807–813. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang W., Chen D., Zhao Q., Fang Y. Different vinyl acetate content on the morphology and properties of eva/clay nanocomposites. Polymer. 2003;44:7953–7961. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ma C.G., Mai Y.L., Rong M.Z., Ruan W.H., Zhang M.Q. Phase structure and mechanical properties of ternary polypropylene/elastomer/nano-CaCO3 composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007;67:2997–3005. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gorna K., Hund M., Vucak M., Gröhn F., Wegner G. Amorphous calcium carbonate in form of spherical nanosized particles and its application as fillers for polymers. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2008;477:217–225. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liang J.Z. Evaluation of dispersion of nano-CaCO3 particles in polypropylene matrix based on fractal method. Compos. Part A. 2007;38:1502–1506. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xie X.L., Liu Q.X., Li R.K.Y., Zhou X.P., Zhang Q.X., Yu Z.Z., Mai Y.W. Rheological and mechanical properties of PVC/CaCO3 nanocomposites prepared by in situ polymerization. Polymer. 2004;45:6665–6673. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Di Lorenzo M.L., Errico M.E., Avella M. Thermal and morphological characterization of poly (ethylene terephthalate)/calcium carbonate nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2002;37:2351–2358. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gilbert M. Surface Treatments for Particulate Fillers in Plastics. In: Pritchard G., editor. Plastics Additives: An A–Z Reference. Chapman and Hall; London, UK: 1998. pp. 590–603. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bartczak Z., Argon A.S., Cohen R.E., Weinberg M. Toughness mechanism in semicrystalline polymer blends: II. High-density polyethylene toughened with calcium carbonate filler particles. Polymer. 1999;40:2347–2365. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zuiderduin W.C.J., Westzaan C., Huétink J., Gaymans R.J. Toughening of polypropylene with calcium carbonate particles. Polymer. 2003;44:261–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jiang L., Zhang J., Wolcott M.P. Comparison of polylactide/nano-sized calcium carbonateand polylactide/montmorillonite composites: Reinforcing effects and toughening mechanisms. Polymer. 2007;48:7632–7644. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jiang L., Lam Y.C., Tam K.C., Chua T.H., Sim G.W., Ang L.S. Strengthening acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) with nano-sized and micron-sized calcium carbonate. Polymer. 2005;46:243–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Okada M. Chemical syntheses of biodegradable polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2002;27:87–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cao A., Okamura T., Ishiguro C., Nakayama K., Inoue Y., Masuda T. Studies on synthesis and physical characterization of biodegradable aliphatic poly (butylene succinate-co-ɛ-caprolactone)s. Polymer. 2002;43:671–679. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wu C.S. Physical properties and biodegradability of maleated-polycaprolactone/starch composite. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2003;80:127–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu C.S. A comparison of the structure, thermal properties, and biodegradability of polycaprolactone/chitosan and acrylic acid grafted polycaprolactone/chitosan. Polymer. 2005;46:147–155. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Averous L., Moro L., Dole P., Fringant C. Properties of thermoplastic blends: starch-polycaprolactone. Polymer. 2000;41:4157–4167. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ikejima T., Inoue Y. Crystallization behavior and environmental biodegradability of the blend films of poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid) with chitin and chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2000;41:351–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Then Y.Y., Ibrahim N.A., Wan Yunus W.M.Z. Enhancement of tensile strength and flexibility of polycaprolactone/tapioca starch blends by octadecylamine modified clay. J. Polym. Environ. 2011;19:535–539. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wan Y., Lu X., Dalai S., Zhang J. Thermophysical properties of polycaprolactone/chitosan blend membranes. Thermochim. Acta. 2009;487:33–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Calil M.R., Gaboardi F., Guedes C.G.F., Rosa D.S. Comparison of the biodegradation of poly (ɛ-caprolactone), cellulose acetate and their blends by the Sturm test and selected cultured fungi. Polym. Test. 2006;25:597–604. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rao S.B., Sharma C.P. Use of chitosan as a biomaterial: Studies on its safety and hemostatic potential. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1997;34:21–28. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199701)34:1<21::aid-jbm4>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ray S.S., Bousmina M. Biodegradable polymers and their layered silicate nanocomposites: In greening the 21st century materials world. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2005;50:962–1079. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang S.F., Shen L., Tong Y.J., Chen L., Phang I.Y., Lim P.Q., Liu T.X. Biopolymer chitosan/montmorillonite nanocomposites: Preparation and characterization. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005;90:123–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Casariego A., Souza B.W.S., Cerqueira M.A., Teixeira J.A., Cruz L., Díaz R., Vicente A.A. Chitosan/clay films’ properties as affected by biopolymer and clay micro/nanoparticles’ concentrations. Food Hydrocolloids. 2009;23:1895–1902. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sarasam A., Madihally S.V. Characterization of chitosan-polycaprolactone blends for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2005;26:5500–5508. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ahmad M.B., Tay M.Y., Shameli K., Hussein M.Z., Lim J.J. Green synthesis and characterization of silver/chitosan/polyethylene glycol nanocomposites without any reducing agent. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011;12:4872–4884. doi: 10.3390/ijms12084872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abdolmohammadi S., Wan Yunus W.M.Z., Rahman M.Z., Ibrahim N.A. Effect of organoclay on mechanical and thermal properties of polycaprolactone/chitosan/montmorillonite nanocomposites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2011;30:1045–1054. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu L., Li Y., Liu H., Fang Y. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan-graftpolycaprolactone copolymers. Eur. Polym. J. 2004;40:2739–2744. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shan D., Wang S., Xue H., Cosnier S. Direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of hemoglobin entrapped in composite matrix based on chitosan and CaCO3 nanoparticles. Electrochem. Commun. 2007;9:529–534. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gao Y., Liu L., Zhang Z. Mechanical performance of nano-CaCO3 filled polystyrene composites. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 2009;22:555–562. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chan C.M., Wu J., Li J.X., Cheung Y.K. Polypropylene/calcium carbonate nanocomposites. Polymer. 2002;43:2981–2992. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen N., Wan C., Zhang Y., Zhang Y. Effect of nano-CaCO3 on mechanical properties of PVC and PVC Blendex blend. Polym. Test. 2004;23:169–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Reynaud E., Jouen T., Gauthier C., Vigier G., Varlett J. Nanofillers in polymeric matrix: A study on silica reinforced PA. Polymer. 2001;42:8759–8768. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang Q.X., Yu Z.Z., Xie X.L., Mai Y.W. Crystallization and impact energy of polypropylene/CaCO3 nanocomposites with nonionic modifier. Polymer. 2004;45:5985–5994. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Baskaran R., Sarojadevi M., Vijayakumar C.T. Mechanical and thermal properties of unsaturated polyester/calcium carbonate nanocomposites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2011;30:1549–1556. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shimpi N.G., Verma J., Mishra S. Dispersion of nano CaCO3 on PVC and its influence on mechanical and thermal properties. J. Compos. Mater. 2010;44:211–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fuad M.Y.A., Hanim H., Zarina R., Ishak Z.A.M., Hassan A. Polypropylene/calcium carbonate nanocomposites—Effects of processing techniques and maleated polypropylene compatibiliser. eXPRESS Polym. Lett. 2010;4:611–620. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang K., Yang Q., Li G., Sun Y., Feng D. Morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/calcium carbonate nanocomposites. Mater. Lett. 2006;60:805–809. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES