Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Apr 4;68(Pt 5):m536. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812013608

trans-Dichloridobis(quinoline-κN)platinum(II)

Kwang Ha a,*
PMCID: PMC3344296  PMID: 22590062

Abstract

In the title complex, trans-[PtCl2(C9H7N)2], the PtII ion is four-coordinated in an essentially square-planar coordination environment defined by two N atoms from two quinoline (qu) ligands and two Cl anions. The Pt atom is located on an inversion centre and thus the asymmetric unit contains one half of the complex; the PtN2Cl2 unit is exactly planar. The dihedral angle between the PtN2Cl2 unit and the quinoline ligand is 85.1 (1)°. In the crystal, the complex mol­ecules are stacked into columns along the b axis. In the columns, several inter­molecular π–π inter­actions between the six-membered rings are present, the shortest ring centroid–centroid distance being 3.733 (5) Å between pyridine rings.

Related literature  

For the crystal structure of (H-qu)2[PtCl6]·2H2O, see: Ha (2012a ). For the crystal structures of the related PtII complexes cis-[PtCl2(qu)2].0.25DMF (DMF = N,N-dimethyl­formamide) and cis-[PtCl2(qu)2].CH3NO2, see: Davies et al. (2001); Ha (2012b ).graphic file with name e-68-0m536-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • [PtCl2(C9H7N)2]

  • M r = 524.30

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 16.3722 (18) Å

  • b = 6.9543 (7) Å

  • c = 16.0422 (17) Å

  • β = 118.684 (2)°

  • V = 1602.4 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 9.09 mm−1

  • T = 200 K

  • 0.21 × 0.08 × 0.07 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) T min = 0.596, T max = 1.000

  • 4630 measured reflections

  • 1569 independent reflections

  • 1025 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.053

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034

  • wR(F 2) = 0.080

  • S = 0.97

  • 1569 reflections

  • 106 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 1.74 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.97 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812013608/ng5260sup1.cif

e-68-0m536-sup1.cif (18.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812013608/ng5260Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m536-Isup2.hkl (77.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected geometric parameters (Å, °).

Pt1—N1 2.036 (6)
Pt1—Cl1 2.297 (2)
N1—Pt1—Cl1 89.40 (18)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011–0030747).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The title complex, [PtCl2(qu)2] (qu = quinoline), was unexpected obtained as a byproduct from the reaction of K2PtCl6 with qu. The main product of the rection was found as the PtIV complex, (H-qu)2[PtCl6].2H2O, and its crystal structure has been previously reported (Ha, 2012a). It seems that the PtIV ion reduced partially to the PtII ion in the reaction.

In the complex, the PtII ion is four-coordinated in an essentially square-planar coordination environment defined by two N atoms from two qu ligands and two Cl- anions (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The Cl atoms are in trans conformation with respect to each other. By contrast, in the analogous PtII complexes [PtCl2(qu)2].0.25DMF (DMF = N,N-dimethylformamide) (Davies et al., 2001) and [PtCl2(qu)2].CH3NO2 (Ha, 2012b), the Cl atoms are in cis conformation. The cis-PtII complexes were synthesized from the reaction of K2PtCl4 with qu.

The Pt atom is located on an inversion centre, and thus the asymmetric unit contains one half of the complex; the PtN2Cl2 unit is exactly planar. The nearly planar qu ligands, with a maximum deviation of 0.012 (7) Å from the least-squares plane, are parallel. The dihedral angle between the PtN2Cl2 unit and qu ligand is 85.1 (1)°. The Cl atoms are almost perpendicular to the qu planes, with the bond angle of <N1—Pt1—Cl1 = 89.40 (18)°. In the crystal, the complex molecules are arranged in a V-shaped packing pattern and stacked into two distinct columns along the b axis (Fig. 2). In the columns, several intermolecular π-π interactions between the six-membered rings are present, the shortest ring centroid-centroid distance being 3.733 (5) Å between pyridine rings.

Experimental

The single crystals of the title complex were obtained as a byproduct from the reaction of K2PtCl6 (0.2432 g, 0.500 mmol) with quinoline (0.1569 g, 1.215 mmol) in H2O (30 ml). After refluxing of the reaction mixture for 3 h, the formed brown precipitate was removed by filtration, and the solvent of the filtrate was evaporated. The residue was washed with H2O/acetone (1:5) and dried at 50 °C, to give a yellow powder (0.2072 g) (Ha, 2012a). Crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow evaporation at 60 °C from an N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) solution, which was obtained after filtration of the product over the solid-phase extraction column (4 ml) with silica (200 mg).

Refinement

H atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their respective parent atoms: C—H = 0.95 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). The highest peak (1.74 e Å-3) and the deepest hole (-0.97 e Å-3) in the difference Fourier map are located 1.10 Å and 1.51 Å, respectively, from the atoms Pt1 and N1.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A view of the molecular structure of the title complex, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level and the atom numbering. Unlabelled atoms are related to the reference atoms by the (-x, 1 - y, -z) symmetry transformation.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A view of the unit-cell contents of the title complex.

Crystal data

[PtCl2(C9H7N)2] F(000) = 992
Mr = 524.30 Dx = 2.173 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 2043 reflections
a = 16.3722 (18) Å θ = 2.8–25.9°
b = 6.9543 (7) Å µ = 9.09 mm1
c = 16.0422 (17) Å T = 200 K
β = 118.684 (2)° Block, yellow
V = 1602.4 (3) Å3 0.21 × 0.08 × 0.07 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer 1569 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1025 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.053
φ and ω scans θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) h = −20→17
Tmin = 0.596, Tmax = 1.000 k = −8→8
4630 measured reflections l = −19→19

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.080 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.97 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0357P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1569 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
106 parameters Δρmax = 1.74 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.97 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Pt1 0.0000 0.5000 0.0000 0.02655 (16)
Cl1 −0.01185 (14) 0.3931 (3) 0.12923 (14) 0.0373 (5)
N1 0.1091 (4) 0.3178 (9) 0.0354 (4) 0.0270 (15)
C1 0.0927 (5) 0.1473 (11) −0.0038 (5) 0.0297 (19)
H1 0.0304 0.1167 −0.0492 0.036*
C2 0.1608 (6) 0.0079 (12) 0.0170 (6) 0.0353 (18)
H2 0.1455 −0.1133 −0.0141 0.042*
C3 0.2506 (6) 0.0500 (11) 0.0836 (6) 0.036 (2)
H3 0.2986 −0.0426 0.0998 0.043*
C4 0.2710 (5) 0.2304 (11) 0.1273 (5) 0.0247 (17)
C5 0.3626 (5) 0.2867 (13) 0.1961 (5) 0.036 (2)
H5 0.4125 0.1982 0.2142 0.043*
C6 0.3801 (6) 0.4626 (12) 0.2362 (6) 0.036 (2)
H6 0.4416 0.4970 0.2821 0.043*
C7 0.3073 (6) 0.5943 (14) 0.2100 (6) 0.037 (2)
H7 0.3201 0.7184 0.2382 0.044*
C8 0.2177 (6) 0.5482 (11) 0.1443 (6) 0.031 (2)
H8 0.1691 0.6393 0.1275 0.037*
C9 0.1986 (5) 0.3668 (11) 0.1025 (5) 0.0257 (18)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Pt1 0.0162 (2) 0.0315 (2) 0.0279 (2) 0.0031 (3) 0.00741 (16) 0.0021 (3)
Cl1 0.0322 (11) 0.0474 (13) 0.0335 (10) 0.0094 (11) 0.0169 (9) 0.0103 (11)
N1 0.016 (3) 0.031 (4) 0.033 (3) 0.000 (3) 0.011 (3) 0.003 (3)
C1 0.023 (4) 0.027 (5) 0.033 (4) −0.003 (4) 0.009 (4) −0.005 (4)
C2 0.041 (5) 0.025 (4) 0.045 (4) 0.001 (5) 0.025 (4) 0.001 (5)
C3 0.034 (5) 0.037 (6) 0.045 (5) 0.011 (4) 0.025 (4) 0.011 (4)
C4 0.025 (4) 0.023 (4) 0.033 (4) 0.002 (3) 0.018 (4) 0.007 (4)
C5 0.019 (4) 0.050 (6) 0.036 (5) 0.008 (4) 0.011 (4) 0.009 (4)
C6 0.025 (4) 0.054 (7) 0.029 (4) 0.000 (4) 0.013 (4) 0.000 (4)
C7 0.030 (5) 0.042 (5) 0.033 (4) −0.005 (4) 0.011 (4) −0.008 (4)
C8 0.023 (4) 0.036 (6) 0.034 (4) 0.001 (3) 0.014 (4) −0.005 (4)
C9 0.022 (4) 0.030 (5) 0.026 (4) 0.002 (4) 0.013 (4) 0.004 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Pt1—N1i 2.036 (6) C3—H3 0.9500
Pt1—N1 2.036 (6) C4—C9 1.418 (10)
Pt1—Cl1i 2.297 (2) C4—C5 1.425 (10)
Pt1—Cl1 2.297 (2) C5—C6 1.347 (10)
N1—C1 1.308 (9) C5—H5 0.9500
N1—C9 1.382 (9) C6—C7 1.398 (12)
C1—C2 1.392 (10) C6—H6 0.9500
C1—H1 0.9500 C7—C8 1.371 (11)
C2—C3 1.371 (12) C7—H7 0.9500
C2—H2 0.9500 C8—C9 1.392 (11)
C3—C4 1.398 (10) C8—H8 0.9500
N1i—Pt1—N1 180.0 C3—C4—C9 119.6 (7)
N1i—Pt1—Cl1i 89.40 (18) C3—C4—C5 123.0 (8)
N1—Pt1—Cl1i 90.60 (18) C9—C4—C5 117.4 (7)
N1i—Pt1—Cl1 90.60 (18) C6—C5—C4 121.5 (8)
N1—Pt1—Cl1 89.40 (18) C6—C5—H5 119.2
Cl1i—Pt1—Cl1 180.00 (10) C4—C5—H5 119.2
C1—N1—C9 119.7 (7) C5—C6—C7 119.7 (8)
C1—N1—Pt1 118.7 (5) C5—C6—H6 120.1
C9—N1—Pt1 121.6 (5) C7—C6—H6 120.1
N1—C1—C2 124.0 (7) C8—C7—C6 121.4 (8)
N1—C1—H1 118.0 C8—C7—H7 119.3
C2—C1—H1 118.0 C6—C7—H7 119.3
C3—C2—C1 118.3 (8) C7—C8—C9 119.5 (7)
C3—C2—H2 120.8 C7—C8—H8 120.2
C1—C2—H2 120.8 C9—C8—H8 120.2
C2—C3—C4 119.4 (8) N1—C9—C8 120.6 (7)
C2—C3—H3 120.3 N1—C9—C4 119.0 (7)
C4—C3—H3 120.3 C8—C9—C4 120.5 (7)
Cl1i—Pt1—N1—C1 −86.2 (6) C5—C6—C7—C8 0.3 (13)
Cl1—Pt1—N1—C1 93.8 (6) C6—C7—C8—C9 −0.2 (12)
Cl1i—Pt1—N1—C9 96.8 (5) C1—N1—C9—C8 179.3 (7)
Cl1—Pt1—N1—C9 −83.2 (5) Pt1—N1—C9—C8 −3.7 (9)
C9—N1—C1—C2 −0.6 (12) C1—N1—C9—C4 0.1 (10)
Pt1—N1—C1—C2 −177.7 (6) Pt1—N1—C9—C4 177.1 (5)
N1—C1—C2—C3 0.9 (13) C7—C8—C9—N1 −179.3 (7)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −0.6 (12) C7—C8—C9—C4 −0.1 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C9 0.2 (12) C3—C4—C9—N1 0.1 (11)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −179.1 (7) C5—C4—C9—N1 179.4 (7)
C3—C4—C5—C6 179.2 (8) C3—C4—C9—C8 −179.1 (7)
C9—C4—C5—C6 −0.1 (11) C5—C4—C9—C8 0.2 (11)
C4—C5—C6—C7 −0.2 (12)

Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y+1, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: NG5260).

References

  1. Bruker (2000). SADABS, SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Davies, M. S., Diakos, C. I., Messerle, B. A. & Hambley, T. W. (2001). Inorg. Chem. 40, 3048–3054. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  4. Ha, K. (2012a). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 227, 31–32.
  5. Ha, K. (2012b). Acta Cryst. E68, m491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812013608/ng5260sup1.cif

e-68-0m536-sup1.cif (18.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812013608/ng5260Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m536-Isup2.hkl (77.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES